i
i
Digitized by
the Internet Archive
in 2015
https://archive.org/details/messagesaddresseOOsanf
,1
MESSAGES, ADDRESSES, AND
PUBLIC PAPERS
OF
TERRY SANFORD
Governor Terry Sanford
North Carolina Sf at* Library
Raieigh
MESSAGES, ADDRESSES, AND
PUBLIC PAPERS
OF
TERRY SANFORD
GOVERNOR OF NORTH CAROLINA
1961-1965
Edited by
Memory F. Mitchell
Editor, Division of Publications
State Department of Archives and History
Raleigh
Council of State
State of North Carolina
1966
PREFACE
Before he left office, Governor Terry Sanford expressed the
opinion that the public addresses and papers of his administra-
tion should be held to one volume. The overwhelming number
of addresses, dedication ceremonies, informal talks, statements
for the press, news conferences, articles, and reports made the job
of elimination of material the most difficult phase of preparing
this volume for the press. Even a hasty review of the complete
file of material would impress anyone with the tremendous ener-
gy of, work done by, and contributions made by Governor San-
ford.
Several criteria were used in determining which addresses to
include in full, which to summarize, and which only to list. Ap-
pearances at significant meetings and events, speeches in which
new policies or ideas were brought to light, and typical addresses
on various subjects were considered; an effort was made to pub-
lish in full meaningful materials fitting one or more of these
standards. Where summaries in a page or less were substituted
for full addresses, the central theme and main points were given
without the inclusion of much detail.
Relatively few of the many proclamations, executive orders,
and statements could be used; here again, an effort was made to
select those of particular significance and those which were
illustrative of the activities and programs of the Governor and
of his administration.
Funds for this volume were provided by the Council of State,
as has been the custom for volumes of papers of other governors.
The editor wishes to thank Governor Sanford himself for his
suggestions and advice; his press secretary, Mr. Graham Jones,
for checking many points, answering innumerable questions,
helping with the selection of illustrations, and giving valuable
advice throughout the months the volume was in preparation;
and Dr. Christopher Crittenden, director of the North Carolina
State Department of Archives and History, for his encourage-
ment, support, and guidance. Mrs. Nancy S. Bartlett and Miss
Marie D. Moore, editorial assistants with the State Department
of Archives and History, deserve and are hereby given recognition
and thanks for their many hours of tedious and painstaking work.
Mrs. Bartlett prepared the list of appointments, and she and
Miss Moore did research for headnotes and footnotes, helped
prepare copy for the printer, and rendered assistance in ways far
too numerous to mention. Appreciation is also expressed to Miss
Brenda M. Smith, Mrs. Elizabeth C. Swindell, and Mrs. Ann W.
Little, who assisted with the proofreading and the indexing.
All illustrations used in the book were furnished by Mr. Graham
Jones.
Memory F. Mitchell
November 1, 1966
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Preface v
Biographical Sketch, January 5, 1961 xxi
Inaugural AddresS;, January 5, 1961 3
Messages to Joint Sessions of the General Assembly:
Budget Message, February 9, 1961 11
Special Message on Education, March 6, 1961 26
Biennial Message, February 7, 1963 34
Budget Message, February 8, 1963 67
Special Message on Traffic Safety, April 2, 1963 75
Message to the General Assembly at Cullowhee, May 14, 1963 81
Address to the Special Session of the General Assembly,
October 14, 1963 86
Public Addresses and Summaries of Public Addresses:
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, November 21, 1960 91
Association of the U. S. Army, Braxton Bragg Chapter, Fort
Bragg, January 24, 1961 102
North Carolina Press Association, Chapel Hill, February 2, 1961* 106
Wilson Industrial Council Industry and Education Dinner,
Wilson, February 6, 1961* 107
Grifton Junior Chamber of Commerce, Grifton, February 10, 1961* 107
Farmers Cooperative Council of North Carolina, Raleigh,
February 21, 1961 108
North Carolina Prison Department Personnel, Raleigh,
February 22, 1961* 113
City-wide PTA Rally, Fayetteville, February 28, 1961* 113
Education Rally, Smithfield, March 9, 1961 114
Confederate Centennial Day, Louisburg, March 18, 1961* 119
Education Rally, Goldsboro, March 20, 1961* 119
Future Farmers of America, Coats, March 23, 1961* 120
Report to the People over State-wide Television Network, Raleigh,
March 23, 1961* ' 121
Northeastern North Carolina Industrial Development Conference,
Tarboro, April 5, 1961 122
North Carolina Mother's Day Program, Raleigh, April 10, 1961* 126
Fourth Annual Authors Luncheon, Goldsboro, April 18, 1961* 126
1961 Convention of North Carolina Congress of Parents and Teachers,
Winston-Salem, April 19, 1961* 127
Salute to East Carolina College, Greenville, April 26, 1961* 128
Bath High School Chapter of Future Farmers of America, Bath, April
28, 1961* 128
Southeastern North Carolina Industrial Development Conference,
Clinton, May 3, 1961* 129
Dedication Address at Washington County Union School, Roper,
May 4, 1961* 129
Sixty-fifth Annual Convention, North Carolina Bankers Association,
Pinehurst, May 9, 1961* 130
* Summarized
viii
Table of Contents
Ohio Valley Industrialists and Businessmen, Ohio Valley Tour, May
22-26, 1961 130
High Point College Graduation Exercises, High Point, May 28, 1961*.— 135
Woman's College Alumnae of Wake County, Raleigh, May 29, 1961* .135
Presbyterian Junior College Commencement, Maxton, June 5, 1961* ..-136
Western North Carolina Industrial Development Conference
(delivered by Hargrove Bowles, Jr.), Waynesville, June 6, 1961* 136
North Carolina Association of Broadcasters, Durham, June 8, 1961 137
Youth Fitness Commission, Raleigh, June 10, 1961 143
Annual Conference, Teachers of Vocational Agriculture, Greensboro,
July 13, 1961* 146
Dedication of Federal Housing Administration Office, Greensboro,
July 13, 1961* 146
Dedication of Benson National Guard Armory, Benson, July 16,
1961 147
South Carolina Education Week Conference, Columbia, South
Carolina, July 18, 1961 150
State 4-H Club Week Meeting, Raleigh, July 26, 1961 159
Presentation of Freedom Association World Peace Award to Dr. Frank
Porter Graham, Eighth Annual Southeastern World Affairs Institute,
Blue Ridge, July 29, 1961* 165
Summer Leadership Conference, North Carolina Classroom Teachers
Association, Mars Hill, August 2, 1961* 166
Annual Superintendents Conference, Mars Hill, August 9, 1961* 166
Agribusiness Caravan Luncheon, Raleigh, August 10, 1961* 167
Daniels Family Reunion, Wanchese, August 19, 1961 168
National Security Seminar, Fort Bragg, August 25, 1961 169
Charlotte-Mecklenburg School Convocation, Charlotte, August 30,
1961* 172
Ceremony of Transfer of U.S.S. "North Carolina" from United States
Navy to State of North Carolina, Bayonne, New Jersey, September
6, 1961* 173
Semiannual Meeting, Tidewater Alumni Chapter, University of North
Carolina, Norfolk, Virginia, September 6, 1961* 173
Northwestern North Carolina Industrial Conference, Wilkes-
boro, September 7, 1961* 174
Weeks Law Golden Anniversary Celebration, Biltmore Forest, Ashe-
ville, September 26, 1961* 175
Dedication of Business and Professional Women's Club Headquarters,
Chapel Hill, October 1, 1961* 175
South Piedmont District NCEA, Kannapolis, October 3, 1961 176
State Convention of Democratic Women of North Carolina, Winston-
Salem, October 5, 1961 184
Fifty-fifth Annual Meeting, North Carolina Textile Manufacturers
Association, Pinehurst, October 6, 1961* 187
Annual Meeting, Fifth District Medical Society, Pinehurst, October
11, 1961* 187
Dedication Ceremonies, Juvenile Evaluation Center, Swannanoa,
October 14, 1961* 188
Kentucky Democratic Dinner, Lexington, Kentucky, October 14,
1961* 188
* Summarized
Table of Contents
ix
Opening Ceremonies of the Ninety-fourth North Carolina State Fair,
Raleigh, October 16, 1961* 189
Governor's Conference on Economic Development, Chapel Hill,
November 1, 1961* 190
South Central Piedmont North Carolina Industrial Development
Conference, Concord, November 2, 1961* 190
Luncheon Meeting of New York City Bankers, New York City, Novem-
ber 6, 1961* .- _-..191
College of the Albemarle Dedication and Inauguration Ceremonies,
Elizabeth City, November 7, 1961* 192
North Carolina State School Boards Delegate Assembly, Chapel Hill,
November 8, 1961* 192
Tenth Anniversary Ceremonies, University of North Carolina School
of Nursing, Chapel Hill, November 8, 1961* 193
North Carolina Resource-Use Education Conference, Durham, Novem-
ber 16, 1961* 193
Northeastern Soil and Water Conservation Districts, Edenton, Novem-
ber 16, 1961* 194
Twenty-sixth Annual Meeting of the North Carolina Farm Bureau
Federation, Raleigh, November 21, 1961 194 -
Report to the People Over State-wide Television and Radio Network,
Raleigh, November 27, 1961 202
North Central North Carolina Industrial Development Conference,
Elon College, November 29, 1961* 211
First Congressional District Young Democratic Clubs Rally, Nags
Head, December 8, 1961* 212
North Carolina Annual Meeting of Traffic Safety Council, Raleigh,
December 18, 1961* 213
North Carolina Young Democratic Clubs Meeting, Statesville, January
6, 1962* 213
North Carolina Industrial Development Foundation, Greensboro,
January 11, 1962* 214
Mid-Year Conference, Marathon Chapter Number Two, Order of
Ahepa, Charlotte, January 14, 1962* 215
Mooresville Chamber of Commerce, Mooresville, January 16, 1962* 215
North Carolina Press Association, Chapel Hill, January 18, 1962* 216
Fourth Annual Highway Conference, Raleigh, January 30, 1962 216
Salem Chamber of Commerce Annual Dinner, Salem, Virginia,
February 1, 1962* 220
Temple Emanuel Brotherhood Meeting, Greensboro, February 2,
1962* 221
Granville Industrial Dedication Day, Oxford, February 6, 1962* 221
North Carolina Citizens Committee for Better Schools, Raleigh,
February 22, 1962* 222
To Students of North Carolina Over State-wide Television, Raleigh,
March 1, 1962 222
Board of Directors Meeting of the North Carolina Traffic Safety
Council, Inc., Greensboro, March 15, 1962* 231
Eighty-first Annual Meeting of the North Carolina Teachers Associ-
ation, Raleigh, April 12, 1962* 231
Annual Meeting, North Carolina Credit Union League, Raleigh, April
14, 1962* 232
* Summarized
X
Table of Contents
Inauguration Exercises Luncheon, Gardner-Webb Junior College,
Boiling Springs, April 16, 1962* 232
Conference on Food Processing and Marketing, Raleigh, April 17,
1962* 233
Dinner Honoring John W. Umstead, Jr., Chapel Hill, April 18,
1962* 233
Savings Bond Meeting, Raleigh, April 19, 1962* 234
Dedication of U.S.S. "North Carolina" Memorial, Wilmington, April
29, 1962* 234
North Carolina Conference for Social Service, Raleigh, April 30,
1962 235
Atlanta Alumni Chapter of the University of North Carolina, Atlanta,
Georgia, May 2, 1962* 239
Medical Society of North Carohna, Raleigh, May 8, 1962* 239
North Carolina State Democratic Convention, Raleigh, May 17,
1962* 240
Graduation Exercises, Appalachian State Teachers College, Boone,
May 26, 1962* 241
June Dairy Month "Kick-Off" Breakfast, Raleigh, June 1, 1962* 241
Commencement Exercises, North Carolina School for the Deaf, Mor-
ganton, June 6, 1962* 242
Report to the People Over State-wide Television and Radio Network,
Raleigh, June 6, 1962 242
Opening Session of Summer Workshop at Southern Regional Edu-
cation Board Meeting, Williamsburg, Virginia, June 15, 1962* 250
Annual Luncheon, North Carolina Association of County Commis-
sioners, Morehead City, June 18, 1962* 251
North Carolina Methodist Conference, Kinston, June 19, 1962* 251
Southern Association of Baptist Colleges and Schools and Education
Committee of the Southern Baptist Convention, Winston-Salem,
June 27, 1962* 252
National Governors Conference, Hershey, Pennsylvania, July
2, 1962* 253
National Association of County Officials, New York City, July 11,
1962 254
Dedication of the Charlotte Industrial Education Center, Charlotte,
July 18, 1962 260
Avery County Chamber of Commerce, Crossnore, August 1, 1962* . 265
Annual Meeting, North Carolina Police Executives Association,
Raleigh, August 3, 1962* 265
Ceremonies Commemorating the Establishment of the First Soil Con-
servation District in America, Wadesboro, August 7, 1962* 266
Special Address on the Food Processing Industry Over State-wide
Television Network, Durham, August 7, 1962 266
Eleventh Annual Legislative Work Conference, Southern Regional
Education Board, Biloxi, Mississippi, August 16, 1962* 274
Introduction of Sir Edward Boyle at the Three Hundred and Seventy-
fifth Anniversary Celebration of the Birth of Virginia Dare, Manteo,
August 18, 1962* 274
Dedication of Interstate 85 Link in Gaston County, McAdenville,
August 25, 1962* 275
* Summarized
Table of Contents xi
Dedication of Royster Building at Cherry Hospital, Goldsboro, Septem-
ber 12, 1962* 276
Annual Reunion of Airborne Association, Washington, D. C, Septem-
ber 13. 1962* 276
Methodist Men of Gastonia District, Polkville, September 13, 1962 277
Court Improvements Amendment, WTVD, Durham, September 28,
1962* 278
Southern Regional Education Board, Hollywood, Florida, October
1, 1962* - 278
"Problems of a Governor" Panel, Southern Governors Conference,
Hollywood, Florida, October 4, 1962* 279
First Congressional District Democratic Rally, Edenton, October 9,
1962* 280
State-wide School Dropout Meeting, Raleigh, October 11, 1962* 280
Haywood County Democratic Rally, Waynesville, October 22, 1962 -—281
North Carolina State Grange Convention, Kinston, October 26,
1962* 285
Report to the People Over State-wide Television and Radio Network,
Raleigh, October 31, 1962 285
Veterans Day Ceremony on Battleship U.S.S. "North Carolina," Wil-
mington, November 11, 1962* 291
Founders Day Celebration at Methodist College, Fayetteville, Novem-
ber 15, 1962 292
Dedication of North Carolina National Bank Building, Charlotte,
November 26, 1962* 301
Commission on Secondary Schools of Southern Association of Colleges
and Schools, Dallas, Texas, November 28, 1962 301
Shaw University, Raleigh, December 3, 1962* 307
Southern Albemarle Convention, Plymouth, December 8, 1962* ^307
Faculty Club of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,
January 8, 1963* 308
Bright Leaf Tobacco States Conference, Raleigh, January 28, 1963—- 309
First Institute for Parole Board Members, Chapel Hill, February 11,
1963 311
American Association of School Administrators, Atlantic City, New
Jersey, February 19, 1963* 319
"North Carolina Day" at Sales Executives Club of New
York, New York City, February 26, 1963 320
Introduction of Vice-President Lyndon B. Johnson, Raleigh, March 30,
1963* 327
Dedication, School of Public Health Building, University of North
Carolina at Chapel Hill, April 7, 1963* 327
First National Conference, National Committee for Support of the
Public Schools, Washington, D. C, April 8, 1963* 328
Chicago Appreciation Luncheon for Charlotte Chamber of Commerce,
Chicago, Illinois, April 17, 1963* 329
Annual Sixth District Meeting, Omega Psi Phi Fraternity, A & T
College, Greensboro, April 27, 1963 329
National Association of Hosiery Manufacturers, Atlantic City, New
Jersey, April 29, 1963* 333
Capitol Press Club Dinner Honoring Vice-President Lyndon B. John-
son, Washington, D.C., May 18, 1963 334
* Summarized
xii Table of Contents
1963 Commencement Exercises, University of North Carolina at
Chapel Hill, June 3, 1963* 338
The Governor's School of North Carolina, Winston-Salem, June 10,
1963 339
Summer Workshop, Southern Regional Education Board, Chapel Hill,
June 12, 1963* 343
North Carolina Association of Broadcasters, Durham, June 17, 1963 344
State Future Farmers of America Convention, Raleigh, June 27,
1963* 351
Legislative Work Conference, Southern Regional Education Board,
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, August 8, 1963* 352
Convention of Associated Master Barbers of North Carolina, Durham,
September 2, 1963 - 353
North Carolina State Employees Association, Durham, September 7,
1963* 356
State-Federal Conference on Mental Retardation, Warrenton, Virginia,
September 19, 1963 356
Southeastern Regional Conference of the American Public Welfare
Association, Asheville, September 25, 1963* 365
Society of American Archivists and American Association for State and
Local History, Raleigh, October 3, 1963* 365
Legislative Work Conference of New England Board of Higher Edu-
cation, Portsmouth, New Hampshire, October 8, 1963* 366
Raleigh Home Builders Association, Raleigh, October 9, 1963* 367
Twentieth Annual Teachers Institute, Raleigh, October 10, 1963* 367
Maryland State Teachers Association, Baltimore, Maryland, October
17, 1963 368
Quarterly Conference of the Board of Conservation and Development,
Asheville, October 22, 1963 373
North Carolina Association of Realtors, Asheville, October 24, 1963 —.373
Dedication of Satellite Tracking and Data Acquisition Facility, Ros-
man, October 26, 1963* 377
Dedication of Kerr Scott Dormitory, East Carolina College, Greenville,
November 3, 1963* 378
State Principals Conference, Greensboro, November 7, 1963* 378
Ohio Association of School Administrators, Ohio School Business
Officials, and the Ohio School Boards Association, Columbus, Ohio,
November 12, 1963* 379
North Carolina Association for Retarded Children, Raleigh, November
13, 1963* 380
Harvard University: The Alfred D. Simpson Lecture of 1963, Cam-
bridge, Massachusetts, November 15, 1963 380
Kentucky Association for Mental Health, Louisville, Kentucky,
November 19, 1963* 396
National Conference on Government of the National Municipal
League, Detroit, Michigan, November 19, 1963* 397
Albemarle Area Development Association, Edenton, December 13,
1963* 398
Dedication of First Flight Airport, Kill Devil Hills, December 17,
1963 398
Dedication of W. W. Holding Industrial Education Center, Raleigh,
January 8, 1964* 400
* Summarized
Table of Contents
xiii
^ North Carolina Press Association, Chapel Hill, January 16, 1964* 401
Distinguished Service Award and Bosses' Night Banquet, Hickory,
January 30, 1964* 402
Annual Workshop for Cottage Counselors, Eagle Springs, February 4,
1964* 402
Industrial Development Conference, Raleigh, February 6, 1964* 403
Tarheel Electric Membership Association, Raleigh, February 11,
1964* 403
Rotary District 769, Southern Pines, March 7, 1964* 404
Travel Council of North Carolina, Raleigh, March 16, 1964* 404
Testimony Before the Federal Trade Commission, Washington, D.C.,
March 18, 1964* .-____-405
Forty-fourth Annual Convention of American Association of Junior
Colleges, Bal Harbour, Florida, April 1, 1964* 406
National Association of Tobacco Distributors, Miami Beach, Florida,
April 6, 1964 406
Davidson County NCEA Banquet, Lexington, April 8, 1964* 417
Educare, Los Angeles, California, April 10, 1964* 418
Western Carolina College Assembly, Cullowhee, April 14, 1964* 419
Meeting of County Chairman of John Fitzgerald Kennedy Library
Drive, Chapel Hill, April 16, 1964* 419
Statement Before the United States House of Representatives, Ad Hoc
Subcommittee on the War on Poverty Program of the Committee on
Education and Labor, Washington, D.C., April 17, 1964* 420
Foundations Group, New York City, April 21, 1964* 421
Governor's Conference on Occupational Health, Greensboro, April
23, 1964* 422
North Carolina Products Week Luncheon, Raleigh, April 24, 1964* -422
Dedication of Herbert C. Bonner Bridge, Oregon Inlet, May 2, 1964* ____423
Ground-breaking Ceremonies, North Carolina Jewish Home for the
Aged, Clemmons, May 3, 1964* 423
Institute of Religion, Raleigh, May 5, 1964* 424
Welcome to President Lyndon B. Johnson, Rocky Mount, May 7,
1964 425
Student Activities Banquet, Raleigh, May 12, 1964* 428
John F. Kennedy Memorial Tribute, Chapel Hill, May 17, 1964 429
Farm-Industry Day, Woodleaf, May 19, 1964* 430
State Democratic Convention of 1964, Raleigh, May 20, 1964 431
Testimony, Special Appalachian Committee of the House Public
Works Committee, Washington, D.C., May 22, 1964* 433
Commencement Exercises of 1964, University of North Carolina,
Chapel Hill, June 1, 1964* 434
Report to the Governors Conference, Cleveland, Ohio, June 8, 1964 ..434
North Carolina Association of County Commissioners, Morehead City,
June 15, 1964* 439
American Symphony Orchestra League and Community Arts Councils,
Detroit, Michigan, June 20, 1964 440
Dedication of Wayne County Technical Institute, Goldsboro, June
24, 1964* 449
Dedication of Stanley Power Tools Plant, New Bern, June 25, 1964* ____449
State-wide Television Address on Political Campaign, Charlotte, June
26, 1964 450
Summarized
xiv Table of Contents
Student NEA Notables Dinner, Seattle, Washington, July 2, 1964* 454
Democratic Unity Dinner, Charlotte, July 31, 1964 455
Raleigh Food Brokers Dinner, Raleigh, August 12, 1964* 456
Pioneer Corn Company Open House, Laurinburg, August 29, 1964* — 457
Carnegie Awards Banquet of Winston-Salem Optimist Club, Winston-
Salem, September 5, 1964* 458
Dinner Honoring the Duke Endowment, Charlotte, September 24,
1964* 458
Carolina Textiles, Inc., Plant Dedication, Monroe, September 24,
1964* 459
Forty-second Annual Western District NCEA Meeting, Asheville,
September 29, 1964* 460
State-wide Planning Meeting on School Construction, Raleigh, October
I, 1964 460
Southern Association of State Planning and Development Agencies,
Raleigh, October 5, 1964* 463
Dedication Ceremonies for New Dormitories at Chowan College, Mur-
freesboro, October 17, 1964* 463
Piedmont Crescent Tour Banquet, Charlotte, October 20, 1964 464
Governor's Travel Information Conferences, Greenville, Winston-
Salem, Asheville, October 28, 29, 30, 1964* 466
Opening of the Advancement School, Winston-Salem, November 8,
1964 ' 467
Governors Conference on Education, Atlanta, Georgia, November
II, 1964* 468
New Jersey Education Association, Atlantic City, New Jersey, Novem-
ber 13, 1964* 469
Dedication of State Legislative Building (delivered by Hugh Cannon) ,
November 20, 1964 470
Dedication of Sandhills Community College, Southern Pines, Novem-
ber 25, 1964* 471
Convention of the National Council of Teachers of English, Cleve-
land, Ohio, November 26, 1964* 472
Dedication of Gaston College, Dallas, December 6, 1964* 472
Dedication of Site for Food Science Building, North Carolina State of
the University of North Carolina at Raleigh, December 11, 1964* 473
Prodigal Sons and Daughters of North Carolina Luncheon, Washing-
ton, D.C., December 21, 1964 474
Report to the People over State-wide Television and Radio Network,
Raleigh, January 4, 1965 479
List of Other Speeches and Addresses 491
Proclamations:
Proclaiming a State of Emergency as a Result of Damage from Devas-
tating Storm, March 8, 1962 525
Proclaiming Thanksgiving Day, November 22, 1962 526
Proclaiming an Extraordinary Session of the General Assembly, Octo-
ber 10, 1963 527
Proclaiming Electors for President and Vice-President, December 9,
1964 528
Proclaiming January 7 and 8, 1965, for the Festivities and Ceremonies
for the Inauguration of Dan K. Moore, January 7, 1965 529
* Summarized
Table of Contents
XV
Executive Orders:
Establishing the Governor's Commission on Educational Television,
May 15, 1962 533
Establishing the North Carolina Outer Banks Seashore Park Com-
mission, August 3, 1962 534
Establishing the Governor's Commission on the Status of Women,
October 11, 1963 - 536
Establishing the North Carolina Arts Council, December 3, 1964 538
statements:
Designating North Carolina's Opening of the Civil War Commemo-
ration, January 6, 1961 — 543
Designating "Brotherhood Week," February 6, 1961 544
Regarding State Personnel, April 12, 1961 544
Concerning Economic Legislation, April 24, 1961 545
Announcing the North Carolina International Trade Fair, April 27,
1961 546
Commending the North Carolina Senate on Passage of the Revenue
Act, June 8, 1961 - 547
Applauding the Passage of the Appropriations Act by the State House
of Representatives, June 8, 1961 548
On the Settlement of the Mars Hill School Controversy, June 13,
1961 548
On Executive Clemency, July 4, 1961 552
On Employment of Ex-Prisoners, July 27, 1961 553
On the Death of Lieutenant Governor H. Cloyd Philpott, August 19,
1961 555
Statement of Friendship with Mexico, September 10, 1961 555
On the Governor's Commission on Education Beyond the High
School, September 15, 1961 556
Urging Economy in Government, November 25, 1961 559
Christmas Statement, December 20, 1961 560
On the Burch-Brewer Case, January 7, 1962 560
On Pride in North Carolina's Progress, January 11, 1962 563
On the Ports Authority Bonds Matter, March 2, 1962 564
Designating "Peace Corps Day," March 12, 1962 565
On Per Capita Income, May 1, 1962 565
On the Death of Charlie Gold, June 28, 1962 566
On the Deaths of North Carolina Officers in Viet Nam, July 19,
1962 566
On the Saving of Tax Funds, August 4, 1962 567
On the Proposed Environmental Health Center, September 5, 1962 567
Designating "Youth Appreciation Week," November 9, 1962 570
On Medical Care for Indigents, December 26, 1962 571
Designating "Carl Sandburg Day," December 27, 1962 572
Designating "Job Corps Week," January 2, 1963 572
Proclaiming the Tercentenary of the Carolina Charter of 1663, Janu-
ary 4, 1963 574
On Industrial Progress, January 10, 1963 574
Reporting School Improvements, January 17, 1963 576
Observation for a Second Century, January 18, 1963 578
On Establishing the Good Neighbor Council, January 18, 1963 579
On the Development of the Cape Fear River Basin, March 14, 1963 --580
On the Future of Recreation in North Carolina, March 15, 1963 582
XVI
Table of Contents
On Highway Construction and Maintenance, March 29, 1963 584
On the Proposed Breatholizer Bill, April 26, 1963 585
Designating "Law Day," April 30, 1963 586
Proposal on Behalf of the Forgotten Children, May 5, 1963 587
On North Carolina's Part in the Space Age, May 5, 1963 591
Favoring a Fair Minimum Wage, June 2, 1963 594
On the Death of Pope John XXIII, June 3, 1963 595
On the Progress and Potentials of North Carolina, June 5, 1963 595
On Bible Readings and Prayers in the Public Schools, June 18, 1963— -596
Statement to Negro Leaders Meeting at the Capitol, June 25, 1963 597
On the Need for a Special Session of the General Assembly, June 26,
1963 599
Statement at Meeting of the North Carolina Good Neighbor Council,
July 3, 1963 600
On the Founding of the North Carolina Fund, July 18, 1963 601
Urging Students Back to School, August 15, 1963 602
On Fund Approved for Advance Purchase of Right-of-Way, October
3, 1963 603
On the Elsie Webb Controversy, October 12, 1963 603
On the Redistricting of the State Senate, October 23, 1963 606
On Driver Training Requirement for Youth, November 4, 1963 607
Reaction to the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy, Novem-
ber 22, 1963 607
On the Death of President John Fitzgerald Kennedy, November 23,
1963 607
Impressions Received During First Conference with President Johnson,
November 26, 1963 608
On Natural Resources of the State, December 13, 1963 609
On His Role in the Primary Campaign, January 26, 1964 610
On Establishing the Learning Institute of North Carolina, February
2, 1964 611
On the Vocational Education Program, February 12, 1964 613
On the Research Triangle, February 12, 1964 613
On the New Western Residence for the Governor, March 9, 1964 614
On the President's Anti-poverty Program, March 18, 1964 614
Designating Special Time for the Aging in North Carolina, April 17,
1964 616
On Community Projects to be Supported by Federal Grant, April 20,
1964 617
Announcing the Location of the State School of the Performing Arts,
April 30, 1964 618
Concerning Highway Patrol Matters, May 9, 1964 619
On the Success of the Kennedy Memorial Drive, May 17, 1964 621
Appeal for Responsible Campaign Behavior and Attitudes, May 24,
1964 621
Urging Citizens to Vote, May 29, 1964 622
Denouncing Actions of the Ku Klux Klan as Illegal, June 22, 1964 .—623
On the Civil Rights Act, July 7, 1964 624
On the Death of L. Y. Ballentine, July 19, 1964 626
Urging Support of the Democratic Candidate for President, July
23, 1964 626
Reply to Friends Desiring to Promote His Candidacy for Vice-Presi-
dent, August 18, 1964 628
Comment on the Democratic Ticket, August 26, 1964 629
XVll
Table of Contents
Articles on Subject of "Strategy for State Development" 629
Announcing the "Whistle Stop Tour" of Mrs. Lyndon B. Johnson,
September 27, 1964 634
Statement Made on Election Evening, November 3, 1964 635
Appeal for Support of the Tobacco Quota Referendum, December 3,
1964 636
Warning to the Ku Klux Klan, December 7, 1964 637
On the Decision to Pardon Boyd Pay ton, December 31, 1964 638
News Conferences:
August 10, 1961 638
Appointments 649
Index 751
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
Facing Page
Inauguration day, January 5, 1961 6
The Sanford family in 1961 7
The Governor addressing the General Assembly 64
The Governor and the Council of State, 1964 65
"Pie in the Sky" 118
The Governor and Mrs. Sanford participating in Civil War Centennial
observance 119
Mr. and Mrs. Cecil Sanford 126
Governor Sanford with Judy Pleasant and her letter 127
President Kennedy's visit to the University of North Carolina, 1961 172
U.S.S. "North Carolina" 173
Miss America of 1962 with Governor Sanford 324
The Governor at new industrial plant 325
Dedication of Kerr Scott Dormitory at East Carolina College 378
Governor Sanford with portrait of Governor Charles B. Aycock 379
The Governor and his son water-skiing 404
Concern with tobacco problems 405
Visit of President Johnson to Rocky Mount farm 428
Tribute to President John F. Kennedy, May 17, 1964 429
The Governor at Transylvania Music Camp in Brevard 448
Group leaving for New York, to participate in North Carolina Day
at the World's Fair 449
Award to the Governor by the National Education Association 486
"Stones for the House that Terry Built" 487
Birthday party to celebrate North Carolina's tercentenary 574
Participation of the Governor at trade fair 575
Good Neighbor Council 600
The Governor with projects submitted to the North Carolina Fund 601
The Governor with blind children examining Faith 7 capsule 610
Learning Institute of North Carolina meeting 611
Campaign visit of President Johnson in fall of 1964 626
Governor Sanford jumping from training tower at Fort Bragg 627
TERRY SAN FORD
By
Graham Jones
"The hopes of North Carolina, the hopes of America and the
hopes of our world will rise higher from the desks of the class-
rooms than from the launching pads at Cape Canaveral."
Thus did Terry Sanford evaluate education in the early 1960's
during the race for space.
Terry Sanford made quality education the overriding issue
of three arduous campaigns for office in 1960 and he made quality
education the number-one goal of his four years as Governor.
Two weeks after his election, Sanford addressed an audience of
educators from across North Carolina at Memorial Auditorium
on the campus of the University of North Carolina at Chapel
Hill.
During the preceding year, he had outlined the broad general
framework of the Quality Education Program. On the campus
of the oldest state university in the nation, that November night,
he delivered one of the longest addresses of his career. In that
address, he spelled out the specifics of the Quality Education
Program.
Dr. James Bryant Conant, President Emeritus of Harvard
University called the program "a landmark in American edu-
cation."
An elderly professor, sitting on a back row of the large audi-
torium, said: "Good Lord! He meant what he said during the
campaign."
It was perfectly natural that the young Governor-elect of
North Carolina should have chosen Chapel Hill for his "State-
ment of Faith and Purpose in Education."
For it was at the University of North Carolina that he had
worked his way through to an undergraduate degree. It was at
Chapel Hill where he had met, courted, and won for his wife a
vivacious and charming young coed from Hopkinsville, Ken-
tucky, Margaret Rose Knight.
It was at Chapel Hill that he and Margaret Rose had set
up housekeeping following his years of service in Europe during
World War II. And it was at Chapel Hill where, following
World War II, he earned his law degree and served as Assistant
Director of the Institute of Government.
But more important than his many personal attachments to
Chapel Hill, was the influence of the university on the state of
North Carolina for more than a century and a half.
XXll
Terry Sanford
Often when newsmen from other states interviewed the Gover-
nor, they would raise the question: "What makes North Carolina
different?" Invariably, Governor Sanford ranked the University
of North Carolina as one of the major reasons.
Terry Sanford came to the university from the farm trading
town of Laurinburg where he was born August 20, 1917. His
father was the soft-spoken Cecil L. Sanford, an independent
merchant and realtor. His mother, Elizabeth Martin Sanford,
a native of Salem, \'irginia, taught in the public schools for forty
years.
When, in 1966, Sanford published his first book But What
About the People? he dedicated it to his mother "who heightened
my interest in education" and to his father "who heightened my
interest in politics."
Terry Sanford's entry into politics came in 1928, when, as an
eleven-year-old, he marched in a torchlight parade in Laurinburg
for Al Smith. He carried a sign proclaiming, "Me and Ma Is For
Al."
After graduating from Laurinburg High School, Sanford stud-
ied for a semester at Presbyterian Junior College at Maxton
before transferring to the university at Chapel Hill. Like many
of his classmates during the depression of the 1930's, Sanford
worked. He delivered newspapers. He washed dishes in a cafe.
He was a bus boy at Swain Hall. He was an assistant manager of
a dormitory and he was a laundry agent.
During his student days, Sanford found time to win the
presidency of his dormitory and a seat in the Student Legislature.
In student politics, he met many of the men who twenty years
later would help elect him Governor.
As for his courtship with the coed majoring in English, he
says with a grin that he knew Margaret Rose Knight a year
before he got up nerve enough to ask her for a date.
However the shyness did not stop him from marrying Margaret
Rose on July 4, 1942, while Sanford was serving as a special agent
for the Federal Bureau of Investis^ation.
Shortly after their marriage, Sanford left his draft-exempt post
with the FBI to enlist in the paratroops. He won his jump boots
and the bars of a second lieutenant before being shipped to
Europe.
During the war, he fought in five campaigns in Italy, France,
Belgium, and Germany. Included in those campaigns was a
jump with the 517th Parachute Combat Team into the invasion
of Southern France and action in the Battle of the Bulge, the
last German attack of the war.
After returning to the States, Sanford returned to Chapel Hill
Terry Sanford
xxiii
to complete work on his law degree which he earned in 1946.
For the next two years, he served as an assistant director of the
Institute of Government.
In 1948 he moved to Fayetteville where he set up his law prac-
tice. In Fayetteville, he was active in church, veterans, and civic
affairs.
In the Methodist church, he was a district lay leader and
chairman of the Board of Trustees of Methodist College.
He served as a charter member of the Fayetteville Area In-
dustrial Development Commission, as president of the Fayetteville
Junior Chamber of Commerce, as director of the Chamber oi
Commerce, as chairman of the Fayetteville Red Cross, as presi-
dent of the United Services Fund, and as a director of the Chil-
dren's Home Society of North Carolina. He was active in the
Masons, the Shrine, and the Rotary Club.
Fellow veterans elected him Judge Advocate of the North
Carolina Department of the American Legion.
It was from Fayetteville that he launched his first state-wide
campaign for political office. In 1949 Sanford successfully sought
the presidency of the Young Democratic Clubs of North Caro-
lina. In a vigorously contested race at New Bern, Sanford won
over two opponents.
In that YDC campaign, Sanford had the strong support of O.
Max Gardner, Jr., of Shelby. In 1960, from the bed that multiple
sclerosis confined him to, Gardner wrote the check for Sanford's
filing fee for Governor.
In 1950 North Carolina's "Go Forward " Governor W. Kerr
Scott appointed Sanford as a member of the State Ports Authority
which he served during a period of major expansion of North
Carolina's deep-water ports at Morehead City and Wilmington.
By 1952 Sanford was running for and winning the State
Senate seat from Cumberland County.
When Scott began to get ready to run for the United States
Senate in 1954, he chose Terry Sanford as his state campaign
manager. The Scott family and the "Branchhead" leadership
rallied behind Sanford's campaign of 1960.
So did Charles M. Johnson, the man Kerr Scott had defeated
for Governor in 1948.
Sanford's campaign organization was diverse and so was his
support across the state. That support included men of as widely
varying views as Charles A. Cannon, head of the historically
nonunion Cannon Mills, and W. Millard Barbee, president ol
the State AFL-CIO. It included strong advocates of civil rights
and strong advocates of state rights. It included distinguished
professors on college campuses and men and women who could
xxiv
Terry Sanford
barely write enough to vote.
In short, the Sanford team included the kind of coalition that
elected Franklin Roosevelt, and it was a fair composite of the
populace of North Carolina.
Sanford left no doubt as to where he stood on the major issues
of the day.
He detailed those positions in an address to the Young Demo-
cratic Club at Chapel Hill early in 1960 in a 32-point "Positive
Program for Progress." And he spelled them out as he traveled
into every one of the state's 100 counties.
Running against Sanford in the campaign were three strong
candidates: Malcolm E. Seawell, Attorney General of North Caro-
lina under Governor Hodges; John D. Larkins, Democratic
National Committeeman and former Chairman of the State
Democratic Executive Committee; and Dr. I. Beverly Lake,
former Assistant Attorney General and former Professor of Law
at Wake Forest College.
During the first primary, the attacks centered on Sanford, who
was generally acknowledged as the front-runner.
Because of his strong support for the Quality Education Pro-
gram and his frank pledge to raise new taxes if necessary to pay
the cost, Sanford was labeled "High Tax Terry" and accused
of playing Santa Glaus.
One opponent charged that Sanford was promising "pie in the
sky."
To that charge, Sanford answered with a quick grin: "If it's
pie in the sky, let's put it in the oven and start cooking."
Seawell and Larkins were eliminated in the first primary and
Sanford led Dr. Lake by an 88,000-vote plurality.
In the runoff, the race issue was a major question.
Sanford's position was short and clear: "What we need," he
said, "is massive intelligence, not massive resistence."
Sanford and his supporters took a lesson from the 1950 Demo-
cratic primary runoff for the United States Senate when the race
question became the decisive factor.
Rather than lose the initiative, they took the offensive. Sanford
workers, who had been up until dawn counting votes of the first
primary, were back at work in Room 4-B of Raleigh's Carolina
Hotel by noon of Sunday, May 29, 1960. At 8 a.m. on Monday,
Sanford was holding his customary Monday morning press con-
ference at the Carolina.
There followed four weeks of campaigning from the Atlantic
to the Appalachians and from the dawn shifts at mill gates to
midnight handshaking at factory doors.
Sanford's theme during the second primary was: "Let's not
Terry Sanford
XXV
close our schools, let's improve them."
For a week or two of those hot June days, the electorate of
North Carolina seemed precariously balanced between moder-
ation and massive resistance, between a New Day and a return
to Rip Van Winkle, between moving out into the mainstream
of American life and a trip up a dead-end tributary.
But when North Carolinians voted on Saturday, June 25, they
cast a 76,000-vote majority for Sanford and for his New Day
programs.
Within a couple of weeks of his nomination, Sanford was in
Los Angeles for the National Democratic Convention. The morn-
ing after arriving, he held a press conference and strongly en-
dorsed Senator John F. Kennedy.
Some of Sanford's strongest supporters had warned him before
he left North Carolina for the convention that if he backed
Kennedy, he would never be Governor. Sanford not only en-
dorsed the Massachusetts Catholic, he made one of the seconding
addresses.
Sanford and eleven other Tar Heel delegates voted for Ken-
nedy and promptly were dubbed "the Dirty Dozen."
A deluge of angry telegrams and irate letters descended on
Sanford headquarters at the Carolina Hotel and the Sanford
quarters in Los Angeles.
Anti-Catholic newspaper ads and literature began to pop out
across North Carolina. The man who had just won a tremendous
victory over racial prejudices, with the passions still running hot,
returned to North Carolina to face a fight against religious
prejudices.
Sanford did not hesitate for a moment. He told the voters in
town after town that he believed Jack Kennedy would make
North Carolina and America a great President, "another young
Roosevelt." And, he said in effect, if you don't want to vote for
Kennedy, don't vote for me!
Historical precedent seemed against Kennedy and Sanford.
The only time that North Carolinians had voted for a Republi-
can for President since the Civil War was in 1928 when Catholic
Al Smith headed the Democratic ticket. Moreover, North Caro-
lina's Democratic majorities for President had been dwindling
ever since 1936— to the point that Adlai Stevenson squeaked out
a majority of only 15,000 in 1956.
When the votes were counted on November 8, North Caro-
lina was still Democratic, with a 57,000-vote majority for Ken-
nedy and a 122,000-vote majority for Sanford.
In his inaugural address, Sanford repeated his campaign
promises for the Quality Education Program, for an accelerating
XX\'l
Terry Sanford
drive for new industry, for a reinvigorated farm economy, and
for new roads.
In general, he pledged his administration to a New Day in the
Old North State.
"I call," he said, "on all citizens to join with me in the au-
dacious adventure of making North Carolina all it can and ought
to be."
The youngest Governor of North Carolina since Charles
Aycock was not long is displaying his own audacity.
Sanford had been in the Capitol but sixty days when he went
upstairs on Monday night, March 6, 1961, to deliver his Special
Budget Message on Education before a joint session of the Gen-
eral Assembly.
It is a story as old as parliamentary government that legis-
lators and constituents like to vote for appropriations but dislike
the taxes that make the appropriations possible.
In his address that winter night, Cfovemor Sanford asked
for both: a Quality Education Program that would add $100
million of enrichment funds to North Carolina's public schools,
and removal of hundreds of exemptions in North Carolina's
sales tax and called for additional levies on alcoholic beverages to
pay the cost.
One of the sales tax exemptions that was to be removed was
that on food.
In concluding his address. Governor Sanford told the legislators
in whose hands the Quality Education Program rested:
The hour is at hand when North Carolina can begin its bold march
forward. We begin this march in these halls by reaching out and grasping
the hands of our greatest possession, our children and our grandchildren.
The hand we grasp today is the strong handclasp to the future, the hand
of a leader in the world's struggles.
I thank you for your attention to the future of North Carolina.
As he had anticipated, the tax was unpopular.
Why, shouted critics, didn't he recommend a tax on luxuries?
Wasn't he taking bread out of the mouths of children with the
food tax?
He answered promptly, on March 9 in an address at Smithfield:
If we tax bread, we also will be taxing cake. If we tax fatback, we also
will tax caviar. If we tax corn meal, we also will tax filet mignon.
No one is going to go hungry because of this tax. But the children of
North Carolina will go thirsty for quality education if we do not enact this
program for better schools.
The Governor took the same kind of message across the state
during the following ninety days. It made no difference whether
Terry Sanford
xxvii
he was speaking to bankers or barbers, businessmen or farmers, at
country clubs or county fairs. His speeches invariably turned out
to be pleas for the Quality Education Program and the tax to
support it.
The Governor also passed along the message to members of
the General Assembly morning after morning over red-eye gravy
at the Mansion, day after day over coffee at the Capitol, and
night after night over cigars back at the Mansion.
On the key votes. Governor Sanford and the Quality Edu-
cation Program won by a three-to-one majority in the House and
a four-to-one majority in the Senate.
The North Carolina Education Association, whose members
had been among Governor Sanford's strongest supporters, pro-
vided this checklist of what the Quality Education Program
entailed:
1. Pay increases for teachers and all other school personnel.
(The pay raises for the teachers averaged 22 per cent.)
2. Addition of 2,826 teachers for North Carolina's rapidly
multiplying student enrollment, and the addition of 44 assistant
superintendents, 25 supervisors and more home economics and
vocational teachers.
3. Clerical assistants for schools with $1.50 per pupil allocated
to provide the clerks.
4. Library allotment doubled— from 50 cents per pupil to
1 1.00, and instructional supplies raised from $1.12 to $1.50 per
pupil.
5. In-service courses for professional improvement of teachers
provided at a cost of $300,000, and 300 additional teacher-train-
ing scholarships offered.
6. Increased salaries for college personnel and an additional
$70,100 for expansion of television teaching.
7. Increased funds for industrial education centers and a
strengthened Department of Public Instruction.
8. Establishment of the Department of Curriculum and Re-
search to keep curriculums of the public schools abreast of the
latest developments and techniques.
The National Education Association ranked North Carolina as
the pace setter in the nation in the advancement of education.
Sanford went on the stump again. This time he told superin-
tendents, principals, and teachers that the burden now rested
upon their shoulders.
He carried his quality education message directly to school
children across the state. He told the students— whites, Negroes,
and Indians, first graders through seniors: "You can't get quality
education out of a 'Ready Mix Box.' You have to work for it."
XXVlll
Terry Sanford
He warned them that "brainpower has replaced backpower."
Altogether, Sanford spoke to an estimated 279,000 students in
their schools.
The influence of the Quality Education Program extended far
beyond the borders of North Carolina. When the Governor and
a team of other North Carolinians visited Cincinnati on a travel
mission in May, 1961, they were shown an Ohio education
journal urging action in the Buckeye state comparable to that
which Sanford had begun in North CaroUna.
Several successful candidates for high public office in other
states asked for, and received, copies of Governor Sanford's
Quality Education Program.
During his four years as Governor, Sanford was invited to
speak on quality education from Columbia, South Carolina, to
Los Angeles and Seattle; and from Biloxi, Mississippi, and Dallas,
Texas, to Harvard and Yale universities.
In all, he spoke in thirty other states during his administration,
almost always on quality education.
When he attended his first Southern Governors Conference at
Nashville, Tennessee, in the summer of 1961, Sanford was elected
chairman of the Southern Regional Education Board and was
re-elected the following year.
Throughout his campaigns for Governor and throughout his
administration, Sanford spoke for education as a whole, "from
the first grade through the graduate school."
After the 1961 legislative victory for public education, the
Governor appointed a blue-ribbon Commission on Education
Beyond the High School. Headed by noted Winston-Salem at-
torney Irving E. Carlyle and including strong educational and
lay leaders from across North Carolina, the commission sub-
mitted to the Governor a thorough study of the state's needs for
education beyond the high school and recommendations on how
to meet those needs.
Governor Sanford strongly endorsed the program and threw
the weight of his administration behind its adoption by the
1963 General Assembly.
The highlights of the Governor's Higher Education Act were:
1. Establishment of a network of comprehensive community
colleges across the state so that higher education would be within
the geographic and economic reach of tens of thousands of North
Carolina boys and girls who could not afford to go away to school.
The comprehensive community colleges were to be financed
jointly by state and local governments. They were to provide
courses ranging from teaching illiterate adults how to read and
write to vocational training and college parallel work.
Terry Sanford
XXIX
2. Establishment of three new senior colleges— one in the East
at Wilmington, one in the Piedmont at Charlotte, and one in
the West at Asheville.
3. Stipulation that North Carolina should have one university
with its campuses at Chapel Hill, Raleigh, and Greensboro, and
such other campuses in the future as the trustees and the General
Assembly should deem advisable.
The section on the Consolidated University paved the way for
full university status at Raleigh and Greensboro and made possi-
ble the subsequent addition of Charlotte College as the Uni-
versity of North Carolina at Charlotte.
The consensus of educators was that Governor Sanford's Higher
Education Act of 1963 ranked in importance with the Revolution-
ary Constitutional provision for a university and with the con-
solidation of the university in 1931.
In education, as in other fields, Governor Sanford constantly
searched for new ideas on how to do the job better.
Among the new ideas in education that he translated into
being were the following:
The Governor's School at Winston-Salem where gifted chil-
dren could study each summer in an eight-week course of instruc-
tion from talented teachers.
The North Carolina School of the Arts, a resident school pro-
viding training in the arts by outstanding instructors.
The Advancement School to afford under-achieving students
the chance to catch up and to provide the state a laboratory for
teaching teachers how to reach students who were not performing
up to their abilities.
The Learning Institute of North Carolina at Durham to pro-
vide research programs for the improvement of education.
Operation Second Chance, a retraining program for dropouts
in three sections of the state.
A privately financed loan program to help high school gradu-
ates get the money to go on to college. "If you have the will and
the skill," Sanford told high school seniors, "we will help you
find the way." He did so with the aid of the North Carolina
Bankers Association.
One group that weighed heavily on the Sanford conscience was
the mentally retarded, whom he called "the forgotten children."
The first trip he made after returning to North Carolina fol-
lowing the Los Angeles convention in 1960 was to the mental
hospitals of the state. Escorting Sanford from hospitals at Morgan-
ton to Goldsboro was John W. Umstead, Jr., Chairman of the
State Hospitals Board of Control and a champion of the mentally
retarded and the mentally ill.
XXX
Terry Sanford
The young gubernatorial nominee and the veteran legislator
spent a week visiting with boys and girls who, at the time, seemed
to have no chance in life other than to be treated as well as
some pet animal.
Later, Governor Sanford was to remember the wards he saw
on that trip. He summed up his feelings this way:
Of all the inventions down through the centuries, of all the discoveries
since the time of Eden, of all the miracles of nature, there is none that
approaches the magnificence, the intricacies or the potentials of the human
mind.
It is an indictment of our society and the society of other nations that
while learning to open canned foods electrically, to broadcast voices and
pictures electronically; to manufacture cars with automatic gears and power
steering and power brakes and without cranks, to dam the greatest of our
rivers; to irrigate the most arid of our lands; to travel safely under the
polar cap; to fire missiles across oceans and continents; and to reach toward
the stars themselves— that while doing all of these things, we have failed to
find the solution to the problems of mental retardation.
To speed the search toward the solution, Governor Sanford
asked the 1963 General Assembly for funds to establish a Center
for Mental Retardation at Chapel Hill for the training of special
teachers, for expansion of vocational training, and for an allot-
ment to the State Board of Health for the identification and
evaluation of retarded children.
The members of the 1963 General Assembly strongly approved
the program.
Although education was the overriding issue of his campaigns
for office and the overriding goal of his administration, Sanford
was keenly aware of the need for new industry with new and
better-paying jobs in North Carolina.
The children who were studying under the Quality Education
Program would need good jobs when they finished their edu-
cation.
The rural people coming off the farms because of mechani-
zation needed jobs.
Industrial employees being automated out of work needed jobs.
Governor Sanford sought to secure those jobs in a number of
ways. He took a tour of industrial centers in the Ohio Valley
(Pittsburgh, Columbus, Dayton, Indianapolis, and Cincinnati)
in May, 1961, with leaders from across the state. He provided
strong leadership for two International Trade Fairs at Charlotte
to bring buyers from other states and foreign countries to North
Carolina to see Tar Heel products. He invited industrialists with
prospective new plants to the Mansion on Blount Street. And he
told the North Carolina story to audiences of businessmen in
New York, Chicago, and other major cities.
Terry Sanford
xxxi
At the end of his administration, the State Department of
Conservation and Development reported the score for new in-
dustry during the Sanford years:
The greatest investment in new and expanded plants in any
four-year period in North Carolina's history was made from 1961
to 1965, more than $1.2 billion worth. This investment created
120,489 new jobs and increased annual payrolls in the state by
more than |400 million.
The United States Department of Labor later reported that
during the period in which Terry Sanford was Governor, North
Carolina outstripped all other states in the rate of increase for
nonfarm jobs.
In agriculture, Governor Sanford placed his greatest emphasis
on food processing.
Symbolic of that emphasis were scores of new food plants and
a new Food Science Building at North Carolina State University.
Speaking on the Raleigh campus, Sanford summarized his
thoughts on food processing: "Today, the most important thing
is not how many pecks of pickled peppers Peter Piper picks.
What's important is how many pecks of pickled peppers Peter
Piper processes, packages and make profits on."
Despite advances on education, industrial, and agricultural
fronts. Governor Sanford worried about the low living standards
of many North Carolinians.
Among the things that ^vorried him ^vas the fact that North
Carolina suffered from one of the highest rates of illiteracy, one
of the lowest rates of per capita income and some of the poorest
housing in the nation.
As a strong advocate of the free enterprise system, he believed
the economy was only so strong as its weakest links.
As a devout church member, he felt he was his brother's
keeper. He was concerned for the underfed and underclothed
child, for the physically and fiscally disabled and for the indigent
old.
The Governor moved in several ways to lift the hopes and
the lives of the underprivileged. Included in those moves was
action to improve the lot of migrant farm workers and support
for extending and increasing the state's minimum wage act.
Governor Sanford expressed his concern for the underprivi-
leged in a letter to state agency heads after Christmas of 1962.
He wrote: "I saw a raggedly-clothed boy who had worn his
shoes through to the cold December ground. I wondered whose
job it is to help him. ... I talked with a little girl who had not
had a decent meal since school was out."
The Governor concluded his letter this way: "Those in need
XXXll
Terry Saxford
of help are not just 'cases.' These are people. Our people. They
need our help. We cannot do our job by sitting down and wait-
ing for them to come to us. Reach out. Find them. Seek them out.
Don't miss one."
In 1963 Governor Sanford led in the establishment of the
North Carolina Fund which was designed to seek out the poor
and to help them become self-respecting and self-supporting.
The fund "ivas incorporated after months of preliminary work
with the Ford Foundation and the Z. Smith Reynolds and the
Mary Reynolds Babcock foundations. The Ford Foundation
contributed 87 million to the fund, the Z. Smith Reynolds Foun-
dation gave 81,625,000, and the Mary Reynolds Babcock Foun-
dation allocated 5875,000.
Sanford summarized the need and the goal of the North Caro-
lina Fund:
In North Carolina there remain tens of thousands whose family income is
so low that daily subsistence is always in doubt. There are tens of thousands
who go to bed hun,grv, get up hungry and go to school hungry. There are
tens of thousands of voung people who have no skills and no present likeli-
hood to get a skill. There are tens of thousands who live in houses that are
a blight on the landscape.
There are tens of thousands whose dreams will die. Some of this poverty
is self-imposed and some is undeserved. All of it withers the spirit of children
who neither imposed it nor deserve it. These are the children of poverty who
tomorrow will become the parents of poverty.
^Ve hope to break this cycle of poverty. That is what the North Carolina
Fund is all about.
Governor Sanford and the North Carolina Fund invited Tar
Heel communities to submit proposals for comprehensive attacks
on po\erty that Avould serve as pilot projects. The Community
Action Programs ^\"ere designed to tie together the efforts of edu-
cational, ^velfare, health, employment, and other public and
private agencies.
The call brought in 51 proposals covering 66 counties.
Another major effort of the fund ^vas designed especially for
the children of poverty. Under the Comprehensive School Im-
provement Program, often called the "3-R's Project," the fund
allocated 82 million to the State Board of Education ^vith match-
ing funds from the state. Under that project, hundreds of schools
throughout the state worked to improve the foundation courses
for children in the first three grades.
^Vhen the United States Congress ^vas holding hearings on
the federal anti-povertv program, Governor Sanford ^vas invited
to IVashington to testifv' on the progress of North Carolina's
program ^^vhich already ^vas underway. After adoption of the fed-
eral legislation. President Lyndon B. Johnson invited the Cover-
Terry Sanford
XXXlll
nor to Washington to witness the signing of the act.
During the four years of the Sanford administration a constant
question was a problem that is as old as pigmentation— the prob-
lem of people of different races living together peacefully.
After the Revolutionary War, North Carolinians had refused
to ratify the constitution until the first American civil rights act
had been approved— the Bill of Rights.
North Carolinians took pride in that heritage. They also took
pride in the fact that during the Civil War Tar Heels were "first
at Bethel, farthest at Gettysburg . . . and last at Appomattox."
To this old state the young Governor brought a new message
for a New Day. In his inaugural address, he said: "As we move
into the challenging and demanding years ahead, no group of
our citizens can be denied the right to participate in the oppor-
tunities of first-class citizenship."
In an address to a convocation of South Carolina educators in
Columbia, on July 18, 1961, the Governor declared: "The South
is rising again! It is not rising through secession from the Union,
nor through insurrection, nor through nullification. It is rising
through education, through commerce and through agriculture."
He concluded that address by noting that "the South can rise
and march again. We will make this march not with bayonets
but with textbooks. We will not be firing on Fort Sumter. We will
be firing on the dungeons of ignorance."
Throughout his administration, Terry Sanford worked to
translate his words of good will into concrete action.
When Freedom Riders traveled through North Carolina there
was precious little news filed. The rides didn't make news be-
cause there were no incidents.
Sanford recalled afterward with a happy chuckle that the
closest thing to a riot during the travels occurred at the bus
station in Raleigh. A mob of people— whites and Negroes— con-
verged there one night. The soft drink machine had stripped a
gear and was dispensing free drinks. Everyone wanted a free drink.
Another incident that permitted a bit of laughter in the
usually grim and potentially explosive confrontation occurred
when the American Nazi Party sent self-styled "Hate Riders"
through the state. As he did so often to prevent racial conflict
and possible bloodshed, Governor Sanford called quietly on the
State Highway Patrol for assistance. A patrol car was assigned
to follow the car from the time it entered North Carolina from
Virginia until the time it made its exit. As he was nearing the
South Carolina border, the driver of the "hate" car took a wrong
turn and got lost. The patrolman, following the best tradition
of courtesy and helpfulness of the Highway Patrol, gave the
XXXIV
Terry Sanford
driver directions to the road out of North Carolina and bade
him goodbye.
There were militants in both races who seemed determined to
break North Carolina's record of moderation and restraint.
One was Robert Williams of Monroe, whom the National As-
sociation for the Advancement of Colored People had expelled.
Williams collected a small arsenal of weapons and grew a Fidel
Castro beard. Williams' activities in North Carolina came to an
end when he and several others were charged with kidnapping
a white couple. Williams fled the state and made his way to Cuba
where for several years he made propaganda broadcasts for the
Cuban Communists. From Cuba, he reportedly went on to Com-
munist China.
In an address to the Southern Association of Colleges and
Secondary Schools in Dallas, Texas, on November 28, 1962,
Governor Sanford again tied his belief in the human dignity of
all men to education:
"We need our own and a new kind of Emancipation Procla-
mation which will set us free to grow and build, set us free from
the drag of poor people, poor schools, from hate, from dema-
goguery. . . . This kind of proclamation can be written in one
word: Education."
Early in his term, Governor Sanford began laying the ground-
work for major and positive action on the race question.
He led up that action deliberately. Key steps along the way
were a statement on North Carolina's economy and an address
to fellow Methodists at Polkville.
In the statement. Governor Sanford noted that North Caro-
lina's per capita income would jump ten places on the national
scale of states if Negro income were as high as the income of
white citizens.
In the address at Polkville, he argued that the religious beliefs
of North Carolina could not be reconciled with second-class
citizenship.
Then, on January 18, 1963, Governor Sanford went again to
Chapel Hill to address the North Carolina Press Association. In
less than five minutes Sanford delivered probably the shortest
address a Governor had ever made to the newsmen. And, most
of the editors agreed, the most important.
Noting that 1963 was the one-hundredth anniversary of the
emancipation of Negroes from slavery in America, Governor
Sanford said:
"Now is a time not merely to look back to freedom but forward to the
fulfillment of its meaning. Despite great progress, the Negro's opportunity
to obtain a good job has not been achieved in most places across the country.
Terry Sanford
XXXV
Reluctance to accept the Negro in employment is the greatest single block
to his continued progress and the full use of the human potential of the
nation and its states.
"The time has come for American citizens to give up this reluctance, to
quit unfair discriminations, and to give the Negro a full chance to earn
a decent living for his family and to contribute to higher standards for him-
self and all men. . . ."
The Governor then announced establishment of the Good
Neighbor Council whose duties would be to encourage employ-
ment across North Carolina without regard to race and to urge
all young people to become better educated and, thereby, quali-
fied for employment opportunities as they opened.
To head the Good Neighbor Council, Sanford appointed
veteran state official David S. Coltrane. Dr. James T. Taylor of
North Carolina was named vice-chairman and the places on the
council were filled by leaders of both races, including repre-
sentatives of some of the most important companies in the state.
The editors and reporters who heard the Good Neighbor ad-
dress gave the Governor a standing ovation. More important, the
news media of the state carried support of the council across the
state.
That pleased the Governor, but it did not surprise him. He
knew as personal friends the editors and reporters of Tar
Heel newspapers, radio and television stations from Manteo to
Murphy. During his four years in office, a large majority of
North Carolina's 'Tourth Estate" supported the Governor on
his major programs, while never abdicating the right to take
shots at him whenever the mood arose.
Newsmen were frequent visitors at the Governor's Mansion
during the Sanford years. They came for breakfasts and for
briefings. Included were editors of the smallest weeklies in North
Carolina and such nationally syndicated columnists as Scotty
Reston of the New York Times, Drew Pearson, and author
Theodore White.
Under the guidance of the Governor and Margaret Rose San-
ford, an open door policy was maintained at the old Victorian
house on Blount Street. Tens of thousands of Tar Heels and
visitors from other states and other nations were welcomed there.
During the Sanford tenancy, the Mansion was the site for
such white tie occasions as the symphony balls, initiated by the
Governor to raise funds for the North Carolina Symphony, and
such blue jean parties as an old-fashioned peach ice cream churn-
ing the Governor arranged for several hundred orphans.
Adding enthusiasm and laughter to the stately rooms of the
Mansion were the Sanford children, Betsy and Terry, Jr. From
XXXV 1
Terry Sanford
time to time, Governor Sanford would momentarilv suspend
conferences with top state officials to listen to a report on young
Terrv''s football game and to hear about a new dress Betsv
wanted.
Toward the end of his administration, Governor Sanford sat
down in the Mansion Librarv with one of his long legal pads
and began to jot do^vn a list of programs he had underwav.
He compiled a list of 88 projects, a number that members of
his staff thought was conservative. ""He has more irons in the fire
than a blacksmith," noted one friend.
Among the highlights of the achievements made bv North
Carolina under the Sanford administration were:
The Qualitv Education Program, which Dr. Frank Porter
Graham called the greatest advance in education throughout
North Carolina's historv.
The accelerating drive for ne^\' industrv, which produced
120,000 new jobs and which, according to United States govern-
ment figures, made North Carolina the pace setter in the nation.
A reinvigoration of the agricultural economv ^vith a new em-
phasis on food processing.
The establishment of an anti-poverty program that sen^ed as a
model for states across the nation.
The encouragement of peaceful and progressive race relations
based on decency and democracy during a time of upheaval in
America,
The first court reform in North Carolina in the twentieth
centurv.
The establishment of the State Board of Science and Tech-
nology' to assure that North Carolina, ^vhich ^vas a century- late
in the Industrial Revolution, ^vould be at the launching of the
Space Age.
The first reapportionment of the State House of Represen-
tatives and the State Senate in twenty years.
Prison policies that led to a decreasing prison population in
North Carolina while most states ^vere suffering increases.
The construction of thousands of miles of new secondary, pri-
marv. and interstate roads.
A budget policv that "^vas "fiscallv sound and forward bound"
and under which some of the largest surpluses in Tar Heel
history were compiled.
During Terrv Sanford's administration, a lot of roads were
built. A lot of buildings ivere raised. And a lot of crops ^vere
planted.
But the roads ^\"ill wear out and the buildings someday will
be razed and the crops will be rotated.
Terry Sanford
xxxvii
The lasting monument to Terry Sanford will rise in the minds
of the boys and girls who went to school during the Sanford years
and in the minds of their children and their grandchildren.
He said that education was the rock on which he would build
the house of his administration.
Education also was the rock on which his stature rose.
INAUGURAL ADDRESS
INAUGURAL ADDRESS
Memorial Auditorium, Raleigh
January 5, 1961
[As one newspaperman described the inauguration ceremonies of Gov-
ernor Terry Sanford, "Pomp and politics dominated the day." The formali-
ties marking the beginning of a new administration were brought to a
colorful climax at noon on Thursday, January 5, 1961, when, in Raleigh's
Memorial Auditorium, official acceptance of the office of chief executive oc-
curred. In ceremonies lasting less than an hour. Governor Sanford, Lieutenant
Governor Cloyd Philpott, and numerous other state officials took their
respective oaths of office administered by members of the North Carolina
Supreme Court. Immediately after the ceremonies, an inaugural parade was
staged on Fayetteville Street, witnessed by Governor Sanford and other
dignitaries.]
There is a new day in North Carolina!
I am here not to proclaim it, but rather to acknowledge its
arrival.
It is here because our people are seeing, with new vision, the
richness and vastness of the resources of North Carolina. It is
here because they have seized upon the ideas which will turn
these resources into limitless achievement.
There is an eagerness, an alertness, a confidence, a will to move
ahead, that has now caught up our people and fired them with
the reality of a new day.
It is here because of the past achievements of the people who
have dreamed and worked and sacrificed for North Carolina
throughout this century.
It is here because Charles Brantley Aycock^ had a great heart
and dauntless vision, and because he made North Carolina believe
in universal education in an uncertain, uneasy and difficult day.
The new day is at hand because Glenn,^ Kitchin,^ Craig,^ and
^Charles Brantley Aycock (1859-1912), lawyer, Governor of North Carolina,
1901-1905. During his administration improvements in state educational standards
were realized, including the establishment of three colleges, expansion of public
schools, and increase of teachers' salaries. Beth G. Crabtree, North Carolina Gov-
ernors, 1585-1958: Brief Sketches (Raleigh: State Department of Archives and
History, 1958), 113-114, hereinafter cited as Crabtree, North Carolina Governors.
'Robert Broadnax Glenn (1854-1920), lawyer, state legislator, state solicitor,
United States district attorney, and Governor, 1905-1909. Crabtree, North Carolina
Governors, 114-115.
^William Walter Kitchin (1866-1924). editor, lawyer. Governor, 1909-1913. Crab-
tree, North Carolina Governors, 116-117.
* Locke Craig (1860-1925) , farmer, lawyer from Asheville, Governor, 1913-1917.
Crabtree, North Carolina Governors, 117-118.
4
Papers of Terry Sanford
Bickett ^ were willing to step out in bold leadership when the day
was still dark.
The arrival of the new day acknowledges the imagination of
Morrison^ in anticipating the transportation requirement of a
growing state in a growing region.
It acknowledges the fiscal soundness and responsibility con-
tributed by McLean''^ and Gardner,^ and the advance of higher
education under Morrison, McLean, and Gardner, culminating
in the consolidation of the Greater University.
It acknowledges the courage of Ehringhaus,^ who led the way
to unpopular decisions in order that our public schools could be
financed during the depression.
It acknowledges the stability and public conscience of the
Hoey^^ and Broughton^^ administrations, the medical care and
the human concern of a great and good state.
It acknowledges the sturdy courage of Cherry^^ ^nd Umstead/^
the still-broadening public conscience in the goal of total care for
the mentally ill and retarded.
It acknowledges the tough-minded, warm-hearted, unbeatable
^ Thomas Walter Bickett (1869-1921) , teacher, lawyer from Franklin County,
legislator in 1907, Governor, 1917-1921. Crabtree, North Carolina Governors, 119-120.
® Cameron Morrison (1869-1953), lawyer and political leader widely credited with
the final overthrow of Republicanism in North Carolina. While Governor, 1921-
1925, he helped unify the state through the expansion of the primary road system,
and he championed improvement in educational facilities. Crabtree, North Carolina
Governors, 120-121.
^ Angus Wilton McLean (1870-1935), Democratic party leader. Governor, 1925-
1929. He re-established the sound credit rating of the state, expanded executive
power, and consolidated state departments. Crabtree, North Carolina Governors,
122-123.
« Oliver Max Gardner (1882-1947), Governor, 1929-1933, state legislator, Lieu-
tenant Governor, delegate to Democratic conventions. Among his accomplishments
as chief executive was the consolidation of the University at Chapel Hill, State
College in Raleigh, and Woman's College in Greensboro. Crabtree, North Carolina
Governors, 123-124.
«John Christoph Blucher Ehringhaus (1882-1949), lawyer. Governor, 1933-1937.
Advances made under his leadership in social welfare included the rural electrifica-
tion program, workmen's compensation legislation, and crop control. Crabtree,
North Carolina Governors, 125-126.
^° Clyde Roark Hoey (1877-1954), printer and newspaper publisher, lawyer, legis-
lator. Governor, 1937-1941. He advocated progressive educational ideas and the
modern parole system. Crabtree, North Carolina Governors, 126-127.
"Joseph Melville Broughton (1888-1949), lawyer, principal, community leader,
state legislator, Governor, 1941-1945. He supported teacher pay increase, a retire-
ment plan for all state employees, and an improved health program. Crabtree,
North Carolina Governors, 125-126.
^2 Robert Gregg Cherry (1891-1957), lawyer, World War I veteran, state legisla-
tor. Governor, 1945-1949. He championed expansion of the state's health program.
Crabtree, North Carolina Governors, 129-130.
" William Bradley Umstead (1895-1954) , teacher, civic and religious leader from
Durham, Governor, 1953 until his death in November, 1954. Crabtree, North
Carolina Governors, 132-133.
Inaugural Address
5
drive of the "Great Agrarian," Kerr Scott/"^ bodily lifting up the
rural segment of our economy, putting a new pulse-beat into the
progressive heart of North Carolina.
It acknowledges the life of Luther Hodges, whose energy
paved the road of industrial development, and whose calm skill
steered us through the threatened storms of racial strife to the
shores of wisdom.
It acknowledges these and many other things, and it acknow-
ledges in the names of these governors the tens of thousands of
loyal and selfless members of the General Assembly, the teachers,
the state employees, the institutions, the agencies, and the count-
less citizens who have shared each other's love of North Carolina.
It acknowledges the spirit of North Carolina— that we are doing
well but we must do better— that we can do whatever we set out
to do.
For many years our progress was impeded by the shackles of
inadequate capital, the limitations of an economy in which agri-
culture was not sufficiently matched with high-wage industry, and
the overwhelming obstacles of inadequate transportation facilities.
That was yesterday.
Gone are the shackles.
Gone are the limitations.
Gone are the overwhelming obstacles.
North Carolina is on the move and we intend to stay on the
move.
We are on the move because the leaders have drawn their
strength from the people in a state which requires her leaders
to stay close to her people.
We are on the move because we have put our fundamental
faith in universal education.
We are on the move because we are making the most of the
natural resources God has given us, and because we are driving
hard to lift our agricultural and industrial income.
We are going to continue to put our faith in these funda-
^*W. Kerr Scott (1896-1958), Governor, 1949-1953, farmer, champion of agrarian
causes as farm agent, Grange leader. State Commissioner of Agriculture, 1936-1948.
As Governor, he expanded state services in such areas as health, education facilities,
transportation and communication, especially in rural areas. Crabtree, North Caro-
lina Governors, 131-132.
Luther Hartwell Hodges (1898- ), industrialist from Leaksville, civic leader
and public servant, Lieutenant Governor, 1952-1954. Following Governor Umstead's
death, he succeeded to the governorship, and was elected in his own right to the
next term, 1956-1960. Appointed Secretary of Commerce by President Kennedy,
1961. Crabtree, North Carolina Governors, 134-135; William S. Powell (ed.) , North
Carolina Lives: The Tar Heel Who's Who (Hopkinsville, Kentucky: Historical
Record Association, 1962) , 606-607, hereinafter cited as Powell, North Carolina
Lives.
6
Papers of Terry Sanford
mentals: universal education, supporting, and supported by, a
stronger economy.
I am not going to rely on dire statistics to prove my deter-
mination to lift the quality of education and to broaden the
opportunities of earning a better living. Instead I am going to
rely on faith. We have come a long way from a beginning which
rose out of the ashes of disaster and despair.
We all are proud of our universal education. But now, in the
closing decades of the twentieth century, ^ve must do more than
merely make education universal. We must give our children
the quality of education ^vhich they need to keep up in this
rapidly advancing, scientific, complex world. They must be pre-
pared to compete with the best in the nation, and I dedicate my
public life to the proposition that their education must be of a
quality which is second to none. A second-rate education for our
children can only mean a second-rate future for North Carolina.
Quality education is the foundation of economic development,
of democracy, of the needs and hopes of the nation. Quality
education put in its bleakest terms is survival. In its brightest
terms, it is life, and growth, and happiness.
I have already detailed my program for quality education in
North Carolina. It is a model program which represents the best
thinking in the education field. Already it has received national
attention and comment. We are confident that this is the program
that the children of North Carolina need.
If it takes more taxes to give our children this quality education,
we must face that fact and provide the money. We must never
lose sight of the fact that our children are our best investment.
This is no age for the faint of heart.
I believe that the people of this state will rise in boldness and
will go for^vard in determination that ^ve have chosen wisely
when we base our future hopes on quality education. I need
your help, your understanding, your firmness of purpose, and
your hard work if we are to achieve this goal.
While quality education is the rock upon which I will build
the house of my administration, we are not going to fall into the
error of thinking that this, or any other single emphasis, will
alone build a better North Carolina.
Education supports the economy but education must be sup-
ported by the economy. As we ^vork for quality in education we
must at the same time work just as boldly for broader opportuni-
ties to lift the income of our people.
Our goal is not only full development of the talents of our
children, but also the creation of an expanding economy which
will give everyone a better chance to make a better living.
1) -H
5J
2
£^
O c/5
^ c
T3 O
% 6
.<
XI O
s s
o
The Governor and his family were photographed in the Mansion in 1961.
Terry, Jr., the Governor and his wife, Margaret Rose, and their daughter,
Betsy, are shown in this family picture.
Inaugural Address
7
I see for us three points of greatest economic emphasis: lifting
farm income; expanding industry and developing new industry;
and properly using, conserving, and developing our water re-
sources, which we have been given in such abundance, and which
in turn will contribute to the industrial and agricultural pursuits.
I promise these next four years will demonstrate that I believe
in the future of farming and that I have carried on with the Ken-
Scott fervor.
I promise these next four years will demonstrate that I believe
in the potential of industrial development and that I have carried
on with the Luther Hodges energy.
And with this fervor and energy I pray that I will always carry
on with the faith of Aycock and Gardner and all the other
governors of North Carolina whose leadership and love have
brought North Carolina to its new day.
As we work here to build a better state, we will also do our
part to build a better nation.
Today we stand at the head of the South, but that is not
enough. I want North Carolina to move into the mainstream
of America and to strive to become the leading state of the
nation. We can do it.
As the dynamic leadership of President John F. Kennedy moves
us into the New Frontiers of a changing world, we will accept
for North Carolina our responsibilities as citizens of the most
powerful nation in the world, the last, best hope of the free world.
We pledge to march with President Kennedy.
When the story is written it will be said that North Carolina
did its part, that North Carolina contributed to the peoples of
the world in the unending struggle for world peace and world
understanding.
We can do this by appreciating that we are a leading part of
the leading free nation of the free world, and that everything we
do reflects good or bad upon that leadership. We can do this by
appreciating that if America is to be strong for its job of leader-
ship, then it is up to us to make North Carolina strong for its
important part of that leadership. Quality education and a
stronger economy thereby take on added significance of a most
sobering nature.
In our segment of the free world. North Carolina will conquer,
settle, and civilize the New Frontiers. While we are observing
the big responsibilities, we will not forget the total responsibilities.
If we achieve prosperity, prosperity will not harden our hearts.
We are not going to forget the progress we have made in the
treatment and care of the mentally ill and the mentally deficient.
We will improve our program and facilities which already stand
8
Papers of Terry Sanford
with the most enlightened and advanced in America.
We are not going to forget the ill, the old, the dependent, the
helpless, the handicapped.
We are not going to forget the modernization of our programs
for penal institutions and juvenile correctional institutions.
We are going to find more effective ways to reduce the slaughter
on our highways.
We are not going to forget the working man, the laborer, the
small businessman, who often find the cards being stacked against
them.
We are not going to forget the importance of our libraries,
our symphony, our dramas, our art museums.
We are not going to forget, as we move into the challenging
and demanding years ahead, that no group of our citizens can be
denied the right to participate in the opportunities of first-class
citizenship. Let us extend North Carolina's well-known spirit of
moderation and goodwill, of mutual respect and understanding,
in order that our energies and our resources, our abilities and
our ^vills, may be directed toward building a better and more
fruitful life for all the people of our state.
I stand firmly in the footprints of Aycock when he chose the
creed for North Carolina:
I would have the strong to bear the burdens of the weak and to lift them
up and make them strong, teaching men everywhere that real strength con-
sists not in serving ourselves, but in doing for others.
All these things can be done, but they cannot be done in bitter-
ness of factional strife. We need the help of all people of goodwill.
I promise not to look back to past partisan differences, but to
keep my eyes forward on the hopes and goals of North Carolina.
If we work together for the common good, then all things are
possible.
The General Assembly, the Council of State, the school people,
the administrative officers, the state employees across the state
can help move North Carolina forward, but they are powerless
without the support and goodwill of the entire citizenry.
I call on all of us to put aside partisan differences, to turn our
backs on those things which divide us and join hands on those
things which can help us grow great. I promise to do this.
North Carolina is on the march. We are going forward. We
will continue to march forward.
I pledge to North Carolina my devotion, my time and my
energies, the full measure of all that there is within me to move
in the faith of our fathers for a future bright with promise.
I call on all citizens to join with me in the audacious adventure
of making North Carolina all it can and ought to be.
MESSAGES TO JOINT SESSIONS
OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY
MESSAGES TO JOINT SESSIONS OF
THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY
[Governor Sanford delivered two addresses to the joint sessions of the
House of Representatives and the Senate during 1961 and four during 1963.
When an extra session of the General Assembly convened in October, 1963,
the Governor again addressed the legislators in joint session. All these
messages were delivered by the Governor in person. They are printed in the
Journal of the Senate of the General Assembly of the State of North Caro-
lina, Session 1961, pp. 11-22, 73-79; the Journal of the House of Representa-
tives of the General Assembly of the State of North Carolina, Session 1961 ,
pp. 19-31, 123-129; the Journal of the Senate . . . , 1963, pp. 16-38, 39-44, 191-
195, 386-389; the Journal of the House of Representatives . . . , 1963, pp. 20-
46, 49-54, 307-311, 625-628. The journals of proceedings of the 1963 special
session are included in the 1963 volumes. Governor Sanford's message to the
special session is found on pages 799-800 of the Senate Journal and on pages
13-15 of the Extra Session section at the back of the House Journal.
In addition, routine messages concerning appointments were sent to the
Senate and the House by the Governor (pp. 535-536, Senate Journal, 1961,
and 241-242, Senate Journal, 1963; pp. 458-459, House Journal, 1961, and
565-567, House Journal, 1963). A special message was sent to the Senate con-
cerning the resignation of Representative John W. Umstead {Senate Jour-
nal, 1963, p. 112). Messages on tax reduction {Senate Journal, 1963, p. 46,
and House Journal, 1963, p. 72) and the Trade Fair {Senate Journal, 1963,
p. 87, and House Journal, 1963, pp. 143-144) were sent by Governor Sanford
to the legislators.]
BUDGET MESSAGE TO THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY
February 9, 1961
[In his first message to the General Assembly, Governor Sanford out-
lined needs of the state and stressed the need for adequate financial support
to assure a new day for North Carolina. He dissected the budget prepared
by the Advisory Budget Commission, concluding that additional funds were
needed. He told the legislators that he would discuss the matter of addi-
tional revenue at a later time. Reaction was mixed, but the representatives
and senators on the whole reacted favorably. At least three members of the
Advisory Budget Commission were themselves convinced of the need and
soon joined in efforts to provide funds beyond their own initial recommenda-
tions.]
INTRODUCTION
Under the Executive Budget Act, it is the responsibility and
privilege of the Governor to come before you at this time and
set forth the financial policy and program of the state for the
next biennium in the form of a recommended budget.
"Budgets," said the great British Prime Minister Gladstone
three-quarters of a century ago, "are not merely matters of
arithmetic, but in a thousand ways go to the root of the prosperity
of individuals, interrelations of classes, and the strength of
12
Papers of Terry Sanford
kingdoms." This statement belongs among the truths that are
eternal.
The consideration and adoption of the State Budget is the
heaviest single responsibility that rests upon you as the repre-
sentatives of the people of North Carolina. All that our state is,
and all that we hope her to become, is closely tied to the budgets
which have been and ^vill be adopted by the legislature over the
years. It is in this light that I urge you to consider all budget
proposals— not merely as dollars to be collected and spent, but
as a plan for providing the public services which the citizens of
this enlightened state need, can afford, and should have. The
budget is the most powerful tool available to you with which to
fashion and carry out sound state governmental policy, and
thereby to promote the well-being of our citizens.
Look about us, where North Carolina is strong today, our
budgets have been strong in the past. \Vhere North Carolina lags
today, our budgets have needed and today need strengthening.
W^e have not ahv^ays been able to do all that ^ve needed to do to
strengthen our state in major respects; but our past progress is
a firm foundation upon which, with our increasing ability to
afford improved public services, we can build for the future.
In dealing with such a broad and complicated subject as our
state budget, I will have to speak at this time in somewhat sum-
mary form. I am, however, attaching to your copies of this message
the Budget Report of my predecessor, Governor Luther H.
Hodges, and the Advisory Budget Commission. The Budget
Report explains very fully the budget recommendations, and I
urge that you read it carefully before you go into the details of
budget requests and recommendations. From that report you
can quickly obtain a view of the budget as a whole that will
make the details much more meaningful to you.
I am also submitting herewith copies of all of the budget docu-
ments. These are in four volumes: the "A" Budget, the "B"
Budget, the Capital Improvement Budget, and the Budget Digest.
These documents contain the specific requests and recommended
appropriations for every agency and institution.
The Budget Report ^vas signed by the Director of the Budget,
all six members of the Advisory Budget Commission, the Director
of Administration, and the Acting State Budget Officer. I am sure
that they gave careful consideration to the requests and needs
of all of the state's institutions and agencies and apportioned the
estimated available funds in accordance with their best judgment.
I commend them for a job well done. I know that more time and
effort have been expended on this recommended budget than on
any previous budget in our history. I thank all state employees
Messages to the General Assembly
13
who assisted in its preparation for their faithful service to the
state of North Carolina.
I especially express the gratitude of the state of North Carolina
to J. K. Doughton/^ distinguished public servant, splendid gentle-
man, who with thoroughness and with vision led the deliberations
of his able associates, O. Arthur Kirkman,^"^ J. William Cope-
land,i8 H. Clifton Bluc^^ Clyde H. Harriss,^^ and Joe C. Eagles,
Jr.,21 all of whom labored long in the public interest.
It was my privilege to attend nearly all of the hearings before
the Governor and Advisory Budget Commission. Under the
Constitution and the Executive Budget Act, however, responsi-
bility for the preparation of this budget rested entirely with the
previous administration.
Given the decision of those responsible for preparing this
budget to limit their recommendations to the income which exist-
ing revenue sources will yield, this is a good budget. Generally,
I approve it. It is a forward-looking budget, and provides a sound
base upon which to build toward a new day in North Carolina.
There are, however, a few important areas in which I am
convinced that this budget must be increased. In a relatively
short time I shall come before you with additional recommenda-
tions for strengthening the budget at certain points, particularly
in its provisions for education. At that time I shall also recom-
mend to you specific measures for obtaining the additional
revenue which my appropriation recommendations will require.
In the meantime, I commend the proposed budget to you. It
is worthy of the most careful analysis and the soundest judgment
you can give it. Ultimate responsibility for the adoption of the
budget rests solely with the General Assembly. In the exercise of
your independent judgment, you may see fit to increase appropri-
" James Kemp Doughton (1884- ) , farmer, banker from Sparta, representative
in General Assembly, 1949-1955, Speaker of the State House of Representatives,
1957. North Carolina Manual, 1957 (Raleigh: Office of the Secretary of State, 1957) ,
479, hereinafter cited as North Carolina Manual.
" O. Arthur Kirkman (1900- ), railroad executive, bank official from High
Point, representative in House of Representatives, 1949-1951, state senator, 1953-
1959. North Carolina Manual, 1939, 483-484.
"James William Copeland (1914- ), lawyer, judge, legislator from Woodland,
state senator, 1951-1953, 1957-1959, Legislative Counsel to Governor Sanford, 1961,
and special judge of Superior Court since 1961. Powell, North Carolina Lives, 285.
" Herbert Clifton Blue (1910- ), publisher and public servant from Aberdeen,
representative in the General Assembly since 1947, Speaker of the State House of
Representatives, 1963. North Carolina Manual, 1963, 554.
2° Clyde Hampton Harriss, Sr. (1902- ), businessman, insurance agent, farmer
from Salisbury, representative in the General Assembly, 1955-1963. North Caro-
lina Manual, 1963, 579.
^Joseph Colin Eagles, Jr. (1910- ) , tobacconist and farmer from Wilson, state
senator in General Assembly, 1949, 1951, 1957, and 1961. North Carolina Manual,
1961, 478.
14
Papers of Terry Sanford
ations beyond those recommended; or you may see fit to reduce
recommended appropriations. Throughout your deliberations,
bear in mind that the Executive Budget Act, and responsible
management of the state's finances, require a balanced budget at
all times.
Throughout the remainder of this message, I shall have occasion
to mention many figures. In the interest of simplicity, I shall
round off dollar figures and percentage figures and shall talk in
terms of biennial, rather than annual, revenue and appropriations.
FISCAL CONDITION
I find the state of North Carolina today to be in sound fiscal
condition.
We shall begin the next biennium with a very substantial
General Fund credit balance of $53 million. Improved economic
conditions and resulting General Fund revenue increases account
for $42 million of this credit balance, while the remaining $11
million will come from savings effected by keeping expenditures
below appropriations. And, let me make it clear now that the
budget recommendations already provide for the expenditure of
this $53 million General Fund credit balance.
The Highway Fund will on July 1, 1961, have an estimated
balance of $26 million in state funds and $32 million in federal
funds. This total Highway Fund balance of $58 million is fully
committed and is not available for appropriation in addition to
budget recommendations.
The gross debt of the state is $253.5 million, with an additional
$11.5 million in bonds authorized but not yet issued. Of this
total, $37 million is fully provided for by sinking funds and
$106 million of secondary-road bonds are serviced by a 1-cent-
per-gallon gasoline tax. Thus, for all practical purposes the net
debt of the state is the $120 million in outstanding General Fund
bonds issued since 1949.
THE TOTAL STATE BUDGET
The resources estimated to be available for expenditure by the
state during the 1961-1963 biennium total $1,496 million. Rec-
ommended appropriations of $1,455 million will leave an esti-
mated credit balance on June 30, 1963, of $42 million, nearly
all of which is committed to specific purposes, such as highway
construction and debt service.
The figures just mentioned include all receipts— state tax and
other revenues, bond proceeds, federal funds, and agency receipts.
They include, also, all proposed appropriations for current
operations and for capital improvements.
Messages to the General Assembly
15
Our budget is organized into three major operating funds—
the General Fund, Highway Fund, and Agriculture Fund— and
several smaller special funds earmarked to finance specific pro-
grams. Because their size dwarfs all others, I shall concentrate on
the General Fund and Highway Fund in the remainder of what
I shall have to say today.
THE GENERAL FUND
General Fund resources for the coming biennium, after exclud-
ing federal funds and agency receipts, are estimated at $747
million. This sum consists of an estimated $53 million in begin-
ning credit balance, recommended capital improvement bond
issue proceeds of $54 million, and current revenues of $640
million.
Recommended General Fund appropriations total $747 million,
of which $689 million is for current operations and $58 million is
for capital improvements. The estimated credit balance on June
30, 1963, will be only $15,000.
I take note of the fact that this budget proposes that the state
spend on current General Fund operations during the 1961-1963
biennium $49 million more than the state is expected to receive
in General Fund revenue during that period. The budget is kept
in balance by spending all of the $53 million credit balance
accumulated during the 1959-1961 biennium.
If the expectations of the makers of this budget hold true, there
will be no comparable credit balance with which to begin the
1963-1965 biennium. This means that we will leave difficult
problems for the 1963 General Assembly in maintaining the level
of services under the "A" Budget.
REVENUE
General Fund revenue for the current biennium is estimated
at $620 million. For the next biennium, General Fund revenue
is estimated at $640 million, an apparent increase of only $20
million, or 3 per cent. Budgets, however, must be built upon
revenue which is expected to come in year after year. As you
know, revenue for the current biennium includes $28 million
in "windfall" receipts resulting from the adoption of the income
tax withholding system two years ago. This $28 million can be
spent but once and will not come again. Deducting those "wind-
fall" receipts gives 1959-1961 General Fund revenue collections
of a recurring type in the sum of $592 million. By comparison
with that figure, the $640 million in revenue projected for the
1961-1963 biennium represents an increase of $59 million, or 8
per cent.
16
Papers of Terry Sanford
In view of the exceptionally good General Fund revenue col-
lections of this biennium in comparison with 1957-1959, there
may be a strong temptation in some quarters to argue that an
8 per cent General Fund revenue increase is too conservative,
and that additional appropriations can be provided for by the
painless expedient of raising the revenue estimates. The Advisory
Budget Commission does not, and I do not, and dare not, share
that hope. On the basis of all the evidence now available, includ-
ing general economic conditions and trends and the relatively
conservative revenue growth estimates now being made by the
federal government and by our sister states— averaging less than
4 per cent— I see no present justification for raising the Advisory
Budget Commission's 8 per cent revenue increase estimate. To
take any other position would be dangerous and would border
upon fiscal irresponsibility. Should new information cause a
change in this view while you are in session, I shall so advise you.
APPROPRIATIONS
Requests for General Fund appropriations for current opera-
tions during the coming biennium totaled $783 million, and
88 per cent of that amount is recommended for appropriation.
Recommended General Fund appropriations of $689 million
constitute an increase in current operation appropriations of
$103 million, or nearly 18 per cent above comparable expendi-
tures for the current biennium.
"A" Budget recommendations for maintaining present services
at existing levels, with suitable allowance for the increased
number of people to be served, are $626 million, virtually the full
sum requested. This is an increase of more than $40 million
above current expenditures. "B" Budget recommendations, pro-
viding for improved services, new programs, and salary increases,
total $61 million in comparison with the $156 million requested.
General Fund capital improvements requests added up to $105
million. The budget recommends the appropriation of $58 mil-
lion for capital improvements, of which $4 million will be pro-
vided from current revenue, $6 million from bonds to be issued
on legislative authorization, and $48 million from bonds to be
issued on approval of the voters of the state.
The budget is arranged into about a dozen major functional
groupings: education, public welfare, corrections, debt service,
and the like. The budget of each agency and institution will be
found under the appropriate functional heading. This enables
you, in apportioning state funds, to think primarily in terms of
the programs of public service to be performed and secondarily in
North CaroHna State Library
Raleigh
Messages to the General Assembly 17
terms of the specific agencies and institutions which will perform
them.
In discussing the provisions which this budget makes for the
various functions of state government, I shall talk more about
programs and activities than about figures, and refer you to the
appropriate budget documents for the details.
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
The general government function includes the General Assem-
bly, the Governor's Office, the courts, the fiscal control and
revenue agencies, the personnel agencies, and a few others. Recom-
mended General Fund appropriations for general government
total $24 million, up 34 per cent from current expenditures. A
large part of the increase is a $2.5 million appropriation for
administrative distribution to state agencies to continue in force
the new salary schedules adopted July 1, 1960. These salary
schedules were adopted too late for the necessary funds to be
included in the "A" Budget requests of the agencies. Other
increases in the sum of $864,000 raise the salaries of Supreme
Court justices and Superior Court judges and solicitors, and
provide for expanded activities of the Department of Revenue,
Department of Administration, and State Bureau of Investigation.
Another large item is the Contingency and Emergency Fund,
which is distributed almost entirely to agencies and institutions
outside of general government.
EDUCATION
The most important and the most expensive function of our
state government is education: support of the public schools,
maintenance of our institutions of higher education, aid to five
community colleges, operation of schools for handicapped chil-
dren, and support of the State Library, Department of Archives
and History, and several other educational and cultural under-
takings.
Recommended General Fund appropriations for the entire
education function, including a proper share of retirement con-
tributions and debt service, total $520 million. This is 75.4 per
cent of total recommended General Fund appropriations for all
purposes. While that percentage figure is down slightly from prior
years, the budget nevertheless carries an absolute increase of
$70 million, or 16 per cent, over current expenditures for
education.
For the public schools, on which the major share of state
education funds are spent, recommended appropriations total
$442 million. This is $51 million, or 13 per cent, above compar-
18
Papers of Terry Sanford
able expenditures for 1959-1961, which include the contingent
supplemental salaries voted by the General Assembly two years
The "A" Budget contains a public school appropriation in-
crease of |25 million to take care of an enrollment growth of
19,000 pupils a year and otherwise to continue current levels of
instruction and supporting services. The "B" Budget recommen-
dations provide for salary increases and other improvements in
the public schools to the extent of $40 million, which includes
$14 million to convert the contingent supplemental salaries now
being paid into a part of the continuing salary base for public
school employees.
I know that improving the salaries of public school teachers
and other school employees is of major concern to all of you.
Appropriations of $35 million, which is the greater part of the
public school budget increase, will make possible a new salary
range for public school academic teachers of $3,300 to $5,000 a
year, compared with the present range of $2,946 to $4,557 a year.
Salary increases in the same proportion are recommended for
principals, superintendents, and supervisors. Vocational teachers'
salary schedules, already higher than those of academic teachers,
are also to be increased proportionately.
In addition to salary increases, the new funds recommended
will strengthen state-level supervisory and administrative activities
in the public school system, and, in many other respects, imple-
ment the requests of the State Board of Education.
The annual rate of state support for public school libraries
is increased from $1.50 to $3.00 per pupil, and the annual state
allotment for instructional supplies is raised from $1.12 to $1.50
per pupil. Adequate provision is made for a new program for
the professional improvement of teachers, for a permanent cur-
riculum study and research program under the State Board of
Education, for the administration of the National Defense Edu-
cation Program, and for the development of vocational education
instructional materials.
Local school supervision will be improved by the addition of
twenty-five local unit supervisors to the present 256, The piogram
for mentally retarded children received the full financial support
requested.
In vocational education, the budget recommendations allow
expansion of vocational instruction and vocational rehabilitation
programs. A new agricultural technology program is recom-
mended. The nineteen industrial education centers ^vhich are
contributing so much to the industrial growth of our state will
receive $763,000 for additional equipment.
Messages to the General Assembly 19
You can readily see that public schools have not been exactly
neglected, but it has been deliberately left to us to initiate the
fulfillment of the bright promise of quality education which
holds so much for the future of our people.
The over-all increase in General Fund appropriations from
the last budget to this one is 18 per cent.
The total increase for public schools is 13 per cent.
The percentage of the total General Fund budget is 67.7 per
cent. With all that was done by this Budget Commission, and
it is considerable, we have shown little progress. In 1959-1961
the percentage of our total General Fund resources going to
public schools was 70.4 per cent. This budget, I repeat, allots
only 67.7 per cent.
So you can see that in spite of all we have done, we are losing
ground.
The programs of enrichment cannot be implemented under
this budget. At least, forgetting the small percentage differences
which can be explained away in several creditable ways, this is
pretty good evidence that we are not making the progress we
must make.
It can be argued that we can get along on this level of ap-
propriations, and we can, but at this rate we will never achieve
opportunities of education second to none.
I have talked with Governor Hodges and with the members
of the Advisory Budget Commission. They realize this budget
will not achieve the goals in education we must now reach. But
they have done the best possible within the framework of the
tax structure with which they worked, and they have properly
left to us the challenge of achieving high quality in our system of
public schools.
I am sure, I am positive, that there is contained in this budget
no implied admonition to "hold the line" at the proposed figures.
Rather, I am satisfied, I know, that it was and is expected that
this budget will serve as a "line of departure" from which we
will move to the objective of quality education to meet the
demand of a rapidly advancing, changing, scientific, complex
world.
Because of the importance of public schools, I have chosen to
talk about expanding our educational opportunities at a later
time when we can devote our attention exclusively to that
subject, and therefore I request your indulgence in allowing me
to deliver another and special message on the budget for public
education.
Turning now to higher education: Appropriations recom-
mended for the Consolidated University of North Carolina and
20
Papers of Terry Sanford
the nine other institutions of higher education total |58 million,
an increase of $12 million, or 26 per cent, beyond current ap-
propriation expenditures.
Our university and colleges now enroll 36,500 students, or
53 per cent of those attending college in this state. A further
rise of 4,000, or 1 1 per cent, is expected in the next two years.
The Advisory Budget Commission recommends as a policy
matter that college tuition rates be increased, on the ground
that the per-student cost to the state for higher education has
risen more in proportion than has the cost to the student in
tuition and fees. It is recommended that the proceeds from these
additional tuition receipts, totaling $2.2 million, be distributed
50 per cent to scholarships, 40 per cent to faculty salaries, and
10 per cent to libraries. The scholarships would offset the impact
of tuition increases on needy students.
Competition for qualified college faculty members is keen
through the nation, because college enrollment pressures are felt
nationwide. Faculty salary funds will be increased under the terms
of this budget by $3.4 million from General Fund appropriations
and an additional $900,000 from tuition increases. Distribution
of these salary funds will be left to the discretion of the adminis-
trators of the various institutions, as has been the recent practice.
The increase in higher education appropriations will, in
addition to salary raises, provide for teaching larger numbers of
students and for the purchase of additional library books and
instructional and scientific equipment.
Appropriations in aid of summer school programs at the state
institutions will be regularized by the appropriation of $960,000,
to be distributed among the institutions in proportion to hours
of summer school instruction given. Grants to community colleges
will be increased from $3.25 to $4.00 per student quarter hour
of instruction in approved courses.
HEALTH AND HOSPITALS
Appropriations recommended for health and hospitals total
$65 million, an increase of 17 per cent over current expenditures.
Most of this increase represents the cost of continuing and expand-
ing operations of the mental institutions and the training schools
for mentally retarded children and the extension and enrichment
of programs of the State Board of Health.
Funds are recommended to continue operations at the present
levels of service in Memorial Hospital at Chapel Hill, the sana-
torium system, and other state hospitals and health agencies.
Messages to the General Assembly
21
PUBLIC WELFARE
General Fund appropriation recommendations for all public
welfare activities total $25 million, an increase of 17 per cent
over current expenditures. These state appropriations together
with federal and county contributions, will provide |168 million
for public welfare. This is $18 million more than will be received
during the current biennium.
The funds recommended for public welfare will support the
caseloads and average grants projected by the state welfare
agencies in the Old Age Assistance, Aid to Dependent Children,
Aid to the Permanently and Totally Disabled, and Aid to the
Blind programs. These projections of average caseloads and
average grants are based on the continuation of recent trends,
all of which are upward except for the Old Age Assistance case-
load.
I suggest that you carefully evaluate the welfare proposals and
assure yourselves that the recommended funds are sufficient to
support reasonable increases in the public assistance programs.
CORRECTIONS
The budget recommends appropriations of $4.5 million for the
state juvenile correction program, an increase of 29 per cent over
1959-1961 expenditures.
Included are funds for the establishment of a new Juvenile
Evaluation and Treatment Center on the Moore General Hospital
property near Asheville, recently given to the state by the federal
government. This center will be used for processing and classify-
ing all students assigned by the courts to the correctional schools,
as well as for the psychiatric care and rehabilitation of difficult
cases.
The Probation Commission and Board of Paroles have here-
tofore been supported by the Highway Fund. The Budget Report
recommends their transfer to the General Fund. Moderate ap-
propriation increases are proposed for each of these agencies.
PUBLIC SAFETY AND REGULATIONS
For public safety and regulation, which includes the military
and civil defense departments as ^vell as several regulatory
agencies, appropriations of $7 million— an increase of 9 per cent
—are recommended. The increase will go chiefly to the financial
responsibility program of the Department of Motor Vehicles, the
civil defense program, and expanded activities of other regulatory
agencies.
22
Papers of Terry Sanford
NATURAL resources AND RECREATION
Appropriations recommended for natural resources and recrea-
tion are $8 million, which is 15 per cent more than current
expenditures. This increase will strengthen the programs in forest
management, industrial development, commercial fisheries re-
sources, and water resources.
AGRICULTURE
The agricultural agencies will, under the recommended budget,
receive General Fund appropriations totaling $12 million. The
increase over current expenditures is $800,000, or 7 per cent.
Included is a General Fund appropriation to the Department
of Agriculture of $2.9 million, an 18 per cent increase over
comparable current expenditures. This sum, together with a
$2.8 million appropriation from the Agriculture Fund, will fur-
nish appropriations of $5.7 million to the Department of Agri-
culture. The increases will permit improved inspectional activities
and better tax collection by the department.
Salary increases for academic personnel in the Agricultural
Experiment Station and the Cooperative Agricultural Extension
Service, both of which are administratively controlled by State
College, are included in the appropriations to the Consolidated
University of North Carolina. Modest increases are proposed in
other phases of the budgets of those agencies.
Several farms now being operated at state institutions no
longer serve their original purposes, take too much of the time
of administrative personnel, and their orderly discontinuation
is recommended.
RETIREMENT AND PENSIONS
Teachers and other state employees belong to the Teachers'
and State Employees' Retirement System. The state's contribution
to the Retirement System covers the employer's contribution for
both Social Security and the state retirement plan.
General Fund appropriations to the Retirement System will
total $46 million. The increase of 40 per cent over current
expenditures for this purpose is attributable to the normal growth
in the number of people on the state payroll, the state's contri-
bution required to match increased salaries, higher Social Security
contribution rates, and larger contributions required to keep the
Retirement System in actuarially sound condition.
DEBT SERVICE
General Fund debt service appropriation recommendations of
$25 million are 50 per cent higher than expenditures for the
Messages to the General Assembly
23
current biennium. Of the increase, $3.4 million will be required
to service the debt outstanding on July 1, 1961, and another
$4.9 million will be necessary to service the capital improvement
bonds which the budget recommends be authorized and issued.
SALARY increases
Budget recommendations for salary increases in education have
already been discussed. For full-time, permanent employees sub-
ject to the State Personnel Act, the budget provides salary in-
creases of $3 million from the General Fund and $2.85 million
from the High^vay Fund. If this amount were distributed on a
percentage basis, it would provide an across-the-board pay raise
of 3 per cent. Recommended salary increases and additional
merit salary increments combined add 7 per cent to the total
cost of salaries for this group of state employees.
CAPITAL improvements
Recommended General Fund appropriations for capital im-
provements total $58 million. These appropriations will be
financed by a direct appropriation of $4 million from current
revenues, $6 million in bonds to be issued on legislative author-
ization, and $48 million in bonds to be issued upon approval by
the legislature and a favorable vote of the people.
Nearly half of the capital improvement recommendations—
$26.5 million— is for the institutions of higher education. This
sum represents about half of the capital improvement requests
submitted by those institutions.
The voted bond issue will finance $13.5 million for expanded
state port facilities.
To relieve overcrowding of our state offices in Raleigh, the
budget provides that the State Highway Building, which was
financed from the Highway Fund, and the Highway Commission's
testing laboratory building be purchased by the General Fund
from the Highway Fund at a price of $2,365 million. The build-
ing will furnish office space for General Fund agencies. The
Highway Commission will apply the sale proceeds to the con-
struction of a new highway building in the Raleigh area.
The state has long needed an appropriate building for its very
fine archives collection and historical museum, and for its State
Library. To erect such a building, an appropriation of $2,692
million is recommended.
The Raleigh Farmers Market is currently operated by the
State Department of Agriculture on an experimental basis under
a lease contract with the owner of the facility. The lease expires
this spring. It is recommended that the state purchase the Farmers
24
Papers of Terry Sanford
Market facility at a price of |500,000, in order to continue and
improve the services which the market is rendering to the farmers
of the state.
THE HIGHWAY FUND
Highway Fund revenues are currently earmarked for the sup-
port of the State Highway Commission, the Department of Motor
Vehicles, and the State Prison Department.
All of the balance of $58 million with which the Highway Fund
will begin the next biennium is already committed. Current
revenues, state and federal, are estimated at $331 million for 1961-
1963. Recommended Highway Fund appropriations total $358
million, leaving a balance at the end of the next biennium of
$31 million, practically all of ^vhich is already reserved for debt
service and aid to municipalities.
REVENUE
Estimated Highway Fund state revenue for 1961-1963 is $295
million— or 7 per cent above current revenue. This increase rate
would have been higher, but for the depressing effect of growing
numbers of compact and small foreign cars upon gasoline con-
sumption. It is estimated that gasoline consumption during this
year will be about 1 per cent less than it would have been if no
compacts had been sold.
APPROPRIATIONS
In spite of the anticipated gain in Highway Fund state revenue,
recommended appropriations from state and federal funds com-
bined total $358 million, down $63 million— or 15 per cent—
from current expenditures. This decrease is almost wholly due
to a drop of $62 million in federal funds to be spent in 1961-1963.
Appropriations from state funds are almost identical with those
of the current biennium.
STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION
Recommended appropriations of state and federal funds to the
State Highway Commission are $317 million, which is 19 per
cent down from current expenditures. Again, this reduction is
due to a falling-off in federal construction funds.
The decrease in federal funds for highway construction comes
from the fact that in prior years North Carolina, because it was
in a position to take immediate advantage of federal interstate
system grants, received higher annual allocations for the interstate
system than are now being allocated to us. During 1961-1963,
interstate allocations and expenditures, as well as other federal
Messages to the General Assembly
25
aid funds, are likely to remain constant unless some change is
made in the present federal highway program.
DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES
Highway Fund appropriations recommended for the Depart-
ment of Motor Vehicles are $19 million, an increase of 6 per
cent over 1959-1961 expenditures. Included in the recommenda-
tions are fifty Highway Patrol clerks who will relieve fifty
patrolmen for road patrol service.
STATE PRISON DEPARTMENT
Recommended Highway Fund appropriations for the State
Prison Department are $32 million, an increase of 22 per cent
over current expenditures.
This increase of $5.6 million will provide primarily for
reduction of working hours of custodial employees from more
than sixty to forty-eight hours a week, for salary adjustments
already authorized for certain classifications of prison employees,
for expansion of rehabilitation and training activities, for im-
proved security measures, and for new programs of adult educa-
tion and vocational education for youthful offenders. A major
reorganization of the prison system, especially as to the number
and size of field units and facilities, is also contemplated by the
budget.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
Capital improvements recommendations for Highway Fund
agencies total $5.7 million, of which $2.6 million will come from
the Highway Fund and the remainder from other sources. No
bonds are proposed for these capital improvements.
The recommended appropriations will finance construction of
a new State Highway building; necessary new prison facilities;
and Highway Patrol facilities, offices, radio to^vers, and equip-
ment.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, let me say again that the recommended budget
which I have just outlined to you, and which is about to be placed
in your hands, constitutes a sound basic plan of state expenditures
for the upcoming biennium. With the additions, which I shall
shortly recommend to you, I firmly believe that it will enable us
to make a long stride toward the new day which all of us covet
for our beloved North Carolina.
Thank you.
SPECIAL MESSAGE TO THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY
March 6, 1961
[After outlining in broad terms the needs of the state, particularly in the
field of education, when he addressed the General Assembly in February,
the Governor felt it necessary to go into more detail in a later speech. In
March he appeared before another joint session to present in detail a plan
for raising needed revenues to meet what he considered pressing needs. To
carry out his program in the field of education, Governor Sanford recom-
mended the elimination of the sales tax exemption on food and other items,
effective July, 1961. He also suggested that a state-wide vote on the proposal
be held in November to determine whether the tax should be continued after
July 1, 1963. The "food tax" became the subject of debate throughout the
state before it was finally enacted into law. A day or so after the address to
the General Assembly, the Governor began receiving letters on the subject of
a food tax for education. A supporter wrote that he had resided in North
Carolina for two years and had three daughters in the public schools and
wanted "to express my wholehearted support of your recommendations for
aid to Education. I know that every ounce of your aggressiveness and deter-
mination will be required before your proposals are adopted by the legis-
lators." He concluded by saying that "The results from your program will
be better citizens for North Carolina and better Americans." Another wrote,
"I am so proud that you are Governor of my State and I want to take this
opportunity to tell you so." Despite the fact that the writer stated that she
and her husband did not have a child in school, she knew that increased
taxes would be needed and thanked the Governor "for the foresight you
have for children and the future of our state." Still another wrote, "I have
two sons, aged three and four. My wife and I want the best educational
opportunities for them that we and our state can afford. We can afford what
you have asked. If we cannot afford this minimum, we cannot afford any-
thing." This citizen promised the Governor "support ... to the very best
of our abilities and resources." Not all, however, expressed appreciation for
the Sanford proposal. About seventy mimeographed letters, individually
signed, were sent with the statement: "I am HIGHLY opposed to ANY tax
on the most essential item (food) . I thoroughly believe in higher education
and will support it 100%, but in my opinion, revenue can be obtained
from other sources. ... If this proposal becomes law, believe me— you will
BE THE MOST UNPOPULAR GOVERNOR NORTH CAROLINA EVER HAD." One Writer
asked, "How do you have the nerve, and inconsideration for the people of
N. C. to put tax on food?" Still another told the Governor, "Terry
Sanford's 'New Day' is certainly dawning in North Carolina, but instead of
bringing relief to the already over-taxed inhabitants, it is realy adding
insult to injury." In a letter addressed to the Governor, the Lieutenant Gov-
ernor, members of the General Assembly, and the Speaker of the House, an
irate citizen, after criticizing the food tax, continued by saying, "But if your
\^sic~\ will stop the hole where our tax money is being wasted, you now have
enough. The Welfare Department is one that is so large that an elephant
could fall through, and the Board of Health is in the same class. The High-
way Department is still worse. There is more tax money wasted than spent
for the good of the children. There are a good many more places that I
could name." The Governor's Office received hundreds of letters on the
subject of a food tax to support quality education after the presentation of
this address, which was televised on a state-wide network.]
Messages to the General Assembly 27
Tonight— on this sixth day of March, 1961— we must take a
deliberate, penetrating look at the future.
Tonight we must begin to swing wide the doors to the future
for our children, for beyond the threshold lie the hopes and
aspirations of not only our children but all the world's children.
The last great hope of the world is democracy as we know it;
and North Carolina must once again rally to the cause just as
it has from Kings Mountain to the Yalu River.
Today we do not take up the sword. Instead, we take up the
pen, the educational pen. We put the pen into the uncertain,
eager hands of our youth, for we know they must— and they will-
write the future history of North Carolina, and indeed of the
nation and the free world.
Any achievement by man requires sacrifice— and tonight we
must look together at a small measure of sacrifice.
I do not come to you expecting popular acclaim for what I
have to say. I do come to do my duty in full confidence that you
in turn will do your duty.
When I presented the budget to the General Assembly, I asked
that you allow me to return to recommend additional funds to
meet the basic needs for school improvement.
I have explained time and again that I believe the economic,
social, and moral development of our state depends largely on an
expanding program of quality education second to none.
I have explained time and again that I believe it is time that
North Carolina provide the opportunities that will put this state
in the front ranks of our community of states.
I have explained to you my reasons for believing that the
budget is inadequate to achieve the public education goals we
must set for our state. I am sure that it is generally acknowledged
that we have not done all we can do.
I come to you now with the most difficult decision that I have
had to make since assuming the office of Governor, and, perhaps,
the most difficult of my term of office.
I come to you now with the most difficult decision of your
service in this session.
It has not been difficult, however, to decide that something
must be done about our schools. This is obvious to all.
It has not been difficult to concede that if we want to do the job
we will have to pay for it. This is admitted by all.
Having concluded we must take decisive steps for school im-
provement, and having concluded we must have more money,
the difficult decision is what sources ^vill best distribute equitably
the costs among all the citizens of the state.
I have examined many sources and I have come to decisions
28
Papers of Terry Sanford
which I recommend to you now in the firm belief that this is the
way to move North Carolina forward— the way to swing open the
doors to our children.
I have considered every possible source of taxation, and I will
mention some of these sources which have been widely discussed.
I looked carefully at the tax on whisky, beer, and wine. Beer
and wine are already taxed at a rate which appears to me to be as
high as reasonably consistent with our regulatory responsibilities.
I have studied the effect of a recent tax increase on whisky in
Virginia, which drove the sale "to the woods" and diminished
the total receipts from this source. Therefore, I concluded that to
make the tax on whisky too high would be self-defeating and
therefore ought to be avoided. I am convinced, however, that to
increase this tax by an amount of 20 per cent of the present tax
would not reach the point of diminishing returns. Such an in-
crease from 10 per cent to 12 per cent would bring in an ad-
ditional amount of |3 million for the biennium, and therefore I
recommend this as one of our sources.
I have looked carefully at the so-called crown tax on soft
drinks. It is argued with considerable merit that there is no
more justification for a special tax on soft drinks than on an ice
cream cone, a chocolate soda, a Baby Ruth or a package of potato
chips. It is a fact that one cent on a bottle would result in taxing
soft drinks at almost double the rate we tax whisky. The states
which have adopted this source have discovered that sales diminish
and a large percentage of bottlers go out of business. Thus the
tax defeats itself. Only two states now have such a tax, and I
am advised that one of these will probably repeal the tax this
year. It seems fairer to me to tax soft drinks at the rate of 3 per
cent as a part of the regular sales tax, and this is already being
done.
A great many people have said to me that we should tax to-
bacco products, and a great many people have said we should not.
The principal reason given for putting a tax on cigarettes is that
people who smoke, whether rich or poor, can afford to pay the
tax. Representatives from over half of the counties have advised
me that they do not believe it wise to put a special tax on tobacco.
Many of them report that they pledged against such a special tax
during their campaigns for election. Many people will be sur-
prised to find such a widespread sentiment against this special
tax, and frankly I do not fully understand the sentiment. The
most logical explanation I have heard is that North Carolina is
the leading tobacco producer and the leading manufacturer, and
our leaders of the industry have the burden of fighting such
Messages to the General Assembly
29
taxes in other states, where, in many instances, they have been
levied in unfair amounts. Consequently, I do not now recommend
a special tax, but recommend that tobacco products be taxed at
the rate of 3 per cent along with other similar commodities, as is
now the case.
I have considered a state tax on real estate and other property.
Most states put the greatest burden of school support on real
estate taxes. We departed from that concept some years ago, de-
ciding to leave this source to the limited use of county and city
governments. Real estate is more static, and in time of economic
depression has little or no earning capacity, so taxation of this
source has in times past resulted in hardships and loss of farms
and other property by foreclosure. More than a quarter of a
century ago ^ve made the basic decision to tax money, rather
than property, and I oppose any change in this long-accepted
approach.
We decided then to obtain our chief support for schools and
state functions from money earned and money spent. Thus, the
sales tax, the income tax, and the gasoline tax have been the
basic support of state operations.
The income tax has been a steady, expanding source of revenue
for the state and has distributed the burden to those best able
to pay as measured by income. This is a fair and equitable tax,
but already the state is receiving substantial revenue from the
income tax, and the federal government is taxing this source al-
most to the breaking point. There is no real hope of relief from
federal taxation until the cold ^var is won, and an increase by the
state would, it must be admitted by all, be too burdensome. I
believe those best able to pay should carry the heaviest burden of
taxation, but even a casual glance at income tax rates will con-
vince you that this is already the case. Therefore, I recommend
that we do not change our rate of income tax.
I have considered two possibilities with the sales tax: an in-
crease in the rate to 31/^ per cent or 4 per cent, or a removal of
exemptions.
The sales tax is fair in distributing the costs of the state services
to all who share in these benefits. When balanced ^vith the present
income tax schedules, it is about as fair a method as possible
for distributing the costs because the more a man spends, the
more he pays in sales tax.
The chief difficulty with the present sales tax is that because of
so many assorted exemptions, it is extremely difficult to admin-
ister. It is difficult for the small merchant to know what he has
collected, what he should collect, and what he should pay in to the
30
Papers of Terry Sanford
state. It is impossible for the ordinary consumer to know what
is taxed and what is not.
Our statistics and study show that: (1) increasing the tax to 4
per cent on shoes and clothing and other items would reach ap-
proximately the same people, in the same amounts, as a tax across
the board, on all items, without exemption; and (2) we now col-
lect the lowest sales tax per capita of all the thirty-four states
having a sales tax, probably because of our many exemptions
which make administration and collection difficult.
Therefore, it is my recommendation that you remove all ex-
emptions from the sales tax.
I will submit a proposed bill which will place the tax at 3
per cent across the board, except it will place only 1 per cent on
the farm and industrial group of items and equipment used in
production, and only 2 per cent on motor vehicles with the pres-
ent top limitations. It will not tax those items such as products
of the farm sold for further processing and subsequent taxation,
and gasoline already taxed by another method.
I am well aware of the hardships of paying tax on necessary
items by those whose income is so low that every penny counts.
But I am also aware of the greater hardship placed upon the
children of these same people by inadequate school opportunities,
and I have been able to devise no way that the poorest can be
exempt from a general sales tax. Welfare payments and the dis-
tribution of free food answer this complaint raised in behalf of
the poorest among us, and the poor who do not receive these
payments, I predict, will be willing to do their share in order that
we might have a strong tax structure which will support the
schools which will give their children a better chance in life. A
patchwork tax structure, with special taxes on special items, will
not give us the kind of tax structure we must have if our schools
are to grow as our population grows.
I know that this will place extra burdens on many merchants.
However, I have no doubt about their general response. They
are responsible and civic-minded. I think that the merchants of
this state have never been given adequate praise for their par-
ticipation in the support of the needs of the people of North
Carolina. Through their efforts to make the sales tax effective
beginning in 1933, they literally saved the public schools. Now
again, they are called on to do their part in making our school
system better. I express my thanks for what they have already done
for the state and deep appreciation for what they are yet to do.
If you will authorize these taxes we will be able to take a
giant stride forward in lifting up the chances of our boys and
girls.
Messages to the General Assembly
31
We will be able to adopt the "B" Budget requests of the State
Board of Education, a group of conscientious, dedicated and pru-
dent business, professional, and civic leaders who are devoted to
the cause of education and the state of North Carolina.
There is no better informed group than your State Board of
Education. I have studied all their requests. They have carefully
balanced all of the most urgent needs, and we must have the
program they have laid before us. I recommend it to you without
reservation. It will be explained in detail at hearings before the
Joint Appropriations Committee, by the Board of Education and
Department of Public Instruction representatives.
The recommended changes in the tax structure will bring in
an estimated $83 million during the next biennium.
Meeting the budget requests of the Board of Education will
require $70 million. This will leave a balance of |13 million.
All of us have been able to take great pride in our university
and colleges. We can demonstrate that they have contributed
much beyond their cost to the life and growth and happiness of
our slate.
I would not have us slow their progress as the price of accelerat-
ing our efforts for secondary education. Rather, I know we must
continue to improve our colleges if we are to continue to prosper
and grow. The budget I presented earlier provides for substan-
tial improvements.
Each president is presenting to you requests above the Ad-
visory Budget Commission recommendations, but less than the
original "B" Budget requests. I believe that we can adjust these
figures to about |3 million and continue to have a vital, moving
program of higher education.
There will be some other urgent needs, and I recommend that
you consider adding to the proposed appropriations as already
submitted the following increases: mental hospitals, $500,000;
welfare, including a wider distribution of surplus food, $2 mil-
lion; other agencies and institutions, plus a reasonable margin
for a reserve, $3.5 million.
Through the Budget Bureau, I will consider carefully with
you the line items involved in these increases.
This will leave a balance of $4 million. I will later have a de-
tailed report for you on the status of the finances of the State
Highway Department, but I can tell you now that because of
matching federal funds there is virtually nothing left for secon-
dary road construction. This ties in with the proper consideration
of school needs, because an urgent requirement is road improve-
ment if we are to be able to move the school buses. One superin-
tendent in an adjoining county reported more than forty school
32
Papers of Terry Sanford
buses stuck in one week. I recommend that this sum of $4 million
be applied in partial support of the prison budget, that an equal
amount be released to the Highway Fund for use in urgently
needed secondary road construction.
I want to remind the professional school people what I have
said in many ways and on many occasions. I am asking the
General Assembly to ask the people to provide more adequate
financial support for the schools, but I am going to be even more
demanding of the school people for improved performance up and
down the line. If the General Assembly and the people provide
increased appropriations, then it is up to us to do our part in
improving our performance in every other respect. I propose to
work in every field of school activity to improve the level and
standard of performance. We will continue our curriculum study
and improvement, our search for methods of rewarding merit and
superior performance, our efforts to achieve all of those things we
can do without additional money. In other words, I am saying
that we realize that money is only a part of what we need to
achieve the quality we seek, and we are pledging to the people to
complete the job in every respect.
I realize the task of the public servant is never easy and fre-
quently extremely difficult. I know, however, that you are here
because of an abiding desire to serve the cause of democracy, and
I know that your presence here involves a personal financial
sacrifice in every instance.
You Tvill receive some good advice, some bad advice, some fair
and some unfair pressure. I know that you realize this is part of
the price of public service, and that you will take it all, good and
bad, without complaint.
Over t^vo years ago at Durham I outlined my hope that the
people would become so interested in education that they would
demand better schools and would be willing to support this ef-
fort. I said then that I wanted some way to get the people in-
volved, concerned, excited, and ready to go to work to achieve
quality education.
The quality we seek cannot be delivered by the General As-
sembly, although only you can start the march. Quality is com-
plex, difficult, constant in required attention; and it will demand
the best in effort by school boards, the state agencies, the super-
intendents, the principals, the teachers, the parents, the students,
and indeed all of the citizens of the state. And this is no single-
shot affair. It will require attention year after year after year. It is,
as Admiral Rickover points out, "an essential civic duty for
every intelligent and educated person, for every person with deep
love of his country and her children, to participate in the public
Messages to the General Assembly
33
debate on education. . . . there is no valid reason why the United
States cannot have the best school system in the world."
I would like to see every citizen understand the need and the
problem, caught up and taking part, willing not only to supply
the money but anxious to supply the continuing interest without
which our expenditures will have been in vain.
I think I know how we can obtain this interest and continuing
support.
I recommend that you enact the tax revision I have suggested,
that the new schedule become effective July 1, 1961, for the com-
ing biennium, and that the proposition be submitted to a vote of
the people next fall to determine whether this tax and level of
support will be continued after July 1, 1963.
As we start this mighty crusade, the first and fundamental de-
cision should be supported by all of the people. We should give
notice that every person is involved. We should demonstrate
that we are united, and that we will continue our dedication un-
til we lead the nation in school opportunities for our children.
In this way you are not "passing the buck." We are simply
asking all the people to join with us.
I have faith in the vision of our people. If you will do this, I
will join with you this fall in carrying our crusade to every county
in this state.
In this way the people will understand what we are doing, will
participate in our decisions, and we in North Carolina will be
ready to move.
In reaching the decisions I have outlined today, I have been
guided in my deliberations by my trust in people and my faith in
the Divine Power without whose help no human endeavor can
succeed. As I turn these decisions over to you, I leave with you
the refrain that has in these past weeks occupied my mind. It
comes from a well-known hymn:
Grant us wisdom,
Grant us courage,
For the facing of this hour.
The hour is at hand when North Carolina can begin its bold
march forward. We begin this march in these halls by reaching
out and grasping the hands of our priceless possession, our chil-
dren and our grandchildren.
The hand we grasp today is the strong handclasp to the future,
the hand of a leader in the world's struggles.
I thank you for your attention to the future of North Carolina.
BIENNIAL MESSAGE
February 1, 1963
[Governor Sanford was the first governor to address the General Assembly
in the new Legislative Building. Rather than read his message, he distrib-
uted copies to the legislators for their reference as he "talked" with them
for thirty minutes about the comprehensive and creative programs for the
new biennium. This "State of the State" message was carried on state-wide
television and radio.]
Mr. President, Mr. Speaker, and Members of the General As-
sembly of North Carolina:
This occasion is a historic one for the reason that this is the
first session to meet in the beautiful new Legislative Building.
This, building will long be the pride of North Carolina, a symbol
recalling our sturdy history and our important future.
Further, this is an important occasion for me because I come
to meet you as a group for the first time.
I look forward to our joint venture in the cause of North
Carolina progress. You follow the most constructive General As-
sembly in the history of our state; and I am glad to see that so
many of the men and women of vision and courage who set this
high mark last time are back here today to begin another session.
The accomplishments of the 1961 General Assembly were
marked by an optimistic awareness that North Carolina had
reached the point in history when we could do many more things
toward providing better chances in life for all of our people.
On their record you have the opportunity to build an even
greater record of service and dedication.
You will hear some whisperings abroad saying that we have
done enough, have moved well and far and rapidly, and so it is
time now to slow down, rest, and catch our breath.
These whispers come from the fearful and timid who have
always opposed the accomplishments from which they now would
rest. This cannot be and is not the spirit of North Carolina. We
are moving Tvisely and firmly. Much remains to be done, to pro-
vide better educational opportunities for the competition our
children will surely face, to encourage broader economic de-
velopment so everybody will have a better chance to make a
better living. Now is the time to move forward. Now is no time
to loaf along.
I do not intend to present the "Governor's Program." I intend
to say to you that there is much to be done, that the opportuni-
ties are here as never before, and that I pledge to work with you
Messages to the General Assembly
35
to achieve the good things in life which are ours for the reaching.
You know, as well as I, that the last two years have seen many
gains, much progress. The next two can see even more.
You know, as well as I, that the last decade has brought more
advances than any in our history. The next decade can double
these advances.
In almost all fields, in almost all sections, in almost all pro-
grams, the heartbeat of North Carolina is healthy, and is getting
stronger all the time.
SCIENCE
We are not neglecting any of the other broad concerns of our
people when we conclude that science will have more influence
than ever before in the future of our state.
Science in its broadest meaning of interrelated disciplines is
the secret of future development as it unfolds the secrets of space
and man and earth.
Our responsibility cannot be fulfilled by a legislative act or a
simple appropriation, or the best of intentions.
It starts with the first grade. It involves all business. It radiates
from graduate schools. It finds strength in faculties, in the Re-
search Triangle, in the attitudes of people, in industry, in agricul-
ture, in government.
We already have the Governor's Scientific Advisory Committee,
made up of leading scholars. With their guidance, adding to them
groups of leaders in every field, plotting the course, we are at-
tempting to enter the age of science with wisdom and under-
standing.
AGRICULTURE
In agriculture, Commissioner L. Y. Ballentine^^ continues to
furnish the drive needed for consumer protection and the vision
required for agricultural development.
Technology in producing, processing, and packaging products
has considerably increased the variety and volume and the need
for vigilance in carrying out the department's responsibilities
for protecting the health and pocketbook of consumers.
There is not a man, woman, or child in North Carolina who
does not derive benefit from the service and regulatory programs
^Lynton Yates Ballentine (1899-1964), dairy farmer from Varina and Raleigh,
active in agrarian and civic groups such as the Agriculture Foundation of North
Carolina State College, Raleigh Kiwanis Club, and the Grange; politically active as
state senator, 1937-1943, Lieutenant Governor and Chairman of Board of Education,
1945-1949, State Commissioner of Agriculture from 1948 until his death in 1964.
Powell, North Carolina Lives, 59; Governor Sanford's statement issued July 19, 1964.
36
Papers of Terry Sanford
of one or more of the department's sixteen divisions.
Of the new programs authorized by the last session of the
General Assembly and initiated by the department during this
biennium, none has been of more vital importance to every
citizen of the state than the compulsory meat and poultry inspec-
tion, assuring wholesome and healthful food.
Another important new addition to the Department of Agri-
culture during the past biennium was state purchase of the
Farmers Market at Raleigh. Purchased under a self-liquidating
agreement and operated on its own revenues at no cost to the tax-
payer, this facility is making a major contribution not only to
North Carolina agriculture, but also to North Carolina consumers
through the increased quantity and enhanced quality of fresh
produce made available to them the year round.
Working in partnership with the Department of Agriculture is
the School of Agriculture, which Dean H. Brooks James-^ has
made even more effective in public service.
The Agricultural Opportunities Program provides a blueprint
for all agencies, organizations, and groups to assist in increasing
farm income; providing adequate markets and facilities, including
processing; and improving family and community living through
education.
A Department of Food Science and Processing has been created
at State College; and the development of the food processing in-
dustrv is an important part of the Conservation and Development
program and is a major part of all related state agencies as we
embark on a planned goal to make North Carolina the food sup-
plier for the nation. Food processing is now one of our major
projects.
The Agricultural Extension Service's "1.6 in '66" Program
was developed from 100 countv programs. We called on the Ex-
tension Advisory Boards in each countv to work with the exten-
sion staff, and thus more than 1,500 farmers directly developed
this approach to ne^v income, and thousands more contributed
to it indirectlv.
Extension home economics agents, the 4-H Club program, the
FFA, the community and area development activities indicate
that farm life and economy are on the move.
Research in the departments of the School of Agriculture and
the North Carolina A.gricultural Experiment Station will reduce
* Herman Brooks James (1912- ) , educator, author; Dean of the School of
Agriculture at North Carolina State University since 1960. Albert Nelson Marquis
and Others (eds.j , Who's Who in America: A Dictionary of Notable Living Men
and Wo?7ien (Chicago: A. N. Marquis Company. 1898— [annually]) , XXXIII, 1012.
hereinafter cited as Who's Who in America.
Messages to the General Assembly
37
the cost of production and improve the product through the elim-
ination of the many hazards of plant and animal diseases, insects,
weeds, and weather.
The levels of living will be limited only by the imagination
of the researchers. Much is going on to make farming more val-
uable to everybody in the state.
COMMERCIAL FISHERIES
Still another food resource of great importance is our commer-
cial fishing industry. We are seeking greater use through food
processing.
Our Conservation and Development Department director re-
cently toured the coastal area to discuss the problems of commer-
cial fishermen. Rigid and frozen conservation practices would im-
pose hardships, and inadequate conservation measures would be
disastrous for the future. We are continually striving for that
program that will insure wise use of this resource; and our
Commercial Fisheries Division considers itself the advocate and
protector of the person who draws his living from the commercial
waters.
TOURISTS
Any time we speak of our resources in North Carolina, we can-
not overlook the fact that North Carolina is a natural vacation
state. The variety of our attractions, from mountains to coast,
are unequaled. Last year more than 25 million travelers visited
our state. In 1961 some 75,450 people were employed in 18,600
travel-serving industries which had a gross income of $888 mil-
lion. As our third largest dollar-producing industry, we must
continue to give our increased support to this enterprise.
ROADS AND HIGHWAYS
Good roads help the tourist business, and also business, agri-
culture, and industry profit from roads.
The most significant road-building achievement in the past two
years has been in the over-all improvement of secondary roads in ^
North Carolina. A total of $15 million was spent in 1961, most
of it after July of that year; and in 1962, $36 million was ex-
pended, representing the largest expenditure since the Scott bond
issue. In 1962 over 1,100 miles of secondary roads were stabilized
and 900 miles paved.
I would point out to you that these funds for secondary roads
were squeezed out by a better budget arrangement and careful
management. Adequate appropriations are not available to build
38
Papers of Terry Sanford
as rapidly as we should. We will continue to do all that we can
to improve as much secondary mileage as possible with existing
revenues.
The primary and the interstate systems were not neglected.
North Carolina is one of the leaders in the nation in terms of
the amount of interstate system open to traffic.
In 1962 a total of 2,569 miles of highway work was let to con-
tract at a total value of over $66 million dollars, representing the
largest single year's work in the highway history of North Caro-
lina.
There are many other reasons for being proud of your Highway
Commission and Highway Department under the direction of
Chairman Merrill Evans^^ and Director W. F. Babcock.^^ Traffic
engineering for safety is being expanded to save lives. New re-
search has been set up to save us money and make our operations
more effective. Plans are being made for advance right-of-way
acquisition which will prevent blockage of future highway proj-
ects. Our Advance Planning Unit is considered one of the finest
in the nation.
Finally the basic problem is money. Ten per cent of all state
highway mileage in America is in the North Carolina system,
and we support it on 3 per cent of the highway taxes collected.
With all of the money directed toward highways and no longer
supporting the prisons and other such agencies, the best possible
analysis of our highway system indicates that we are still falling
approximately $25 million a year behind in our construction
program; and this means primary, urban, and secondary roads.
I am convinced that an improved highway system promotes
the economy in such a way that it pays for itself, and that the
investments we make in better roads will be returned.
You will also receive legislation dealing with roadside bill-
boards, and these certainly need proper control.
industrial development
The past two years have been eventful ones for the continued
economic growth of North Carolina. This growth has been high-
lighted especially by our industrial expansion.
Growth of our industrial labor force and gains to the payrolls
of our wage earners have also been significant for 1961-1962.
2* Merrill Evans (1904- ), farm supply and life insurance dealer from Ahoskie,
former county commissioner and member of the General Assembly, Chairman of
State Highway Commission, 1961. North Carolina Manual, 1963, 464.
^Willard Farrington Babcock (1917- ), engineering professor and consultant
from Raleigh, author of professional publications. Director of Highways since
1959. North Carolina Manual, 1963, 480.
Messages to the General Assembly
39
Gross gains to our working force in industry have been over 60,000
persons and wage gains have been some $200 million.
Secretary of State Thad Eure^^ has authorized more new cor-
porations during the past two years than at any other similar
period in the history of the state. During 1961 and 1962, 6,133
new domestic corporations were organized. Seven hundred ninety-
six corporations from other states were domesticated to do busi-
ness in North Carolina.
In 1961 our per capita income scored a 5 per cent gain over
the average for 1960. Comparable figures for 1962 are not yet
available, but it is believed there will be some gain over 1961.
Hargrove Bowles^^ and Robert Stallings^^ have provided vivid
and vigorous leadership.
The full weight of our industrial education program is now
beginning to be felt in our promotion efforts. Our Department
of Conservation and Development states, ^vithout reservation,
that the industrial education program, and in fact the state's
total new efforts tow^ard improving education, represent one of
the most effective promotional tools ever provided.
The developers over the state are anxious to learn what new and
effective things this legislature will do to assist the program. They
and we know that some of our closest competitors are girding
themselves to do serious battle with us on every worthwhile
project contemplated for the Southeast.
We must not follow in the steps of some states in the nation
that make unrealistic concessions to industry. We cannot, how-
ever, because ^ve are leading, afford to become staid and self-
satisfied. We stri\'e constantly to improve our attractiveness to
reputable business. Those factors which hinder our economic
growth in competition with other areas must be corrected or we
will miss some of the progress which would naturally come our
way.
I especially solicit your thinking and advice on how we might
keep this progress moving for the benefit of all of our people.
schools
Since the General Assembly was last here much progress has
*'Thad Eure (1899- ), lawyer from Winton, former mayor of Winton and
representative from Hertford County, Secretary of State of North Carolina since
1936. North Carolina Manual, 1963, 448-449.
'"Hargrove Bowles, Jr. (1919- ) , insurance executive and industrial developer
from Greensboro; appointed Director of Conservation and Development by Gov-
ernor Sanford in January, 1961. North Carolina Manual, 1961, 413.
^ Robert L. Stallings (1912- ) , businessman, former mayor of New Bern; ap-
pointed Director of Conservation and Development, August, 1962, by Governor San-
ford. North Carolina Manual, 1963, 462-463.
40
Papers of Terry Sanford
been made in our schools. State Superintendent Charles F. Car-
roll and State Board Chairman Dallas Herring^^ are leading
the way.
The most dramatic change has been the beginning of a new life
in education across the state, in large counties and little ones.
Teachers are working harder, stretching for new ideas, doing a
better job day by day, exhibiting a high morale and a higher sense
of duty and dedication.
More smart and dedicated young people than ever before are
choosing teaching as a career. More new teachers, graduating
from our colleges, are staying in North Carolina to teach.
More consolidation, more improvement in courses of study,
fewer dropouts, more dedication from principals, greater interest
by parents, are positive signs of progress. Along with the em-
phasis by our state, there has been great new help from the coun-
ties and districts, where ultimate responsibility lies. I am pleased
to see so much local interest and work, for without this we can-
not make much progress. We must urge even greater local sup-
port.
Students, the key and the purpose of all your efforts, are show-
ing that they realize studying is important, that learning is going
to mean so much in their lives. They are serious but, with the
full enthusiasm of youth, are giving a new dimension to our
schools. Student leadership is meaning more than ever. Your ef-
forts and faith are being well rewarded by students who have
come to full understanding that there is no place tomorrow for
the uneducated brain or the untrained skill.
School administrators are seeking new ways, better methods,
fresh ideas, to make the most of the human resources of the state.
When we first decided to accelerate our school efforts, I pointed
out that there is no magic button, there is no easy way, that our
sustained efforts for about ten years would be required to reach
the top, and then full steam would be necessary to keep us there.
All over this nation. North Carolina is recognized as a foremost
leader in new effort for better schools. Other states are looking,
asking, following, and maybe getting ahead of us.
This is no time to get smug. When I asked the last General
Assembly for new money, I said I would be just as demanding
^ Charles Fisher Carroll (1900- ) , educator and civic leader from Williams-
ton; member of Southern Regional Education Board, North Carolina Recreation
Commission, and North Carolina Symphony Society; Superintendent of Public
Instruction of North Carolina since 1952. North Carolina Manual, 1963, 452-453.
^"William Dallas Herring (1916- ), manufacturer; educational, religious and
political leader; former mayor of Rose Hill; Chairman of North Carolina Board
of Education since 1957. Powell, North Carolina Lives, 593-594.
Messages to the General Assembly
41
of teachers and school people. I have tried to do this and will
continue. There is plenty of room for improvement in teachers,
school principals, school systems, superintendents, board mem-
bers, and governors. We know it, and we will try to find that
improvement.
There is also need for continued legislative support, and the
budget requests of the State Board of Education are realistic and
reasonable.
We are moving, moving in the right direction. If we keep up
this rate of effort and improvement and support through this
session, and the next two, the General Assembly arriving at this
statehouse in February of 1969 should find that North Carolina
has a school system equal to the best in the nation.
TALENTED CHILDREN
In the age when excellence is in demand, we have a rapidly
expanding public school program to seek out and challenge un-
usual talent. Last year, 2,065 students were involved, and this
year 5,206 are taking part, and next year, it will reach far more.
In addition, we have established a summer school for talented
high school juniors and seniors to be held at Salem College, to
give incentive and recognition to excellence throughout the
state. This project, the first of its kind, has national significance.
It will be supported for three years by a grant from the Carnegie
Foundation and Winston-Salem individuals, companies, and
foundations.
RETARDED CHILDREN
We have never given proper attention to children with limited
ability. I appointed a special commission last year to outline
a state program in this field. I will later ask you to make this
a permanent commission, and will present to you the very
thoughtful suggestions the program presented.
EDUCATIONAL TELEVISION
We expect to utilize television in education to the best
possible extent. Last year I set up a special study committee and
already we are actively seeking complete coverage for all parts
of the state. This approach holds great promise for the improve-
ment of quality in instruction.
EMPLOYMENT
As a state, we are concerned with employment, and the Em-
ployment Security Commission's role is almost wholly concerned
42
Papers of Terry Sanford
with activities designed to promote fuller use of the state's man-
power resources.
North Carolina's rate of insured unemployment during the
biennium remained consistently below the national average.
A low average industrial wage has disturbed us until we analyze
it, and we find the reasons are more good than bad. We now have
40,000 people in needlework averaging $1.32 per hour, which
pulls down our total average. A few years ago, however, we did
not have these jobs now held largely by displaced farm people,
and it must be admitted that $1.32 is far better than unemploy-
ment. We will, however, continue to do everything possible to
improve the chances our people have to earn a better living.
The total wage payments to insured workers rose between the
first half of 1960 and first half of 1962 by more than 13 per cent,
meaning that the 1962 payroll for these workers will be $3.8 bil-
lion as compared with 1960 earnings of less than $3.3 billion.
We paid out $82 million in insurance to unemployed, which
did much to relieve the distress of those experiencing unemploy-
ment and served as a cushion to bolster the North Carolina pro-
gram.
Our employment security trust fund increased by $7 million,
and all indications are that North Carolina's program remains
one of the most solvent in the nation.
There are certain minor amendments and adjustments to be
made, including increasing the benefits in certain cases.
As a state, we have a responsibility of helping find jobs. The
Chairman of the Employment Security Commission, Colonel
Henry E. Kendall,^^ has taken the lead in this. We take it as our
mission to reduce substantially unemployment, and we are work-
ing in that direction.
labor
Frank Crane,^^ Commissioner of Labor, has brought exceptional
skill to his assignment.
Labor-management relations continued on their traditional
even keel, with relatively few strikes and low totals of lost
man-hours. North Carolina's record of industrial peace and pro-
ductivity is one of the best in the nation.
Henry E. Kendall (1905- ), engineer, civic leader, World War II veteran
from Raleigh; appointed Chairman of Employment Security Commission, July, 1946,
and since reappointed by Governors Scott, Umstead, Hodges, and Sanford. North
Carolina Manual, 1963, 463-464.
32 Frank Crane (1907- ) , public servant from Raleigh; former safety director
of the North Carolina Industrial Commission and administrative assistant of the
North Carolina Employment Service; State Commissioner of Labor since 1954.
North Carolina Manual, 1963, 455.
Messages to the General Assembly
43
We have just come through a year of record growth.
The state has received national publicity and recognition for
its achievement in industrial safety.
The North Carolina Minimum Wage Law is well accepted now,
and it appears appropriate to increase the 75-cent minimum set
by the 1959 statute to a figure more in keeping with present-day
economic realities. I hope you will consider this favorably, and
I hope it might be raised to $1.00.
This would substantially help the earnings of many thousands
of our fellow citizens and would boost the entire economy.
workmen's compensation
Chairman J. W. Bean^^ of the Industrial Commission and his
associates are administering the Workmen's Compensation Law
with great efficiency and with fairness to all.
The percentage of injuries has been decreasing, but the em-
ployment in industrial plants has been increasing and thus the
caseload is growing.
It is likely that the coverage and maximum amounts provided
in the statutes are no longer adequate, and I would hope you
would give some consideration to adjusting these provisions.
senate redistricting
There are some other specific things we need to do during
this session.
The Constitution requires that the Senate be redistricted. It
is just that simple, and we need to get on with the job.
I hope also you will consider a constitutional amendment which
will make this automatic in the future, as we provided in the case
of House reapportionment in the last session and elections.
insurance laws
North Carolina is known nationally as a state of honest and
fair insurance law administration, with the chief passion being
the complete protection of the public. We need some tightening
up here and there and we can count on Commissioner Edwin S.
Lanier^^ to present sound proposals to us.
"J. W. Bean (1893- ), educator; railroad official from Raleigh; public official
in various capacities under Governors Hodges, Scott, Cherry, Broughton, and Hoey;
Chairman of North Carolina Industrial Commission since 1954. North Carolina
Manual, 1963, 465.
Edwin Sidney Lanier (1901- ), public official from Raleigh; former mayor
of Chapel Hill, county commissioner, state senator, and North Carolina Personnel
Director; appointed Commissioner of Insurance, 1962. North Carolina Manual, 1963,
456.
44
Papers of Terry Sanford
ELECTION LAWS
Our elections are honest but in some cases the absentee ballot
provisions have been abused. Chairman William Joslin^^ has
proposed sound changes for your consideration.
SCHOOL BOARDS
School boards and school committees are a key to success of
our hopes in achieving a new quality in our schools. We must
attempt to devise several methods of selection which will diminish
partisan attitudes, and I am thinking about nonpartisan rather
than bipartisan attitudes. We need to attract the best possible
citizens to these jobs.
MIGRANT LABOR
The Governor's Committee on Agricultural Migrants approved
and sponsored a bill in the 1961 General Assembly which author-
ized minimum sanitation standards in labor camps. This bill
failed to pass. It was decided to prepare such minimum stand-
ards, which would be followed on a co-operative basis with the
Employment Security Commission, the local health departments,
and local growers. These standards were approved by the Gov-
ernor's committee and released to the press December, 1961. We
are doing many other things on a voluntary basis.
Many growers co-operated in 1962, and 202 permits were
issued by the local health departments in contrast to 147 issued
during 1961.
A number of new camps were constructed and physical im-
provements were made but many continued to operate without
adequate sanitation protection.
We should consider legislation for minimum protection of
migrant workers.
PUBLIC HEALTH
Most public health programs are necessarily of an ongoing
nature to undergird continually the total health of the citizens
of North Carolina, and Dr. J. W. R. Norton,3« State Health
"^William Joslin (1920- ), attorney from Raleigh; former law clerk to
United States Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black, member of General Statutes
Commission, associate city attorney; Chairman of State Board of Elections since
1962. Governor Sanford's news release of July 31, 1962.
'•'John William Roy Norton (1898- ), physician from Raleigh, State Health
Director since 1948, member of North Carolina Conference of Social Service, con-
sultant to Surgeon General's Committee on Mental Health; author of professional
articles. North Carolina Manual, 1963, 476-479.
Messages to the General Assembly
45
Officer, and many associates are to be commended for their dili-
gence.
Our state has maintained its outstanding record in the control
of communicable disease. This is especially true in poliomyelitis
in which the 1959 total of 277 paralytic cases with twenty deaths
was cut down to nine cases in 1961 with one death and to eleven
cases in 1962 with no deaths.
Remarkable progress can be seen in the control of diphtheria
and typhoid fever.
Progress in the control of whooping cough is also encouraging.
Influenza, however, is still largely uncontrolled with epidem-
ics occurring every two to three years.
The board constantly monitors for radiation fallout and is
prepared for wide-scale operation in an emergency.
Aid to counties is a pressing need at the present time in order
to enable local health departments to add sufficient staff to cope
with immediate public health problems.
We will have presented for our consideration legislation
authorizing the State Board of Health to intensify its study of
the air pollution problem in the state and to encourage adoption
of measures to abate these hazards. ,
the sanatorium system
Tuberculosis is treated in four sanatoriums: McCain, Black
Mountain, Wilson, and the Gravely Sanatorium at Chapel Hill.
The system is extremely well administered under Dr. Henry
Stuart Willis, Superintendent and Medical Director,^^ and Ben H.
Clark, Administrator.^^ Costs of operation compare most favor-
ably.
Treatment has improved remarkably. The average stay in 1950
was sixteen months; now it is less than seven months.
There is a slight increase in admissions with a drug-resistant
bacilli which could create serious future problems. There is also
a shift in the age of the patients with the largest group now
being elderly people, and this also could create some future
problems. Both of these situations could cause increased costs
in the next biennium which we cannot now anticipate.
To determine just where we stand, I appointed an Advisory
2^ Henry Stuart Willis (1891- ), physician from Chapel Hill; Superintendent
and Medical Director of North Carolina Sanatorium System since 1947; Clinical
Professor of Medicine at the University of North Carolina since 1959. Powell,
North Carolina Lives, 1318.
^ Ben H. Clark, Administrator of North Carolina Sanatorium System from Chapel
Hill; member of Governor's Committee on Tuberculosis. Governor Sanford's news
release of November 10, 1961.
46
Papers of Terry Sanford
Committee on Tuberculosis and the members have just made
a report. This indicates there is still much work to be done in
public health and other areas and we are taking the recom-
mended steps.
ATOMIC ENERGY
The use of atomic energy will have growing meaning for the
people of this state, and its regulation, development, and con-
trol are supervised and co-ordinated by a group of businessmen,
educators, and public employees constituting the North Caro-
lina Atomic Energy Advisory Committee.
We have six subcommittees— Agriculture, Medicine and Public
Health, Education and Research, Power, Industry and Labor, and
Radiation Standards— all concerning themselves with vital prob-
lems.
A number of state institutions and agencies are involved with
the problems and opportunities of atomic energy, and industrial
development will be assisted by our clear understanding of the
possibilities.
The committee has recommended for our consideration cer-
tain legislative action, which I believe would be of benefit to
us, especially relating to regulation, licensing, and supervision.
SPACE TECHNOLOGY
Space projects have not naturally sought North Carolina be-
cause we were not located to provide a launching site and did
not have the basic aircraft industry, but there will be many
things we can contribute to the exploration of space secrets, and
many benefits we can derive from this contribution. Right now
we are working on a program which will do just this.
The development of stronger departments in engineering and
the physical sciences is a major effort, and these and related fields
must receive our complete support as we chart our course into
a century of technology and change.
We are going to continue to drive to develop the educational
contributions to the atomic and space age, drawing together the
brains and resources of industry, business, education, and govern-
ment to plan our place in this fantastic future.
UTILITIES
The regulation of utilities is under the chairmanship of Harry
T. Westcott,^^ who is doing a conscientious and able job, along
2» Harry Tracy Westcott (1906- ), marketing specialist, North Carolina De-
partment of Agriculture; appointed by Governor Scott as member of Utilities
Commission, 1950; accepted chairmanship, 1958. North Carolina Manual, 1963,
470-471.
Messages to the General Assembly
47
with his colleagues.
At his suggestion, I recommended that a thorough study be
made to bring our utilities laws up to date and this has now
been done.
I hasten to point out to you and for the record the facts we
point out almost daily to industrial prospects. Statistics disclose
that our electric rates, with the exception of several relatively
small areas, are well below the national average; residential rates
are 10 per cent lower, and commercial and industrial rates are
25 per cent to 30 per cent lower. North Carolina rates are lower
than those in our neighboring states. In the past two years the
generating capacity has been increased from 3,624,983 kilowatts
to 4,435,833 kilowatts, and this is dramatic proof of economic
growth.
The number of telephones in service in North Carolina is
increasing at the rate of approximately 65,000 per year. Held
orders have decreased from 37,000 in 1954 to less than 3,000 at
present.
The present commission operating under the present laws has
done an outstanding job, and this fact is so recognized at the
national level.
Give them clearer laws and they will do an even better job.
We need a full-time legal advocate for the public.
We need a full-time expert representing the public.
There is a need to define the lines between the private com-
panies and the co-operatives. We need to change the method of
increasing rates under bond prior to any hearing.
There is need to have a workable and understandable rate-
making law, protecting the public and fair to the companies.
The General Statutes Commission will present a report and
recommendations to you, and in addition you will have available
the study made by Mr. Edward Hipp"^^ and the recommendations
of our own Utilities Commission.
RURAL ELECTRIFICATION
The North Carolina Rural Electrification Authority, under
the chairmanship of Gwyn B. Price,^^ has successfully promoted
an expansion program which now has 98 per cent coverage in
Edward B. Hipp, lawyer, public official from Raleigh; served as attorney to
Utilities Commission since 1963. Information supplied by Utilities Commission
personnel.
*^ Gwyn B. Price (1900- ) , farmer from Warrensville; member of Farmers
Cooperative Council of North Carolina; Director, Farmers Cooperative Exchange;
leader in State Grange; Chairman, North Carolina Rural Electrification Authority
smce 1941. North Carolina Manual, 1963, 496.
48
Papers of Terry Sanford
dependable electric service and dependable telephone service for
50 per cent of our rural people, reaching 212,000 consumer
members.
The growing problem of duplication of service must be solved
with fairness to all, especially the rate payer, and this will be one
of our jobs during this session.
MENTAL HOSPITALS
The North Carolina mental care system is not only in the
mainstream of America; John Umstead*^ has put it in the first
flotilla, and the professional leadership of Dr. Eugene Hargrove*^
will keep us setting an example for the rest of the nation.
To a great extent our potential rests with the mental health
of our people. We have risen above the old concept of custodial
care. Our philosophy now, rising from the public attitude and
spirit and promoted by professional knowledge, is treatment and
rehabilitation.
While yearly admissions have risen extraordinarily, the aver-
age daily population of the hospital has almost leveled off. For
the first time, this halts a rise in resident population which has
been going on since the establishment of the hospitals. This has
been accomplished, of course, only by the discharge rate keeping
pace with admissions which means a much more active treatment
program within our hospitals.
We are requesting support for additional research.
The guideline for the future in North Carolina is the develop-
ment of an integrated, comprehensive patient-family-community
oriented system of care for major and minor mental disturbances,
including mental retardation.
You will also be asked to consider the establishment of a men-
tal health department which will expand the scope of services.
North Carolina is in a position to play a leading role in a
national trend toward the maximum realization of human re-
sources through research, training, and service in the mental
health field.
MUSIC
The North Carolina Symphony, under the leadership of our
John Wesley Umstead, Jr. (1889- ) , Democratic leader from Orange County;
insurance agent active in various affairs of the state: University Board of Trustees,
Hospitals Board of Control, Grange, Masonic Order, legislator, 1931, 1939, 1941-
1961. North Carolina Manual, 1961, 562-563.
« Eugene Alexander Hargrove (1918- ) , physician, specializing in psychiatry,
from Raleigh; member of American Medical Association; Clinical Professor of
Psychiatry at the University of North Carolina; author of many professional
articles. North Carolina Manual, 1963, 492-493.
Messages to the General Assembly
49
imaginative pioneer, Dr. Benjamin Swalin/^ adds to the enrich-
ment of the education of our children across the state, as it pres-
ently begins its eighteenth annual tour. We must assure the
permanent establishment of the symphony.
DRAMA
The outdoor dramas, a North Carolina creation, give us a first
ranking position and add to the appeal to tourists and the en-
joyment of our citizens.
ART
The North Carolina Museum of Art continues to amaze visi-
tors, influence industrial prospects, enrich the lives of our young
people, and reflect credit on our state.
Dr. Justus Bier, Director,^'^ internationally recognized, has car-
ried on his work with great skill and imagination. The exhibi-
tion on Tilmann Riemenschneider last fall, supported by the
governments of France, the Netherlands, and West Germany,
was a tremendous success with our people, and widely reported
in popular as well as in art periodicals. Life magazine, for exam-
ple, devoted eight full-color pages to the North Carolina exhibi-
tion and carried one of the exhibition sculptures on the cover
of its Latin American edition.
During the year the Kress Foundation turned over to the state
the title to the seventy-two works of art valued at $2.5 million.
The total value of our collection is about $7.5 million.
TRAFFIC SAFETY
We continue to be disturbed by the national increase in traflic
accidents. One of our positive accomplishments has been the
establishment of the privately-endowed North Carolina Traflic
Safety Council, which is digging hard for solutions.
I have already outlined publicly a program which I think will
save some lives. All of our experience in this and other states
indicates drastic action is necessary if you really want to reduce
injuries and fatalities. I will send you a special message relating
to this problem.
Benjamin Franklin Swalin (1901- ), violinist, Associate Professor of Music
at the University of North Carolina, 1935-1949; Director of North Carolina Sym-
phony Orchestra since 1949. Powell, North Carolina Lives, 1195.
*^ Justus Bier (1899- ), art professional from Germany; member of Inter-
national Art Critics Association; Fulbright Fellow, University of Wurzburg; art
editor and critic; Director, North Carolina Museum of Art since 1961. North
Carolina Manual, 1963, 489-490.
50
Papers of Terry San ford
COURT IMPROVEMENT
The people voted for the amendments to improve the admin-
istration of justice.
Appropriate research material for legislation is being prepared
by a committee of representatives of the General Assembly, the
Bar Association, the Judicial Council, and the public. This will
be presented to your proper committees for guidance in deter-
mining what actions might be taken this year. I think the public
expects us to start implementation.
In addition, the Judicial Council will make meritorious rec-
ommendations for the general improvement of the courts and
court procedure.
STATE PERSONNEL
Personnel Administration has made continuing progress in the
past two years, and is now under the direction of Walter E.
Fuller,^^ an able civil servant. In this area, continued progress
and accomplishments are of utmost importance, not only to rec-
ognize fairly the many capable and conscientious employees of
the state, but also to meet the future needs for competent man-
agement and leadership. The dynamic nature of state government
makes it imperative that we maintain an employment atmosphere
attractive to the highest caliber of well-trained and qualified
career employees; more emphasis will be needed on the develop-
ment and training of our personnel.
A longevity pay plan, as provided by the Enabling Act passed
by the last legislature, has iDeen adopted by the State Personnel
Council, and I have recommended that the State Personnel Coun-
cil study the feasibility of increasing these payments.
Contrary to the belief of many, there are a good number of
state employees who do not enjoy the commonly referred to
standard work week of forty hours. Significant improvements
have been made; for example, in our mental institutions some
900 employees have had their working hours reduced since July
7, 1961. On January I, 1962, the hours of custodial employees of
the Prison Department were reduced from sixty to forty-eight
hours. Five years ago these employees worked seventy-two hours
per week. The objective is to get and keep better guards, and
you can see the quality of the work reflected in the reduction in
hours.
*" Walter Erwin Fuller (1912- ), agriculturist, farm and civic leader from
Louisburg; former Assistant Director, Department of Conservation and Develop-
ment; State Personnel Director, 1962-1963; Director of Department of Water
Resources, 1964. Governor Sanford's news release of December 10, 1963.
Messages to the General Assembly
51
The 1961 Appropriation Act included a salary adjustment
fund for each of the two years. During the past two years, the
State Personnel Council has authorized salary range revisions
for some 200 classes of positions which included approximately
8,000 employees.
Although this is not in the budget, we need a continuation of
a salary adjustment fund to be provided in the 1963-1965 budget.
You will receive requests for across-the-board salary increases
which are not set forth in the budget. You will receive requests
for higher salaries for professional personnel. I recommend that
the joint appropriations committee study these three problems
so that we might reach fair and equitable decisions.
COUNTY GOVERNMENT
I am pleased to report much success in the co-operation be-
tween state government and the 100 counties.
The state and the counties are partners in the financing of
public schools, in the financing of community colleges, in the
support of industrial education centers, in the administration
and financing of public welfare and public health, in library
operation, hospital construction, and agriculture extension. We
work with them in the development of plans for roads and water
resources and many other programs.
Last year I was privileged to attend their national meeting
and observed that most other states look to North Carolina as a
model of co-operation which they hope to achieve.
We have sought the advice and suggestions of county officials
in all things relating to joint responsibilities, and they have been
most co-operative and helpful.
We shall continue to seek their assistance, and shall continue
to furnish advice available to us and to assist them in every pos-
sible way in the discharge of their responsibilities.
We cannot hope to make progress unless county officials are
willing to do their share, to accept their responsibilities, and to
lead out in education and other programs vital to the future of
our people.
CITIES AND TOWNS
Thirty years ago only 25 per cent of our citizens lived in town.
Now it is 40 per cent. In the perspective of history, it will be but
an instant before a majority of North Carolinians are city resi-
dents.
As people crowd together, their problems multiply geomet-
rically, and they need help.
There are three ways in which the state can assist: (1) with
52
Papers of Terry San ford
money; (2) with enabling legislation; and (3) with planning
and advisory services. I propose action in all three categories.
There is a way in which the state can give financial aid and
save itself money. I have instructed the Highway Department
to set up a revolving fund for the advance acquisition of high-
way rights-of-way. Where future thoroughfares are engineered,
the state can use its money to purchase and hold rights-of-way,
protection of open spaces, tightening of Powell Bill procedures,
and other changes which should help the towns and cities.
Finally, we can give all the cities a point of contact in state
government where they can receive planning advice, economic
development assistance, and find an advocate with federal agen-
cies.
COMMUNITY PLANNING
In striving for the economic and educational growth of our
people, I know that we must always be aware that rapid growth
brings not only benefits but also problems.
To cope with these problems of development in a sound and
orderly manner, sound planning principles must be employed.
Our larger cities are meeting the problem by employing profes-
sional planning staffs. Our smaller communities, however, often
lack the financial resources to do this even though the problems
confronting them are not less acute than those of the larger
cities.
In recognition of this problem, the General Assembly of 1957
authorized the creation of a Division of Community Planning
within the structure of the Department of Conservation and De-
velopment. Since its activation, the division has concentrated
its efforts in the smaller municipalities and counties having
populations of less than 50,000 persons. After the first full year's
operation, in late 1958, the division was serving only four mu-
nicipalities. Now, some four years later, sixty-seven municipali-
ties and eleven counties are being served, and additional com-
munities are being added to the list as rapidly as assistance can
be provided.
We can avoid the crowded cities, the slums, the breeders of
crime and disorder, by making planning a part of our growth.
recreation
The North Carolina Recreation Commission under the lead-
ership of Ralph J. Andrews,*"^ its imaginative director, primarily
Ralph James Andrews (1906- ), park executive from Raleigh; leader in
various professional activities, including the American Recreation Society, Ameri-
can Red Cross, and North Carolina Travel Council; since 1950, State Director of
Recreation. North Carolina Manual, 1963, 485.
Messages to the General Assembly
53
is in the business of furnishing advice and stimulus to public,
private, and commercial recreation interests throughout the
whole state.
North Carolina of the future will need vast recreational facil-
ities. People will be living in more crowded conditions— predic-
tions have been made that we will have one vast city ranging
from the Research Triangle to Charlotte— leisure time is a cer-
tainty, and more millions will be traveling to "Variety Vacation-
land" for recreation.
Only a few years ago, we were giving little or no attention to
the development of recreation; now it is suddenly important.
We have asked the North Carolina Recreation Commission to
draw together all agencies directly or indirectly concerned with
recreation, and to plan now for the 1980's.
forests
We are doing much with our natural resources and, of equal
importance, are practicing conservation measures that will en-
hance their value for future generations.
Management practices and fire-control programs of our forest
land make us a leader in these programs in the Southeast. The
assistance being rendered to woodland owners by our State For-
est Service continues to be of considerable value to local economy
and our forest tree seedling program is helping to insure an
abundant growth of trees for the future. Some 43 million seed-
lings will be sold this year, and increased interest in the program
indicates even greater distribution for the coming years.
The serious loss of woodlands from forest fires has been re-
duced through modern fire-fighting techniques and equipment.
During the past two years the average size of our forest fires has
been reduced drastically and the percentage of protected acreage
actually burned has been brought to a new low figure.
PARKS
We must not ignore the preservation and protection for the
benefit of our people those things of our natural and native sur-
roundings that are so much a part of the beauty and history of
our state. Over the past two years state parks were visited by
more than 3.25 million people, an all-time high attendance fig-
ure. As our state continues to grow economically and industrially,
the demand for park facilities will increase rapidly. During the
past two years two new areas have been added to bring to thir-
teen our total of state parks.
We also have been expanding greatly the facilities at Kerr
54
Papers of Terry Sanford
Reservoir under the Kerr Reservoir Development Commission.
The North Carolina National Park, Parkway and Forest De-
velopment Commission concerns itself with the development of
the Great Smoky Mountains National Park, the Blue Ridge
Parkway, and the North Carolina National Forests. This spring
we have called a conference on outdoor recreation in the Appa-
lachians which should be of great help in the development of
western North Carolina.
The Hatteras National Seashore Park Commission is concerned
with the development and promotion of the greatest seashore
park in the country.
We need to plan today for adequate parks for the future.
WILDLIFE
The Wildlife Resources Commission is supported from hunt-
ing and fishing license fees and certain federal funds.
Headed by Clyde P. Patton, Executive Director,^^ we have a
program of intensive fish and game management building for the
present use and protecting for the future use.
WATER RESOURCES
Water resources development in North Carolina has gained
momentum rapidly during the current biennium under the di-
rection of Harry E. Brown.^^
Steps aimed at full development of major river basins for
purposes of water supply, water quality improvement, flood con-
trol, navigation, irrigation, and recreation are moving steadily
ahead.
The completion of the W. Kerr Scott Reservoir on the Yadkin
River will provide for future industrial development, for flood
control, and many advantages including the growing demand
for recreation facilities.
Similar possibilities are included in the 100-year plan for the
comprehensive development of the Cape Fear Basin which is
now under consideration by Congress.
Similar studies for the Neuse will be ready in 1963, and for
the Upper French Broad in 1965. Surveys for the Catawba, New,
and French Broad river basins are in progress. Similar studies
Clyde Pharr Patton (1913- ) , biologist, author, civic leader from Raleigh;
Director, North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission since 1948. North Carolina
Manual, 1963, 498.
Harry Emerson Brown (1898- ) , industrial engineer and World Wars I and
II veteran from Raleigh; former administrator of Department of Conservation and
Development; Director of Department of Water Resources, 1961-1964. North Caro-
lina Manual, 1963, 486-487; Governor Sanford's news release of December 10, 1963.
Messages to the General Assembly
55
for the Yadkin, Broad, and Tar river basins have been authorized.
Waterway development is moving forward at the fastest rate
in the state's history.
Studies of the coastline are in progress. Hurricane protection
plans for Carolina Beach, Fort Fisher, Wrightsville, and Fort
Macon are authorized by Congress. Plans for protection against
storm flooding for areas of Craven and Pamlico counties are near
completion.
The state is a partner with New Hanover County, the town of
Wrightsville Beach, and the federal government in the Saline
Water Conversion Research and Development Test Station.
North Carolina's state-wide antipollution program has made
great progress; all basins studies have been completed; thirteen
basins have been classified (90 per cent of the state's area) , leav-
ing only three which will be completed by the end of this session.
Chairman Vivian Whitfield deserves commendation.
The eroding shoreline is particularly acute. The Water Re-
sources Department and a special committee headed by Wood-
row Price^^ are making extensive studies, and will have recom-
mendations to make to you.
There will be other modest requests, but I hope you will see
the importance, the new momentum, and will work to keep us
moving rapidly to conserve and develop this great and valuable
natural resource.
STATE ports
The State Ports Authority is adding new life to the economy
of North Carolina in a way that will bring benefits for many
years. No longer are we required to look to the north and the
south for exports and imports, having some of our profits rub
off as we of necessity relied on the ports of Norfolk and Charles-
ton.
During the last biennium, we have completed a new ware-
house and equipment garage at Morehead City and have acquired
the former shipyard at Wilmington under a lease-purchase option.
We have also built at Wilmington a new T-head pier for the
purpose of handling bulk liquid cargos, and have seen new com-
panies come in to use this and other port facilities.
^ James Vivian Whitfield (1894- ), farm leader from Burgaw; former mem-
ber of United States Foreign Service; legislator, 1945-1953; Chairman, State Stream
Sanitation Committee and member of Advisory Committee on Forestry. North
Carolina Manual, 1953, 445; Governor Sanford's news release of February 21, 1962.
J^Woodrow Price, managing editor of the News and Observer from Raleigh;
Chairman of North Carolina Outer Banks Seashore Commission. Governor San-
ford's news release of August 31, 1962.
56
Papers of Terry Sanford
Ports business has increased.
We need additional berths and warehouses if we are to stay
in the competition.
Our sister states are moving rapidly. Port development is an
important segment of our total economic development, as impor-
tant as roads and airports. Our ports are fast approaching self-
support, but we need now to make the wise investments which
will keep our economy moving.
HISTORY
This is the three hundred seventy-sixth year since the birth of
Virginia Dare and the three hundredth anniversary of the Caro-
lina Charter by King Charles II, and we are going to have many
things remind us of a full and proud heritage.
We should not let this tercentenary pass without building a
hall of history. We are the only state between Pennsylvania and
the Gulf Coast without a proper place to display and preserve
our history, and our documents are in constant jeopardy in their
present temporary storage.
LIBRARY
A strong State Library, supporting local libraries, is a part of
a wise program of education, and indeed the extent of libraries
is a measure of the civilization of a people.
One example of the work is the State Library Processing Cen-
ter which orders, catalogs, processes, and delivers ready for use
books selected by participating libraries in sixty-four counties.
Consultant services, extension services, and the State Aid to Pub-
lic Libraries Fund are^examples of other assistance to local com-
munities and the very fine services directed by Mrs. Elizabeth
H. Hughey.52
We do not really have a library in the physical sense. We need
this badly if we are to develop our facility properly, and it is
believed that it should be built in conjunction with our hall of
history.
PRISONS, PAROLES, PROBATION
You are the first General Assembly in at least two decades to
be free from the responsibility of providing funds for a growing
prison population. Your Prison Department is the only one in
the nation with a decreasing population, and we expect a reduc-
°2 Elizabeth House Hughey (1916- ), State Librarian from Raleigh; member
of American Library Association, Adult Education Association of America, and
North Carolina Family Life Council. North Carolina Manual, 1963, 494-495.
Messages to the General Assembly
57
tion of more than 1,200 inmates from what the figure would
have been if the average inmate population had continued to
grow as it did from 1945 through 1961.
I am sure we are pleased when the cost of crime is reduced and
the tax-dollar is saved. The savings in human resources, gainful
employment, and the reduction in heartbreak and mental an-
guish are the most significant gains from stopping the growth
of the prison population.
Close co-operation between the Prison Department and free
community agencies and citizens in aiding alcoholics has helped
to remove many from the list of repeated offenders.
The rapid growth and remarkable success of the Work Release
Program has attracted national and international attention. This
program has not only helped to reduce the prison population by
its effectiveness as a rehabilitation measure, but has also shifted
the cost of supporting more than 1,250 work release prisoners
and their dependents from the state to the prisoners themselves.
Another especially noteworthy aspect of the Work Release
Program is the fact that court, probation, prison, parole, welfare,
and employment officials and personnel all have important func-
tions in its development and operation. Credit for and pride in
the success of this program is, therefore, widely shared.
We need to have the Work Release Law modified so that its
proven value as a pre-parole program can be extended to prison-
ers serving sentences longer than five years.
We need to expand and extend the programs and measures
conducted co-operatively by the Prison Department and the Hos-
pitals Board of Control to determine what can and should be
done for prisoners who are mentally ill or inebriates.
We need to make a comprehensive study of possible alterna-
tives for treating the alcoholic offender.
We need to encourage and facilitate co-ordination of the pro-
grams of all agencies concerned with crime prevention and con-
trol, and in this regard I commend to you the recommendations
of the Commission on Reorganization of State Government.
With rare exceptions it is far better to place a person on parole
than to give an outright discharge from prison. Parole proce-
dure provides some supervision and some help in readjustment
and makes return to prison less likely. Of the 7,000 paroled, only
1.4 per cent committed while on parole what would be termed
really serious offenses.
We need additional parole officers to do the job in the proper
manner, giving personal attention which will lessen the chances
of return to prison. Reformation of the prisoner is the most
58
Papers of Terry Sanford
important work of the Board of Paroles, and it is obvious that
Chairman Johnson Matthews^^ has made the policy work.
The financial side is no small matter. In the last two years
alone over $6 million has been saved by placing men on parole
who otherwise would have been an expense to the prison system,
and over $700,000 has been saved in welfare payments to the
families of these men. In addition, in the same period the men
on parole have earned almost $8 million on which they paid
taxes to help support the men they left in prison, to say nothing
of adding to the support of schools for their children.
Probation also has been of significant value because it gives
careful supervision to the person in trouble before he suffers the
many bad effects of being in the prison system, associating with
people who may cause additional trouble. The probation system,
under the able leadership of Charles Cohoon,^* is being used
more and more by the judges; if we are to make this work, to
redeem lives, to save money for the state, we need additional
probation supervisors.
We can supervise a man on probation or parole for a year at
the cost of keeping him in prison for one month, and records
show this person will earn his own money, pay taxes, and is less
likely to get into trouble again.
These agencies— Probation, Prison, Parole— will continue to
move forward in the twofold task of protecting the public and
rehabilitating offenders. We expect to reduce further the cost of
crime by closer guidance, expanding rehabilitation programs for
youthful offenders, alcoholics, and inmates needing medical and
psychiatric treatment, by group counseling, pre-release prepara-
tion, academic and vocational education, and the expansion of
the Work Release Program.
PUBLIC WELFARE
North Carolina is known across the nation for its progressive
public welfare program, a program which has placed great em-
phasis on a wide variety of services that help people to help them-
selves.
Despite this range of services, public welfare in North Carolina
has been marked by economy of administration.
Johnson Matthews (1899- ), lawyer. World War I veteran from Durham;
state legislator, 1927; Chairman, North Carolina Board of Paroles under Governors
Hodges and Sanford; helped set up state's Work Release Act; retired September,
1963. North Carolina Manual, 1963, 467; News and Observer (Raleigh) , March 16,
1960, hereinafter cited as News and Observer.
"William Charles Cohoon (1917- ), from Columbia; jobber of petroleum
products; former county commissioner; legislator, 1959 and 1961; Director of State
Probation Commission. North Carolina Manual, 1963, 482.
Messages to the General Assembly
59
The 1961 General Assembly strengthened the public welfare
program in a number of ways through both legislation and appro-
priations. These measures have all been implemented during
the biennium to the end that grants are slightly higher for needy
people and services are on a sounder basis.
Good as the record is, we are not doing enough in the public
welfare area. We must see to it that every child deprived of the
support and care of his parents has his basic needs for food,
clothing, and shelter met at such a level that he can in turn take
full advantage of educational opportunity and become a well-
adjusted, self-supporting adult.
We will have some good recommendations coming from the
special commission set up by the last General Assembly and
under the chairmanship of former Senator Dallas Alford.^^
We also need to turn our attention to the necessarily high cost
of medical care for the medically indigent and also for older
people no longer able to work, not medically indigent, but with
limited funds, who have worked hard all of their lives, who have
not been able to save much from limited earnings, and who face
having all of their life's savings wiped out by extended illness.
I do not believe this is socialized medicine, and I do not believe
it leads toward socialized medicine, and I do not think we can
continue to ignore the needs of these people in the face of in-
creasing medical care costs. We have a special committee working
on the implementation of Kerr-Mills legislation and will have this
available for your consideration.
SCHOOLS FOR BLIND AND DEAF
We have the State School for the Blind and Deaf at Raleigh
with Egbert N. Peeler^^ as superintendent; and in Morganton
the largest school for the deaf in the nation, under the direction
of Ben Hoffmeyer.^^
We also are in the process of building an additional school for
the deaf at Wilson under authorization of the last session of the
General Assembly. You are being asked to implement this new
school, which is much needed to provide training for children
who live in the eastern half of the state.
Dallas L. Alford, Jr., realtor, former county commissioner and state senator
from Rocky Mount; member, Governor's Commission to Study Public Welfare.
North Carolina Manual, 1961, 469; Goveror Sanford's news release of December 15,
1961.
" Egbert Noll Peeler, educator, school superintendent from Raleigh; Superinten-
dent of State School for the Blind and Deaf. Powell, North Carolina Lives, 960.
"Ben Earl Hoffmeyer (1914- ), religious and educational leader from Mor-
ganton; Superintendent of State School for the Deaf at Morganton since 1955.
Powell, North Carolina Lives, 608.
60
Papers of Terry Sanford
Also, we need to remember as we improve the public schools
that this specialized training is also a part of public education,
and should not be overlooked. These children need too the ad-
vantages of the increased appropriations which attract and hold
the best possible teachers.
COMMISSION for THE BLIND
The North Carolina State Commission for the Blind, with
H. A. Wood^^ as its able secretary, charged with all services for
the blind except the schools, has the support of volunteers to a
degree unequaled in any other state in the nation.
In rehabilitation North Carolina has led the nation for the
past fifteen years in the number of blind persons rehabilitated
into employment.
Home industries, medical services, prevention of blindness,
restoration of vision are a part of this remarkable state service.
We will ask you to strengthen these services.
VETERANS
North Carolina has ahvays made a heavy contribution in man-
power to our nation's armed forces. As evidence of this, we have
a veteran population of some 436,000 persons. There are over
96,000 veterans and dependents in North Carolina now receiving
some form of disability or death benefits, and it is significant to
note that we have about 2,000 Tar Heels who were disabled in
the so-called "peacetime" actions around the globe since Korea.
These men, together with their dependents— widows, orphans,
and aging parents who lost sons— comprise about 45 per cent of
our population. Last year alone, federal expenditures for veter-
ans in North Carolina exceeded $143 million.
For the most part, assistance in obtaining and continuing to
receive these benefits must come from outside the federal gov-
ernment. These benefits are not automatic; entitlement must be
proved. Such assistance is provided all over North Carolina
through the work of the North Carolina Veterans Commission,
headed by Collin McKinne.^^
CIVIL DEFENSE AGENCY
Recurrent international crises and the grave dangers that face
our nation in this nuclear age leave little room for doubt that
^ Henry Alton Wood (1904- ), leader in service to the blind; member of
American Association for the Blind; United States delegate, World Council for
Welfare of the Blind in Rome; North Carolina Executive Secretary of Commission
for the Blind. North Carolina Manual, 1963, 490.
°^ Collin McKinne (1921- ) , industrial engineer and civic leader from Louis-
burg; former civil defense leader; World War II veteran; appointed Director,
North Carolina Veterans Commission, 1957. North Carolina Manual, 1963, 486.
Messages to the General Assembly
61
realistic civil defense is essential to our continued well-being
and security as a free people. It is considered vital to our national
diplomacy and generally accepted as part of our American de-
fense. As such, it is vital to us as a state and as individual citizens.
North Carolina civil defense, established with a small co-
ordinating agency operating under the Governor, directed by
General Edward F. Griffin,^^ has made outstanding progress dur-
ing the biennium.
Emergency services are established with responsibilities as-
signed to twenty-seven state agencies and organizations. Training
has been conducted by many of the services at state, area, and
local levels.
Every county and 275 cities and towns in North Carolina have
named local civil defense directors. Eighty-three counties have
emergency plans written and approved, and 159 cities and towns
are covered by published plans. These plans, prepared under
supervision of the state agency, meet Department of Defense
criteria and enable the local agency to qualify for matching fed-
eral funds and government surplus property.
Nobody knows whether all these defense measures will ever
have to be used, but as long as there is any possibility that they
will be required to preserve our state and its people, the effort
to establish and maintain a state of operational readiness is fully
justified.
NATIONAL GUARD
The North Carolina National Guard is a volunteer organiza-
tion composed of citizen-soldiers who devote part of their time
to training to be ready for any state or national emergency re-
quiring the services of disciplined and armed forces.
In the event of enemy attack, the National Guard has standing
orders to mobilize immediately as a part of our civil defense plan
and will serve in the state pending its call to federal duty.
The organization consists of units of the Army and Air Na-
tional Guard located in 102 cities and towns across the state. The
Adjutant General, Claude T. Bowers,^^ is an able and experi-
enced veteran and administrator.
Financial support is provided jointly by the state and federal
~ Edward Foster Griffin (1900- ) , lawyer from Louisburg, former state senator;
Director of North Carolina Civil Defense since 1954; former president of National
Association of State Civil Defense Directors; civil defense consultant to NATO
Council Meeting, 1960. North Carolina Manual, 1963, 461-462.
«^ Claude Thomas Bowers (1899- ), civic leader from Warrenton; distributor
of petroleum products; veteran of World Wars I and II; Adjutant General of the
State National Guard since 1960. North Carolina Manual, 1963, 458-459
62
Papers of Terry Sanford
governments, with the bulk coming from national defense funds.
The field training periods conducted during 1961 and 1962
indicate that all units were in the best state of training and read-
iness ever achieved.
Notable in the achievements of the Army National Guard is
the development and implementation of a Physical Fitness Pro-
gram for all members of the Guard, developed with the assistance
of the North Carolina Recreation Commission and physical
education personnel of North Carolina State College. The chief
of the National Guard Bureau was so impressed that he request-
ed us to demonstrate the program to National Guard personnel
of all the states. This was done at conferences held in Raleigh
and Salt Lake City. As a result, the program has been adopted by
the majority of the states and North Carolina has received much
favorable comment and praise across the nation.
The National Guard is now in the process of reorganization
under the "ROAD" concept, along with regular army divisions.
This is being done in a manner which will best serve the nation-
al defense interests, which is our primary goal in the North
Carolina National Guard.
We should consider legislation authorizing the establishment
of a North Carolina State Guard on a cadre basis. A cadre thus
established, with a few volunteers in each community where Na-
tional Guard units are now located, would provide for a rapid
organization of a State Guard as a replacement for the National
Guard in the event of mobilization for national service.
MEDICAL CARE COMMISSION
We can all be proud of the accomplishments of the North
Carolina Medical Care Commission and William F. Henderson,^^
the Executive Secretary.
During the past two years the commission has approved twenty-
nine community health facility projects involving a total cost of
|34 million.
Under this program. North Carolina is leading the nation in
the number of medical projects constructed.
With the state loan program, we have attracted sixty new stu-
dents to medical careers in the mental hospitals and in the state's
rural communities.
Our programs for the future concentrate on providing ade-
quate personnel to staff our medical programs, and we are giving
«2 William Freeman Henderson (1913- ), former teacher, social service and
hospital administrator from Raleigh; professional leader currently serving as
Director of the Medical Care Commission. North Carolina Manual, 1963, 481.
Messages to the General Assembly
63
attention to attracting more people to health careers.
We are giving more attention to the development of long-term
care programs to lessen the strain on acute general hospital beds,
and to provide less costly services for the chronically infirm.
During this session, we will need to consider budget requests
to encourage local facilities for the chronically ill, to aid in build-
ing mental health clinics, and to continue the student loan pro-
grams.
JUVENILE CORRECTION
The guidance, training, and correction of juveniles who vio-
late the law are responsibilities of the state.
North Carolina now enjoys the reputation of having one of
the best correction and training programs in the nation. This is
carried out by the Board of Correction and Training under the
dedicated direction of Blaine M. Madison.^^
Six schools across the state plus the new Juvenile Evaluation
Center authorized by the last session of the General Assembly
constitute our institutions, and their success and competence are
measured by the fact that 90 per cent of the children trained
never again become involved with violations of the law.
The Juvenile Evaluation Center, providing services for the
children from the six schools with acute emotional and behavior
problems, treats those psychologically disabled, emotionally dis-
turbed, and physically handicapped.
This center is a significant forward movement toward our goal
of providing therapy for children so they can solve their prob-
lems and return to their own communities as compatible and
productive citizens.
It is not enough to rely on the correctional institution. Juve-
nile delinquency springs from many causes, and to the extent
we can work on these causes we can reduce institutional treat-
ment.
We have established the Governor's Committee on Juvenile
Delinquency and Youth Crime, bringing together all of the vari-
ous public and private agencies that can have an influence for
the good of young people. This has met with enthusiastic re-
sponse, and only last week this program was pointed out as a
model for the other forty-nine states.
HIGHER EDUCATION
Recently I had a chance to outline the position of education
^ Blaine Mark Madison, educational and welfare leader from Raleigh; author of
many professional articles; appointed Commissioner of State Board of Correction
and Training, 1956. North Carolina Manual, 1963, 491.
64
Papers of Terry Sanford
beyond the high school when I spoke at the Methodist College
in Fayetteville. This report, position, and projection was based
on the study of Irving Carlyle's^* Commission on Education Be-
yond the High School, which in itself is a landmark in higher
education in the state and nation.
The Board of Higher Education is doing an excellent job and
we are fortunate to have Dr. William C. Archie^^ as Director.
The report of the board will soon be available and distributed
to each of you, so I will not attempt to review its accomplish-
ments in this message.
North Carolina has been able to attract able men and women
to lead our institutions of higher education. President William
C. Friday,^^ the chancellors, the college presidents all are giving
outstanding leadership.
I hope you would consider four main objectives in higher
education, and if you do, I think historians will look back to
your session as the year North Carolina started getting ready
for the space age. Certainly, countless generations of boys and
girls will have their lives and opportunities made better by your
actions.
The first objective is a better definition of the university,
drawing closer together the three campuses, strengthening the
position of each, providing for the expansion to Charlotte and
other communities as they can justify professional and graduate
training, giving us one, great, strong university.
The second objective is to provide for greater co-operation
with the private colleges, assuring that the influence of this great
resource is not diminished. I have asked a special committee to
work on this and I will keep you informed.
The third objective is to enrich the program at all of our
state colleges, to prepare for the expansion which is sure to come,
and to authorize four-year colleges at Wilmington, Charlotte,
and Asheville.
The fourth objective is to establish under the Board of Edu-
Irving Edward Carlyle (1896- ), lawyer, civic and political leader from
Winston-Salem; former president of North Carolina Bar Association; member,
North Carolina Board of Public Welfare; World War I veteran; former state
legislator. Powell, North Carolina Lives, 215.
William Council Archie (1908- ) , college professor and administrator;
author of language and literature articles; Director of North Carolina Board of
Higher Education, 1961-1965. North Carolina Manual, 1963, 479; Governor San-
ford's news release of February 22, 1961.
William Clyde Friday (1920- ) , lawyer, civic leader from Chapel Hill;
President of the University of North Carolina since 1956; elected Chairman of
American Council on Education, 1964. Powell, North Carolina Lives, 463-464;
Governor Sanford's statement of October 2, 1964.
'2 -2
3 2
0 0 3 = 3
a. .9 O ^ iS
6^
b 3
' o C c o
c c 3 t;
o a.s o
Messages to the General Assembly
65
cation, in conjunction with our industrial education centers, a
system of comprehensive community colleges.
In your deliberations, you have a chance to set the philosophy
which will turn our history, as your action gives to every boy and
girl a finer chance to get ready for the competition of the space
age.
FISCAL AFFAIRS
Edwin Gill,^^ State Treasurer, an outstanding public servant,
shows why North Carolina is recognized as the state "where good
government is a habit."
He reports, "Sound fiscal policy has characterized North Caro-
lina over a period of more than sixty years. Credit, of course, for
this splendid record belongs to all of the fiscal agencies of the
State, as well as to the General Assembly itself. The fact that
our bonds are rated AAA, the highest rating given any State
bonds, reflects the fact that North Carolina has managed her
debt well, preserved a balanced budget, and carried on the gen-
eral affairs of State in a businesslike manner."
The State Auditor, Henry Bridges,^^ able guardian of public
funds, reports sound fiscal management in state government.
CONCLUSION
I have surveyed the various activities of our state government.
Each time I do this I come to see again that our government is
the people's massive, orderly effort to achieve together what no
one of us can so well achieve alone.
During these two years we have been guided by the concept
that the purpose of government is to serve the people, to assist
in progress, to lead in education and economic development, to
do it economically, efficiently, honestly, and always guided by
the best interests of our progressive people.
Progress has been made— enough to show us that much more
progress is possible.
The progress has been made with the lowest number of public
employees and the lowest per capita tax rate consistent with the
hopes and expectations of our citizens— fourth from the bottom
in employees, next to the bottom in per capita tax expenditures.
«^ Edwin Maurice Gill (1899- ), lawyer and public official from Raleigh;
veteran in state government, having held such positions as representative in the
General Assembly, gubernatorial private secretary, Commissioner of Paroles, and
Commissioner of Revenue; State Treasurer since 1953. North Carolina Manual,
1963, 450-451.
Henry Lee Bridges (1907- ) , lawyer and civic leader from Raleigh; World
War II veteran; deputy clerk in Guilford County Superior Court; State Auditor
smce 1947. North Carolina Manual, 1963, 449-450.
66
Papers of Terry Sanford
The greatest thing in North Carolina is the faith and spirit
of our people. It is that faith and spirit represented in this legis-
lature, which you exemplify as leaders of our people.
Now is the time to move forward. You and I have this joint
responsibility.
Messages to the General Assembly
67
BUDGET MESSAGE
February 8, 1963
[In a televised message on the budget, Governor Sanford incorporated
fewer figures and statistics than had been included in most budget addresses
and chose to concentrate on the "whys" and "wherefores." He analyzed the
proposed budgets for operating expenses, expanded services, and capital
improvements in the perspective of future North Carolina growth; he also
suggested the possibility of tax relief.]
I am happy to have the responsibility, imposed upon me by
the Executive Budget Act, to come before the General Assembly
to recommend the budget for the 1963-1965 biennium.
About this same time one year ago, the first memorandum was
sent out asking all state agencies to submit their budget requests
for study by the staff of the Budget Division, the Advisory Bud-
get Commission, and the Governor. This was the beginning of a
process that has consumed the time and thought of many people
over the twelve-month period which followed.
I would like to thank, on behalf of the state, the men of the
Advisory Budget Commission. As you know, four of the six
members serve in their capacity as chairmen of the House and
Senate Finance and Appropriations Committees. These members
are Representative Thomas H. Woodard,^^ who also served as
chairman; Senator James G. Stikeleather, Jr.:^^ Senator Thomas
J. White;^^ and Representative J. Shelton Wicker.'^^ addition
to these members, Senator Ralph H. Scott and Mr. David S.
Coltrane^^ and later Mr. E. D. Gaskins^^ served in the two ap-
®^ Thomas Hadley Woodard (1901-1966), president of insurance company, bank
vice-president and civic leader from Wilson; representative in the General As-
sembly, 1957-1963. North Carolina Manual, 1963, 620.
James Gudger Stikeleather, Jr. (1911- ), general insurance and real estate
dealer from Asheville; served in legislature, 1955-1963. North Carolina Manual,
1963, 546-547.
^ Thomas Jackson White (1903- ) , lawyer, public servant from Kinston;
served in legislature, 1953-1957 as representative, and 1961-1963 as state senator.
North Carolina Manual, 1963, 549-550.
"J. Shelton Wicker (1917- ) , wholesale gas and oil jobber, civic leader from
Sanford; representative in the General Assembly, 1953-1963. North Carolina Man-
ual, 1963, 617-618.
Ralph H. Scott (1903- ) , president of Melville Dairy, civic leader from
Haw River; state senator in General Assembly, 1951-1955, 1961-1963. North Caro-
lina Manual, 1963, 543-544.
David Stanton Coltrane (1893- ), farmer, public official from Raleigh;
former Assistant Commissioner of Agriculture and Commissioner of Agriculture;
Director of North Carolina Department of Administration; Chairman of the North
Carolina Good Neighbor Council. Powell, North Carolina Lives, 273; Capus M.
Waynick, John C. Brooks, and Elsie W. Pitts (eds.) , North Carolina and the Negro
(Raleigh: North Carolina Mayors' Cooperating Committee, 1964), 257.
^^E. D. Gaskins (1912- ), President of American Bank and Trust Company
68
Papers of Terry Sanford
pointed positions. I commend these men for their devotion and
their service to North Carolina.
The first major objective in constructing the budget was to
determine what would be required in order to continue all neces-
sary state services and programs at the existing level. This, as you
know, we have come to call the "A" Budget. While the decisions
are limited to determining exactly how much will be required
to continue these services at the existing level, still much nego-
tiation and study are necessary.
The "B" Budget provides for new programs, or for improve-
ments or additions to existing programs. Of course, the "B"
Budget is limited by the amount of money available, and I can
assure you that there are many more needs than there is money
to meet those needs. Public hearings were held, and the Advisory
Budget Commission deliberated over a period of more than three
months before the final decisions were made.
The Capital Improvements Budget is the third category of
recommendations making up the total budget. These are the
requests for additional dormitories, additional hospital space,
and other capital construction. The Advisory Budget Commis-
sion went out across the state for three and one-half weeks, trav-
eling more than 1,800 miles, in order to have firsthand knowledge
of our various institutions.
The Capital Improvements Budget, like the "B" Budget, is
limited by the resources available, and the pressures of both these
areas of need had to be judged in making the final recommenda-
tions.
I am now submitting to you four documents: Volume I of the
Budget, which contains the "A" Budget; Volume II, which con-
tains the "B" Budget and certain summary statements; Volume
III, which contains the Capital Improvements Budget; and Vol-
ume IV, a digest of all three of these budgets with a number of
graphs and other illustrations.
At the front of Volume I you will find the Budget Report,
which is a very concise and yet thorough summary of the total
budget. I am not going to use the Budget Message as a mere re-
statement of the Budget Report. Rather than make that duplica-
tion, I am sure you would benefit more by studying that report
at your convenience and at length.
in Monroe; former member of State Banking Commission; member of Board of
Conservation and Development before becoming member of the Advisory Budget
Commission in 1962. Governor Sanford's statements of Tuly 23, 1962, and Tulv 16,
1963. ^ ^
Messages to the General Assembly
69
I will use this occasion to discuss and emphasize the major
decisions contained in the budget.
the general fund
Of the three major operating funds, the General Fund is the
largest (74 per cent of tax-supported funds). It finances almost
all programs other than Highway (including Motor Vehicles)
and part of Agriculture.
The General Fund derives its revenue mainly from the income
tax (40 per cent) , sales tax (36 per cent), and certain franchise
and excise taxes. There are also various agency receipts and some
federal matching funds.
I am most happy to report to you that North Carolina is in an
excellent financial condition. In 1961 our per capita income rose
by 5 per cent, while the average percentage increase for the
nation was only 2 per cent. We have had rapid growth both on
the farms and in industry. Never has there been greater confi-
dence in the economy of North Carolina.
I am happy to report we can continue to make sound progress
without thinking about new taxes, and in fact I intend to recom-
mend some tax relief.
This economic growth has produced additional revenue for
the state, mainly in the personal income tax area. Other revenues
have increased significantly, though not so dramatically as per-
sonal income. While our 1961 revenue estimates were optimistic,
they did not attempt to foresee this unusual prosperity. As a re-
sult, additional collections of revenue are now estimated to total
$77 million at the end of this biennium.
When savings from appropriated funds are added, we will have
an opening balance (also called surplus) for the coming biennium
of 1 104 million. This balance is healthy, a sign of economic
progress and economy in government, but it doesn't mean we
will have all the money we need. This compares with $74 million
surplus which we had when the last session of the General As-
sembly made up the last budget. In other words, we needed a
surplus of at least $74 million this time just to be even with the
board.
The official General Fund revenue estimates for the coming
biennium total $840,825 million. When you add the $104 million
to these estimates, we will have total General Fund resources of
$944,825 million with which to finance General Fund programs.
Against these resources we had first to determine the amount
required for the General Fund "A" Budget. This is $814 mil-
lion, to keep programs going at the existing levels of service.
70
Papers of Terry Sanford
The 1961 General Assembly appropriated $779 million for
these same programs in the present biennium. Thus you see we
expect and estimate normal growth of our existing programs to
be about 4i/^ per cent. Normal growth means that for about
every twenty-seven new students we need one more teacher and
additional supplies. It means that as the population increases
we must anticipate that more people will need hospital and other
such services.
Therefore, to keep programs operating as they now operate
we need "A" Budget expenditures from the General Fund of
$814 million, a 41/^ per cent increase. Subtract this from the
money available and we have left |131 million.
We turn now to Capital Improvements. We found that we
need to finance many construction projects. In effect, we were
faced with the needs of four years. The Advisory Budget Com-
mission decided that critical needs for improvement projects
will require $117 million and that certainly we should do no
less than this.
In facing these critical needs we followed a very sound and
conservative approach in the financing of this program by recom-
mending $47 million in direct appropriations to capital construc-
tion.
This means that we shall not have to ask the people for addi-
tional bonded indebtedness in the next two years.
The other funds needed for this construction program can be
secured from self-liquidating funds, other receipts, and a legis-
lative bond issue. Such a legislative bond issue would be only
two-thirds of the amount by which the state debt was reduced
this biennium.
In considering the "B" Budget requests, major decisions were
made in several areas. I will discuss, first of all, education.
The last General Assembly moved our public school program
forward swiftly, and our state led the country in the rate of im-
provement. That took real political courage because they backed
up their beliefs with the necessary money. The advance was a
major one. The school tax has turned out to be one of the best
investments we have ever made for our boys and girls. It cannot
be repealed unless we want to repeal school improvements. We
don't.
I firmly believe, and there are thousands across this state who
believe with me, that the surest way in which we can give our
people a better life is to prepare our children to compete effec-
tively in the age in which they live. We will make every effort
to give our adults a better opportunity through better training
Messages to the General Assembly
71
and more job opportunities, but the fact remains that our sound-
est investment is in our boys and girls. They still have the time
to learn; their lives are not yet shaped to the patterns which
restrict so many of us who are older. In them lies the hope of
North Carolina.
We are recommending, therefore, that this state invest during
the coming year an additional $51 million in our children. This
program will provide a teacher allotment formula which will
provide the student more attention in the classroom; five days
sick leave for teachers, the first and only sick leave teachers have
had; aid for purchase of high school textbooks, $4.00 per pupil;
salary increases for teachers of 3 per cent in the first year, and
2 per cent in the second year of the biennium, which is not
much, but priorities were given to other things by education
leaders, including teachers themselves; additional equipment for
our industrial education centers; other improvements in our
school bus program, clerical help, and other functions.
In higher education we have many needs. One of the most
pressing is the strengthening of our faculties to a point at which
they can effectively match other institutions of similar status and
character throughout the United States. We recommend that
this can be done at a cost of $7 million.
As was pointed out by the Governor's Commission on Educa-
tion Beyond the High School, we need to convert three of our
community colleges into four-year institutions. To convert insti-
tutions at Charlotte, Wilmington, and Asheville will cost $2
million.
Also, as the commission's report said, we need a system of two-
year comprehensive community colleges to offer both college and
technical-vocational training. These community colleges are to
be developed as part of a large program, and should have local
support and interest. To begin the development of this impor-
tant system, the Board of Education needs $1 million.
We turn now to the area of correction. A significant change
is being recommended by sizable increases in probation and
paroles programs, and a corresponding leveling off of prison ex-
penditures. Substantial savings to the state should be realized
in that it costs approximately twelve times as much to keep a
man in prison as it does to supervise him on probation. There
are also the indirect savings to the Welfare Department by keep-
ing the man on the job as a wage earner.
Further, the educational and rehabilitation services of the
Prison Department have recommended increases. With these
improved services, and the improvements recommended in the
72
Papers of Terry Sanford
paroles and probations programs, we hope to continue North
Carolina's enviable record of a decreasing prison population
while the nation's prison population as a whole is increasing.
For mental institutions, we are recommending appropriations
of $52 million, an increase of $9 million. This provides for the
increase in the number of mentally retarded children coming
under the care of our institutions under the "A" Budget concept,
and for a significant improvement in the "B" Budget in the level
of medical care and treatment service in all of our mental insti-
tutions.
Following approval by the voters for the constitutional amend-
ment authorizing salary increases for the members of the Council
of State, we have recommended that the salaries of these elected
officials be set at $18,000. These loyal public servants have long
been neglected, and I am happy to endorse wholeheartedly re-
muneration for their services which will be in keeping with the
responsibilities they bear.
The "A" Budget also provides $9 million for our long-estab-
lished automatic and merit increment programs for state em-
ployees.
agriculture fund
We are recommending an increase of about $3 million for
continued growth and for a number of programs essential to
help improve our farm economy. I will mention four: first, our
meat and poultry inspection program; second, the Cooperative
Agriculture Extension Service; third, the food and drug control
program; and fourth, the programs of marketing fruit and vege-
tables.
HIGHWAY FUND
The third major fund is the Highway Fund.
While it is still very strong, this fund has not experienced the
exceptional growth of our General Fund revenue.
Highway Fund revenues are derived almost entirely from the
gasoline tax and motor vehicles license fees, supplemented by
federal aid construction funds.
Since much the greater part of the Highway Fund budget is
dedicated to highway construction and maintenance, this fund
cannot be considered in the same way as the General Fund. As
soon as a project is begun, the funds for completing that project
are encumbered, and there are balances, of both state and federal
money, which are carried forward each year for completion of
these projects. These factors prohibit a one-sentence analysis.
Messages to the General Assembly
73
Let me generalize, however, by saying that there are sufficient
revenues in the Highway Fund to continue both the Highway
and the Motor Vehicles departments at generally the same level
at which they now operate.
This is no mean accomplishment, in view of the fact that dur-
ing this biennium we have had the largest secondary road build-
ing program since the Scott farm-to-market roads.
Sufficient money is recommended to match all federal aid
construction funds apportioned for North Carolina. As you know,
our interstate and primary highway system is being developed
as rapidly as possible, and this program will be continued.
It would be misleading, however, for me to indicate that we
are building all the roads we should. There simply isn't enough
money and we have limited our recommendations to money
which is now available in existing funds.
The major change in this area is the recommendation to
eliminate Highway Fund diversions in the form of gasoline
inspection fees not related to the administration of that program,
and the cost of prison labor not actually used by the Highway
Department. By ending these diversions, $12 million is made
available for secondary road construction, or an increase of 29
per cent over that which would have otherwise been available.
Also of special significance is the addition of twenty-five high-
way patrolmen for the strengthening of our traffic safety program.
We may need more. This support, added to our increased
attention to traffic safety engineering in highway construction
and improvements, should help save lives and property of our
people on the highways.
This, then, is our recommended budget for 1963-1965. It is a
substantial budget, in that it totals $1.8 billion when federal
and all other funds are added. However, it should be viewed
in a proper perspective.
It must be remembered that in North Carolina there are no
county roads, no county prisons, and that basic school support
is provided by the state. This state-wide philosophy has made it
possible for us to get more from our tax dollar than any other
state in the union. We move forward with our 7-cent gasoline
tax while other states demand the same 7 cents, or even 8 cents,
in state taxes, and then depend on the counties to provide sub-
stantial road building and maintenance with revenues from local
property taxes.
We must remember that when we compare North Carolina
to all the other states, with all of these factors in mind, we rank
forty-ninth in the nation in the amount which is spent per person
74
Papers of Terry San ford
for governmental services.
When we compare the number of government employees in
the same light, we rank forty-sixth in the nation.
When we compare the amount of debt each citizen must bear
because of these same services, North Carolina ranks forty-sixth.
Even with these comparisons in mind, however, we know that
our state has moved to the forefront in many areas. Today, as
in years past, we are sensitive to the needs of our people in
schools, roads, hospitals, industry, agriculture, and all the facets
of this modern world. Yet these services, at a very high standard,
are within our means.
The growing needs of a growing people demand a forward-
looking budget, a budget that matches the spirit of aggressive
progress of North Carolina.
Progress with fiscal integrity is the tradition of North Carolina,
and this tradition has been our guiding light in preparing and
presenting the budget for 1963-1965.
Messages to the General Assembly
75
SPECIAL MESSAGE ON TRAFFIC SAFETY
April 2, 1963
[Because traffic safety was the subject of much talk and little action,
Governor Sanford made a third personal appearance before the 1963 Gen-
eral Assembly to urge strong legislation in the field. The delivery of this
message dramatized the need and the legislators backed the Governor by
enacting many of the provisions he recommended. Despite the new legis-
lation, traffic accidents and deaths continued to increase, resulting in what
Sanford called his "greatest disappointment as Governor."]
Mr. President, Mr. Speaker, Members of the North Carolina
General Assembly:
I thank you for the advantage of appearing before you, rather
than dispatching a written message, because this subject requires
all the prominence we can gain for it. You and I need the
attention and concern of the public, because in the normal course
of things you are not going to win any popularity contests work-
ing with the problems of highway safety.
The ones who are pinched by traffic laws often complain, and
often bitterly, and the ones whose lives are saved never know it.
Project Impact, an experiment in six counties, saved at least
nineteen lives. Those nineteen people should be up here lobbying
for an extension of that experiment to all of the state, but they
are not, for it is obvious that they cannot be identified because no
one knows where misfortune might have struck had it not been
for this official safety action.
But they are alive, and many others avoided painful or dis-
abling injuries, and many hundreds of others can be saved in the
future if the public will understand and support our efforts.
The problem is that in 1962, in just one calendar year, 1,320
people lost their lives, 37,000 persons were injured, and $200
million were lost on the highways of North Carolina, just one
of fifty states. Think of that: 1,320 dead; 37,000 injured; $200
million lost. Just one year, just one state.
Automobile wrecks are the sixth leading cause of death in the
United States.
Automobile wrecks are the number-one cause of death among
young people from five to twenty-five.
This is an epidemic. You are the doctors.
Your immediate reaction to this staggering description of
destruction might be one of hopelessness. We are tempted to
wring our hands in despair, or to reach out for one simple, single
cure-all.
76
Papers of Terry Sanford
We cannot afford to do eitfier. We know from our own North
Carolina experiences that ^ve can whittle away at the destruction
by the systematic action exerted by public officials.
In 1935 we had 1,095 people killed, and in 1962 we had jumped
up 225 beyond this figure. This is much better than it seems.
In 1935 we had only a half million vehicles traveling only 4
billion miles. The death rate was twenty-six for every 100 million
miles of travel. In 1962, with 2 million cars, the rate of death
was 6.2 per 100 million miles. So you can see that we have been
making progress, for if the 1935 rate had not been reduced, we
would have lost more than 5,000 North Carolinians in 1962.
Last year, for the first time since 1941, the number of Americans
killed in automobile accidents climbed back up to more than
41,000. This shows that for a period of twenty years we were
successful in holding the line. But 1962 showed us that we are
unable to hold the line any longer with the present resources.
Many areas in the country have been able to achieve dramatic
reductions in traffic accidents through the use of what is known
as "the managed approach." This is the approach which has been
re-emphasized in North Carolina in the last several months. First,
to define a total program and to mobilize public participation, we
organized the North Carolina Traffic Safety Council, consisting
of leading citizens, employing a professional staff, paid for from
private nontax funds. Then we called together all state officials
with traffic saftey responsibilities, and constituted them the Gov-
ernor's Coordinating Committee for Traffic Safety (representa-
tives of the General Assembly, Health, Education, Justice, Motor
Vehicles, Insurance, Highways, Institute of Government, and
Safety Council).
I want to assure you that no one feels that the traffic accident
problem will be solved by the simple passing of laws. This is a
job for everybody, and the most important responsibility falls
to the understanding citizen who is willing to support the neces-
sary official action. These two organizations concern themselves
with a number of avenues through which official and unofficial
action must be exerted, including accident records, laws and
ordinances, engineering, education, police traffic supervision,
motor vehicle administration, traffic courts, public information,
and organized citizen support. We are working on all of these.
Today we look to our legislative part in the total effort. I am
suggesting nine points for your consideration. The Coordinating
Committee, using studies of accident records as a foundation, has
agreed on two things: (1) the most important causes of accidents
and (2) the means to control or eliminate these causes.
Messages to the General Assembly
77
Therefore, the suggestions I am about to make are neither the
result of one man's investigation nor are they any so-called
pet projects of individual state agencies. Rather they are the
result of agreement by public officials in every place of accident
preventive work, and are related directly to the accidents now
occurring on highways in our own state of North Carolina.
COORDINATING COMMITTEE
We need to provide for the continuing co-ordination of official
traffic safety effort, and North Carolina's official agencies with
traffic safety responsibilities should be bound together by statutory
authority. This has worked well, but the united effort should
not be dependent on the mere invitation of the Chief Executive,
but should be given the status of being a creation of the General
Assembly. This would require no money. The role of such a
Coordinating Committee on Traffic Safety, similar to the one
already existing by invitation of the Governor, would be to
examine continually the accident problems of North Carolina,
to determine the needs of the represented agencies in dealing with
these problems, to determine the priorities to be given these
needs, and to provide for continuing co-ordination of the state's
accident preventive efforts. In this way we would have a single
group charged with the leadership in reducing highway wrecks.
This committee should include in its membership representatives
of the General Assembly, perhaps the chairman of each committee
on highway safety, thus obtaining spokesmen for the legislative
bodies.
COURTS
Implementation of the court improvement amendments will
contribute much to traffic accident prevention, and I hope you
will do all that you can to assure the orderly adoption of a
uniform court system in the state. I realize that we cannot move
too hastily in arranging these complex provisions which must be
designed to serve for perhaps a hundred years, but I do hope you
will at least adopt the recommendations of the North Carolina
Bar Association.
INTERSTATE COMPACTS
In accordance with legislation recommended by your Com-
mission on Interstate Cooperation, I urge the adoption of inter-
state compacts dealing with drivers licenses and motor vehicle
safety equipment. These two compacts will help protect our
citizens from unsafe drivers who accumulate records of accidents
and violations in a number of states and will help assure the
78
Papers of Terry Sanford
prompt adoption of uniform standards for new motor vehicle
safety equipment.
THE POINT SYSTEM
The point system has worked well, but there are certain loop-
holes which should be closed. The systems should reflect the
factual realities of a driver's conduct as decided by a court, and
not courtroom technicalities which allow evasion of the point
system.
ADDITIONAL PATROLMEN
We know additional patrolmen will reduce accidents. Elimi-
nation of paper work with insurance reports, if you see fit to enact
this, will free many, but we probably could make out a case for
needing several hundred more patrolmen. We cannot afford this
many, but we should add as many as possible during the next
biennium.
SEAT BELTS
Experts call the seat belt the most important safety device that
can be added to a motor vehicle. One thing we know positively
is that seat belts save lives, and that their use reduces greatly
the chance of getting killed if you are involved in an accident.
We are not suggesting that we require them on all cars but we do
recommend them for all cars. We are asking simply that they
be required on new cars in the future, just as safety glass is
required. I hope you will pass the bill now pending.
~ BEGINNING DRIVERS
I don't believe in blaming teen-agers for all of our problems.
There is too much of that. Neither do I believe in putting them
in any dangerous situation without adequate training and advice,
and that is exactly what we have been doing.
Our accident records show that drivers under the age of twenty
have more than twice their share of accidents occurring in the
driving population. This is pretty good evidence we have been
placing them in a dangerous and deadly situation without proper
care.
I believe most parents and most young people believe we can
attack this problem without penalizing young people.
Perhaps our best approach would be to require driver education
in the school system or in the Motor Vehicles Department driver-
training program, for all new drivers under the age of eighteen.
We could waive or relax their requirement in the few places
Messages to the General Assembly
79
where such training is not available. We would be saving young
lives if we also added a requirement for the issuance of a pro-
visional license for all drivers under the age of twenty. We should
also make training available before the sixteenth birthday.
We are not meeting our duty as parents unless we do provide
some safeguards, and ultimately our best hope for a lasting
solution of the traffic-accident problem is driver education.
TESTS FOR ALCOHOL
This always runs into opposition, but how can we turn away
from the clear proof that one-third of all of North Carolina's
fatal accidents involve a drinking driver? The nondrinking driver
is entitled to what protection we can give him, and we are not
giving him very much.
We need a chemical test law requiring persons accused of
driving under the influence to take a scientific test to determine
how much they have been drinking. We should make it simple—
perhaps the breath test. I believe this would be a strong deterrent.
First, we could take one of two approaches. We could require
this as additional proof under the existing laws and drivers'
license penalties.
As an alternative, we could make it simply against the law to
be a drinking driver by specifying that driving with a specified
percentage content of alcohol is against the law, coupled with a
provision that the commissioner could revoke the license for not
more than one year in place of the present mandatory revocation
for one full year as the penalty for driving under the influence
of alcohol. This latter course would be preferable because it would
eliminate the doubtful situation of attempting to define "under
the influence" and would give the commissioner discretion in
individual cases.
CHECK OF SAFETY EQUIPMENT
I am opposed to the mechanical inspection we found so burden-
some, but I am far more opposed to neglecting to check the
safety equipment which we require on automobiles for the pur-
pose of saving lives. I think a periodic check of the five or six
items on a motor vehicle relating to our safety— brakes, horn,
tires, steering, lights, windshield wipers— at any garage or service
station which cares to qualify for approval, would reduce sub-
stantially our deaths. Not only would a safety-check program
require safe equipment, but it would create an increased aware-
ness of safety on the part of every individual driver. Records in
other states, as well as our own records, demonstrate a safety check
would reduce materially highway accidents.
80
Papers of Terry Sanford
Those are the items. I leave the details to you. These are simple
things, and yet they are substantial things. These do not increase
the encroachment upon individual liberties. Rather they enhance
individual liberty, and improve the chance we all seek to lead a
healthy and productive life.
We look to you for the leadership which will call to a halt the
increasing epidemic of traffic deaths and injuries.
Messages to the General Assembly
81
MESSAGE TO GENERAL ASSEMBLY
AT ITS CULLOWHEE SESSION
May 14, 1963
[The General Assembly made several junkets throughout the state during
the Sanford administration. Proponents of these trips maintained that the
legislators were able to see and hear firsthand various local problems; oppo-
nents insisted that the trips were so tightly scheduled that such a purpose
could not be fully realized. After an overnight railroad trip from Raleigh,
the legislators went to Western Carolina College where they, about 2,000
college students, and citizens of the area heard the Governor urge co-opera-
tion between the sections of North Carolina rather than a continuation of
a feeling of sectionalism.]
Mr. President, Mr. Speaker, members of the General Assembly,
citizens of western North Carolina, and students from all across
North Carolina and, indeed, the nation:
This is a day when Americans were scheduled to reach upward
toward the stars and I think it was very appropriate that our
legislative branch and officials of North Carolina should today
come up to this "Land of the Sky."
There was, as a great many of you will remember, a time when
it took all day and most of the night to get from Raleigh here.
In those days you had to point your T-Model somewhere in the
general direction of the West and go through South Carolina
and Georgia in order to get to Cullowhee.
There was a time, and I put emphasis on there was a time,
when this area was closer to the capitals of South Carolina,
Georgia, and Tennessee than to Raleigh. But today you can fly
from here to Raleigh in an hour, or you can drive it in six hours
and not violate the safety program. Or, as our legislators can tell
you, you can take a nice leisurely overnight train trip, doing your
work and getting a good night's rest on the way up here.
And thanks to the rapid advances in communications, you can,
in a matter of seconds, communicate from here to Raleigh— as
the people in the Budget Bureau and the Highway Building
know.
Today as you know. Cooper [Astronaut Gordon Cooper] and
the officials of NASA are still reaching for the stars. And the
General Assembly too is still reaching for the accomplishments
which will help develop North Carolina's great potential. As we
reach, I think it is well to remind ourselves that the problems
and the opportunities which face one part of North Carolina are
the problems and the opportunities of all of North Carolina.
82
Papers of Terry Sanford
I hold a strong conviction that the problems and the op-
portunities which face the tourist industry in these western
counties should be the concern of eastern and Piedmont counties.
The harvests and the failures of the cabbage and corn crops are
of considerable importance to you here, of course, and also to the
textile workers of Kannapolis and Concord, Greensboro and
Burlington.
The number of tourists who drive the Blue Ridge Parkway,
across the roof of North Carolina, has a strong correlation to the
number who drive down the new History Highway on the
Atlantic coast.
The food processing plants up here have given farmers and
businessmen of eastern North Carolina some good pointers.
On the other side of the coin, you who live and work in this
area are adversely affected when the waves of the ocean erode the
Outer Banks. It takes a little longer for you to feel those waves,
and that loss, but you will feel them.
When the looms are stopped in the Piedmont because of im-
proper foreign competition, when cancer scares threaten the
tobacco plants of the farms of Pitt and Lenoir and the factories
of Forsyth and Durham and Rockingham, the economy of these
western counties suffers. And, indeed, as we look now to your
problems and your opportunities, I am convinced absolutely that
the problems of the Appalachian are the problems of the state
of North Carolina and we take them seriously.
In short, the town of Jackson down east and the county of
Jackson up here rise or fall together; Nags Head and Nantahala
are in the tourist business together; the distance between Manteo
and Murphy is an ever narrowing one.
I would say to the citizens of this section that your represent-
atives and your senators are well aware of this unity of purpose
and unity of opportunity. I could call their names one by one,
and say that they understand and that they are representing all
of North Carolina and that their work and their contributions
indicate that they understand that all of North Carolina will
stand or fall as we stand together.
There is no longer any place for sectionalism. There is no
longer one part playing the state off against the other. Indeed,
if we are going to reach our opportunities as we can, we need to
do it working together.
These members of the General Assembly— I say to you who
live here and to you students— are people who are dedicated and
who are working diligently every day and almost every night to
develop North Carolina's future, to give everybody a better
Messages to the General Assembly
83
opportunity to earn a better living and to have a better life, to
give young people a chance to have the kind of education which
will enable them to compete with young people from any part
of the nation and any part of the world. These are the people
who have laid those plans, these are the people who are fulfilling
those programs.
These are the men who are accelerating the drive for new and
diversified industry to improve the economy of our state.
These are the men who are considering ways to improve and
enhance the third largest income-producing industry in our
state: the tourist industry.
These are the men who made possible more secondary road
funds during the last two years than in any two years since
Governor Scott's road bond program. In the counties that com-
pose the group we usually consider western North Carolina, you
may be interested in knowing that more than $8 million was
spent in the last two years on secondary roads alone. Translated
into mileage, that means 245 miles of paving and 535 miles of
improvement, and we are just beginning to demonstrate by
stopping diversion, and by more careful economy that we can
continue to speed up road-building progress. We are going to
do all we can to help you through road construction to open up
this country and improve the economy.
Most important, these are the people helping in education, the
ultimate denominator of all of North Carolina. These are the
men who lifted high in 1961, and who are lifting still higher in
1963, the educational opportunities of all the boys and all the
girls in all the counties of North Carolina.
It is right that today's joint session of the General Assembly
should be held on a college campus. It is just about ninety-six
hours since the lawmakers of North Carolina endowed every
student in North Carolina.
The members of the 1963 General Assembly made that per-
manent endowment through adoption of the broadest based and
the most far-reaching legislative act in all of the United States.
Benefits of this measure, which was adopted with overwhelming
approval on Friday, will be appreciated by many generations of
North Carolinans, and I believe the historians of this state will
place the accomplishments of this General Assembly along with
the provision of the Revolutionary Constitution of North Caro-
lina providing for the University of North Carolina and later
the establishment of colleges like Western Carolina and Appala-
chian.
This act is but part of North Carolina's twentieth century
84
Papers of Terry Sanford
commitment to give its children the best possible opportunity to
get ready for the competition o£ life.
Other measures reaffirming that commitment are now under
careful consideration by the members of the General Assembly.
The representatives and senators are now considering a sub-
stantial increase in the public schools and our continuing drive
to make our schools second to none.
For the first time in the history of our state, the entire budget
requested by the State Board of Education, which carefully
screened all of the needs, has been approved by the administration
and the Advisory Budget Commission. The chairman of the Board
of Education was able to come to the Committee on Appropria-
tions and say: "We have nothing new to request because for the
first time in all of the history of this state, education has been
put absolutely in the first place."
There are increased funds in the budget for Western Carolina
and for the other senior colleges.
And we know of the influence of this college, Appalachian, and
Asheville-Biltmore on western North Carolina; and we look to
these institutions to provide the leadership to continue the pro-
gress to make North Carolina what it must be.
There is continued support in the budget for industrial educa-
tion centers, which are meaning so much to so many, many stu-
dents who for various reasons are not going on to college. You
also will find appropriations to establish a strong basis for in-
dustrial education at the high school level. This is something
about which we have concerned ourselves. Perhaps in paying
attention to many other problems in the past we have not given
adequate attention. I am satisfied that this General Assembly will
write a new record and a new start for broader industrial and
vocational opportunities for high school students.
There are funds for the mentally gifted children challenging
them to do their utmost to make all the contributions that they
can make to this state, because of their unusual abilities. And,
incidentally, this program got its start right here on the campus
of Western Carolina College.
There are steps under way to broaden the chances in life for
the mentally retarded children. This legislature is going to show
that we have come to the place where we are going to remember
these long forgotten children.
These are but a few items of North Carolina's number-one
purpose of education.
There are many other challenges and many other opportunities
and many other things which the General Assembly will do to
speed the progress of our state.
Messages to the General Assembly
85
There is the proposed space center.
There is the important matter of democratic redistricting.
There is the vital question of traffic safety legislation.
There is the need for improving our mental health and
hospital system.
There are the questions of parks, community planning, forests,
recreation, wildlife, and water resources— altogether 1,500 to 2,000
questions contained in bills introduced in this session to which
attention is given every day by these distinguished legislative
bodies.
This General Assembly is working for you. This General
Assembly is working for all of the people of North Carolina.
And I am satisfied that when the record is written, that this
General Assembly will stand at the very top in contributions
made to all of the people of North Carolina.
And I am very happy to have been associated with it.
Thank you very much.
86
Papers of Terry Sanford
ADDRESS TO THE SPECIAL SESSION
OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY
October 14, 1963
[The North Carolina Senate had not been redistricted since 1941 despite
the constitutional requirement that such be done after every federal ten-year
census. By 1963 changing regional patterns and political and judicial pres-
sures joined to accentuate the need for redistricting legislation; the result was
a General Assembly which struggled with the problem but failed to find a
solution. On June 26 Governor Sanford said that a special session would be
necessary and that he would appoint a special committee to study the prob-
lem and recommend legislation. In speaking to the legislators meeting in
October, Governor Sanford urged the passage of the law "with dispatch," and
the members of the two houses took him literally, passing the redistricting
bill four days after their arrival in Raleigh.]
As you return to a special session, I have the opportunity to
express to you as a group my gratitude for your help to me and
for your contributions to the forward progress of North Carolina
during the regular 1963 session. There has seldom been a session
of the General Assembly which provided so well for education,
and never a session which provided so well for higher education,
with new funds for faculties, with support for new and improved
programs in an age of increasing complexities, and with a blue-
print for the future of our university and colleges which for-
ever will mark an upward turning point in the history of North
Carolina.
There were many other accomplishments, for those in need
of mental health treatment, and especially a comprehensive pro-
gram of hope for our long forgotten children, the retarded. Be-
cause of your work and devotion there is a new vitality about
our state, and many generations will profit from your good works.
We did not do everything that we might have done, but it is
a mighty record of solid achievement. I am proud of your record.
I hope all North Carolinians will understand these accomplish-
ments.
We did leave undone the little matter of redistricting the Sen-
ate.
Things became so harried and hurried and confused in the
closing weeks, with so many important programs and policies
being developed, that we just could not adequately wrap up
this one responsibility.
I well understand, and I believe those who have been close
to the scene well understand, that the majority has always in-
tended to meet this responsibility. That you did is best expressed
by your resolution, passed in the waning hours of the regular
Messages to the General Assembly
87
session, requesting the Governor to call a special session because
the General Assembly, in your phrase, had "been unable to agree
on the provisions of an Act to redistrict the State Senate, as re-
quired by the Constitution of North Carolina."
I have complied with that request, and I have welcomed the
chance over the summer, with calmness and care, to work with
most of you in preparing for the final action we have come to
take.
The constitutional duty of the governor is to state the purpose
of this special session and to recommend the action which he
believes should be taken.
That is a very easy duty. I will report to you what you already
know, and recommend an action which I am sure you already
are prepared to take. My report and recommendation are best
wrapped up in the words of your resolution which I have already
quoted, "to redistrict the State Senate, as required by the Con-
stitution of North Carolina."
You and I, in preparing for this session, have indeed been
guided by the constitutional mandate that "each Senate District
shall contain, as near as may be, an equal number of inhabitants."
During these several months I have met both formally and in-
formally with many of you. We have discussed, considered, ad-
justed, and agreed in order to get the job done.
Our plan, the consensus bill I call it because so many had a
hand in its formulation, cannot be completely pleasing to every-
one. It is the result of conscientious resolve to follow the Consti-
tution regardless of all other considerations, political, personal,
regional. Some of you doubtless cannot return because of the
new plan, but this has not caused you to shirk your duty.
The districts have not been redrawn for more than twenty
years, and this same period has seen the greatest changes in our
population. These facts have forced us to present a bill which
makes substantial changes in our senatorial district boundaries.
The result has been that almost every district has been redrawn.
In spite of this degree of adjustment required, our legislators
have co-operated in the true spirit of North Carolina, and we
are able to present a bill which has the majority support in both
houses of the General Assembly.
I do not know whether there can be a constitutional amend-
ment which will satisfy the necessary three-fifths majority. A
number of proposals were discussed during the regular session.
In the course of working out the redistricting bill submitted to-
day, a questionnaire was sent to each legislator. From this it
became apparent that there was much sentiment for constitu-
88
Papers of Terry Sanford
tional change, but wide variation as to what the change should
be.
I think some constitutional amendment is justified. We could
use some guidelines for setting up districts better than the pres-
ent terse, "as near as may be" equal in population. Also, I think
it would be to our benefit to have some provision for "auto-
matic" redistricting in the future. This could mean a commis-
sion authorized to draw the lines, to present it to the General
Assembly, to become final after ninety days, for example, if not
amended by the General Assembly. Or we could provide that a
commission would take over if the first session after the official
census failed to redistrict. Both of these proposals would leave
the duty with the legislature but would eliminate many head-
aches for future legislators and governors.
As to other forms, I have no recommendations at this time.
Whatever you do about amending the Constitution, we can-
not let our desire to improve it prevent us from following our
clear and present duty under the present Constitution.
A bill to do this, "to redistrict the State Senate, as required by
the Constitution of North Carolina," has been signed by a ma-
jority in each of the houses.
I trust you will pass it into law with dispatch.
PUBLIC ADDRESSES AND
SUMMARIES OF
PUBLIC ADDRESSES
PUBLIC ADDRESSES AND SUMMARIES OF
PUBLIC ADDRESSES
[During his term of office, Governor Sanford made 369 speeches, of which
more or less complete copies were preserved. In addition, he made approxi-
mately 425 others from rough notes or extemporaneously. Addresses selected
to be included in full in this volume were chosen because of their impor-
tance, their relevance to the over-all Sanford program, and the diversity of
their subject matter. Summaries of 165 other addresses are printed in this
section; the remainder are listed by date, title, and place of delivery and
may be found on pages 491-521.]
A STATEMENT OF FAITH
AND PURPOSE IN EDUCATION
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
November 21, 1960
[Prior to assuming the office of Governor, Terry Sanford outlined in clear
and unmistakable terms his belief in the necessity of quality education for
North Carolina. In "A Statement of Faith and Purpose in Education,"
Sanford called education "the foundation of economic improvement," "the
foundation of democracy," "the foundation of the needs and hopes of the
nation," "survival," and "life and growth and happiness." In this address
he made clear his intentions of putting education first during the four-year
term of his administration and of embarking on a ten-year plan for making
the dream of quality education become a reality in his state. Because of its
significance, the address is included here despite the fact that it was delivered
before Sanford's term of office began.]
On many occasions and in many ways I have tried to empha-
size during the past weeks and months my conviction that North
Carolina is facing a new day. All around us I see the evidence
of a brightening dawn of opportunity, unmatched in its poten-
tial by anything in our past.
A new day brings new opportunities. It also brings new re-
sponsibilities. The dawn cries to a people to awake. Now is the
time to get up and go to work. North Carolina faces an exciting
future, and we must be up and doing.
North Carolinians have always understood that education is
the means by which our state must reach its full potential growth
in both economic and human values. At the turn of the century,
Walter Hines Page made the following statement of faith and
it's good today:
I believe in the free public training of both the hands and the mind of
every child born of woman.
I believe that by the right training of men we add to the wealth of the
world. All wealth is the creation of man, and he creates it only in proportion
92
Papers of Terry Sanford
to the trained uses of the community; and, the more men we train, the
more wealth everyone may create.
I believe in the perpetual regeneration of society, in the immortality of
democracy, and in growth everlasting.''®
This brave and penetrating grasp of the importance of educa-
tion in the life of the state was supported in the political arena
by Page's able contemporary, Charles Brantley Aycock, who has
come to be known as "educational governor." In terms of politi-
cal action, he issued this clarion call that we know still today:
"Equal! That is the word! On that word I plant myself and my
party— the equal right of every child born on earth to burgeon
out all that there is within him."
The people of North Carolina were not deaf and they did not
turn away. Many other leaders arose. The people responded.
North Carolina was poor, extremely poor, just struggling up out
of the period of Reconstruction; but gradually schools were
built, the school term was lengthened, and people in other states
began to be aware that this "valley of humiliation between two
mountains of conceit" was taking the lead among all the other
states who started at the bottom of the ladder along with us
after the period of Reconstruction collapse.
But what was good enough for yesterday will be totally inade-
quate tomorrow. Whatever our success, it is not enough for the
rapidly advancing scientific, changing world we now enter.
We are justly proud of North Carolina's position. We came
up the hard way. We have come a long route. We have no
apologies, but too many of us have become somewhat self-satisfied
and complacent about our reputation as "first in the South," and
too many have thought the job was finished.
The job is not finished. What we have really done is to create
new and unlimited opportunities.
Dr. Howard Odum^^ of the University of North Carolina
showed clearly that North Carolina did not need to stay in the
group of states called the "nation's economic problem number
one." While we do not have everything, he pointed out, we do
have in abundance those resources that really matter— soil, water,
climate, rainfall, and people— most of all we have a stock of sturdy
^« Walter Hines Page, The Rebuilding of Old Commonwealths (New York: Dou-
bleday, Page and Company, 1905), 102, hereinafter cited as Page, Rebuilding of
Old Commonwealths.
" Howard Washington Odum (1884-1954) , author, teacher, sociologist; Kenan
Professor of Sociology at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1920-
1954; recipient of O. Max Gardner award, 1953; contributor to improved race
relations in the South. Stanley J. Kunitz, Twentieth Century Authors: A Bio-
graphical Dictionary of Modern Literature (New York: H. W. Wilson Company
[First Supplement], 1955), 733.
Public Addresses and Summaries
93
and able people. We only need to develop fully this human re-
source.
I am not satisfied with being first in the South. I want the
title "first in the country." Why shouldn't North Carolina strive
to lead the nation?
To that goal I dedicate the full measure of my devotion. I
believe that a fearful, hesitant approach to the future will, in-
deed, cause us to "lose our ventures." I believe, like Page, in
universal education, in the eternal values of democracy, and in
growth everlasting. I pledge myself and my party, like Aycock,
to achieving for each child the opportunity "to burgeon out all
that there is within him," regardless of where he lives or who
his parents are.
Quality education is no mean goal! For all other goals we seek
for North Carolina can be measured by the quality, the scope,
the reach of our educational efforts.
Education is the foundation of economic improvement. I am
concerned, vitally, and will be throughout this administration,
with industrial development, farm income, the economic growth,
and the chance of all to make a better living. Because I am con-
cerned I have chosen quality education as the rock on which to
build the house of my administration.
Education is the foundation of democracy. I am concerned
with defending the principles of freedom, of individual liberties,
of free enterprise, of equality and dignity of man, and therefore
I seek the fulfillment of these principles through quality educa-
tion we offer our boys and girls.
Education is the foundation of the needs and hopes of the
nation. I am concerned with our part in the world, and I am con-
cerned with the peace of the world, and therefore I propose that
we adequately educate the scientists, the statesmen, and the citi-
zenry who will fully understand and are equipped to defend and
promote the ideals of our dynamic democracy of the twentieth
century.
Education, put in the bleakest terms, is survival. Here in our
own small part of the free world, we can do no less than seek
the best as we prepare to do our part to defend America and the
free world.
And education, put in its brightest terms, is life and growth,
and happiness. We are not here merely to make a living. We are
talking about the fundamental when we talk about education,
and our goal is worthy of the best we have in mind, and heart,
and spirit.
As Governor of North Carolina, I will work for a program
94
Papers of Terry Sanford
which provides educational opportunity, appropriate and avail-
able, second to none in quality, for all the children of our state,
and I will work to obtain adequate support for that program.
The program is up to the State Board of Education, the De-
partment of Public Instruction, the local school boards, the su-
perintendents, the principals, the teachers, and the parents.
The support is up to the General Assembly, the county and
city officials, or, in other words, put in its broadest sense, to the
entire citizenry of North Carolina.
I know we have an excellent blueprint for the program, and
I know we have the people who have the ability to put it into
effect. I am also confident that the people of North Carolina, be-
lieving that we can build a better state through quality educa-
tion, will provide the support for this program.
We cannot know for several months exactly how much money
we will have available in the budget to be adopted next spring,
although I do know that happily the revenue picture is extremely
bright. I do know that the members of the Advisory Budget
Commission are conscientious, dedicated, and share with me a
faith in public education.
But I go back to my original statement, made February 23 in
Greensboro, in the middle of a political campaign, when I out-
lined our school needs and our state's potential, and called on
the women of the state to lead a "crusade for education." I said
then, and on numerous occasions since then, that I value chil-
dren more than money, and my position remains as I stated
then:
I believe the people are eager to pay for quality education. They know
this is the only basis for improvement. They know good men and women
leave the teaching profession every month because they have to support
families. They know that a disproportionately high percentage of college
graduates, educated to a large degree by public expense, leave this state to
teach elsewhere because of our inadequate salaries. They know that ultimate
salaries are extremely inadequate for career people. They know that to
attract enough of the right quality teachers we cannot rely upon love of
teaching, alone, but must offer salaries commensurate with their training and
education.
I said then and I repeat now, / would not be honest if I did
not promise that, if revenues are inadequate, I will have the
courage to recommend to the General Assembly and the people
the proper sources.
I will also recommend to the General Assembly where we can
get the money. That was my campaign promise, and it is my
pledge to North Carolina tonight. The plan is worth the money.
We must do no less. This is the way everyone can share in build-
ing a better state through quality education.
Public Addresses and Summaries 95
The North Carolina plan might be called a "four-star pro-
gram," and I will outline the basic elements of these four guiding
stars, by pointing out that we seek for our state public education
which is (1) appropriate, (2) available, (3) excellent, and (4)
supported.
First, the educational opportunities must be appropriate.
1. This means we seek education which meets state and na-
tional needs, along with and as a part of the needs of the
individual.
It recognizes that individual talents vary, that a total school
program must fit the needs of each child, and that individuality
must not be crushed in a common mold. To achieve this, we
need an adequate counseling and guidance service for our stu-
dents.
It recognizes that all students need a basic education in Eng-
lish, mathematics, the humanities, elementary sciences, the social
sciences, if we are to develop fully for intelligent citizenship.
It recognizes that education in depth in these basic subjects,
plus other disciplines such as foreign languages, should be pro-
vided for those students with greater academic abilities.
It recognizes that the school has some responsibility for a pro-
gram of physical education and health.
It recognizes that vocational courses should be provided, in
addition to the basic academic courses, for those who will seek
employment or technical training after graduation. It should
provide opportunities for education in the practical arts.
It recognizes that we must provide special challenges for the
gifted child.
It recognizes that training must be provided for the handi-
capped child.
It means our human resources, whatever they are, must be
developed fully up and down the line.
2. Having outlined the objectives for educational opportuni-
ties which will be appropriate, how can we go about achieving
such a program? Aware that much has been done, we can do
more in the following ways:
The courses of study to make and keep education appropriate,
in line with the principles outlined, will be left to local school
administrators and teachers with encouragement and assistance
from local school boards, with advice and leadership from the
State Board of Education and State Department of Public In-
struction, and guidance from the Curriculum Study. The Cur-
riculum Study is the most important single effort now being
made to improve the quality of the schools, and we will urge the
96
Papers of Terry Sanford
General Assembly to increase financial support of the study for
the next two years.
We will present a specific program to the General Assembly
to achieve an advance in providing teachers and training for
retarded children.
We will present a specific recommendation to the General
Assembly to begin a program of special school opportunities
for gifted children.
Second, while making education appropriate for individual
development and for the state and national need, we must be
certain that this kind of education is available to all boys and
girls of North Carolina, no matter where they might live.
1. This means that we must continue to recognize that,
largely because of widely diverse circumstances in county wealth.
North Carolina, unlike many states, has assumed primary finan-
cial responsibility for the operation of its schools.
I reaffirm that we will not shift this primary responsibility
back to the counties, and we will not sit idly by awaiting federal
assumption of this responsibility.
2. The state (Board of Education, Department of Public In-
struction, General Assembly, Governor) should encourage con-
solidation wherever and however possible. Better transportation
and Kerr Scott's roads have expanded the reach of every school
building and have altered our thinking of the proper size of a
school community. I accept Dr. James Bryant Conant's standard
that a high school with a graduating class of less than 100 is too
small to be either appropriate in scope or adequate in quality.
Community pride is an admirable trait, but it should not get in
the way of quality education for the children of the community.
We are moving in the right direction across North Carolina, and
local school boards should give careful attention to consolida-
tion, where possible, to achieve quality and an adequate range
of courses of instruction.
3. This means we must make educational opportunity avail-
able for those students who are so handicapped mentally or
physically that they cannot profitably attend a regular school.
Much is now being done in institutional care and in special day
classes, and continued expansion of this training will be made
so that the "forgotten children" will be reached with special
training.
4. Transportation of students must be safe and adequate.
Local school boards need pay special attention to the situation
where school buses serve separate elementary and high schools,
necessitating long delays in the return home of the smaller chil-
Public Addresses and Summaries
97
dren. Part of the answer to this is adequate consolidation, and
part of the answer may be in state aid for the financially-strapped
counties.
5. Availability includes the question of adequate school build-
ings. I believe that this should remain essentially a county re-
sponsibility, that we should be certain that we get the most for
our building dollar (the buildings should be standardized to a
reasonable degree and a limit should be placed on the amount
which can be spent per square foot) , and that the state will
have to provide some matching funds for the next immediate
period which will see an unusual influx of students. So I will
propose to the General Assembly a state school bond issue for
this purpose.
6. If appropriate education is to be available to a degree that
our full potential of human resource is developed, then we need
to expand community colleges and industrial education centers,
and I shall have more to say about these items at a later date.
We must also be concerned with the quality of higher educa-
tion, and I shall discuss this in detail at a later date. I want it
understood clearly that I am in no way discounting the respon-
sibility for doing more— and doing more now— for higher edu-
cation.
Third, the educational opportunities must be excellent, must
be of the highest quality, must be second to none.
To achieve quality, to achieve excellence, will require the
best efforts of all who are concerned with public education.
There is no easy road; there is no clearly-marked road; there
is no sure road; but I do have some landmarks which will lead
us onward.
1. We need to attract able people to the teaching profession
and keep them there once they have become good teachers. We
need to make salaries for teachers competitive. Over the next
ten years we must increase salaries until we can draw and keep
an adequate number of quality teachers. I will recommend to
the General Assembly in 1961 substantial salary increases, but
this is only the first step. We will need to go on and on until
we are not losing teachers, or failing to attract young people to
the teaching profession, because of inadequate salaries. It is that
simple. If we are going to get and keep an adequate number
of the kind of teachers we must have, we must compete for
them in salary scales. We can do no less. This is fundamental.
2. Excellent teachers must have excellent education for their
profession. This education and the institutions in which it is
provided must be strengthened. Scholarships for prospective
98
Papers of Terry Sanford
teachers have been proved worthwhile. The number must be
increased and extended to teachers and administrators in service.
3. The professional help the teacher needs must be provided.
This applies to supervision, special teachers, and to in-service
education opportunities. I will recommend to the General As-
sembly an appropriation to start a program of in-service train-
ing. This is the best way to improve the quality of classroom
teaching.
4. The classroom teaching-learning situation must be im-
proved. This is essential if excellence is to be achieved. The
teacher must be given time to teach. This means that interrup-
tions and nonteaching duties must be reduced to a minimum.
The pupil must be given time to learn. This means that con-
flicting demands on student time and effort must be eliminated.
Class size must be adjusted. In the primary grades, no teacher
should have more than t^venty-five students. In the upper grades,
some classes might include a larger number of students, but all
students should also meet sometime during the day in very
small groups. Some individual attention is essential. A minimum
of fifty professional people for each 1,000 students should be our
goal. I will recommend to the General Assembly a first step in
this direction.
The special services and teaching tools such as textbooks,
laboratories, shops, television, and electronic aids must be ade-
quate. Libraries, the center of the school's instructional pro-
gram, have been neglected in too many schools, and this requires
our immediate action. I will make recommendations for addi-
tional appropriations to the General Assembly concerning these
needs.
Supporting services by noninstructional personnel are part of
the total school effort, and these employees are entitled to fair
treatment and proper consideration and are not going to be
neglected.
5. The student must be given the help he needs to choose
and to follow successfully the right courses. Our goal is that all
of the necessary guidance services needed must be provided. I
will recommend to the General Assembly that we strengthen
guidance services for students.
6. Educational opportunity that is excellent must have excel-
lent leadership. This is true on the state level and on the local
level. Salaries and standards of State Department professional
positions must be established comparable to those of college
professors. Salaries and standards of local educational leadership
positions must be made competitive with leadership positions
in other professions.
Public Addresses and Summaries
99
7. Constant study of school performance is some assurance of
achieving quality and excellence. We need continuing study
and research into methods, courses, techniques, and teacher
education, if we are to achieve constant improvement. Every
business knows the value of research. Witness the Research Tri-
angle. The State Board of Education has already started this
job of research and study in education, and I will recommend
making it a permanent part of the public school structure. In
other words, we will keep on asking ourselves, "How good a job
are we doing? How can we improve what we are doing?"
Fourth, and the last guiding star, we need to support our
schools, and this means everybody must support them. We need
to support them with money, understanding, encouragement,
with determination that we are entitled to the best, and that
we have the capacity and the resources to obtain the best.
This is not so nebulous. Let me point out a few of many
ways we can give such far-ranging support.
1. The taxpayers have been getting their money's worth in
North Carolina. The trouble is that we haven't been buying
enough. I am certain that North Carolina gets more for its
school dollar than, for example. New York or California, where
much more per student is spent. But we are not doing the job
because we are not spending enough. While it is almost mean-
ingless to compare figures with national averages, this never-
theless furnishes some guide to our thinking. The national
average spent on a student is |369. It is the average of wealthy
states and poor states; it is not the top amount. North Carolina,
state and local, spends $230. That doesn't look right, and it
isn't. We can't spend what we ought to next year, no matter
how much we might try, but we can start out now on a deter-
mined goal to increase this amount from year to year. If we had
unlimited funds, we would not want to spend them next year.
The job cannot be done in a year or two, but we can, during
the next ten years, increase our appropriations year after year
until we reach, not necessarily the national average, but the
point where we are achieving the excellence we seek.
2. We must make the teaching profession a truly attractive
one. "Attractive" is probably a poor word because it may sug-
gest relaxed ease and comfortable security and no more. But I
mean "attractive" in the sense that it is of critical importance
to the scholarly mind. This includes an atmosphere of respect
as well as circumstances of comfortable security.
We must provide an atmosphere which will show always its
respect and concern for the teaching profession. It is not enough
100
Papers of Terry Sanford
for this respect to be shown in the isolated act of belated public
recognition for a long career of devoted teaching service come
to an end. It must be a continued concern throughout that
career that the teacher have not only a salary commensurate
with the public service performed, but those added essentials
to a feeling of dignity which all of us, even teachers, must have
in order to give sustained performance.
For example, should a public school teacher, on the theory
that she has three summer months in which to have all her ill-
nesses, not be allowed a single day of sick leave without paying
her own substitute? I think this is unrealistic, as well as unfair,
and not in keeping with the spirit of a state which seeks the
best possible teachers.
3. Recognition of teacher quality is essential. To quote a reso-
lution of the National Education Association, "It is a major
responsibility of the teaching profession, as of other professions,
to evaluate the quality of its services. To enable educators to
meet this responsibility more effectively, the association calls for
continued research to discover means of objective evaluation of
the performance of all professional personnel and their inter-
relationships for the purpose of improving instruction."
I agree with this statement and think this should be the ap-
proach in North Carolina, where, as a matter of fact, such study
and research is presently being carried on.
This is not the so-called subjective merit rating which has
been found unworkable in other states.
I would hope that this study could point the way for a lively
program of encouraging private endowments to reward excep-
tional teaching, similar to the plan of Kenan Professors at Chapel
Hill.
4. It means that parents must understand and support and
believe in the kind of school system we hope will be developed
in North Carolina. It means they must stand behind the school
board in difficult decisions of consolidation and school locations.
It means they must support the school administrators who have
the courage to curtail midweek extracurricular activities. It
means they must insist on homework being assigned and insist
on homework being done.
5. It means that students in school must accept the responsi-
bility of learning. I have difficulty in getting this point across
to two at home, and I have no illusions about getting it across
to the more than a million in the school system; but it is a
challenging job for teachers properly to challenge all children
to do their best. Schooling is not a mother-bird activity. The
Public Addresses and Summaries
101
students must feed themselves.
There is no magic ten-year plan. The Governor cannot force
educational standards upward. There is no push button marked
"quality education."
This will be everybody's job. This is a call to arms. It is time
for North Carolinians to march— to start our march from the
forefront of the South to the forefront of the nation.
The route-of-approach is outlined in our plans and programs,
but the marching must be done by the people of North Caro-
lina—all of the people of North Carolina.
The objective is quality education for our boys and girls,
second to none. The objective is quality education which will
lift North Carolina in its every endeavor.
I have not covered everything. Education, like life in North
Carolina, is expanding, dynamic, and difficult to define in an
exactly outlined framework. Our plans can never be put in a
neat package in a showcase. They will be altered as we learn,
as we move forward.
It will take the best thinking of local school boards. I am
thankful for the dedicated citizens who make up these school
boards. I am thankful that tradition in North Carolina has
caused these school boards, with few exceptions, to be guided
by nonpartisan and nonpolitical motives.
It will take the best in leadership of the school administrators.
It will take the devotion and determination of the teachers.
Above all, it will take the understanding and support of all
the citizens, a willingness to go forward in the conviction that
all progress stems from education.
Shakespeare put it this way:
There is a tide in the affairs of men,
Which, taken at the flood, leads on the fortune,
Omitted, all the voyage of their life
Is bound in shallows and in miseries.
On such a full sea are we now afloat;
And we must take the current when it serves,
Or lose our ventures.
The "full sea" of which Brutus spoke is around us. The rising
tide is lapping at our feet. We cannot fail to see it unless we are
blind and cannot see or are fearful and will not open our eyes.
Education is the barque on which we must launch our hopes.
Through education of our people, the promise of the New Day
will be achieved. If we cling to it strongly enough it will lift us
on the floodtide of opportunity.
My faith always has been that the people of North Carolina
102 Papers of Terry Sanford
are ready to go— ready to make this New Day of opportunity a
New Day of achievement.
ASSOCIATION OF U. S. ARMY
BRAXTON BRAGG CHAPTER
Fort Bragg
January 24, 1961
[Within a month after assuming the governorship, Sanford presented an
address which he entitled "President Kennedy and the Quest for Peace." He
endorsed Kennedy's foreign policy and spoke of its meaning to persons in
uniform and to civilians who were concerned with the struggles for peace
and the future of the United Nations.]
President Kennedy at his inauguration aptly expressed the
determined spirit of this generation of Americans: "Born in this
century, tempered by war, disciplined by a hard and bitter peace,
proud of our ancient heritage— and unwilling to witness or per-
mit the slow undoing of those human rights to which this nation
has always been committed."
No group could better understand this determination and
no group could be more ready to fight to preserve these national
commitments than soldiers and ex-soldiers like yourselves. There
is no question about this readiness and willingness to fight and
die; the question is will we take the leadership in defending
"our ancient heritage" without fighting. Will we, again in the
words of John F. Kennedy, "begin anew the quest for peace,
before the dark powers of destruction unleashed by science en-
gulf all humanity in planned or accidental self-destruction"?
It is a paradox that fighting is less difficult for the democratic
mind to grasp than is the "quest for peace." Fighting unleashes
the native spirit, while the quest for peace requires all the re-
straints, and all the patience, and all the understanding with
which man, unhappily, is not naturally endowed at birth.
That has been the story of most wars. Patience, understanding,
restraint, not fully developed in man, failed.
You know better than many that talking is better than shoot-
ing, that negotiating is easier than digging foxholes, and that
debating— however vitriolic— burns a man less than white phos-
phorous or radiation.
Public Addresses and Summaries
103
The United States and the other nations of the world have
found in the last fifteen years around the tables of the United
Nations that restraint and patience are not natural attributes
of man, but they know bombast is better than bombs, and the
insult of words is less disrespectful than the insult of death.
When we are tempted to despair of the fruitless argument
around West 92nd Street, we might well remember the lethal
arguments around Bastogne, around Guadalcanal, and around
Pusan.
We all know that American military might is capable of de-
stroying Soviet cities, and Khrushchev's missiles could destroy
ours. This is the cold fact that has helped to keep the cold war
from growing too hot. This is why we continue to fight our
fights around the conference tables at the UN. I firmly believe
that the United Nations, supported by the strength of the United
States and other free nations, has kept us out of World War III.
Let's look at the United Nations. It has its shortcomings. It
has its frustrations, and it has had its failures. But the shadows
of its failures are not as wide as the brightness of its potential
and are not as dark as the threat of war. I believe any student
of the history of man would agree with me that the very exist-
ence of the United Nations is remarkable. It is a remarkable,
even if a somewhat faltering, step toward the universal peace for
which men have strived and for which women have yearned
since Cain killed Abel.
Here are sovereign nations sitting down together in the spot-
light of international attention and arguing their cases. Here
are the smallest nations of the earth occupying, on the platform
of the world, space equal to the largest countries. Here the poor-
est government is afforded the same rights as the richest gov-
ernment. Here in the United Nations are represented every
race, color, and creed.
The United Nations logically resulted from the devastation
of war and the aspirations of all men to be free, to be fed, and
to be able to face the future without fear.
If the United Nations has failed to do all that a war-weary
world in 1945 hoped it would do, we should remember that it
was a long and painful time in being formed. When early men
came down from the trees and out of the caves, it was natural
they should establish governments: first the family, then the
tribe, then the city-states and the kingdoms and empires.
Now the kingdoms and the nations and the empires long have
entered into alliances for mutual protection. There were con-
federations, the ententes, the axes.
104
Papers of Terry Sanford
Woodrow Wilson came along with his proposal for a new
kind of international combination, the League of Nations.
The United States, following the poor advice of that little
group of willful men, declined to join in Wilson's great experi-
ment. We refused to sit at the tables in Geneva.
I do not believe it an exaggeration to say the wounds we suf-
fered at Pearl Harbor, on the Anzio Beach, at the Battle of the
Bulge, and all the other battlefields of World War II were a
direct and tragic sequel to that refusal to enter the League.
In World War II we learned as we suffered. In 1945 America,
first under Franklin Delano Roosevelt and then under Harry
S. Truman, took the lead in establishing the United Nations.
I think I should point out here that North Carolinians indi-
vidually and North Carolina as a state helped pour the concrete
for the foundation of the United Nations. In 1941, before Pearl
Harbor, the North Carolina General Assembly, by an act known
as the Humber Resolution, called on the nation to move toward
the establishment of a world order with powers limited to mat-
ters of armament for the purpose of stopping war.
That action on March 3, 1941, by the General Assembly of
North Carolina will, I believe, rank in importance in our history
along with the Halifax Resolves and the Mecklenburg Declara-
tion, which were forerunners of the Declaration of Independence.
This was the first time in history that a state had taken such
a stand. More than thirty states followed suit.
I concur completely with the President of the United States,
who stated last week the official policy of this nation, that the
United Nations is "our last best hope in an age where the in-
struments of war have far outpaced the instruments of peace."
North Carolina will move in the front lines with the Presi-
dent in the march to the New Frontiers of freedom and peace.
We will honor and support his pledge "to prevent the United
Nations from becoming merely a forum for invective— to
strengthen its shield of the new and the weak— and to enlarge
the area to which its writ may run."
There are many here who wear the United Nations ribbon for
service in Korea. By many standards that war— or "police action"
if you prefer— was not a satisfactory war.
Of course, I have never heard of a war that really was satis-
factory. But before the partisan critics of the Korean War dis-
miss that conflict as "Mr. Truman's War," let them be reminded
of some places where the League of Nations did not fight. Let
them be reminded of the Rhineland, Austria, and Czechoslo-
vakia.
Public Addresses and Summaries
105
The United Nations, in Korea, fought and halted commu-
nism. The United Nations served notice that aggression would
not be tolerated. It is hard to estimate how many other small
nations have been able to preserve their integrity through this
timely warning of Korea. I am one who believes that those who
died in Korea did NOT die in vain.
The failures and the shortcomings of the UN have been well
publicized. But let's look at some of the other accomplishments
besides Korea.
Soviet troops were withdrawn from Iran after World War II
after the United Nations adopted a resolution calling for with-
drawal.
Fighting between India and Pakistan over Kashmir was halt-
ed after the United Nations Good Offices Committee intervened.
Dr. Frank Porter Graham*^^ of North Carolina was a key con-
ciliator in that cessation of hostilities.
Of course, the UN played a vital role in the Suez crisis, in the
Berlin blockade and right now is playing a vital role in the
Congo. Any one of these situations could have pushed us into
World War III.
But the United Nations has said to aggressors: "Halt!"
Aggression may succeed momentarily, but we will not let them
use Hungary as a stepping stone to further aggression like Hitler
used Czechoslovakia.
We will not let Korea or Laos go undefended like Manchuria
in 1931.
We will not permit imperialism, no matter under what name
it parades, use the Congo as a proving ground like Mussolini
used Ethiopia.
The United Nations has said to all: Trespassers will be prose-
cuted!
When aggressors and would-be aggressors recognize this fact,
then we can devote our efforts toward the abolition of disease
and hunger and make the United Nations the organization to
promote the welfare of all nations and of all men, women, and
children.
You as soldiers have been the protectors in war and the police-
men of peace. The cause for which you fought in Korea was
not only the defense of America but also defense of free men
Frank Porter Graham (1886- ), teacher, public official, World War I
veteran; President of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1930-1949;
member of various boards of importance, including the Carnegie Foundation,
Woodrow Wilson Foundation, National Council of Churches, Hampton Institute;
United States senator, administrator of United States Department of Labor, United
Nations representative for India and Pakistan. Powell, North Carolina Lives, 504.
106
Papers of Terry Sanford
everywhere. The Second, Third, Seventh, Twenty-fourth, Twenty-
fifth, Fortieth, and Forty-fifth Infantry Divisions and the First
Cavalry and the Marines and the Navy and the Air Force were
fighting under the United Nations flag as well as under the Stars
and Stripes.
Now the cynics throw up their hands in horror when the
United Nations fails as it failed at the time of the Hungarian
Revolution. The United Nations is impotent, they charge.
The United Nations has had its setbacks— Hungary was the
biggest.
But we don't abolish our Congress when it enacts a law which
doesn't work. And we do not disband our police force when
someone gets away with murder. We strengthen them!
To abandon or weaken the United Nations now would lead
to international anarchy.
Rather than abandoning the United Nations, rather than di-
luting our support of it, let us work from the blueprint drawn
by President Kennedy: "To invoke the wonders of science in-
stead of its terrors ... to explore the stars, conquer the deserts,
eradicate disease, tap the ocean depths and encourage the arts
and commerce."
NORTH CAROLINA PRESS ASSOCIATION
Chapel Hill
February 2, 1961
As he was to do on several occasions, Governor Sanford ad-
dressed members of the North Carolina Press Association. At the
1961 meeting, he compared the power of the press to the court-
room prosecutor, judge, and grand jury. This power carried
with it tremendous responsibility, and the Governor commended
the group for accepting its role. He congratulated the press for
the goodwill and good sense exhibited by North Carolina news-
papers in backing the sensible approach to the integration-segre-
gation question, giving credit to them for helping keep the
schools open during the crisis. The Governor then charged
them to help with the "equally difficult task of helping to im-
prove these schools."
Throughout the years of his tenure, Sanford's primary con-
cern was education. He addressed groups throughout North
Carolina and the nation on the subject, and his speech to the
Public Addresses and Summaries
107
North Carolina Press Association was no exception. He praised
the newspapermen for supporting the report of a fact-finding
group which had shown the critical ne^ds of the public schools.
After discussing plans for the financial support of the schools,
the Governor remarked that money was not the ^ole answer but
that the job could not be done without money. He concluded
that the story of education was important to all segments of the
public, was vital to those working on newspapers, and would be
the top story for the year 1961.
WILSON INDUSTRIAL COUNCIL
INDUSTRY AND EDUCATION DINNER
Wilson
February 6, 1961
As Governor Sanford traveled, he became more and more
convinced that North Carolinians were determined "to move
forward economically by taking full advantage of the consider-
able potential we possess in the fields of agriculture, industry,
and education." With human and natural resources being mar-
shaled into one big effort for higher standards and opportuni-
ties for all, he said that citizens were building for the future
and should not concentrate selfishly on the present. He com-
mended the Wilson Industrial Council for accepting such
responsibility. The Governor observed that economic diversity,
a problem in the eastern counties, had to become a reality. In
that area, "Agriculture is the backbone of the economy and
tobacco is the backbone of agriculture." Change was imperative;
diversification of agriculture and the establishment of an indus-
trial balance would reveal new economic activity in the east,
provide challenge and opportunity. To keep young people at
home, they would have to be supplied with knowledge, techni-
cal training, and desire. The burden of responsibility of meeting
the goals would have to be met by each individual who would
"dedicate himself to the task."
GRIFTON JUNIOR CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Grifton
February 10, 1961
Early in his administration. Governor Sanford undertook the
task of carrying his message of quality education to the people
108
Papers of Terry Sanford
of North Carolina. His talk to the Grifton Junior Chamber of
Commerce was one of those occasions in which the Governor
explained his program. He believed that the primary work of
the governor, the legislature, parents, and citizens was the edu-
cation of children. He explained the need for new classrooms,
more books, more teachers, attention to the mentally retarded
and the exceptionally talented. Programs for the groups at both
ends of the scale as well as for the average children would mean
provision "whereby the weak could grow strong and the strong
could grow great." The Governor concluded his talk with an
appeal to the Jaycees of Grifton and throughout North Carolina
to help in the effort to improve the educational opportunities
in the state.
FARMERS COOPERATIVE COUNCIL
OF NORTH CAROLINA
Raleigh
February 21, 1961
[In its February 20 issue, the News and Observers Farm and Home
Magazine carried a message from the Governor in which he stated that
"Kerr Scott got the farmer out of the mud; it is our job to get the farmer
out of the hole." The next day he spoke to farm leaders and reiterated his
stand to give emphasis to agriculture as the previous administration had
concentrated on industry. He encouraged a realistic understanding of the
situation and called for ideas which would result in a stronger farm econ-
omy. Appearing in September before the Farmers Cooperative Exchange,
Sanford again urged that steps be taken to move the farm economy upward.]
This conference here tonight is proof that farming is not dead
in North Carolina. This meeting of the leaders of all major
farm organizations in our state is an excellent example that
farmers are working together like never before to assure a
healthy gro^vth in North Carolina's most fundamental industry
—agriculture.
For the past several years, as I have traveled over our state,
I have pointed out something that all of you know but some-
thing that the skeptical seem to doubt: Far from being dead,
North Carolina's farms contain the seed for a great new harvest
of rural prosperity.
This conference shows that that was one campaign statement
which is irrefutable.
If anyone needs further evidence of the vitality and the po-
Public Addresses and Summaries
109
tential growth of our farms and of our farmers, let him read the
calendar of farm meetings in this state this week. To cite only
a few:
Monday through Saturday, cotton growers from the northeast
to the southwestern corners of our state are observing the Agri-
cultural Stabilization and Conservation "Highlight Week." Mon-
day through Wednesday, the first North Carolina barrow show
is being held in Johnston County. Monday, two-bale cotton
growers were honored at State College. Yesterday, a program on
cattle feeding was held at the Nash County courthouse. Yesterday,
a meeting on corn production was held in Martin County.
Tomorrow, a meeting on egg production will be held in the
same county. Tuesday through Thursday, a regional conference
on marketing is being held at the YMCA here in Raleigh. Tomor-
row, Ayshire breeders meet in Greensboro. Day after tomorrow,
Guernsey breeders meet in Durham. Thursday, Landrace hog
breeders will hold a sale in Rocky Mount Friday, Poland hog
breeders will hold a sale at Greenville. Thursday, a peanut prod-
uct meeting will be held in the Halifax County courthouse.
Thursday, a sweet potato show and a Negro 4-H Club sale will be
held in Rocky Mount. Friday, a beef cattle tour will be held in
Northampton County. Saturday, the Raleigh Production Credit
Association holds its annual meeting down the street from here.
Monday through Saturday is Future Farmers of America Week.
May I say here that it's easy to see from a schedule like this
why farm families find it easy to obey the Fourth Command-
ment and observe Sunday as a day of rest.
These meetings indicate the increasing diversity of North
Carolina's farming business. They show that farming is impor-
tant not only to the rural areas of our state but also to our
largest cities.
They suggest that what happens on the farm is significant to
what happens in the factory and the mill and the business office.
But, then, you here tonight don't need a lawyer to tell you
this. You know it.
You also are aware of the great irony of the rural economy in
our state: North Carolina, with some of the richest farmland in
the nation, has some of the poorest farms, and some of the most
underpaid farmers.
Why is this?
It can't be because North Carolina farmers don't work as
hard as farmers elsewhere. The acres of this state have been well
irrigated with the sweat of farmers.
It can't be because we've lacked rural leadership. We've grown
110
Papers of Terry Saxford
in this state some of the great farm leaders of the nation. To
mention just a few, our state produced Hugh Bennett/^ who
fathered the soil conservation program. We've had men like
Flake Shaw^o ^nd M. G. Mann^^ and Kerr Scott and Clarence
Poe.^- And as of tonight three of the most important agricultural
posts in President Kennedy's administration are filled by Harry
Caldwell,^^ Charles Murphy,^* and Horace Godfrey.^-^ Congress-
man Harold Cooley^^ from this district is chairman of the House
Agriculture Committee. L. Y. "Stag" Ballentine has worked long
and well as Commissioner of Agriculture.
I could go on, but those are enough to show that any poverty
of our farms cannot be blamed on poor leadership.
Nor can our farm problems be blamed on poor climate. We
have one of the best in the world. We have a long grooving
season.
Hugh Hammond Bennett (1881-1960), soil scientist, public official in state,
national, and international capacities; first chief of United States Soil Conservation
Service; named "father of soil conservation." Jaques Cattell (ed.), American Men
of Science: A Biographical Directory (Tempe, Arizona: Jaques Cattell Press, In-
corporated [Tenth Edition, revised, I960]) , Vol. A-E, 274.
R. Flake Shaw, farm leader from Greensboro; Executive Secretary of North
Carolina Farm Bureau Federation, 1940-1957; member of Board of Directors and
the Executi^•e Committee of the American Farm Bureau; member of Federal Reserve
Bank of Richmond. Information supplied by Irby Shaw \Valker, daughter of Flake
Shaw and employee of State Farm Bureau Federation.
®^ Manly G. Mann ('1889-1958), farm leader, railroad employee, bank official;
Director of North Carolina Cotton Growers' Association and of Farmers Cooperative
Exchange. News and Obsewer, November 16, 1952.
^ Clarence Hamilton Poe (1881-1964) , editor-publisher from Raleigh; holder of
honorary degrees from ^Vake Forest, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,
Washington College in Maryland, Clemson, and North Carolina State University;
editor of the Progressive Farmer, 1899-1953; member of the State College Board of
Trustees, State Board of Agriculture, Agriculture Committee of the United States
Chamber of Commerce, Committee on Rural Electrification; master of the State
Grange; elector for the Hall of Fame of Great Americans, 1925-1964. Powell,
North Carolina Lives, 981.
^ Harry B. Caldwell, farmer, co-operative executive from Greensboro; active in
North Carolina agrarian causes; Chairman of the Agricultural Advisory Committee
in ^Vashington; holder of other federal posts in the Hoover and Eisenhower ad-
ministrations. Powell, North Carolina Lives, 203.
^ Charles S. Murphy (1909- ) , lawyer, government official from Wallace;
educated Duke University; legislative counsel, United States Senate, 1934-1946;
administrative assistant to Harry S. Truman; lawyer engaged in active practice,
1953-1961; Under Secretary of Agriculture under John F. Kennedy. Powell, North
Carolina Lives, 896.
^ Horace David Godfrey (1915- ) , government executive; former Wake Coun-
ty farmer; holder of long record of government service, beginning with work in
the U. S. Department of Agriculture, 1934-1943; Mason and Grange leader; admin-
istrator of Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service. Powell, North
Carolina Lives, 491.
®« Harold D. Cooley (1897- ), lawyer and member of Congress from Nashville;
studied at Duke University and Law School of Yale University; member of Con-
gress from the Fourth District, 1934-19—; chairman of House Committee on Agri-
culture. Powell, North Carolina Lives, 282; North Carolina Manual, 1961, 504.
Public Addresses and Summaries
111
The farm problem of this state certainly cannot be explained
by a lack of water. We are heaven-blessed in this respect. Of
course, we have tended to squander this great resource. We have
let it flow down to the Atlantic without using it, and we have,
for entirely too long, let it carry away some of our best topsoil.
One of the outstanding extension programs is the one carried
on in this state.
So, we see that we have the people, we have the soil, we have
the climate and the water. We have everything necessary for
rural prosperity. In spite of all of these ingredients, we have not
discovered the proper recipe for putting them together. For last
year hundreds of North Carolina's family farms went out of
business. Many others operated in the red or barely broke even.
And our farm children moved away in droves as they reached
maturity.
The census of 1960 showed that the counties which lost
heaviest in population were the agrarian counties. Real farm
income continued to go down.
The low income of the majority of North Carolina's farms is
in large measure responsible for the low per capita income stand-
ing of North Carolina.
I have heard it happily explained that new industry, a new
plant, would solve the needs of people making inadequate
incomes on the farms now. This is misleading.
We cannot convert them all to industrial workers. The answer
is not to send them all to town. You know what there is in town
tonight. There are large numbers of unemployed and underem-
ployed workers already. Industrialization is one of the most urgent
needs of this state, but industrialization is not the answer to our
farm problems. We need new industry and will work toward
this goal, but we also need new income from the soil, and we
must work even harder for this goal, because the path is more
obscure.
I have no magic answer to the farm needs. I would hope that
you here tonight might from time to time suggest programs that
would help. From talking with you and farmers across the state,
it seems obvious that you have solved many of the problems of
production.
Now you face the problems of distribution. We need to grow
what will sell, and we need to sell it at a profit. The enormity of
the distribution problem can be grasped when we consider the
wheat and eggs and other commodities overflowing the storage
bins in this nation and the millions upon millions of hungry
men, women, and children in other nations.
As a matter of fact, we don't have to go to India or the Congo
112
Papers of Terry Sanford
or Latin America to find hungry people. When we acted last
week to bring North Carolina into the federal surplus food pro-
gram on a full-time basis, we found that upward of 500,000 North
Carolinians are underfed. Incidentally, I believe this surplus
food program is going to help two ways: First, it's going to help
feed the hungry; and secondly, it's going to help reduce farm
surpluses which have a habit of depressing the prices of the
current harvests.
One of the programs on which Kerr Scott was working when he
died was a World Food Bank. I am happy to see others are con-
tinuing that work. I am happy to see that President Kennedy has
carried this idea to the point of creating programs to carry out
this goal.
Our farm surpluses are greater weapons in this cold war
with communism than our atomic stockpile. Unhappily, they are
weapons we have barely used. These food surpluses are especially
potent weapons in a year when the Soviet and Chinese collective
farms have suffered one of their periodic failures.
If communism breeds on hunger, democracy can grow on
nourishment. It may well be that the minds of those uncom-
mitted millions around the globe will be won through their
stomachs.
Now let's come back closer to home in our look at government
and the farmer. Here in Raleigh for the last six years we saw
what a determined policy by state government could do in ex-
panding industry.
This administration means to give the same emphasis to farm-
ing in the next four years as was given to industrialization in the
last administration. First of all, let me say the door to the Gover-
nor's Office is going to be open as wide and as quickly to a farmer
as it is to an industrial prospect. And, I might add, it's going to
be open at all times to both.
I want your ideas and will help you put them to work.
I am happy to see the electric and telephone co-ops represented
here.
These co-ops lighted farm houses and brought phones to them
when they were needed. I am not picking any fight with the com-
mercial utility companies when I say that the co-ops will be
protected. There is room and there is need aplenty for both the
commercial and the co-operative utilities. You have done much
to lay the foundation for better rural life.
So long as people need food to eat, so long as they want tobacco
to smoke, so long as they require clothes to wear, and so long as
they need wood to build, then farming will be the major industry
of our state.
Public Addresses and Summaries
113
Let us use our imagination to develop our resources, to im-
prove our income, to widen our opportunities.
The answer to most of our problems— schools, roads, income-
lies in a stronger farm economy.
NORTH CAROLINA
PRISON DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL
Raleigh
February 22, 1961
Addressing personnel of the Prison Department, Governor
Sanford talked about prison administration. He discussed the
challenge facing these people, a challenge created by the growing
knowledge of human behavior and the science of government.
The Governor commended the state's prison officials for their
courage and competence, saying that the policies followed by
them reflected the thinking of foremost penologists and prison
administrators in the world. He explained that policy-making was
subject to change, but the basic guides, such as those outlined in
the Prison Department Guidebook, had to be followed. The
co-operation betwen the prison system and the Institute of Gov-
ernment in Chapel Hill in planning courses for personnel was
cited as a good example of the dynamic progress being made. More
and more use of probation and parole meant a higher percentage
of serious offenders remaining under the care of the prison
officials. Rehabilitation had taken on new meaning as programs
such as Alcoholics Anonymous, work release, education while in
prison, recreation, and job placement had been put into effect.
Governor Sanford made it clear that the prison personnel had
his support in the job they had to do.
CITY-WIDE PTA RALLY
Fayetteville
February 28, 1961
Governor Sanford stated that North Carolina had the resources,
the will, the opportunity to move; the result would be a new
day through education. He spoke of the PTA as a powerful force,
and he urged three lines of action: (1) increased attention to the
114
Papers of Terry Sanford
development of closer relationships between parents and teachers
with mutual trust, exchange of information, and extension of the
schools' guidance programs so that each child would have two
advocates— one at home and one at school; (2) promotion of
united efforts to secure for every child an educational opportunity
of high quality, though the achievement of this goal would
require agreement as to the kind of job the school should do so
that its primary objective of education would not be forgotten;
and (3) aggressiveness in political action to assure laws and
appropriations which would promote better public education for
all children. "Money will not do the job but we cannot do the
job without money." The Governor concluded by saying that the
support of quality education had to be "the first order of our
public business."
EDUCATION RALLY
Smithfield
March 9, 1961
[To emphasize Sanford's program of quality education for North Caro-
lina, a series of education rallies were held throughout the state; the guber-
natorial address was a feature of nearly all of these meetings. The Governor
often visited several schools in more than one county in a single day, making
as many as ten or twelve speeches. His ideas in the field of education were
repeated on numerous occasions, not only at rallies such as the one at
Smithfield but to the state's citizens by means of television and radio. His
first televised "Report to the People" incorporated many of the thoughts
presented to this smaller group; the "Report" is summarized on page 21.]
I come to you here tonight to continue the campaign seeking
the support of the adults of this state for the children of this
state. I have traveled many more miles across North Carolina dur-
ing the last thirteen months, asking for this support for the
schools, than I traveled all through World War II. I believe
this campaign we are waging for better schools is of equal— if,
indeed, not greater— importance than those campaigns of World
War II. For the first prerequisite to democracy is an educated
citizenry.
The decision on whether our schools shall be improved and
whether the education of our children shall be the first order of
business is now in the hands of the people of this state and their
elected representatives.
I have promised to work for the improvement of educational
opportunities. I have always said that I would do my duty in
Public Addresses and Summaries
115
recommending new taxes, if needed, to pay for those oppor-
tunities.
I have proposed a far-reaching program.
I have now proposed to your elected representatives in the
General Assembly the means of financing the part of the program
which requires expenditures.
The question of our schools and the question of our children's
education is now in your hands and the hands of your fellow
citizens across the state. Are you willing to pay the price for the
education of your children?
I think that all of us, no matter what our views on a particular
tax may be, can agree that there is no greater need in North
Carolina today than the improvement of the public schools.
There are too many unhappy statistics which cry out that need.
Let's look at the record and see how our state compares with
our sister states in education.
North Carolina ranks forty-fifth among the fifty states in the
amount of money we spend on each child going to school. We
spend an average of $240 a year for the education of each of
our school children in North Carolina. The average American
child has $369 a year spent on him.
North Carolina ranks fortieth in the per capita expenditure of
state and local governments for local schools.
North Carolina ranks forty-first in per capita expenditure of
state and local governments for all public education.
North Carolina in the last decade raised the rate of teachers'
salaries less than any other state in the union. Our teachers'
salaries were low in 1950 and far below the national average.
After ten years, those salaries were appreciably farther below the
national average.
North Carolina ranks forty-first in pupil-teacher ratio. That
means that forty states give teachers smaller class loads than we
require teachers of this state to teach.
Now let's look at some figures with a close correlation to those
I have just listed. Let's look at the result of our poor support of
our children's education.
North Carolina ranks forty-first among the states in the per
cent of adults with college diplomas.
North Carolina ranks forty-first among the states in the per
cent of our population fourteen years old and older who are
illiterate.
North Carolina ranks forty-fourth among the fifty states in
the percentage of adults with less than five years of schooling.
North Carolina ranks forty-fifth in the percentage of men
rejected by the armed forces because they were illiterate.
116
Papers of Terry Sanford
North Carolina ranks forty-seventh among the fifty states in the
median school years completed by adults— that is, persons t^venty-
five years old or older.
North Carolina ranks forty-eighth among the fifty states in the
percentage of our adult population who are high school gradu-
ates.
Now, let's look at one more brief set of statistics. I rather sus-
pect there is a strong cause-and-effect relationship between the
figures I have already listed and these I am about to list.
North Carolina ranks thirty-seventh among the states in
migration.
North Carolina ranks forty-third in per capita disposable
income.
North Carolina ranks forty-fifth in per capita income.
Lest someone accuse me of looking only on the dark side, let
me point out that North Carolina ranks eighth among the states
in the number of school children. That is our greatest asset.
But we have cultivated our children's minds less well than we
have cultivated our tobacco and cotton and peanut acres.
W^e have given proportionately less attention to the mainte-
nance of schools than we have to the maintenance of wardrobes,
our automobiles, and our kitchen stoves.
North Carolina is rightly concerned when anyone attempts to
lower our tobacco parity of 90 per cent.
Yet we have let our children's educational parity fall to less
than 66 per cent.
I could go on reciting statistics until midnight, but I believe
the ones you have just heard convince any sensible person
of the need.
These are the facts, these are the figures that ^ve must ^veigh
when we consider the admittedly unhappy prospect of new
taxes. These are the facts that I had to consider before I went
before the General Assembly of North Carolina Monday night
with the special budget message on education. These are the
facts your elected representatives of the General Assembly must
^veigh in the coming months.
These unhappy facts are the facts that every citizen must
^veigh.
The decision on the future of North Carolina schools is the
decision that will determine in large measure the future of oar
children. And, it is true, that the future of North Carolina will
be determined by the children.
That decision is in the hands of you, the adult citizens of
North Carolina.
Now in the last three days, there has been some talk that runs
Public Addresses and Summaries
117
about like this: "Yes, I favor the Governor's program for better
schools and better educational opportunities for my children, but
I don't like his tax idea."
Now we all agree that taxes are unpleasant.
But I know of few things in this world, though, that don't
require a price of some sort.
The Battle of the Bulge was not something that GI's went
into because they wanted to. They went in it and they fought
and they stuck because it was absolutely necessary to do so.
The alternative was worse than the fighting, the freezing, the
bleeding, and even the dying.
There was never a church built in North Carolina that didn't
require someone's sacrifice. There was never a foreign mission
established for which someone didn't have to pay in discomfort
or even suffering.
I am confident of the answer the General Assembly of North
Carolina will give to this program. I have faith in the people's
decision on this program.
Our state's record is too clear to doubt that decision. Our
grandfathers who supported Aycock at the turn of the century
and our fathers who supported the sales tax during the depression
have left a strong heritage to guide us.
Now let us look at the cost of better schools and better edu-
cational opportunities for our children.
I have proposed an across-the-board sales tax to pay for the
program.
I did so only after the most careful and conscientious con-
sideration. 1 eliminated getting the money for improving the
schools from the income tax because the federal government has
just about exhaused that source.
I eliminated the property tax because that is the chief and
one of the few taxes for local and county governments in paying
for the necessary services they provide.
I did not propose the crown tax on soft drinks for the same
reason that I did not propose a tax on candy bars, peanuts, or
ice cream cones. We already have a 3 per cent tax on these items.
I did not propose additional taxes on cigarettes. Cigarettes are
heavily taxed by the federal government, we tax them at 3 per
cent, and it would not bring in enough money to begin to do
the job.
I did propose as large an increase in whisky taxes as I believe
we could collect without driving trade to the woods.
This talk that tax should be put on whisky and cigarettes and
luxuries before we tax food and the other items that we will
tax by eliminating the exemptions is misleading and ignores the
118
Papers of Terry Sanford
fact that whisky, beer, wine, cigarettes, and the "luxuries" are
already taxed.
So, we must turn inevitably to the sales tax. There we have two
choices: Raise the rate on the items now taxed from 3 to 4 per
cent or eliminate the exemptions.
I fail to see that you treat the poor man any better by raising the
tax he must pay when buying his children blue jeans and shoes
and socks and underclothes than by eliminating the exemptions.
For that matter, an additional tax on cigarettes or on soft
drinks will hit the poor man just as hard as it does the wealthy.
The poor man drinks as much "pop" and smokes just as much
as the rich man. I'm not saying a poor man should smoke or drink
soda. But you and I know he does.
Now what about this tax on food. And when we talk of elimi-
nating the sales tax exemptions to raise the funds for better
schools we are talking about a tax on food. There is no beating
around the bush about it, for |50 million in the program for
education will be derived from the tax on food. This brings us
to a very simple decision. Do we want to pay 30 cents on every $10
worth of food in order better to prepare our children for life? I
honestly know of no other way.
I am well aware of the hardships of paying tax on necessary
items by those whose income is so low that every penny counts.
But I am also aware of the greater hardship placed upon the
children of these same people by inadequate school opportunities,
and I have been able to devise no way that the poorest can be
exempt from a general sales tax.
Welfare payments and the distribution of free food answer
the complaint raised in behalf of the poorest among us. I have
worked with other state officials to secure for the poor of this state
full advantage of the federal food surplus program. This program
already is underway.
I hope that those who may be tempted to speak out against the
food tax will suggest some painless way we can get the money.
I hope they will explain why it is fair to tax the food which
persons, including the poor, who must "eat out" pay on food at
cafes and restaurants. As you know, we have been taxing that food
since 1933. I hope they will remember that twenty-six of the
thirty-five states with sales tax, do NOT exempt food.
I hope also they will remember that if we tax bread we also will
be taxing cake; if we tax fatback, we also will tax caviar; if we
tax cornmeal, we also will tax filet mignon.
No one is going to go hungry because of this tax.
But the children of North Carolina will go thirsty for quality
education if we do not enact this program for better schools.
Sanford carried out his campaign promises despite the "Pie in the Sky" label
given by his opponents during the campaign. The event pictured here occurred on
May 11, 1960, in front of the Wake County Courthouse.
The Governor and his wife are shown participating in the Civil War Cen-
tennial observance.
Public Addresses and Summaries
119
The decision is just as simple as that. I am not trying to thrust
anything upon the people. I am trying to do my duty to serve the
future of our children, and I hope you will decide to help pay
the cost in order to have the quality of schools the future demands.
CONFEDERATE CENTENNIAL DAY
LOUISBURG
March 18, 1961
Speaking early in the observance of the Confederate Cen-
tennial, Governor Sanford observed that the past was being
commemorated and the future surveyed. Commemorating the
first raising of the Confederate flag in North Carolina, which
occurred in Franklin County when Major Orren Randolph
Smith and his neighbors flew their homemade one on March
18, 1861, the Governor said that North Carolina rose to the need
when volunteers were called. Though citizens of the present
might not agree with all the issues of the South of 1861, the
courage and devotion with which North Carolina served was
cause for admiration. Those who survived deserved recognition
for their part in creating one prosperous nation. The observance
in 1961 of what archivist and historian R. D. W. Connor called
a "victory of the vanquished" was a commemoration of the end
of the struggle which brought about a better union. Governor
Sanford voiced the opinion that if North Carolina of 1961
exercised the courage and devotion of North Carolina of 1861,
the fight for better schools would be won. The state, because of
its preparation for the future, had never wasted time moaning.
It would continue to fight for educational opportunities, would
continue to rise, and would continue to grow and move.
[In the absence of Governor Sanford, this speech was read by Thomas N.
Lambeth, Administrative Assistant.]
EDUCATION RALLY
GOLDSBORO
March 20, 1961
Speaking on the topic, "A Sense of Values," Governor Sanford
pointed out the fact that Governor Charles B. Aycock, whose
120
Papers of Terry Sanford
home was near Goldsboro, heralded a message similar to that of
his administration. He referred to the magic of radio, on which
this speech was carried, as illustrative of the different degrees of
education demanded of present-day students. He emphasized the
added significance of education, which could no longer be con-
sidered a luxury for the well-bred but was a matter of survival.
Leading authorities who had visited North Carolina had con-
sidered the long-range plan for quality education significant and
outstanding in America. Needs and costs had to be measured,
but the Governor expressed the belief that quality education was
worth almost any temporary sacrifice. The tax on food was less
objectionable than the neglect of full and adequate education for
all children. Expressing hope that the people of North Carolina
would support the program, the Governor urged consideration
by the General Assembly of ways of paying for the program.
Though the food tax seemed the only way to support quality
education, Sanford promised to consider any suggestions sub-
mitted to him. In 1949, 1953, and 1959, the people voted clearly
for education when they approved multimillion-dollar bond
issues; a vote in the affirmative in this case would mean a vote
for the future of North Carolina.
FUTURE FARMERS OF AMERICA
Coats
March 23, 1961
The Governor congratulated the Future Farmers group for
honors it had received, saying the teachers and the families
deserved credit for their contributions. He reviewed briefly the
history of the organization, pointing out that it had promoted in-
structional programs and rendered valuable service to students
and to the entire agricultural industry since its beginning in 1928.
He observed that action of the group was indicative of the fact
that North Carolina did not intend to get out of the farming
business.
Because students were concerned with subjects other than
agriculture. Governor Sanford discussed education in general,
talking about the program for a new day in North Carolina. He
said the state had to provide financial support, had to make teach-
ing a profession with the highest quality of training and per-
formance, had to insist on a better balance in the curriculum, and
had to guard time so as not to waste it on nonessential activities.
Public Addresses and Summaries
121
Governor Sanford elaborated on these points. He commented that
any youth failing to get the best education of which he was
capable had failed in his responsibility to himself, his state, his
nation. In the field of agriculture awards and competition had
been carried to the extreme; a balance in the curriculum had to be
maintained.
In conclusion, the Governor urged the fathers to support edu-
cation with taxes, the students to support education by hard
work and study. He said students should not consider their
education completed when they finished high school; opportuni-
ties for further training were available. He expressed confidence
that the youth of North Carolina would respond to the promise
of a new day and to the challenge before them.
REPORT TO THE PEOPLE
STATE-WIDE TELEVISION NETWORK
Raleigh
March 23, 1961
In a speech originating in the Raleigh studio of WUNC-TV,
Governor Sanford gave the first of many televised reports deal-
ing with the issue of North Carolina education. He urged citizens
to consider facts. The Governor cited many of the figures given
in his education rally speech in Smithfield on March 9 (see pages
114-119). Confronted by "these unhappy facts," Governor San-
ford urged each citizen to weigh his own set of values and decide
for or against a program of better education. Many people, he
said, favored lifting the educational standards but opposed new
taxes with which to implement the program. He reminded them
that few things required no price. Though the final decision would
be left to the General Assembly and the people of North Caro-
lina, the Governor's view was that the food tax was the only
feasible way of obtaining the needed solid financial foundation.
This conclusion was based on a study of the tax structure and
precedents set by other states and was drawn only after all
alternate proposals were deemed inadequate. Harder work from
teachers, more homework from students, more encouragement
from parents would make taxation seem the least of the sacrifices.
"Upon no other basis— at no less cost— can we fulfill the possi-
bilities of North Carolina."
122
Papers of Terry Sanford
NORTHEASTERN NORTH CAROLINA
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE
Tarboro
April 5, 1961
[The Department of Conservation and Development sponsored six con-
ferences to stimulate industrial development in various sections of North
Carolina. The Governor spoke at each of these gatherings, adapting his
message to fit local conditions. This address to the northeastern group is
given in full as it presents the over-all philosophy of the Governor in the
field of industrial development. The addresses presented in other areas on
May 3, June 6, September 7, November 2, and November 29 are summarized;
the summaries may be found on pages 129, 136-137, 174, 190-191, and 211-
212.]
I am happy to meet with you today in this important con-
ference of business, civic, and government leaders of northeastern
North Carolina. Your very presence here indicates to me that
you recognize the need for close co-operation in the develop-
ment of this area.
You have the guarantee of assistance from the Board and the
Department of Conservation and Development and all other
agencies of state government in building the economy of north-
eastern North Carolina. I want to extend to you my personal
pledge that the Governor's Office will be working with you and
for you as you move ahead.
By the same token, I challenge you to work with state govern-
ment and its agencies and, above all, to work with each other in
developing this area.
The time for petty rivalries is past. Neither northeastern North
Carolina nor any area of North Carolina can afford them. The
time for complacency also is gone. All we have to do to know
that we can and should do better is to read the population figures
for the last decade for the counties represented here today.
Of the twenty-one counties comprising this conference, eleven
lost population during the last decade. Most of the rest of your
counties barely held their own.
When we consider the high birth rate in northeastern North
Carolina, we begin to get the picture of how great the out-mi-
gration from this area really was.
In these twenty-one counties of northeastern North Carolina,
there was a bare 1.48 per cent gain in population in the 1950's.
In the state as a whole, there was a gain of 12.2 per cent in popu-
lation.
Some of the greatest losses North Carolina suffered in World
War I, World War II, and the Korean War did not occur on
Public Addresses and Summaries
123
the battlefields. Perhaps the greatest losses were the men and
women who went away to the service and to the war industries
and never came back because they found greater opportunities
in other states.
There's not a person here today who doesn't know of some
talented young persons who have moved away from this area and
this state to make a better living elsewhere.
You and I can understand the reason. North Carolina suffers
from one of the lowest per capita incomes in the nation. Yet the
per capita income of northeastern North Carolina is almost a
third less than the state's per capita. And, I repeat, the state's
per capita of $1,485 is nothing to brag about. The per capita for
this twenty-one-county area is only $1,052. Five of these twenty-
one counties did not build a single new industry in the fifties. I
know there are many reasons for this low figure. But there are
equally strong reasons why we can raise it substantially.
A good illustration of what we can do in northeastern North
Carolina, and in all of North Carolina, can be seen right here
in Tarboro. In recent years this town has added the payrolls of
Glenroit Mills, Carolina Plastics, and other companies.
These companies have pumped new opportunities not only
into Tarboro but also into all of Edgecombe County and north-
eastern North Carolina. They didn't just happen. These com-
panies came to Tarboro because the leaders here worked to bring
them to this town.
Now I'm not down here to tell you that industry is the answer
to all of our problems. It certainly is not. We are not going to
try to build here in this area— or in any other section of the
state— a Jersey City, or a Detroit, or a Pittsburgh.
I'm not sure we could if we wanted to and I don't think we
want to. One of the strengths of North Carolina has long been
its small towns and its medium-sized cities, drawing their man-
power and their raw materials from the nearby countryside.
What we need in northeastern North Carolina, and what we
need throughout North Carolina, is a balance between agricul-
ture, industry, and commerce. In this area, industry and com-
merce haven't achieved the proper balance with agriculture. If
we have two bad crops running, the courthouse yard is filled with
people.
The industry that we need in this area doesn't have to be of
the great proportions of DuPont at Kinston. We are very proud
to have the DuPont plant, but you know and I know that that
type of plant isn't built very often.
We are equally proud to have the home-grown and home-
manned plants like Monk Harrington's at Lewiston and Long
124
Papers of Terry Sanford
Manufacturing Company.
The biggest employer in North Carolina, Burlington In-
dustries, started as a small home-grown company. Cannon Mills
and Reynolds Tobacco Company are other examples which
prove that North Carolina can build great industries— as well as
import them.
So when we put the welcome mat out for the out-of-state
plants— and it is out and it's going to stay out as long as I am
Governor— we must not forget to leave the door open for our
neighbors down the street.
Whether we are seeking the plants of an out-of-state corpor-
ation or the expansion of established firms or the construction
of new home-grown companies, there are certain foundation
stones we must place. I believe the chief of these foundation
stones is attitude. The attitude we need in northeastern North
Carolina and the attitude we need all across this state is one that
discards with equal vigor defeatism on the one hand and com-
placency on the other hand. There really is no excuse for a
defeatist attitude anywhere in this state, least of all in north-
eastern North Carolina. The people are here and the land and
water and climate are here. The heritage of greatness also is
here.
In this area are located some of the great historic shrines of
America: the first English colony in the New World, the first air-
plane flight, the first declaration for American Independence; all
of these took place in the area you represent. They are natural
tourist attractions, as are the excellent hunting and fishing that
abound in this area.
As these great new interstate Highways 95 and 85 open up,
this area is going to become more and more a route of the tourists
moving south for the winter and north for the summer. I hope
you will help us in our efforts to persuade these travelers to spend
some time— and some money— in North Carolina. The State High-
way Commission, under the leadership of two men from north-
eastern North Carolina, Merrill Evans and Ben Roney,^"^ is work-
ing on plans to see that northeastern North Carolina benefits
fully from the new Cheasapeake Bay Tunnel.
Now while we're talking about transportation, I would like
to discuss an area airport with you. I know you have discussed
it many times in the past and some of you are still working for it.
I would hope that out of this conference would come the spirit
Benjamin E. Roney, from Rocky Mount; Administrative Assistant to W. Kerr
Scott during his terms as Governor and Senator; appointed Director of Secondary
Roads by Governor Sanford, July, 1961. See Governor Sanford's news release of
June 29, 1961.
Public Addresses and Summaries
125
of co-operation and determination that would at long last make
such an airport possible.
Last week, I had the opportunity of helping to celebrate the
first flight on Piedmont Air Lines route from Norfolk to Tennes-
see. That route will include stops at Elizabeth City and Rocky
Mount. This was a step— or a flight— in the right direction.
But we know that in order to gain adequate airline service,
this area of Rocky Mount, Wilson, Greenville, Goldsboro, and
Kinston needs a consolidated airport. If cities the size of Raleigh
and Durham or Greensboro and High Point find it beneficial
to consolidate their efforts in joint airport operations, wouldn't
it be likely that your cities could also benefit from a joint effort?
This takes us back to attitude. No one of the counties or cities
of this area can achieve its full potential working by itself. Work-
ing together, with an attitude of enlightened self-interest, you
can change the face of this area.
A good illustration of what can be accomplished by joint
effort is East Carolina College, Atlantic Christian College, the
College of the Albemarle, and Elizabeth City Teachers College.
These institutions were not the result of the efforts of a single
community. They resulted from the devotion and work of people
all across this area.
The attitude that we need to build this area and this state
starts at the individual level. There is not a single person here
today, and I doubt if there is a person living in northeastern
North Carolina, who would not readily agree that we need
improvement. We're all for progress. But whether we achieve
progress or not will require something more than a vague desire.
Here are some of the hard questions we must answer if we
truly want a better economy for ourselves and a better opportunity
for our sons and daughters in this area: Are you willing to sell
land that has been in your families for generations, and sell it at
reasonable prices, to give new companies a place to locate? Are
you willing to face some competition from new firms for workers?
Are you willing to extend some honest-to-goodness southern
hospitality to new people with different accents? Are you willing
to restore and maintain the cleanliness of our streams for the
man and the town downstream? Is your civic pride strong
enough to make you clean up the eyesores of your town and
county and build the facilities we need to attract industries and
tourists— and to hold your own sons and daughters who have been
leaving this area in great number? Is your civic pride enlightened
enough to thrust off petty jealousies in order to work in a co-
operative campaign for the good of this whole area? Are you
willing to invest your time, your effort, and your money to
126 Papers of Terry Sanford
make your town, your county, your area, and your state a better
place?
If I were not confident of your answers, I would not be here
today.
Northeastern North Carolina is rich in history.
It's richer still in its potential.
I look forward to working with you to achieve that potential.
NORTH CAROLINA MOTHER'S DAY PROGRAM
Raleigh
April 10, 1961
In this tribute to the mother of the year, Governor Sanford
spoke both personally and as a representative of the state.
Charles B. Aycock's mother, he pointed out, could neither read
nor write; this factor inspired her son toward a successful career
and helped give birth to the reality of universal education in
North Carolina. Sanford paid tribute to the debt he owed his
mother for instilling in him a keen interest in education. The
Governor praised mothers and their many roles, challenging them
to help build the quality of North Carolina education by co-oper-
ating with teachers and by encouraging children to take advan-
tage of their opportunities.
FOURTH ANNUAL AUTHORS LUNCHEON
GOLDSBORO
April 18, 1961
This annual literary tribute at which Governor Sanford spoke
was sponsored by the Goldsboro Rotary Club and the libraries of
Wayne County. He praised the interest of the group in good
literature, adding that too often leaders failed to appreciate and
promote cultural activities. Turning his remarks to the particular
author and book being honored, Oliver Orr, Charles Brantley
Aycock, he said this was an appropriate time "to take cognizance
of the high ideals and dedication to the common good" expressed
by Governor Charles B. Aycock. The Governor described Oliver
Orr's biography of Aycock as a real contribution to literature, a
book in which Aycock was divested of abstractions and vague
Pictured above are the (iovernor's parents, Mr. and Mrs. Cecil Sanford
Laurinburg.
Over 40,000 letters were received and answered after the Governor asked school
children to write to him on the subject of quality education. He is shown here
with Judy Pleasant, of Sherwood Bates School in Raleigh, and her letter on March
3, 1962.
Public Addresses and Summaries
127
references and a book which revealed an image in which the
man stood tall. The book contributed to an understanding of
present-day objectives, and in closing, Governor Sanford quoted
Aycock's words:
"I would have all our people to believe in the possibilities of North Caro-
lina; in the strength of her men; the purity of her women, and their power
to accomplish as much as can be done anywhere on earth by any people. I
would have them to become dissatisfied with small things; to be anxious for
higher and better things; to yearn for real greatness; to seek after knowledge;
to do the right thing in order that they may be what they ought. I would
have the strong to bear the burdens of the weak and to lift up the weak
and make them strong— teaching men everywhere that real strength consists
not in serving ourselves but in doing for others."
1961 CONVENTION OF NORTH CAROLINA
CONGRESS OF PARENTS AND TEACHERS
Winston-Salem
April 19, 1961
When he addressed the 1961 meeting of the Congress of Par-
ents and Teachers, Governor Sanford was careful to direct his
remarks on education so that they were appropriate for his
audience. He spoke of the broad interests of the group and of the
purposes of the PTA organization. Sanford challenged the group
"to move out into a fuller realization of this broad area of
responsibility that you have set for yourselves." Welfare of
children was a primary concern of the PTA, and the Governor
reminded those in attendance that they, as parents and teachers,
were in a strategic position to accomplish this aim. Citing educa-
tion as the only means of achieving a new day, the Governor
called for the support of the PTA in the endeavor to raise the
educational level of North Carolina. He specifically called for
co-operation in three areas: the formation of a closer relationship
between parents and teachers; aggressive promotion to secure for
every child educational opportunity of high quality, including,
of necessity, selectivity with regard to extracurricular activities
and use of school time; and active political action to win approval
by the legislators of laws and appropriations which would promote
education. Governor Sanford elaborated on each point and again
concluded with a call for co-operation and a pledge of his help.
128
Papers of Terry Sanford
SALUTE TO EAST CAROLINA COLLEGE
Greenville
April 26, 1961
The Governor expressed pleasure at the opportunity of joining
Pitt County and the state in this salute to East Carolina College.
From an opening in 1909 to 106 students, the enrollment had
grown to 4,599. The institution was approved by ten major
accrediting associations, had a faculty of which half had doctoral
degrees, and trained more teachers than any other college in
North Carolina and was fifth in the nation in this regard. The
Governor called the school "the artery of the educational blood-
stream of eastern North Carolina." He recognized the indebted-
ness of the state to the administration, the trustees, and the
faculty of former and present years. In urging students to pay
the greatest salute possible to East Carolina College by remaining
in North Carolina to live and work, he referred to the state as
one "on the go!" He said the state had expressed faith in the
students by supporting the college, and he had confidence that
the students would prove their faith in the state by remaining in
North Carolina.
BATH HIGH SCHOOL CHAPTER OF
FUTURE FARMERS OF AMERICA
Bath
April 28, 1961
The occasion for this address was a father-son banquet, which
Governor Sanford noted as particularly appropriate because of
the close relationship between farm and home. He praised the
Future Farmers program, saying that an enviable record of group
activity and individual accompUshment had been set at Bath. He
then discussed vocational agriculture and its role in North
Carolina's new day. Pointing out the obvious need for production
and prosperous agriculture in the state led to the comment that
all FFA members studied subjects other than agriculture and all
should be interested in education in general. The Governor pro-
ceeded to discuss the over-all program for quality education.
As he had done on other occasions, the Governor stressed the
need for fathers to support public education with taxes, for stu-
dents to support it by hard work and study, and for students to
Public Addresses and Summaries
129
remember that their education would not be completed with high
school graduation. In concluding his address, Sanford told tihe
audience that a bright future, through hard work, was ahead for
North Carolinians in the new day.
SOUTHEASTERN NORTH CAROLINA
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE
Clinton
May 3, 1961
The Governor, in his second industrial development conference
address, again urged the people of the area to seek to realize the
full potential which was awaiting them. He outlined resources of
a good water supply, the deep-water ports, forests, rich soil, and
excellent climate of the southeastern region, adding that these
were the advantages to be used in attracting industry rather than
tax gimmicks and tax rebates. Sanford also reminded his audience
of the man-made resources, such as good roads. He urged the
southeastern citizens to provide needed facilities so that big
conventions could be held in the area; he also encouraged the
establishment of additional food processing plants. North Caro-
lina, once called the "Rip Van Winkle State" had been more
recently called the "State on the Go"; this change was attributed
to the attitude and hard work of citizens like those attending the
Clinton conference.
DEDICATION ADDRESS AT
WASHINGTON COUNTY UNION SCHOOL
Roper
May 4, 1961
Speaking at the dedication of Washington County Union
School, the Governor again sounded his keynote of education.
After referring to the importance of this school to the economic
future of Washington County and North Carolina, he referred to
quality education as a prerequisite, as the foundation of the
needs and hopes of the nation. He called education "life and
growth and happiness." The Governor continued by explaining
the program for education, its cost, and its need. He said that
130
Papers of Terry Sanford
North Carolina's rank of eighth in the number of school children
was the state's greatest asset. ''But we have cultivated our
children's minds less well than we have cultivated our tobacco
and cotton and peanut acres." This school was called proof that
the state would pay for quality education, and the Governor
concluded by calling on educators, teachers, and students to
meet their respective responsibilities.
SIXTY FIFTH ANNUAL CONVENTION
NORTH CAROLINA BANKERS ASSOCIATION
PiNEHURST
May 9, 1961
The Governor began by praising bankers for their willingness
to accept community responsibility. The promotion of economic
growth in the state was advantageous to bankers and to all
North Carolinians, and the Governor stressed the importance of
the fact that a large number of people looked to those in the
banking profession for "guidance and leadership, for advice and
encouragement in many activities affecting, not just themselves,
but their communities as well." He expressed the opinion that
those living today would have to dedicate themselves to the obli-
gations and opportunities of the day so that future generations
would look back to this generation with pride and gratitude.
While many parts of the nation were standing still or losing
ground, North Carolina was moving ahead. With the future
looking brighter for the nation as a whole. North Carolina stood
in an excellent position to accelerate its economic development.
Bankers as individual citizens and as leaders were faced with a
big responsibility; Governor Sanford assured them that he knew
they would measure up to this challenge as they had done to
those of the past.
OHIO VALLEY INDUSTRIALISTS AND BUSINESSMEN
Pittsburgh, Columbus, Dayton, Indianapolis, Cincinnati
May 22-26, 1961
[Though Governor Sarjford stressed quality education as his number-one
interest, industrial growtti was not neglected. Accompanied by thirty-five
of the state's leading businessmen, who traveled at their own expense, the
Public Addresses and Summaries
131
Governor launched a five-day "good will" industrial promotional tour. He
spoke at several major cities, advertising North Carolina's assets and denying
allegations of piracy and gimmicks to attract industries to the state. Leaving
Raleigh during the meeting of the General Assembly for a tour such as this
was considered by some to be unorthodox, but the timing proved perfect.
By June 6 Press Secretary Graham Jones issued a preliminary report show-
ing that eighty-eight companies had expressed interest in the possibility of
locating plants in North Carolina, with three firm commitments to locate
in the state immediately. Excerpts from the Ohio Valley speeches are given
here.]
North Carolina once was called, by one of its own historians,
the "Rip Van Winkle State."
We're here to tell you that this Rip Van Winkle woke up.
Today North Carolina truly is the "State on the Go."
It is the "State on the Go" in industry, in commerce, in agri-
culture, and in education.
In the last decade, more than $1.5 billion was invested in new
and expanded industrial plants in North Carolina.
In the first quarter of this year, our state broke all records in
erecting new industry— more than $42 million worth.
During the recession of 1960, North Carolina's economy ex-
panded. A recent United States Department of Commerce report
pointed out: "Business in North Carolina generally held firm
during 1960 despite reported recessive downtrends in the nation."
The truth of the matter is that during the recession year of
1960, North Carolina was compiling a new record of industrial
growth. In 1960 we added more than $235 million in new and
expanded manufacturing plants.
Now my administration and the citizens of North Carolina
don't mean to slow down in our industrialization campaign. We
mean to accelerate that industrial drive!
That's why we're here.
There is profit in North Carolina for new industry. North Caro-
lina is the leading industrial state of the fastest growing new
market in America, the Southeast.
We have not come here to beg handouts. We've come to talk
business with the leaders of this great industrial area who have
plans for expanding into new markets.
We have not come here to try to uproot or transplant
established factories. We have come to get the seeds for industrial
plantings for our fertile fields of North Carolina.
This North Carolina industrial mission is not an invasion. It
is an invitation to businessmen interested in expanding their
industries and increasing their profits.
This is not a raid. It is a good will mission.
We are not here to engage in plant piracy. We are here to
132
Papers of Terry Sanford
encourage industrial expansion. We haven't come to steal, we've
come to sell— to sell North Carolina as a profitable site for
expanding industries.
We're not offering gimmicks. We're offering reciprocal and
mutually profitable interstate trade.
For more than a century, North Carolina has exported young
people to this area. And for more th^n a century, we have
imported your manufactured products. Now we're ready to
trade our production and market opportunities for your branch
plants.
I would like to list briefly some of the assets of North Caro-
lina which have attracted new industry, both native and out-of-
state, and some of the assets which have made these new industries
profitable to their management and to their stockholders.
First, North Carolina has an abundance of rich land from the
Coastal Plain of eastern North Carolina to the red clay of the
Piedmont and the Blue Ridge and Smoky Mountains of western
North Carolina.
North Carolina has a heaven-blessed water supply. Our precipi-
tation is almost double the national average. We have an annual
average rainfall of fifty inches and a practically untapped volume
of ground water.
North Carolina has an excellent temperate climate which gives
the farmer a long growing season and the industrialists a year-
round manufacturing season.
North Carolina has one of the best moving transportation
systems in the nation.
We have long been known as the "good roads state." This was
true when George Washington and General Lafayette traveled
over our roads in the eighteenth century. It also is true
today when 99 per cent of North Carolina's population live either
along paved roads or within a mile of a paved road. Recently,
the United States Bureau of Roads issued a report showing that
North Carolina ranks ninth among the states in the number of
miles of the new interstate highway system open to traffic.
Complementing our highway system— which, incidentally is
the largest in mileage maintained by any state government— are
the tracks of twenty-eight railroads.
We have excellent passenger and freight service by airlines, and
we're improving that service almost daily.
As far as port facilities for import and export trade are con-
cerned we are this year approving a multimillion dollar expansion
program at our deep-water ports. That expansion program is
going to increase the shipping capacity of the state ports at More-
head City and Wilmington by 65 to 70 per cent.
Public Addresses and Summaries
133
All of these transportation facilities combine to give North
Carolina manufacturers easy accessibility to national and inter-
national markets.
Now let's turn to government.
North Carolina's state government always has reflected the will
of the people that it serves. Like the citizens of North Carolina,
our state government has been not the last to cast the old aside,
nor yet the first the new to accept. We have been in North
Carolina neither radical nor reactionary. We have built steadily
and we have built solidly.
Since the year of 1900, there has not been so much as a breath
of scandal in North Carolina's state government. Without any
self-praise, I can honestly report: "Good Government is a Habit
in North Carolina."
Because of this stable and business-like operation of our state
government. North Carolina's credit rating ranks at the very
top— triple A— on Wall Street. Moody's lists our state bonds as
among the safest buys in the nation.
Of course. North Carolina's government— state, county, and
municipal— is simply a reflection of our state's greatest asset: the
citizens of North Carolina.
We have enjoyed excellent labor relations in North Carolina.
In 1960, North Carolina lost less than .005 per cent of total work-
ing time to strikes. In fact, strike-caused production and working
time losses dropped to an all-time low in North Carolina in 1960.
We also have enjoyed in North Carolina harmonious race
relations. Not a single school has been closed a single day in
North Carolina since the Brown decision on school desegregation.
I might add that when a Negro student earns the editorship of the
North Carolina Law Review/^ as he did recently, it makes more
news in other states than it does in North Carolina. There is a
mutual respect between the races— white, Negro, and Indian— in
our state.
Another blue chip stock that North Carolina has to offer is our
educational system, from the first grade through the graduate
school. This year I have proposed, and the General Assembly is
now considering, a major advance for our public schools. I pro-
posed this program, and the General Assembly is considering it
with favor, because we believe good educational opportunities
are the first prerequisite to industrial, agricultural, and personal
growth.
We believe you will be interested in this education program
^J. Le Vonne Chambers, editor of the North Carolina Law Review, 1961-1962
(Vol. 40).
134
Papers of Terry Sanford
of progress because it is that program that will train the executives
and the employees for the plants you locate in North Carolina.
Incidentally, to raise the revenue for that program, I have pro-
posed elimination of sales tax exemptions. The one tax source
that both the administration and the legislature ruled out from
the beginning was any increase in income taxes— either corporate
or personal.
A good example of the interdependence of industry and educa-
tion in North Carolina is our new Research Triangle. That tri-
angle, composed of Duke University at Durham, the University
of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and North Carolina State
College at Raleigh, is designed to utilize to the fullest possible
extent for industry, commerce, and government the brain power
of those three great institutions of higher learning.
The businessmen of North Carolina have contributed millions
of dollars for the establishment of the Research Triangle Park
on which are being built great new laboratories for science and
technology.
These, then, are some of the assets of North Carolina.
These are the assets that attracted to North Carolina in recent
years new plants of companies like DuPont, General Electric,
Westinghouse, Western Electric, Douglas Aircraft, Ford Motors,
Alcoa, Pittsburgh Plate Glass, Sperry Rand, Dayton Rubber,
Firestone, and U. S. Rubber— to mention just a few.
These are some of the assets that have helped such companies
grow in North Carolina and grow profitably.
North Carolina has not gone in for tax rebate gimmicks in
the past and we have no intention whatsoever to dangle them in
the future. We don't offer such gimmicks because they would
be unfair to established industries and because we have learned
by observation that the industry looking for such gimmicks makes
a poor corporate citizen.
We are not seeking new industry just to add smokestacks to
the skyline of North Carolina. We are seeking new industries to
provide better opportunities for North Carolinians to make better
livings.
North Carolina is advertising efficient and hard-working
employees— not cheap labor.
North Carolina is selling its good climate— both industrial and
weather— not a sweatshop atmosphere.
North Carolina is promoting an equitable corporate and
individual tax rate— not tax gimmicks and rebates.
North Carolina is a good site on which to manufacture and a
good market in which to sell.
Most important of all. North Carolina, with its historical.
Public Addresses and Summaries
135
cultural, and vacation varieties that extend from the Atlantic to
the Smokies, is a good place to live.
There is profit in North Carolina. We invite you to come and
share it with us.
GRADUATION EXERCISES, HIGH POINT COLLEGE
High Point
May 28, 1961
Speaking on the topic, "The Private College in the Pattern of
Educational Opportunity," Governor Sanford told students that
they were graduating from a time-honored institution. With 47
per cent of North Carolina students in institutions of higher
learning attending church-related colleges, the role of these
schools was of concern and interest to the state. The church
schools served the dual purpose of promoting Christian education
and filling a need as part of the total higher education effort. The
Governor remarked that a partnership existed between private
and public colleges, but the theory of separation of church and
state was jealously guarded.
The magnitude of the operation of educational institutions of
higher learning meant the necessity of examining the total picture,
including curriculums, quality of instruction, and the role of
liberal education. The Governor elaborated on each of these
points, concluding that co-operative effort on the part of both
public and private institutions was required. He explained to the
graduates that they owed a debt to their schools and to the
state, a debt which could be paid only by serving in positions of
leadership and by helping find answers to the problems of the day.
WOMAN'S COLLEGE ALUMNAE OF WAKE COUNTY
Raleigh
May 29, 1961
In addressing the alumnae of Woman's College, the Governor
spoke on the total co-ordination of public education. With
student population increasing, the best possible education would
have to be made available at the lowest cost. He discussed three
alternative decisions facing those in positions of planning for
the state's education: to do nothing; to continue in the pattern
136
Papers of Terry Sanford
the state was then following; to develop a planned pattern of
educational opportunity from elementary school through the
graduate school. The latter course, involving further development
of community colleges and industrial education centers, was
imperative to the state's future. Sanford spoke of the need for
leadership which was not "saddled to the status quo." The
consolidation of the University of North Carolina in the 1930's
required vision and planning; results of that move had been
applauded. The Governor said he wanted to urge groups such
as this to contribute to the solution of problems facing education
in North Carolina by study, criticism, and support.
PRESBYTERIAN JUNIOR COLLEGE COMMENCEMENT
Maxton
June 5, 1961
More than 4,000 students, including the Governor himself,
studied at Presbyterian Junior College between the time of its
opening on September 4, 1929, and the time of the 1961 com-
mencement exercises. Governor Sanford expressed the hope that
the 1961 graduates would be stimulated to assume roles of leader-
ship by the contributions of former students and the ideals of
higher education learned at the school. He noted plans for the
opening of St. Andrews College, observing that the new college
showed the strong faith of the Presbyterians in higher education.
He praised expansion being made by many denominations, point-
ing out the need of support for church-related colleges. Stressing
the importance of education, Sanford said, "Quality education is
the vitamin for personal growth and economic growth." In his
closing remarks, the Governor said he "did not come to preach a
eulogy for Presbyterian Junior College," but "to take part in the
baptism of a larger education endeavor." He expressed belief that
the spirit of the old would thrive as an integral part of the new
St. Andrews College.
WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE
(Delivered by Hargrove Bowles, Jr.)
Waynesville
June 6, 1961
The recreational potential of western North Carolina would
Public Addresses and Summaries
137
have to be complemented with industry, the Governor told the
Western North Carolina Industrial Development Conference, and
he pledged the co-operation of state agencies. Industry would have
to be offered technical services, repair services, and stability in
community and area growth. Sanford said that businessmen
investigating the suitability and potentials of a city would consider
whether or not the community had measured its future needs
and had realistically planned and budgeted for those needs. A
city needed to know which sites were available for industry and
should require appropriate zoning. Development of resources,
however, included development of human resources. In this area
lay the importance of industrial education centers. The Governor
spoke of the importance of the Western North Carolina Regional
Planning Commission, established in 1957, in helping answer
questions about sound growth for the future. A plan of action for
the full development of the area would demand local initiative
and hard work, co-ordinated with local and regional programs.
NORTH CAROLINA ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS
Durham
June 8, 1961
[In his address to the broadcasters of North Carolina, the Governor re-
viewed the action of the 1961 General Assembly. He dubbed this legislature
one "with a conscience," and he gave a sympathetic appraisal on most points.
He singled out for praise the educational program adopted by the session.
The address was carried "live" to the citizens of North Carolina.]
I appreciate the opportunity of meeting with the radio and
television leaders of North Carolina.
I especially appreciate the "live" coverage of these remarks on
the state-wide networks you have set up.
As those of you here in this room know, I was one of your
frequent customers last year. The only difference is that last year
you made me pay every time I went on the air.
Now to demonstrate my appreciation for this free time you've
given me today, let me assure all the stations on this network
that I will quit in plenty of time for the commercial.
I am grateful for the opportunity not only to speak to the
radio and television broadcasters but also to address the citizens
all across North Carolina. I have said on several occasions that as
Governor of a state with four and a half million citizens, who live
from the Atlantic to the Smokies, there is only one way I know
138
Papers of Terry Sanford
to speak directly to the entire citizenry at one time, and that is
through the radio and television networks of the state.
Since my inauguration six months ago this week, I have had
several occasions to request the radio and television stations to
clear time so that I might report directly to the people on matters
of importance to the state.
I am happy to say, the radio and television stations have never
let us down.
This co-operation is typical, I believe, of the strong public
service spirit that prevails in the broadcasting industry of North
Carolina. Recently, my desk has been flooded with letters from
stations agreeing to carry— without any charge to the taxpayers—
"spots" advertising North Carolina as a "Variety Vacationland"
and as a good place for new industry to earn profits.
But broadcasting is more than just a "fair weather" friend.
I would like to remind the listeners of this broadcast that every
time they hear the buzz of a Conelrad test on their radios, they
are hearing another example of the support the broadcasting
industry of North Carolina is rendering our national preparedness
program.
The television and radio stations have given generously of their
time and their money in alerting the citizens of our state of
impending natural disasters. The hurricanes we have suffered in
recent years in North Carolina cost the state many millions of
dollars in property damage. But imagine, if you can, the lives
that were NOT lost because the population had the advance
warning from the "hurricane watch" broadcast by TV and radio
stations.
I want to express particular praise for the television stations
that have participated in the "in-school" teaching programs and
those which have helped teach adults how to read and write. This
is a vital program in a state where the adult illiteracy rate is
almost the worst in the nation.
On behalf of the people of North Carolina, I thank the radio
and television stations of North Carolina for their public service
programs.
It has been suggested that I use this occasion to give the people
of North Carolina a report on their 1961 General Assembly,
which, at this very moment, is working in Raleigh to build a
stronger North Carolina with greater opportunities for all the
citizens. I welcome the opportunity.
I understand, from a radio news report I heard en route to
Durham, that the General Assembly is expected to begin voting
within the hour on the most important single piece of legislation
that has come before a North Carolina General Assembly since
Public Addresses and Summaries 139
the days of Governor Charles Brantley Aycock.
That legislation, of course, is the educational program.
I would not be so presumptuous as to predict the exact vote
on either the appropriations bill or the revenue bill. But I will
tell you this: If I were not absolutely confident that majorities in
both the Senate and the House share with me a strong determi-
nation that our sons and daughters shall receive educational
opportunities equal to the best and second to none, I would not
be addressing you today.
Last year I broadcast from Wilmington to Asheville the fact
that if the citizens of North Carolina elected me their governor,
quality education would be the overriding goal of my admini-
stration. I have tried not to backtrack a single step and not to
deviate a single degree from that goal.
On occasion in the past six months, some have suggested that
I might twist some legislative arms on the many issues before the
General Assembly.
I have chosen not to twist any arms. I made that choice because
I have complete confidence in the vision, judgment, and integrity
of the General Assembly.
North Carolina has moved into the mainstream of America.
I am happy to acknowledge that this move has been made
possible by the strong oarsmanship of the members of the 1961
General Assembly.
The education program is en route to passage. Its adoption is
going to mean a stronger state— a state stronger in industry,
stronger in commerce, stronger in agriculture. For the children
of our state, this quality education program is going to mean
richer minds— as well as richer pocketbooks.
There are those who have agreed with us that we needed to
appropriate substantially greater sums to teach the children. But
they kick up their heels in horror over the taxes needed to pay
for quality education if we had not adopted this program.
Let me very briefly summarize my feelings on the new school
taxes. It would have been nice to get the money for better educa-
tional opportunities from taxes on luxuries like mink coats.
But there just aren't enough mink coats sold in North Carolina
to raise the revenue the state must have if it is to adopt the
quality education program.
No one is going to go hungry because of the tax on food items
not presently taxed.
But the children of North Carolina would have gone thirsty
for quality education if we had not adopted this program.
I am happy to report to the citizens of North Carolina that a
majority of their legislators have the courage to stand up and be
140
Papers of Terry Sanford
counted— not only for appropriating the funds for quality educa-
tion but also to pay the cost of that program by voting for the
revenue— a revenue vote without which the appropriation vote
would be meaningless.
Now some honest and conscientious persons have objected to
the tax on food on the grounds that tihere are undernourished
people in North Carolina.
There are undernourished people in North Carolina— entirely
too many.
It would be a pittance, and a fraud to claim we would be
alleviating their poverty by allowing them to retain the few
pennies involved in the new school taxes. To do this would not
help them, but it would damage seriously the opportunities of
their children, and all children, for a better education and a
better living.
We have a better solution to help the poor. The administration,
working closely with the General Assembly, has moved quickly
and definitely to do something about empty stomachs. We have
brought North Carolina for the first time into active participation
in the surplus food program. A number of counties already have
joined in this program. And, I am reliably informed, many more
counties will join soon after the start of their new fiscal year next
month.
The General Assembly has tentatively approved substantial
increases in the appropriations for welfare funds.
The record of the 1961 General Assembly on the entire matter
of helping the needy of our state has been the best of any legisla-
ture in a long time. This General Assembly has tentatively adopted
appropriations that will provide for increased benefits for the
hungry, the indigent old, the crippled, and the dependent chil-
dren of North Carolina.
On another highly important measure, the 1961 General
Assembly overwhelmingly adopted an amendment to the State
Minimum Wage Act that raised the wages of 19,000 North
Carolina workers.
The General Assembly is still working on measures to improve
the unhappy lot of migratory farm workers— to assure safe trans-
portation and decent sanitary conditions for those workers.
We are beginning to open up the dead-end roads. The lot and
future of these people are major concerns of mine.
The General Assembly is still working on bills to abolish the
abuses of loan sharks who have given the lending business a bad
name. I expect a good bill will be passed.
Yes, the 1961 General Assembly has been a legislature with a
conscience.
Public Addresses and Summaries
141
Now let me speak for a minute on that most difficult of legisla-
tive problems: reapportionment and redistricting.
On this perennial problem I would point out that the 1961
General Assembly has made more progress than has been made
since 1941.
The General Assembly did reapportion the House of Repre-
sentatives.
The General Assembly did adopt an automatic reapportion-
ment act that I hope may set the pattern for speedy and equitable
reapportionment in future sessions.
It is true that the General Assembly has not found an agreeable
way to redistrict the seats of the State Senate. On the matter of
congressional redistricting, the General Assembly is now moving
toward enactment of a bill.
Some people are unhappy with that bill. Of course, there is
no way the General Assembly could possibly eliminate one
congressional district— as it must under the 1960 census— and make
everyone happy.
I will say this with all the force at my command: Anyone who
says the Senate-approved bill is unfair to the minority party must
have overlooked the fact that the county in which the minority
party has its greatest membership and the home county of the
minority party congressman would be included in the new district.
Gerrymandering is done by the Republican-controlled legislatures
in other states, and the proposed map has less of the gerrymander
than the present districts in North Carolina.
I can tell you the Democratic legislature of North Carolina is
a lot more considerate of the minority party than the Republican
legislatures are of Democratic congressional districts north of here.
The 1961 General Assembly adopted, and sent to the people
for approval in a state-wide constitutional vote, one of the best
court improvement programs of any state at any time.
The bill that was adopted was not all that its sponsors hoped
for. On the other hand, it went further than some of its opponents
would have liked. But this General Assembly worked in the best
tradition of democratic government and both sides deserve great
credit for the resulting bill which is a good bill and a vast
improvement.
If the people of the state approve the proposed amendment to
the Constitution, and I believe they will, our administration of
justice in North Carolina would be more expeditious, more
nearly exact, and more equitable.
On highway safety legislation, the 1961 General Assembly made
some marked advancements.
The Assembly extended the compulsory automobile liability
142
Papers of Terry Sanford
insurance act to protect the citizens of the state against un-
insured drivers.
The Assembly improved substantially the point system to slow
down habitual traffic violators.
The Assembly also increased the penalties for prearranged
racing. Other safety measures are awaiting action.
On reorganization of state government, the General Assembly
has adopted major administration proposals including enlarging
the membership of the State Highway Commission and bringing
it closer to the people. The Assembly also reorganized the Board
of Conservation and Development to assure that proper attention
will be given to all aspects of the conservation and development
program.
Road building is always a question of prime importance to the
citizens of North Carolina. It is especially important to those who
still live on muddy roads.
On the recommendation of the administration, this General
Assembly has established a major policy that will mean more
roads in both the secondary and primary systems.
That is the policy of halting the diversion of highway tax
money to non-highway uses.
The General Assembly is in the process of relieving the High-
way Fund of the cost of the Prison System and the cost of the
boards of Paroles and Probation. The Assembly also has tenta-
tively approved the bill to let the Highway Commission use
interest on Highway Fund money to build roads.
Under these three important and excellent measures, funds
have been made available to build roads that would not have
been available under the old system of diverting highway funds.
This is especially important when we consider that highway
revenues have not been keeping pace with General Fund increases.
In brief, under the three measures to halt diversion of Highway
Fund money, more rural roads will be built during the next two
years than could have been built under the old system.
Now I could talk for hours about other significant achievements
of the 1961 General Assembly.
But I'm not sure you would give me that much free time on
the radio and television stations.
Let me simply sum up my personal appraisal of the 1961
General Assembly this way:
I have neither seen in my lifetime nor read in my histories of
any General Assembly of the twentieth century that has rendered
greater service to the people of North Carolina.
I will always be proud to have served as the Governor w^ho
worked with the General Assembly of North Carolina of 1961.
Public Addresses and Summaries
143
YOUTH FITNESS COMMISSION
Raleigh
June 10, 1961
[About 200 people attended this conference, including more than 180
teen-agers representing 91 counties of North Carolina. After the address, in
which he called for a rededication of youth fitness in mental and spiritual
realms, as well as in the physical sense, Governor Sanford presented awards
to a boy and girl selected for their outstanding fitness.]
I appreciate the honor of meeting with you and of discussing
with you briefly our plans and our efforts to make North Carolina
physically, as well as fiscally, mentally, and spiritually stronger.
On behalf of all the citizens of our state, I want to thank each
of you for your unselfish and unpaid service to the state in this
vital field of physical fitness.
It has become a trite, but true, commentary on our times that
we parents of today hurry to drive our children to school so that
they won't be late for their physical education classes.
Youth fitness plays an important role in the current cold war
just as it did in the world wars and the Korean conflict. We all
pray that this cold war will never boil over into a hot war. But
we must be prepared collectively as a nation and individually as
citizens if it should.
The physical and mental fitness of the young people of the
nation is as great a deterrent to communism as the launching
pads at Canaveral.
Those Americans who enjoy amateur sports have been dismayed
in recent Olympic games to have the regimented Soviet teams
outscore us repeatedly. Year after year in the last decade, the
Australian tennis teams defeated the American teams in the Davis
Cup play-offs.
Now, I am not so concerned by the Soviets outscoring us in
the Olympics or the Australians winning the Davis Cup as I am
of the fact that these losses may well reflect a general softening
of the traditional American physical vigor.
Today, as never before, our way of life is being besieged from
every corner. There is not only the communist threat, but also
the many domestic obstacles that seem to multiply daily.
These challenges must be met, grappled with, and conquered.
They are like hurdles in a race which must be vaulted to reach
the finish line.
I have spent the greater part of the last two years talking about
and working for quality education for all the sons and daughters
of North Carolina. I have been speaking of quality education in
the broadest sense of those words: from the first grade through
144
Papers of Terry Sanford
the graduate school, and from physical education to physics.
I think it appropriate that a conference such as this one should
consider this quality education program. Because, I know, when
you speak of youth fitness you are not restricting yourselves to a
kind of vegetable care and growth for our children. If you were
interested in the physical side of fitness only, you probably would
be forced to the conclusion that the children of our state should
spend all their time on the gym floors or at the beaches.
What you're interested in and what I am interested in is the
fullest possible development of every boy and girl of this state.
That includes proper attention to physical education, and that
includes proper attention to the mental, social, and spiritual
education of every child.
In balancing the time allotments for each of these aspects of
growth, I want it clearly understood that I am not advocating
taking more time from the textbooks for interscholastic or inter-
collegiate sports. On the contrary! I believe we have cheated too
many students by permitting too many midweek out-of-town
games in the public schools.
It is just possible that the recent basketball scandals were bless-
ings in disguise, for they made us re-examine our whole inter-
collegiate and interscholastic programs.
There has been too much "spectating" and not enough partici-
pating by the vast majority of our high school and college students
in this field of sports.
On many occasions, I have pointed out that we must not rob
the classroom time for extracurricular activities. If we are to
build quality education programs that will develop the whole
personality of the child, we must give the teacher time to teach.
I believe the time has come to re-examine out-of-town games
in the middle of the school week. Studies must take first priority
if our state is to develop youth fitness in the true sense.
There is a strong interdependence between the intellect, the
morality, and the physique of the child.
We must not permit intellectual and mental stagnation. We
must not tolerate moral decay. And we must not condone physical
dissipation.
These three elements are inseparable. They are like the mathe-
matical equation: A equals B; B equals C; therefore, A equals
C. They represent the three corners of the equilateral triangle
which is the same regardless of which side is used as the base.
Intellectual brilliance can only be utilized when it is bound
together by fibers of moral strength and propelled by physical
vigor.
Moral depth comes only from knowledge that gives us apprecia-
Public Addresses and Summaries
145
tion of the rights of others and an intellectual and physical
stamina that allows us to stand up in the face of adversity.
None of these component parts of the total personality is
achieved easily. We cannot attain intellectual brilliance, moral
depth, or physical stamina just by wishing. It takes diligence and
practice— every day and every month and every year.
As I have said, physical fitness is an integral part of the develop-
ment of the child— and of the program for letting every boy and
every girl of North Carolina burgeon out the best that is within
him.
Recently, I had occcasion to speak to automobile liability
insurance company executives in New York City. We were
discussing highway safety for North Carolina. I told those insur-
ance executives that one way to help solve the traffic problem
would be for all of us to walk to work. I have tried to practice,
whenever my schedule permits, that preaching by walking to the
Capitol.
Besides cutting down on wrecks and frayed nerves of rush-hour
driving at the start of every day, such a practice would also cut
down the bulging waistlines of North Carolina.
North Carolina's rate of rejections by Selective Service has
been entirely too great. Many of those rejected were turned down
because of illiteracy. With our quality education program, North
Carolina is going to solve that problem.
I am counting on groups like this to help us solve the problem
of persons rejected for physical reasons. Because as well as the
large number rejected for illiteracy, there also was an unusually
large number of persons in our state rejected for physical reasons.
Now I realize no physical fitness program can make the blind
see or the deaf hear. But we can certainly trim down the incidence
of heart disease due to overweight, and we can certainly curtail
other preventable physical deficiencies.
If North Carolina is to swim in the mainstream of American
life, every man, woman, and child must recognize the need for
individual strength— mental strength, moral strength, and physical
strength.
I shall look forward to working with you to build a stronger
North Carolina by building stronger North Carolinians.
146
Papers of Terry Sanford
ANNUAL CONFERENCE
TEACHERS OF VOCATIONAL AGRICULTURE
Greensboro
July 13, 1961
Governor Sanford told the vocational agriculture teachers that
they occupied key positions, but they would have to realize the
importance of inevitable change. He said it was man's nature to
go forward, though change might create hardship and problems.
He proceeded to discuss his program for improvements in the
educational system of the state, including a review of legislation
adopted by the 1961 General Assembly. He explained that intel-
ligent action and a real spirit of enthusiasm would be needed on
the part of farming interests. Sanford expressed the opinion that
the teachers at this meeting had accepted the responsibility facing
them, that the attitude of the group was one of confidence, and
that confidence was a force which would overcome any obstacle,
achieve any goal.
DEDICATION OF
FEDERAL HOUSING ADMINISTRATION OFFICE
Greensboro
July 13, 1961
The dedication of the Federal Housing Administration's new
office marked the twenty-sixth year of business headquarters in
Greensboro and afforded Governor Sanford another opportunity
to praise the co-operative partnership between government and
free enterprise. An organization synonymous with sound fiscal
policies, intelligent planning, efficient management, and con-
structive policies, the FHA had helped house America since
1934, with no cost to taxpayers. Governor Sanford attributed the
enactment of the Housing Act of 1961 partially to the success of
the FHA program. The new act would help government and
private citizens "to get on with the job of razing the slums and of
raising new homes. ..." The Governor pointed out the benefits
to be derived by North Carolina citizens— the poorer group, the
elderly, and the students— from the legislation. He pledged the
support of his administration to work with the FHA and private
enterprise in taking full advantage of the provisions of the new
act. He concluded with the statement that good housing helped
Public Addresses and Summaries 147
"make a stronger neighborhood, a stronger community, a stronger
state and a stronger nation."
DEDICATION OF BENSON NATIONAL GUARD ARMORY
Benson
July 16, 1961
[Governor Sanford, participating in the dedication of a new National
Guard Armory at Benson, spoke meaningfully of America's desire for peace
but willingness to fight to preserve freedom. He reiterated his belief in the
desires and goals of Americans to foster both peace and freedom throughout
the world in this talk and in a number of other speeches delivered during
his administration.]
I appreciate the honor you have extended to me in inviting me
to participate in the dedication of this new National Guard
Armory. This armory will serve as an integral part in the Table
of Organization and Equipment of our national defense effort.
And the men who train in this armory will march as part of the
American army of freedom. The men who will train here will be
primarily citizen-soldiers. They will be the kind of citizen-soldiers
who answered that first call to rally around the flag of freedom
at Bunker Hill. They will march in the footsteps of the citizen-
soldiers who fought and won under Andy Jackson at New Orleans
a century and a half ago. They will also march in the footsteps
of the citizen-soldiers who answered Woodrow Wilson's call and
fought under "Black Jack" Pershing "to make the world safe for
democracy."
I know the men who train here will be faithful to our heritage
of freedom just as their older brothers were faithful to that
heritage in Bataan, at Bastogne, at Guadalcanal and Iwo Jima.
Our nation has never had a Junker military caste like Bismarck
and the Kaiser and Hitler had to call on. And as long as Americans
are willing to leave their civilian jobs to defend freedom, we never
will! Americans do not march just to hear hobnail boots striking
the ground. We are a nation that would rather hear the beat of
rock'n'roll than the beat of Wagner's militaristic music.
The order of the day in America is peace— not war. The uniform
of the day is the overall of the farmer or the Ivy League suit of
the salesman or the dungarees of the factory worker— not battle
dress of militarists. Our chow lines are at a civilian hot dog stand
or a Dairy Queen— not at military messes. But let no dictator
misinterpret this traditional love of peaceful pursuit. Civilian-
148
Papers of Terry Sanford
soldiers have proved since 1776 that they will fight if fight they
must!
The dictators in the Kremlin and the dictators in Peiping
should take a long hard look at the history of America before they
start anything. The American eating peanuts at the ball park
will sacrifice that bag of peanuts for a can of C-rations if he must.
And the American civilian will exchange his golfing putter for
an M-1 if it is necessary to do so to safeguard freedom here and
elsewhere.
This armory that we are dedicating here today is symbolic of
the fact that while Americans prefer peaceful pursuit, they are
willing to take up arms to protect their right, and the right of
their families, to freedom. In short, we are willing to work for
peace, but we are also willing to fight for freedom.
President Kennedy has demonstrated to the Soviets and to the
world that America does not fear to negotiate. But he also has
said, and he has shown, that we will never negotiate out of fear.
President Kennedy is willing to go to Vienna— to negotiate.
But Jack Kennedy will never go to Munich— to appease.
If Nikita Khrushchev is as smart a man as he is supposed to be,
he must know that a man like Jack Kennedy who fought to
defend this nation against Tito and Hitler will also fight to defend
the free world against imperialistic communism.
All Americans who sweated in the jungles of the Pacific and
shivered in the mud of Italy and froze in the snows around
Bastogne pray in their hearts that we will never again have to
sweat and freeze and bleed and die just to prove to a dictator that
we are willing to do so to preserve democracy.
We pray that the Communists, who profess to base their beliefs
on historical dialectics, will read in their histories the unmis-
takable lesson that has been written in blood: the lesson that
Americans will fight though they prefer peace; the lesson that
Americans will negotiate, but will never surrender; the lesson
that the assembly lines which turn out the consumer goods which
we enjoy also can turn out tanks and planes and rockets.
It is because dictators sometimes misinterpret the American
mood that we need armories like this one. It is because dictators
sometimes overlook the hard lesson of history that it is necessary
for civilian-soldiers to learn to handle weapons in this armory.
I was happy to see the report issued recently by North Caro-
lina's Adjutant General, Claude Bowers. General Bowers ap-
praised the state of readiness of the North Carolina National
Guard as the best in his memory. And as you old soldiers and you
veterans know, General Bowers' memory of the Guard goes back
to World War I. It is reassuring to have a man like General
Public Addresses and Summaries
149
Bowers leading the civilian-soldiers of North Carolina. It is reas-
suring to have men like Colonel Ivan Hardesty^^ and their fellow
officers here at Benson and across the state in command of our
civilian-army corps in North Carolina. It also is reassuring to
have the excellent cadre of noncommissioned officers that the
North Carolina National Guard has.
And as a man who served his time as a private, I will say to
the beginners in the Guard: An army couldn't exist without you
—for as you know, the buck stops with you, and you do most of
the work.
The civilian-soldiers of North Carolina and the civilian-soldiers
of the other forty-nine states are ready to mobilize— if mobilization
is ordered by the President.
General Bowers has noted that the civilian-soldier "has always
fought well" and that the strength of the civilian-soldier is in
being able to make do with what he has.
Marching alongside of the RA's in a half dozen wars, the
civilian-soldiers of North Carolina have never failed in their
mission, their mission to defend freedom.
We have, in recent days, reached one of those crises in history
when the fate of the free world hangs in the balance. At this very
hour, the fate of Berlin hangs precariously. And the fate of
Berlin is just as important to all the free world in the summer
of 1961 as was the fate of the Polish Corridor in the summer of
1939.
I wish Nikita Khrushchev could have been here today and seen
the demonstration of America's willingness to fight if he forces
us into a fight. I would hope that Pravda and Isvestia and Red
Star J the main newspapers of the Soviet Union, might mention
this dedication somewhere in their news columns tomorrow
morning. For this dedication is a striking example that America
is ready to answer the call of President Kennedy if that call to
arms is forthcoming.
We are prepared and we will fight to save Berlin and to safe-
guard the free world.
I, therefore, am happy to dedicate this building as a citadel to
the defense of the liberties of America— and to the defense of
liberty throughout the world.
^ Ivan Hardesty, Assistant Chief Engineer of Highway Department from Raleigh,
career National Guardsman since 1926; promoted from colonel to brigadier gen-
eral. May, 1962. Governor Sanford's news release of May 29, 1962.
150
Papers of Terry Sanford
SOUTH CAROLINA EDUCATION WEEK CONFERENCE
Columbia, South Carolina
July 18, 1961
[An early morning flight enabled Governor Sanford to leave Raleigh and
arrive in Columbia in time to address the South Carolina Education Week
Conference. The conference was made up of representatives of the School
of Education of the University of South Carolina, the South Carolina Asso-
ciation of School Administrators, the South Carolina Association of School
Boards, and the Congress of Parents and Teachers. He urged the South to
move forward in the field of education and was critical of areas in which
the region was backward. His address was not, however, without the charac-
teristic Sanford optimism.]
The South is rising again! It is not rising again through
secession from the union, nor through insurrection, nor through
nullification. It is rising again through education, through
industry, through commerce, and through agriculture.
It is rising through the exercise of its long-neglected literary
talents, through its research in the scholarly fields and in the
applied sciences. It is rising to heights that will make the great
accomplishments of the "Old South" pale by comparison.
The South is moving again into the mainstream of American
life.
Now that it is moving, the South deserves a chance to work
out its future without free advice from people who neglect their
own problems in order to give ill-informed attention to ours.
It is doubtful that we will have it. The issues are too alive, too
complex, too pressing, and too emotional.
The South has been on the defensive too long. The defensive
position is not conducive to positive thought and action. But
positive thought and action are what we must have today in the
South and in the nation. We must and we intend to move out of
the defensive. If there is to be a New South, it must have a new
policy— a policy consistent with the national conscience, to be
sure, but a policy which also will preserve that which is best of
the South's distinctive culture and enable it to realize its highest
potential for good. We can move from the defensive to national
leadership, and this we must do because the very future of the
nation depends on what we are able to accomplish.
What should the new southern policy be? To the extent that
education is basic to the achievement of our national goals, and
nothing is more basic to it, education must be the foundation
of progress in the South. The issue must not be whether there
will be education. The issue must be whether the education that
Public Addresses and Summaries
151
is available is appropriate, of excellent quality, and adequately
supported.
North Carolina has settled the question. It does not intend to
turn back. We have faced the bleak alternatives to better schools,
and we have chosen to expand and improve our schools.
The clarion call for better schools has replaced the rebel yell
as the voice of the South, and it deserves the attention of a
national audience which usually is only too willing to hear the
opposite. Education across the nation is crying for direction and
leadership. Well, let's lead.
North Carolina is on the move as is South Carolina and, indeed,
the entire South. It is backing up its promises with money in
unprecedented amounts.
The General Assembly of North Carolina recently appropriated
over $100 million in enrichment funds for public education.
The General Assembly of North Carolina has met the challenge
of the times by that action. The South Carolina legislature, I am
told, also has moved to meet that challenge. We cannot do the
job that needs doing in education without money provided by
those legislatures.
But money, whether it is provided by the city council, the
legislature, or the Congress, cannot do the job alone.
As James Bryant Conant put it: "The road to better schools
will be paved by the collective action of the local citizenry. The
responsibility for the sorely needed upgrading of our schools
cannot be passed to the state legislatures or to Congress. The
responsibility rests on every citizen in the land."
But though the support must come from the people and their
elected representatives, the educating must come from the
teachers. You educators must not fail, for all else depends on you
as we seek our regional and national goals.
I would hope that those in education, self-assured in their own
competency, would leave their minds wide open for all criticism
and new ideas. Those who are motivated to sharp criticism of
existing institutions from their own sincere concern make a
valuable contribution to the advancement of our society.
Now is the time for fresh approaches, bold action, tearing away
from any tinge of self-satisfaction, an appreciative willingness to
give all thoughts and suggestions a fair audience.
I have noted in some of my friends and associates in the field
of education, a group in which I count myself to be a member,
a tendency to be oversensitive. Criticism of the school system
too often evokes criticism of the person making the criticism.
I welcome all ideas, thoughts, suggestions, criticism— even harsh
and blunt criticism. I do not pretend to take all advice, but I
152
Papers of Terry Sanford
do try to listen and weigh and profit by all advice which comes
my way.
A case in point is Admiral Hyman C. Rickover. Here a distin-
guished scientist, a patriot o£ the highest order, a man moved by
an overriding concern for the future of democracy is suspected
of being against the school system because he is harsh in his
criticism. I will admit that I suspect he occasionally deliberately
overstates his case, takes an unusually blunt stance, slaps harder
than is needed, in order to shock us to attention. This is his
method, but not his purpose, and we might in candor concede
that his method is justified by our laxness in many areas.
I say those of us charged with the future of education in a
democracy can take criticism and that we will expect and
welcome it. In this way we will profit, and democracy will profit
and survive.
I would not follow all the suggestions of Admiral Rickover,
and perhaps not any of them exactly, but I use him as an example
because the reaction to his prodding has been extreme.
For example, consider these statements of Rickover:
We are now confronted with clear-cut evidence that in the all-important
field of education our true competitive position against other certain ad-
vanced nations is unsatisfactory. The wall behind which we have been
nursing the illusion that "our schools are the best in the world" is being
rudely pulled down and we must face up to the truth, remedy our educa-
tional errors and do a great deal better by our children.
There is no answer in this statement, but there is much truth,
and we will do well to look back over our shoulders to see indeed
that our adversaries are gaining on us.
Continuing to quote:
The enormous wealth [of America has been] a mighty prop to self-esteem.
. . . Thus protected against the harsh facts of life, it is easy to imagine
oneself superior, not just in wealth but in other things as well. This is a
pleasant illusion, but it may have consequences not even the richest can
afford.
Here, perhaps, is a key to the reason the youth is in a better
position to move into national leadership. We have had less
reason to become haughty and vain, and we know we have a job
to do in building our opportunities.
And again:
. . . not even so rich a people as we can afford underpaid and under-
educated teachers, absence of academic standards, and a philosophy of fun
and games at school. . . .
Now don't jump at conclusions by saying to yourself we can't
have inflexible national standards. Maybe we can't, but put your
Public Addresses and Summaries
153
mind to working on how we can have academic standards which
afford goals and measure achievement. That is the way to put
blunt criticism to work running in your favor.
And don't get miffed when I quote "fun and games" by think-
ing, "well, we certainly don't have that in our schools." Maybe
you don't, but too many do, and we are all too lax in too many
ways.
I am saying to educators let's be our own harshest critics. Let's
seek out our shortcomings, look for ways of improvement, and
get on with the job.
Take the four things I have just mentioned: underpaid teachers,
undereducated teachers, absence of academic standards, "fun and
games."
Teachers are underpaid. I am responsible for that, and all
citizens are responsible. I said across my state that this was
problem number one. The people agreed, the General Assembly
agreed, and we are moving to higher pay.
Many people have asked: "How will paying a teacher more
convert her into a better teacher than she was last year?" The
answer is twofold. We have to start paying more before we start
attracting an adequate number of qualified people. This is no
chicken or egg dilemma. Higher pay must come first.
The other answer is immediate. Higher pay demonstrates that
we have confidence in our teachers, that we understand the
priority of education, and that we believe in upgrading its
importance. This leads to improved morale and a terrific chal-
lenge, and every teacher worth his salt immediately starts trying
to do a better job.
When I speak of undereducated teachers, I am not restricting
myself to the teachers in the classrooms who hold something less
than "A" certificates. I am speaking also of those teachers who
have taken an overdose of courses of how to teach and who have
had far too few courses of what to teach.
It is time that our schools of education bring the courses on
subject matter into balance with the courses on teaching methods.
I think there would be no argument from this audience if I
observe that in the field of academic standards an "A" on
arithmetic in one school, or in one county, does not equal an
"A" on the same subject in another school or in another county.
The results of entrance examinations for college freshmen prove
the inequality of academic standards of various schools and
various counties and various states.
We might sum up the problem of the overemphasis on "fun and
games" this way: It is true that all work and no play makes
Johnnie a dull boy. But all play and no work at school will make
154
Papers of Terry Sanford
Johnnie an ignorant boy. And it will make him a poor boy when
he goes out into the world to compete for a job.
Carolinians have always understood that education is the means
by which our states must reach their full potential growth in both
economic and human values. At the turn of the century, Walter
Hines Page made the following statement of faith:
I believe in the free public training of both the hands and the mind of
every child born of woman.
I believe that by the right training of men we add to the wealth of the
world. All wealth is the creation of man, and he creates it only in proportion
to the trained uses of the community; and, the more men we train, the more
wealth everyone may create.
I believe in the perpetual regeneration of society, in the immortality of
democracy, and in growth everlasting.®"
We have had our successes and we have made progress and
we have a remarkable record considering that we suffered many
years of struggle against the oppressive tactics of vindictive victors
as an aftermath of the Civil War. But whatever our successes, it
is not enough for the rapidly advancing scientific, changing world
we now enter.
The job is not finished. What we have really done is to
create new and unlimited opportunities.
The late Dr. Howard Odum of the University of North Caro-
lina, and a native of Georgia, showed clearly that the South need
not continue to be known as the "nation's economic problem
number one." While we do not have everything, he pointed out,
we do have in abundance those resources that really matter-
soil, water, climate, rainfall, and people— most of all we have a
stock of sturdy and able people. We only need to develop fully
this human resource. That again justifies our reliance on educa-
tion as the path to all other objectives.
Quality education is no mean goal! For all other goals we
seek for the South can be measured by the quality, the scope, the
reach of our educational efforts.
Education is the foundation of economic improvement. We in
the South are concerned, vitally, with industrial development,
farm income, the economic growth, the chance of all to make a
better living; and because of this we must give top priority to
education.
Education is the foundation of democracy. We are concerned
with defending the principles of freedom, of individual liberties,
of free enterprise, of equality and dignity of man; and therefore,
we seek the fulfillment of these principles through quality educa-
tion we offer our boys and girls.
Page, Rebuilding of Old Commonwealths, 102.
Public Addresses and Summaries
155
Education is the foundation of the needs and hopes of the
nation. We are concerned with our part in the world, and we
are concerned with the peace of the world, and therefore, we must
adequately educate the scientists, the statesmen, and the citizenry
who will fully understand and are equipped to defend and
promote the ideals of our dynamic democracy of the twentieth
century.
Education, put in the bleakest terms, is survival. Here in our
own small part of the free world, we can do no less than seek the
best as we prepare to do our part to defend America and the free
world.
And education, put in its brightest terms, is life and growth,
and happiness. We are not here merely to make a living. We are
talking about the fundamental when we are talking about educa-
tion, and our goal is worthy of the best we have in mind, and
heart, and spirit.
The training the teachers are giving in the classrooms is
ultimately going to be more important than the training beir^
given on the parade fields of Fort Jackson and Fort Bragg— and
I am not minimizing the importance of the army posts.
How well the students perform is going to have a greater effect
on history than how well a missile performs at Cape Canaveral.
The South must improve its schools if it expects to improve its
economy.
Yet despite this, we have for too long in the South expected
our teachers to work for apples and yearbook dedications.
North and South Carolina are properly concerned when anyone
attempts to cut our tobacco parity below 90 per cent. Yet we
have been giving our sons and daughters something less than
66 per cent of the national educational parity.
The South, like the rest of the nation, needs to take a long,
hard look at itself to see where it stands now, and to see where
it hopes to stand and where it will stand twenty years from now.
Our public school system is southern, and we have no desire
to make it northern or anything other than southern. But that
does not require us to be provincial in our efforts to prepare our
children to take part in life. We have been forced, by the sheer
impact of the change taking place in this modern day America,
to place our children in competition with children from every
section of the country.
The present day businessman cannot rely on competition solely
from his own county or even his own state. Products from all
over America, and indeed all over the world, flow in daily to
compete against the products he is selling here in this state. If he
156
Papers of Terry Sanford
is a manufacturer, he can rest assured that a new industry from
outside the South will soon come in, and he will have to meet
the new demands for labor and other resources.
If the child is setting out to become a lawyer, he can no longer
plan to make a living on criminal cases and a few civil actions
in the JP courts. He may be practicing in what we think of as
a one-horse town, but he still must match wits with bonding
attorneys from Wall Street, tax attorneys trained by the federal
government, and corporation lawyers sent out by General Motors
and Standard Oil. The attorney today competes with these experts,
and beats them from time to time, or he must give up any hope
of a successful career.
Even to get into a medical school today, a student must match
his wits against those who come from all over the country to get
the relatively few openings in our crowded medical schools. In
practice, the doctor must make use of the most complex medicines
and methods of modern science.
In all of these areas, the child from the South can no longer
think in terms of how good he is in his own community; he must
be competent to equal those all across the nation. We may still
revel in the stories of the Old South, but when it comes down
to the hard, everyday problem of making a living, there just
aren't many of us picking cotton anymore. And the public school
system which is geared to those times will do our children the
greatest disservice in preparing them for a race they can never
win, a life they can never live to its fullest.
The South, like the rest of the nation, needs to ask itself again
the questions which Edwin Markham angrily asked:
Is this the thing the Lord God made and gave
To have dominion over sea and land. . . ?
How will you ever straighten up this shape;
Touch it again with immortality:
Give back the upward looking and the light;
Rebuild in it the music and the dream?
Through education! That is how. Education will straighten up
this shape, touch it again with immortality, give it back the
upward looking and the light. But education that is designed
for the few, the rich and the privileged will not do it. Education
that does not take him into account, or rejects him if it notices
him at all, will never straighten up this shape or heal his im-
medicable woes.
Great southerners have long recognized this truth. Thomas
Jefferson knew that an educated citizenry is a necessary pre-
Edwin Markham, The Man With the Hoe and Other Poems (New York:
Doubleday, Page and Company, 1922) , 16-17.
Public Addresses and Summaries
157
requisite to free government. Woodrow Wilson, another souther-
ner, knew that universal education is a necessary prerequisite to
making the world safe for democracy.
But this is not the only area of educational need. The South,
like the rest of the nation, needs also to look at the other end
of the educational system— the colleges and the universities.
Only three of the thirteen southern states rank above the
national average in the percentage of their adult population with
four or more years of college education. North Carolina is not
among them. It is thirty-ninth among the fifty states. South
Carolina ranks higher, but not high enough to boast. Your state
is thirty-second among the fifty states.
I do not minimize the need for more money in higher educa-
tion, either public or private. More money must be provided—
substantially more money. But the South will not keep faith with
the future if we do not take into account the tremendous backlog
of educational demand that exists on the part of honest, hard-
working people who simply do not have the price. It is a reality
we must face. It is a reality the South must take into account as
it shapes a new college policy for the future.
Universal quality education will provide the cornerstone for a
prosperous New South— a South that can again lead the nation.
The place to begin is with the beginning: in the public schools.
Here we must reappraise our curriculum. North Carolina is
seeking a new curriculum, a curriculum with power— "power in
itself to challenge the latent germ of genius, great or small,
classical or modern, academic or technical, that every educable
human being has within him in some degree." It is only in the
light of this curriculum study that we are investing another
$100 million toward the achievement of this goal. We await
results with hope and with confidence, but meanwhile we work.
This, however, is not enough for the foundation. The key to
quality education is quality teaching. And one of the keys to
quality teaching is quality teacher education, both pre -service
and in-service teacher education. It must be said to the credit of
professional education in North Carolina and South Carolina
that it, too, is taking a positive stand for progress. There can
be no doubt that the leadership now being exerted by the
profession will bring new quality, of rich meaning, to the
instruction in tens of thousands of classrooms in the state.
The junior colleges and the church-supported colleges must
play important roles in the higher education of our states. How
else shall we face the doubling of college enrollments certainly
within the next decade? How else will we be able to reach the
158
Papers of Terry Sanford
young men and women who simply do not have the price of a
residential college education?
The need for industrial, or the so-called terminal-technical
education is increasing. At the present time a survey of every job
opportunity in North Carolina is being made, and this survey will
lead to complete, accurate descriptions of the requirements of each
of these thousands of jobs. On the basis of this survey, curricular
standards will be set up and state-wide courses of instruction
leading to certification of technicians will be established. These
will form the curriculum of North Carolina's new system of
industrial education centers, which, although begun only in
1958, are now reaching over 15,000 adults.
I am informed that South Carolina is moving quickly in this
field of industrial education.
At the head of our educational system, and carrying the
heaviest responsibility for its leadership are our senior colleges
and universities with their graduate schools and various profes-
sional programs. These institutions serve as the brain centers, as
sources of ideas and plans for much of our life. The specialized
leaders who come from these institutions become the trusted
leaders in many fields, and the standard they set is determined in
a large part by the standard to which they have been challenged
by those institutions. As we support these institutions to the
best possible performance, we insure that our leadership will
have the opportunity to develop to its fullest.
Quality education which we seek cannot be delivered by a city
council, or a legislature, or the Congress, although their help is
essential in starting the march. Quality education is complex,
difficult, constant in required attention, and it will demand the
best in effort by school boards, the state agencies, the superintend-
ents, the principals, the teachers, the parents, the students, and
indeed all the citizens of this university, this city, this state, and
this nation.
The hour is at hand when South Carolina, North Carolina, and
all the South can rise again and march again. We will make this
march not with bayonets but with textbooks. We will not be
firing on Fort Sumter. We will be firing on the dungeons of
ignorance.
We will make this march by reaching out and grasping the
hands of our most priceless possession, our children and our
grandchildren.
Thank you.
Public Addresses and Summaries
159
STATE 4 H CLUB WEEK MEETING
Raleigh
July 26, 1961
[Some 1,400 members of the 4-H Clubs of North Carolina met in Raleigh
for their annual convention. Discussions, dress revues, contests, and elec-
tions filled the days, but the highlight of the week was the address by Gov-
ernor Sanford. Speaking at William Neal Reynolds Coliseum, the Governor
discussed the influence of farming on the international scene and then
launched into an analysis of the farm situation and opportunities in North
Carolina.]
Each of you sitting here today is living testimony to something
that I have been saying across our state for years: Farming is
NOT dead in North Carolina. In fact, this remarkable audience
and this remarkable demonstration of the work of 1,400 young
farm leaders is proof positive that there is new hope, new vigor,
and new promise for profitable harvests on North Carolina's
farms.
There is, indeed, a new day in North Carolina agriculture!
I grew up in the farm trading town of Laurinburg, although it
has grown to three times the size and the designation of "All
American City" since I left and I know something of the work
involved in your activities. I know the toil and sweat that go
into suckering tobacco. And I also know the rich sense of personal
satisfaction, as well as the enrichment of the pocketbook, that
comes at the end of a good season.
Then I know too what the work that you and your parents
are doing this summer means to the economy of a town like
Laurinburg, and cities like Durham and Winston-Salem and
Raleigh, and even that metropolis of Charlotte.
If you have a bad year on the farm, the urban people have a
bad year in town. The merchant's sales drop. The banker's
deposits fall off. The manufacturer's orders go down.
When the farmer prospers, we know there are going to be good
profits in town. But when the farmer suffers, we all are going to
suffer.
This is especially true in North Carolina, a state that has more
family-sized farms than any state in the union except Texas.
We know of the close correlation between the prosperity on
the farm and the prosperity of the town. We learned that lesson
before any one of you 4-H Club members here today was born.
We learned it the hard way. There was a farm depression in the
early 1920's. Those were the Roaring Twenties in the big cities
so very few people in town worried very much about the plight
of the farmer out in the country.
160
Papers of Terry Sanford
But we found out in 1929 that the farm economy plays an
integral role in the over-all national economy.
The farm depression of the early twenties caught up with the
cities in the fall of 1929. If you've studied your history of that
period, you know that mighty Wall Street did something then
that generally has been left to the inhabitants of the barnyard.
It laid an egg.
We had to relearn this lesson the hard way again in the 1950's.
These were the years you here today will remember. You know
that we had some officials in Washington who thought the solution
to the farm problem was to shut down the small farms.
You know what happened. We first had a farm recession. Then
we had a national recession. In fact we had a couple of them.
Now, we are in the happy position of having an administration
in Washington under the capable leadership of President Jack
Kennedy, who fully appreciates the importance of keeping our
farm programs strong.
As you know, President Kennedy and Secretary of Agriculture
Orville Freeman have relied heavily on North Carolina and
North Carolinians in maintaining and developing the agricultural
resources on our New Frontier.
Three of the major policy makers in Secretary Freeman's
department are North Carolinians: Charles Murphy from Wallace
is Under Secretary of Agriculture; Harry B. Caldwell of Greens-
boro is chairman of the President's Farm Advisory Committee;
and Horace Godfrey is administrator of the Commodity Credit
Corporation. They are working, as are the President and Secretary
Freeman, with Congressman Harold Cooley, the veteran chairman
of the House Agriculture Committee, and with Senator B. Everett
Jordan,^2 ^ member of the Senate Agriculture Committee.
(Parenthetically, I would like to say that Senator Jordan's com-
mittee's recent vote on the farm bill was not fully understood.
In the complicated legislative process, which is hard to under-
stand, he was working for the kind of farm bill which would best
serve North Carolina. If you will watch with patience you will
see my prediction come true that Senator Jordan will play an
important role in helping the farm situation in our state and
nation.)
This position in national leadership is important to a state like
ours that still is primarily an agricultural state. And this effort
to reinvigorate the farm economy is vital to the nation.
It is vital because, as we have seen, the nation's domestic
^B. Everett Jordan (1896- ), businessman from Saxapahaw; political and
civic leader; successor in United States Senate to W. Kerr Scott, who died in 1958.
North Carolina Manual, 1963, 501-502.
Public Addresses and Summaries
161
economy is as strongly tied to the agricultural economy as it is
to the steel or the automotive industries.
It is vital to the United States in our foreign policy.
One of America's secret weapons in this cold war with com-
munism is our agriculture.
True, you don't kill a man with an ear of corn or a bag of
peanuts. You use rifles and hand grenades and bombs and missiles
for killing. But it is equally true that with the food we raise here
in North Carolina you can keep a man from dying.
In this crisis over Berlin, our surplus food is as important to
the defense of the free world as our stockpile of atom bombs.
I'm sure you've read the Biblical story of the seven years of
feast that were followed by the seven years of famine. Young
Joseph may well have been a 4-H Club member had he lived
today. For he had the good sense to conserve— to store the surpluses
of ancient Egypt against the time of drought and hunger.
There is a more modern example of this object lesson.
I wonder how many of you noticed the story in the Sunday
newspapers by Ovid Martin, the Associated Press farm editor.
Martin pointed out that "The Berlin crisis and the possibility
that it might develop into a shooting war has put this nation's
farm surpluses and its excessive agricultural productive capacity
in a new light."
He went on to point out that when World War II broke out,
the United States was struggling with overproduction and excess
supplies.
It didn't take long to exhaust our surpluses in that war.
And, should we have to fight over Berlin, or any of the other
danger spots around the globe, it would not take long to exhaust
all our farm surpluses.
In fact, the only farm surplus that we now have which is large
enough to make our defense leaders feel easy is the wheat stock-
pile. And that wouldn't last but twenty-five months. It wouldn't
last that long if we helped to supply our allies— as we did in the
last war and as we certainly would be expected to do in any future
war.
Our surpluses of corn would last only six months under war-
time conditions. Our surpluses of tobacco, cotton, butter, dry
milk, dry beans, rice, peanuts, oats, barley, cheese, rye, flaxseed,
and soybeans would hardly last until the next year's crops were in.
You young members of the 4-H Clubs here today may not
remember the food rationing of World War II. But all of you
adult leaders do.
I hope and I pray that we will never have to use our farm
surpluses for wartime purposes. As a former GI, I can tell you
162
Papers of Terry Sanford
that those canned K and C rations never tasted half as good as
fresh vegetables and fresh milk and fresh fruits and fresh meats
from the farms of North Carolina.
But it is important for all Americans, including those who
moan about full storage bins, to bear in mind the vital role farm
surpluses play in winning wars.
The Soviet Union may be running neck and neck in the missile
race. But they're not even within hog-calling distance of the
United States in farm production.
The Communists of Russia and the Communists of China have
tried to catch up. But their collective farms have been a miserable
failure in comparison with our privately owned farms operated
by free farmers.
Incidentally, I would again refer you to your history books and
the great role farmers around the globe have played in the
defense of freedom against communism. Whenever communism
has encroached or attempted to encroach on free men, the farmers
have been frontline fighters against it. The Kulaks in Russia
fought it and Stalin had to exterminate them before he could
get on with his communization and his collective farms. Many
thousands, and probably millions, of Chinese farmers have resisted
the nationalization of their lands, their homes, their lives.
The farmers in Poland were among the first to help slow down
communism of that once free land.
Farmers the world over will fight communism, when they
know what it really is, as hard as they fought serfdom.
So we can see that farmers as well as farm surpluses are mighty
weapons in the arsenal of democracy.
This state, as one of America's great agricultural states, and
America as the greatest agricultural nation in the world, must go
on the offensive.
You young ladies already know that the way to a man's heart
is through his stomach.
Both you young ladies and you young men should also know
that the way to a man's mind also is often routed through his
stomach. You don't find many of the people in the emerging new
nations who are turning to communism on a full stomach.
But, by the same token, you don't find many starving people
worrying about political theories of democracy or communism on
empty bellies.
Here is where free America can and must go on the offensive.
We can use our farm surpluses to feed a hungry world. And
we should do so not merely to win over the uncommitted
nations— which is, of course, reason enough itself. But we should
Public Addresses and Summaries
163
divide our farm surpluses with a hungry world because it is
morally the right thing to do.
It has been truthfully said that our farm surpluses are
America's blessing, not a national burden. We should share
this blessing with the underfed around the world.
Now I've been discussing with you the importance of farmers
and farming in the international situation. But what about down
home on the farm in North Carolina?
You young farm leaders of North Carolina know better than
most what is right— as well as what is wrong— with the farms of
North Carolina.
You know that it's time to be planting and growing in North
Carolina, not for plowing-under our farms.
To this end, the agricultural leaders of North Carolina,
including your own 4-H Club adult leaders, met with me recently
and put forward North Carolina's new agricultural opportunities
program.
Objectives of the program are to lift the farm income, to
develop marketing and processing facilities and services, and to
promote education for family and community development.
A blueprint for accomplishing these objectives was prepared
by the North Carolina Board of Farm Organizations and Agri-
cultural Agencies. The program calls for tackling farm income
and marketing problems on the basis of "economic areas" rather
than on the basis of county or community enterprises alone.
True, the farm economy of North Carolina, like the farm
economy of the nation, has suffered its ills. But we have made
significant gains in farm income in the past few years despite the
downward trend over the nation at large.
We are neither going to plow under our family farms nor our
farmers. We are not going to run them off the farms and into
cities where there already is too much unemployment.
Instead, we are going to work for new agricultural opportunities
through every available resource at our disposal.
The time has come to do some pruning of outdated farming
and marketing practices and ideas. We have been doing a fairly
good job in the past, but we are not reaping anything like our
potential. We need to revitalize our farm programs with greater
emphasis on agriculture as one of the cornerstones of our economy.
North Carolina is not getting out of the farming business. We
can't afford to. Six out of every ten persons in North Carolina
live in rural areas. The total agricultural business is worth $3.5
billion a year to North Carolina. What's more. North Carolina
has over 190,000 farms.
I believe there are certain areas where more emphasis needs
164
Papers of Terry Sanford
to be placed and where the Governor's Office can work effectively
with the Commissioner of Agriculture, State College, and other
farm agencies and organizations.
1. The Governor and the Highway Commission can see that
proper consideration be given to rural roads. I recommended and
the General Assembly adopted a far-reaching program to stop
highway fund diversion so that millions of dollars can be freed
to work on rural roads.
2. The Governor's Office and the Department of Conservation
and Development are already working day and night to encourage
the establishment of more farm-related plants in North Carolina.
We have made good progress in this field already.
Since January, I have had the pleasure of helping to announce
a new strawberry packing plant in southeastern North Carolina,
a new sweet potato drying and packaging plant in northeastern
North Carolina.
Next month, I will help dedicate an important new feed mill
at Wilson.
You and I know that such plants serve the double purpose of
providing new markets for farm commodities and new job
opportunities for farm families.
3. The state can and is promoting to the fullest the great
export market possibilities. To this end I have recommended and
the General Assembly has approved and sent to the people a
program to expand the deep water ports of North Carolina.
Through these ports we are developing ways to ship our crops
to the four comers of the world.
4. The Governor can and will give top priority to promote
"agricultural opportunities" at banking conventions, county
fairs, industrial meetings, farm conventions, and other meetings
from Tryon to Chinquapin. This is a program which has meaning
for every family living in rural North Carolina. And because
of that, it has a meaning for every citizen of the state.
For example, North Carolina grows only a quarter of a million
dollars worth of aromatic tobacco a year. Yet the tobacco manu-
facturers of North Carolina buy $90 million worth every year.
North Carolina farmers are furnishing less than half the hogs
that the new meat processing plant at Wilson needs and is ready
to buy. That plant imports the rest from the Midwest, but we
can grow hogs as profitably within North Carolina as any state
in the union.
We can grow economically and profitably more fruits and
vegetables, more cattle, and can grow the feed to support an
expanded livestock industry.
5. The Governor's Office, working with the farm agencies and
Public Addresses and Summaries
165
organizations and with other economic development groups and
agencies, can serve as the focal point for all the programs and
unify them into one great effort to move North Carolina's agri-
culture forward.
We have the resources to get the job done, but we need better
to utilize them.
Finally, the door to the Governor's Office is always open to the
leaders of the farm agencies and the farm organizations and, in
fact, to every farmer of North Carolina who is working to
revitalize the agricultural economy of our state. The Governor's
Office has enjoyed an excellent working relationship with the
Commissioner of Agriculture and his department, with the North
Carolina State Grange, the Farm Bureau, North Carolina State
College and all the other agencies working to lift the level of
living of the rural families of our state.
So long as man must eat, so long as man must clothe himself
against the weather, so long as man enjoys a smoke, there will be
a place of leadership for agriculture in North Carolina.
We intend to give farming the rightful place in building a
greater North Carolina.
PRESENTATION OF FREEDOM ASSOCIATION
WORLD PEACE AWARD TO
DR. FRANK PORTER GRAHAM, EIGHTH ANNUAL
SOUTHEASTERN WORLD AFFAIRS INSTITUTE
Blue Ridge
July 29, 1961
After praising President Kennedy's quest for peace, Governor
Sanford added that the honoree of this occasion, Dr. Frank Porter
Graham, was also a champion of peace and freedom. He briefly
reviewed Dr. Graham's military career, his service to the cause of
education in North Carolina, and his political career. He
described Graham as a radical in that he believed and practiced
the radical belief of the golden rule; as a liberal in that he worked
for progress; as a conservative in that he believed in preserving
the customs, traditions, and history of the past; and as a reaction-
ary in that he believed in the power of the individual as did
Jefferson, Jackson, Lincoln, and Wilson. Sanford, commenting
on the fitness of honoring Frank Porter Graham again, said that
the tallest monument to him was to be found in the minds of
men all over North Carolina, the United States, and the world.
166
Papers of Terry Sanford
SUMMER LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE
NORTH CAROLINA CLASSROOM TEACHERS
ASSOCIATION
Mars Hill
August 2, 1961
The Governor, in this address on education, stressed the role
of the teacher in the formative years of a child's growth. He com-
pared the teacher to an actor on the stage, saying many were
full-time professionals though some, while paid to work full time,
actually put other interests first and devoted only part of their
time to teaching. He urged teachers to analyze their own attitudes
and make constant efforts to improve the quality of their work.
For those behind the scenes, for all the citizens, the burden was
heavy, but it remained the full-time professional teacher who had
the direct responsibility of molding the nation's future. Governor
Sanford said he had insisted on salary increases of 22 per cent
because he felt teachers earned the increase. As Governor, he was
going to require more than a 22 per cent increase in teaching
proficiency. He told the teachers that the spotlight was on them
and suggested that they "raise the curtain and get on with this
high drama of educating the boys and girls of our state."
ANNUAL SUPERINTENDENTS CONFERENCE
Mars Hill
August 9, 1961
As he had done when he addressed the classroom teachers a
week earlier, Governor Sanford again emphasized the role of
the group to which he was speaking as he discussed quality educa-
tion. "I Am Climbing Jacob's Ladder," the theme song of the
conference, was taken by the Governor as a means of comparing
the job of the superintendents with the challenges presented by
the spiritual. He said that when financial support granted by the
General Assembly became a reality, school people were faced with
the decision of how to get the job done and that there was no
time for self-congratulation. Again Sanford compared the educa-
tional program with a drama, this time calling the superintend-
ents the directors of the production. He called for them to value
the needed sense of timing, the making of decisions, and the
sensitiveness to social change with the constant effort toward
Public Addresses and Summaries
167
improvement. So as to bring in all interested people, lines of
communication had to be kept open, but the single most impor-
tant segment of the superintendents' job was to help the teachers
do a better job. He urged the group to keep up with events as
they happened and evaluate the school program regularly; he
recommended accreditation of the schools by the Southern
Association of Colleges and Secondary Schools as a ''stimulation
for improvement. . . The desire to fill new jobs would be great,
even where qualified persons could not be found, and the temp-
tation to lower standards would have to be resisted. As the last
rung in the ladder, Sanford asked that the superintendents build
"a public image of the school that will reflect its true worth."
In conclusion he called for co-operation, saying, "As we all work
together in response to this challenge, I am proud to be numbered
among your company!"
AGRIBUSINESS CARAVAN LUNCHEON
Raleigh
August 10, 1961
On numerous occasions during his administration. Governor
Sanford emphasized the fact that farming was not dead in North
Carolina. To the group at this luncheon he said leaders of agri-
culture and business were working together. While North Caro-
lina had some of the richest farm land in the nation, it also had
some of the poorest farms and the most underpaid farmers. The
state needed new industry; it also neded income from the soil.
The Governor reminded the group that many problems of pro-
duction had been solved but that the problem of distribution was
still to be faced. In this connection he mentioned hungry people in
North Carolina and abroad, recalling the leadership of Kerr Scott
in the World Food Bank program, a program which had been
carried further during the Kennedy administration. Sanford said
that his administration intended to place emphasis on farming.
North Carolina's new Agricultural Opportunities Program, with
its objectives of lifting farm income, developing marketing and
processing facilities and services, promoting education for family
and community development, was cited as proof of North Caro-
lina's stand. With six out of every ten persons in the state living
in rural areas, there were over 190,000 farms; the total agriculture
business was worth $3.5 billion a year. The Governor promised
that his administration would see that proper consideration was
168
Papers of Terry Sanford
given to rural roads, would work to establish farm-related plants,
would promote export marketing possibilities, would give priority
to "agricultural opportunities" at conventions and similar gather-
ings, and would see that the Governor's Office served as the focal
point for all programs. Farming would be given a rightful place
in building a greater North Carolina.
DANIELS FAMILY REUNION
Wanchese
August 19, 1961
[Governor Sanford addressed members of the Daniels family at their
reunion at Wanchese. He talked about the contributions made by this par-
ticular family and then broadened his outlook to the "good family of man
on the new frontiers. . . ." The latter he called "the one hope of our world."]
It is good for a Governor of North Carolina to meet with one
of the strong families which have been so long among the keepers
of this shore of brave American beginnings. Probably there
never was a time when we needed more than now the recollection
of men who dared in the effort to establish a brave new world.
For after the centuries that remains our task still, and one as
hedged about with hazard as in the days when men crossed wide
sea to an unknown wilderness.
The seas are narrower now. And the wilderness we face all
over this globe is one of man's own making. Yet the vision which
prompted the voyage to this shore must be the same today in
terms of the hopes and hungers of people. I believe that the
courage of four centuries has never lapsed.
Like other North Carolinians, I have been aware of the un-
interrupted courage of men bearing the Daniels name who
manned the Coast Guard.
I like to remember, too, that when the very idea of flight in the
air seemed a great foolishness to many, there was a Daniels in
the group which helped the Wright brothers break the ignorance
^v hich kept man earthbound.
Sometimes in this day of missiles, it is easy to wish that men
had never left the ground. Still we know that when men could
cease to soar, the qualities which made them dare the seas would
be gone, too.
Our task greater than mere courage is to understand that we
must face every wilderness, and to know that there is no shore
anywhere which is not our concern. A Daniels gave us example of
that, too, and in days as threatening almost as those in which
Public Addresses and Summaries
169
we live today. Like most North Carolinians, I am proud of
Josephus Daniels who in the years when World War II was in-
evitably approaching exemplified the Good Neighbor policy of
Franklin Roosevelt in Latin America. I like to think that it was
the good neighbor policy, which has always been our pattern in
eastern North Carolina, that was the basis of the quality which
helped Josephus Daniels keep Mexico our great friend next door
when we were endangered in the whole world. And being here
today helps in understanding that only such similar good neigh-
borliness, as President Kennedy now means to put into creative
action, will keep us secure in time of threat of even greater war.
I like to attend such family reunions as this one. They give us
not only a time of pleasure meeting of families and friends but
an opportunity, too, to recall the good, strong men who built
America in neighborliness and can now only build a strong, free
world in neighborliness, too.
I know that sometimes such things as the foreign aid program
President Kennedy proposes, and which is jeopardized this very
week end by men failing in full vision and understanding, seem
complicated, costly, and distant from our daily concerns. Actually,
the Kennedy program is an extension of the vision and courage
which dared to broach the beaches here in daring for a new
and better world.
Here on the oldest American frontier, men like your families
and your fellows should understand the new frontiers best. And
in the reunion of an honored North Carolina family, we can
understand the need and meaning of the effort to build the family
of free men despite savagery at our doors and dangers in the
distance which are really as close as the waves on our own shores.
The good family of man on the new frontiers is the one hope
of our world.
NATIONAL SECURITY SEMINAR
Fort Bragg
August 25, 1961
[A diverse group of some 300 civilians, soldiers, businessmen, and top
military experts participated in this two-day seminar meeting in Fort
Bragg. Discussions on the nature of the Soviet threat and methods for
fighting the cold war were led by such proficient men as Dr. Frank Barnett,
Director of the Institute for American Strategy; Dr. Stefan Possony, George-
town University professor; and Arbor Gray, official of the Federal Bureau of
Investigation. In this opening night address, Governor Sanford expressed
the determined spirit of this generation, "willing to work for peace, but
. . . also willing to fight for freedom."]
170
Papers of Terry Sanford
We have, in recent days, reached one of those crises in history
when the fate of the free world hangs precariously in the bal-
ance. At this very hour, the fate of Berlin rides on a dictator's
whim and a democracy's determination. And the fate of Berlin
is just as important to all of the free world in the summer of
1961 as was the fate of the Polish Corridor in the summer of
1939.
The safety of the free world is endangered in the jungles of
not-so-far-away Laos. And the outcome of the Chinese Com-
munist aggression in Laos is as important to the free world in
1961 as was the outcome of the Japanese aggression in Man-
churia in 1931.
The threat to the independence of the newly free nations of
Africa is as grave to the free world in August of 1961 as was
the threat against Ethiopia by the strutting Mussolini in 1937.
[In the deleted portions, the Governor discussed the preference Americans
had for peace rather than for war, but he emphasized the fact that Americans
would fight if necessary. The portions omitted were similar to parts of the
Governor's address on the occasion of the dedication of the Benson National
Guard Armory. See pages 148-149.]
This seminar— composed as it is of civilians and soldiers,
representatives of management and representatives of labor, big
businessmen and small businessmen— shows the broad base of
American strength.
As vitally necessary as are military posts like Fort Bragg, I
believe that the ultimate strength of America will be found in
the schoolyards of our nation, rather than on the parade grounds.
I believe that what is going on in the classrooms is of equal, if
not greater, importance than what is going on in the briefing
rooms. I believe that the future of America will rise higher from
the laboratories of the schools than from the launching pads at
Cape Canaveral.
America's greatest fortress is not a Maginot Line, nor a Sieg-
fried Line. America's greatest fortress is the schoolhouse.
This nation's future will not be found at the end of the
tunnel to a fall-out shelter, even though those shelters are a
necessary safeguard in a time of crisis. The nation's future will be
found rather at the end of an academic procession at commence-
ment time. Therefore, I believe, it is as imperative to strengthen
our educational system as it is to strengthen our defense system.
I would like to add that free minds at work in free schools
are a far greater bastion of strength than the semisecret cells of
superpatriots. It seems to me that the neofascistic rantings of the
Public Addresses and Summaries 171
superpatriot organization in vogue at the moment are as danger-
ous to our freedoms as any foreign enemy.
As Mr. Sam Rayburn pointed out in Raleigh a few months ago,
America has had to suffer through these superpatriot groups
before. Some of Mr. Thomas Jefferson's friends were imprisoned
in the eighteenth century— for trying to exercise their rights as
free men. Then we had outfits like the Know-Nothing Party in
the nineteenth cenutry. We had the "American Firsters" around
the time of World War II. As a veteran of World War II, I am
as suspect of superpatriots of today as I was of the American-
Firsters.
President Kennedy at his inauguration aptly expressed the
determined spirit of this generation of Americans: "Born in this
century, tempered by war, disciplined by a hard and bitter peace,
proud of our ancient heritage— and unwilling to witness or
permit the slow undoing of those human rights to which this
nation has always been committed."
No group could better understand this determination and no
group could be more ready to fight to preserve these national
commitments than one like this. There is no question about this
readiness and willingness to fight and die; the question is will we
also take the leadership in defending "our ancient heritage"
without fighting. Will we, again in the words of John F. Kennedy,
"begin anew the quest for peace, before the dark powers of de-
struction unleashed by science engulf all humanity in planned or
accidental self-destruction?"
It is a paradox that fighting is less difficult for the democratic
mind to grasp than is the "quest for peace." Fighting unleashes
the native spirit, while the quest for peace requires all the re-
straints, and all the patience, and all the understanding with
which man, unhappily, is not naturally endowed at birth. That
has been the story of most wars. Patience, understanding, re-
straint, not fully developed in man, failed.
You know better than many that talking is better than shooting,
that negotiating is easier than digging foxholes, and that debat-
ing—however vitriolic— burns a man less than white phosphorous
or radiation.
The United States and the other nations of the world have
found in the last fifteen years around the tables of the United
Nations that restraint and patience are not natural attributes of
man, but they know bombast is better than bombs and the insult
of words is less disrespectful than the insult of death.
When we are tempted to despair of the fruitless argument
around West Ninety-second Street, we might well remember the
172
Papers of Terry Sanford
lethal arguments aroung Bastogne, around Guadalcanal, and
around Pusan.
We all know that American military might is capable of
destroying Soviet cities— and Khrushchev's missiles could des-
troy ours. This is the cold fact that has helped keep the cold war
from growing too hot. This is why we continue to fight our
fights around the conference tables at the United Nations. I
firmly believe that the United Nations, supported by the strength
of the United States and other free nations, has kept us out of
World War III.
The battle of the free world is being fought today around the
corridors of the United Nations and around the lobbies of Capitol
Hill in Washington, as well as around the Brandenburg Gate in
Berlin. The battle in Washington may not be as dramatic. But
in the long run, it may well be more important than that show
of force in Berlin.
I refer, of course, to the battle on the President's foreign aid
program. Men of little vision have threatened to cripple the
President's foreign aid program. If they crippled his military
preparedness program, they could hardly do more damage.
We must in this hour of peril keep our military guard up.
But we must go further. We must also keep our educational
system moving forward. We must keep our industrial might on
the march. We must revitalize that great secret weapon in our
arsenal— our agricultural resources.
Finally, I believe, we must extend the hand of help to the
underdeveloped nations. Foreign aid is costly. But when you
measure the cost of it against the cost of war and against the cost
of suffering and against the cost of limb and life, foreign aid is
the least expensive investment with the greatest promise of
return that America could make.
CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG SCHOOL CONVOCATION
Charlotte
August 30, 1961
Governor Sanford, at the opening of a new school year, referred
to education as the foundation of all other North Carolina pro-
grams. With supplemental funds appropriated by the 1961
General Assembly, the time had come to implement the quality
education program. The Governor reminded the group that
professional educators could not do the job alone, that much
Public Addresses and Summaries
173
reliance would be placed on top school units such as those of the
Charlotte-Mecklenburg area. He suggested that wasted time could
not be afforded, that inefficient teachers and lazy students and
selfish parents could not be tolerated. Students would have to
desire to learn if quality education were achieved. Parents would
have to take an interest in the work of their children, see that
homework was assigned and done, and encourage extra reading;
they would also need to seek to know teachers and understand
guidance programs. Teachers, the key personnel, would have to
devote full time to teaching and periodic reappraisals of their
individual attitudes and work. Superintendents, principals, board
members would have to know what needed to be done; they were
asked to inform members of the community about the school
program and to help teachers do a better job. The Governor
commented that individual responsibility and co-operative en-
deavor would succeed in improving the schools.
CEREMONY OF TRANSFER OF
U.S.S. 'NORTH CAROLINA" FROM NAVY TO STATE
Bayonne^ New Jersey
September 6, 1961
The U.S.S. "North Carolina" was heading home to North Caro-
lina, thanks to the contributions of the many who made the
project possible. Governor Sanford expressed appreciation to those
people and said that the ship would serve as a constant reminder
of the determination of free men to fight despotism and op-
pression. The ship, scheduled to begin its final voyage near the
Statue of Liberty, was to sail past the origins of the nation:
Philadelphia, Washington, Yorktown, Jamestown, Roanoke Is-
land. The order of the day was peace; Americans were willing to
work for peace but were determined to fight for freedom.
Governor Sanford called the ship, headed for its final port of
call, a "memorial to the men who dared the deep for freedom's
sake."
SEMIANNUAL MEETING
TIDEWATER ALUMNI CHAPTER
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA
Norfolk, Virginia
September 6, 1961
Governor Sanford's address to the Norfolk area group of alumni
of the University of North Carolina dealt with the problems and
174
Papers of Terry Sanford
potentials surrounding the rapid growth of the institution. The
Governor remarked that North Carolina was rapidly moving into
the mainstream of American life, and part of the credit for this
progress had to be attributed to the university. Under the leader-
ship of President Harry Woodburn Chase, the school became a
member of the Association of American Universities. To recruit
and retain good faculty members had long been a goal, but the
salary scale had to be high enough to hold competent people.
Sanford commented on criticisms made to growth, but he added
that it was both undesirable and impossible for the school to
stand still. The advantages of a large library, cultural and intel-
lectual events, student self-government, extracurricular activities,
and student publications would be obvious, but students needed
also the advantages of small classes and individual attention. To
achieve this happy combination, the Governor suggested a system
of small classes and laboratories with large lectures by outstanding
professors. Governor Sanford referred to the proposed visit of
President Kennedy to Chapel Hill, saying the President would
see a beautiful campus, an institution of heritage and distinction,
and would be introduced to students of high caliber. Achieve-
ments at the university had been made because of men with vision
and faith; the Governor pleaded for continued courage, vision,
and sacrifices on behalf of the Chapel Hill school.
NORTHWESTERN AREA
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE
WiLKESBORO
September 7, 1961
In speaking to the Area Industrial Development Conference
in Wilkesboro, Governor Sanford discussed opportunities avail-
able in the area. He referred to the fact that part of northwestern
North Carolina had been considered a distressed area, but he
spoke of the potential which was there. Opportunities and re-
sources made planning imperative. Again he stressed the impor-
tance of local citizens taking the initiative, with the help of the
state, to build a sounder economy than ever before.
Public Addresses and Summaries
175
WEEKS LAW GOLDEN ANNIVERSARY CELEBRATION
BiLTMORE Forest, Asheville
September 26, 1961
In introducing Secretary of Agriculture Orville Freeman on
the occasion of the observance of the enactment of the Weeks
Law fifty years earlier, Governor Sanford recalled that the first
tract of land purchased under the act was in North Carolina at
Pisgah National Forest. Since that time more than 20 million
acres across the nation had been acquired under this legislation.
North Carolina's interest in forestry was briefly reviewed. The
Governor said that of the 31,267,000 acres in the state, more than
64 per cent was occupied by forests. The value of the manu-
facture of forestry products annually exceeded |1 billion. North
Carolina furniture factories used lumber, 45 per cent of which
was produced in the state. A wider variety of trees was found
in North Carolina than on the entire European continent. In
1960, 17.4 per cent of the state's manufacturing labor force
derived its livelihood from forestry-related occupations. Problems
existed, but faith in the land and in the people would be shown
and forests would become more productive in the years ahead
than they had been in the past.
DEDICATION OF
BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL WOMEN'S
CLUB HEADQUARTERS
Chapel Hill
October 1, 1961
At the dedication of a new headquarters building for the
Business and Professional Women's Clubs, the Governor had an
opportunity to express his philosophy concerning the vital role
played by women in North Carolina. Under the leadership of
women such as those in this organization, Sanford said that North
Carolina women "have moved from the skillet and the spinning
wheel to the drafting board and the Univac." Though women
still retained their rightful place in the kitchen and in the home,
they also had a place *'in the classroom, the salesroom, the business
office, the laboratory, and the operating room." The leadership
of women throughout history was cited by references to Isabella
of Spain, Joan of Arc, and Elizabeth of England; in North
176
Papers of Terry Sanford
Carolina history Cornelia Phillips Spencer, who played a major
role in the reopening of the University of North Carolina at
Chapel Hill following the Civil War, was mentioned as another
example of leadership. As time passed, more and more women
occupied positions of trust, including Justice Susie Sharp, Repre-
sentatives Grace Rodenbough and Rachel Davis, and Welfare
Commissioner Ellen Winston. Sanford said he had appointed
more than 100 women to boards, commissions, and agencies. The
need for women's idealism along with their clear thinking and
their practical ideas was keenly felt, and the chief executive
urged those in his audience to lend support to the bond issues to
be voted on November 7. He told the women that they were "not
clothed in old lace of a time gone by," and that he knew they
would join "in moving out to build a better North Carolina. . . ."
SOUTH PIEDMONT DISTRICT NCEA
Kannapolis ,
October 3, 1961
[With the passage of the quality education program by the General
Assembly, a major victory had been won, but the implementation of the
program was the responsibility of the school people and the citizens of
North Carolina. Governor Sanford undertook to travel to all 100 counties
to convince the people of their part in making quality education a reality.
In this address he called for unified action from teachers, parents, students,
and professional administrators; he outlined briefly the responsibility which
he expected each group to assume.]
It is appropriate that the educational leaders of this great
industrial area convene here today to map battle plans in the war
against ignorance and to prepare blueprints for the erection of
better schools in a state where the weak truly can grow strong
and the strong will grow great.
In a world where the freedom, and, indeed, the very existence
of man is threatened, it is in keeping with the finest tradition of
North Carolina and of America that our rallying point should
be the schoolhouse and not a military parade field.
Human liberties, gained over a period of thousands of years,
are at this moment being threatened in the divided streets of
Berlin and in the jungles of Laos and Africa. Human life itself,
evolved over the span of tens of thousands of years, is imperiled.
A week ago, President Kennedy acutely appraised the world
crises we face today: "The events and decisions of the next ten
months," he noted, "may well decide the fate of man for the
Public Addresses and Summaries
177
next 10,000 years. ..." And, the President continued, "Unless
man can match his strides in weaponry and technology with equal
strides in social and political development, our great strength,
like that of the dinosaur, will become incapable of proper control
—and man, like the dinosaur, will decline and disappear."
You probably noticed that the period of time forecast by the
President to be the months in which civilization, as we know it,
will move forward or go the way of the dinosaur coincides with
this school year.
President Kennedy's forthright challenge to the Soviets to
replace the arms race with a peace race makes your jobs as educa-
tors all the more vital.
Whether the Soviet and Chinese Communists will accept that
challenge will be determined by Moscow and Peiping. But what-
ever their answer, your job and mine this school year is the
same.
For, put in its bleakest terms, education is survival. If the
Communists insist on continuing the arms race and should they
cross that narrow line between this cold war and a hot war,
education will constitute one of the greatest weapons in our
arsenal of defense.
I strongly believe that what is happening in the classrooms in
North Carolina today will ultimately be more important to man-
kind than what is happening in the briefing rooms at Seymour-
Johnson Air Base. And what is happening in the laboratories of
the schools of this district and this state eventually will have a
greater bearing on our future than what is happening on the
launching pads at Cape Canaveral. The schoolyard is as vital to
our defense as the military parade fields at Fort Bragg and Camp
Lejeune.
If, in a moment of sanity at the Kremlin, the Communists
should accept the President's challenge and offer for a peace
race, then our schools will set the pace for a better world.
This decision of a peace race or an arms race is not one that
we can resolve here in Kannapolis. But you and I can play our
part. Here in our own small part of the free world, we can do no
less than seek the best as we prepare to do our part in defending
America and the free world.
Education is the foundation rock on which North Carolina,
America, and free nations everywhere must build.
Here in the South Piedmont and here in North Carolina, we
must adequately educate the scientists, the statesmen, and the
citizenry who will fully understand and who are equipped to
defend and promote the ideals of our dynamic democracy of
the twentieth century.
178
Papers of Terry Sanford
If you call the roll of individual goals, or district goals, or
state, national, or international goals, you will return to one
ringing conclusion: The way to all these objectives is education!
What is the best device for increasing economic skills so the
students of today can make better livings tomorrow? Education!
What is the best method for picking up the per capita income
of this district and this state? Education!
What is the fundamental for military defense in an age of
space and rocket races? Education!
What is the hope for developing statesmen and leaders and a
comprehending citizenry? Education.
And so it goes. Indeed, education of our boys and girls is the
most compelling single ambition and the most promising hope
in the lives of the people of this district, state, and nation.
Because of the vital role education plays in national defense,
because of the integral part education exerts in economic develop-
ment for both individual citizens and the state and nation, because
all our goals and all of our hopes for North Carolina rest on the
rock of education, this school year may well be the most important
in our lifetime.
Another compelling reason why this school year is so important
is that we have now reached in North Carolina the time for
action in implementing the quality education program for which
so many have struggled so long against so many obstacles.
The people have voiced approval of bold and giant strides. The
elected representatives of the people in the General Assembly have
provided the money requested by the State Board of Education.
Now it is your job as educators to carry out this mandate and
to prove that the investment in quality education is an invest-
ment that will net our citizens excellent returns.
We have reached in North Carolina a time for action. We
cannot afford the luxury of wasted time or ineffective teachers or
lazy students or selfish parents. Nor can we afford to use our schools
to provide a winter resort for students, a baby-sitting nursery for
parents, a Roman holiday entertainment spectacle for the public,
and for teachers a part-time way to make a full-time salary.
I recognize that achieving quality education cannot be accom-
plished solely by educators. It is going to require the united
efforts of us all. The state administration will do its part. This
rally here today is one of at least 100 that are being scheduled in
each of the counties of North Carolina. Moreover, the Governor's
Office is working closely with committees that are seeking solutions
to the problems facing you, the educators.
Just last Friday, I had the privilege of discussing three of the
major school problems with three separate committees: the Stay
Public Addresses and Summaries
179
In School Committee, the Committee on Education Beyond the
High School, and the leaders of the Curriculum Study.
We must look to students, parents, other citizens, school boards,
teachers, principals, superintendents, and all people connected
with the schools. Where does each of them fit into the pattern of
a program to make our schools second to none?
What has the student to do with achieving quality education?
I say to students that quality education is not something that
you get out of a box, ready-mixed. It is not something that is going
to be given to you. It cannot be said to students: "Here it is. Now
come and pick it up." Quality education stems from the fact that
you have earnest students who want to learn. Unless there is a
desire on the part of the student to learn and to take advantage
of the opportunities and the teaching that we hope to continue to
move up in quality, then we are not going to have any quality
education.
Unless students work at it, unless they want to learn, there'll
be no quality education for them. If they do want to learn, if they
are sincerely trying to prepare for their opportunities in life, then
we hope to improve the chances of their being properly prepared.
I am sure that any student now going back can make a great
contribution to his own future, realizing that this is not something
to be handed to him, but something that he must want and for
which he must work.
What have the parents to do with quality education?
First, they should take a direct and daily interest in the school-
work of their children. Unless the parents are willing to insist
that homework be assigned and that homework be done, unless
the parents encourage extra reading and study from time to time,
unless the parents concern themselves with the student and the
school, we will not make much progress.
I would like to see every local school and every local PTA make
a major effort to get parents and teachers to know each other
better. Somehow, we tend to distrust people we do not know. It
is tragic when parents and teachers distrust each other. I would
like to see the major portion of each PTA meeting given over
to getting parents and teachers better acquainted with each other
and better acquainted with the program in the public school
designed to provide quality education for the children in the
schools. This would mean that routine business would be handled
by giving out mimeographed bulletins. Things like the minutes
of the last meeting, committee reports, budget information, and
announcements could be handled in a monthly PTA newsletter.
180
Papers of Terry Sanford
This getting acquainted and better understanding would be an
extension of the school's guidance program. Each child needs two
advocates, one in the home and one in the school. Certainly, any
intelligent effort at counseling can be much more effective if the
home and the school pool their knowledge about and concern for
the welfare of the child.
There is another thing it would do. It would make parents
understand better and appreciate more the educational opportu-
nities the school offers and it will help teachers understand better
and be more sympathetic toward the needs of individual children.
If we are going to promote united efforts to improve education,
we must first agree on what the job of the school should be. The
school's job is an educational job and its primary responsibility is
to provide for intellectual development. It shares with other
agencies like the home and the church responsibility for health
and citizenship and home membership. We cannot, however, give
the school such a large part of these responsibilities that it cannot
accomplish its major job, the promotion of intellectual develop-
ment. Sometimes we parents are at fault. There are so many good
things we want for our children and the school is such a convenient
place to dump these responsibilities. We must redouble our efforts
to educate the public to expect a quality educational effort from
the school but not to expect the school to accomplish everything
for our children. We are going to have to be willing to let the
school give up some of the outside jobs we now expect it to assume.
What can the teachers do?
The classroom teacher is the key, the on-stage actor in the drama
of quality education. I want you to know that I fully recognize
this fact. All that has been done in the General Assembly, by the
State Board of Education, by school officials and local boards, and
by the Governor's Office has merely served to set the stage. The
play is yet to be given. And on the teachers' performance in the
classrooms of North Carolina will depend the success of our
venture.
Success is the product of a united effort by many people. With-
out this united effort, all else may fail. But the success of the
teacher depends heavily on his own ability and effort. It is toward
following this united effort with personal effort that I want to
urge all teachers with all the earnestness at my command.
The new day is dawning in North Carolina. The stage is set.
The props that we asked for have been provided. The audience is
waiting, expectantly, for this new day in education, this program
of quality education for which they have bought their tickets.
They have been sold on the advertising. Now they want to see the
play!
Public Addresses and Summaries
181
There are many teachers who have parts in this play, nearly
40,000 of them. Most are full-time professional people who give
to teaching their full measure of devotion. They even give of their
own time in the summer and at other times to becoming better
prepared, professionally.
There are others who are part-time teachers with two jobs or
divided loyalties. While paid for full-time teaching, they do not
give their full measure of devotion to teaching.
I am convinced that quality education will not be achieved by
depending on part-time teachers.
The success of our venture will depend on devoted, full-time
teachers, and enough of them to play all the key roles. It will
depend on an effective curriculum, on good books and enough of
them, on strong leadership and direction, on all the props that
help the teacher do a good job in the classroom.
But I emphasize again that there will be no quality education
across North Carolina unless individual teachers clearly under-
stand that they must deliver quality education in the classrooms.
I recommend, first, that every individual teacher at the begin-
ning of school engage in careful self-examination. I would suggest
these eight questions:
How can I do a better job?
What are my shortcomings and how can I overcome them?
How can I reach every child and bring out the best within him?
Have I been lazy at times, or indifferent, or unconcerned?
And don't just ask these questions. Answer them!
Am I taking every opportunity to improve my professional
competence?
Do I realize that this child's future is in my hands, and my
failure now will mar him in some degree for life?
Have I set high standards for myself which I am willing to
follow?
Am I living up to the severe challenge of my noble calling?
I recommend to teachers that they write these questions down,
add others of their own, and paste them on their mirrors for review
each morning. There is no end to improvement.
No professional person advances or succeeds without daily self-
examination and constant effort at improvement. I know this is
true of the legal profession, and I am sure it is true of the teaching
profession.
What can principals, superintendents, and boards of education
do?
Principals, superintendents, members of boards of education,
182
Papers of Terry Sanford
and school committees must move together if we are going to have
quality education.
In terms of leadership, superintendents are the key people, and
principals are their field lieutenants. These are the executive
officers of the most important business in North Carolina.
To give effective leadership, superintendents and principals
must either know themselves what needs to be done or they must
be able to use the knowledge of experts in an effective way. They
must lead out with ideas and provide guidance in giving con-
structive direction to change— or at least not stand in the way of
improvement. There is no set pattern. It lakes daily decisions,
constant intelligence, positive determination to find ways every
day to make their schools better. They must involve in school
improvement all of the people concerned. This means students
and parents as well as teachers. It means citizens who have no
children in school, as well as school board and school committee
members. This means leadership, and it will not be achieved
by the dictator who doesn't want any opinion expressed but his
own. It will not be reached by the principal or superintendent
who is afraid to let the lay public in the school for fear they will
find out what is going on.
It will require that lines of communication be kept open. The
school board, the PTA, and the public in general must be kept
informed and must have an open channel to make suggestions.
The school executive must be able to inform members of the
community in such a way as to raise high the level of the kind
of education they expect. He must not be afraid to tell the truth
about the schools, even the unpleasant truth. Citizens cannot be
left behind while the professional school man runs the schools.
He must be able and willing to present a point clearly and
forcibly through contacts with his board and with leaders in the
community.
It must be remembered that superintendents, principals, and
their staffs exist solely to make more effective the instructional
program. They must remember that their job is to help the
teacher do a better job, and not to think up more ways to dis-
sipate the teacher's time and energy attending more meetings
and making out more reports. I sincerely hope that the new
assistant superintendents and supervisors across the state assigned
to instruction and curriculum will provide for teachers the help
they do not have time to provide for themselves rather than to
demand more of the teachers' time and energy and thus take time
away from the students.
School boards and committees have the job of knowing what
is going on and working for improvement. They make and
Public Addresses and Summaries
183
support sound policy. They make and support the essential
decisions which will lead to improvement.
Still another important characteristic is the election to school
boards and school committee membership of well-qualified people
who are dedicated and informed in the services that they render.
I cannot overemphasize the importance of this. Real unity in any
school community cannot be achieved without united, dedicated
board and committee members who put child welfare first, last,
and always!
I am encouraged to know that the State Department of Public
Instruction is actively engaged in strengthening the state ac-
creditation policies and procedures. As soon as possible, every
school should be re-evaluated. Much of the value of accredita-
tion will lie in the stimulation for improvement that will come
to the local school. This is the basic purpose and the most im-
portant outcome of evaluation.
North Carolina is seeking a new curriculum, a curriculum
with power— "power in itself to challenge the latent germ of
genius, great or small, classical or modern, academic or techni-
cal, that every educable human being has within him in some
degree." It is only in the light of this curriculum study that we
are investing another |100 million toward the achievement of
this goal. We await results with hope and with confidence, aware
that this is a never-ending task.
The duty of improving the schools and thereby the future of
North Carolina is laid upon the shoulders of every citizen of
the state.
The state administration is doing all it can; the school leaders
and the teachers will exceed all that is expected of them. I call
on students and parents to take seriously their part. In fact, we
need the help of everybody if we are to make our schools and
our opportunities second to none.
As James Bryant Conant put it: "The road to better schools
will be paved by the collective action of the local citizenry. The
responsibility for the sorely needed upgrading of our schools
cannot be passed to the state legislatures or to Congress. The
responsibility rests on every citizen in the land."
184
Papers of Terry Sanford
STATE CONVENTION OF
DEMOCRATIC WOMEN OF NORTH CAROLINA
Winston-Salem
October 5, 1961
[This convention was the first state-wide meeting of its kind to be staged
by Democratic women of North Carolina. Governor Sanford, who in his
first year of office had filled some 100 state positions of responsibility with
women, was well qualified to speak on women's role in government. He
called for support from the women in the November 7 bond election.]
It is a happy privilege to participate with you in this conven-
tion of Democratic women of North Carolina.
I see here tonight the leaders who left your flower gardens to
do the spade work for the victory the Democratic party achieved
in North Carolina last November 8. You are the ones who left
your cookstoves to stoke the fires that produced the steam that
made possible the majorities for president and governor and the
other offices. You took the needle from your sewing basket and
stuck it into the over-inflated balloon of our opposition.
In short, you blazed the trail in a new day to the New Fron-
tier.
Your work of 1960 surpassed that of any women's group in
any campaign since the days of the suffragettes.
Since that day when women reached out and grasped the
ballot, North Carolina and American politics have improved.
The domination of special interest groups and the control of
machine bosses have diminished in direct proportion to the ac-
tivity of women Democrats.
In forty short years, you have moved from the disenfranchised
who was supposed to stay in her place in the kitchen to positions
of trust and leadership in practically every department and agen-
cy of local, state, national, and international government. All the
citizens— men, women, boys and girls— have been the beneficiaries.
In an age that tends to be cynical, women Democrats have
brought idealism to government. You also have brought integ-
rity and ability. When some of the male leaders have been
tempted to close their minds on various projects, you have been
there to ask your sharp question of "Why not?" When some of
the local, state, and national agencies threatened to get into ruts,
you have manned the bulldozers of political action and filled in
those ruts.
It has been my happy privilege to fill some 100 of the most
important positions of trust in state government with women. I
will appoint many more before this administration is over.
Public Addresses and Summaries
185
I am here to admit, to acknowledge, and to testify to the fact
that this administration could not have been inaugurated without
your great help, and it could not have achieved the goals of
quality education that we have thus far achieved for the children
of North Carolina without you, and it will of necessity rely
heavily on you for the next three years and three months.
[At this point in the address, Governor Sanford cited thirty or forty
women appointed to various boards, commissions, and committees during
his administration. See the list of appointments in the Appendix to this
volume.]
It is easy to see from this list, and I could go on reading it until
midnight, that women are occupying more positions of trust in
North Carolina's governmental life than ever before.
Susie Sharp of Reidsville^^ is one of North Carolina's outstand-
ing jurists. Grace Rodenbough of Stokes County®^ and Rachel
Davis of Lenoir County^-^ are leading legislators. Dr. Ellen
Winston'^^ is one of the most capable administrators in state
government.
That precedent goes back through the history of our state,
nation, and world. In North Carolina, striking examples of the
leadership of women through the ages are pointed up in our
history books by the ringing of the bell at Chapel Hill by Cor-
nelia Phillips Spencer to reopen our university after the Civil
War had closed it. And you know of the way Dorothea Dix came
into North Carolina and turned the bright spotlight of public
attention on the "snakepits" in which persons suffering mental
illnesses had been cast.
But what we are concerned with primarily tonight is not the
past but the future.
The future of this state is bound up with organizations like
the Democratic Women of North Carolina. I don't have to tell
this organization the progress that North Carolina has achieved
»3 Susie Marshall Sharp (1907- ) , lawyer, 1929-1949, from Reidsville; Judge
of Superior Court, 1949-1962; first woman to be appointed Associate Justice of
State Supreme Court, March, 1962; re-elected in own right on November 6, 1962.
North Carolina Manual, 1963, 517.
^ Grace Taylor Rodenbough (1896- ), educator, homemaker, civic and cul-
tural leader from Walnut Cove; member of legislature since 1953. Powell, North
Carolina Lives, 1058-1059.
^ Rachel Darden Davis III (1905- ) , physician and farmer from Lenoir
County; member of state legislature, 1959-1963. North Carolina Manual, 1963, 566.
^ Ellen Black Winston (1903- ) , author, professor, and public servant from
Raleigh; Commissioner of State Board of Public Welfare, 1944-1961; appointed
1961 as United States Welfare Commissioner. North Carolina Manual, 1961, 434-
436; News and Observer, December 20, 1962.
186
Papers of Terry Sanford
under the Democratic party— the progress in education, in good
roads, in mental hospitals, in the arts and cultural activities, and
in all the many other activities of state government.
And I don't have to reiterate the part women of North Caro-
lina have played in the Democratic party.
I trust that as citizens first, women second, and Democrats
third, you will assume as one of your major projects in these
next thirty-three days the adoption of the bond issues.
Every one of the issues has been carefully scrutinized, first by
college administrators and trustees and the agency heads, then
by the Advisory Budget Commission of 1960, then by the appro-
priations subcommittees and full committees in both the State
House of Representatives and the State Senate.
Now these ten bond issues are up to the voters. Every cent
of the 161,665,000 proposed in these issues is needed: it is need-
ed so your children and mine will have classroom space when
they go to college; it is needed for the treatment and rehabili-
tation of the mentally ill; it is needed to develop our ports so
they can boost the economy of North Carolina; it is needed for
the training schools so that we can help delinquent children
become self-respecting and self-supporting adults; it is needed
for agricultural research stations so that we may reinvigorate our
farm economy; it is needed for protecting and preserving our
historical assets; it is needed to conserve and develop our rich
forest potential and our park system; it is needed for working
space for state employees at the state capital.
In short, these ten bond issues are needed for the future of
North Carolina.
North Carolina has never trembled at the future. North Caro-
lina has never fainted at a challenge. North Carolina has never
shirked her duty to her posterity.
I don't believe North Carolina's women, and men, intend to
tremble or faint or shirk now.
I believe you and all the citizens of the state will vote "yes"
on November 7.
I am counting on your help.
Public Addresses and Summaries
187
FIFTY-FIFTH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE
NORTH CAROLINA TEXTILE MANUFACTURERS
ASSOCIATION
Pinehurst
October 6, 1961
The Governor began by commenting that approximately 44
per cent of all manufacturing employees in North Carolina were
in the textile industry, a fact which proved that the hopes and
dreams of a large segment of the population lay with the busi-
ness. Sanford said that state government had assured its support
to textile leaders when he urged adoption of a resolution at the
Southern Governors' Conference calling for federal action to
strengthen the position of the American textile industry. The
resolution called for help in preventing textile imports from
weakening the industry's economic strength. The pessimism of
those who prophesied doom for the industry was largely unjus-
tifiable, for new population would create new demand, but
research was also a key factor. The Research Triangle was cited
as a symbol of the state's dedication to research; the textile
enterprise would have to follow suit. The Governor urged an
interest in insuring the development of quality cotton within
North Carolina, saying this was a joint responsibility of the
textile industry and such groups as the North Carolina Cotton
Growers Cooperative Association and the Farmers Cooperative
Exchange. Governor Sanford encouraged the group to face the
challenges and take advantage of the opportunities in North
Carolina.
ANNUAL MEETING
FIFTH DISTRICT MEDICAL SOCIETY
Pinehurst
October 11, 1961
The future of North Carolina and the part the medical pro-
fession would play in that future demanded great responsibility
of each member of the medical society. Calling on the member-
ship to assume positions of leadership in civic affairs, the Gov-
ernor particularly urged support of the bond election to be held
on November 7, 1961. He explained ways in which the money
would be spent. Under essential capital improvements, a variety
188
Papers of Terry Sanford
of programs across the state would progress, including expansion
of the North Carolina Health Center in Chapel Hill. The needs
of mental health programs would also be covered, and mental
institutions would reap benefits by a favorable vote on the bonds.
Funds would be made available for participation, by the Medi-
cal Care Commission, in local hospital construction. Other is-
sues, while of less direct concern to the medical profession, would
benefit North Carolina; these, too, deserved and needed the
support of each member of the medical society.
DEDICATION CEREMONIES
JUVENILE EVALUATION CENTER
SW^ANNANOA
October 14, 1961
Governor Sanford turned his attention westward to Swannanoa
and to the newest facility for combating juvenile delinquency.
Speaking of the new center, he said the state would "be richly
rewarded for . . . [its] investment each time a child finds love
and understanding and real purpose in a life once clouded w^ith
confusion, antagonism, fear, and, in many instances, hopeless-
ness." He spoke of the rapid progress made in the field of youth
rehabilitation. That responsibility had been accepted and sup-
ported by the majority of citizens was evidenced by the seven
correction and training facilities maintained by the state. The
Governor called attention to a national study which showed the
programs of North Carolina and Florida to be the best in the
Southeast and among the best in the nation. He thanked the
dedicated persons who actually administered the programs, add-
ing that the increase in juvenile delinquency and violence of
juvenile crimes meant a greater challenge of working with these
young people. The Governor said that the dedication of this
facility was onlv the beginning; he expressed hope that this cere-
mony would be used as a "source of inspiration for the battles
yet to be fought."
KENTUCKY DEMOCRATIC DINNER
Lexington, Kentucky
October 14, 1961
In an address in Kentucky, Sanford spoke of the strong ties
between Kentucky and North Carolina. He referred to the 1949
Public Addresses and Summaries
189
Jefferson-Jackson Day Dinner in Raleigh, while he was serving
as president of the Young Democratic Clubs of North Carolina,
at which Kentucky's Alben W. Barkley spoke. Barkley attracted
an overflow crowd to hear him trace the history of the Demo-
cratic party, a history which Sanford told the group was as vital
as ever, with the addition of a chapter on the New Frontier. The
principles of the Democratic party were unchanged. Sanford
described the party as one willing to "use a round wheel when
it is proved that a round wheel will carry the needs of the people
better than a square wheel," one that believed in free enter-
prise, that believed in the responsibility of a prosperous nation
to help the indigent, that believed in reinvigorating the farms
and in educating the people. The Governor observed that the
Democratic party was the one that "votes yes to the future."
To further his support of the party and its principles, he cited
goals and achievements made in Kentucky and in North Caro-
lina under Democratic administrations, mentioning specifically
education, highways, and agriculture. He praised Governor Bert
T. Combs for his leadership in Kentucky. Calling the Demo-
cratic party's program in North Carolina and Kentucky and in
all America "adventurous and . . . more governed by hopes than
fears," Sanford remembered that the party had led the country
through nearly every difficult period in its history, and that
history had made "clear the wisdom of most of the startling re-
forms proposed by the Democrats over the years." He said that
"history almost forces one to be a Democrat. . . ." Sanford ended
his address by remarking that the Democratic party was willing
to help people and willing "to take the courageous steps that
today's changing world requires."
OPENING CEREMONIES OF THE
NINETY-FOURTH NORTH CAROLINA STATE FAIR
Raleigh
October 16, 1961
This gubernatorial speech was a ringing invitation to North
Carolinians and to out-of-state visitors to attend the State Fair.
The Governor commented that anyone who went to the fair
would see North Carolina on display, that agriculture would be
emphasized because North Carolina was an agricultural state
with a future closely associated with farming. The fair provided
abundant evidence to support faith in the future of North
190
Papers of Terry Sanford
Carolina agriculture. He added that agriculture and industry
complemented each other and that evidence of this was shown
by the Trade Fair in Charlotte. The State Fair stood as a symbol
of what North Carolina had become and what it could do. Gov-
ernor Sanford closed with a commendation to Commissioner
L. Y. Ballentine of the State Department of Agriculture, the fair
staff, and the exhibitors.
GOVERNOR'S CONFERENCE ON
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Chapel Hill
November 1, 1961
North Carolina, in seeking to provide more jobs at higher
wages, had made great strides in economic development, but since
Governor Sanford chose to talk about "hard facts and hard work,"
he emphasized the goals yet to be won rather than past accom-
plishments. He discussed the problem of the migration of Tar
Heel workers to other regions for greater opportunities, for ex-
ample, saying that statistics showed that the state would have to
work hard to overcome obstacles. He suggested that the citizenry
was intelligent and productive, and that conferences such as the
one held in Chapel Hill could help work out solutions to prob-
lems in the economy. Because of the economic differences in
various sections of the state, programs for area development were
needed. The Governor said that local governments could do a
great deal independently, but that some projects required co-
operation between localities. He concluded with a commendation
for this conference, which he called "a forum for North Carolina's
future."
SOUTH CENTRAL PIEDMONT NORTH CAROLINA
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE
Concord
November 2, 1961
Governor Sanford again called for self-evaluation by communi-
ties seeking new industry. He reminded the group that a com-
munity as a potential industrial site would have planned for its
future needs, shaped a budget to finance those needs, and ex-
Public Addresses and Summaries
191
hibited a progressive attitude. Industries expected to pay their
share, but they wanted high-quality services in return. The Gov-
ernor discussed various factors which had to be considered by
communities. After he talked about labor, and the asset of in-
dustrial education centers; natural assets, such as water and agra-
rian resources; and a good highway system, Governor Sanford
stressed the need for long-term planning. He cited the Western
North Carolina Regional Planning Commission as a good ex-
ample of a group serving seventeen counties and their municipali-
ties. To bring to fruition the benefits of the multifaceted economy
of North Carolina would require hard work, co-operation, money,
time, and adequate community services. Sanford summed up his
idea by saying that "more goes into economic development than
industrial development and . . . more goes into industrial develop-
ment than merely seeking an industry." He expressed confidence
in this group and in the citizens of the state in their ability to
do the job.
LUNCHEON MEETING OF
NEW YORK CITY BANKERS
^ New York, New York
November 6, 1961
First Citizens, Wachovia, North Carolina National, First Union
National, and Branch banks sponsored a meeting in New York
at which Governor Sanford spoke. He discussed the significance of
banks in the continuing progress of North Carolina, commenting
on their role in such programs as traffic safety, industrial develop-
ment, and improved schools. Citizens were soon to vote on a $61.5
million bond issue, and North Carolina was aware of its AAA
bonds, expecting a ready market for them, but the Governor
asked the bankers to consider the state on its own merits rather
than merely on its financial standing. He reminded the audience
of North Carolina's good race relations, of its improved public
school system, of its cultural programs and institutions, of its
road system, of its agricultural achievements, and of its desire for
new industries and promotion of established businesses. Sanford
asked the bankers to judge North Carolina "on the basis of its
sound sense of responsibility, on its dynamic, aggressive spirit and
growth, and on its integrity and character." He expressed the
opinion that the bankers would find a state "which has in fact
made its way to the mainstream of America."
192
Papers of Terry Sanford
COLLEGE OF THE ALBEMARLE
DEDICATION AND INAUGURATION CEREMONIES
Elizabeth City
November 7, 1961
Governor Sanford, at the dedication of the College of the Albe-
marle, called education "vital ... to the national defense as well
as to the promotion of a better life for our people." He urged
North Carolina to provide educational opportunities appropriate
for each individual throughout his life. Reminding the audience
that the southern region had to catch up, Sanford said that North
Carolina had embarked on an exciting crusade to improve edu-
cational opportunities. He prophesied that the College of the
Albemarle would become increasingly important and that the
new college would carry people on the eastern seaboard "to a
future bright with promise."
NORTH CAROLINA STATE
SCHOOL BOARDS DELEGATE ASSEMBLY
Chapel Hill
November 8, 1961
Addressing the Delegate Assembly of the North Carolina School
Boards Association, Governor Sanford stressed the responsibility
of the group which had broad legal powers and which represented
"a powerful moral force." The fact that the people had the ulti-
mate responsibility for government in the United States, includ-
ing the responsibility for education, resulted in the American
system of lay boards of education. The boards worked as a part-
nership with the State Board of Education and also with local
citizens to carry out the job of educating children. Not being
fiscally independent in this state, the boards had to co-operate
with the boards of county commissioners who had the taxing
authority. It was the duty of the school boards to present the
needs of the schools to the commissioners and to the legislators to
assure adequate support for the public schools. Keeping those
groups and the citizens as a whole informed was one of the chief
functions of the school board members. The Governor stressed
the importance of teamwork, which involved teachers, students,
parents, and members of the boards. The members were respon-
sible for setting the tone for the educational program and for
Public Addresses and Summaries
198
establishing local policies. Each school board was called on to
"survey all school needs and chart a long-range plan for school
improvement." Governor Sanford called education the chief con-
cern of the people of North Carolina; he told the board members
that they were leaders and he expressed his trust in their ability
and willingness to meet their responsibilities.
TENTH ANNIVERSARY CEREMONIES
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA
SCHOOL OF NURSING
Chapel Hill
November 8, 1961
Governor Sanford commended those who had a role in develop-
ing the growth of the School of Nursing, a school which had
brought credit to the University of North Carolina and to the
state. He pointed out the need for sound preparation in social,
psychological, and public health fields as well as the need of
nurses for qualities of leadership, citizenship, and social develop-
ment along with professional training. The increase in population
would mean an expansion of health services. The fact that the
South's ratio of nurses to the population was the lowest in the
country was a matter of grave concern. Sanford reminded the
group of the facilities for training available in North Carolina.
He then discussed the School of Nursing in particular and de-
scribed attainments of this school. He congratulated the school
on the fine record of its first ten years and suggested that this
record "serve as an inspiration . . . [for] the tasks of the years
ahead."
NORTH CAROLINA RESOURCE-USE
EDUCATION CONFERENCE ^
Durham
November 16, 1961
Sanford reminded persons attending the Resource-Use Edu-
cation Conference that as resources were being depleted rapidly
and demands on those resources increasing, man's relationship
to his natural environment was jeopardized. Indecision, irrespon-
194
Papers of Terry Sanford
sibility, and a lack of vision meant that people were denying
themselves a wonderful bounty and imposing on future genera-
tions the prospect of a struggle for survival. A new, positive ap-
proach to the matter of resource-use would have to be developed.
He urged people to educate themselves in the complex field of
resource-use and conservation, defined as "an effort to maintain
and replenish the supply of resources we now need and use."
People being the most important resource, the Governor urged
that no effort be spared to develop the physical, mental, and moral
capabilities of rising generations. He called this a great challenge,
saying that success in meeting the challenge would mean that
future generations would enjoy the greatest prosperity in the
history of man. He credited this group with working to meet
that challenge.
NORTHEASTERN SOIL AND WATER
CONSERVATION DISTRICTS
Edenton
November 16, 1961
Governor Sanford began by reminding North Carolinians of
their "long and honorable record in the field of soil and water
conservation." The oldest conservation district in America, the
Brown Creek Soil and Water Conservation District in Anson
County, was organized in 1937. The northeastern districts were
founded in 1942. The Governor reviewed accomplishments and
explained the significance of the program. He reminded the
group that the state realized its responsibility in the field though
soil and water conservation district programs were in local hands.
In closing, Sanford emphasized North Carolina's responsibility
of using natural resources, not abusing them.
TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL MEETING
OF THE NORTH CAROLINA
FARM BUREAU FEDERATION
Raleigh
November 21, 1961
[Two weeks after the defeat of the state-wide bond proposals. Governor
Sanford took the opportunity to discuss needs of the state and to interpret
Public Addresses and Summaries
195
the political situation. He had received innumerable letters from North
Carolinians who expressed their feelings on the bond situation after the
election had been held. One woman wrote, "Don't blame yourself for the
outcome of the bond issue. You worked hard and sincerely for what you
believed to be for the best interest of North Carolina. You gave the issue
your best effort. If you want my autopsy report, the timing was bad, and
too many issues for one swallow— one spoonful of castor oil could be swal-
lowed before you know it (tax in this case) but you would know it before you
had downed ten. . . . Well, I pulled all ten of the 'for' levers— I lost— so
did you, and the State, but at least we live in a State that we can say what
we want to, without fear of reprisal— your popularity is probably at its
lowest ebb right now, but in six months it will be up again, and eventually
you will have been one of N. Carolina's great governors." On the other
side of the ledger, one person attached a newspaper clipping in which the
Governor expressed concern because of lack of facilities which would have
been provided had the bond issue passed. Commenting on the news item,
the citizen wrote, "But he evidently does not worry about the thousands of
children who go to bed hungry every night as a result of his Food Tax,
while HE gads around six days out of every week in a $200,000.00 airplane, 'sic
SEMPER TYRANNis.' "The Govcmor received a cash-register tape showing a
tax of 64 cents; on the back were the words, "This is one good reason I am
going to do all I can to help defeat any bond or taxes you try to get passed."
On November 10, 1961, the Governor received the following communication
which also brought in the matter of the state's plane, the "Kitty Hawk,"
which was used by the Governor and by other state officials:
OUR
NEW NEW
READER
SEE
SEE TERRY GO
GO GO go!
RIDE
RIDE, TERRY, RIDE
RIDE, RIDE, ride!
BLAH
BLAH, TERRY, BLAH
BLAH, BLAH, BLAHIII
HEAR
HEAR, TERRY, HEAR
HEAR, HEAR, HEAR!
FLY
FLY, TERRY, FLY
FLY, FLY, FLY
GIVE
GIVE TERRY PLANE
GIVE, GIVE, GIVE
196
Papers of Terry Sanford
PLANE
PLANE HELPS TERRY
HELPS, HELPS, HELPS
While this writer failed to mention the bond issue specifically, the person
obviously wrote to express his personal opinion of the Governor and his
program in the wake of the bond defeat. In his address to the Farm Bureau
Federation, Governor Sanford went into considerable detail as he elaborated
on his feelings of concern for the future of North Carolina.]
I want to talk to you a little this morning from the heart be-
cause I want to touch on this theme that you have for this pro-
gram, "Moving Ahead Together in '62." True, you furnished a
great part of the agricultural leadership in the past. But more
important than that, you must continue your leadership in all
segments of the forward march of North Carolina.
We are at a time of peril in America. We are at a time of oppor-
tunity in the South. And that combination of moving into our
opportunities in the South can help furnish the kind of leader-
ship which will enable America to remove the peril.
I know of no time, looking back over the broad sweep of the
history of America, when this nation faced greater difficulty, in-
cluding the time of the Revolutionary War. Never before has
the very existence of mankind been threatened as it is threatened
today. Never before has such a severe challenge been faced by
free people to live up to the demands and the responsibilities of
making democratic government strong and making it work.
President Kennedy has asked the question and sounded the
call to duty in asking the American people: Do we have the skill,
the nerve, and the will as a free people to make democracy strong
enough, to improve our leadership to the degree where we can
indeed save mankind, save the free world, and save American
democracy?
In our own part of the free world, are we going to do our part
to develop the scientists, to develop the statesmen, and to develop
the informed citizenry which America needs?
It cannot be done on any other level. We cannot look to Wash-
ington for it and should not look to Washington for it. We can-
not look to the United Nations for it, as important as is the UN
to world peace.
What is done to develop the kind of citizens who can make
democracy carry through under the greatest strains must be done
right here in North Carolina, by us, by you. You can furnish
the kind of leadership that we need. You can furnish the kind of
leadership that the free world must have. You already have fur-
nished that leadership, and I come before you today to express
Public Addresses and Summaries
197
my thanks and the thanks of a grateful state for the part that you
played as an organization, in setting the tone, in sounding the
call to arms, for the people of North Carolina to mobilize their
forces and their resources to do something about education. We
stand now in a position of leadership across the nation in terms
of what we are attempting to do to prepare free men and women
for leadership.
I think that you may take great pride in the fact that during
the days when there were many doubtful people, and during the
days when many people wondered whether we were attempting
to do too much, and during the days when people of little faith
did not quite have the courage to do the things that must be done
if we are to meet this test of leadership, this organization re-
sponded. And this organization cast its vote and its lot with the
education of the young people of the state.
Now out of that vote, out of that determination have come
many things, some negative and most positive. All across North
Carolina right now, in every local community, almost without
exception, people are moving toward the improvement of educa-
tional opportunities with a new morale and with a new vigor, I
believe, the like of which has never been seen in North Carolina
before.
People are determined that we can do the job. People are
proud of the fact that North Carolina sees this as a great mission
and that we are going to do something to prepare the young peo-
ple in this state who will make the state even greater than it has
been.
I thank you for what you have done because North Carolina,
indeed, is on the move and will, with your leadership, continue
to be on the move going forward together in 1962 and in all the
years to come.
Some bad things came out of the decision, as inevitably they
must. First of all, we knew that if we were going to do something
about schools and public education we had to start with the
fundamental problem. The fundamental problem is this: Just
this morning I was reading an advanced report that will be made
the last of this month to the Southern Governors concerning the
problems of education in our region. One set of statistics caught
my attention. We have known it, but here it is. This whole re-
gion of sixteen states needs around 55,000 to 60,000 new teachers
each year. We in the region are producing now around 40,000
teachers. That is, we are graduating 40,000 and all of them do
not go into teaching.
The fundamental need was to attract the attention of out-
198
Papers of Terry Sanford
standing students in high school and in college and direct their
interests toward the teaching profession. In other words, our
fundamental need was to get better people in adequate numbers
to come into the teaching profession and keep them there once
they became good teachers.
That was the fundamental need. The fundamental way to go
about it, we thought, and you agreed, was to make the teaching
profession more attractive, to give it a high level of dignity on
the local level, to make it the kind of thing that a young person
would seek with pride and seek with the satisfaction of knowing
that he not only would fulfill the desire to have a vital role in
his generation, in his time, in his state and country, but also
where he could be adequately compensated and could adequate-
ly provide for his family.
So the first need, among many, many needs all of which are
not yet met, was to increase the attractiveness of the teaching
profession. Now that can be done by you locally in many ways.
It can be done by more adequate facilities. It can be done by
just an attitude toward the teaching profession which cast it,
cast the teaching profession in the important role that it does
occupy in the future of the country.
It could also be done on the state level by increased financial
support. So as we analyzed and studied and thought about the
needs of education, one of the many things that had to be done
was an increased level of financial support for the teaching pro-
fession to reverse this downward trend where less and less teach-
ers were coming and start it moving upward so that we would
have tomorrow and in 1962, 1965, and 1970 an adequate num-
ber of teachers— well-qualified, confident teachers to do the job
that must be done.
In order to reverse that trend, the General Assembly of North
Carolina took the greatest forward step that has ever been taken
by a General Assembly in the history of North Carolina. They
voted the appropriations. They provided the foundation on
which you locally can build a better school system. They did
their job. And in doing their job, it was necessary to find addi-
tional money.
Now, that ought not to surprise anybody. It ought to be per-
fectly obvious that if you are going to expand a business opera-
tion, you must pay for it. If you are going to increase your stand-
ard of living at home, you must pay for it. If you are going to
extend your farming operations, you must make additional in-
vestments. So this General Assembly, knowing that it must make
an additional investment, faced up to the job and made that
Public Addresses and Summaries
199
additional investment in face of much opposition and much
criticism and a degree of unpopularity. It was a painful deci-
sion because I knew it would evoke bitter criticism from many
places across the state. It was a painful decision because I was
disturbed at one time that we could not muster enough support
to get it across, and if we didn't, of course, the whole concept of
the future greatness of North Carolina's educational system and
the future of North Carolina as based on education would fall
backward.
But I made that decision knowing that there would be many
months of unpopularity. I made that decision knowing that it
could not be a popular decision. I made that decision knowing
that there would be many people who would insist that we had
done wrong by the people of the state. But I made it, and the
General Assembly made the decision on the firm understanding
that we did not come to office merely to seek popularity. If that
had been the only mission in seeking office, then it wouldn't
have been worth the effort. If that had been our only guiding
light, then we would not have been worthy of the high office.
And, therefore, we decided that we would face the lack of
popularity and take it in our stride, confident in the long run
that the people of North Carolina would realize that this indeed
was the only step and this indeed had to be done if North Caro-
lina was to build to its future greatness. So we did take it.
The General Assembly, with great courage, did pass it, and
to your eternal credit this organization endorsed and supported
it from the very beginning; I admire your courage and appre-
ciate it.
The General Assembly also submitted a bond issue. I am hum-
ble enough to recognize that my own position and my lack of
popularity growing out of some difficult decisions might very
well have had something to do with the failure of those bond
issues. I think, also, that there were many other things that en-
tered.
But let's conclude for a moment that some people decided
that this would be a good opportunity to get even with the Gov-
ernor for things that he has done that they didn't like.
Now I have said before, and I reiterate here, that I do not
believe many North Carolinians would vote on the bond issue
and the future needs of the state for such a shallow reason. I do
not believe that they did.
But right now those people who would make political advan-
tage out of North Carolina's failure to provide these things are
making political sport in saying that this was because the people
\
200
Papers of Terry Sanford
of North Carolina did not like what had been done in this ad-
ministration in the past, particularly as far as the sales tax is
concerned.
They have come up with all kinds of letters to the editors
and all kinds of gossip back and forth in order to take political
advantage against the future needs of North Carolina.
Now what happens to me and what happens to any popular-
ity that in this office I might have is unimportant. But what
happens to the future of North Carolina, a decision for you to
make and leaders like you across the state, is extremely impor-
tant. And I would hope that we could clear aside, with your
leadership and with your talking to other people, any partisan
look, any narrow look at the future needs of North Carolina,
and that we could measure those needs and those requirements
now against the future greatness of North Carolina and not
against some petty dislike of the moment.
I have seen letters to the editor here in recent weeks that have
complained bitterly about the food and medicine tax and cited
that as the chief cause without bothering to look at the fact that
the legislature did not put any tax on medicine. But hardly a
day passes that a letter to the editor doesn't complain about the
tax that was not put on. Hardly a day passes that they do not
complain about some other part of the state government. Hardly
a day passes, and I might as well mention this to you, that they
do not complain about the airplane the state owns, which is
primarily used for the economic development of North Carolina.
While the insidious Republican leadership— and I speak of
the Republican leadership, not of the many Republican mem-
bers who did work and work enthusiastically for the passage of
these bonds— the insidious Republican leadership walked down
Front Street publicly announcing that they favored the building
of educational and institutional buildings, that they favored the
mental hospitals and meeting this humane need of the state, and
at the same time they circulated on the back street literature
which was misleading, which was false, and which gave an en-
tirely different picture in opposition to the very things that this
same leadership was proclaiming on Front Street.
I think that is carrying politics too far. I think that is taking
advantage of a partisan position attempting to damage your
opposition in a way that doesn't really damage the opposition,
but indeed, damages the opportunities of every child and every
person in North Carolina.
North Carolina has had too bright a history. North Carolina
has too great an opportunity to let that opportunity go down in
Public Addresses and Summaries
201
a mass of personal petty politics. And I hope that we can rise
above it. I hope that we can see beyond it, and where I am at
fault I earnestly promise to do my best to correct the bad situ-
ation.
We are attempting to meet the needs. We are attempting to
meet the responsibility, and I need your help if we are going
to be able to be successful. In North Carolina right now if we
do not do something immediately to provide opportunities in
the colleges and universities across the state, if we do not do some-
thing right now to provide dormitory space, the cafeteria space,
and classroom space, then your sons and daughters and your
grandsons and granddaughters are not going to be admitted to
college opportunities because in this state we simply will not
have enough facilities to provide for them.
And right now, in this state, we have young boys and girls
who have strayed from the proper paths, who are in the juris-
diction of the juvenile authorities, and who cannot be admitted
to our correctional homes because we simply do not have enough
space.
If you are going to do something about that, we are going to
need your help and your understanding and your leadership.
And we have in this state crippled children with defective
minds, with mental illnesses who are still on waiting lists, and
next year the waiting lists will be even greater, the following
year even greater because somebody measured the immediate
situation against the future needs and because we did not live
up to the responsibility to understand something about these
needs.
Now, I don't mean to be critical of the people who voted
against the bond issue. I am critical of myself, and I am critical
of other people in this state charged with the responsibility of
explaining these things because we did not do an adequate job.
But North Carolina cannot wait to build its colleges. North
Carolina cannot wait to build its mental institutions. North
Carolina must move now in this respect if it is to live up to its
great tradition and if it is to provide for its bright tomorrow.
In North Carolina over the years, in the darkest times, the
people have risen up and the people have always exhibited a
spirit of moving forward.
North Carolina stands in the forefront of the South right
now. It stands in the forefront of the South for many reasons,
going back to the same spirit of North Carolinians who had
faith in the future, who had vision to build and courage to do
those things now which might seem unpopular but which are
essential to the future of the state.
202
Papers of Terry Sanford
After the Civil War, when everything was torn all apart and
the pieces were strewed around, North Carolina was the first
in the South to pick up the call, to challenge greatness, to do
something about it.
Governor Aycock put our faith in education. Our faith has
been in education ever since that day. Our faith has been well
rewarded because North Carolina has marched to the forefront
of the South. The time has come when the South can move
to the forefront of the nation. The time has come.
Now we are celebrating the one hundredth anniversary of the
Civil War. To my way of thinking that centennial marks the
end of our being here in a little segment behind in so many
ways, economically, socially, and educationally, to other parts
of the country. That marks the time for moving forward. The
war is over. It has been over one hundred years. We have built
back. We have built back to a position of leadership in the
South.
The time has come for North Carolina to move and to seek
a position of leadership in the nation. It is not good enough for
our boys and girls to have the best education in the South. We
should see that that opportunity is the best in the nation.
We can do it! We've got the people. We've got the spirit.
We've got the resources. I am sure that we've got the courage
and the vision, and I know that we can do it with people like
you and if particularly you will assume this leadership.
We need your help. We must have it. And with it there indeed
will be no holding us back as we go forward together in 1962.
Thank you.
REPORT TO THE PEOPLE OVER
STATE-WIDE TELEVISION AND RADIO NETWORK
Raleigh
November 27, 1961
[Near the end of his first year in office, the Governor reviewed the accom-
plishments and the disappointments of his administration in a thirty-minute
report to the people. In his concluding minutes he elaborated on his deci-
sion not to call a special session of the General Assembly to consider a
new bond issue.]
I welcome the occasion at the beginning of the Christmas sea-
son, and at the end of a year's work, to talk about the forward
Public Addresses and Summaries
203
steps taken by the state of North Carolina. This is not, and
should not be, a time for false pride and boasting, but rather
a point in the course of the administration when we can meas-
ure what has been accomplished against the opportunities of
what can be done.
After the Civil War, when life was bleak, the future dim,
and all things in the South were torn apart, North Carolina was
the first to sound the bugle to start the march to greatness and
leadership.
Governor Aycock put our faith in education. Our faith has
been in education ever since. Our faith has been well rewarded,
for it enabled North Carolina to build back from the ashes of
war to new and greater opportunities. Never before have our
opportunities been as promising as they are today.
I want to call the roll of some of the progress made in North
Carolina in the past year pointing to some continuing oppor-
tunities.
In industrial development and expansion, North Carolina is
continuing to make dramatic headway. This year, North Caro-
lina led the South, and the South led the nation, in the per-
centage of industrial expansion. We are going full-speed to
continue to seek the right kind of new industry to provide the
right kind of jobs.
What does this mean? It means that 23,000 of you watching
or listening tonight will go to work again tomorrow morning
in a job which wasn't even in existence January 1. It means that
the 23,000 of you will earn $80 million this year in those jobs.
This has been done with work and seeing many people and go-
ing many places. The work continues. We have a working team
in Raleigh which is working with people across the state.
A further way to illustrate it is to note that each week since
this administration has been in office 515 new jobs have been
created for the jobless from new and expanded industry.
Let me say this to textile workers across North Carolina. I
know personally many of you who are now listening to this
program. I know how important your jobs are to you, and let
me tell you that they are extremely important to the whole state.
I couldn't report this to you before, but I have made several
trips to help protect your jobs. You can't expect increased wages
if you are dragged down by low-wage countries, and this unfair
competition has already cost us too many jobs. Just last week
the White House took the first real action to protect your jobs
that has been taken in ten years, and I am sure they are going to
follow through in other ways.
In the Budget Division, this administration has taken deter-
204
Papers of Terry Sanford
mined steps for economy. One of the reasons is that in this time
when so much of the national resource must go to national de-
fense, I am determined that we are going to do everything pos-
sible to demonstrate that new ways of economy can be found in
all levels of government. We have tightened our budget control.
We have smashed the racket of price-fixing in bidding for state
business. We are carefully examining every phase of the opera-
tion of government with a view to saving money.
In the Prison Department, we are doing some new things in
new ways. The first purpose of a prison is a place of punishment,
but there is a secondary purpose. You who have friends or
relatives or loved ones in prison can readily understand that
these people are in need of rehabilitation. We are attempting to
help every prisoner help himself through training and study and
a change in attitude. It saves money for the state; it helps the
prisoner to find his way to a proper and rewarding life.
I have been particularly interested in the alcoholic rehabilita-
tion program. We have provided the means for those who feel
the desire to stop drinking, and in most of the prison camps,
and ultimately we hope in all the camps, we will have a group
of Alcoholics Anonymous. In the brief time we have been carry-
ing on this program, we can already measure great success in
lives redeemed. Incidentally, 75 per cent of the people in prison
are there because of some connection with whisky.
We have concentrated the greatest single effort this year on the
public schools because this was the greatest single need. If we
are to build properly for the future of North Carolina, if we are
to have industrial, agricultural, economic, social, individual
growth and advancement, then our schools must be second to
none.
Our challenge is to give our children the best opportunities.
This does not mean that we expect every one of our children to
be a college scholar. It means that our projected program antici-
pates the needs of the retarded child, gives the average child a
wider choice, and provides the very talented child some extra
challenges.
The General Assembly had the vision to vote for a program
of school improvement for your children. The General Assembly
had the courage to vote the taxes from the only adequate source.
Let me say this to the mothers of children: I share with you
a desire to give your child the best opportunities in life. But we
cannot improve our schools by just talking about it. You and I
are doing something about it, and when you pay 15 cents on a
$5.00 basket of groceries, you may do so with confidence that you
are broadening the horizons for your child and all children.
Public Addresses and Summaries
205
What has been done in agriculture? There are so many op-
portunities in agriculture, which is the backbone of the economy
of North Carolina, that I could take the entire period talking
about what can be done and what is being done to improve farm
income across the state. Let me say to the farmers, improvement
of farm income has more far-reaching effect on the economy of
this state than any other single segment of income. All of our
ideas for the improvement of farm income have been tied up
now in one program known as "Agricultural Opportunities."
In this way each county has been challenged to define the ways
in which it might add to its income, joining with other counties
across the state in a massive effort to lift the farm economy. In
co-operation with Mr. L. Y. Ballentine of the Department of
Agriculture and Dean Brooks James, the School of Agriculture,
and the Extension Service at State College, and with other re-
lated agencies and organizations, I am satisfied that the state
has a vigorous program and will continue to do its share to
promote those things which will bring more money to the farmers
and through the farmers to the entire state.
In meeting our responsibility for helping children who have
managed to get in trouble, the state is broadening the scope of
its responsibility in the correction of the wayward child, having
just opened a new evaluation center at Swannanoa for determin-
ing the cause of delinquency and helping set straight those chil-
dren who come into the state system for correctional training.
In highway construction, we have stepped up farm-to-market
road program construction, without cutting down our primary
program. This was done by stopping diversion from the high-
way fund.
You who live on a muddy and dusty road, or have children
riding in school buses on narrow roads and treacherous bridges
are not forgotten. We promised to put the Highway Commission
closer to the people, and you probably have already seen a high-
way commissioner for the first time in many years. They have
been out riding the roads and talking to delegations. This
couldn't be started until July so we are just getting cranked up.
But we still have more than three years to go and you will wit-
ness a lot of improvement during that time.
When I came to office, I was determined to do something about
the terrible slaughter on our highways. The loss of life, the
injuries to thousands of people, and the extensive property
damage are inexcusable. We are going to apply the best energy
and determination we possess to reducing this awful loss. In addi-
tion to carrying on our official responsibilities, we have organized
with voluntary contributions the finest Safety Council in Ameri-
206
Papers of Terry Sanford
ca. I hope that we are going to be able to see progress in saving
lives, in reducing injuries, and with your help we can make the
most intensive effort of any state in the union.
Along with other accomplishments of a voluntary nature, such
as the Highway Safety Council, the Trade Fair should be listed.
This was a great success. It brought new business to the industry
of North Carolina. This required the energy and efforts of many
people on a voluntary basis, but their work paid off in the dis-
play of the diversified industrial might of North Carolina for all
the world to see. This not only indicated what is being done, but
more important, it indicates what can be done in North Carolina.
Another voluntary effort I must mention is the stay-in-school
program, which is being conducted by the state with the help of
the Optimist Clubs of North Carolina. This attempts to get at
the reason for dropouts, to meet the human and economic needs,
and to give the added encouragement, where necessary, to have
the student return to school.
These are some of the more than 100 such projects, programs,
and activities directly under the supervision of the Governor's
Office. In addition to these, there are as many more in which
the Governor participates. There are more than fifty heads of
boards, agencies, or institutions who report directly to the
Governor. During the past year, I have appointed and enlisted
in the service of the state more than 500 people who have
volunteered their services as members of the various boards and
commissions. In the many things required of the state adminis-
tration, government could not well function were it not for the
voluntary service of these people who contribute of their time
and talent to the progress of North Carolina. I am most grateful
that these people make their abilities available for the welfare
of the entire state and all its people.
Democracy is the best method known to man for providing
everybody a fair opportunity to express themselves. In a democ-
racy, there are always disappointments for some people. When
two candidates run for office, only one can win. When a proposi-
tion is put to the people, it either passes or fails. This is the way
democratic government operates. I not only have never quarreled
with this process, but I have fought to defend it.
It so happened that from the opinion I have of the urgent
needs, I thought that the recent bond issues should be approved.
I knew that failure of the bonds would mean your children and
grandchildren, even if qualified, might be denied a college educa-
tion. I knew failure meant your neighbor's crippled or deaf child
might have no place to go for training. I keenly feel these needs.
Public Addresses and Summaries
207
but even so, as I said on the night of the election, it is not for
me to quarrel with the decision of the majority of the voters.
It is my duty, however, again to call to the attention of the
people that we do have needs. These needs, if unfulfilled, could
damage the future of your children.
If we are to do our job in the correction of juveniles who have
strayed from the proper paths, then we need to expand our insti-
tutions so that juvenile judges desiring to send children to train-
ing schools will not be faced with long waiting lists and delays.
The longer the delay, the more serious the problem of correct-
ing the child becomes. We do not now have adequate facilities,
and to me personally, I believe this was the most disappointing
aspect of the bond election.
We need very badly improvements in some of the older build-
ings of our mental institutions if we are to provide the kind of
care which can return patients to normal life as rapidly as pos-
sible. This is not only the humane objective, but it has an eco-
nomic value because the sooner we can cure them, the less ex-
pense we will have in their maintenance. This need remains to
be faced and fulfilled, and along with it the need for more
adequate and extensive treatment for children who need the care
of these institutions.
I would go so far as to say that the air conditioning proposed
for the hospital ward where live the children with bodies so
crippled that they cannot move about, is one of the urgent needs
of these institutions. A visit to this ward during the months of
summer would convince anyone that this is in no way a luxury.
North Carolinians have always put their faith in education.
Historically, our ancestors provided for the necessities of life,
organized government, and then built colleges. In 1776, North
Carolina made provision in the Constitution that ''schools
[should] be established . . . and all useful learning [should] be
duly encouraged and promoted in one or more universities."
Thirteen years later it provided for the first state university.
Since these Revolutionary days. North Carolina has seldom
faltered. The schools, colleges, and university have always stood
high among the objects of public confidence, public appreciation,
and public support. The forward march of our society always
brings new problems. Our educational institutions face increas-
ing enrollment demands. They face demands for increased re-
search to improve agriculture, business, industry, health pro-
grams, and many other meaningful areas of society. It is clear
that our very survival in the world today demands that we re-
double our efforts in education. Indeed, the responsibility to ed-
208
Papers of Terry San ford
ucate is an inseparable part of our responsibility to guard and
advance the ideals of democracy. Further, if we neglect educa-
tion, we block our growth economically and industrially; through
education we open ways to agricultural, economic, and industrial
advancement that will improve our standard of living.
We have been benefited by the fact that the state-supported
institutions of higher learning and the Board of Higher Educa-
tion, in the lat^' fifties, developed a long-range building program
for our institutions, including the community colleges, for the
decade 1959-1969. This long-range plan demonstrated a need
for $89 million in construction over a ten-year period. It was
reviewed by Governor Hodges and the Advisory Budget Com-
mission prior to the 1959 session of the General Assembly and
again by them prior to the 1961 General Assembly. The 1959
session authorized the first step in this long-range program of
capital improvements. Over $22 million, $17 million by a bond
vote, in new construction and renovation projects was authorized.
The second phase of this long-range plan was approved by the
1961 General Assembly and submitted to the people in the bond
election on November 7.
This failure of bond approval means that the well-planned
program of expansion in higher education, to take care of antici-
pated growth, was interrupted on November 7. The require-
ments remain, and indeed have increased.
Three items show the increase:
1. This report estimated that we would have at least 72,000
students in North Carolina colleges, state and private, by 1969.
Right now, eight years ahead of schedule, we have reached this
number. And the most conservative estimate now for 1969 is
100,000 students. The state-supported institutions must take their
share of this increase.
2. High school enrollments increased by 18,000 students this
fall. A large percentage of these students will be seeking admis-
sion to college in several years.
3. Enrollments in state-supported institutions increased by
4,162 this fall, an increase of 11.3 per cent over 1960, and private
colleges experienced an almost equal increase.
It is necessary to understand that to plan for the future over
two years is required to construct a facility once it is authorized.
Building cannot be done overnight, so we must think and act
ahead of time in order to be ready for students when they are
ready for college.
Here, then, is a broad sketch of the immediate needs. I have
not mentioned them all, so to these add the parks, the forests,
Public Addresses and Summaries
209
and the ports; the test farms; the housing of archives, library,
and other functions; and the medical care program of local
hospital construction.
All of these things are important to you, and there is a degree
of urgency involved in each.
What can we do to meet these needs?
We could call a special session of the General Assembly and
submit the bonds, or at least the most urgent ones, to the people
again. Many leaders have recommended this course of action,
and I understand and value their reasoning and their desires. I
have given this decision my most sincere and careful attention
and thought. There is a good argument for calling a special
session right now, but there are also some reasons for not calling
a special session. The most compelling reason is this: It is not
in keeping with the soundest principles of popular government.
To call another election now would be to say that when a demo-
cratic election is lost, call another if you can. This would be a
bad precedent, it is haphazard, and this is not conducive to the
orderly processes of democratic government.
The people made the decision, and I will abide the decision.
The people made the decision, and the urgent needs must abide
the decision. Therefore, I will not call a special session of the
General Assembly.
This doesn't mean that there is nothing we can do to lessen
the ill effects of these pressing needs. There is much we can do.
I have already pledged to do the best possible in working with
what we have.
During the summer of 1962 the new Advisory Budget Com-
mission will travel to all of the state institutions, looking into
building requirements, and making decisions on a program to
be presented in the 1963 General Assembly.
Thus, through the orderly procedure established by our excel-
lent budget control act, we will again have a chance to present to
the General Assembly a program to be presented to the people.
In the meantime, we will stretch what we have as the demand
grows.
I have conferred with Mr. John Umstead and others on ways
we can do the best job possible with the mental hospital facilities
we have. We cannot expect to do the full job, but we will do the
best we can as applications increase beyond our present capacity.
I have conferred with the correctional training school people,
and we are trying to find temporary means of accepting some of
the juveniles; but we cannot expect to accept all who should have
this training.
210
Papers of Terry Sanford
I have conferred with college presidents. Meeting the needs of
students of college age will take extraordinary effort, because this
need is growing so much faster than anyone dreamed.
I suggest seven ways we can do something about higher educa-
tion requirements now:
1. The Advisory Budget Commission and the institution heads
will review the capital improvement projects to determine those
deemed absolutely essential for the biennium 1963-1965.
2. In order to speed up the program of construction, I have
asked the Department of Administration to seek ways now to
prepare plans and specifications of these needed facilities. This
will save valuable time if dormitories are ultimately approved,
and could enable us to make up as much as a year.
3. I now ask citizens living in the communities where our pri-
vate and public colleges are located to let college officials know if
they have any available rooming spaces in their residences that
students might use.
4. I shall work with the presidents of our state-supported insti-
tutions in every possible way to see if more can be done to accom-
modate this situation, and I particularly note and commend their
attitude expressed last week to "endeavor to utilize our present
resources wisely and efficiently."
5. I now ask our private institutions to review their situations,
looking to the possibility of accepting more students.
I promise to work closely with the leaders of private colleges
in making certain that adequate student loan funds are available
and in any way they might call on me for assistance. I would
remind many of you that if you have been contemplating a gift
to your favorite private college, now is the best possible time you
could make it.
6. I am requesting Mr. Irving Carlyle, the able chairman of
the Commission to Study Education Beyond the High School, to
accelerate the study of the program of higher education, since
these recommendations will be of great value in determining what
facilities we must have now.
7. I shall ask the presidents, faculty members, trustees, alumni,
friends, and students to join me in interpreting the facts concern-
ing higher education to the people of the state. It is important for
the people to know the truth about enrollments; research de-
mands to improve our farms, businesses, industries; research in
the health fields; the services rendered by our institutions to the
people.
This, then, is to say to you that all of those working in this
administration will do our best, and we will meet most of the
most pressing needs on a temporary basis. But to do so we will
Public Addresses and Summaries
211
need the help of every citizen who loves North Carolina and has
faith in her future.
There are many forward mc 'ing programs not affected by this
bond vote.
In these, which fortunately include the public schools, we will
continue to move with full force and vigor. We need your help
with these activities.
All of our problems come from growth and expansion and
progress. These are problems, but also expansion and progress
and growth are new opportunities. These are all around us. We
have many things to attract the energy, the devotion, and the zeal
of North Carolinians. We need your help in reaching for all of
these objectives.
In these areas directly affected by the bond program, we will
not falter in the face of a temporary setback.
It may indeed be difficult for the moment, but in the long run
we will in this way comprehend better our obligations to the
future. In the long run we will recover and we will eventually
fulfill these obligations. Indeed, in the long run, democracy is
always right. I trust implicitly the democratic process. The people
have spoken on this issue at this time.
But now on the broader issues let's speak louder than ever
in our spirit of progressiveness, in our determination to provide
the opportunities for every child born on earth to develop fully
all his talents for the benefit of himself and for mankind, in our
determination to provide a better chance for every citizen to make
a better living, in our determination to provide for the weak and
the ill, in our determination to take our proper place of leader-
ship as strong men and women in a frightened world.
North Carolina is on the move. The people of North Carolina
can do anything they want to do.
We need your help, each of you, in reaching out for the chance
that today belongs to North Carolina.
NORTH CENTRAL NORTH CAROLINA
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE
Elon College
November 29, 1961
In the sixth and last of the industrial development confer-
ences held in various sections of the state. Governor Sanford re-
viewed the problems and the opportunities of the area. An area
212
Papers of Terry Sanford
which represented "about the best potential in the South for
industrial development" was failing to utilize its resources of
people, water, good location within overnight distance of great
population centers, capital, and good local governments and local
organizations working for development. The Governor cited facts
to support his thesis that the area had not measured up. The per
capita income was low; people, particularly younger citizens, had
moved out of the area to seek employment. Though national and
state help was available, the local people were the ones primarily
responsible and the ones who had to work to see that there was
over-all improvement. Sanford advised the group that "You must
make industry want you." He reminded those attending the con-
ference that not only industry but also agriculture had not been
developed as fully as possible and that co-operative endeavor
would result in mutual benefits. In his concluding statements he
stressed the role of education in the picture, reminding his audi-
ence that education was a vital development resource which
should never be overlooked.
FIRST CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT
YOUNG DEMOCRATIC CLUBS RALLY
Nags Head
December 8, 1961
Governor Sanford recalled his election as president of the
North Carolina YDC in 1949. He said that the Young Democratic
Clubs of the nation were founded in North Carolina in 1928;
since that time, they had been "the trail blazer" for the party.
The Democratic party had "placed great accent on young people
and young ideas." Examples of young leadership since the Demo-
crats began "uninterrupted service to North Carolina" in 1901
and accomplishments under this leadership were remembered.
The Governor said that Democrats did not always agree, but that
the ties which bound them were far greater than the divisive
factors. He spoke of the Democratic party as a party of principles
and progress, re-enforcing his evaluation with a review of the
basic tenets and philosophy of the party. Sanford commented that
young Democrats like those at the rally would assure North
Carolina's progress with the Democratic party.
Public Addresses and Summaries
213
NORTH CAROLINA ANNUAL MEETING OF
TRAFFIC SAFETY COUNCIL
Raleigh
December 18, 1961
Sanford spoke of the magnitude of the traffic safety problem in
North Carolina. In 1960, 1,226 persons were killed, 26,947 were
injured, and economic loss was estimated at around |200 million.
He said the state realized its responsibility in this area, but in
spite of efforts in many directions, statistics of death and destruc-
tion continued to rise. The over-all responsibility rested with
the Governor's Coordinating Committee on Traffic Safety, made
up of state officials most directly concerned with traffic and high-
ways. The Safety Engineering Committee was studying traffic
accident localities and was seeking to improve highway engineer-
ing. Legislation to require motor vehicle inspection was needed,
and the courts would have to shoulder the burden of traffic law
enforcement. Governor Sanford commented that everyone agreed
on the goal of greater traffic safety, but the means to this end
were often disputed. He emphasized the need "to shoot at specific
objectives with careful aim, rather than just pulling the trigger
on a big blast and sitting back to hope it does some good." The
state should try to eradicate prejudice and listen to the advice of
professionals. He cited the use of seat belts as an illustration of
this point. Sanford concluded that traffic safety was not receiving
the public support it needed, making the need for the Traffic
Safety Council greater than ever.
NORTH CAROLINA
YOUNG DEMOCRATIC CLUBS MEETING
Statesville
January 6, 1962
Sanford again addressed the Young Democratic Clubs in 1962.
In this speech he illustrated the contribution of the Democratic
party by discussing several areas: Tobacco farmers were assured
an honest 90 per cent of parity and the over-all farm picture was
brighter; the textile industry had prospered with increased allow-
ance for depreciation provided by the Kennedy administration;
loosening of tight Republican money policies meant more new
homes under FHA; slums were cleared under the 1961 Housing
214
Papers of Terry Sanford
Act; Social Security covered more people than ever before; con-
servation practices were being carried out in the Appalachian
and Cape Fear areas. He said that the Democrats had proved that
progress could be made by going forward in school improvement,
mental hospitals, correctional institutions, and road systems. San-
ford reminded the YDC members that the biggest straw man of
the Republicans was socialism, followed by inflation, but that
the Republican answer to inflation was recession and depression.
Though Republicans had said, throughout the years, that the
Democrats were going to bankrupt the state. North Carolina's
credit rating was AAA. He promised that Democrats would con-
tinue to work to achieve full potential for North Carolina.
NORTH CAROLINA
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION
Greensboro
January 11, 1962
At the second annual meeting of the North Carolina Industrial
Development Foundation, Governor Sanford said the state had
just completed the largest year in history for industrial invest-
ments. The state's profits from industry were impressive. In
1961 businesses invested more than $279 million in new plants
in North Carolina, meaning new payrolls of over $117 million
and new jobs for 35,154 persons. Nationally, investments in new
plants were down about 3 per cent; North Carolina had an in-
crease of 18.5 per cent. Sanford said North Carolina sought new
industries to provide better opportunities for North Carolinians
to make better livings. The Governor asked for continued united
effort, pledging his administration to see that tax money was well
spent. He reminded the group that North Carolina was noted
for good, progressive government, and he cited examples to prove
the point. Despite the high grade of service, the state rated among
the lowest three of all the states in the amount of taxes paid per
person for state and local governments. In his final remarks, San-
ford observed that North Carolina's problems were those of
progress and growth and new opportunity.
Public Addresses and Summaries
215
MID-YEAR CONFERENCE
MARATHON CHAPTER NUMBER TWO
ORDER OF AHEPA
Charlotte
January 14, 1962
Governor Sanford described the organization to which he spoke
on this occasion as one dedicated to fellowship, progress, per-
petuation of human dignity and individual freedom and as one
which drew on the ideals of Greek traditions, such as free thought
and action. After expressing appreciation for the honor of being
selected the outstanding Ahepan of 1961, he discussed the roots
of democracy in the Greek heritage. He showed how Western
civilization was indebted to Greek civilization in democratic
theory, in Greek names, in architecture, and in other traditions.
He said that North Carolina was proud of its Greek citizens, and
the Governor emphasized the need of carrying on the Greek tra-
dition of democracy and citizenship.
MOORESVILLE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Mooresville
January 16, 1962
In speaking to this group of Mooresville citizens. Governor
Sanford observed that the expansion of industry in the local area,
through fuller use of natural resources, was typical of growth
throughout the state. He said that the North Carolina Trade
Fair of 1961 was designed to promote sales of Tar Heel products;
its success was evident when plans were made for a 1962 fair. The
Governor then specifically discussed textiles, the number-one
industry in Mooresville and the state. The state's textile mills
produced approximately half of the nation's entire hosiery out-
put, and nearly half of the American public used towels and
linens produced in North Carolina. Textile companies paid
approximately 17 per cent of all corporate taxes in the state;
about one of every two manufacturing employees was employed
by a textile company. The Governor then discussed federal
administration programs to help rejuvenate the textile industry;
he urged the citizens to rally behind the foreign trade program
in return. He ended with a reminder that challenges produced
opportunties, and that this part of "the free world has the talent,
216
Papers of Terry Sanford
the courage, and the determination to meet those problems and
achieve those potentials."
NORTH CAROLINA PRESS ASSOCIATION
Chapel Hill
January 18, 1962
After opening his address with a bit of sarcasm directed at the
press and a few jibes at his own public image, Governor Sanford
turned to a thoughtful reflection on the role of the press in con-
temporary society. Constructive criticism from the press helped
raise schools and raze slums, helped the poor, helped bring in
industry, and helped build new schools. The newspaper, "a daily
diary and a daily forecast for all of man's activities and all of his
world," naturally emphasized the dramatic and the controversial.
There were many stories, however, of equal significance though
perhaps less dramatic, on such matters as the results of the school
tax, on new industry, and on other aspects of state governmental
activities. The Governor expressed hope that many of these would
be written during 1962. He predicted that the state would have
problems but they would be problems of progress and growth
and opportunity; these, too, would be stories of sufficient interest
to be covered by the press.
. \.
FOURTH ANNUAL HIGHWAY CONFERENCE
Raleigh
January 30, 1962
[In a three-day meeting, persons concerned with highway building met
to exchange ideas, hear prominent speakers, and attend technical discus-
sions. Among other speakers were D. Grant Mickle, Deputy Highway Admin-
istrator for the United States Bureau of Public Roads, and J. M. Sprouse,
Director of Associated General Contractors of the Highway Construction
Division. In his address, Governor Sanford traced progress in the field of
transportation and then took the opportunity to support his faith in the
integrity of state government despite the basketball scandals and the irregu-
lar dealings in the Highway Department, troubles which had occurred
during the previous months. See statement on Burch-Brewer Case, January 7,
1962, pages 560-563.]
It is a pleasure to join personnel of the State Highway Depart-
ment, faculty members and students of North Carolina State
Public Addresses and Summaries
217
College's School of Engineering, and road builders in this
Fourth Annual Highway Conference.
On behalf of the state, I am happy to welcome all of the out-
of-town guests to this conference.
As I interpret the purpose of this conference, you are here to
develop and exchange ideas on how to give the citizens of this
state good roads at the most economically feasible price.
North Carolina has a long history of road building. Many of
you here today will recall that North Carolina bore the nickname
of ''good roads state" some time before many of our sister states
thought it was necessary to pave roads.
As a matter of fact, our good roads policy goes back to the
time of Revolutionary War. When President George Washington
made his tour of the southern states, shortly after his first election,
he rode in North Carolina on good roads.
One of the earliest long-range road planners of whom we have
any record in this country was a North Carolinian named Daniel
Boone. As you engineers know, there are superhighways today
along parts of the route he took west.
My only argument with Boone's long-range planning was that
he didn't stake off rights-of-way when he made his journey and
save us all of those costs today.
In the 1920's, when the use of automobiles was just getting
into high gear, Governor Cameron Morrison had the vision to
see that if North Carolina was going to grow and prosper she
would need good roads. So he, and later Governor Angus Mc-
Lean, proposed bond issues to link the county seats of our state.
That was an awesome task and it involved many millions of dol-
lars. Some critics thought those road bonds were paving the
way straight to the poorhouse. But you and I know that those
bonds were paving the route to a more prosperous citizenry.
In the forties, Governor W. Kerr Scott had the foresight to
recognize that if we wanted to build the economy of all the state,
we couldn't leave over half the state bogged down on muddy
roads.
Kerr Scott knew that if you provided all-weather roads to the
country, the farmer could get his produce to town to sell it. And
Kerr Scott knew that if the farmer got his produce sold, he would
buy the manufactured goods in the stores in town to haul back
to the farm.
Scott had the courage to propose a $200 million road bond pro-
gram to get the farmer out of the mud. And the citizens of North
Carolina had the courage to adopt that program.
Many of you will remember criticism of the Scott bond issue.
It was supposed to pave the way to bankruptcy. But it didn't. It
218
Papers of Terry Sanford
helped pave the route to the greatest era of industrialization we
have ever enjoyed in North Carolina.
Today those farm-to-market roads are among the strongest
selling points our state has. For the industrial employees can travel
those "Scott-tops" to their jobs in town every working day in the
year. And plants can be located away from congested areas.
North Carolina was ready in the fifties to get a running start
on the interstate highway system. Because we were ready, we were
able to translate the drawings of the drafting board into highways
in an expeditious manner. The motorists of North Carolina to-
day are driving on superhighways that were only pencil lines on
a map at the Highway Department a few years ago.
Now before any of you folks at the Highway Department start
asking for a raise and before any of you contractors start taking
bows, let me say that the taxpayers of this state are not going to
be satisfied until every mile and every foot of this interstate
system allocated to North Carolina is paved, and every shoulder
is built, and every detour sign is removed.
The job I have requires a lot of travel. And despite some sug-
gestions to the contrary, a lot more of my trips are made by car
than by plane. I believe I am speaking for all the traveling citi-
zens of North Carolina when I tell you that there is nothing quite
as frustrating as riding down a crowded two-lane highway month
after month and look across an island and see another two lanes
blocked off because they're not quite finished. I realize you some-
times run into rock. And I know the weather washes you out
from time to time. And I know there are 100 good reasons for
delay in building a highway the way it ought to be built. But there
are 1,907,988 good reasons to keep those delays to a minimum and
to get those roads open as quickly as good engineering permits.
Those 1,907,988 reasons are the number of vehicles registered
in our state. And I'm not even counting the backseat drivers of
those vehicles.
In 1961 this administration took a long, hard look at the
money available for roads in our state, especially money available
for secondary roads. We found that after we deducted all the
money we had to deduct to match federal road funds, and after
we deducted all the money necessary to maintain the roads we
already have, and after we made all the other deductions that are
necessary, we hardly had enough money left to pave a secondary
road from here to Hillsboro Street.
So the administration proposed, and the 1961 General Assembly
approved, measures to stop the diversion of highway funds. And
we shook loose some bookkeeping funds that hadn't been working
for us. As a result, the State Highway Commission intends to
Public Addresses and Summaries
219
pave more secondary roads this year than in any year since Ken-
Scott's road bond program.
This does not mean we are going to neglect our interstate and
primary system. On the contrary, we are going to spend approxi-
mately 10 per cent more on the interstate and primary system
than the average for the last two years. We intend to spend this
money where it is most needed and where it will do the most
good in developing the state of North Carolina. And let me say
with all the force of my command, that we intend for this money
to be spent without favoritism.
The state of North Carolina and the State Highway Depart-
ment have a deservedly high reputation for honesty and efficiency.
This reputation goes back over many, many years. And it goes
out to all the corners of this country.
The honest and hard-working employees of the State Highway
Department have built that reputation over the years— ever since
we started building roads in North Carolina. I am proud of them,
and I know the citizens of North Carolina, who are the employers,
are proud of them.
In recent years, a malignant idea has grown in our nation that
greasing a palm here and there is good business. This notion has
nothing to do with a particular political party. It's a disease that
threatens the great majority of honest and law-abiding citizens
who foot the bill. Sometimes it comes in the form of vicuna rugs
at the White House. Sometimes it comes in the form of a deep
freeze.
In recent years, this corrupt concept that everything can be
fixed has stretched its slimy paws up into the offices of some of
the largest companies in our country and resulted in price-fixing.
And it has stretched down onto the basketball courts of colleges
and resulted in point-fixing.
Last spring. North Carolina let it be known to everyone doing
business with the state of North Carolina that we were not going
to let the citizens of this state be cheated through price-fixing. Last
summer, we let it be known that we were not going to tolerate
the corruption of our sports. This month, we have said in as clear
a language that I know that this administration and this state
will tolerate irregular dealings neither on the roads of North
Carolina nor in any other departments for that matter.
That's not the way we do business in North Carolina.
State employees are honest and we are not going to jeopardize
their reputations or the reputation of the state.
The citizens of North Carolina pay into public funds for public
roads. And there are not going to be any under-the-table, or back-
street deals going on as long as this administration is in office.
220
Papers of Terry Sanford
The state of North Carolina and the State Highway Commis-
sion have a policy of spending public money honestly and care-
fully. Nowhere in our system of purchase and contracts or in our
low bid system or in our allocation of the taxpayers' money is
there a clause which mentions or implies that somebody's hand
should be greased.
Let me make it as clear as I possibly can: Companies doing
business with the state of North Carolina do not have to go
through influence peddlers. If a company goes through influence
peddlers, it will lose its business with the state of North Carolina
the day we catch them. The state of North Carolina does not do
business with fixers.
Any company that thinks it has found an "in" for getting the
state's business through a back door is going to find a little later
that it is barred from doing business with this state.
The state of North Carolina is going to protect its reputation
against any isolated case of irregularities.
And the state of North Carolina is going jealously to guard
every penny, nickle, dime, and dollar of the taxpayers' money.
Thank you.
SALEM CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ANNUAL DINNER
Salem, Virginia
February I, 1962
In speaking to the Salem, Virginia, Chamber of Commerce,
Governor Sanford took again the theme of education. He stressed
the responsibility of the state in the field of education, adding
that the state was well repaid for carrying out its responsibilities.
The economy was raised when the citizens were educated; the
ranks of unemployed were primarily from the group lacking
education. Sanford reminded the audience of Roosevelt's com-
mentary on the South as the number-one economic problem of
the nation. He said the South had worked to move forward, and
North Carolina was cited as an example of a state which had
succeeded in attracting new industry. Chambers of commerce,
governmental agencies, and others worked toward this goal, but
provision for training made by the state was a chief factor. Indus-
trial education centers provided technical skills, but the state was
also concerned for a broad education for its citizens. Sanford said
that education was fundamental for long-range economic develop-
ment and was also vital for short-range goals. Education was
Public Addresses and Summaries
221
essential if the income of the South was to rise. He concluded
with a definition of education as "the golden door to liberty and
opportunity."
TEMPLE EMANUEL BROTHERHOOD MEETING
Greensboro
February 2, 1962
As part of the observance of Brotherhood Week, Governor
Sanford commented that nearly all religions subscribed to a be-
lief in the ultimate aim of universal brotherhood. He added that
men had compromised their beliefs by relying on themselves
rather than God, that the ideal of brotherhood still existed
though its application was hard. Governor Sanford called on the
people to draw on their heritage for courage and inspiration, say-
ing that the United States was founded on brotherhood and the
belief of responsibility to one's fellowmen. Brotherhood Week,
1962, offered a challenge to meet the goal of universal brother-
hood.
GRANVILLE INDUSTRIAL DEDICATION DAY
Oxford
February 6, 1962
The Governor spoke in Granville County on the occasion of
the etablishment of two new plants: JFD Electronics-Southern
and Outdoor Supply Company, Inc. He commended the local
citizens for their initiative, adding that promotion and work un-
dertaken by state government in Raleigh existed because of local
needs and wishes. He pointed out the inability of state govern-
ment to educate a million children, to grow agricultural products,
and to perform other tasks needed by the people. What the
government could do was provide texts and teachers, supply the
results of research from laboratories and offices, and give assist-
ance in many fields. Attracting new industry had been a joint
local-state project; new plants, new payrolls, and a better economy
resulted. Sanford commented that North Carolina had extended
advantages to all businesses: an excellent climate; a tax structure
of equality; a labor market made up of efficient and hardworking
employees rather than cheap workers; a good place to live, with
222
Papers of Terry Sanford
its educational program, mental health hospital system, credit
rating, and transportation facilities. North Carolina, a good place
to work and a good place to live, welcomed the two new industries
locating in Granville County.
NORTH CAROLINA CITIZENS COMMITTEE
FOR BETTER SCHOOLS
Raleigh
February 22, 1962
As he had done many times before and would do repeatedly in
the future. Governor Sanford spoke on the subject of education,
which he called "the chief weapon in the arsenal of democracy.
. . ." He observed that ignorance and freedom did not go to-
gether, that improvement in public education was, therefore, the
primary goal of his administration. He applauded members of
the General Assembly who had carried out the wishes of the
people for improved educational opportunities and had voted
funds to support the program. With additional financial support,
improvements had been made and were being made. The Gov-
ernor advocated a conference on education in every county during
1962, with as many people as possible in attendance. He told the
North Carolina Citizens Committee for Better Schools that cer-
tain areas belonged to the professionals and others to the laymen.
In closing, he stated, "What our schools are today will determine,
in large measure, what our people will be tomorrow."
TO STUDENTS OF NORTH CAROLINA
OVER STATE-WIDE TELEVISION
Raleigh
March 1, 1962
[Governor Sanford many times observed that the ultimate success of the
quality education program lay in student hands. In this television address
to the students of North Carolina, he spoke to more than a million young
people, explaining to them their opportunities and obligations under the
quality education program enacted by the 1961 General Assembly. The
"folksy" language used in this talk was typical of the many short speeches
Sanford made to school children; this speech easily shows how he was able
to establish rapport with his young audiences.]
For some time I've wanted to get all of you together, all of the
Public Addresses and Summaries
223
students of the state. I want to talk to you. And I hope you'll
remember as I talk that you form a complex audience. Some of
you are in high school and think like adults; others of you are
little tots just starting out. You are varied company, not only in
ages, either. You come from fishing families down on the coast;
maybe a few of you spent last Saturday on a trawl boat. Others
of you are from the cities, where your fathers might work in
factories or in offices or might keep the streets safe and clean.
Many of you are from the country. Your parents grow tobacco
or livestock or maybe goats, as does Mr. Carl Sandburg up in
the mountains.
You are of different religious faiths. You are of different races.
Some of you live in rich houses, some of you don't. Some of you
are Indians— did you think of that? So you see what sort of audi-
ence you are. Indians and non-Indians, you're all members in
good standing of the student population of our state.
And you're just about the most important part of all because
the future belongs to you, and the future— the future of you, our
children— is our most valuable possession.
My purpose in talking to you tonight is to tell you about the
things you can do to help in North Carolina's program of educa-
tion, because that is our future.
Why, all of a sudden, are we talking so much about education?
What is this "quality education" you've been hearing about?
Is this something new? Is this something we haven't had before?
As a matter of fact we have had a comparatively good school
system across the state since the days of Charles Brantley Aycock
and an excellent school system in some counties.
But now as never before, education is becoming more and
more esssential. Because it is more important than ever before,
everybody is working to make it more effective.
I'd like to think with you about your future. I want you to try
to get a picture of it in your mind. It won't be easy to see the
future. It wasn't at all possible for me, when I was a boy in
Laurinburg, to see the future well. For example, when I started
school we didn't have television. Not only did we not have it, we
didn't even believe it. If you had told me about television, I
would have thought you were trying to be funny. When I started
school there were very few electric refrigerators. We bought our
ice from an ice wagon which was drawn by a horse. In hot
weather your mother would buy 10 cents worth of ice, unless
you had company and iced tea and then you bought an extra
nickle's worth. I thought this was the way it would always be,
that the future would always have ice wagons in it.
Back then there wasn't so much danger of being run over by a
224
Papers of Terry Sanford
car, either. There weren't many cars. To get from Laurinburg
to Winston-Salem was quite a trip, and to go as far as Asheville
was a journey, and going as far as Memphis, Tennessee, wasn't
even talked about. I remember writing a theme about the great
progress of mankind after completing an automobile trip to
Maxton and back— twelve miles.
But there has been at least one miracle performed every year
since I started the first grade. And just the other day our country
sent a man around the world. He went around the world three
times in less than half a workday. It's impossible, but it's so. Be-
fore long somebody will be going to the moon. Some of you will
go and see what the man in the moon looks like from close up.
Maybe you can explore Mars and see what Venus has on it, or
go on into the distant universes. It's true. Yet I never could have
foreseen it as a boy. I remember when the comic strip Buck Rogers
first came out. It showed a rocket ship circling the earth, and
nobody that I knew believed it.
We know now that your future will be full of miracles. How do
you prepare for a future like that? How can you get ready for
1980, or for 2010? The only reasonable answer is to advise you
to stock up now on education.
That means readin', writin', and 'rithmetic, among other things.
An elderly man told me years ago that those three were all a
person needed. This was possibly true when he was a boy. He
had a nice big farm and a happy family. The family had most of
what it needed there at home. The cloth was made from cotton,
or linsey-woolsey, made from wool and linen. They had droves
of hogs. They had big mules to pull the plow. They had a buggy
to drive to worship in or to go to town to fetch salt or sugar or
coffee. Their life was well ordered. They did what others had
done before them, and about the most change that ever happened
from day to day was the change that came in the weather.
But now our times have changed, haven't they? And you'll need
to know readin', writin', and 'rithmetic, but you'll also need to
know more. Unlike that old gentleman, and unlike the time when
I started to school, you happen to be living in the most rapidly
moving, fastest changing, complex age the world has ever known.
That makes education— in many fields, and about many things-
more necessary than ever before.
Maybe you're interested in sciences and engineering. They've
become a big part of our world, and they'll be important in yours.
Many of you little children know how to turn a television set on.
It seems to me that there's not a child in the state too young to
learn that. But how do you suppose the set works? How does my
Public Addresses and Summaries
225
picture get on your screen? How does my voice get into your
set? The answers are in the sciences.
How does your father's car or truck work? You can sit in the
front seat and see that the pedals are pushed and the steering
wheel is turned, but you know as well as I do that foot pedals
and a steering wheel don't make much of a car. You have to know
engineering to make a car.
Or how is a book printed?
Or why is it that the doctor can put a spot of liquid on your
arm and keep you from getting smallpox?
How is it that an X-ray machine can see through your clothes,
and right through your skin, and take a picture of your lungs, so
that a man trained to do so can tell you if you have TB?
How is it that a building can be made forty stories high and
stay put? Try sometimes to set forty blocks on top of one another
and see if they stay.
Think about your house. Most of you have electricity in it.
What is that? How did it get there? How does it make machinery
work?
Farming is another profession you might be interested in, scien-
tifically tending to the cattle and the crops, raising chickens and
pigs. In that case, you surely need a sound education. Farming has
become a complicated procedure. Farmers tell me that they feel
like chemists part of the time. They have to buy their chickens
special tablets and drops. They have to get their soil tested and
buy the fertilizer prescribed for it. There are sprays for insects
and poisons for rodents.
There are many other types of jobs, of course. You might want
to go into business. Well, you'd better get an education, hadn't
you? You might want to operate a grocery store; better get an
education. Do you see how far the supermarket has changed from
the little country stores? Do you think they've stopped changing?
No, chances are that stores will change more in the next twenty
years than they have in the last twenty years. How will they be
different? I don't know. They'll be different in the ways edu-
cated men and women make them different. And if you want to
run a store, you'll need to be an educated man or woman.
Some of you will want to be teachers. Some of you will want
to be religious leaders. Some of you might want to work on the
railroad. Well, you'll need to know as much as you can grasp and
contain. And let me say this to you, that I hope you will settle
on a high ambition for yourself, on a good one. You have a right
to dream of playing a special part in our country.
Our schools will train you to go to college if that is what you
want to do. I hope you will. Not enough of our boys and girls
226
Papers of Terry Sanford
with great ability go on for advanced training. Why not? If you
have the ability and the ambition you can go to college. Don't
let anyone discourage you. In North Carolina our schools will
help you find a way. We don't want you to waste your talents.
But our schools aren't limited by any means to training people
for college. We are trying to develop the kind of program which
will train you for life. There is no reason in the world why you
should finish school and face life without having a skill that will
enable you to earn a better living. If you've got the ambition,
we've got the school. If you can't get it in your local school, you
can go on to our industrial training centers, a part of our school
system.
Our purpose is to say to every boy and girl, "What is your am-
bition? What do you want to do?"
And our answer to your response is, "We can help you do it."
Do you want to be an automobile mechanic, a practical nurse,
a welder, a dental assistant, a machinist, a space scientist, a lab
technician, a better farmer, a chemist, a bookkeeper, an electrical
engineer, a surveyor, a teacher, a veterinarian?
We can provide the training for these and a thousand other
occupations. But you have got to provide the ambition. You have
got to provide the "get-up and go."
Make up your mind that you are not going to drift through
life, that you are going to develop your skills and your mind. If
you do, we can help you. Talk to your teacher, or principal, or
counselor. Pick a career.
If you are out of high school, or didn't quite finish, it is not
too late to make a new start. Perhaps you have an older brother
or sister who dropped out. Talk to him or her and say that we
have the means of providing training if he or she will provide the
ambition.
If you can't find out locally what you need to know, write to
me.
I am personally interested in every young person in this state,
and I say to you that there is no reason for anyone not to be
trained in a skill. This is our program. This is our goal. There is
no place for unskilled labor tomorrow, and today is the time to
learn.
Thomas Wolfe once said that we should give every man his
chance, his shining, golden opportunity to work, to be himself,
and to become whatever thing his manhood and his vision could
combine to make him. He said this was the promise of America.
And so it is for all of you, rich and poor, girl and boy, white and
colored of this state. Maybe you haven't been taking seriously
your school up to now. It's time you did. I don't mean school
Public Addresses and Summaries
227
should be a burden. It shouldn't, but don't sell yourself at a
bargain counter. Get a goal in mind and work toward it, prepare
yourself. Sharpen your ax keen. One thing we can all say about
the future. The only ax that's going to cut a thing is going to
have to be keen.
I'd like to go a step further with you, not to talk about other
jobs, but to say another word about education. Schooling isn't a
matter of jobs only. Schooling joins with your parents and your
community and religious leaders to help you become a productive
person in your own right. And you as a person, and you and the
family you will have someday, are of major consequence. And so
is your relationship with the community as a whole.
The communities we live in today have widened and enlarged
themselves. We travel faster now. In a sense, science has brought
all of us closer together and into a community. Thirty years ago
Asia wasn't much more than a romantic word; today products
made by Asiatic workers are trying to compete with products
made in North Carolina, competing not only in Asia, but in this
country, and even in this state. Time was when a plague might
strike a country, and we wouldn't even hear about it until it was
over. Today we hear about it a few minutes after it's detected,
and we can fly medicine to the place, if we choose to, if we want
to save lives.
The Bible teaches us to love our neighbors. It teaches us to
love even enemies, too, which is asking more than some of us
seem to be able to deliver. We live in a time when almost all of
the world's people are neighbors, in a sense, and when many of
them are enemies. This is so today, and in the future it is likely
to become even more important, as we are brought even closer
together in a community.
Some people are afraid of this association. They don't want to
get involved in other people's affairs, or to have others telling
us what they think we ought to do. They suggest we withdraw,
pull back. What they haven't told us is where we are going to
withdraw. In effect, they are saying that they prefer the olden
days to the atomic age, that they had rather have the ice wagon
than rocket power. I can understand their view, and so, I'm sure,
can you. But you probably can understand, too, their faulty
thinking. We cannot abandon the rocket world, even if we wanted
to, and there are no ice wagons.
Well, we're going into this new age. We have no choice about
that, and how do we get ready for it?
I know many of you are studying a foreign language. Please
learn it well, and if you have the courage and mind for it, learn
two.
228
Papers of Terry Sanford
Some of you are studying the literature of other peoples. Absorb
as much meaning from it as you can. Literature helps us under-
stand a people.
Many of you are studying world history. Please come to grips
with it intelligently. You are going to need to know it long after
you have finished the course, if you are to participate intelligently
in the affairs which are ahead for us all.
I know you are studying American history. Study it carefully.
Consider its spirit and its power. Our Declaration of Independence
was the first clear call to freedom sounded by a nation's leaders;
it began a revolution which has spread throughout the world,
and the echoes of it still reverberate in this country, in this state,
and they are coming back to us from other places.
I know many of you are studying North Carolina history. I
recommend that, too. Let me tell you about a few men in that
story. There's William Davie,^^ who founded our state university.
Before that, he was a cavalryman in our Revolution. With a
handful of men he stood at the crossroads of the little town of
Charlotte and held at bay for more than a day the entire army
of the British General Cornwallis.
Another man is Archibald Murphey,^^ who came later. We
were a poor state in a new struggling country, and in the early
part of the nineteenth century, Murphey begged us to make
better roads, to build canals, to begin educating our children.
But he was rejected, and the state languished in deeper and
deeper poverty. We become known as the "Rip Van Winkle
State."
But once we reached the twentieth century, we found such men
as Charles Aycock, and for the four years he was governor a
school was built every day. Other men made our roads, opened
our harbors. So in our century North Carolina has moved into
the forefront of the South and has attracted the admiration of
the country.
Yes, study the history of North Carolina. It has some sad
stories in it, but there's good spirit and plenty of hope in it, too.
And seek to grasp the feelings of poetry, of music, of paintings,
William Richardson Davie (1756-1820), Revolutionary soldier, early statesman;
Governor of North Carolina, 1798-1799; called "father of the University of North
Carolina" for his many efforts on behalf of that institution. Crabtree, North Caro-
lina Governors, 56-57.
^Archibald Debow Murphey (1777-1832), statesman and lawyer from Hills-
borough, teacher at the University of North Carolina; state senator, 1812-1818;
champion of internal improvements, universal education, and constitutional re-
form. Samuel A. Ashe and Others (eds.) , Biographical History of North Carolina:
From Colonial Times to the Present (Greensboro: Charles L. Van Noppen, 8 vol-
umes, 1905-1917) , IV, 340, 348, hereinafter cited as Ashe, Biographical History.
Public Addresses and Summaries
229
of the best plays and writing. Through such achievements we
come face to face with the best, most sympathetic understanding
of ourselves. And it's through such achievements that we are
able to present ourselves to others.
So I recommend to you that all of us learn to communicate
better what we are and believe, and that we learn to listen
intelligently to others, so that the community of mankind will
have in your time its greatest flourishing.
You see there is quite a bit to do and to learn. I'm urging you
to become educated men and women. I'm counting on you. So
were the 170 men and women who met here in Raleigh last
summer. About the time the weather was getting sticky hot, when
you were out playing baseball or drinking sodas at the drugstore,
they were here working for you. They were your state legislators,
and they were involved with certain problems in arithmetic. For
example, they were asking why our state was forty-fifth in the
amount of money spent for each student.
Also, they were asking why it is that we were forty-first in the
size of our classes. The more students a teacher has, the harder
it usually is to teach and learn. Our classes in North Carolina have
been too big. They asked why North Carolina almost leads the
nation in the number of men turned down by the armed forces
because they can't read or write, even well enough to be buck
privates.
The 170 men and women in Raleigh decided the state could
afford to sacrifice enough money to solve these problems. They
did their part. They put a great deal of money into a new
program of education for you. And our state now hopes to rise
toward national leadership.
Many people have worked and are working to improve our
schools.
This work by the legislators, the teachers, the parents, the
county commissioners, the State Department of Public Instruc-
tion, the principals, the superintendents, the school boards, the
Curriculum Study, the taxpayers, the State Board of Education,
is done for you. It is all going to be wasted work if you don't
take advantage of it. The whole key to all this effort is you.
What have you, the student, to do with achieving quality edu-
cation? I say to students that quality education is not something
that you get out of a box, ready mixed. It is not something that
is going to be given to you. It cannot be said to students, "Here
it is. Now come and pick it up." Quality education stems from
the fact that we have earnest students who want to learn. Unless
there is a desire on the part of the student to learn and to take
advantage of the opportunities and the teaching that we hope
230
Papers of Terry Sanford
to continue to move up in quality, then we are not going to
have any quality education.
Unless students work at it, unless you want to learn, there'll
be no quality education for you. If you do want to learn, i£
you are sincerely trying to prepare for the opportunities in life,
then all the rest of us are working to improve the chances of
your being properly prepared.
But it doesn't make any difference how well the superintendents
and principals plan, it doesn't make any difference how much
harder the teacher works, there will be no quality education
for you unless you want it and unless you are willing to work
hard to get it.
Your fathers and mothers and the other adults of North
Carolina are paying more taxes so you can have better educational
opportunities. We have set as our goal giving you educational
opportunities as good as any enjoyed by any children anywhere
in the nation. We have done this because there is no reason
that North Carolina boys and girls should not have the best.
We cannot move North Carolina to the forefront of the
nation unless we have everybody working together.
You know in the western part of our nation there is a large
desert. As you approach the desert in your car, you drive by signs
which warn you: "Last chance. Last chance for gas and water."
If you fail to heed these, you may find yourself in trouble in the
middle of the desert. Well, that's the way it is with what you are
doing now in school. This is your last chance to get the education
you will need in the world that lies ahead— not just to make
money, but to be a good citizen in this complicated world.
There will not be another chance. Now is the time. The school
is the place.
We need teachers who will work harder to do a better job,
and we have these. We need to continue planning and working
in the Board of Education and the Department of Public Instruc-
tion, and we are. We need legislators and county commissioners
who are willing to pay the price, and we have them. We need
citizens who are willing to support the future through edu-
cation, and we have them. We need parents who will take an
active interest in the education of their children. Most of all,
we need you. In the final analysis, it is your reaction that tells
us how well we succeed.
Talk it over in your home room tomorrow. I'd like to have a
letter from your class telling me that you understand what we are
doing, that you believe in it, and that you want to be a part of
our efforts, that you want to join our crusade to make North
Carolina's school system the best in the world.
Public Addresses and Summaries
231
If you are willing to take part, you will be starting right now
doing your part to defend the nation, to carry the banner of
freedom and human liberty, to promote world peace, and to
move North Carolina to its greatest days.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING OF THE
NORTH CAROLINA TRAFFIC SAFETY COUNCIL, INC.
Greensboro
March 15, 1962
This meeting, Governor Sanford reminded the audience, repre-
sented the first anniversary of the Traffic Safety Council and was,
therefore, a good time to take stock. A comparison of figures
released by the Department of Motor Vehicles for 1961 and 1960
was shocking in that it showed an increase of twenty-eight deaths
and an increase of 7,485 injuries. The Governor said the public
was concerned, and for the first time the state had a co-ordinated
attack planned. Though on the right track, the program could
take years to mature. Sanford placed the courts "on the front
line of this struggle" as he launched into a discussion of traffic
problems and the court amendment under consideration. Despite
the existence of hundreds of conscientious judges and solicitors,
the court system was called the weak link in the traffic safety
chain. The trouble stemmed from the inability of the courts "to
cope with both the volume and the intricacies of automobile
litigation." The tendency of some thinkers to feel that the courts
should deal sternly only with problem drivers overlooked the
fact that everyone was a "problem driver" at one time or another.
Attitudes should be developed but the right attitude would not
substitute for the administration of justice. Governor Sanford
urged the Traffic Safety Council members to expend as much
of their resources as possible on the passage of the court reform
amendment.
EIGHTY-FIRST ANNUAL MEETING OF
THE NORTH CAROLINA TEACHERS ASSOCIATION
Raleigh
April 12, 1862
Speaking to many of the state's Negro educational leaders at
their meeting in Raleigh's Memorial Auditorium, Governor
Sanford presented a vivid and perceptive study on the qualifi-
232
Papers of Terry Sanford
cations of a good teacher and the meaning of good teaching. He
reminded the group that money could not do the entire job and
that good teaching was the prime requisite to the achievement
of quality education. He gave several definitions of good teachers
and quoted a number of outstanding men from John Locke to
Henry Steele Commager on the subject of education and teach-
ing. The Governor ended with an expression of confidence in the
members of the teaching profession in North Carolina.
NORTH CAROLINA CREDIT UNION LEAGUE
Raleigh
April 14, 1962
Since the enactment of the North Carolina Credit Union Act
in 1915, credit unions contributed toward a higher standard of
living for thousands, the Governor told those who attended the
Credit Union League. He reviewed briefly the history of credit
unions and then discussed financial stability of the state, stressing
the importance of fiscal soundness for a government and for an
individual. He gave statistics to show the strong financial position
of North Carolina and concluded by urging citizens to move
ahead with confidence in themselves and in the future of the state.
INAUGURATION EXERCISES LUNCHEON
GARDNER-WEBB JUNIOR COLLEGE
Boiling Springs
April 16, 1962
The occasion for this speech by Governor Sanford was the
inauguration of Dr. Ernest Eugene Poston as the new president
of Gardner- Webb Junior College. His address dealt with the
challenge of higher education in society. As he frequently did,
the Governor emphasized the importance of education. Where
citizens had the right to vote, a literate people was vital. He said
that elementary and high school were, at one time, sufficient,
but increased knowledge of mankind meant the need to teach
more and more subjects. It was impossible for all of them to be
taught in high schools. With opportunities limited, the Governor
urged a partnership between private and public institutions.
The progressive heritage of Gardner-Webb was indicative of the
Public Addresses and Summaries
233
important role the school would play, and the Governor con-
cluded by expressing appreciation for the contributions made by
this college and its leaders.
CONFERENCE ON FOOD PROCESSING
AND MARKETING
Raleigh
April 17, 1962
Sanford reviewed progress made in North Carolina in the
area of food processing and marketing, commenting on such
endeavors as the establishment of the Department of Food
Science and Processing at State College. He said that North
Carolinians were realizing the importance of every phase of the
food industry: production, processing, packaging, marketing,
management, and research. The state offered practically limit-
less agricultural potential which, matched with business vision,
intelligent leadership, hard work, and close co-operation, could
result in a successful food processing operation. He offered sug-
gestions as to ways in which the processing dollar could be kept
in North Carolina, but he stressed the requirement of high
quality as being essential in the endeavor. To meet the challenge,
the state needed experts in packaging and processing. With the
native products produced in the state. Governor Sanford said
there was no reason why North Carolina could not become a
leader in the new field.
DINNER HONORING JOHN W. UMSTEAD, JR.
Chapel Hill
April 18, 1962
Speaking at a dinner in honor of John W. Umstead, Jr., Gover-
nor Sanford expressed appreciation for Umstead's many outstand-
ing contributions in the roles of businessman, trustee, politician,
legislator, and chairman of the Hospitals Board of Control. This
leader gave priority to mental hospitals; as a result of his efforts.
North Carolina's mental hospitals and training schools were
highly esteemed throughout the nation. Umstead finally proved
that investment in mental hospitals paid rich dividends to the
state. He also worked tirelessly for the cause of education and
234
Papers of Terry Sanford
academic freedom. Governor Sanford commented that Umstead
represented in his many programs people all over the state in all
walks of life.
SAVINGS BOND MEETING
Raleigh
April 19, 1962
Governor Sanford, speaking in the Senate chambers in the
State Capitol, favored the purchase of United States savings
bonds. He said that the bonds helped finance John Glenn's flight
into space, the ''Nautilus" trip under the North Pole, the winning
of World War 11. He added that bonds were then helping pro-
vide for this country's obligations in trouble spots of the world,
and he encouraged the purchase of bonds as a way of fulfilling the
duties of citizenship and investing in the future at the same time.
State government encouraged the purchase of bonds through the
Payroll Savings Plan; the press, radio, and television personnel
had co-operated by giving free advertising to the program which
had a goal of 17,000 savers in 1962 in North Carolina.
DEDICATION OF
U.S.S. ' NORTH CAROLINA" MEMORIAL
Wilmington
April 29, 1962
The Governor thanked those who made this occasion possible.
To show appreciation, the state and the Battleship Commission
pledged their best to make this the greatest World War II me-
morial in the United States. The drive to bring the ship to North
Carolina was successful, and the "North Carolina" was condi-
tioned for public display. The Governor told of plans for land-
scaping, parking lots, and other facilities which would be made
possible by donations and by garden clubs. He said the Battleship
Memorial Museum would catch the imagination of the state and
of the nation, that exhibits would tell the ship's history which
would also be the history of the offensive war in the Pacific.
Sanford called this the chance to preserve North Carolina's most
historical link with World War II, concluding that the prospect
awaiting Tar Heels was an exciting one.
Public Addresses and Summaries
235
NORTH CAROLINA CONFERENCE
FOR SOCIAL SERVICE
Raleigh
April 30, 1962
[The North Carolina Conference for Social Service, an organization of
both laymen and professionals in the field of social welfare, heard Governor
Sanford urge North Carolinians to acquire a keen social awareness through
historical understanding and to accept the philosophy that government was
necessarily involved in the lives and happiness of its citizens. Two years
later, Sanford was awarded the North Carolina Conference for Social
Service Award for the many programs undertaken during his administration
on behalf of human welfare.]
As we spend millions of man-hours and tens of millions of
dollars in the race to the other side of space, it is incumbent on us
to remember fellow citizens on the other side of the tracks. This
golden anniversary of the North Carolina Conference for Social
Service makes it apparent that North Carolinians are remember-
ing these human beings on the "wrong" side of the tracks and
are working to remedy the social ills of our time.
North Carolina has traveled a long way in many areas of
human need since this organization was founded under the
leadership of people like Clarence Poe and J. Y. Joyner^^ in 1912.
When this organization was formed, chain gangs were con-
sidered an essential part of our penal system. Child labor was
defended as necessary in industry. Mental patients were locked
away in filth and misery. Compulsory vaccination for smallpox
and other communicable diseases was unknown. There was no
program to care for the dependent child, the lame, and the aged.
Workers hurt on the job received sympathy and very little else,
for there was no workmen's compensation laws in those days.
I believe those who now cry "socialism" when any legislation
is proposed to meet human needs might find it very informative
to review histories of the early part of this century.
For that matter, those who see government as a necessary evil,
at best, might well improve their perspective by reviewing the
newspapers and the histories of the thirties.
As North Carolina moved slowly forward in the twentieth
century to remove the abuses and to relieve the suffering of our
society, there was rarely a forward step taken that wasn't attacked.
Moves to protect the weak and to defend the poor and to heal
^ James Yadkin Joyner (1862-1954), lawyer, educator, alumnus of the Univer-
sity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; teacher, principal, professor; State Superin-
tendent of Public Instruction under Governor Charles B. Aycock; leader in shaping
educational policy and legislation. Ashe, Biographical History, VI, 335-341.
236
Papers of Terry Sanford
the ill and to give all of our citizens better opportunities have
almost invariably been challenged on the grounds that their
sponsors were "Reds" or spendthrifts, or at least "visionary, im-
practical, do-gooders." This opposition continues today. Happily,
the good sense and the good conscience of the large majority of
the citizens of North Carolina and of America have not been
scared away from social progress by the bogy men erected by
the shortsighted.
In free elections, the people of this state and of this nation
voted twice for the social reforms embodied in Woodrow \Vilson's
New Freedom, and they voted four times for Franklin Roose-
velt's New Deal. They voted for John Kennedy's New Frontier.
The people of North Carolina do not believe it is unduly
radical to use a round wheel when it is proved that a round wheel
will carry the needs of the people better than a square wheel.
The people of North Carolina do not believe that our free enter-
prise system is going communistic Tvhen you take the children
out of the mills, women out of sweatshops, and men off the
sixty-hour week. The people of North Carolina believe that a
prosperous state and nation must, in good conscience, give a
helping hand to the indigent old, to the physically and fiscally
disabled, and to the underprivileged child.
The state of North Carolina, working with county and munici-
pal governments, has adopted many programs for the benefit
of the less fortunate. Our religious training teaches us that we
are our brother's keeper. And we would be obligated to provide
these programs on that basis alone. But these programs go far
beyond helping the persons who are the direct recipients of the
benefits.
^Ve learned long ago that an epidemic is no respecter of bound-
ary lines between poor and well-to-do neighborhoods. We learned
that a criminal bred by slums has no particular scruples against
carrying out crime on the other side of town. We learned that a
communitv or a state or a nation is just so strong as its weakest
link.
That's Tvhy North Carolina moved to correct the weak links
in the social structure of our state. That's why North Carolina
abolished chain gangs and turned its attention to rehabilitation
of prisoners. That's ^vhy this state and this nation set up minimum
standards and maximum hours for industrial ^vorkers. That's why
North Carolina in 1959 became the first state in the Southeast to
enact a State Minimum AVage Act, and that's w^hy the 1961
General Assembly strengthened that act. That's why N'orth Caro-
lina enacted the mandatory smallpox vaccination bill some years
ago, and that's why North Carolina became the first state to enact
Public Addresses and Summaries
237
the polio vaccination program. That's why we replaced our
"snakepits" with decent mental hospitals where the mentally ill
are cared for and cured rather than imprisoned.
We have come a long way since 1912, but we still have a long
way to go. And that's why we are moving ahead with important
programs in the area of social legislation.
First and foremost is the quality education program which was
designed to give North Carolina's sons and daughters the same
opportunities as those offered to children in other states. The
1961 General Assembly had the vision to appropriate the funds
needed to improve the educational opportunities of our children.
And the legislators had the courage to raise the funds needed to
pay for those improvements. That program already is paying the
state dividends in many ways.
In 1961, North Carolina ranked first among all the fifty states
in the rate of advancement in public education.
Much remains to be done in the schools. In fact, it is a never-
ending job that we must continue to face so long as there are
children to educate. But the important thing is that North
Carolina is moving in the right direction.
In the field of education, we have a serious problem of drop-
outs—the students who leave school before they have completed
their high school work. We are working to solve this problem
through the Stay-In-School Committee. One of the major civic
clubs of North Carolina has taken this problem as a state-wide
project and is doing excellent work in this field. I am happy to
know that this conference is planning a follow-up meeting on
this problem of dropouts later this year.
An accompanying problem to that of dropouts is juvenile
delinquency. Now North Carolina does not suffer as critically
from juvenile delinquency as do the more highly populated
states. But we would be deluding ourselves if we thought it did
not exist in our state. Because juvenile delinquency is much more
easily prevented than cured, I have asked some 300 experts and
leading laymen to discuss this matter at a conference in Chapel
Hill on May 14.
Commissioner Blaine Madison and the State Board of Cor-
rection and Training have, over the years, developed a highly
effective program at the state training schools. The purpose of
these schools is to take young people who have gotten off on the
wrong track and to help them become self-respecting and self-
supporting citizens. The center for youthful offenders at Camp
Butner is an important project in this effort to set young people
who have strayed on the right paths. These correctional insti-
tutions have one of the best rates of rehabilitation in the nation.
238
Papers of Terry Sanford
An expanding prison population increases the importance of
the work being done by our Prison and our Probation depart-
ments. Our prison program is considered one of the soundest
and most enlightened, by just about everyone, except two
escaped prisoners and one lawyer in Rhode Island. [Reference
was to a case in which extradition was recommended following
a tour of North Carolina prisons by the defense attorney and
Rhode Island officials.]
Plans are now underway to provide psychiatric treatment
within the prison system so that the antisocial attitudes which
send people to prison in the first place may be corrected. Efforts
are being expanded rapidly for the cure and rehabilitation of
alcoholics in prison.
Our probation system is designed to give men and women the
supervised opportunity to prove that, given another chance, they
can conduct themselves as law-abiding citizens. This probation
program is not set up to forgive crime. It is operated to correct
crime. The results show that it is succeeding.
Another important facet of the state's efforts to replace incarcer-
ation with rehabilitation is the work release law under which
certain first offenders may continue to work during the daytime.
This program means simply that the offender, who shows good
promise of going straight, continues to support his family and
himself during his sentence.
A serious problem facing this state and most farm states is
that of migrant farm workers. The citizens of North Carolina
were shocked into an awareness of this problem several years ago
when a truck overloaded with migrants was involved in a wreck
near Fayetteville. The General Assembly has enacted legislation
to prevent recurrences of that particular aspect of the problem
and to establish requirements for sanitation at the camps. The
Committee on Agricultural Migrants and other state agencies
concerned are now at work to see that this legislation is enforced.
There are other programs being conducted by the state and
other problems facing our citizenry: the surplus food program,
special classes and special schools for the mentally retarded,
programs for alcoholics, the blind, the deaf, the handicapped. All
of these human needs, and others, demand our attention and
our best efforts.
I invite your advice and your assistance on the meeting of these
problems.
Only by facing up to these problems and solving them can
we truly say that North Carolina is a state where the weak
grow strong and the strong grow great.
Public Addresses and Summaries
239
ATLANTA ALUMNI CHAPTER OF THE
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA
Atlanta, Georgia
May 2, 1962
In this speech to fellow alumni, Governor Sanford reminisced
about the University of North Carolina. After describing a recent
visit to the Chapel Hill campus, the Governor compared the
institution with the University of Georgia; he concluded that the
distinctions were small as compared to the close co-operation
between the two schools. Sanford then turned his attention to
problems of out-of-state enrollments and faculty recruitment. At
the time of the address, there were 800 U.N.C. alumni living in
Atlanta and 194 Georgia students attending the Chapel Hill
university. The value of having out-of-state students attend North
Carolina schools, when many North Carolinians needed an edu-
cation, was unquestioned in his mind; the Governor commented
on the advantages of having new people and new ideas coming
into North Carolina schools. With the increase in student popu-
lation would come additional problems related to recruitment.
The Governor indicated that some faculty members for North
Carolina colleges would come from the University of North
Carolina; many would come from elsewhere. He stressed the
need for a faculty of high quality, saying that North Carolina
wanted to be compared with the nation rather than the region.
The University of North Carolina, as one of only forty-one
institutions belonging to the Association of American Universi-
ties, ranked as a top university. Sanford predicted that its
future would be one of continued achievement and that with
the support of the alumni its growth could mean positive gains
for the state and the nation.
MEDICAL SOCIETY OF NORTH CAROLINA
Raleigh
May 8, 1862
Governor Sanford discussed with the Medical Society a grave
illness: traffic accident deaths and injuries. In addition to the
human tragedy involved, he commented on the tremendous
property and economic loss. Prevention of such waste was
imperative, but the trouble in efforts to educate the public came
240
Papers of Terry Sanford
when many felt the campaign was directed at the other fellow
and others felt that accidents could not be prevented. The Gov-
ernor's Coordinating Committee on Traffic Safety was working
to determine the cause of accidents and to answer obvious ques-
tions before an official action program could be implemented.
The role of the physician was stressed, and Sanford urged the
doctors to assume positions of leadership to win citizen support
for the program. He called preventive medicine a thankless task
but added that it was often the best medicine. After winning
citizen support, the second major step was legislation to combat
the epidemic. The court improvement amendments would per-
mit the General Assembly to establish traffic courts under a
unified judicial system. Questions of drunken driving, teen-age
drivers, safety equipment, and others were being studied and
solutions sought. The Governor concluded with a plea to doctors
to help in the "crash program to stop the crashes."
NORTH CAROLINA STATE DEMOCRATIC
CONVENTION
Raleigh
May 17, 1962
North Carolina, called a "Dixie Dynamo" by a national maga-
zine, might have been called a "Democratic Dynamo" had the
magazine been partisan, according to Governor Sanford. In ad-
dressing the state Democratic convention, he reviewed twentieth-
century progress in North Carolina under Democratic leadership.
The party, realizing the value of education, continued to move
forward; and the Democratic majority in the 1961 General
Assembly, with the help of only one Republican vote, met the
challenge and chose the unpopular way in providing for quality
education. The party knew that the path to a brighter future
lay in education. Sanford observed that the people of North
Carolina recognized courage as being the primary requisite of a
legislator, and he prophesied that the legislators who voted for
quality education would be returned to the 1963 General
Assembly. "Courage, and vision, and a willingness to move for-
ward wdll keep the party strong," Sanford said, predicting that
the Democratic party would continue to fulfill its role of leader-
ship.
Public Addresses and Summaries
241
GRADUATION EXERCISES
APPALACHIAN STATE TEACHERS COLLEGE
Boone
May 26, 1962
Appalachian State Teachers College, primarily concerned with
the education of teachers, was reminded to look to its founder
and first president, B. B. Dougherty, for setting the tone for the
high professional training for teachers. The Governor discussed
education and the excellence required in teaching, saying that
this was an appropriate topic for a school which trained teachers.
"Civilization has made progress and is continuing to make prog-
ress in many ways, but progress makes problems, and problems are
always with any people." The Governor said that problems had
been solved through the pursuit of excellence, but that modern
standards had been lowered in too many ways, resulting in a
weakening of the individual soul and a weakening of the national
character and strength. He challenged everyone to pursue excel-
lence, saying that "Excellence in one pursuit spills over into
other activities." This was given as the reason teaching was
important, and the Governor urged those who were going to teach
to "define it and live by it and teach by it." He urged the gradu-
ates to set excellence as their example and to remember the
influence they would have on hundreds of lives. "There isn't any
more constructive way to spend your life," the Governor said in
conclusion.
JUNE DAIRY MONTH "KICK-OFF" BREAKFAST
Raleigh
June 1, 1962 1
The Governor took this opportunity to discuss the growth of
the dairy industry as part of the over-all program to develop and
co-ordinate food production, processing, and marketing across the
state. Enthusiasm for such a program was not new to dairymen,
who blazed the trail in many ways. The North Carolina food
industry, the Governor said, stood in 1962 where the dairy
industry had been two decades earlier. In 1945 a group of people
who recognized the dairy industry potential organized and raised
money for the establishment of a dairy teaching and research
program at North Carolina State College. As a result North
242
Papers of Terry Sanford
Carolina produced milk for its own requirements and exported
a quantity. The Governor gave statistics, citing the dairy industry
as an example of what could be achieved.
COMMENCEMENT EXERCISES
NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF
Morganton
June 6, 1962
Governor Sanford praised the graduates of the North Carolina
School for the Deaf on their demonstrated ability to overcome
handicaps. He then turned to the subject of their future, which
he described as "bright with promise." True education, he
reminded them, was lifelong in scope; this commencement, which
marked the end of one phase of education, was the beginning
of another. Graduation meant an opportunity to "move into the
full stream of responsibility as a citizen of North Carolina." It
also carried an obligation to serve those who would come later.
The Governor reminded his audience that schools were owned by
the people, and the people had the ultimate responsibility of
providing for education.
REPORT TO THE PEOPLE OVER
STATE-WIDE TELEVISION AND RADIO NETWORK
Raleigh
June 6, 1962
[The tragedy of highway traffic deaths continued to haunt the Governor.
Early in his administration he initiated programs whereby an emphasis
would be placed on traffic safety. In this direct report to the people of North
Carolina, by means of television and radio, the Governor previewed a five-
point highway program being planned by the state to curb senseless killing
and injury and property damage. Following the address, the Governor
received a number of letters on the subject of traffic safety. A man who had
lived in North Carolina twenty-four years wrote that he had never agreed
more than 50 per cent with any statement made by leading political figures,
but he could "honestly say that I agreed one hundred per cent with the mes-
sage which you brought to the public. ... I firmly believe that the five points
presented in your message will, and should, concur with the feelings of the
majority of North Carolinians." He told Sanford that the Governor had
"shown your intestinal fortitude in presenting five issues which you know
will be a 'hot potatoe' [sic] in political circles and in the next legislature.
I feel that you have done your part, but it is now time for the citizens of
Public Addresses and Summaries
243
North Carolina to match your intestinal fortitude and let their representa-
tives know their desires in this matter." In his closing sentences, the writer
said that reform could not begin at the state level, that there had to be
"desire for reform ... in the brain and heart of every individual. Law and
reform are not for the 'other fellow' alone; they are for me." A few days
later, Governor Sanford received a letter outlining a number of personal
experiences and ending with the question of blame. The writer an-
swered her own question by saying parents, who would not say "no" to
their children, and "you, and our law-makers, who are cognizant of these
facts, yet continue to talk and talk and talk, while our children (too many)
never attain their best capacities, become delinquents, or die so needlessly."
The Governor's concern continued, and in the spring of 1963, Sanford went
to the General Assembly to deliver in person another address on this sub-
ject. For this speech to the legislators, see pages 75-80.]
About three or four weeks ago a letter arrived at the Mansion.
Usually my mail goes to the office, which is in the Capitol, but
this letter turned up at the house, and my wife, Margaret Rose,
gave it to me.
The letter was from a woman down east who took me to task.
She told me that her son had been killed a few days before. He
had been driving up from Wilmington and another car had
appeared, coming extremely fast and slipping suddenly across
the center line. Her son evidently tried to avoid a collision, but he
couldn't make it. The woman asked me what kind of roads we
have in this state, when death is a constant traveler.
I have the letter here that this mother wrote, and Til read this
paragraph from it:
If there was a man shooting at people on US 421, you would try to have
him arrested. Why don't you have the speeders and reckless people arrested?
Somebody is being killed nearly every day. What's the matter with you in
Raleigh?
I sympathize with this woman. It's a tragic thing to lose a mem-
ber of one's family. I know that. And I agree with her that more
must be done if our highways are to be safe. Actually, they are
even more dangerous than she thinks. She says traffic accidents
take a life every day in North Carolina. They take one life every
seven hours. Not only that, but somebody is injured every fifteen
minutes. That totals about 100 people a day, killed or injured.
We have grown accustomed to viewing statistics coldly. After
all, they are merely numbers. But I remind you that we are
talking about families, and about individuals who bleed if cut.
I want this lady down east who lost her son to know, and I
want you to know, that I am in sympathy with those who suffer
on the roads and highways of this state.
There's a big problem here, and it won't be solved by good
intentions alone. It will not go down before a renewed siege of
244
Papers of Terry Sanford
determination, either. We must take action if we are to solve it,
and I intend to talk about action tonight. I would like to review
with you a program for our highways which I'm considering, and
I would welcome your views about it.
In fact, you might even want to get a pencil and piece of paper
to jot down notes as I talk, for there are several ideas in all. I
^vill tell you ^vhat has been suggested to me, and what I think
about it. W'e will go down the line point by point, idea by idea.
The first one is this: that we put out more literature and safety
announcements on the radio and television, to keep the people
aware of the problem.
My impression is that the existing publicity programs are
adequate. We don't need to spend money adding to them. By
now all of us know that safety is a serious problem, and surely
nobody in the state is in favor of accidents. I think too that the
people who really need educational programs on highway safety
don't listen to them. And the rest of us don't either. We seem
to feel the programs are for the other people. Therefore, it's
my impression that we don't need to press for more publicity
about highway safety.
There you have one idea which has been suggested to me,
which I feel will not yield additional results. What we need
is action.
Two types of drivers cause a high proportion of our accidents,
and we can use special legislation to deal more adequately with
them. One type is composed of young people betw^een the ages
of sixteen and twenty-one. There's no doubt about it, these
drivers are far more likely to have accidents than are other
age groups— two or three times as likely, as the record shows.
Some young drivers seem to be reckless by nature, to enjoy
moving at high speeds, to seek out danger. Not only are our
young people involved in a great many accidents, but they are
involved in some of the most violent, tragic ones. Right on the
threshold of a good life, they get broken up or cut down. Some
of you listening are in this age group. I'm not criticizing all of
you, but your group needs criticism. There was an accident
recently in which a car driven by a young man struck a tree.
The car's motor was ripped out and ^vent sailing into a field.
The car was demolished. The speed of the car was reckoned
at 100 miles an hour. The young man driving that car thought
he would never be involved in an accident. He doubtless liked
to speed. Maybe he would object to my suggesting tonight that
special legislation is needed to deal with his age group and its
driving problems. Maybe his youthful companions in the car
would object, too. But they won't, for he and they are dead.
Public Addresses and Summaries
245
except for one, and she is in the hospital badly crippled. It
might be that special regulations would have saved their lives.
Of course, a young man who will drive 100 miles an hour will
break any other rule. We have to take the drivers' licenses of
such people, that's the point of it. My feeling as of tonight is
this: that the drivers' licenses of our young people (and this is
particularly true of our young men), should be issued with
stricter requirements. Any serious infringement of the driving
privilege should bring about immediate cancellation of the
license. We cannot continue to have daredevil driving on the
public roads. I believe we need stricter rules for young drivers
than for the older ones.
A second type of driver causes far more than his share of
accidents, too. That's the drunken driver. Nobody believes a
drunken driver should be permitted to operate a car, not on the
roads as they are today. I've asked the highway people for a
count on how many of our accidents involve drivers who are
drinking, and the report is significant. Of the fatal accidents in
our state, drinking drivers are involved in at least one out of
every three of them.
It's time to press for better ways to get these people off the
roads. Our present ways are not the best. If a drinking driver is
brought in by a patrolman today, the question often arises as
to whether or not the driver is drunk. The driver often says
he isn't, while the patrolman says he is. This is a matter of
opinion. What's needed is a legal definition of what constitutes
drunkenness— a definition that can be measured exactly. Also, we
need equipment so that tests can be given drinking drivers to
find out if they are drunk. That is, when the scientific tests
show that a driver has a certain percentage of alcohol in his
system, then he is marked down as being a drunken driver,
drunk as defined by law, not drunk as a mere matter of opinion.
Therefore, we need a new law defining what constitutes
drunkenness on our roads, and we need equipment to make the
test. With that out of the problem, we can get the problem
under better control, and our roads will be that much safer.
The third suggestion which I recommend is that we hire
additional traffic engineers in order to get more of the dangerous
places out of our present roads. It was a surprise to me to find
out recently that the state has only three traffic engineers in
the Highway Department. When we think of all the miles of
roads, and the new roads being planned and built, we suspect
that more men would be useful. If the Highway Department had
more traffic engineers, it would be able to put our roads in
safer shape, to correct dangerous places.
246
Papers of Terry Sanford
I have traveled a great deal in North Carolina. This is a big
state. Anybody who travels it knows that. We need more traffic
engineers than we have. We need five times as many. They in
turn can help us fix up our existing roads and make new high-
ways safer.
The fourth suggestion is that we add patrolmen to the High-
way Patrol. I've looked into this matter and have asked the
patrol to tell me how many patrolmen they have on duty at any
one time for every thousand miles of road in the state. The
patrolmen we have must be spread around the clock, so I guessed
that they would say five or six, at any one time day or night,
for every thousand miles of road.
They don't say anything like that. They have only two. They
have one patrolman on duty for every 500 miles of road. A
patrolman can't even travel that far in an eight-hour shift. That's
the distance from Murphy to Morehead City. All the patrolman
can hope to do is patrol a section of this. Usually he has to stay
on the heavily traveled and most dangerous sections of the
primary roads. But accidents occur on all the roads.
You will perhaps agree that the Highway Patrol we have
is excellent. It's competent, it's dedicated, it's well-run. It re-
peatedly wins national awards. An enlarged patrol, however,
can do an even better job, can make the roads safer.
It will take some money to hire additional patrolmen, and to
keep these cars going, but the patrol makes the roads safer; each
one saves many times his cost in property damage alone, and
whenever there is an accident, the first helping hand is likely to
be the hand of a patrolman.
There is one more suggestion that I can recommend to you.
It pertains to the courts. Many of you will agree that some-
thing needs to be done to revise our court system. There is too
much red tape and delay and inconsistency. I'm a lawyer and I
respect the courts, but from my experience it's clear that the
system is cumbersome, has loopholes, and lacks uniformity. Cer-
tainly this is so in terms of our highway cases.
In November you will have a chance to vote on a new system
of courts. A constitutional amendment will be put on the ballot.
At that time you can tell the General Assembly to set up a uni-
form court system. I hope you will do so. Please set it firmly in
your memory to vote for court improvement at the election in
November.
So there you have five suggestions, which have been made to
me, which I am convinced we need. The first will help us get
the youthful driver problem under better control. We need to do
that.
Public Addresses and Summaries
247
The second will help us get the drunken driver off the roads.
Certainly he has no place there.
The third suggestion is that we hire more highway traffic
engineers, in order to improve existing roads, to get rid of
hazards, and to help with the planning of new highways.
Then the last two suggestions deal with law enforcement.
We should increase the size of the Highway Patrol, and we should
insist on a uniform system of courts.
These five measures will bring results. They are firm and
reasonable. They go straight to the core of five major problems.
They are needed in our state now.
However, they will not come about without support from you.
Most of them have opposition of one sort or another. For
example, whenever the state takes away a man's driver's license,
the man and his family strongly object. Occasionally the man
can't continue on his job, and this causes the entire family to
suffer. At the same time, we know some people shouldn't drive;
we need to get these unsafe drivers out from behind the wheel.
This is a life and death matter. And their lives, as well as ours,
are involved, even though they don't realize it.
Traffic judges need your support. They need for you to give
your approval when they convict according to the law. The
judge's job is a thankless job if there ever was one. Here's an
illustration of what I mean. If you build a hospital, people can
see it and appreciate it because they and their loved ones receive
the benefits of it. If you reduced accidents by 25 per cent, you
would save 300 lives in one year and avoid 10,000 injuries, but
the 300 people and their families would never thank the judges
because it is incomprehensible to them that they might have
been killed. Instead of thanking the judges, the solicitors, the
patrolmen, the mayors who save the lives, they are more likely
to complain and condemn these very people. But on the brighter
side, I believe these complainers are in the minority. I believe
the vast majority of the people are ready for a strong, firm
solution for these problems.
The five suggestions for action which I have made in this talk
are necessary, and I trust those of you listening will let your own
views be known.
I have here a few notes, other ideas which have been given
to me, which I am not ready to say should be a part of our pro-
gram. There might be value in some of them. One is the old
question of safety inspection of automobiles. This can become
a heated debate, as you might remember from past experience.
Fifteen years ago we had an inspection system for cars, and some
people raised the dickens. They complained that the system got
248
Papers of Terry Sanford
jammed up— and it did— and that the cars which needed most of
the repair work done were old cars, which they said caused few
of the accidents on the roads. The poor people said that they
would have to spend a large amount of money to fix up their
cars, while the rich man got by free. His brakes were good, his
windshield wipers worked well, his lights were most often in
adjustment, and so forth.
But surely we can agree that a car should have proper safety
equipment, no matter how old it is. I'm inclined to believe now
we might need a safety inspection program. If we do, I hope one
can be devised which can be easily administered and which will
be fair to everybody covering only the safety equipment, such
as brakes, tires, lights, steering, without a lot of petty rules and
restrictions in it. Your views on this matter will be helpful to me
in making up my own mind.
Here's a card with another idea on it. It suggests that we require
safety belts. Well, it is true it is almost impossible to get killed
if you are buckled in with a safety belt. It is now required that
brackets be installed in new cars, so you can put belts in if you
want to. I don't know about requiring them. What do you think?
Here's another card which reads as follows: "Would it be
possible to get the billboards off our highways? They cause
accidents." I don't know that they cause accidents. Of course, I
don't like billboards when they get to be lined up down a high-
way, or clustered, as they sometimes are. I noticed that Luther
Hodges complained recently to the people in the Maggie Valley,
near Waynesville, about the number of billboards there. It's
true that highway billboards add little to the roads, but I'm
not convinced that they cause accidents.
However, I admit that our attitudes toward our highways do
influence our use of them. Improvements such as roadside picnic
parks, things of that sort, help a great deal. It might be that the
state could work more than it does with citizen groups in order
to beautify stretches of our highways. I am thinking here that a
club in your town might be willing to undertake the planting
of flowering trees along a highway. They might use dogwood
trees, or redbud trees, which I call the Judas tree. Why not use
them more than we do? Up in the mountains, a laurel highway
is now planted, and that's a good thing, an asset to the state.
Rose bushes could be used everywhere more than they are. We
can plant them in patches, or we can plant a long stretch with
them. In other words, we can make our highways sources of pride,
and this will certainly have a bearing on their usefulness and
safety.
There are doubtless other ideas. You have some of your own.
Public Addresses and Summaries
249
I suspect. We will be pleased to consider them. We need good
thinking. But I am pretty well sold already on the need to seek
the five things I outlined earlier: special legislation tor young
drivers, special legislation for drinking drivers, more traffic engi-
neers, more highway patrolmen, and needed court improvements.
If you will join me on those five, we can make a dent in this
problem. We will begin to turn the tide, which now works so
painfully against us.
And please give some thought to inspection of safety equipment
and safety belts, and any other ideas you might have.
We asked the Institute of Government to analyze all of the
causes of accidents. We have already distributed the report to all
students sixteen to eighteen years old. The staff there has also
prepared this short, concise, concrete, and specific analysis.
Beginning in the morning we will distribute these to every
civic club member in the state, and to a half-million other drivers.
This is not the outline of a program. This is a study of the prob-
lem. We are not trying to "sell" a program. We are trying to find
solutions.
I want to call on the civic clubs for a special project. All of
them have safety chairmen. Sometime this summer, I hope you
will distribute this analysis, consider it, have a program concern-
ing safety actions, discuss the problem, make recommendations,
or pass resolutions, giving me your advice on what we should
do to stop this killing on the highways. This problem will not be
solved by drivers, as such, but by citizens.
Last year we managed to get the North Carolina Traffic Safety
Council started. It's an organization of citizens; it doesn't cost
the taxpayers anything. We also have the Governor's Coordinating
Committee on Traffic Safety, and it consists of top state officials.
They are preparing their recommendations for us, and I believe
they will recommend some of the actions we have discussed
tonight. When their report is ready, it will be released to all the
news media, and I hope you will give it your best thinking. You,
and they, and those of us in government need to work closer
together. We can't solve complex problems any other way. We
can help with the roads— and we're doing that in Raleigh and
Washington. We need new laws, and I can recommend them to
the General Assembly and you can recommend them to your
representatives. Beyond that we need to seek good ideas and to
create a more healthy attitude toward this predicament, which
involves us and our families. In olden times travel was dangerous
because of robbers; today it's dangerous because of ourselves and
our powerful machines.
I have chosen this special time to discuss this with you because
250
Papers of Terry Sanford
we're going into the summer season. That means more traffic
and perhaps more accidents. At this time I need to know what
legislation on this matter I should present to the General Assem-
bly. I have reviewed the entire matter with you; I will be happy
to receive your cards and letters. They will be read and entered
into the total consideration of this problem. Send them to the
Governor's Office here in Raleigh.
A while ago I read you one paragraph from the letter written
by a woman in the eastern part of the state. I will read you the
remainder of the letter.
What are you going to do about the problems we have in this state? What
do you do for us when a son is killed on the roads that you people in Raleigh
have made? I have lost a son, and I don't know what to do. Such accidents
go on and on. I read about them in the paper. What are you going to do
about them? I wonder if you care about us, sitting in your big office in
Raleigh.
It is very lonely in my house now. I think it is all over for me. I feel as
if my life has come to an end. My boy is gone, and he was the best part of
my life. What can you do now that he is gone?
We will do all we can.
OPENING SESSION OF SUMMER WORKSHOP AT
SOUTHERN REGIONAL EDUCATION BOARD MEETING
Williamsburg, Virginia
June 15, 1962
Governor Sanford, as chairman of the Southern Regional Edu-
cation Board, explained that the formal meeting of the board,
held at the time and place of the Southern Governors' Confer-
ence, was usually limited by time. For a full study and evaluation
of the board's activities, a summer meeting was devised in 1957.
The Governor turned to a consideration of the report of the
Commission on Goals for Higher Education in the South; the
report contained a master plan for improving higher education
and had received widespread recognition. Sanford said the report
revealed the poor position of the South, socially, economically,
and educationally. The reality of the situation was confronted
with four objectives: to provide full opportunity for all citizens
through a variety of institutions and through co-ordinated pro-
grams of adult education and extension work; to achieve the
highest degree of excellence in teaching, scholarship, and research;
to operate at maximum efficiency by making better use of physical
facilities and technological aids; to serve as an invigorating force
Public Addresses and Summaries
251
in the economic and social improvement of each state. The report
met with positive response, but Sanford called for a sustained
effort to see that the report's recommendations were enacted into
law by southern legislators. He felt that the Southern Regional
Education Board could exert powerful leadership to insure a
meaningful follow-up to the commission's report.
NORTH CAROLINA ASSOCIATION OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Morehead City
June 18, 1962
Governor Sanford recognized the responsibility of county
officials in moving North Carolina forward. He pointed out that
"The quality of state government reflects, to a large degree, the
quality of local government." North Carolina's position existed
because "(1) the potential for unprecedented progress has long
existed in North Carolina, (2) because our people have become
united in both their desire to develop fully this potential and
their confidence in their ability to do so, and (3) because the
state's leadership, at all levels of government, has recognized the
value of close co-operation in the formulation and execution of
intelligent, realistic, carefully co-ordinated plans of action." San-
ford called aggressive leadership the key to the future of the
state. He urged public officials to do more than was expected and
never be satisfied. He concluded by assuring county officials of
his confidence in their willingness to help in working co-oper-
atively for "a more prosperous state and a better life for the
people we serve."
NORTH CAROLINA METHODIST CONFERENCE
KiNSTON
June 19, 1962
Beginning with a story illustrative of a period of transition,
Governor Sanford continued with the observation that mankind
had always been faced with transition and change. He gave
examples of changes in farm life in the twentieth century and
changes in community life of rural people. These changes re-
quired readjustments; mechanization, for example, meant a
252
Papers of Terry Sanford
smaller rural population; the income of many farm families was
not on a par with other citizens. Despite problems, Sanford ex-
pressed the opinion that farms on a family-size scale should not
be foreclosed but should be reinvigorated. As an example of
positive steps taken to improve the farm situation, the Governor
discussed the Agricultural Opportunities Program, with its goal
of farm income of $1.6 billion by 1966— "1.6 in '66." Food process-
ing as an expanded industry would provide farmers with new
markets and new employment and would make for opportunities
near farms. Paved rural roads, a quality education program, and
conservation of water resources were only a few of the assets
which would prove to be a boost to farms. The Governor then
discussed agriculture as a weapon against communism, with sur-
plus food being important to the defense of the free world. War-
time conditions would require more than the surpluses on hand,
though the Governor expressed the hope that it would never be
necessary to use the surpluses for war. He said that farmers in
communist areas had resisted nationalization of their land, homes,
lives, and that free America had to take the offensive in using
the farm surpluses to feed a hungry world. This step had to be
taken, not only to win friends, but because it was morally right.
Sanford called the surpluses a blessing, not a burden, and asked
that this blessing be shared with underfed people around the
world.
SOUTHERN ASSOCIATION OF BAPTIST COLLEGES AND
SCHOOLS AND EDUCATION COMMITTEE OF THE
SOUTHERN BAPTIST CONVENTION
Winston-Salem
June 27, 1962
Governor Sanford chose the sometimes controversial topic of
church-state relationships on which to speak to this Baptist
group. He called religion the foundation of culture in America;
he explained that, though separation of church and state had
been a basic principle of the country, that did not mean that
government should be godless. The Governor questioned the
Supreme Court decision banning prayer in the public schools.
He said no school should require prayer but citizens should
"continue to use, encourage, and promote prayer in the schools,
out of schools, in government, and out of government." He spoke
of the partnership between church and state, citing the establish-
Public Addresses and Summaries
253
ment of educational institutions as an example. Educational
institutions had to be provided by both government and churches
and the cost to the individual had to be kept within reach.
He commended the Baptists for their stand in favor of the separ-
ation of church and state, saying that decisions regarding edu-
cational needs and facilities would have to be made without
violating this principle or the basic belief in the right of private
groups to establish and maintain schools. At the same time, plans
could and would have to be made together. He urged citizens
to ''demonstrate . . . qualities of citizenship as well as . . . qualities
of loyalty to . . . religious beliefs. . . ." He added that they needed
to "merge these two and wear . . . [the] two hats of citizenship
and religion with dignity and with commitment to basic human
welfare."
NATIONAL GOVERNORS CONFERENCE
Hershey^ Pennsylvania
July 2, 1962
Governor Sanford took advantage of another opportunity to
sell North Carolina when he addressed the National Governors
Conference. He discussed industrial development as one of many
efforts to raise income, but he explained that the North Carolina
program did not include tax concessions. The state had not
stolen industry, though it welcomed industries which chose to
come to North Carolina. Programs to train individuals in twenty
industrial education centers, appropriations at the state level,
hard ^vork at the local level, and constructive programs in the
Department of Conservation and Development were all factors
which had resulted in success. Sanford explained that the state
paid particular attention to existing industries. Trade fairs and
"Made in North Carolina Week" were cited as examples of two
ways of showing appreciation to industries established in the
state. In turn, industries became good-will ambassadors for North
Carolina. The whole purpose of the program of industrial devel-
opment was "to help people, men and women, have a better
chance to make a better living."
254
Papers of Terry San ford
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNTY OFFICIALS
New York, New York
July 11, 1962
[The responsibilities of local governments, as opposed to those of state
and national governments, were often argued by laymen, legislators, and
administrators. In his address at the National Association of County Officials
in New York, Governor Sanford discussed this subject and emphasized the
advantages of local leadership in specified areas.]
There is a lot of talk about home rule. Our theme this morn-
ing is what we can do about it.
Not many years ago the roads were designed, built, and main-
tained by decisions made by county governing bodies. The
welfare responsibilities were met by the operation of a county
home, or the "poor house" as it was called in Scotland County
when I was a boy. The schools, although they might have received
a little "encouragement" money from the state government,
were built and the teachers paid by local governments which
thereby established educational standards. Law enforcement was
a county or town undertaking. How far to go, or not to go, was
a matter of home rule.
But that was yesterday. When Adam and Eve were being
banished from the Garden of Eden, Adam turned to Eve and
said, "My dear, we are living in a period of transition." And so
it is.
Changes not in government but in conditions brought a
transition in home rule. The mule and "drag pan" and the man
with the pick passed on. The need for more roads, the necessity
for multicounty planning, and the coming of heavy construction
equipment combined to shift many road decisions from court-
houses to state capital, or at least to state divisional offices.
The depression, demonstrating that the counties where people
most needed welfare financial assistance were least able to provide
it, moved other decisions to the statehouse and the nation's
capitol.
So change brought change and will continue to bring more
change.
There were valid reasons for some shifts toward more cen-
tralization away from local decisions. Faster transportation and
communication made crossing county lines by state authority and
state lines by federal authority imperative.
In too many places, however, it was a matter of abdication.
Local leaders got tired of leading. They failed to respond to
Public Addresses and Summaries
255
demand for needed governmental services, and citizens turned
away to higher governments for solutions to their problems.
This has been true not only of the shift from local to state,
but from state to national, and the basic reason is that it is far
easier to let someone else solve our problems.
I get disheartened almost every time a conference of state or
local officials is conducted about any specific problem because,
more likely than not, their labors bring forth the decision in
profound words that what we need is more federal aid. This is a
"national problem," they declare.
For example, I don't think we need to look to the federal
government for a juvenile delinquency program. If there is one
thing that can be cared for better the closer to home we can
keep it, it is juvenile correction. Maybe our interest can be
promoted by national groups, but the solution is not national
action.
I see no reason to call for federal help because urban trans-
portation is a knotty problem. Sure it is, but all of the leadership
for solving knotty problems is not in Washington. Sure it is
easier to get money from the federal government, but that is
exactly what we are talking about, or rather talking against,
when we seek more local authority.
I know how hard it is to get tax money locally, but it will cost
all of us less if we get it locally to spend locally rather than letting
the federal government get it locally to spend locally.
This is like pouring buttermilk from one glass to another. By
the time it gets to the third glass there is about 20 per cent less
to drink.
I am sure that the President, and most cabinet members, and
substantial leadership in the Congress would like to stop the
trend to centralization, but they can't do it unless the public
will tolerate it; and the public will not accept it until we as state
and local officials demonstrate our competence and our willing-
ness to handle the legitimate needs of the people.
So this puts the burden of home rule on us. Nobody else is
going to take up this cause because nobody else is in the position
of responsibility for home rule.
Home rule and local decisions are particularly important today.
In these days of rising state and local taxes, and very high federal
taxes, all governmental activity is subject to the closest scrutiny
and people everywhere heed the call for economy.
There is a strong cry against centralization, because of the
inflexibility, the duplication, the remoteness, the waste, the delays
which result when government is too far away from the people it
is designed to serve.
256
Papers of Terry San ford
If we do not put our governmental house in order in a way
that brings greater economy and greater service, we will play into
the hands of the right-wing extremists who believe that govern-
ment is not designed to serve and who, in the false name of
economy, would eliminate or curtail the services of education,
roads, health, welfare, and the other essential and common pur-
poses of democratic government.
This is why home rule is so important today. If we fail to
check centralization, government may very well sustain a loss
in public confidence.
Your program impresses me. This is your third day of examin-
ing home rule in its many aspe':ts. You began with Bill Mac-
Dougall's^^^ description of home rule in the democratic process.
You have considered various approaches and have heard specific
examples.
There is much to know about home rule, and a complexity of
variations, but one thing is certain: We are in favor of it!
What action will strengthen it is a different story.
We are talking about a fundamental ideal of democratic gov-
ernment when we promote home rule and local decision, for this
means keeping government as close as possible to the people.
That is an easy and proper position to take.
The difficulty lies in applying this ideal to individual functions,
structures, and situations of government. What political action
should we take to extend home rule?
What should be a local decision, and how is it to be made and
paid for, and who decides what is local and what is not, are
matters of application.
County governing boards, whether called commissioners or
supervisors, or juries, or courts, or one of twenty-three other
titles, and with membership ranging from one to more than fifty,
charged with duties ranging from all schools to no schools, all
roads to no roads, all prisoners to no prisoners, make impossible
one single and simple suggestion of political action necessary to
protect the right of home rule.
For example, do you want anything to do with rural roads?
Do you want to plan, build, or maintain them? Do you want to
pay for them or share in the price? Do you want to play a part
in planning or paving or setting priorities? In some states 90
per cent of the rural roads belong to the counties, along with the
100 William R. MacDougall, general counsel, County Supervisors Association of
California; keynote speaker at 1962 national conference of county officials. 1962
County Yearbook (Chapel Hill: North Carolina Association of County Commis-
sioners, 1962), 123.
Public Addresses and Summaries
257
problems and the payments. In other states, North Carolina
included, 100 per cent belongs to the state.
Is this good or bad, and can greater efficiency, and therefore,
more roads be a justifiable price to pay for this diminished bit of
home rule?
Do you want to control totally the purse strings of education,
as you do in some counties, or do you want to share this as is done
in some counties, or do you want to give this over to other
agencies as is done in some counties?
There is one certain pattern to the government of American
counties and that is a total lack of uniformity.
This has given us flexibility and provided examples of progress
and is a tradition well worth maintaining. We do not seek uni-
formity and conformity to the master plan, not even in our
definition and goal of home rule.
There is a reason for centralization and a reason for maintain-
ing local decision. We need to test each issue and each function
individually.
Some things can be done more efficiently and effectively from
the courthouse, some from the statehouse, and some from Wash-
ington.
It seems to me that there are three parts to the action we should
take.
First, we should define for ourselves, within the context of
our counties and our states, what is desirable and what is possible.
Obviously a Delaware county would not set out the details in the
same matter defined by an Oklahoma county. Surely each state
association could propound its home rule goals in definite
fashion. In this way we can know what we seek and the people
can know why we seek it.
Second, we need, as always in democratic government, to con-
sider the appropriate political action. It would be very easy to say
that in order to obtain more home rule, or more authority to
decide questions locally, all you have to do is put the pressure
on the state legislature to increase your statutory authority, or
to insist that state agencies impose fewer state restrictions and
authorize more local decisions. But this would be as misleading
as it is inaccurate, for this is not all that there is to it.
Legislatures act in response to citizen demand, or at least with
the tacit approval of the voters. So a case must be made to the
legislature to get it to act, and this must have general public
support. Also, state agencies have their own responsibilities and
their own ideas as to the best way of discharging these responsi-
bilities. Like the counties, they depend on a grant of authority
from the legislature. But unlike the counties, they look at things
258
Papers of Terry Sanford
on a state-wide basis which often conflicts ^vith the way particular
areas look at the same things. Some areas may want more, and
some less, activity. And the state agency's responsibility is to arrive
at a workable happy medium— which, like compromises, generally
tend to satisfy nobody.
I emphasize this particular aspect of state-county relations—
for after all home rule and local decisions in the major concerns
of county activity exist in the context of state-county relations.
This is true of public schools, public welfare, and public health.
These three activities involve 90 per cent of the expenditures of
our North Carolina counties, and more than 75 per cent of our
state budget, excluding roads and highways. In most states,
it is also true in roads and highways.
My point is that necessarily there is a state-wide interest and
a local interest in most of our responsibilities. The state-wide
interest is often phrased in terms of a minimum, or basic pro-
gram. The state, acting in response to citizens' demands, provides
that each child shall be given a certain minimum education; that
each needy person shall receive a grant based on a minimum
standard of decency and health; that certain conditions detri-
mental to public health shall be eliminated. Home rule, then,
cannot mean a reduction of the state-wide minimum level, no
matter what the wishes of a particular area. A majority of people
of the entire state have decided the matter, and they will not
have their will frustrated by local inaction.
The proper responsibility for local decision is how to provide
each child with the minimum education that child needs, plus
additional education to make the child as productive an adult
as possible; how to distinguish the needy from the lazy, and how
to rehabilitate the physically and mentally disabled; how to
identify and deal with public health problems that truly are
harmful.
This is the position for home rule and local decision in the
state-county relationship context. The states will not and can-
not allow local decision to override state-wide policy. And as
you approach state agencies to obtain more local authority, you
must understand and appreciate their position just as they must
understand and appreciate yours. While local decision cannot
override state-wide policy, state agencies should not attempt to
use the cloak of state-wide policy to interfere in local decisions.
This makes continuous negotiation and compromise necessary.
This negotiation and compromise must be conducted in the spirit
of good will, in an attempt to harmonize state-wide interest with
local administration to achieve efficiency and economy.
I can speak for myself on this point, and I have made myself
Public Addresses and Summaries
259
clear to the county officials of my own state. I have worked and
will continue to work with our North Carolina counties to pro-
vide maximum local authority and autonomy. I believe local
government, carried out close to the people served, should be and
can be responsive government. I believe it should be and can be
efficient and economical government. I believe it can be pro-
ductive. For these reasons I believe as much as possible should
be decided locally. But the Governor of the entire state cannot
and will not allow the decision of a particular locality to frustrate
or override a state-wide interest.
You cor.nty officials can and must help to achieve home rule
and local decision. If political action is the key to home rule, the
political atmosphere is the key to political action. If county
officials and state officials are to work together to increase home
rule and local decision, they must have the approval of citizens
and voters. And if state and local officials disagree, the victor on
a particular issue will be the side having the greater popular
support.
My point is this: To create the political atmosphere necessary
to increase home rule and local decisions, you must act responsi-
bly in areas where you now have authority. It is often said that
responsibility and authority go together. If you are to have
more authority, you must be responsible.
Look at it this way. If counties do not respond to citizens'
desires for services, these citizens will not be willing to see more
authority granted to counties. If counties do not provide existing
services economically and efficiently, citizens will not be willing
to provide more opportunity for waste. If counties do not merit
confidence in the existing operations, they will not have oppor-
tunity for additional operations. This is no easy task. Like a stone
wall, built by adding stone on stone, public confidence is earned
and won by a steady succession of satisfactory actions. Some coun-
ties have further to go than others, just as some states have further
to go than others.
The third suggestion sums up the first two in a word. The word
is leadership. You occupy the positions of leaders. You were
elected to lead, not just to preside. Home rule and local decisions
flourish when local leaders are willing to fight for better edu-
cational opportunities for local children. Overcentralization in
government is retarded when local leaders get out on a limb to
stand for planning, and development, and slum avoidance, and
proper endeavors which promote a stronger economy and a more
wholesome community.
Home rule follows leadership. If your mission is vigorously the
260
Papers of Terry Sanford
mission of the people, then you are promoting, developing, and
achieving home rule.
DEDICATION OF THE CHARLOTTE
INDUSTRIAL EDUCATION CENTER
Charlotte
July 18, 1962
[Industrial education centers, established during the administration of
Governor Hodges, were made components of the comprehensive system of
community colleges and were greatly expanded during the Sanford admin-
istration. With part-time instruction in various trade and specialty courses
for high school juniors and seniors and adult education courses, the centers
featured an "open door" policy of admission and stressed individualized
learning. These dedicatory exercises at Charlotte gave the Governor another
opportunity to discuss education and its relation to the total economy. San-
ford suggested the inclusion of a liberal arts program to complement the
practical instruction given at the centers.]
I am happy to have a part in the exercises dedicating the Char-
lotte Industrial Education Center. This is part of our state-wide
declaration of war on poverty.
Such a complete and effective job has been done in remodeling
this building that it is hard to recognize it as the old Central
High School which was erected in the early twenties and in which
Dr. Garinger^^i served as the first principal.
While this building has been extensively remodeled and while
the industrial education center, now housed here, is a different
type of institution, in no small degree it inherits the mantle of
Central High School. Many successful men and women in Char-
lotte and Mecklenburg County, but also in many other areas of
our state and nation, have moved out from this building to
successful careers and to lives of valuable service to their state
and their nation. All of these have carried with them the very
fine reputation that Central High School built for providing
excellent educational opportunity. This reputation for excellence
was due in no small measure to the leadership of Dr. Garinger,
as well as to the leadership of many other people here in Char-
lotte.
I am certain that this industrial education center will uphold
Elmer Henry Garinger (1891- ), educator from Charlotte; Superintendent
of Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools, consultant in education, Visiting Professor of
Education at Appalachian State Teachers College, University of North Carolina at
Chapel Hill, University of Missouri, and Peabody College; civic and government
worker; representative in the General Assembly, 1963. North Carolina Manual,
1963, 573-574.
Public Addresses and Summaries
261
this record of excellence in providing education. There is no
more important task that we face than the task of extending
educational opportunity beyond the high school. In doing this,
your industrial education center here in Charlotte fills a place
in a pattern of such institutions throughout our state.
In all areas of life, the welfare of our state will move forward
on the feet of educated people. This is as true in economic wel-
fare as it is true in the area of citizenship in general.
The economic pattern of life in North Carolina has changed
radically since the day that this building was first erected. In fact,
even during the twenty years from 1940 to 1960, there have been
great changes in the way that people make a living in North Caro-
lina. For example, in 1940 agricultural employment accounted
for 33.8 per cent of our labor force. By 1950 this had fallen to 24.6
per cent, and in 1960 it has declined sharply to 12.8 per cent. The
twenty-year period from 1940 to 1960 showed a 49.6 per cent
decline in the proportion of the labor force engaged in agri-
culture.
At the same time, the percentage of the population engaged
in manufacturing has increased sharply. In fact, manufacturing
employment in North Carolina has advanced consistently since
the mid-fifties in contrast with a near stable level in manufactur-
ing employment for the nation as a whole. We now find in 1960,
1,200,500 people in nonagricultural employment; and manu-
facturing industries account for 42.4 per cent of this nonfarm
employment. This ratio is considerably above the national ratio
which is 30.6 per cent. Expansion of industries that we have had
in our state for a number of years has accounted for a great deal
of this increase. At the same time, we are making significant
progress in attracting new industries.
Last year over a quarter of a billion dollars was invested in
North Carolina in new industrial plants in our state. Last year
some 35,000 new jobs, with an annual payroll of more than
$117 million, were established for the people of North Carolina.
The Department of Conservation and Development reports to
me that for the first six months of this year, we ran ahead of the
same period in the record-setting year of 1961.
While we are proud of our record in industrial expansion, we
plan to continue working hard to create a balance in the types
of manufacturing in North Carolina. Our manufacturing is
largely devoted to nondurable goods. These producers provide
approximately 72 per cent of the state's manufacturing employ-
ment. At the same time, employment in durable goods manu-
facturing in this state accounts for only 28 per cent of the total.
262
Papers of Terry Sanford
We can compare four industries in durable goods and four in
nondurable goods in order to see just what this picture is. In the
United States, furniture, lumber and wood products, metal
products, and electrical goods account for 36.1 per cent of the
manufacturing industries. In North Carolina, these same four
account for 24.4 per cent of the total manufacturing output. Four
industries in nondurable goods— textiles, tobacco, apparel, and
food— account for 23.7 per cent in the United States and 63.1 per
cent in North Carolina.
Not only are we somewhat out of balance as we compare
durable goods manufacturing ^vith nondurable goods manufactur-
ing, but in specific areas we are out of balance. For example, in
the durable goods. North Carolina is far ahead of the nation in
furniture manufacturing and in lumber and wood products
manufacturing, but we are far behind the nation in metal
products and some behind the nation in electrical goods manu-
facturing. We are working to attract more of the metal products
manufacturing and electrical goods manufacturing businesses to
North Carolina, while we work to hold our lead in the other
areas.
If ^ve look at the nondurable goods industries, we find that
North Carolina is heavily engaged in textile manufacturing which
accounts for 43.8 per cent of our manufacturing operations;
whereas, this per cent is 5.3 per cent for the nation. We are also
far ahead in tobacco, but ^ve are behind in apparel and in food.
Certainly, we should not be behind in processing of food through
manufacturing enterprises. Our percentage in North Carolina in
food manufacturing is 6.5 per cent compared with 10.6 per cent
for the nation as a whole.
This concentration of manufacturing in a few relatively major
industry groupings indicates that we do not have the kind of
balance in our manufacturing structure that we should have. We
have made excellent progress, but we need to make much more.
We are going to give every assistance possible to the growth of the
great established industries of our state, including textiles,
tobacco, and furniture. But at the same time, we are also going
to be seeking more diversified industry.
I have already mentioned the sharp drop in agricultural em-
ployment. There are, how^ever, many activities that are closely
related to agriculture, such as food processing, that we need to
develop.
Public Addresses and Summaries 263
Dr. Rupert Vance^^- of the University of North Carolina says
that a fully industrialized society will have a large proportion of
the labor force engaged in service, distribution, and clerical
activities. There are many types of jobs in all of these areas
that we have not developed fully in North Carolina.
In the final analysis, industrial welfare means human welfare.
While we must be concerned that the manpower needs of
industry, agriculture, and business are met, we must also be con-
cerned that the needs of the people of the state shall be met; and
among these needs is the need for education, including vocational
education.
This industrial education center and others like it are being
established to provide the manpower needs of the state. But first
of all, they are to provide for human needs. The Employment
Security Commission of North Carolina has just completed a very
able study of the manpower needs of our state. These findings are
to be used in many different ways. Among these ways, they will
be used to determine the types of training programs needed in the
industrial education centers in North Carolina. In addition to
the information we secure from this study of manpower needs,
we have also secured information about the flood of high school
graduates who will be moving into the labor force or institutions
for education beyond the high school. Information of this nature
being developed by the Carlyle Commission on Education Beyond
the High School ties closely in with the information from the
Employment Security Commission study in order to give us the
kind of data that we must have if we are going to meet the needs
of our people in terms of economics and in terms of education.
I have been pointing out to you that we in North Carolina
can be proud of the improvement we have been making in the
economic posture of our state and in the job opportunities made
available for our people. We cannot be as proud of our record in
providing educational opportunities. For example. North Caro-
lina has the poorest record of any state save only Mississippi in
the percentage of our young people who attend college. We can
hardly hide behind a feeling of pride in economic advancement,
while, at the same time, we follow policies that keep half of our
college-capable youngsters out of college. We may also extend
this by saying that there are many more of our people who should
Rupert B. Vance, Arkansas native; Professor of Sociology at the University of
North Carolina at Chapel Hill since 1929; research professor at the Institute for
Research in Social Science in Chapel Hill. The University of North Carolina at
Chapel Hill Record: The General Catalogue Issue, 1962-1963 (Chapel Hill: Uni-
versity of North Carolina Press, 1962), hereinafter cited as University Record,
1962-1963. .
264
Papers of Terry Sanford
not go to college to train for the professions but are fully capable
of being educated as technicians and skilled craftsmen in all
phases of work.
The state must educate; the state must be educated. The
alternative is slavery— economic, cultural, social, and political
slavery. The choice is between ignorance and enlightenment on a
vast scale. We must double our enrollments in institutions giving
education beyond the high school or we will certainly double
our problems and our poverty.
The people of this state are hungry for the type of education
that will be provided and is now being provided in this institution.
How else can we explain that in the space of three years we are
reaching 35,000 young people in the industrial education centers,
many of whom would not have gone to any type of training
institution beyond the high school if these centers had not been
available. They have enrolled because they need education for
economic survival in an economy that is changing more rapidly
than our ideas about education are changing. Now the questions
must be: Is terminal education, alone, adequate for them? Is
vocational education all that they need? Do they not also need
an opportunity for certain liberal studies in the program of
education in this institution and in other institutions that may be
developed in North Carolina?
At the same time that we see clearly the need for improvement
in our economic posture in North Carolina, we also must have
an equal concern, if not a greater concern that the human values
shall be recognized and provided for. We must be concerned that
every child have an excellent, appropriate educational opportunity
available for him, and we must also see that in a changing world
this educational opportunity can no longer be ended with the
public school program.
Walter Hines Page pointed out very clearly the need for
recognizing the importance of education for all. This is the way
he expressed it:
Society forever needs reinforcement from the rear. It is a shining day in
any educated man's growth when he comes to see and to know and to feel
and freely to admit that it is just as important to the world that the raga-
muffin child of his worthless neighbor should be trained as it is that his
own child should be. Until a man sees this he cannot become a worthy
democrat nor get a patriotic conception of education; for no man has
known the deep meaning of democracy or felt either its obligation or its
lift till he has seen this truth clearly.^'^
I am sure that you believe as strongly in the potential future
of North Carolina as I believe. I am sure that you are as dedicated
Page, Rebuilding of Old Commonwealths, 89-90.
Public Addresses and Summaries
265
as I am to raising the economic level and the general cultuial
level of our people. The existence of this institution demonstrates
concretely that you understand that the way to achieving our
goals is through improved educational opportunity. I am certain
that you are concerned that all people shall have appropriate,
excellent educational opportunity and that we cannot, if we love
our state and if we have any hope at all for the future, neglect
providing educational opportunity beyond the high school for
all who need this opportunity.
AVERY COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Crossnore
August 1, 1962
Governor Sanford, speaking in Avery County, reminded his
audience that other counties were engaged in programs to create
employment and raise incomes, but he cited Avery as a county
which had taken action. The county's average income per person
was less than a quarter of the national average and the com-
munities faced loss of population. It was assumed that the county
had to have industry, but the people came to realize that industry
was only one solution. The decision was made to develop tourist
facilities, engage in agricultural enterprises such as the raising
of fruits and Christmas trees, and establish small industries. Lack
of capital was a problem until funds became available through
the Federal Area Redevelopment Act. The County Planning
Board, building on the groundwork laid by the Chamber of
Commerce, was formed. The board did not displace any existing
group, but in its advisory and co-ordinating capacity it represented
all major economic interests. Reminding the group that neighbor-
ing counties had also made outstanding progress, the Governor
advised the Avery County people not to become complacent but
to concentrate on continued improvement. He solicited the help
of every citizen in selling the area.
ANNUAL MEETING, NORTH CAROLINA
POLICE EXECUTIVES ASSOCIATION
Raleigh
August 3, 1962
Governor Sanford told this group of police executives that
law, the backbone of society, was worthless unless it was respected
266
Papers of Terry Sanford
and enforced. He said that the policeman personified law for the
majority of the people. The Governor then launched into a dis-
cussion of the proposed court reform amendment, saying that an
efficient court system was imperative to modern law enforcement,
that times changed and old machinery needed replacement, and
that North Carolina was being asked to support a revision of an
outdated system. The purpose of the amendment was to establish
a uniform system of lower courts. Though there were many
excellent courts, the state had 1,400 of them operating independ-
ently. The amendment provided for the division of the state into
local court districts. The plan would be worked out by the General
Assembly in conjunction with an administrative office which
would be established to free judges of details. Sanford remarked
that justice was everybody's business and that court improvement
should be important to every citizen. He closed with a word of
confidence that law enforcement in North Carolina would face
up to the challenge of progress.
CEREMONIES COMMEMORATING THE
ESTABLISHMENT OF THE FIRST SOIL
CONSERVATION DISTRICT IN AMERICA
Wadesboro
August 7, 1962
Governor Sanford, speaking on the spot on which the first soil
conservation program was initiated twenty-five years earlier,
briefly reviewed accomplishments of the program. The original
district of 120,000 acres in Anson and Union counties grew to
3,000 districts covering more than 92 per cent of the nation's
farm and range land. The Governor stressed the need to continue
the program to assure proper use of natural resources. He said
the responsibility was one which would produce rewards if prop-
erly assumed; future generations would enjoy prosperity if the
present generation assumed its rightful responsibility.
STATE-WIDE TELEVISION ADDRESS ON THE
FOOD PROCESSING INDUSTRY
Durham
August 7, 1962
[One of the top-priority programs of the Sanford administration was the
expansion of the food processing industry. A thirty-minute documentary (pro-
J
Public Addresses and Summaries 267
duced by WTVD, Durham, in its "Dixie Dynamo" series), showing food
crops and processing plants filmed from the coast to the mountains, was
shown while the Governor discussed efforts being made to capitalize on the
multibillion dollar market. For another address in which Sanford presented
the need for expansion in the area of food processing, see the summary of
the April 17, 1962, speech on page 233.]
During the coming months I hope to discuss with you the vital
issues that are important to every citizen of the state. Among
these issues are such things as court improvement, the state's
prison system, North Carolina's water resources, the welfare pro-
gram, and other subjects of equal importance.
On this program I want to talk with you about food processing
in North Carolina— its accomplishments and its opportunities.
Since the Colonial days we have been known as an agricultural
state, primarily for our cotton and tobacco. For more than two
centuries our entire economy was geared to the production of
these commodities. It has only been during this century that food
crops have supplemented farm income to any degree, and only
in the past few years has food processing started to move into its
own in the state.
Feeding 180 million persons three meals a day not only is a
great responsibility but is also a great challenge. The farms of
North Carolina and the nation are providing the foodstuffs to
make this the best fed nation in history.
At this season of the year when fresh produce reaches the
market in quantity we are all impressed with nature's abundance
in North Carolina: the fields of corn, apples ripening in the
mountains, tomatoes on the vine, green fields all over the state,
and those taste-tempting strawberries and Sandhills peaches.
If we limited ourselves entirely to the fresh produce market,
we'd find ourselves in the position of providing fewer and fewer
job opportunities for our people while at the same time paying
a premium for food processed out of state. We have made a start
and now we have the opportunity of greatly expanding what we
are dong toward providing those 540 million American meals a
day.
It hasn't been too long ago that a good sized grocery store
carried no more than a thousand different food items on its
shelves. When you go into a modern supermarket today you find
up to 7,000 articles, and the number is increasing constantly.
Some of these are presently being processed in North Carolina,
some for purely local distribution, others for regional or even
national markets.
Just a few years ago the state had to import many products
that weren't grown in sufficient quantity to make processing
268
Papers of Terry Sanford
worthwhile. Now that picture is rapidly changing and many of
the items we were getting from as far away as the Pacific North-
west or even Japan are being profitably produced and processed
in this state.
Some of North Carolina's food plants have been around for
many years. Others are almost brand new. Pickles have long been
a favorite; consequently it was no great surprise when a new
plant began operation in Henderson three years ago. An ag-
gressive local industrial group convinced some hardheaded in-
vestors that what had been done successfully in Mount Olive and
Faison could be done in Vance County. The only surprising thing
has been the rapid growth and expansion of this organization.
This company employs from 200 to 600 persons, depending on
the season, and puts more than |2 million into the economy of
the surrounding counties. Along with its counterparts it has
helped raise North Carolina into the second largest cucumber
producing state in the nation. Management of the firm gives much
credit to North Carolina State College for one of its developments
that has been a boom to the industry. Researchers at the college
were able to isolate a bacteria that caused cucumbers to soften
during fermentation. This research saved the industry thousands
of dollars.
Ten years ago sweet red and green peppers were a negligible
crop in North Carolina when a company began operations in
Dunn. Now several hundred acres of the vegetable are being
harvested every year. The first two seasons were bad crop years,
but persistence and faith in the future paid off. Next time you
eat a stuffed green pepper or have a pizza with pepper strips,
more than likely it will have been grown and processed in North
Carolina.
Men of vision have been responsible for the growth of North
Carolina's three great industries: tobacco, textiles, and furniture.
Men like Reynolds and Duke had the inspiration and determi-
nation to take North Carolina's tobacco and process it into the
finished product. They know that what we can grow in North
Carolina, we can process in North Carolina. The Loves and the
Cannons used this principle in the development of textiles. The
same is true of the furniture industry.
The Department of Food Science and Processing has been
established at State College under the leadership of Dr. William
Roberts. This department is equipped to provide technical
iw William Milner Roberts, head of depai tment and Professor of Food Science
at North Carolina State University at Raleigh. North Carolina State College Gen-
eral Catalog, 1962-1964 (Raleigh: Office of Information Services of North Carolina
State College of Agriculture and Engineering, 1962) , 410, hereinafter cited as
North Carolina State College Catalog.
Public Addresses and Summaries
269
assistance to farmers and processors alike. A development of this
department is responsible for a totally new food industry being
started. Through the research of Dr. M. W. Hoover^^^ a method
of drying sweet potatoes and pumpkins and transforming them
into flakes was developed. This laboratory project was translated
into full plant operation down in Windsor by produce processors.
A combination of local initiative and outside financial help and
know-how resulted in a successful operation. They also have
plans for developing a white potato flour which could revolution-
ize the food industry. Their pumpkin operation is in full swing
at the present time. You can see that plants such as this can't
depend on leftover produce from the fresh market. Rather they
need the highest quality raw product available.
With a state as large and diverse as North Carolina no one can
keep up with all the things that are happening. Each of us is
generally aware of developments in the area in which we live,
but occasionally very important happenings somewhere else can
pass almost unnoticed. Here's a case in point. In 1958 the Gerber
Company started construction on its huge baby food plant near
Asheville. I was amazed to discover recently that many people
didn't know this plant existed. When this plant was built it took
into account the much publicized population explosion. It had
expansion plans due for completion in 1970. Their North Carolina
operation has been so successful they have already reached the
projected 1970 size. As far as it's available, produce for this plant
is purchased in North Carolina. Farmers grow beets, carrots,
peaches, apples, green beans, and other produce for this plant.
This operation is another excellent example of an industry making
use of the resources of the community. In addition to making
use of the land, it is employing several hundred persons. It is
purchasing related products, such as glass jars and other supplies,
locally. In addition, it is distributing Gerber products produced
in other plants to a ten-state area. One production line of this
operation produces 650 jars of baby food a minute.
In nearby Henderson County a state research farm is exploring
avenues of food production that promise to provide opportunities
for farmers and food processors. One crop on which they are
working is cauliflower, now mostly grown on Long Island. If
the experimental planting is successful— and it appears it will
be— another food crop opportunity will open up for North Caro-
lina farmers.
Another crop on which considerable work is being done is
Maurice W. Hoover, Professor of Food Science at North Carolina State Uni-
versity at Raleigh. North Carolina State College Catalog, 401.
270
Papers of Terry Sanford
beets. These are just some of the tools the state food team is
providing farmers and industry to make food processing more
practical and profitable in North Carolina.
Making use of the assets we have is a very necessary step in our
industrial growth. We aren't going to interest steel mills and
automobile manufacturers in moving their multibillion dollar
operations to North Carolina, at least not overnight. But by
judicious use of the assets we have we can upgrade the economy
of the state tremendously. We have vast areas of land that can
be developed to produce needed agricultural products on the
volume basis necessary for processing. We have good supplies of
labor for food factories; we have good water supply; we have
good plant site availability. Another necessary asset we have
is assurance of the needed capital for establishment of worthwhile
industries.
Recently the peanut industry in the state was given a boost.
Traditionally, peanuts have been thought of on the national
market as a Virginia product because the first large plants were
built in the tidewater section of that state— this in spite of the
fact that North Carolina grows more peanuts than Virginia. Two
years ago a blanching plant was established in Edenton that has
become something of a model for the industry. Millions of pounds
go through this plant a year in wet and dry blanching processes.
There has been a considerable growth of packaging of North
Carolina peanuts in recent months but not as much as we would
like to see. The latest use of this multimillion dollar crop is being
developed by a company down in Duplin. It is manufacturing and
marketing peanut mixes for pies, cakes, and cookies. This is an
example of individual initiative and research being put to work.
All the effort being expanded is not in big plant operation.
Here is a case of a small operator struggling to make a product
saleable. For nearly four years this man has been smoking marlin,
amberjack, dolphin, blues, and other fish so abundant in our
coastal waters. His results have been a prized food, but he just
couldn't make the smoked fish keep long enough to be com-
mercially successful. Now State College has come along with a
chemical answer to that problem. We have more than enough fish
available to supply thousands of such smokehouses in eastern
North Carolina. Good merchandising could make this the multi-
million dollar industry it is in Florida.
One of the seafood products generally associated in the public
mind with New England has a strong foothold in this state. Down
at Williston, Mr. Elmer Willis is processing clams. Other seafoods
being processed that are important to the economy of the state
include a new pasteurized crab meat, shrimp, oysters, and of
Public Addresses and Summaries
271
course, a large variety of fish. North Carolina has the potential
for becoming the national leader in this most important food
source.
Recognizing opportunity when it comes their way is an accepted
condition for the Hartsfield family in Holly Ridge. You can put
their product on fruit cakes. They took advantage of a native
crop— here when Sir Walter Raleigh's colonists arrived— to estab-
lish the only winery in the state. Their principal product is the
scuppernong. In addition to some fourteen acres of vineyards of
their own they buy all the scuppernong grapes they can find and
they still need more. In fact, they set out 30,000 cuttings this
summer which they plan to offer to farmers at cost in an effort
to get them to grow scuppernongs. These are the highest priced
grapes on the American market, and it offers an excellent extra
cash crop. In a normal year a vineyard will gross a thousand dollars
an acre or more. California growers have been in North Carolina
this summer exploring the possibilities for scuppernongs in that
state. The potential for jellies and preserves has never been fully
explored.
A company that has done a splendid job of exploring preserving
possibilities is the Garner Company in Winston-Salem. This is
one of the oldest forms of food processing and one of the most
competitive. The competition is not only from other companies,
but from millions of housewives. First known for its Texas Pete
Hot Sauce, the company now produces thirty kinds of preserves,
jellies, and sauces. It buys most of its raw materials in bulk
from North Carolina frozen food plants. A high degree of auto-
mation, quality control, and technical know-how have made it
possible for this company to produce a superior product that has
distribution over a five-state area. This is a success story that can
be duplicated by those willing to devote time and energy and
imagination.
In this land of plenty not many of us give a great deal of
thought to our food— where it comes from, how it gets to us.
We take for granted the things that millions of people across the
world think about constantly. The bottle of milk, the loaf of
bread, the soft drink, the dried beans, the canned vegetables are
all things most of us can't remember being without— at least not
since the depression. Our children can't remember being without
TV dinners and frozen pies. Another generation will demand
further refinements in food processing.
Twenty years ago North Carolina had to import much of the
fresh milk sold in the state. With the help of the State Department
of Agriculture and State College, dairy herds are much enlarged
and improved. In spite of greatly increased domestic consumption
272
Papers of Terry Sanford
we are now net exporters of milk. All sections of the state have
benefited from this expansion.
A factor in milk production that hasn't received much notice
was a twofold development by the Agriculture Department and
State College. First a new type grass suited to the needs of dairy
cows was developed and found to grow well in North Carolina.
The only difficulty was that milk from cows eating this grass had
an undesirable flavor. The Food Science Division then developed
a machine to remove the objectionable characteristics, but which
retained all the desirable qualities of processed milk. Here again
an industry has taken advantage of changing tastes and demands
to provide a better product.
Another food industry that has grown by leaps and bounds has
been the producing and processing of poultry. The broiler demand
has caused the entire poultry and egg business to expand many
times over with still more room to grow. A plant such as this
Farmers Exchange in Durham processes several thousand chickens
an hour. In addition to those sold on the fresh market, many
more are frozen and shipped to national and even foreign markets.
In fact, one of the greatest opportunities for this burgeoning
industry is the shipment to overseas points through the ports of
Wilmington and Morehead City.
Livestock raising and meat processing are other phases of the
food industry that have become vital parts of our economy and
offer a great opportunity for the state. The large Swift and
Company plant in Wilson is an excellent example of outside
capital seeing an opportunity in North Carolina and taking
advantage of it. Other big packers such as Newbern Provision are
expanding already large operations so they can take care of the
ever increasing food demands.
Swine markets are increasing with the advent of pig parlors and
the more modern methods of hog production. More and more
farmers are feeding out hogs and furnishing packers and curers
with a better product. In fact, the country ham business is be-
coming big business in the state. Tomahawk Farms in Dunn has
a capacity of 10,000 dry-cured hams a week.
Impressive as our progress has been in the last few years we
need to do much more to raise North Carolina from its position
of forty-second in per capita income to a point nearer to the
national average.
Raw food products being shipped out of the state and being
returned as processed food can be reversed in flow so that we
become a net exporter of manufactured food items. We can be
to the food industry what Detroit is to the automobile industry,
and there is more money spent on food than on new cars. The
Public Addresses and Summaries
273
farmer receives less than 40 per cent of the food dollar with the
largest share going to the middleman— the processor. We need
more middlemen in North Carolina to keep this huge source
of income at home.
Let's not kid ourselves. Mama's not going back to the kitchen
to spend five or six hours a day in food preparation when she
can get better, tastier products cheaper than grandma knew. One
of America's improvements in living standards has been brought
about by the emancipation of women from the drudgery of day-
long food preparation. The time has come for us to give mama
what she wants: better food, more easily prepared, and processed
in North Carolina.
Many agencies of the state are co-operating in helping the
farmer and businessman in the co-operative venture of preparing
food items for the shelves of today's pantry. The Extension
Division at State College and the School of Agriculture, under
Dean James, with its new Department of Food Science, are bring-
ing scientific research and enthusiastic promotion to food proc-
essing. The Agriculture Department, under the direction of my
close associate L. Y. "Stag" Ballentine, is taking the lead in finding
ways to keep the family-size farm profitable. Just recently the
Department of Conservation and Development added a three-
man food processing section to its Department of Commerce and
Industry. —
This might be a good time to remind businessmen of North
Carolina that the opportunities in food processing in this state
are not closed. On the contrary, the period of greatest growth is
just beginning. If you need help or advice in starting or enlarging
a food processing plant let us know about it. If you need assistance
in merchandising or if you need to know what to grow and ^vhere
to sell, we'll help you find the answers. Just write to me at the
State Capitol in Raleigh and I'll see that your letter is sent to
the department that has the answers.
During this program we have mentioned the names of just a
few firms and individuals who are doing great work in this field.
We could list ten times the number and still only scratch the
surface. We'd like to pay tribute to all those fine people and
the job they are doing. With all of us working together we can
accomplish all we have the courage to set out to do.
274
Papers of Terry Sanford
ELEVENTH ANNUAL
LEGISLATIVE WORK CONFERENCE
SOUTHERN REGIONAL EDUCATION BOARD
BiLoxi, Mississippi
August 16, 1962
This Legislative Work Conference was planned by the Legis-
lative Advisory Council, the permanent advisory body of the
Southern Regional Education Board. The need for courageous
legislative action was apparent if educational opportunity for
all and quality education at every level was to be provided. The
objectives of the Commission on Goals for Higher Education
in the South were cited; to reach those goals would demand
courage and money. Governor Sanford expressed the opinion
that money was available though it might have to come from new
taxes. He explained that the task of each state was different, but
the report of the board and the goals listed there would serve as
an excellent guide. He then told the group about the establish-
ment in North Carolina of the Commission on Education Beyond
the High School. He urged all states of the South to move forward
without delay.
INTRODUCTION OF SIR EDWARD BOYLE AT THE
THREE HUNDRED AND SEVENTY FIFTH ANNIVERSARY
CELEBRATION OF THE BIRTH OF VIRGINIA DARE
Manteo
August 18, 1962
Gathered at the Waterside Theater in Manteo to commemorate
the birth of the first child born of English parentage in America,
the audience heard Governor Sanford speak of the courage and
daring of the first people to come to the shores of America. He
compared their vision with the vision of man today as he seeks
passage to the stars. The Governor remarked that the course to
the moon could be charted with more certainty than the course
to the New World could have been charted by Sir Walter
Raleigh's ship. The settlement, the birthday, the first airplane
flight were all called "highly important," and this ceremony
recognized the "re-establishment of the common heritage and
common cause of two free nations," England and the United
States. The occasion called attention to the hopes and aims of
Public Addresses and Summaries
275
the free people, and the Governor reminded his audience that
"Those aims were enunciated in a not-too-distant past by Winston
Churchill and Franklin D. Roosevelt." The common bonds of
the two countries were being renewed on this occasion, and
Sanford welcomed the representative of Queen Elizabeth's govern-
ment. Sir Edward Boyle, Minister of Education of Britain. He
spoke of education as a "historically vital force in North Carolina
and . . . the chief goal of the administration. . . After giving
a brief sketch of the career of Sir Edward, the Governor presented
him as the speaker of the evening.
DEDICATION OF INTERSTATE 85 LINK
IN GASTON COUNTY
McAdenville
August 25, 1962
The opening of a new segment of highway would initiate new
economic opportunities for Gaston County, the South Piedmont,
and all of North Carolina, according to remarks made by Gov-
ernor Sanford on this occasion. A good system of roads was part
of state policy, with the result that there had been development
of streets in the largest cities and farm-to-market paved roads in
rural areas. Roads meant commerce and trade and economic
growth; industrial development came because of good schools
and roads which paved the way. In 1961 over a quarter billion
dollars in new plants, with new payrolls of over $117 million and
jobs for 35,000 North Carolinians made for a new-plant growth
of 18.5 per cent, while the national plant investments fell 3 per
cent. In the 1920's, Governors Cameron Morrison and Angus
McLean proposed bond issues to link county seats; in the 1940's,
Governor Kerr Scott realized the necessity of paving rural roads;
these projects led to expansion and prosperity. North Carolina
was, therefore, ready to start building the interstate system under
Governors William B. Umstead and Luther H. Hodges. Governor
Sanford observed that much remained to be done, and that North
Carolina's programs in the fields of industry and agriculture were
dependent on good transportation. America was "pushing toward
new frontiers of economic and human opportunities"; North
Carolina intended "to pave the road to those opportunities."
276
Papers of Terry San ford
DEDICATION OF ROYSTER BUILDING
AT CHERRY HOSPITAL
Goldsboro
September 12, 1962
In his address at the dedication of a new building at Cherry
Hospital, the Governor reminded his audience of the contribution
of Dorothea Dix, who helped convince North Carolina citizens
that they should care for those suffering from mental illness. As
a result of her efforts, the state substituted care for incarceration.
Later, John W. Umstead sold the citizens on the idea of cure
as well as care, proving that an investment in mental health
would pay rich dividends to the state. Sanford said that crusaders
were often called free spenders, but the state had learned that it
was cheaper to cure a man and return him to normal life than
to incarcerate him. The new building at Goldsboro would pay
for itself by making restored lives available to many, by alleviating
anguish, and by offering other tangible benefits. He called atten-
tion to the obligation of citizens to participate in a mental health
program which provided an opportunity to invest in the greatest
resource of all— human life.
ANNUAL REUNION OF AIRBORNE ASSOCIATION
Washington^ D. C.
September 13, 1962
Governor Sanford, addressing the annual reunion of Airborne
Association, referred to the military reserve of the United States
as an effective force. He told of steps taken by President Kennedy
to improve the nation's military posture, but he added that there
was still need for adequate and efficient reserve forces. Discussing
the National Guard, Sanford urged the Pentagon to have a better
understanding of the citizen-soldier, who could not be expected
to give but so much time to military obligations but who should
seek to live up to his responsibilities. After outlining needs and
proposals with regard to the National Guard, Sanford observed
that more was needed than a priority reserve. The governors of
the fifty states, concerned with problems of civil defense, saw the
National Guard playing a vital role in this area. Though it was
primarily an organization to augment the active army and air
force in time of national emergency, the Guard was a state
Public Addresses and Summaries
277
organization, available to governors in times of peace. Sanford
ended with a plea for stability in the National Guard so that it
would not have to fight for its existence with each change of
administration.
METHODIST MEN OF GASTONIA DISTRICT
Polkville
September 13, 1962
[At various times the Governor took the opportunity to express his
philosophy concerning race relations and civil rights. Speaking to the Meth-
odist Men of Gastonia District, Sanford brought up the idea of the Good
Neighbor Council, an idea which was to develop into reality the next year.
See Governor Sanford's press statement of January 18, 1963.]
It is most appropriate that I announce some important plans
at a meeting of church laymen because our most difficult problems
of race differences must be worked out in the spirit of Christian
fellowship.
The situation at highway restaurants has inadvertently delayed
long-range plans on which people of good will have been working
for some months. We must continue to work on these broader
plans because they can have so much real meaning for the people
of the state. In the meantime, you will remember that I have
asked some people to w^ork with both sides of the restaurant
situation. The two matters should not be confused.
The long-range plans center on economic opportunities. There
are three factors involved in my planning:
First, people all over North Carolina, in and out of government,
are working to improve the economy of North Carolina, to lift
us from the forty-second position in per capita income. A major
reason, as Census Bureau figures show, for North Carolina's low
per capita standing is that Negroes do not have adequate economic
opportunities. If we counted the income of white citizens only.
North Carolina would rank thirty-second in per capita income
instead of forty-second.
Second, Negro youths are not taking full advantage of the
technical training available to them. Admittedly, this may be due
to the lack of motivation as a consequence of poor economic
opportunities for qualified Negro workers.
Third, we need always to understand the hopes of all people.
North Carolina has a tradition of good human relations, and
nothing must be permitted to detract from that record.
278
Papers of Terry Sanford
For a long time I have been working on an idea to set up what
I think should be called the North Carolina Good Neighbor
Council. It will take several more weeks to complete the member-
ship of the council but the purposes are too important to be
rushed. It would consist of representatives from all segments of
our economy and all sections of our state. This council would
have as its mission: (1) helping to provide greater economic
opportunities for all North Carolinians; (2) encouraging all
young people to become better educated and better trained; (3)
dealing ^vith problems which require human understanding and
co-operation. It also would work with state agencies and local
groups, which already have been established in some North Caro-
lina towns, and would encourage the establishment in others.
In these days in America, we need to show living proof that
people of different backgrounds and races can Tvork together.
If we are true to our religious heritage in North Carolina and if
we believe the lesson of the parable of the Good Samaritan, we
should help those in need of help. It is as simple as that. But it
is powerful in its capacity to achieve broader opportunities for
everyone, the helped and the helpers alike.
COURT IMPROVEMENTS AMENDMENT TALK
WTVD. Durham
September 28, 1962
In 1868 the General Assembly set up a court system for 1868.
Amendments in 1875 and later provided for various courts, but
the Governor insisted that courts had to be uniform to assure
equal justice. He said the 1961 General Assembly proposed an
amendment on which the people would be asked to vote on
November 6. Sanford referred to North Carolina as a state on the
go, with progress evident in many areas. The Governor invited
people with questions about the court improvement amendment
to write to him and promised that the questions would be
answered. He closed ^vith a plea for a favorable vote for the con-
stitutional change.
SOUTHERN REGIONAL EDUCATION BOARD
Hollywood, Florida
October 1, 1962
Governor Sanford told the Southern Regional Education Board
that the South was emerging from a long economic struggle, that
Public Addresses and Summaries
279
the new era was in evidence, that abundant resources were avail-
able but the question of developing them to their full potential
remained. He stressed the idea that the answer was in quality
education. Each citizen should have the opportunity to learn to
the limit of his ability. New institutions, opportunities for
adult education, and financial support for higher education were
requirements for the South to reach its full potential. Sanford
referred to the great impact of the report of the Commission on
Goals for Higher Education in the South. He urged the governors
to accept their responsibility and use their influence to see that
the recommendations of the report were implemented. He ad-
vised the group to "Tell the people where we stand and what
we must do, and they will provide the support and the means."
"PROBLEMS OF A GOVERNOR" PANEL
SOUTHERN GOVERNORS CONFERENCE
Hollywood, Florida
October 4, 1962
All governors faced a multitude of problems, according to
Governor Terry Sanford, but all knew that they had volunteered
for their jobs. He said that North Carolina had problems of
mutual concern to all states: education, low income, the paving of
highways and secondary roads, the revitalization of agriculture,
prisons and rehabilitation, welfare and hospitals. On this occasion,
however, the Governor talked on the problems of modernizing
the system of justice in North Carolina. In 1955 the North
Carolina Bar Association and lay leaders took a look at the
courts and found that the system of justice had not kept up
with the times— that the system, not the judges or juries or
lawyers or court officials, was at fault. One system, for example,
provided for fees to jaypees for convictions. Over a thousand
lower courts operated with variations in procedures, costs, and
organization. Dockets were crowded. Recommendations made
to the 1959 General Assembly for a constitutional amendment
were defeated, but another proposal was made in 1961 and a
compromise system was accepted by the legislators. The plan was
to be voted on by the people on November 6. The Governor
commented that up-to-date law enforcement required a modern
system, and that the new organization would provide a uniform
system of courts below the level of the superior courts, and would
establish an administrative office to free judges of mechanical
280
Papers of Terry Sanford
details. Because some lower courts had been making big profits,
and because there had been no uniform fee system, the amend-
ment contained provisions to correct these faults. Details regard-
ing the new system were spelled out by Governor Sanford, who
concluded with a reminder that "In a democracy, justice is every-
body's business."
FIRST CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT
DEMOCRATIC RALLY
Edenton
October 9, 1962
The Governor began with an expression of appreciation for
the privilege of participating in the First Democratic District
Rally and with praise for the congressman from the district,
Herbert C. Bonner. He said that Democratic records from the
courthouse to the White House spoke for themselves, and he
reviewed Democratic accomplishments in North Carolina, men-
tioning the program for quality education, industrial expansion,
and revitalization of agriculture. Such a record would force the
opposition to smear tactics and would cause them to talk about
"spending," about a "tw^o-party" system, and about the Demo-
cratic President. Sanford said the First District supported Ken-
nedy in 1960 and the state gave him one of the largest majorities
in the nation. Governor Sanford observed that when they talked
about a "two-party" system, the Republicans ^vanted their own
party's system; and that when they discussed "deficit spending,"
they should remember North Carolina's Triple-A credit rating.
Though North Carolina's Democrats had their differences, the
ties that bound them ^vere stronger than their differences, and the
principles of the Democratic party were "unchanged and un-
changeable." Sanford called the Democratic party the one that
believed in the people, believed in free enterprise, and believed
in helping the weak.
STATE-WIDE SCHOOL DROPOUT MEETING
Raleigh
October 11, 1962
Discussing one of the major problems facing those in the field
of education, the Governor made several comments concerning
Public Addresses and Summaries
281
dropouts. He indicated that the responsibility for keeping chil-
dren in school rested with many individuals, but it was primarily
that of the young person himself. Many factors— difficulties with
reading, failure, monetary problems— entered into the decision
of a child to continue or discontinue his schooling. Nearly half
of those who entered the first grade failed to graduate from high
school. Sanford urged parents, school officials, and all citizens
to help provide the incentive needed to keep young people in
school. He felt that they had to be convinced of the value of an
education and had to realize that by dropping out they robbed
themselves and the state. The Governor referred to this meeting
as a step in the right direction; he suggested that the task, of
taking the program into every North Carolina home and seeing
that every child understand what was at stake, be carried out.
HAYWOOD COUNTY DEMOCRATIC RALLY
Waynesville
October 22, 1962
[The need for court reform in North Carolina was urgent long before
the Sanford administration. The North Carolina Bar Association, in 1955,
began a study of the judicial system of the state and recommended a con-
stitutional amendment to the 1959 General Assembly. Because of differences
of opinion, the proposal was defeated; two years later, after compromises
had been effected, the legislators approved the amendment enthusiastically.
In this address the Governor urged all North Carolinians to ratify the
amendment in the November 6 election; his request was granted by an
overwhelming vote in favor of the issue.]
The improvement of our courts is one of the most vital issues
to face the people of North Carolina since 1868. We now have the
opportunity to establish a uniform state-wide court system. You
can join in making this possible.
The time is here for those who like the idea of equal justice
for all— whether they live in the mountains of western North
Carolina or the Piedmont or on the Coastal Plains of eastern
North Carolina, the big city or the small community— to get
interested.
As you know, action of the 1961 session of the General
Assembly permits us to vote on this proposed amendment. If
we approve it, every family in North Carolina will benefit. If
we do not, the cause of court improvement in our state will have
suffered such a tremendous blow that it could well be another
generation before North Carolinians would have such an oppor-
tunity again.
282
Papers of Terry Sanford
What would this amendment do? We often hear that it is
difficult for laymen to understand the courts, that everything
said or written on judicial matters is so complicated that only
lawyers know what it is all about. This certainly is not true in
this case, for the plan for court improvement which will be sub-
mitted to the people in November is simple and clear.
I am a lawyer by profession and I respect the profession.
But let me say right here, the courts of the state don't belong
exclusively to lawyers and they don't belong to judges. Courts
belong to all the people.
This amendment is strongly supported by most lawyers and
most judges.
But the amendment was approved in a General Assembly by
lawmakers, most of whom are not lawyers.
And the "jury" which will determine its fate are all of the
citizens of North Carolina.
The court improvement amendment goes straight to the place
where changes are needed most and where the majority of our
citizens have their only court experience— to the lower courts,
those beneath the Superior Court level— and groups them into
a uniform system. It also establishes an administrative office to
free judges of vexing mechanical details and assist in the busi-
ness management of the courts.
The proposed amendment is not something which was de-
veloped overnight. It resulted from the co-operation of many of
North Carolina's public spirited citizens who studied our courts,
prepared recommendations for making the administration of
justice what it should be in this progressive state, and worked
together as private citizens and as members of the legislature to
devise a program which would give our citizens the kind of
administration of justice they have a right to expect.
The court study which formed the foundation from which
the proposed amendment evolved was made by a group of lead-
ing lawyers and laymen who undertook this job seven years ago.
Many thousands of man-hours were spent in getting the facts
and preparing recommendations. This committee found that we
had approximately 1,400 so-called lower courts, including the
recorder-type and special courts and justices of the peace. Operat-
ing as separate units, these courts had different costs, practices,
and procedures. A man tried for an offense in one county might,
for instance, be charged $36.00 in costs, while someone in an
adjoining county might have costs of $8.00 for an identical
offense.
The committee found also that some local courts were making
big profits. In the case of justices of the peace, we were reminded
Public Addresses and Summaries
283
that they were paid for their services only upon conviction and
that these officers often were chosen in a way which did not
necessarily require that they be suited to their jobs. Without
supervision and in many cases not qualified to dispense justice,
they quite frequently proved to be unfit for their responsibilities.
There definitely is, however, a place for honest, capable justices
of the peace in the administration of justice. We have many of
these. The amendment would establish this proper place for
them by bringing them into the district courts as officers of the
court and giving them and those who have business with them
the advantages which will result from having their work super-
vised.
The amendment would abolish the method of basing their
pay on convictions, for they would be paid for their services on
a fair plan.
Just how essential it is that the present system for selecting
magistrates be changed is indicated in the fact that under the
present law, each township is entitled to three magistrates, with
one additional for every 1,000 people living in an incorporated
city or town.
A large city such as Charlotte would be entitled to elect 204
justices of the peace under this plan. Think of how easy it might
be for some completely unfit candidate to be elected by the simple
act of voting for himself. And what is true in Charlotte is true in
towns and cities across North Carolina.
The amendment provides that the state be divided into a con-
venient number of local court districts by the General Assembly.
The General Assembly also will prescribe where the district
courts shall sit, but one must sit in at least one place in each
county. Judges of these courts will be elected for each district
for terms of four years. It is provided that every district judge
shall live in the district for which he is elected. Thus, each
county will have at least one seat of a district court, and there
will be more if needed. The number of judges serving a district
will be determined by the General Assembly on the basis of the
need.
This, then, is the court improvement program we will vote
on in November. It does away with the glaring evils that have
existed and paves the way for a modern, efficient system of courts
in which the administration of justice is uniform in practice,
procedures, and costs, is not delayed by inefficiencies resulting
from lack of proper administration, and is of a high standard
because it is administered by well-qualified persons.
I wonder how many of you have thought seriously about our
courts. Although many citizens may never have to go to court,
284
Papers of Terry Sanford
the well-being of all citizens depends to a large extent on the
quality of the administration of justice in our state.
For example, one of the most serious problems in our state
today is the deadly toll we suffer through automobile accidents.
Experts in traffic safety tell us that the right kind of traffic courts
is the only basic answer to this problem. We can do more by
handling violators of highway safety regulations in a modern,
scientific way in the courts than through any other program or
plan. Judges who are able to become expert in traffic matters
would protect you and your family from the dangerous driver
and convince those who are good, careful, safe drivers 99 per cent
of the time of the importance of extending this performance
through that extra 1 per cent.
Think of the lives that would be saved and the losses in money
and usefulness that could be avoided by reducing the number
and severity of traffic accidents! It can be done better than any
other way through the proper handling of traffic offenders in
court, and this proper handling can come to North Carolina if
we approve the amendment as the first step.
We read and hear every day of new tragedies on our highways.
Last year there were 1,254 deaths in the 100 counties in our state.
This year the slaughter continues. No matter what else we try
to do, we are not going to make our roads as safe as we can
make them until we have an efficient, state-wide system of courts
presided over by able, safety-minded judges. Just recently I read
an editorial deploring the high accident record in a North Caro-
lina county. The editor said:
There is no doubt but what the pubhc can do but so much about traffic
accidents. There must be respect for the laws, and this can only be created
by the courts. . . . One weak link here is the lack of a uniform court sys-
tem. This can be remedied by voting in the Constitutional Amendment in
November. There is little hope for justice as long as the fee system for the
justices of the peace is continued. The courts should not be set up to make
a profit, but to administer justice. Only when traffic cases get quick action,
tried when the witnesses are there, and under uniform system can the
public hope to correct abuses.
This statement is repeated in substance many times a day by
thoughtful, informed people across North Carolina.
All of us know the problem and the answer. You are in a
position to understand especially well the operation and structure
of the courts and your leadership from now to November can
help assure for North Carolina the uniform system of courts
that is so essential to the protection of your family and the mem-
bers of every family in the state.
The question facing all North Carolinians on November 6
is this:
Public Addresses and Summaries
285
Do we want to give the judges, the solicitors, the attorneys, the
plaintiffs, the defendants, the juries, and the law enforcement
officers the tools to provide equal and exact justice in the second
half of the twentieth century?
Do we, the citizens of North Carolina, want to try to maintain
justice in a T-model system, or are we going to do it in a system
that recognizes more modern times?
In a democracy, justice is everybody's business. That's why
this court improvement is important to every citizen.
NORTH CAROLINA STATE GRANGE CONVENTION
KiNSTON
October 26, 1962
Governor Sanford told an appreciative audience that the State
Grange had contributed substantially to the progress of North
Carolina. Qualified agricultural leaders had been placed in key
policy positions so that farm people would have a strong voice in
state government. Such men as Kerr Scott and his son. Bob Scott,
both of whom had served as masters of the State Grange, were
cited as notable leaders of both the state and this particular
organization. As he outlined some of the goals of the organization,
the Governor called its program an ambitious one. He said state
government was also trying to promote opportunities through
education, observing that the rural population stood to gain most
from increased educational opportunities. Good roads needed to
be built, water resources to be guarded, flood control to be
studied, and new industry to be attracted; these programs would
complement those in the field of agriculture and would benefit
the rural people. Because a balanced program of education, agri-
culture, and industry would pay rich dividends to all, Sanford
called on members of the State Grange to help keep North Caro-
lina going forward.
REPORT TO THE PEOPLE OVER
STATE-WIDE TELEVISION AND RADIO NETWORKS
Raleigh
October 31, 1962
[Civil defense was a matter of grave concern in October, 1962. Though
President Kennedy's firm action in seeking to eliminate Russian missiles
286
Papers of Terry Sanford
from Cuba did not trigger militant repercussions, national tension had
mounted and the realities of defense were uppermost in the minds of citi-
zens throughout the United States. The Cuban crisis soon diminished, but
the need for adequate civil defense preparations continued; and the Gov-
ernor encouraged North Carolinians to prepare for a lifetime of crises. The
state's concern for civil defense preparations had been shown in a dramatic
way some months earlier. In April, 1961, Mr. and Mrs. Thomas C. McAden
were chosen from many applicants to test a fall-out shelter at the Gov-
ernor's Mansion. Living in simulated wartime conditions for three days, the
Charlotte couple reported regularly to the public on the problems of survival
in event of nuclear attack.]
President Kennedy has taken bold steps to eliminate Russian
missiles from Cuba. His success could very well be the turning
point in the cold war. The Cuban crisis may be over but the cold
war continues, and we are "destined ... to live out most, if not
all, of our lives in uncertainty and challenge and peril. . . ." The
intense danger during the Cuban crisis could arise again at any
time. To use this experience to urge greater preparedness, I
want to talk with you about what we are doing in North Caro-
lina and what you can do to protect your family and yourself.
If our civil defense is good enough to save the lives of most of
you, then the chances of any enemy attack are reduced. So, good
civil defense is vital to us personally, to our nation's diplomacy,
and to the American defense.
There has been and will be no reason for panic and no need
for hysteria in North Carolina. We are prepared, and we are
strong, and we know what to do.
In North Carolina we can have 8,000 National Guardsmen
on duty within thirty minutes. Within sixty minutes we could
have 11,400 Guardsmen ready for action. Standing orders for
this purpose already have been issued by the Governor's Office
and company alert and mobilization plans have been polished to
perfection. Your National Guardsmen are trained and disciplined
and prepared to act immediately on orders demanded by any
situation. This is only a part of our readiness. We have other
groups and agencies poised to move into action.
Civil defense rests with the civilians, and we have thousands
who have prepared themselves to be ready, and the entire state
is grateful for their devotion.
We have a state civil defense director, five area directors, and
local directors in ninety-eight counties. The job of these people
should not be misunderstood. They are not in possession of
magic devices to take over our protection in time of emergency.
In time of preparation, which is now, they serve as advisers to
government leaders. They also serve as "promoters of civil
defense," and for a number of years they have been trying to
Public Addresses and Summaries
287
get more of you interested in civil defense. In time of emergency
they serve as the staff for the elected heads of cities, counties, and
the state, supervising communications, gathering information,
and assisting as a staff assists a wartime commander.
It is important to remember that the responsibilty to get ready
for emergency action and to direct activities during an emergency
rests with the elected officials. All county and city officials have a
civil defense mission and responsibility, and you can help them.
Civil defense is not for the purpose of planning ways of hiding,
but rather for ways of protecting and strengthening and con-
tinuing the productive capacity of our people.
The question is how to withstand the initial assault, then get
up and keep going.
Thousands of people in almost every county have worked to
formulate state and local emergency plans. We have tested the
readiness of our Emergency Operational Plans.
At the state level for state-wide emergency communications we
have nine radio systems. These are RACES, the Radio Amateur
Organization with over 1,500 volunteer operators, the splendid
radio system of the Civil Air Patrol, the State Highway Patrol
Radio System functioning as our Civil Defense Radio Warning
Network on a twenty-four hour per day basis, the Highway Com-
mission Radio Network, the State Forestry Radio Network, Wild-
life Commission Radio System, the National Guard Radio Net-
work and the Radio Units of the Prisons System and SBI.
Reporting normal enemy or emergency activity will follow
traditional patterns, but reporting fall-out is more complicated.
We are prepared to do a complete job here. The Board of Health
has been given the radiological monitoring and testing equip-
ment. It has trained people and will keep a state situation map
from information constantly supplied by several thousand trained
monitors. This information will be passed on to the public by
radio.
The State Board of Health also is assigned the responsibility
for all health measures, and many hospitals have formulated
emergency plans. In addition, we have thirty-five complete 200-
bed emergency hospitals stored across the state which, if needed,
we can move on short notice.
The Highway Patrol is a strong arm in any emergency; this
has been demonstrated during hurricanes. They work with local
police and sheriffs.
Rescue squads and rural fire departments are a part of local
civil defense, and frequently the center of it. Fire, police, and
public works departments are a part of every mayor's emergency
plans.
288
Papers of Terry Sanford
Every other state agency has a mission for the emergency.
Every basic industry, such as fuels, building materials, food, has
a plan for making its resources available.
I haven't time in a limited broadcast to tell you everything, but
here is the state plan, 4i/^ inches thick, and 8i/^ feet of county
and city plans, showing that all of the many details have been
worked out.
There are plans worked out at most schools. This is a responsi-
bility of the local school board, with advice from civil defense.
You parents may check in advance on the plans at the school your
children attend. Your principal, superintendent, or school board
members can talk with you abort this.
Many of you have asked about evacuation plans. Evacuation
is not as likely as it was several years ago because of changed
concept of warfare, and it is not as important in North Carolina
as it is in New York. If the situation demanded evacuation,
however, we are organized to effect it. Routes and control of
the flow of traffic are established. Private transportation would
be expected, but mass transportation also would be available.
Trucking, bus, and rail companies have plans for making their
resources available for this, as well as other transportation needs.
If evacuation is indicated, you will be given the necessary infor-
mation by radio, and other available means, and local civil
defense agencies have plans and resources to receive people
evacuated from other areas. Unless you are specifically advised to
evacuate, your safest place would be to remain where you have
some protection from possible radiation.
This is what I consider the weakest point of our plans for
civil defense: survival in fall-out. This is really the most difficult
question to answer— protection from radiation— because nobody
in this country or any other country quite knows the answer.
I'm going to try to answer it, as well as I can, from the thousands
of pages which have been written about it, as it applies to North
Carolina today, with the understanding that we do not claim
to have the perfect answer. We will do the best we can with what
we have today, and we will improve later when we know more.
In North Carolina we can assume four things:
1) It would be very wise for everybody to know in advance
where he and his family would go to avoid fall-out radiation.
2) There are many, many people who cannot afford even a
fifty-dollar shelter.
3) People are unduly afraid of things they don't know much
about, and they don't know much about fall-out.
4) It is hard to get people interested in shelters until they need
one.
Public Addresses and Summaries
289
Now with these four understandings, let's see what is the best
we can do.
First, what is fall-out, and what is the danger? They've written
books about this, but let's try to boil it down.
Little particles of sand, water, and other material blown sky
high by a nuclear explosion float down and are moved about by
the winds. Because these particles were involved in the nuclear
explosion they continue to give off radiation for a period, which
will grow less and less as it burns out or "decays." The greatest
danger would be for about twenty-four to forty-eight hours, but
some danger might continue for a week or so. Obviously places
very near the explosion would remain dangerous for many weeks.
Our fall-out reporting service would keep you informed by radio
and other means about local radiation.
While these particles are floating down they can fall out any-
where that dust or sand or rain can blow. Once they are settled,
radiation from the particles is concentrated at the surface where
they rest. Radiation travels in a straight line. So everything you
can put between you and the surface of radioactive particles is
that much more protection for you.
You will have some time between the warning and the danger,
but this will depend on the distance, the wind, the size and the
nature of the explosion. This time would range from less than
an hour to several hours. We have the machinery to predict this
with fair accuracy. This information would be passed on to you
by CONELRAD radio stations, and other means.
You can stand some radiation like that from the sun throughout
life and medium radiation for brief periods. Radiation can cause
severe sickness but it is not necessarily fatal.
Fall-out cannot make things it falls on radioactive. Vegetables
in the field, or exposed food anywhere, are contaminated only
to the extent they might have particles on them and can be made
safe by washing, brushing or peeling. Livestock will receive fair
protection in barns under most circumstances. If particles get
on you or your clothing they can be washed off.
You should make it your business to learn more about fall-out,
and you can get an authoritative bulletin from your local or state
civil defense office.
Now what kind of fall-out shelter do you need? You might
have the right to use one of the marked, standard shelters in the
urban areas. This varies so much from city to city that I sug-
gest you see your mayor's civil defense director; and I urge all
industry and building owners to co-operate in the marking of
such shelters.
You may have built, or desire to build, a complete family
290.
Papers of Terry San ford
shelter, and plans for this may be obtained from your local
civil defense office.
If you can't do this, as many North Carolinians cannot, here
are some things to know:
Two feet of solid concrete or three feet of earth will give you
almost absolute protection. Your imagination, a shovel, some
boards or logs, can give you some pretty good protection, without
spending any money. We called them foxholes in World War II.
You can get a bulletin from your local civil defense office on
different kinds of fall-out shelters.
Solid concrete blocks can be stacked for fall-out protection. If
you aren't willing to build such a shelter now, at least let me urge
you to have these materials ready.
If you get in the basement of an ordinary brick veneer home
you will reduce your danger to one-tenth of the danger outside.
A little fixing would give you better protection. One-tenth might
still be too great. If you don't have a basement and get in the
middle of such a home you will reduce the danger by about one-
half.
Water is the number-one necessity to store. You should at least
have some jugs or fruit jars on hand. You can be sure you have
a faucet on your hot water tank, which is a ready-made emergency
storage tank. You should have canned or packaged food, includ-
ing juices which do not need to be refrigerated. You should have
a radio which will run if the electricity goes off. You should
have a flashlight. Other things you may need are listed in this
civil defense pamphlet.
Some people will not take full protection in advance. I'm
afraid human nature doesn't work that way. But you can take
some of the protection, and you can get ready for additional
action, even if for various reasons you do not make more com-
plete preparations now. And you can understand the dangers
better.
Let me make it clear that I think you should provide as much
protection as you possibly can. Remember the first assumption:
It would be very wise for everybody to know in advance where
he and his family would go to avoid fall-out radiation.
This is not the complete story, but it is the heart of it.
We have people all over the state anxious to give you more
information.
The best way not to need this protection is to have it.
I would hope that we never have any reason to recoil from any
situation in fear. Civil defense is not based on fear. It is based
on confidence in our strength, our knowledge, our ability to
protect our nation and ourselves.
Public Addresses and Summaries
291
This nation, founded on freedom, holding aloft the banner
for free people around the globe, with an abiding faith in God
and His purpose for man, will endure so long as our spirit and
our faith endure.
VETERANS DAY CEREMONY ON
BATTLESHIP U.S.S. "NORTH CAROLINA"
Wilmington
November 11, 1962
In observance of Veterans Day, 1962, a ceremony was held on
the battleship U.S.S. "North Carolina." The Governor referred
to the Cuban crisis as a recent event but as a crisis which had
subsided. He referred to areas of conflict and communism else-
where: Berlin, the Himalayas of India, Viet Nam, the Congo,
but the Governor said the order of the day was peace. The fact
that the United States sought peace did not mean that its citizens
would not fight for freedom. America, he said, "does not fear
to negotiate" but would "never negotiate out of fear." Sanford
expressed hope that Communists would see the lesson written
in the blood of history. While military posts were necessary, the
ultimate strength was in education. There was no question about
America's willingness to fight and die but there was a question
as to her willingness to take the leadership in defending America's
"ancient heritage" on the education, industrial, and agricultural
fronts. The battle of the free world was being fought in the
United Nations; military might had to be kept strong, but it
was also imperative for America to do her best in education,
industry, and agriculture. Sanford said the veterans did not end
their jobs when they removed their uniforms; their duty con-
tinued—"until all children have the chance for education, until
all people everywhere have enough to eat and enough clothes to
keep them warm; until mankind is free from fear, from want, and
from dictatorship."
292
Papers of Terry Sanford
FOUNDERS DAY CELEBRATION AT
METHODIST COLLEGE
Fayetteville
November 15, 1962
[Speaking in his home town of Fayetteville, Governor Sanford took the
opportunity to present his program in the field of higher education for the
1963 General Assembly. He explained that he planned to emphasize quality
education on the college level. This speech, entitled "Education Is the Only
Path to Progress," was considered the administration's blueprint for the
years ahead; it was later issued as a pamphlet.]
Several days ago a friend asked me, "What can a poor man do
for his children when it is time to send them to college? I can't
afford it," he said, "but college is what they need and deserve."
My answer is that North Carolina must say to the young
people of the state, "If you have the will and the skill you can
go to college." We must make it our policy to provide the class-
rooms, to establish the loan funds, to employ the college teachers,
and to have the teaching facilities and everything needed to match
the ambitions of our youth.
We could pose this question another way, asking, "What can
a state, one which is not as rich as most others, do about edu-
cation beyond the high school?" Quality education costs money,
yet it is what the state needs and deserves, what it must have if
it is going to get ahead. Education is the way we have of climb-
ing upward, one generation after another. It is the best hope we
have that our children will be better able to make a better living
and have a good life and meet the needs of their own day.
We go about this through use of teachers, books, pencils. Bun-
sen burners, educational television, blackboards, and countless
other things. What we are going about, however, is a matter of
the mind and wealth of each individual, and of us all as mem-
bers of a family of man called North Carolinians.
There are other families of man scattered throughout the world
who have not given their people the chance for education, and
they are poor and depressed as a people. They have been left
behind in technology, in statesmanship, in all development. Their
people live in poverty and some of them actually are starving.
Millions of these people live in hovels and shacks and slums,
beyond the attention of doctors and beyond the protection of
laws. The efforts of some of these people to rise from this con-
dition are among the most dramatic and painful of our time.
We in the South, and in North Carolina, were in a state of
poverty once, too. We have all heard that our country has never
Public Addresses and Summaries
293
lost a war; that's so, but North Carolina has. We lost the bloodiest
war in this country's history, and one of the bloodiest wars ever
fought anywhere. Today stories of that war seem incredible to us.
I was reminded of that recently when I made a talk in Florida
on the subject of education. When I returned to Raleigh, a friend
asked me if I realized that in December, 1903, Governor Charles
Brantley Aycock had made a talk in Florida on the same subject.
I had not remembered that, and I got down a biography of
Aycock and found the text. In 1903, Aycock was two generations
closer to the pain of that war than we, and I found he was
obliged to be much more gloomy about the South than I had
been in my Florida talk. "Today it seems to me," he said back
then, "that we have less effect upon the thought and action of
the nation than at any period of our history." His was a day
when the South was trying to rid itself of the squalor of the
Reconstruction period, when, as he said, "lawlessness stalked the
State like a pestilence, death walked abroad at noonday, sleep
lay down armed. ..." We had lost a war, then had lost control of
our government, and during it all we had lost our sense of
well-being as a people. All this had happened to a people who
before had often been distinguished. We had not been wealthy,
but we had sometimes known outstanding leadership. Many a
schoolboy can recite the great, grave names of the southern men
who stood at the head of this nation in days when their leader-
ship was not only the distinguishing mark of our country but a
distinguishing mark of their time in the world. In our own state,
poor as it was, we had at Chapel Hill the second largest uni-
versity in America, second to Princeton. We had a public school
system which stayed open even during the war. We had 50,000
students in attendance during the height of the fighting.
The war left North Carolina with sons to bury and others to
mend; it left us with fallen houses and fences and sheds and
cribs, and with the sense of despondency which inevitably follows
the failure of a cause. Then came the bitter days of sorry leader-
ship, a period of poverty, and of bad feelings between the races.
Finally, out of this unwholesomeness, near the turn of the
century, came a group of progressive men. One of them was
Charles Brantley Aycock. He said that North Carolina had a
great destiny ahead. He told them what many of them didn't
want to hear— that the people must tighten their belts and put
their money into education, education for everybody. "You
wealthy people may educate your son and daughter to the fullest
extent possible," he said in his address in Florida, "giving them
the learning of all the world, and after their education put them
in a community where there are no other educated people, and
294
Papers of Terry Sanford
they will fail to develop and grow as they would if they lived in
a community where there was general culture. . . . We want the
schools to find all of the strongest and best in competition one
with the other until the fullest power of each shall be developed."
He fought for education, believing education to be the only
basic way to build a state and prepare for a better life. For four
years while he was governor, the state built schoolhouses on the
average of one a day. He left office unpopular and died almost
repudiated; but the people supported education, and because
they did, North Carolina began to move forward. Progress came
grudgingly and painfully, but it came, until now, two generations
later, we have before us opportunities for leadership such as
North Carolina has not known in decades.
The nature of these opportunities was suggested while I
stood in Florida a few weeks ago, watching a rocket fired into
space. This is symbolic of the time and place we have inherited.
Our farms and cities are changing so fast that often the changes
cannot be followed. Brick by brick, concrete on steel, wood and
glass, pressed wood and plastic— we are building houses and
factories, barns and cities that are better, cleaner, stronger, safer.
And as this new age comes on, our country is turning to the
South more and more. Our state finds itself with labor ready
to go to work, with raw materials ready to be used, with power
lines and gas lines in place; our roads are in; our railroads are
ready. We have space here for expansion. We have a sound
public school system. We have ports and are near markets. We
are today ready for progress of a new order if we have the people
educated to today's needs. To move into the mainstream of
American life is our present calling, the newborn challenge.
The way we have to follow to make the best of this challenge
is the way Aycock suggested to our grandfathers: the way of edu-
cation for all the people. Education is the one way proved solid
and firm and ready for the use of this state. There is only one
way we in our history have found fully dependable, education
for all people to the limits of their ability.
So the message of Charles Brantley Aycock of fifty-nine years
ago is the message of today. The only difference is that our new
world demands more education than did his.
Going from school district to school district, in recent months,
talking to young people, and listening, I hear from them that
they understand the challenges of our time, often better than we
adults do. Most of them want to develop themselves well enough
not only to keep up, but to contribute to the making of the
future. Even little children have caught the breath of ambition.
More of our students realize that they must finish high school
Public Addresses and Summaries
295
and go on to college. Their ambition, which is one of the most
valuable resources of this state, is one reason the college tide is
swelling. Another reason is that we simply have more young
people of college age today than ever before. We have almost
twice as many students in college now as only ten years ago, and
the choices for study and the subjects of study are twice as com-
plex.
In order to try to keep ahead of the growing, complex need
for education, well over a year ago I appointed twenty-five citizens
to a commission— the Commission on Education Beyond the
High School, with able and experienced Irving E. Carlyle as
chairman. A few weeks ago the members turned in to me their
report, a comprehensive document, based on study and deliber-
ation of many months.
From this study we can devise the North Carolina Master
Plan for education beyond the high school.
private colleges
It is fitting and appropriate that I speak of advances in public
education on the campus of a private church-related college.
The Commission Report is careful to point out that "nothing
that we are proposing is calculated to impair the ability of the
private institutions to serve the purposes for which they exist.
We want to see the private institutions flourish and increase
their capacity to provide their own unique contribution to the
task of educating the people of North Carolina."
Indeed it is the sound policy of the state of North Carolina
to encourage private institutions in every way. Except for the
university, higher education began in the church-related colleges
in the first half of the last century at Guilford, Trinity, Wake
Forest, and others. I do not want to see their influence diminished
in any degree, and I hope that all churches will increase the
financial support they give their colleges.
Personally, I have long and strongly believed that America
would not have grown great in moral strength had it not been
for the influence of the church colleges. To this mission I have
done all that I know how to do, and when I put down the official
duties of my present office I intend to occupy a major part of my
spare time to the building of this private, church college on
whose campus we meet today and whose Board of Trustees I
am honored to serve as chairman.
We need the influence of these private colleges and we need
their advice. I was asked to create the mechanics whereby the
private colleges could work together with the state, to give the
benefit of their ideas to the Governor and the Board of Higher
296
Papers of Terry Sanford
Education, as to how we might improve the total of education
and how we might assist in proper ways the development and
operation of the private colleges. This ^ve are doing, and we
look forward to a fruitful partnership.
COMMUNITY COLLEGES
By the end of this decade young people seeking admission to
college in North Carolina will exceed the present capacity of
public colleges plus the planned capacity of private colleges by
more than 31,000. This means that the majority of these young
people will have no college opportunity unless we plan and act
now. This figure might be disputed, and indeed has been dis-
puted, but it cannot be denied that the figure, whatever, will
be staggering; neither can it be disputed that the figure would be
even higher if ^ve did ^^vhat we should do to encourage the per-
centage of our high school students to attend college which equals
the national percentage. The Report reminds us: "In a day when
some kind of post-high school training is essential to any sort
of profitable employment, North Carolina cannot afford the
'economy' of sending a smaller percentage of our young people
to college than do four-fifths of the 50 states."
How can we provide the college opportunities for these young
North Carolinians, without which both they and the state ^vill
wither? Our problem today might be summarized as too few
classrooms, too little money, too little time. W^e cannot build
adequate colleges in the traditional pattern; ^ve don't have the
money. If we did, too many students could not attend college in
the traditional pattern; they don't have the money. We need
college opportunities, in large numbers, of high quality, prepar-
ing students for additional college, or preparing students for life
and work without additional college. We need this at low cost,
quickly, and the students need low tuition charges.
With this need, what can ^ve plan? W^e already have in our
state the community college concept, and ^ve have the industrial
education center concept, having tried the former on a limited
basis and the latter on a rapidly expanding basis. We know
how these work, what they can do, ^vhom they will reach.
There is consensus amonsf outstandino^ educators with exten-
sive experience in the community junior college field that, on
principle, the community college should be comprehensive, incor-
porating in an institution three things: appropriate technical-
vocational ^vork, college parallel studies, and adult education
curriculums, all three being responsive to the changing needs of
the area served by the college. These should be in commuting
distance, and we should never anticipate building dormitories
Public Addresses and Summaries
297
at these institutions.
We have the framework and the experience. It could be done
rapidly, it would be relatively low in cost, and it would reach
the greatest possible number of students. It would be less costly
to the student.
This, then, will be our plan: One system of public two-year
post high school institutions offering college parallel studies,
technical-vocational-terminal work, and adult education instruc-
tion tailored to area needs, subject to state-level supervision by
the State Board of Education, and advised by a proposed State
Community College Advisory Council (consisting of at least
seven persons, appointed by the State Board of Education) .
The details will be arranged by the members of the 1963 Gen-
eral Assembly, and for this purpose I commend to them Chapter
VIII of the Report of the Commission on Education Beyond the
High School, which chapter I endorse in toto.
This broad recommendation needs a word of caution. We
will require more comprehensive community colleges than we
can immediately establish. It will take several years to do the
job properly because we cannot start everywhere at once. Priority
should be given to communities where there is a demonstrated
need, where there is clearly demonstrated community interest,
and where public schools are already adequately supported by
local supplements.
I am suggesting to the State Board of Education that there be
prepared immediately "tentative criteria and procedures" for
establishment of these colleges, so that interested communities
might know what they can do to establish one of these colleges.
I would trust that the General Assembly would provide the
legislative standards for the establishment of these colleges,
leaving the locations to the Board of Education.
With a system of comprehensive community colleges we will
be able to meet the total need, to challenge even more high school
graduates to continue their learning, to raise the technical
competence of our people, to improve the level of an educated
citizenry, to increase our income, to provide enrichment for the
lives of those who otherwise would be passed by, and to grow
in stature as a state and a people.
the public senior colleges
We now have nine public senior colleges located from Cullo-
whee to Pasquotank. In addition, we have three other insti-
tutions, ready and able— or almost able— to become public senior
colleges in Asheville, Charlotte, and Wilmington.
It would be difficult to measure the tremendous contributions
298
Papers of Terry Sanford
made today by our senior colleges. Traveling many times to
many places across the state, you can begin to realize the enrich-
ment given by them as you visit the schools in the mountains,
and see leader after leader, teacher after teacher, sent out by
Western Carolina; as you talk to the graduating class of Appa-
lachian and experience the wholesome enthusiasm of these young
people going out to add to the hope and progress of the edu-
cation of their state; as you feel the surge of new intellectual life
at Greenville; as you see obstacles battered down and barriers
overridden at Winston-Salem, and Fayetteville, and Elizabeth
City; as you see new and needed leadership emerging from the
Agricultural and Technical College and North Carolina College;
as you sense the promise at Wilmington, Pembroke, Charlotte,
and Asheville. These things and more demonstrate daily the
faith and vision of the people who have poured their lives into
the making of our state colleges. Our colleges, public and private,
need to obtain a new and higher mark of excellence as they
train teachers and others who in turn will lead us to greater
excellence.
We have not been able to support the acquisition of adequate
faculties at those institutions, but we are financially able now
and we are on the road to correcting this.
These institutions are the great hope for the majority of our
students who will earn degrees, and they must be equal to the
best in quality and excellence.
The institutions understand, as Davidson College understands,
that you do not need to become gigantic, nor do you need to
cover the field with graduate and professional training, to achieve
distinction.
There is sometimes an inclination to make every junior college
a four-year college and every college a university, but this is vain
and foolish. A good college is far better and of far more influence
than a sorry university. We cannot do without our four-year
colleges and we cannot afford to have them second-rate.
The future plans of Asheville-Biltmore, Charlotte, and Wil-
mington are that they expand to four-year colleges. The need is
there and they have the academic strength for such expansion.
As to when, I would hope the General Assembly would delegate
this to the judgment of the Board of Higher Education, based
solely on educational considerations. As to how, the commission
has thought through this and has outlined excellent procedures
in the Report. It would seem to me that each should be given
target dates as soon as possible so that they might start the sound
approaches required.
I hope the General Assembly, the Board of Higher Education,
Public Addresses and Summaries
299
the college trustees, administration, and faculties will consider
carefully the many concrete recommendations of the Commission
on Education Beyond the High School, covering standards, admis-
sions, finances, training teachers, research, counseling, student
costs, remedial noncredit programs, dropouts, endowments, aca-
demic freedom, student loans, the trimester, co-operation, and
general improvement.
the university
North Carolina has always appreciated its university, now a
threefold campus, whose presence has spurred such institutions
as Wake Forest and Duke to greater achievement and in turn
has been spurred on to greater effort by their achievement.
It has attracted industry, developed our mental hospitals, dis-
covered improved products of agriculture, nourished our schools,
enriched our lives, and made us money.
The Report of the Commission recommends two things. First
it points out that "the statutes do not contain an adequate
definition of Consolidated University purposes." It would clarify
the definition and this makes sense. This recommendation will be
presented to the General Assembly as suggested in the Report.
Second, the commission also recommends "that the statutes be
amended to authorize the Consolidated University Board of
Trustees to establish additional campuses of the University under
conditions prescribed" by the Board of Higher Education, sub-
ject to applicable statutory procedures. I think this is going to be
necessary in a growing, complex industrial state, and probably
we should make a start next year. This proposal will also be
presented to the General Assembly.
It is worth repeating "two observations about the Consolidated
University and the future. First, as a simple matter of economics,
the State now and for the foreseeable future can afford only one
university, and that one should be the best that intelligent leader-
ship can build. . . . [Emphasis mine.]
"Second, new campuses of the Consolidated University should
be established only where there is a clear need for the University
programs in graduate and professional fields that only a uni-
versity should offer."
The university is moving forward in many ways. There are
things to be done, plans to be accomplished which have been
spelled out by the president and the chancellors, the Commission
Report, the trustees, the Board of Higher Education, the Advisory
Budget Commission. These plans and this interest promise new
advancement and new rewards to North Carolina. They deserve
active support from all, because they will play a major role in
300
Papers of Terry San ford
meeting our state's need for education of the finest order. This
is no time for division, for jealousy, for disunity.
The trustees of the University of North Carolina need to make
some basic decisions. The wise vision of Governor O. Max
Gardner in consolidating our university facilities over thirty
years ago needs reaffirmation by us today. Our system of uni-
versity education will be best met by unity of purpose, pooling in
a more meaningful way the great resources which have been
assembled at Raleigh, Chapel Hill, and Greensboro, with one
function, one board of trustees, one president, one name. Should
it be the University of North Carolina at Raleigh adding arts
and sciences and taking leadership in the space age? Should it
be the University of North Carolina at Greensboro broadening
its purpose to include more graduate work and men students?
These changes with the University of North Carolina at Chapel
Hill expanding its purpose of interest in the total state, along
with the flexibility to expand graduate and professional training
to one or more new additional campuses over the next decade,
is a concept which will make our educational leadership worthy
of comparison with the best in the world.
I trust that the partisans of each of these great institutions will
have the broad-mindedness to set us upon this course.
CONCLUSION
This Report of the Commission is perhaps the most thorough
study of education beyond the high school made by any state.
Along with the Southern Regional Education Board's "Goals
Report" we have pointed out for us the sound path of progress.
I hope we will use these studies and use them well. I hope the
copies in the hands of educators, legislators, trustees, will become
dog-eared with daily use.
Our mastering the complex potential for the development of
the human resources will determine how well our state moves
into the coming important years. This is the hope of the indi-
vidual. It is the hope of North Carolina. It is the hope of the
South. It was not without reason that Robert E. Lee, when he
put away his uniform, accepted an appointment to head a small
Virginia college. He recognized the need of the South then
to be what all of us see the need to be in our own day.
We need an increase in strength in our state, for the weak and
the wealthy, for farm and city people. Every one of us will
prosper, and our children and their children, if we make the
right decisions now. Our history has shown us what the right
decisions are.
We have this plan; we have the resources, and now is the time
Public Addresses and Summaries
301
to act together— to take the bold new steps which can give our
state its time of highest achievement, its finest hour.
DEDICATION OF NORTH CAROLINA
NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
Charlotte
November 26, 1962
Speaking at the dedication of the North Carolina National
Bank Building in Charlotte, the Governor said the bank was
built by people who saw the potential of North Carolina's great-
ness and who were willing to risk investments for future gain.
The story of the North Carolina National Bank and the story
of North Carolina were one and the same, in that both were
"built by boldness and faith." Some mistakes would be made,
but mistakes were better than not taking a chance on the future.
This philosophy had moved North Carolina from defeat and
despondency at the turn of the century to a new day of new
opportunities. The Governor summarized activities and achieve-
ments which showed the vitality of the state, but he said that not
all were sharing in the prosperity. Though North Carolina had
done much, much remained to be done. The state had to invest
in the future by providing for community colleges, more paved
roads, industrial technical training, educational TV, student
loans, better ports, and many other needs not met. Full concern
should be given to rehabilitating the needy, those in prison, the
disabled, the mentally ill, the retarded. "Let us continue to dare,
continue to strive, continue to move to make North Carolina
the most prosperous and the most wholesome state in the union."
COMMISSION ON SECONDARY SCHOOLS OF
SOUTHERN ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES
AND SCHOOLS
Dallas, Texas
November 28, 1962
[Governor Sanford, who was then serving as Chairman of the Southern
Regional Education Board, addressed the Commission on Secondary Schools
of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools meeting in Dallas,
Texas. He described the deficiencies of southern education in contrast to the
302
Papers of Terry Sanford
region's vast resources and urged members of the association to "make
sacrificial efforts to catch up and assume the lead." Warning against a
provincial approach to education, Sanford explained that southern education
had to prepare children to face competition from all areas of the nation and
the world.]
When I was a boy a group of us sometimes visited a farmer
who lived out near the Lumbee River. He had been everywhere,
it seemed to us, and he would tell us about his adventures. You
didn't see quite as many magazines then, and there wasn't any
such thing as television, so he was our eyes into the far corners
of the world. He had crossed the Mississippi River. He had been
all the way to the great hills of San Francisco. He had worked on
a fishing boat off the coast of Canada. He had been all the way
across the continent on a freight train, he said.
He had gone to school catch-as-catch-can, attending the type
of school existing in North Carolina back before your organization
was quite born. He knew a little about reading and writing, but
he could talk about the continent of America, and Canada, and
about Mexico, which he claimed to have seen, and Panama. We
boys absorbed all that he told us. On dusty summer afternoons
we sat on his porch listening.
One August day I recall one of the boys got to talking about
being tied down to Scotland County, said he believed he wouldn't
go back to school but would go on out to Seattle or even to
Canada to get a job on a fishing boat.
The old man crossed that porch, took that boy by the front
of his shirt, pulled him from the bannister to his feet and said
firmly, ''Listen here, don't you know you have to live in the
world you're born to!"
There are signs that we in the South at last are taking hold of
our own shirt fronts, shaking ourselves, and are saying to our-
selves as southerners: "Listen, don't you know you have to live
in the world you're born to?"
Lm not suggesting that we forsake the past, the good things of
the past, but we do need to free ourselves of the weakening
bondage which has held us down. The South, and the rest of
the nation for that matter, needs to take a long, hard look at
itself to see where it stands now, and to see where it hopes to
stand twenty years from now.
The material assets of the South are many. It is the only region
in the United States that fronts the sea on two sides. It has one-
third of all the good farm land in the nation. The South has
two-thirds of all the land in our country where the annual rain-
fall is more than forty inches, providing water in abundance for
industry, for crops, for transportation, and for recreation. The
Public Addresses and Summaries
303
South produces up to 65 per cent of the nation's petroleum, 48
per cent of the usable clay, 53 per cent of the coal, 76 per cent
of the natural gas, and 100 per cent of the bauxite and naturally
occurring sulphur.
In addition to these assets the South is industrializing rapidly,
and this fact constitutes one of our most dynamic potentials.
There is evidence of this all the way from the Piedmont Plateau
to the Gulf shores of Beaumont and Corpus Christi. Textile mills
dot the streams of the Piedmont Plateau; paper mills gulp short
leaf, loblolly, and other pines from Virginia to the Texas plains;
flame and smoke point out the steel mills at night; and regional
plants of big corporations spring up almost overnight.
Our public school system is southern, and we have no desire
to make it northern or anything other than southern. But that
does not require us to be provincial in our efforts to prepare our
children to take part in life. The sheer impact of the change
taking place in this modern-day America places our children in
competition with children from every section of the country.
The present day businessman cannot rely on competition
solely from his own county or even his own state. Products from
all over America, and indeed all over the world, flow in daily
to compete against the products he is selling. If he is a manu-
facturer, he can rest assured that a new industry from outside
the South will soon come in and he will have to meet the new
demands for labor and other resources.
If the child is setting out to become a lawyer, he can no longer
plan to make a living on criminal cases and a few actions in the
JP courts. He may be practicing in what we think of as a one-
horse town, but he still must match wits with bond attorneys
from Wall Street, tax attorneys trained by the federal government,
and corporation lawyers sent out by General Electric and Stand-
ard Oil.
In all professions and businesses the child from the South can
no longer think in terms of how good he might be in his own
community. He must be trained to compete on equal terms with
children schooled across the nation.
A friend told me once that he would rather live in the present
than in the past, but he sure did like the past better. I understand
that and I revel in the stories of the Old South, but whether the
old folk stories of a never-never land were entirely true or not
does not matter any longer.
My old man near the river lived in a world so different it's not
easy for us to reckon with it today. Take the element of time
itself. He farmed by spring, summer, fall. I don't remember his
ever mentioning the month of a year; rarely did he refer to a
304
Papers of Terry San ford
day. He had no specific concept of how long an hour was. He
would tell us to sit a spell. How long that was, nobody knew, and
nobody cared.
These were the ways of another time, leisurely times, and we
all like the memory of them. He liked them too, but at the same
time he sensed that we boys were in for a change, and maybe
he even knew that time and space were in for some changes too-
more than in any other generation in world history. He perhaps
was aware that the boys on his porch would come to know time
by hours and minutes and seconds and split-seconds; that for one
of them a fraction of a second would stand between him and
death in planes powered by thousand-horsepower motors. He
didn't know anything either about the speed of sound or how
far it was to the moon. For him, the moon was just over the
corn field. But he knew change was natural. And he sensed,
perhaps because of his travels, that the changes in the future
were not routinely mapped out, would not be repetitious, as
spring, summer, fall, winter, follows spring, summer, fall, winter.
And so to them some thirty or thirty-five years ago he said that
the training which had served him, which he had moved along
with, just as he moved along in companionable style with time
and space, would not serve them, and that they were the boys
of a new day.
Now, a generation later, we can see that our own children
are to be a part of a new day too, of still another new day. We
can't see its face, can't tell much about it from this distance, can
only judge that it will be far different from ours. We can know,
however, that our children must prepare themselves to be part
of the world, part of the dynamic new South, part of their own
new day.
I don't think we are doing a good job of this in the South. For
that matter I don't think the schools across America are doing
what they are capable of doing. I think we are beginning to see
what we must do; in some places we are getting a start, but we
are not quite fully under way.
We are far behind the rest of the country, generally speaking;
and while the distress and poverty of Reconstruction explains
this, now is no time for explanations. Because we are behind it
is required of us that we make sacrifical efforts to catch up and
assume the lead.
We need our own and a new kind of emancipation proclama-
tion which will set us free to grow and build, set us free from
the drag of poor people, poor schools, from hate, from dema-
goguery. It has to be a bold dream for the future, realistic in
terms of our whole country, and aware that the South is entering
Public Addresses and Summaries
305
upon the mainstream of American life. This kind of proclamation
can be written in one word: "education." It must be the kind of
education which seeks excellence, reaches all, looks to the future.
We simply have a difficult job to do, so let's get on with it.
About half of our students do not finish high school. Not half
enough of our able students go to college or technical schools.
We have too few teachers— not enough pay, not enough security,
not enough freedom, not enough standing. Our classes are gen-
erally too large. Our libraries are generally not large enough. Our
local governing bodies say too frequently that they don't have
the money. Our state legislatures frequently do not have the
money, and more frequently have not been given the information
they need if they are to see the urgency of school needs.
In most of our schools we don't offer a selection of studies wide
enough to cover the varied talents and skills the students have.
By not challenging our gifted students we lose their interest, they
lose their ambition, the region and nation lose their leadership
which we need more than ever. In having too few programs for
the very slow child, we deny happiness, leave too many un-
productive, and make more burdens for society.
In school administration, not all of our principals and superin-
tendents measure up to the professional standards we would set,
but this too is a reflection of public attitudes and money shortages.
Not nearly enough people have nearly enough understanding
of schools and the meaning education has for every part of our
lives and every hope of our nation, and therefore not nearly
enough citizens have the necessary commitment to building and
paying for public education.
These are our problems— some of them. What do we do?
Well, we can think about our own individual schools, do a
good job, and let it go at that. But you wouldn't be at this
meeting if you believed that way. The critical need today in
education for the South is for a universal belief in education,
what it can do for a people, its power and its importance. Even in
1962 we need obedience to Jefferson's command to "preach a
crusade against ignorance." And who can best preach this cru-
sade? Those who are at the top in the region. And who are they?
Members of the Southern Association. You must show the way.
Who knows better than you the drag of underdeveloped talent
manifested by youth who quit school before completion? Who
knows better than you the barrenness and dullness of the school
programs characterized by a lack of appeal, lack of imagination,
and lack of adequacy to meet the needs of 1962 youth? Who
knows better than you what happens when graduates of high
306
Papers of Terry San ford
school are not prepared for college, or jobs, or in all cases to fill
the obligations of citizenship?
Because you possess the knowledge, because you occupy the
position, because education in the southern region is crying for
leadership and direction, you have the responsibility for showing
the way.
Educational leadership involves more than executive detail.
It involves courage and concern, imagination and flexibility of
mind, tolerance and the ability to receive and turn criticism to
improvement.
If North Carolina has demonstrated nothing else, the events
of the past two years have demonstrated that the people will
support education, that they do understand the need, that they
do believe in preparing for the future of their boys and girls, and
that they will make the necessary sacrifices to support their
schools.
Too often the trouble is that the public, busy with its many
undertakings, doesn't know the shortages, is not aware of the
needs, and therefore fails to insist on appropriate school improve-
ment.
And too often the trouble is that the educators do not tell the
story, do not get the public's attention, do not let the people
know the needs of the schools. It is easy to understand that the
educator has his problems, his daily routines, his own doubts
about what his role in public appeal should be. Is it his duty
to tell the full story, to suggest that there are shortcomings? Is
it his duty to "sell" education? Is it his duty to ask for more than
he knows lies within the present range of the public revenues?
I think you can afford to tell the full story. I think you can
afford to say to your public that you are doing the best job you
can with what you have. I think your people would like to know
what you could do if you had more support. I think they would
like to have you picture for them just what kind of school system
your state, or county, or city could have. I think they should have
goals for better schools, and I think no one is better qualified
to define the goals than the professional educators.
True you cannot fight the battle alone. But you will not have
to because among those responding to your call will be legislators,
county commissioners, governors, and others in a position to take
decisive action.
The South has its problems, but the South has the answer.
Time and circumstances charge you with the duty of delivering
the answer to all the people.
We know enough about our section to know that the future
can be told in terms of the educational emphasis we establish in
Public Addresses and Summaries
807
our own day. We know that the social, economic, scientific, and
cultural progress o£ our people is dependent on education. We
know the future of commerce, industry, agriculture, society in
all its facets, and human happiness in most of its ways, are tied
to education.
We know that many of our people are doing something about
it and the South, this rich, great, storied, proud region is begin-
ning to stretch, to grow, to expand to lead, to serve.
SHAW UNIVERSITY \
Raleigh
December 3, 1962
North Carolina made more progress in the twentieth century
than any other state, starting from nothing and rising to leader-
ship and recognition, but the state had not gone far enough,
Governor Sanford said in an address at Shaw University. Because
of faith, pride, belief in fair play, confidence, and co-operative-
ness, the state had moved forward. North Carolina had had little
class or racial strife, had seen little of labor fighting management,
had experienced few episodes involving section against section.
Sanford said the program had only begun, and that schools and
colleges and universities offered opportunities for all. He pre-
dicted that the state could have the best schools anywhere within
ten years if groups continued to work together and did not
deal in prejudices and did not repeal the school tax program for
political reasons. He called on North Carolinians "to take the
time to understand, to have the courage to hold what we have,
to have the vision and faith to move forward in new boldness."
SOUTHERN ALBEMARLE CONVENTION
Plymouth
December 8, 1962
Storms in the eastern part of the state were a cause of concern,
and Sanford urged that that concern be carried further than
temporary alleviation of loss and suffering. He discussed the
impending danger of losing the coast line and showed the dis-
astrous consequences if steps were not taken to prevent destruc-
tion. With the region rapidly developing in the areas of tourist
attractions, new processing industries and better transportation
facilities, the value of maintaining the coast line was greater than
308
Papers of Terry Sanford
ever before. Plans to eliminate the threat were being developed
through efforts of the Department of Water Resources and other
state agencies and the federal government through its Corps
of Engineers. Conservation measures had been recommended for
certain areas. Sanford emphasized the urgency of the situation.
He commented that "Meetings and blueprints and good inten-
tions are not going to hold back the Atlantic Ocean." Though
the federal government would provide much of the money and
the state would provide additional funds, local sources would
have to furnish money. Sanford urged the people "to meet that
responsibility with the determination that is traditional with
eastern North Carolinians and with the enthusiasm that has
characterized your efforts to move forward in the past few years."
FACULTY CLUB OF THE
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL
Chapel Hill
January 8, 1963
The Governor began his remarks with references to his student
days at Chapel Hill and to his impressions and feelings concern-
ing the university. He said that the age of the university— young
in European terms— gave a sense of history because it was the
first university of the people. New buildings and new programs,
however, gave a feeling of the frontier. Though North Carolina
had a lengthy history, it was still a frontier state, with its
unexplored Coastal areas, its rapidly expanding Piedmont cities,
and its undeveloped Mountain region. The Governor pointed out
that North Carolina had more students in college than were
enrolled in the entire British Isles, a consequence of the outburst
of democratic feeling which followed the American Revolution
and led to the founding of a state university and a state-wide
system of public instruction. During succeeding generations
changes in physical surroundings and in attitudes had taken
place, and the university had instilled a sense of responsibility
in many who later became the state's leaders. Despite this fact,
20 to 25 per cent of the adults in North Carolina were illiterate,
and a democracy's survival depended on a literate citizenry.
Public schools required improvements in budgets, curriculum,
trained teachers, instruction. The Governor called upon "the
faculty of our most distinguished university" to train more
teachers and to study new methods of learning aids, to put more
emphasis on extension work, to help keep professional people
Public Addresses and Summaries
309
informed of changes in their fields, to expand the use of edu-
cational television, to help make possible a unified university
system. Sanford reaffirmed the policy of closer ties between the
state and the university. 'Just as our problems are immense, our
opportunities are great. Our people are ready to move ahead. We
will need your help every step of the way, your help as thinkers, as
teachers, as citizens." The Governor warned that the relationship
between the university and the state would likely change, because
in a frontier situation the relationship binding the two had not
been finally defined. Though "the university must insist on its
right to be free of political nagging and pressure, at the same
time it must be bound by loyalty to the life of a people." Sanford
expressed the belief that the university could be bound to a people
and at the same time participate fully in the world society of
scholars and learning, that a balance between the old concept
of universities and the need for the university to serve the people
could be achieved. The Governor ended by inviting the faculty
of "the first university of the people" to seek "solutions which
must be found for our people in the state and the South as we
move toward the twenty-first century."
BRIGHT LEAF TOBACCO STATES CONFERENCE
Raleigh
January 28, 1963
[Governor Sanford called this meeting in an effort to bring about re-
gional action to counteract the growing threats to the southern tobacco
industry. About 150 persons, representing the tobacco states of North Caro-
lina, South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, and Virginia, attended the Raleigh
meeting. Though the Governor's address touched on many facets of the
tobacco industry, the hope for a regional research laboratory subsidized by
federal funds was the closing suggestion.]
The flue-cured tobacco producing area of this great country
has been recognized for years throughout the entire world for
its superior flue-cured leaf. Two acres out of every five of our
flue-cured tobacco crop move into foreign markets, either in the
form of leaf tobacco or tobacco products. A decline in this
export market would not only reduce the incomes of individual
flue-cured tobacco producers but would also have an adverse
effect upon the entire economy, every businessman, every citizen
in the tobacco-producing states of Florida, Georgia, South Caro-
lina, North Carolina, and Virginia.
We welcome you to this meeting to discuss a means of determin-
ing the way to insure the production of a high quality flue-cured
310
Papers of Terry Sanford
tobacco which will be in demand by both foreign and domestic
users alike.
In working toward this goal, we must recognize that survival
of the tobacco industry demands that we not only develop desir-
able qualities in our leaf but that once these qualities are
attained, we must also maintain the proper management of them.
Until recently, our tobaccos have been universally recognized
as the "hallmark" of quality. As we have basked, complacently,
in the sunshine of past achievements of a high-quality product,
we have failed to capitalize on our leading position. During the
period 1950 to 1954, our flue-cured crop represented about 67
per cent of the free world's flue-cured tobacco output, but the
1962 crop represented only 52 per cent— a drop of around 15
per cent.
During this same period, major gains have taken place in
other flue-cured tobacco-producing countries such as Rhodesia-
Nyasaland, our biggest competitor in world trade, where the
1962 harvest was double its average for the years 1950 to 1954.
Substantial increases have also been recorded in Canada, India,
Japan, Brazil, Pakistan, the Philippines, and Australia.
World demand and purchases are growing, but actual exports
of flue-cured tobacco from the United States have not changed
significantly from the level recorded in the early 1950's. During
the same period, Rhodesia increased her exports by approximately
270 per cent. Exports from India and Canada have also risen
sharply since 1950.
This indicates trouble. It indicates that we have failed, and
failed miserably, to maintain our relative position in the world
export market. These developments are of major concern to us
and should sound a warning that the future for our flue-cured
tobacco is in jeopardy. Flue-cured tobacco interests are con-
fronted with an uncertain, hazard-laden future; yet if this prob-
lem is admitted and then met with determination, intelligence,
and collective action, we can move back into the market and
regain for the southeastern states the leading and increasing place
in supplying quality tobacco for both the foreign and domestic
markets.
No other country in the world has better soil, climate, and
know-how for producing highly competitive flue-cured tobacco.
The only catch is that we have not been taking full advantage
of all our potentials. Since we have neglected to capitalize on
these potentials, we now find ourselves confronted with the urgent
need to regroup, evaluate our present position, develop plans,
and take immediate steps toward regaining our proportionate
share of the world's flue-cured tobacco market.
Public Addresses and Summaries
311
Foreign and domestic purchasers have recently called our
attention to the quality deterioration in our flue-cured leaf. These
complaints have particularly mentioned the lack of aroma in our
leaf of recent years. Several important factors have been stressed
on numerous occasions, as contributing to the deterioration of
our flue-cured quality. Many of these complaints appear to be
related to, or associated with, the natural and strong incentive
in the past few years toward producing higher per-acre yields.
The factors often mentioned include the use of certain high-
yielding varieties which do not, under most farm conditions,
produce leaf of desirable flavor and aroma; the excessive use of
fertilizers; the production of an excessive number of leaves per
acre either through spacing too closely or too-high topping or a
combination of the two; excessive irrigation; harvesting immature
tobacco; and many other such factors.
I do not know how much merit there is to be found in any
of these complaints, but it is my firm conviction that this problem
will not be solved until we have an understanding and clear
definition of quality in tobacco.
People in the flue-cured tobacco-producing states of Florida,
South Carolina, Georgia, North Carolina, and Virginia can
share in the expanding world tobacco market if they improve
the quality of their flue-cured tobacco leaf and widen the gap
between the quality of their tobaccos and that of their com-
petitors. We, of the southeastern states, can be effective in pro-
moting our flue-cured leaf and insuring its future, both at home
and abroad, only if we make sure that it possesses those charac-
teristics for which consumer demand is greatest.
Our answer is research. Research provides a means through
which we can obtain a knowledge of the visual, physical, and
chemical factors that are indicative of quality in flue-cured
tobacco.
I solicit your assistance and co-operation in obtaining a regional
flue-cured tobacco quality research laboratory for seeking answers
regarding tobacco quality— its definition and how it can be
maintained and even enhanced in the future.
FIRST INSTITUTE FOR PAROLE BOARD MEMBERS
Chapel Hill
February 11, 1963
[In a news release in January, 1961, Governor Sanford noted that North
Carolina's rank of fifth in prison population "imposes a great responsibility
312
Papers of Terry Sanford
on the state of North Carolina and its people." As one means of meeting
the challenge, the National Parole Institutes planned a series of national
conferences; North Carolina held the initial meeting. The Governor's ad-
dress opened the week-long conference which was held at the Institute of
Government. The speech went beyond professional lines in an effort to
further community co-operation and understanding of the penal system.]
I understand that this is the first in a series of institutes for
parole board members to be held at different places across the
United States. North Carolina is proud of her growing list of
"firsts." I consider this one a highly significant addition. Adding
to its significance is the fact that this is the effective beginning of
two complementary programs.
The National Parole Institutes Program is administered by
the National Council on Crime and Delinquency. Sponsors
include the Association of Paroling Authorities, the United
States Board of Parole, and the Interstate Compact Administrators
Association of the Council of State Governments. Each succeed-
ing institute in the N. P. I. series may have a different theme,
but all will be designed to provide parole authority members
and administrators with the opportunity to meet as you are
meeting, to learn new concepts and techniques, and to review
experiences related to parole. The N.P.I, program is an out-
standing example of the short-term institutes receiving federal
support under the Juvenile Delinquency and Youth Offenses Con-
trol Act of 1961.
Support from the same source and under the same authority
has helped us to establish the Training Center on Delinquency
and Youth Crime at the University of North Carolina's Institute
of Government. This is one of a number of such centers so
established at universities throughout the country. These centers
provide a concentration of resources, knowledge, staff, and facili-
ties on a long-range basis for the training of all categories of
personnel who work with youth.
Thus, national and local endeavors are here joined for greater
strength and enduring benefits. This is a commendable example
of the co-ordination encouraged nationally by the President's
Committee on Juvenile Delinquency and Youth Crime and in
this state by a committee I have appointed to promote the same
purposes. By co-ordinating these two programs in this way, the
immediate and long-range impact of this particular institute is
greatly increased. I believe we are here engaged in an endeavor
of immense and lasting value.
The aim of the American system for the administration of
justice is the protection of the public by measures consonant with
our concepts of due process and individual dignity. This aim has
at least three elements.
Public Addresses and Summaries
313
The first is the swift, certain, and impartial imposition of
sanctions against individual lawbreakers. This requires sound
laws and effective agencies of apprehension and prosecution.
The second element is the provision of proper controls for
those who are unable to live a law-abiding life in a free com-
munity. Society has a right to expect protection against repeated
crime by convicted persons.
More than apprehension, imposition of sanctions, and pro-
vision for controls is required, however, if the administration
of justice is to be successful. Each year millions of offenders are
convicted in our criminal courts. The vast majority of these never
leave free society or are released after a relatively short confine-
ment. Therefore, the third element must be a concern with
developing self-control among those who break the law. Only
when this is done can we claim success for our efforts to prevent
repeated crime.
The experience of being apprehended and penalized is sufficient
to develop self-control in some violators. For another relatively
small group of offenders, neither penalities nor present knowl-
edge about human behavior seems sufficient. We must provide
for identifying and holding in safe custody for extended periods
these offenders whose early release would endanger free society.
The overwhelming mass of law violators are vocationally
unskilled, mentally or emotionally impaired, alcoholic, or simply
socially untrained. Penalties and custody alone are not going
to remove the root cause of their criminality. They require the
attention of skilled persons who can bring to bear on these
individual problems the scientific knowledge which we do have
about human behavior. They need help to develop the vocational
and social skills and the self-control required for law-abiding
life in free society.
General public support for sound measures to prevent and
control criminal and delinquent behavior is needed as never
before. Each year we see the number of law violators increasing
at a more rapid rate than our population is growing. Since the
eighteen to twenty-five years old age group contributes heavily to
our crime burden, we are faced with the high probability of a
further rise in the crime rates as the youngsters born during the
postwar "baby boom" reach this age of difficult adjustments.
We seem to be spinning in an inflationary spiral of institutional
failure. Home and community inadequacies contribute to the
development of juvenile delinquency. Too many delinquents
pass uncorrected through the juvenile courts and correctional
agencies into the courts and correctional services for adult
offenders and out again with their criminality confirmed.
314
Papers of Terry Sanford
Clearly the confirmed criminal is the least hopeful prospect
for shaping into a self-respecting and responsible citizen, willing
and able to contribute constructively to the progressive develop-
ment of a free society. We must not abandon all hope and cease
our efforts to develop self-control and proper attitudes and aims
among even the most hardened maximum-custody prisoners.
But we should place the greatest stress upon programs designed
to stop the growth of criminality as close to the seed stage as
we can get.
The seeds for crime are large in number and varied in form.
The vexing complexities of crime causation call for complete
mobilization, proper co-ordination, and full utilization of many
resources to meet the ominous threat to the stability of our social
order posed by the accelerating growth of this agelong social
problem.
Effective to cope with this challenge, public and private local
resources, as well as state and federal programs, must be mobilized
to move vigorously and imaginatively on a wide front. Even if
all agencies directly connected with our system of criminal justice
work harmoniously together, the system will fail to accomplish
its mission if forced to operate in a hostile and inadequate
society.
Therefore, when you consider your responsibilities as parole
board members, you should not limit your concern to passing
upon the cases officially before you. Your responsibilities as high
office holders in a constitutional democracy include the exercise
of leadership in the struggle of the people toward the realization
of their full potential for a productive, healthy, and free society
of self-respecting and responsible citizens.
The need for bold and imaginative leadership was never
greater. Improvements must be made in our correctional methods,
and the general public must be brought to understand and sup-
port constructive changes. You have a special responsibility to
explain the nature and need for parole, and correctional inno-
vations related to parole. But in your role as a citizen leader, you
also have a responsibility to promote full mobilization and
effective co-ordination of all resources for the prevention and
control of crime and delinquency.
The public schools may well be the place where we can first
discover and correct the criminal tendencies before their mani-
festation multiplies the problems of correction. The behavioral
scientists are beginning to push back the frontiers of ignorance
about the mental and emotional makeup of man. There is basis
for belief that criminal characteristics can be detected in the
formative stages when habit patterns are easier to alter.
Public Addresses and Summaries
315
I am not claiming that it is possible for us to eliminate the
criminal element from our population by improving our public
schools. I am not suggesting that we have reached the point where
we can single out for correctional treatment every incipient
criminal while still a school child. I am not asserting that we can
correct every child believed to be headed toward a life of crime.
What I am saying is that we must make fuller use of advancing
knowledge for these purposes. By developing and using the
full potential of our educational resources, I am confident that
we can appreciably reduce the incidence of delinquency and
crime.
One consequence of our failure to provide adequate schools is
revealed by the appalling rate of unemployment among out-of-
school youth between sixteen and twenty years of age. This rate
is more than double the rate for all age groups.
School inadequacies are at least partly to blame for the grow-
ing number of school dropouts. Youngsters with inadequate
schooling have great difficulty securing and retaining satisfactory
employment. Unemployed and dissatisfied young people are much
more likely to become delinquents or youthful offenders than
are young people with worthwhile jobs. Stating the obvious serves
to point up the importance of doing all that we can to provide our
youth with the education and training they will need to find satis-
fying employment in the labor market of today and tomorrow.
Here in North Carolina we are developing a very good vo-
cational training program in the industrial education centers
located throughout the state. I am confident this program could
meet the training needs of many young people who are not par-
ticipating because they are not aware or not appreciative of the
training available to them at these centers.
I have recently established the North Carolina Good Neighbor
Council whose mission is to urge youth to become better trained
and qualified for employment and to encourage the employment
of qualified people without regard to race. I have asked all mayors
and chairmen of boards of county commissioners to establish
local Good Neighbor Councils. While the Good Neighbor pro-
gram is not primarily directed toward the prevention of crime
and delinquency, this will be an important consequence of its
success.
Unfortunately, we are not going to be completely successful in
our efforts to prevent crime and delinquency. I accept the
regrettable probability that we shall continue to be confronted
with a large number of young people whose misbehavior will
extend beyond the coiTectional capabilities of family, church, and
school. But I believe we can provide better services to help them
316
Papers of Terry Sanford
find their way back to the path of rectitude as soon as possible
after their first departure from it.
Several years ago I served as chairman of a commission ap-
pointed by Governor William B. Umstead to study the juvenile
courts and correctional institutions of North Carolina. Through-
out our study we adhered wholeheartedly to the concept that the
proper function of a juvenile court and correctional system
should be to correct unbalanced behavior patterns through guid-
ance and training rather than to serve as a tribunal and instrument
of punishment. That concept still guides my thinking in this
area.
We must broaden and strengthen our programs for prevention,
our juvenile and criminal court services, and our systems of com-
munity treatment, such as probation. But for the foreseeable
future, we will be forced to deal with a number of offenders who
will need to be removed from the community for a time. We
must never cease our search for ways to keep this number as
small and the time as short as we can without unjustifiable risk
to the public. Major dependence must be placed upon you mem-
bers of full-time parole boards to provide the requisite leadership.
Today there are more than 200,000 persons confined in penal
institutions for adult felons in the United States. Each year more
than 100,000 are admitted to these institutions. Over 95 per
cent of these will eventually be released into our communities,
probably half in t^vo or three years.
If their prison experience has taught them respect for law, has
increased their chances for successfully competing in our eco-
nomic system, has given them a more healthy attitude toward
themselves, and has instilled a sense of responsibility toward
others, then we can feel that they have benefited from time in
prison. The real test comes in the free community. Parole is a
service that provides essential assistance at the time of crucial
need.
Unfortunately, parole has too often been confused with the
sentimental approach toward the offender. There is a com-
pelling logic for a wisely operated parole program as part of a
system of justice which seeks to protect the public while maxi-
mizing concern for individual dignity. This is not sentimentality.
Parole is a sensible way of retaining needed controls and pro-
viding rehabilitative assistance to persons released from prison
during the period required for them to complete the difficult
change from inmate to parolee to citizen. But there continues
to exist major misunderstanding of its purpose, great variations
in its use, and serious shortages of adequately trained personnel.
National prison statistics show that only 60 per cent of those
Public Addresses and Summaries
317
released each year in the United States are released on parole.
The other 40 per cent are turned loose with no controls or assist-
ance. Variance in use of parole is very great. The five states using
it most release over 90 per cent of their prisoners under parole
supervision while the five using it least release only 25 per cent
by parole.
Failure to exploit fully the potential of parole reflects a need
for better public understanding of the vital role played by
parole in the community's security and welfare. Public support
is essential if parolees are to have a fair chance to succeed. A
parolee denied a reasonable opportunity for a decent job and
the self-respect that goes with it is highly likely to return to
crime as the only life open to him. Public attention should be
called to the fact that tens of thousands of parolees are living
in the free community and making an acceptable adjustment. We
should not permit the glare of publicity to be focused only on the
relatively small percentage who fail.
The inmate population of the North Carolina prison system
started to climb at the close of World War II. From less than
6,000 in 1945, the number grew at an alarming rate, passing
12,000 early in 1961, the year I became Governor. By a co-
ordinated attack along the lines I have been advocating in this
speech, we have succeeded in stopping the growth of our prison
population. The Prison Department's budget requests for the
next biennium are based on an inmate population estimate which
represents a reduction of more than a thousand inmates from
what the figure would have been if the average inmate population
had continued to grow as it did from 1945 through 1961.
I do not discount the importance of tax dollar savings when I
affirm that the savings in human resources and the reduction in
heartbreak and mental anguish are the most significant gains
realized by stopping the growth of our prison population.
Increased use of probation and parole for appropriate cases
contributed significantly to the reduction of the prison popu-
lation. Considerable credit is also due to prison rehabilitation
programs. Perhaps the most significant single factor explaining
the greater success of these programs is closer involvement of the
free community.
Close co-operation between the Prison Department and free
community agencies and citizens in aiding alcoholics has helped
to remove many from the list of repeated offenders. Not so readily
measurable but clearly considerable are the immediate and long-
range benefits of the mental health clinic at Central Prison, which
was established and is operated co-operatively by the Prison
Department and the Hospitals Board of Control.
318
Papers of Terry Sanford
The rapid growth and remarkable success of our work release
program has attracted national and international attention. Since
the original enactment in 1957 of the Work Release Law, each
session of the North Carolina General Assembly has produced
modification broadening the law's application. Basic provisions
have remained unchanged. These authorize the Prison Depart-
ment to grant certain inmates of the State Prison System the
privilege of working at regular employment in the free com-
munity and spending only their leisure time in confinement.
Inmates granted these privileges surrender their earnings to the
Prison Department. After deducting the cost of the inmate's
keep, the Prison Department arranges for paying through the
appropriate county department of public welfare such part of the
balance of the inmate's earnings as is needed to support his
dependents. The remainder is kept in trust and paid to him
when he is paroled or discharged from prison.
Possession of money and productive employment on final
release from prison are two positive factors contributing impor-
tantly to the low rate of recidivism for inmates granted work
release privileges. Less tangible but probably even more impor-
tant are the increased self-respect and self-confidence frequently
found in those inmates who serve all or the final part of their
prison sentences on work release.
Although the growth of the prison population has been halted,
it will begin again unless we continue to develop alternatives to
imprisonment for appropriate cases and unless we expand and
improve programs for reducing the number of prisoners who
return to crime after their release. We need more probation
officers better to serve the courts so that judges can keep out
of our prisons those offenders whose rehabilitation can be effected
under supervision in the free community. We need more parole
supervisors so that the public may be better protected by timely
release of prisoners under supervision. We need to have the
Work Release Law modified so that its proven value as a pre-
parole program can be extended to prisoners serving sentences
longer than five years. We need to expand and extend the pro-
grams and measures conducted co-operatively by the Prison De-
partment and the Hospitals Board of Control to determine what
can and should be done for prisoners who are mentally ill or
inebriates. We need to make a comprehensive study of alterna-
tives for treating the alcoholic offender. We need to provide our
courts with diagnostic services to aid them when they are uncer-
tain as to appropriate disposition of an offender, and with
facilities to which they may send convicted offenders who should
not be in prison but who cannot profit from probation until they
Public Addresses and Summaries
319
have been given special preparation. We need to encourage and
facilitate co-ordination of the programs of all agencies concerned
with crime prevention and control.
Since Mr. Johnson Matthews, Chairman of our Board of
Paroles, and Lee Bounds, Director of the Training Center on
Delinquency and Youth Crime,^^^ will be with you all of this
week, I can depend upon them to provide you with more details
about our programs and our plans.
I shall also depend upon them to gather for us the fruits of your
deliberations at this institute. We need to help each other by
free and full exchange of information, ideas, and experience.
None of us can afford the luxury of complacent isolation. I am
confident none of us desires it. I believe you all share my feelings
about the importance of what you are doing this week. Thank
you for the privilege of participating in this pioneering program.
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION
OF SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS
Atlantic City^ New Jersey
February 19, 1963
Speaking in New Jersey to a group of school administrators
from all over the United States, Governor Sanford told his
audience that he had visited schools in 66 of North Carolina's
100 counties during the preceding year and a half. He said he
had tried to impress upon the students the importance of educa-
tion, but that he himself was impressed with all that was not
being done. "In a government by, of, and for the people, public
education is supported by political action," the Governor de-
clared, and he called on those in the fields of politics and edu-
cation to lead. Politicians had too often failed to provide funds,
and educational leaders had failed to provide the desire in stu-
dents to read and to develop their ability to think. Education,
the Governor said, was fundamental to military defense, to in-
creasing economic skills, to health and strength. For children
from homes which were "culturally dispossessed," schools were
an impossible challenge; these students dropped out only to
accept menial jobs and to live in slums. Illustrating his talk
with the "North Carolina Story," the Governor said that the
lesson learned in his state was that people would support school
improvement if the issue was put to them squarely. The North
Vernon Leland Bounds, Assistant Director at the Institute of Government at
Chapel Hill. University Record, 1962-1963, 300.
320
Papers of Terry Sanford
Carolina General Assembly appropriated funds to put into effect
a program of quality education, thus making education the
"first order of business." Immediately morale improved among
school personnel, and all worked harder to justify the confidence
placed in them. The state of North Carolina, with over a million
students, provided 80 per cent of the support for the schools. The
Governor told his audience of special classes for gifted students,
of summer training programs for talented boys and girls, and of
other specialized programs. He said some areas were not so
fortunate as others, that ideas were strangers in those places, and
that ways had to be worked out for helping this culturally
deprived group. "Too long we have put most of our best teachers
in the classrooms of the privileged children. . . . How in the
world can we continue the present system of favoritism and not
eventually split our society down the middle," the Governor
asked. After quoting the credo on the Statue of Liberty, Sanford
described America's disadvantaged segments of society as "our
tired, our poor, our huddled masses yearning to breathe free."
The golden door for this group of people was education, declared
Governor Sanford, and "Special, understanding education is the
lamp that will light their way." The schools had the responsibility
of lighting the lamp, and the school administrators had to hold
it high.
"NORTH CAROLINA DAY"
AT SALES EXECUTIVES CLUB OF NEW YORK
New York^ New York
February 26, 1963
[Governor Sanford's trip to New York to "sell North Carolina industry"
was reminiscent of his week-long trip in 1961 to the Ohio Valley. In attend-
ance at this luncheon meeting were 800 Tar Heels accompanying the Gov-
ernor, approximately 500 members of the Sales Executives Club, and 150
North Carolinians living and working in metropolitan New York. Color
slides of North Carolina industry were shown and more than 5,000 "Made
in North Caaolina" products were distributed to members of the club and
guests. Sanford ended his talk with a proclamation of faith in the people
of North Carolina and the value of the state's educational program.]
Your organization is of people in the business of selling, which
is at the heart of the free enterprise system, and your club is
designed to promote and to gain new knowledge about this funda-
mental process of commerce.
At first glance there may not be much similarity in your under-
takings and the methods of "selling a state."
Public Addresses and Summaries
321
In the first place why sell a state? Why is it necessary? What is
all of this business about salesmanship and state government? Are
those of us in government getting too far afield when we think
about selling?
The Raleigh News and Observer had this to say in an editorial:
"What then is our duty? It is to go to work earnestly to build
up North Carolina. . . . And what nobler employment could
enlist the energies of a people than the developing of the great
resources . . .?"
It so happens, this was written November 9, 1880. And indeed
the energies were turned to developing the resources. It wasn't
easy. The devastation of the war, little capital, the best of the
youth killed or maimed, and sorry government made survival,
much less advancement, difficult.
By the turn of the century, the size of the textile industry had
increased by ten times and was to lead the nation by the 1940's.
In 1865 Washington Duke^^^ was manufacturing tobacco on
his farm, and his son Buck^^^ was peddling it from a wagon. In
1890 the American Tobacco Company, combining and absorbing
numerous other companies, dominated the industry. The division
of this company in 1911 left North Carolina in a leading position
which has been enhanced to the present day.
In 1881 a plant was organized to manufacture spindles for
the cotton mills, and it later evolved into a furniture factory, but
not until several other furniture factories were built. From this
beginning, North Carolina has become the largest manufacturer
of wood furniture.
So it was tobacco, textiles, furniture products manufactured
from products of the soil, the best that could be done.
There were many other related businesses springing up, and
individual initiative here and there set up more sophisticated
industries, but the giants of the economy remained farming, tex-
tiles, tobacco, and furniture.
The depression of the 1930's made everybody aware of the
dangers of an economy no more diversified than ours; and the war
years brought much diversification, with national companies, the
Washington Duke (1820-1905), farmer, Confederate soldier from Orange
County; entrepreneur of early tobacco industry; wealthy North Carolina philan-
thropist. Ashe, Biographical History, III, 84-93.
James Buchanan Duke (1856-1925), son of Washington Duke, tobacco manu-
facturer and capitalist leader in power development; organizer and President of
American Tobacco Company, 1889-1912; Chairman, Board of Directors, British-
American Tobacco Company, 1912-1925. Ashe, Biographical History, III, 102-113;
Who Was Who in America: A Companion Biographical Reference Work to Who's
Who in America (Chicago: A. N. Marquis Company, 1960) , I, 344, hereinafter
cited as Who Was Who in America.
322
Papers of Terry San ford
electronics business, and the chemicals industry reaching into
North Carolina for locations and markets.
Here then, at the end of World War II, with the lifting of re-
strictions, with greater wealth, with ambitious returning veterans,
with wider purchasing power, was the opportunity North Caro-
lina had been waiting for, the need for diversification, the call
of 1880 "for developing the great resources."
Some of the growth could come from home industries, and
much has. But across the nation was a trend for industry to
spread out to other areas.
Here was the need to let the message get to those who were
looking for new markets, new places, and new profits. Here was
the call to tell business and industry about a new and growing
land, holding profits and promise for those who would come and
invest and expand.
Here was the call for salesmanship. Here was the need and
demand for salesmanship. We had the soil and the land. But there
is much land. We had the warm and healthful climate, but so
did many other states. We had people, but doesn't everybody? We
had water, but this wasn't exclusive. How could we be different,
and how could we be better?
First of all, we decided that our main interest had to be
people. We did not want smokestacks just for the sake of statistics.
We wanted jobs for people so that they might provide more for
their families and find more fulfillment in life. We decided we
should not be too materialistic but should seek development in
all fields. This was a fortunate choice because today industry
offers more and wants more for its people. We wanted to make
ours the kind of state in which people and industries could grow
and prosper.
The great demand today is for management leadership. Cheap
labor is not a drawing card for most industry. We say frankly if
you are looking for cheap labor, don't look at us. We can promise
you honest, hard-working labor. We can find you people who
can learn quickly the new skills you require. We have an out-
pouring every year of men and women capable of leadership in
management.
Leadership ability and industrial skills are the business of
the state because education is the business of the state, and it is
through education that we develop the managerial ability and
the skilled labor which will develop and attract the kind of new
industry we seek.
How do you sell a state? Well, first of all, you look to your
duty.
Public Addresses and Summaries
323
The State University located at Raleigh and at Chapel Hill
joined with Duke University, and these three outstanding insti-
tutions, with the state government and leaders of private business,
created the famous North Carolina Research Triangle, the Re-
search Triangle Institute, and gave new emphasis to science to
get ready for an age of science in industry.
Faculty salaries were increased and enrichment funds were
provided for the other fifteen tax-supported colleges, while the
forty-two private colleges in the state were improving their
facilities and faculties.
Education was to be the key to our hopes.
We established twenty industrial education centers across the
state with education beyond the high school available in an almost
unlimited array of subjects, with flexibility to reach out to every
town and county, and enrolling more than 26,000 students last
year, the third year since the first was built.
Education in skills was to back up our education for science
and management.
Plans are now before our legislature for the development of a
system of comprehensive community colleges which will make
education available to thousands of additional students each
year, and educated leaders available each year to our expanding
economy.
We have embarked upon the most ambitious program of public
school improvement in the history of the state. At the last session
of the General Assembly we provided new funds which rated
North Carolina as the state making the greatest leap forward.
Just last week, the chairman of the State Board of Education
appeared before the legislature to say that he had no additional
requests; that for the first time in the history of the state all of
the school requests were contained in the recommended budget.
Education up and down the line, from the first grade through
the graduate school, is the trademark of the product we are sell-
ing.
We built state port facilities for the first time at the natural
and long used but mostly undeveloped ports of Wilmington and
Morehead City. Now we cannot build fast enough to keep ahead
of the business.
We paved more roads and highways than any other state in
the union. This too, was getting ready for business, an investment
in better living, the greatest system of rural roads in America
supporting a labor force not crowded into cities but coming
to work on all-weather roads the year round, providing a system
of primary and interstate highways capable of supporting the
324
Papers of Terry Sanford
North Carolina trucking industry, which is the largest in the
nation.
This kind of homework was essential to support our selling.
There are examples of many other things, many other improved
programs to make North Carolina more attractive.
We have the only state-supported art museum. It is a very good
one. Is this important to new industry? I think so.
We have a state-supported symphony orchestra, and several
creditable city orchestras. We have the three outstanding out-
door dramas: at Cherokee in the Indian country, at Boone in
Daniel's country, and at Manteo, The Lost Colony, where Eng-
lishmen first set foot in the New World.
We have the unique Outer Banks and the seashore, the high-
est mountains east of the Rockies, the Sandhills with the greatest
concentration of golf courses.
You can take a vacation right in your home state, a different
kind every summer, and, in fact, the tourist business is our third
largest business; and we call North Carolina the "Variety Va-
cationland."
As a matter of fact, you can work all day and fifteen minutes
after quitting time you can be sitting in your garden or if you
are more ambitious, you can be tending the tomato plants.
We expanded our parks, cleaned up our streams and rivers,
developed our forests and woodlands, promoted our fishing and
hunting, strengthened our community planning so that we might
avoid slums, spread out our recreational programs. As you know,
we gave the country Miss America in 1962.
I have talked about what we have done since the end of World
War II. I do not mean the Governor. I do not mean just the past
governors. I do not mean the state government. The great
progress North Carolina has made, the success of our efforts to
get new industry, to expand old industry, to build better schools,
roads, to make a better state, to provide new opportunities for
our people, has been due to people.
The promise to industry is people— people productive, capable
of intelligent leadership, wholesome, determined, building, grow-
ing, taking advantage of their opportunities to build a stronger
America and a better life. This is really what we are selling.
There isn't anything else which will attract and sustain industry
and business.
The business of North Carolina is people, and the attraction
of North Carolina is people.
I promised I would bring you some samples from North
Carolina, so I have here today samples of North Carolina's
Maria Beale Fletcher, from Asheville, was chosen Miss America in 1962.
Public Addresses and Summaries
325
success— its people. Representing almost 5 million people, here
are 800 of North Carolina's finest product.
We have trained people from our State Department of Conser-
vation and Development roaming the nation, talking to businesses
looking for expansion opportunities in the Southeast. They can
talk engineering, rail and transportation rates, water supply,
labor potential, markets, and anything else of interest to the
businessman.
Almost every community in the state has a group, mostly
unpaid, ready to show the resources to those who seek expanded
opportunities. We have had missions to New York, to Chicago,
to Philadelphia, to Europe, to the Ohio Valley, with 50 to 100
North Carolinians going at their own expense, to talk with busi-
ness leaders about the advantages of North Carolina.
Admittedly, sometimes this is misunderstood. On my trip with
fifty North Carolinians through five cities of the Ohio Valley,
a newspaper referred to our group as "Terry and the Pirates."
But here is what we told them: "In the last decade, more than |1.5
billion was invested in new and expanded industrial plants in
North Carolina.
"In the first quarter of this year, our state broke all of its
records in erecting new industry— more than $42 million worth.
"During the recession of 1960, North Carolina's economy
expanded. A recent United States Department of Commerce
report pointed out that business in North Carolina generally held
firm during 1960 despite reported recessive downtrends in the
nation.
"The truth of the matter is that during the recession year of
1960, North Carolina was compiling a new record of industrial
growth.
"We intend to accelerate that industrial drive.
"That is why we are here.
"There is profit in North Carolina for new industry. North
Carolina is the leading industrial state of the fastest growing new
market in America, the Southeast.
"We have not come here to engage in plant piracy. We are here
to encourage industrial expansion. We haven't come to steal,
we've come to sell— to sell North Carolina as a profitable site for
expanding industries."
After the trip, the Indianapolis Times wrote an editorial en-
titled "Let's Follow Suit." The Journal Herald of Dayton called
the visit "nothing short of inspiring." The Dayton Daily News
wrote that North Carolina "knows that modern industries look
326
Papers of Terry Sanford
for a community that can attract and hold executives, engineers,
and technicians. Industries now ask about schools, colleges, tech-
nical institutes— even about libraries, art galleries, symphony
orchestras." The Columbus Evening Dispatch entitled its edi-
torial "North Carolina Sets Example."
The missions are occasional, but the roving ambassadors are
constant, going to every part of the nation, telling the story,
furnishing information, consulting about the possibilities. Has
this kind of salesmanship been effective? We are sure that it
has.
Last year the economy of North Carolina reached an all-time
high.
We once were called, by one of our native historians, "The
Rip Van Winkle State." More recently, the National Geographic
called North Carolina "The Dixie Dynamo."
We also like to talk about North Carolina's government, be-
cause this is one of the truest indicators of the quality of the
product we are selling. We have a surplus. We have a balanced
budget. We rank in the bottom five of the fifty states in taxes,
debt, government employees, state and local combined, per capita.
Our credit is the best given any state— AAA. We have been in
North Carolina neither radical nor reactionary.
Since the year of 1900, there has not been so much as a breath
of scandal in North Carolina's state government. Without any
self-praise, I can report honestly that our people deserve the
well-known native slogan, "Good Government Is a Habit in
North Carolina."
If you go out to sell a washing machine, you can develop one
of two approaches. If you must, you can sell it for a dollar down,
easy payments, and because it is cheap. That is what you have
to rely on if your product doesn't have character. I am sure that
you would rather sell on the basis of your product's name,
its reputation, its soundness, and the character of your company.
We don't offer any cheap way. We don't offer tax concessions.
We don't believe this is fair to the existing taxpayers, and we
don't believe a company willing to avoid fair taxes will make
a very good citizen anyhow.
We offer all we have: our climate, our water resources, our
transportation, our schools, our natural beauty, our conscientious
people.
We are trying to improve all of these things. That is our first
order of salesmanship.
We do not hesitate to put out the challenge made famous in
salesmanship, "Ask the man who owns one." Our business leaders,
our industrialists are our best salesmen, by their testimony, as you
Public Addresses and Summaries
327
will learn today at your individual tables, but more important
by their example. They add much to the character of our product.
What North Carolina has to sell is what America has to sell,
the hope of free men around the globe— a great productive
capacity manned by a creative, enterprising, and freedom-loving
people.
Essentially, we are selling character— character of our people
as expressed in their lives, their work, their industries, their
government.
We hope to keep this ingredient in our product always.
That is the best way to sell a state.
INTRODUCTION OF
VICE-PRESIDENT LYNDON B. JOHNSON
Raleigh
March 30, 1963
In introducing Lyndon B. Johnson to those attending the
Jefferson-Jackson Day Dinner, Governor Sanford said that North
Carolina continued to progress through the Democratic party. He
called Johnson a man who stood for progress, growth, and new
opportunity, a man who played important roles in the Roose-
velt, Truman, and Kennedy administrations, and a man who had
served in politics for years. Faced with world peace and space
problems, the nation could look to its "capable, able, productive
Vice-President" for sturdy leadership. He welcomed Johnson
to North Carolina, predicting "I am sure that in 1968 it will be
Lyndon B. Johnson."
DEDICATION OF
SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH BUILDING
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA
Chapel Hill V .^
April 7, 1963
At the ceremonies of dedication of a new public health building
in Chapel Hill, the Governor commented on the presence of out-
of-state guests as testimony to the significance of the occasion. He
spoke of the development of public health in North Carolina
328
Papers of Terry Sanford
and of the leadership in the field throughout the years. The
School of Public Health, with its outstanding department of
environmental health sciences, was cited as a reason for the
establishment of the national center for environmental health in
the Research Triangle area. Sanford said North Carolina's dedi-
cation to professional education was matched by its concern for
the health of the citizens. He called the building "a monument
to our determination to insure that the world will be a better
place in which to live tomorrow."
FIRST NATIONAL CONFERENCE
NATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR SUPPORT OF THE
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Washington, D. C.
April 8, 1963
Speaking in Washington, the Governor urged the adoption of
education as a mission for the nation. He said that for 375 years
since the birth of Virginia Dare all Americans had sought a
chance for the individual; this goal meant that every child should
have the opportunity to get the most out of life and to give the
most back. Such opportunity could not be achieved except by
action of the state because the needs were too broad and too
diverse for central solution by the federal government. Edu-
cation was essential if goals were to be met. "The fundamentals
of self-fulfillment, responsibility of citizenship, success of de-
mocracy itself depend on the quality and scope of our education."
Scientific advances, cultural progress, farm practices all depended
on education. Stability of government was the result of education;
education itself in the future was dependent on education of the
present. Sanford called for attention to the individual and to his
chance in life. North Carolina's goal was worth the effort, and
the General Assembly was working to accomplish that goal; the
Governor observed that citizens would support advances if the
question was put to them fairly and directly. He urged the nation
to adopt the North Carolina mission, which was education.
Public Addresses and Summaries
329
CHICAGO APPRECIATION LUNCHEON OF
CHARLOTTE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Chicago, Illinois
April 17, 1963
Governor Sanford, after describing links between North Caro-
lina and Chicago, pointed out the fact that trade was a two-way
street. Major business interests of Chicago had discovered that
the road from North Carolina led to Chicago; the same road led
from Illinois to North Carolina. Representatives of numerous
companies had plants or offices in Charlotte because Charlotte
and North Carolina had much to offer national companies; the
Governor invited business people to attend the Trade Fair.
Though North Carolina and Charlotte were late entering the era
of industrial development, the state did not intend to be late
in the atomic and space age. The South was the fastest-growing
region in the United States; North Carolina was the fastest-grow-
ing state in education, industry, highways, and farming in the
South; Piedmont North Carolina was the fastest-growing section
of the state and Charlotte one of its most rapidly expanding
centers. Sanford proceeded to cite the financial and commercial
assets of Charlotte but concluded that the people were the great-
est asset. He ended with an invitation to the citizens of Chicago
to visit North Carolina for business and for pleasure.
ANNUAL SIXTH DISTRICT MEETING
OMEGA PSI PHI FRATERNITY, A & T COLLEGE
Greensboro
April 27, 1963
[Governor Sanford's administration was noted for leadership in race rela-
tions during a period of unrest and actual violence in parts of the country.
His positive stand was reflected over and over again. The establishment of
the Good Neighbor Council was announced on January 18, 1963 (see state-
ment on page 579); the Governor's handling of situations arising from
student demonstrations during the spring resulted in favorable comment
throughout the nation. In this address to students at A & T College, Sanford
called on Negroes to meet their responsibilities to match their privileges.]
I am deeply honored by the recognition you have given me
this afternoon. I would prefer to think that the honor is less a
Hi
330
Papers of Terry Sanford
personal one than an endorsement of the position I have taken
regarding the future of this state and all its people.
If this be the case, and I sincerely hope that it is, then I am
happy that I can share this recognition with growing numbers
of North Carolinians.
Simply stated, this position is nothing more and nothing less
than an effort to meet the responsibilities of my office by reacting
honestly and realistically to the challenge facing North Carolina
at this critical moment in its history.
Facts cannot be denied, and in North Carolina today they
can be stated simply. We must move forward as one people or we
will not move forward at all. We cannot move forward as whites
or Negroes or merchants or farmers or candlestick makers. We
can only move forward as North Carolinians.
Another fact, simply stated, is that North Carolina has a
fantastic potential. Much of this potential is obvious, and it is
entirely probable that much of it has not become apparent to us
yet. In any event, it cannot be argued that we have all the
resources needed to give our people a standard of living that will
be envied across the nation.
The most obvious fact, however, is that this prosperity will not
just happen. It must be made to happen. And the only way we
can make it happen is by developing and using to maximum
advantage the knowledge and skills of all our citizens.
The answer doesn't lie in just finding jobs for all our people
who can work and want to work. This is only a beginning. We
have to look far beyond this point. Our goal— and the goal to
which we must dedicate ourselves today— is to create in North
Carolina the kind of business atmosphere that will give us the
prosperity we seek, and more importantly, equip our own people
to contribute to and derive maximum benefit from this new and
dynamic society.
Both of these things must be accomplished at the same time.
If we develop the skills of our people without developing the
kind of economy that rewards those skills, we will have achieved
nothing. Our young, productive citizens will leave us, as more
than 300,000 of them did in the last decade and as an equal
number are likely to do in the present decade.
On the other hand, if we struggle with the mechanics of
economic growth— with making our cities more attractive, with
building industrial plants, with making investment capital avail-
able, with developing our water resources— without training our
people to be a vital part of this growth, then we have again
defeated our own purpose.
The point is that we must have balance. We must develop the
Public Addresses and Summaries
331
opportunities and, at the same time, make sure that our people
have the skills to take full advantage of those opportunities. tVe
have not had this balance in the past. We do not have it now.
But, and this is the important thing, we are much nearer acquir-
ing that balance than we have ever been before. We are nearer
because more of our people understand its importance and
because more of them are working to make it a reality.
We will not reach this goal overnight. It is a long-range oper-
ation—long-range because the key is education. And, as all of you
here know, there is no such thing as instant education. There is
no magic wand that we can wave over the uneducated and
unskilled men or women to equip them for productive roles in
this fast paced and highly competitive society.
Unfortunately, there are a lot of these people in North Caro-
lina. They are largely responsible for the fact that in 1962 our
state dropped from forty-second to forty-fourth among the fifty
states in per capita income. Actually, our per capita income rose
4 per cent, keeping pace with the national average. But this was
not enough. Other states did better. This is the thing we are try-
ing to do something about, and it is a thing we are going to do
something about.
We are tackling the problem in two ways. In the first place,
we are by no means writing off as losses those unskilled and poorly
educated people who have passed what we normally consider the
school age. We want these people to develop skills. We want them
to have higher standards of living. We need them in our labor
force, and we are sparing no effort to get them there.
In the past three years, for instance, we have established twenty
industrial education centers at strategic locations across our state.
More than 51,000 North Carolinians have been trained at these
centers, many of them displaced farm workers and young people
who dropped out of school before completing their education.
The second way in which we are tackling this problem is by
building a public school system that will insure every boy and
girl in North Carolina an opportunity to get a good education.
And we are, whenever and wherever possible, encouraging our
young people to take full advantage of this opportunity. We are
speaking frankly to these youngsters. We are telling them that
when they drop out of school at an early age they are, in this
dynamic and highly technical day and time, dooming themselves
to a life of failure. We hope we are getting this message across
because, to a large extent, the future of North Carolina depends
on it.
You have a special stake in what we are trying to do. You also
have a special responsibility. The stake is the future of your
332
Papers of Terry Sanford
people, not as Negroes, but as North Carolinians. The responsi-
bility is to work with the members of your race to make absolutely
certain that they understand all the factors involved and that they
realize that they have a responsibility to themselves, their com-
munities, and their state that transcends any responsibility relat-
ing to race.
In a speech in Little Rock, Arkansas, last week end I said
frankly that we will begin to realize our great potential when,
and only when, we give equal employment opportunities to
Negroes. I said that in this country people of all races must have
equal opportunities in life, that we cannot hold down one seg-
ment of our population without that segment holding us all
down.
Old prejudices are being swept aside. There is a broader base
of understanding between white and Negro citizens than has ever
existed before. Your great-grandfathers were held in actual bond-
age. Your grandfathers and fathers had to contend with social
and economic bondage imposed partly by custom, partly by
environment, partly by prejudice, and partly by lack of edu-
cational opportunity. The vestiges of this bondage remain with
us today, but they are being rapidly erased. The Negro of past
generations could justify his lack of progress by pleading lack of
opportunity, and his complaint was certainly a valid one. The
complaint is still heard today, and in some instances it is still
valid, but it becomes less and less so with each passing day.
Your generation will, in a very short time, see the day when
the legitimate complaint becomes an excuse and the excuse
becomes unacceptable to the thinking people of both races.
Equal opportunity in all areas will be yours. And accompanying
equal opportunity in all areas will be equal responsibility in all
areas. The time for you to begin accepting this responsibility is
now.
Negroes have fought a courageous fight in recent years to
secure their rights as citizens. You have, in most instances, shown
wisdom and patience and honest dedication to your purpose;
and you have every right to be proud of what you have achieved.
But equality, in the truest sense, is not a thing that can be
campaigned for in a picket line nor can it be decreed by a court.
Voltaire once said: "They who say all men are equal speak an
undoubted truth, if they mean that all have an equal right to
liberty, to their property, and to their protection of laws. But they
are mistaken if they think men are equal in their station and
employments, since they are not so by their talents."
The point Voltaire is making is that equality under the law is
one thing, but that equality in all other senses is a very personal
Public Addresses and Summaries
333
thing with each individual. It is a thing that must be earned, not
by petition, but by performance.
It is the God-given right of every man to compete in this world.
But it is not his God-given right to win. This he must do for
himself. In other words, it is the responsibility of every citizen
of North Carolina to honor the Negro's right to equal oppor-
tunities in education and employment. But it is the responsibility
of the individual Negro citizen to take full advantage of those
opportunities. It is vitally important to the future of this state
and all its people that our Negro citizens do just that.
North Carolina's potential is a challenge to every citizen. You
have an important part to play in helping North Carolina meet
that challenge. The job ahead is much too big for us to be side-
tracked by differences that sap our collective strength. We must
keep in mind that this battle which promises such rich spoils can
only be won by all of us working together.
Destiny has handed the Negro citizens of North Carolina a
new and imposing responsibility at easily the most demanding
and most promising period in the history of our state.
I am confident this responsibility will be met.
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF
HOSIERY MANUFACTURERS
Atlantic City, New Jersey
April 29, 1963
Governor Sanford told the National Association of Hosiery
Manufacturers that one half of the hosiery industry was located
in North Carolina, and he invited additional industries to join
those already in the Tar Heel state. After this introduction, he
spoke again on the theme of education as the mission of America.
He reviewed the historical development of the United States,
a country in which each individual was theoretically given a
chance to develop his own capabilities to the fullest. He added
that this dream could not become reality unless all states, com-
munities, the federal government, and all citizens joined in
making education the primary mission of the country. Sanford
cited gaps, such as failure to provide opportunities for retarded
children to develop their limited talents, concluding that the
nation would progress only as individuals progressed.
334
Papers of Terry San ford
CAPITOL PRESS CLUB DINNER HONORING
VICE-PRESIDENT LYNDON B. JOHNSON
Washington, D. C.
May 18, 1963
[Race relations had become a topic of major interest by the spring of
1963, and Governor Sanford took advantage of the opportunity of speaking
in Washington to discuss the situation with this organization of Negro
newsmen. His leadership in the time of turmoil had been outstanding.
The formation of the Good Neighbor Council on January 18, 1963 (see
statement on page 579) was one way in which economic opportunity was
extended to Negroes in North Carolina. Later, on July 5, 1963, at the
height of social unrest in the state, the Mayors' Cooperating Committee,
composed of mayors of twelve cities and towns, was initiated to seek answers
to various aspects of the problem. This address was indicative of the fact
that North Carolina was meeting the challenge in a reasonable and fair
way.]
I am happy to take part in a program honoring Vice-President
Lyndon B. Johnson who has worked so tirelessly against dis-
crimination because of race or religion or region. He is the
sturdy, indomitable champion of fair play. His actions and suc-
cesses contain a lesson for every American who believes that all
men and women should have the broadest possible opportunity
to make the most of their lives.
You know of course that he steered through the Senate the
first civil rights legislation of this century, a personal triumph
acknowledged by his colleagues. Today, with all of his duties,
an aide recently told a national magazine, Mr. Johnson has made
his work as chairman of the President's Committee on Equal
Employment Opportunity his chief day-to-day responsibility. I
have never heard him deliver a speech anywhere on any subject
when there did not shine through his conviction that all men are
entitled to fair play, his belief that the strong must help the weak,
his ambition that this country must be the place where equal
opportunity abounds.
He has done much, but the lesson for the rest of us is that he
has done it in a manner which is lasting, that serves as a foun-
dation for additional progress, in a spirit comprehending the true
and broader goal we seek— good will among all men.
He hasn't sounded the bugle and declared war. He knows from
the history of his own homeland that unwarranted militancy
breeds prejudice and resistance, and that any victory is hollow if
it arises out of bitter combat between brothers.
It would be a tragic denial of the lessons of civilized and
Christian humanity for us to assume that progress in the
Public Addresses and Summaries
335
American democracy can come only from conflict and force. It
will come more surely from good will, and it will be more lasting.
The press of America has ever championed the cause of liberty
and human dignity. It can best do this by promoting broader
understanding of the hopes of minorities, avoiding studiously
the promotion of inflamatory situations. It also has the power to
incite emotions of bitterness and blind rebellion. Restraint is
difficult, but restraint is the mark of civilized man. Restraint is
not weakness; restraint is courage. Restraint in the face of
irresponsibility of others is great courage.
I happen to agree with the historians who argue that slavery
could have been abolished without the fratricide of the Civil War
and without the legacy of bitterness and impoverishment which
that war left with us. The theory of peaceful abolishment never
really got a chance because of hotheads. We suffered because the
hotheads in all parts of the country and on all sides of the question
prevailed then, and we will suffer if the hotheads prevail now.
In a place where we have reaped the bitter fruit of that need-
less conflict, North Carolina hopes to demonstrate to the world
that prejudices can be erased and full opportunities can be
opened up in a climate of restraint and a spirit of good will
with "malice toward none." Others may fight, but we will reason.
Others may operate out of inflamed passions, but we will proceed
with a calm faith in the intrinsic goodness of the children of God.
This is not a time for impatient action even if impatience is
justified. It is important for us to understand that inflamatory
statements by demagogues purporting to work for the rights of
minorities can hurt the cause of the minorities as much as
irrational statements by demagogues who falsely claim to be
speaking for the majority. This is a time for good faith and good
will and a determination that we will help all men and women
achieve their best chance in life because it is the right thing to do.
That is the North Carolina story.
In this century, the leaders and the citizens of North Carolina
have worked toward solutions to these difficult problems involv-
ing as they do deep-seated passions of human beings. At the start
of this century Governor Charles Brantley Aycock, who turned
a race campaign into a crusade for education, threatened to
resign as Governor of North Carolina if the General Assembly
did not provide schools for the Negro children as well as for the
whites. In the early 1940's Governor R. Gregg Cherry sent North
Carolina highway patrolmen into a community in which a race
riot was threatened. In the next administration, Governor W.
Kerr Scott broke color lines that had stood since Reconstruction
by appointing a Negro to the State Board of Education. In the
336
Papers of Terry San ford
late 1940's an attempt to revive the Ku Klux Klan in North Caro-
lina was crushed with the full weight of the state and local govern-
ment, and the Grand Kleagle was sent to prison. Under Governor
William B. Umstead, North Carolina refused to get into the
massive resistance business after the Brown decision of 1954.
It peacefully began desegregation of schools during the adminis-
tration of Governor Luther Hodges, who now is Secretary of
Commerce. An incident on that touchy September day when,
without any court order and without any pressure, schools volun-
tarily and peacefully integrated in Winston-Salem, Greensboro,
and Charlotte— our three largest cities— is worth recalling here.
Some youngster or some adult, without an adult's mind, had
painted a "Negro go home" sign on the steps at R. J. Reynolds
High School. The white students, proud of their high school,
got down on their knees and scrubbed it off.
Since that time at the University of North Carolina at Chapel
Hill, one of the Negro law students has served in the highest
position possible for a law student to serve— as editor of the Law
Review.
More Negroes serve by appointment of the administration on
policy-making boards in North Carolina than, I suspect, in any
other state in the union. North Carolina, without demonstrations
and without court orders, peacefully integrated its state parks
in 1962. North Carolina, without demonstrations and without
court orders, abolished segregated rest rooms in state government
buildings in 1961. North Carolina, because of the votes of white
precincts as well as precincts in which Negro voters predominate,
has elected Negroes to the city councils of a good many of its
cities and towns.
Public order has been characteristic of North Carolina. As
you know there was practically nothing filed on the wire services
during the time the Freedom Riders were passing through North
Carolina in 1962. I'his was because there were no incidents. We
did have one mob scene. While the riders were in the Raleigh
bus station, we had a mob around the Pepsi Cola machine which,
through some quirk of mechanical fate, was putting out free
Pepsis.
We are now attempting in North Carolina to provide all
citizens the chance to make a better living. We have called on
the people to remove the barriers of discrimination in employ-
ment, and they are responding as we expected. We call this the
Good Neighbor Program, and we have enlisted some of the
outstanding citizens of the state to serve on this council. We are
doing this because we know we cannot prosper if a quarter of
Public Addresses and Summaries
337
our people cannot find adequate jobs, but we are also doing it
because we believe in the dignity of the individual.
I report these things to you not to say that we have all of
the answers. We don't. We do have a belief, however, that most
people believe in fair play.
I think it important that the press of America report occasion-
ally progress which is made as well as the difficult situations which
inevitably occur in northern states as well as in southern states.
Now, I fully appreciate the fact that a Boy Scout leading an old
lady across the street is not as big news as a young juvenile delin-
quent running the same old lady down with a hot rod. But, I
believe you will agree with me that you can sometimes get a
highly distorted picture when you report only on the hot rods.
Americans have the opportunity for showing the newly freed
nations of Africa and the Middle East and of Asia how to make
democracy work. I think that we have to let these people know
from time to time that while we have not achieved 100 per cent
of our democratic goals that we are striving constantly to achieve
those principles and that we are making significant headway.
North Carolinians, without a whole lot of ballyhoo, have been
attempting for some years to achieve the ideals of the Declaration
of Independence. We believe that negotiations, carried forward
in good faith on both sides, serve a more lasting purpose and
build a stronger foundation for good will between peoples than
demonstrations.
We believe that rights are accompanied by responsibilities,
including responsibility of restraint. It is a truism that sometimes
discretion is the better part of valor. I would suggest that in this
sensitive time in which we are now passing that the Negro
leadership, which has long exhibited a high degree of responsi-
bility, as well as determination for full freedom, can assist in the
great progress of all citizens through good will. The exercise of
mutual respect by both white and Negro citizens does not curtail
the right of either.
We now are engaged in a long and bitter struggle with the
Communist ideology which respects the rights of neither a
majority nor the minority, which exploits on the international
scene the natural resentments of newly freed peoples. As any one
of you who covers the Department of State knows, America could
win a lot of arguments with the big bomb.
As a nation, we are attempting to win this cold war without
blasting. We are attempting to do it at the council tables of the
United Nations and through the Organization of American
States. We are, in short, committed to use force only as a last
resort. Sometimes we don't always get all we seek. Sometimes we
338
Papers of Terry Sanford
have to tolerate a great deal from other countries whose phi-
losophy is diametrically opposed to ours. We believe this patience
is justified. I would suggest that in the domestic struggles, you
might sometimes win a war and lose the peace.
The obstacles faced by Negroes in your generation and mine
are being removed. This cannot be done by force or by legal
rights alone. Our responsibilities are far more complex and
broader than that. Jobs and full rights cannot come except
through education. Education is the number-one job in America
today, and it requires our best efforts. Educational institutions,
no matter how good, cannot have full effect on the children of
slums and poverty. Our best efforts are required to remove these
blights.
North Carolina has based its hopes for the future, all of its
hopes, on a rapidly expanding and enriched system of schools and
colleges. We expect our educational opportunities to be the best
in the nation. This is the path to all of our goals for all races.
The education of our children is the best way to achieve their
rights and opportunities.
With you tonight, I salute the Vice-President of the United
States of America, a man of good will, a man of good faith, a
man of restraint, courage and understanding, a man of compassion
for the hopes of others.
I pledge my state to good will, good faith, restraint, courage,
understanding, and compassion.
1963 COMMENCEMENT EXERCISES
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA
Chapel Hill
June 3, 1963
Governor O. Max Gardner felt that his greatest contribution
to the state was the consolidation of the University of North
Carolina. Governor Sanford agreed that Gardner's appraisal was
correct, pointing out that the university had carried out its
primary purpose of educating men and women and thereby giving
them better and fuller lives. He said that the Chapel Hill uni-
versity had been giving such advantages since 1795, the branch
in Raleigh since 1887, and the Greensboro institution since
1891. The demands and needs of 1963 required re-evaluation,
and Sanford referred to the study by the Commission on Edu-
cation Beyond the High School, the trustees, and the General
Public Addresses and Summaries
339
Assembly. He said that a diploma from any branch of the Uni-
versity of North Carolina was a certificate of achievement and also
a debt to the faculty, administration, and trustees of the univer-
sity; to parents; and to all 4,600,000 citizens of North Carolina.
GOVERNOR'S SCHOOL OF NORTH CAROLINA
Winston-Salem
June 10, 1963
[The goal of offering each student the opportunity to develop his indi-
vidual potential to the fullest was well known to educators and to the
Sanford administration. With such a purpose in mind, the Governor's School,
for gifted children, opened for its first eight-week session in the summer of
1963. In March, 1962, the Commission to Study the Public School Educa-
tion of Exceptionally Talented Children had submitted its final report to
the Governor. One of its seven recommendations was a summer program
on a local or regional basis. With a grant from the Carnegie Foundation
and other private sources, the school was authorized for three years with
the expectation that it would be continued thereafter with state funds. The
Governor addressed the 400 high school students at the opening on the
Salem College campus in Winston-Salem on June 10, 1963. No credits or
grades were given to these outstanding young people, the sole purpose of
the school being to "stretch" the minds and abilities of those in attendance.]
I came here tonight to have supper with you and to say hello.
It seemed to me that a school named the Governor's School ought
to have a governor somewhere about.
Also I wanted to be sure that you students can still get your
hats on. A friend warned me last week that your selection might
have given you the big head.
I suspect it hasn't and hope it hasn't, and I am confident that
by the time this faculty has finished with you, you'll all be as
humble as can be.
Actually there are many other students who might be here,
who weren't nominated or who in the judging didn't show up
as well for one reason or another on a certain day. It's not our
claim that we have the top 400 rising sophomore and junior
high school students of the state; we do claim to have 400 of
the top students, and each one has won fairly his right to be here.
Such a school as this has never been held, either here in North
Carolina or anywhere else, and I believe you will learn a lot
from being here, and from meeting with this excellent faculty and
with each other. Gifted students doubtless learn not only from
important ideas and gifted teachers but from working with other
students of like ability and interests. It is democratic and fair
340
Papers of Terry Sanford
to give them a chance to do so, to give every person we can the
chance to develop fully his natural talents.
In preparing for this talk, I have tried to focus on the gener-
ation you students represent. You were born just after World
War II, so you didn't know about the war firsthand. You have
lived all your lives in the time of the cold war. This has been a
dangerous period, too, and no doubt the tension has taken a toll
on you, whether you realize it or not. If we could hook you 400
students up to a testing apparatus— and I'm just as glad we can-
not—we might find that you are jittery by force of habit. You
have been waiting for catastrophe all your lives. And here you
are tonight, and it hasn't struck yet. The^dangers still exist,
however.
You have also lived in a period of social unrest. We are this
summer in a peak phase of that unrest, and this state is certainly
in the middle of things.
You live in a time which is unsettled in other ways. For
example, when I was a boy the average American traveled in
vehicles of some sort 350 miles to get here to school. You very
likely travel many times that far in a year. The average salesman
travels ninety or a hundred times that far a year. I don't know
what the average governor travels, but it's a long way. And this
is the different sort of world you are living in, and the only kind
of world you have ever known.
By such statistics we see that we are going faster, we are going
farther, we are moving more often. I believe we are more
venturesome, too. This is the age of investigation. We are taking
our chances and making discoveries.
The same exploratory spirit characterizes the arts, the sciences,
and most of the other forms of work and learning^. We are told
that during the past twenty years, man's total knowledge has
doubled. That is an astounding increase. Almost within the span
of your lifetime we have doubled the findings of all previous
generations. And the process continues. Not only that, but it
accelerates, and today it is impossible for anybody to have as
large a per cent of man's total knowledge as a brilliant scholar
of a few decades back might have mastered.
We might add that this increase in knowledge is changing the
balance among the disciplines, so that today many thoughtful
people are concerned about the shift toward a technically-oriented
society. They argue that the new knowledge should not replace
the old, that what man has considered basic to education down
through the years should not now be replaced by the sciences.
They tell us that specialization will fragment our society and
Public Addresses and Summaries
341
might produce men and women who cannot see the forest for
trees.
The argument is not entirely on one side, however. The
sciences have obviously improved our way of life. Not many of us
would care to go back to the medical facilities of a previous
generation, or abandon the many new powerful tools which are
at our disposal. Also there has always been specialization; we find
specialization to an advanced degree in the old-line disciplines
which now seek to limit specialization in the sciences.
Beyond the range of this important debate, which is far more
complex than my representation of it here, which is one of the
most important debates of our time, we have the fact that the
Russians have already decided. They have put technology at the
center of their planned society. We will be in competition with
that society, with their technology, and we will need to do what
we must to preserve our freedom. That is a very practical con-
sideration.
As you see, technological changes are pressing upon us changes
in value judgments. We are making changes in value judgments
all across the board. For example, when I was a boy, if a man
traveled a lot, he was considered to be unreliable. He was not
worth lending money to; he was not considered a safe risk. Today
many of the best men in the country are traveling around a lot,
including many of the bankers.
When I was young, a person could decide he would be a doctor,
a lawyer, a farmer, a teacher, or whatever. Today he often must
be more specific. What sort of doctor? What sort of lawyer? What
sort of farmer? What sort of teacher?
When I was young, a person might train himself or herself for
a profession and have assurance that the profession would offer
a lifetime of productive work. Today the professions change
rapidly, and new ones appear to challenge or replace some exist-
ing ones.
Meanwhile, as we move swiftly into a different sort of world,
we drag behind us some old and costly problems. In our state,
25 per cent of the adults who go to take a driver's test cannot
read the questions or write down their own answers. A high
percentage of our people has never been given a chance to learn
a technical skill. We have in our schools a high dropout rate,
twice the national average. Half the students who enter our
schools in the first grade never finish high school. We have much
poverty in the state. Some of you who are here come from poor
families, crumbling neighborhoods. We have a considerable
amount of racial animosity and tension, which is particularly
apparent at this time. All these lines which divide us into edu-
342
Papers of Terry Sanford
cated and uneducated, trained and untrained, rich and hungry,
free and not-so-free must be examined, and the lines of com-
munication between our different groups must be opened. We
must seek solutions to our problems that are realistic and fair,
and which admit that all of us are citizens of one state and that
we will rise or fall together.
I was brought up to believe that change is abnormal and that
a state of rest was normal. We come now to see that change is
normal. Since World War II, since the time when you students
were born, we have come in our country to change our ideas about
that significant point. Change is normal, and we have to stay on
our toes to keep up with it and do an adequate job of representing
our society and our own best interests today. What is in a state
of rest is in a precarious position.
There opened on Broadway this season a play titled Stop the
World, I Want to Get Off. I like that title very well, but it
doesn't suggest a solution to our problems. Nor does it reflect the
fact that mankind has never had a day which is more interesting
than this one, which offers greater opportunities than this one. We
are today on a frontier. It is not a frontier of trees and new land,
but it is a frontier just the same. It is in one sense a whole series
of worlds to conquer. What we need are young men and women
who can train themselves to explore and develop them. We need
today men and women who can go deeper than men have thus far
gone into the worlds of the mind and emotions. We need men
and women to take their places on the moral frontiers of our age,
which are the frontiers of ages past, as well. We need men and
women who can work with the hard, tough problems of poverty
and ignorance. We need men and women who can go into the
worlds of music and the other arts, where so often are reflected
the soul and temper of man. We need men and women who can
keep this country in the lead in the race for outer space and the
new worlds there.
I hope that each of you 400 young people will take your place
in one or more of these frontiers. For eight weeks here in this
school, each of you will be able to explore one of them, and at
the same time each will be exposed to great ideas which have
shaped the heritage of Western Man. You 400 students compose
a most unusual community and are a composite of our needs; you
reflect well the hopes we have for the future of our people here
in our country and state.
I mention the state so often because I want you to find your
life work here. North Carolina is not a world unto itself, and I
don't present it as such; at the same time, you are going to have
to select a part of the world for your home, and I recommend this,
Public Addresses and Summaries
343
your home state, to you. We are losing many of our best young
people every year, and we ought not to continue to do so. We
need you right here. North Carolina has made as much progress
during this century as any state in the union. We are building
solidly and we are doing good work. Maybe you can help us do
better. You can help take North Carolina into the lead.
Therefore, I hope this school, as it helps to prepare you for the
future, will emphasize challenges which face us here in our own
part of the world. We got ourselves in a hole in North Carolina
back about one hundred years ago. We have been in that hole
for many decades, but we are winning our way out on our own
terms and with our own resources and leadership. We have made
more progress in the last fifty years than any other state in the
union. Now we very much need your help and that of your
friends back home.
You are to be here for only eight weeks, and that's much too
short at time to solve all the problems of the universe or master
all the techniques of your art or learn all the knowledge of your
discipline. The school has been designed so that both students
and teachers can choose what interests them most, and the school
can become what you make it, as you work together and work
it out. Next year perhaps a different design will evolve. The
curriculum and schedule ought not to be locked down. Let the
school change to reflect the interests and spirit of young people;
let it change as the society changes and discovers new challenges;
let it be responsive to its experimental nature and be for all
its many students an adventure in education.
For you, I hope this summer is a memorable and enjoyable
time.
SUMMER WORKSHOP
SOUTHERN REGIONAL EDUCATION BOARD
Chapel Hill
June 12, 1963
While not a legally required meeting of the Southern Regional
Education Board, the summer workshops gave opportunities to
review accomplishments, evaluate programs, and consider crises.
Governor Sanford observed that educational attainment was a
most important factor in economic growth, that areas with the
highest average level of educational achievement were the centers
of industry and commerce. He said that economic growth de-
344
Papers of Terry Sanford
pended on technology which depended on science which depended
on education. After reviewing progress made in North Carolina
by the 1961 and 1963 legislatures, the Governor called attention
to the opportunities made possible thereby. Groups of responsible
leaders, such as the group attending the workshop, were called
on to show citizens the way to fulfill the opportunity confronting
them and to move forward with courage.
NORTH CAROLINA ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS
Durham
June 17, 1963
[As he had done two years earlier. Governor Sanford used die occasion
of his appearance before die North Carolina Association of Broadcasters to
review the work of the General Assembly. He praised the 1963 legislators
for refusing to "heed those voices of timidity and trepidation" and for
adopting "the broadest-based and most far-reaching . . . higher education
(program) in the nation." He concluded with a defense of the General
Assembly which had been called a "do-little legislature" by some North
Carolinians.]
When the Constitutional Convention of the United States
met in 1787, there were critics both inside and outside of that
hall in Philadelphia who despaired of the delegates ever doing
anything that would last a year— much less the 174 years that it
has lasted. Since the adoption of the Constitution, there have
been cries of anguish against each of the Congresses.
In the history of North Carolina, there has never been a Gen-
eral Assembly which did not receive at least as much criticism as
it received praise.
The 1963 General Assembly of North Carolina has been held
up by certain critics for sins of commission as well as sins of
omission. A disproportionally large amount of public discussion
of the legislative bodies of our state has been devoted to what
the members of the General Assembly were doing wrong. In this
respect, our General Assembly is in the company of all legislative
bodies of all time.
Criticism of a legislative body is expected in a democratic
state. Under our guarantees of free speech and a free press, which
includes the important media of radio and television, it is not
necessary that that criticism always be valid or even that that
criticism always be based on valid information. A member of
the General Assembly of North Carolina is very much like the
Public Addresses and Summaries
345
baseball player who bats .300 for the season and gets booed when-
ever he happens to strike out.
I might add, while we are talking about baseball, the Governor
of North Carolina is something like the third base coach. The big
difference is that the base runner usually pays attention to the
third base coach.
The truth is that the writing of laws by a free assembly is one
of the most unexpeditious methods of government ever devised.
But there has never been a system devised which is a better way
for all the people of all sections of a state to express their needs
and their hopes. And, if it is not always so efficient, it is demo-
cratic and it is the best possible way known throughout the
history of governments to get the will of the people put into the
effect of laws.
I would like to discuss with you a few of the positive things
that this General Assembly was doing while some critics were
shouting it was doing nothing.
For example, here is the state budget for the next two years.
This is the law. This is money. It is a requisition for the service
needed and demanded by North Carolinians.
There are several thousand pages to this budget— and a good
many dollars. The General Assembly has been through each
line, item by item, and has given careful attention to these needs.
It is a fiscally-bound budget for a forward-bound state. This
budget provides the means for a state on the go.
There has been talk of the increasing costs of government. This
criticism, of course, deliberately overlooks the fact that North
Carolina ranks in the bottom five of all the states in the nation
in per capita taxation, in the number of public employees, and
in indebtedness. I think this is a pretty good record.
Such criticism also deliberately ignores the twin facts of an
ever-growing population. For example, every time we have thirty
or more children coming up to the first grade, we need another
teacher, books and equipment, and all of those things that sup-
port teaching. It also overlooks the fact that the cost of books,
and asphalt and concrete, and the equipment, and all of the other
items which are needed to serve the citizens of North Carolina
have their own increasing costs.
Now let's look and see where our taxes are going because the
most important single piece of legislation is the budget.
More than half of the $1.2 billion of state funds in this budget
is devoted to the number-one obligation of the state government
of North Carolina: education.
At the outset of the General Assembly, there was a clear
determination that we would not heed those voices of timidity
346
Papers of Terry San ford
and trepidation. There was determination that we would not
listen to the whispers that came from the fearful who have always
opposed the accomplishments on which they would have rested
in February of this year. This was not, and is not, the spirit of
North Carolina. This was not the spirit of the 1963 General
Assembly.
This General Assembly continued hard on the course set by the
1961 General Assembly— which provided more additional support
for education of your sons and daughters than any General
Assembly in the history of North Carolina and more than any
General Assembly in the entire nation. The 1963 General
Assembly held fast to this course for education as the number-
one need for North Carolina and as the number-one hope for
North Carolinians.
This year, for the first time in the history of our state through-
out all the years, every red cent requested by the State Board
of Education was approved by the Advisory Budget Commission
and by this administration and sent forward to the General
Assembly for its sympathetic consideration. The overwhelming
majority of the members of the 1963 General Assembly approved
close to 100 per cent those requests for public schools for our
boys and girls. This included more than $500 million needed to
maintain the services at their current level and almost $50 million
more to enrich the educational opportunities of the children of
our state. This is a lot of money. But the men and women of
North Carolina have a lot of children— well over one million
of these children are in the public schools today.
And although the cost was not nearly so great, the need to give
a helping hand to retarded children was greater. Every citizen
of North Carolina should applaud the action of the General
Assembly during these last few weeks— when some have sug-
gested it should be getting out of town— in appropriating the
funds necessary for these forgotten children of North Carolina
and providing the fullest and most far-reaching program we have
ever had.
At the other end of the scale, this General Assembly provided
for the expansion of special classes for the talented children, so
that they might develop these greater talents to the fullest for
their own benefit and the benefit of this state, of this nation, and
our world in an age of technology and science.
A major addition in education came just last week when the
State Senate approved extending the educational television sys-
tem to the western and eastern corners of our state. I know that
many of the stations represented here today have co-operated
in the past with WUNC-TV in using television as a vast network
Public Addresses and Summaries
347
for enlightenment. Now the children of the mountain coves and
of the farm towns of eastern North Carolina and of the fishing
villages along the Atlantic coast will have an opportunity for
the first time to receive the best of instruction available through
television.
In order to train students so that they may acquire skills
needed for new and diversified industry, the General Assembly
inserted into this budget major advancements for vocational
training and for industrial education.
There was a time in the memory of some of us when a college
education or any education beyond a high school diploma was
something to be gotten through the school of hard knocks. We
still have our school of hard knocks. But thanks to the work of
the 1963 General Assembly, the boys and girls of this state in this
generation and in future generations will have a better chance
to get the educational equipment they need to turn those hard
knocks into knocks of opportunity.
The General Assembly did this by adopting the Higher Edu-
cation Act, which ranks among the broadest-based and most far-
reaching pieces of legislation on higher education in the nation.
In our state, this act will take its place along side the action of
the 1931 General Assembly when it consolidated the university
and with the provision of the Revolutionary Constitution of
North Carolina which authorized the establishment of the uni-
versity.
Now, what does this Higher Education Bill do? We could
profitably spend several thirty-minute programs discussing this.
But briefly to summarize the act, here are the three major
accomplishments :
1. It authorizes a system of comprehensive community colleges
across North Carolina when, where, and as needed. These com-
munity colleges will mean that young men and young women
who never would have been able to go to Chapel Hill or to
Raleigh or to Boone or to Greenville for college educations will
now have the opportunity for college training. It means that
these young men and women will be able to live and work at
home and avoid the expense, which to all too many is prohibitive,
of going away to college. This community college system also will
benefit all the taxpayers of North Carolina for it will relieve some
of the pressure for new buildings at our established colleges.
Moreover, it is obvious that these community colleges will enrich
the communities where they are located.
2. It authorizes an upgrading of the three campuses of the
University of North Carolina, and especially those in Raleigh
and in Greensboro. Because of this act, the University of North
348
Papers of Terry Sanford
Carolina at Greensboro will be able to award degrees that
previously it had not been able to award, and it will be able
to award them to men and women alike. North Carolina State of
the University of North Carolina at Raleigh will be able to offer
liberal arts and other programs which were unavailable there.
3. The Higher Education Act provided also for three new
senior colleges at Wilmington, Charlotte, and Asheville. It might
be interesting to note that in the three hundred years of North
Carolina history, this state built twelve state-supported colleges.
As an indication of the increased and rapidly increasing needs,
in 1963 we have authorized the building of three additional
senior colleges in three of the more populous areas of our state.
Does that sound like a "do-little legislature"?
I think it is the greatest advance in higher education in the
history of the state, and I know that right now North Carolina is
being looked to with envy by other states across this nation.
Where else is your tax money going? Well, for one thing, this
General Assembly stopped additional diversions of highway funds
and routed them to the purpose for which they were collected—
the building and maintenance of roads and streets. Remember
that North Carolina, because we have a single system, has 10
per cent of all the state-operated highways and roads in the
nation and supports this 10 per cent on only 3 per cent of the
total collection of road taxes in America. Remember also that
North Carolina has more paved secondary roads than the great
state of Texas. It has more paved state-operated roads per capita
than any state in the nation.
Naturally, we want more roads, we want more roads paved,
widened, and improved, but even in 1962, with all of these
desires for better roads, with all of this record of the best road
system in all of America, we built more secondary roads last
year than in any year since Governor Kerr Scott's road bond
issue, and we increased, while doing this, interstate and primary
mileage by 10 per cent over any previous record.
We intend to see that the taxes paid by motorists are used for
the benefit of the motoring public. We will do this because we
want all-weather school bus routes, because we want the farmer
to be able to get to town and the man in town to be able to get
to the farm. We also will do it because we intend to keep on
building our tourist and travel industry which already is pro-
ducing almost $1 billion a year in North Carolina.
At least of equal importance to building good roads is the
maintaining of safe roads. Every single day of the year, I get
three or more slips of paper from the Motor Vehicles Depart-
Public Addresses and Summaries
349
ment. These slips each represent deaths on the highways and
streets of North Carolina.
It would have been easy simply to file these slips and forget
them, because the members of the General Assembly understand
no popularity contests have ever been won in North Carolina—
or in any other state for that matter— by cracking down on drivers.
This administration could not ignore the 1,300 burials we had
last year in North Carolina. That is why we proposed a major
traffic safety program to the General Assembly.
The majority of the members of the General Assembly agreed
on the majority of the safety bills introduced. We did not get
all of the nine points through. But we did get more major
traffic safety legislation passed in this General Assembly than in
any General Assembly within our lifetimes. As you know, those
acts include a chemical test for drinking drivers, driver training
and probationary licenses for young drivers who have a dispro-
portionately large number of accidents, and the requirements
that seat belts be installed in all new cars. The General Assembly
also provided for additional highway patrolmen and for the
establishment of a permanent Coordinating Committee on Traffic
Safety.
There has been increasing concern that the utilities laws of
our state strike a fair balance between the public's right for fair
prices and the companies' right for a fair return. Exhaustive
studies have been made of the utility laws, and legislation is now
pending in the House of Representatives; and I am sure that the
utilities situation will be better when the General Assembly
leaves than it was when the members arrived.
The most beneficial item in the new bill is the authorization
for a public advocate to argue the public's side of rate cases and
other cases, and a rate expert to represent the public in rate
determinations.
In this age of atomic energy and the race in space, North Caro-
lina's General Assembly has decided that we are not going to
lag behind, as unfortunately we did during the Industrial
Revolution.
Among steps upward taken by the General Assembly this year
was the establishment of a space center at the Research Triangle
and a significant strengthening of the schools of science at state-
supported institutions of higher learning.
As we worked on the slide rules of space in the General
Assembly, we have not forgotten the easel, the baton, and the
pen of the creative talents of North Carolinians. The 1963
General Assembly moved to preserve one of the unique attractions
of North Carolina when it gave legislative sanction and mone-
350
Papers of Terry Sanford
tary support of the Outer Banks Commission. The administration
and the General Assembly are vitally interested in this program
of conservation and preservation, not only as a scenic wonder-
land but also because of the hard fact that the Atlantic Ocean
could well flow into the streets of our coastal towns if we allow
those banks to be destroyed.
A strong measure of support was invested in our deep-water
ports at Morehead City and Wilmington. This money will be
repaid to the people of the state many times over by additional
international commerce.
At the other end of the state, the General Assembly provided
for a major new agricultural research station in the mountains.
And it substantially improved the campaign for the highly
important food processing industry, both at State College and
throughout the state.
North Carolina long has prided itself as a state where the weak
could grow strong and the strong would grow great. There are
many reasons for this state to devote more attention to helping
the weak. The chief method we are using is education. But many
other ways and means were considered by the 1963 General
Assembly.
North Carolina is the only southeastern state with a state
minimum wage law. After many years of defeat, it was adopted
in 1959. It was extended to cover many additional people in
1961. In this session of the General Assembly, the minimum
wage was raised from 75 cents to 85 cents per hour. This was 15
cents less than this administration sought, but it was 85 cents
more than some lobbyists wanted.
It is an improvement. Counting both the additional wages
for the lowest bracket and the consequent increases up the line,
this improvement in the minimum wage act should mean more
than $10 million in increased wages for North Carolinians.
The workmen's compensation benefits were increased. As in
the minimum wage, many of us hoped these benefits would be
increased more than they were. But if the amount was modest,
the direction of the legislation by the General Assembly was
right.
In other areas of humane legislation, greater protection was
provided for migrant farm laborers, a new school for the deaf
was implemented at Wilson, medical aid for the aged was set up,
and additional medical aid for the indigent was authorized.
The General Assembly provided new funds for hospitals,
especially mental hospitals. The General Assembly also approved
a new Department of Mental Health which will continue the
Public Addresses and Summaries
351
efforts to see that North Carolina not only cares for, but cures
the mentally ill.
These then are a few of the achievements of the 1963 General
Assembly.
The members have been working throughout this session at
great personal sacrifice, leaving their work, leaving their families,
coming to Raleigh to work long hours. The members have been
working without pay this last week. They will work without pay
all of this week, primarily on a fair redistricting bill. I am
confident that they will adopt such a bill.
They are working overtime for you who are assembled here,
and for you who are listening on your radio, and for those of
you who are watching on television. They are working for all
of the citizens of North Carolina.
You and I may not agree with everything they have done. But
then you and your neighbors would not agree with each other on
everything. And you and your cousins from the other end of
the state certainly would not agree on everything.
They have been working hard. They have been working
conscientiously. They have been working for the benefit of the
future of North Carolina. They have been working with the
desire to keep North Carolina moving forward, opening up new
opportunities for all of our people, for our boys and girls, for
people who are looking for a better chance in life.
In a democracy any citizen can criticize his legislature and his
government any time he wants to. And he should. But the mem-
bers of the 1963 General Assembly cannot honestly be critized
for "doing little."
This General Assembly truly has compiled a record that is
fiscally sound and forward bound.
Thank you.
STATE FUTURE FARMERS OF AMERICA CONVENTION
Raleigh
June 27, 1963
Governor Sanford first expressed appreciation for the oppor-
tunity of discussing farming with the Future Farmers. Of all the
problems surrounding agriculture— migration from the country
because of mechanization, problems of disease, drought, and
flood— the major one facing North Carolina was distribution.
State College, the State Department of Agriculture, and research
352
Papers of Terry Sanford
stations were working together in the field of food processing.
The results of processing of tobacco, cotton, and forest products
showed the value of this enterprise and pointed up the need of
increased attention to processing other products. Other problems,
the Governor said, were also of concern to future farmers. Sur-
pluses, for example, should be used to feed the hungry; Sanford
commended the idea of the World Food Bank and called on
the Future Farmers to consider feeding and clothing people all
over the world. Though there were many problems in the area
of farming, the Governor expressed confidence that solutions
would be found.
LEGISLATIVE WORK CONFERENCE
SOUTHERN REGIONAL EDUCATION BOARD
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
August 8, 1963
Governor Sanford spoke on the value of life-long education
when he addressed a group of the Southern Regional Education
Board. He said that changing techniques required additional
training and that men to whom continuing education was avail-
able were the lucky ones. The gradual shift from farm and blue-
collar work to white-collar occupations meant a labor force
inadequately trained; adult education was essential. Sanford
mentioned television as one solution, but he encouraged the
Southern Regional Education Board to find ways to measure the
need for adult education successfully. He felt that each state would
have to work out its own plans, but voluntary co-operation
between institutions within the framework of the state system of
higher education would have to be encouraged. He stressed the
necessity of training with permanence rather than training with
built-in obsolescence. The Governor, in his final remarks to the
group, asked that citizens be offered "a lifetime of learning as the
birthright for every man, to the end that he be an even more
productive and effective member of society."
Public Addresses and Summaries
353
CONVENTION OF
ASSOCIATED MASTER BARBERS OF NORTH CAROLINA
Durham
September 2, 1963
[It is obvious to anyone reading this speech that Governor Sanford thor-
oughly enjoyed the occasion. The barbers, too, undoubtedly enjoyed the
remarks of the Governor when he talked about "crew cuts, duck-tails, Elvis
Presley sideburns," and about other down-to-earth aspects of barbering. As
he often did, he devoted his remarks on the serious side to the subject of
education, ending with the comment that to stop or to slow the "forward
movement in education now would be as senseless as a barber putting down
his clippers after he had trimmed just one side of a customer's head."]
I am happy for this chance to speak to the Master Barbers of
North Carolina. I mean that. I have been listening to you for
forty years and now you've given me a chance to say something
back.
The cost of haircuts has gone up over the years since I first
started getting them. But this is understandable.
In what other profession is a man required to be a master in
his own work and also be able to predict with more accuracy
than the U.S. Weather Bureau whether the weather will be
good for golfing over the week end— tell the best kind of bait
to use on the fishing trip— recite the Dow-Jones averages for the
day— recall what Mickey Mantle batted in 1956 and in which
round Joe Louis dropped Tony Galento— assess the megaton
capabilities of the Russians— guide the salesman on the best
route to the coast and the best place to stay and what to see once
he gets there.
Who besides the barber is expected to do his primary duty and,
as a fringe benefit for his customer, advise the college boy on
how to make up with his girl friend, and the married man on the
best store at which to buy an anniversary present. Who else
carries an encyclopedia of information on matters so diverse as
the current figures on the Gross National Product, tobacco prices
on the Eastern Belt, and Jayne Mansfield?
But as heavy as the requirements of learning for master
barbers are today, they are not as great as they once were. You
know in olden days, barbers not only gave haircuts and shaves,
but they also pulled teeth and did certain surgical work.
Your profession has a long and useful and honorable history.
The strength of barbering is shown by the fact that you have
survived crew cuts, duck-tails, Elvis Presley sideburns, electric
razors and do-it-yourself barber kits, Steve Canyon streaks and
peroxides, that "greasy kid stuff," and Yul Brynner.
354
Papers of Terry Sanford
Your profession has made great progress over the years. I know
it has had a great effect on my profession of law. English lawyers
and those on the continent started wearing wigs centuries ago.
And they wear them until this day. I suspect that the reason
American lawyers don't wear wigs like their European counter-
parts is that American barbers do a much better job of shaping
a dignified and judicial head of hair.
The art of barbering has properly been memorialized in
songs— all the way from Barber Shop Quartet ditties like "Shave
and a haircut, two bits. Who's the barber, Tom Mix," to Rossini's
great opera, The Barber of Seville.
The Marshall Plan and the Truman Doctrine and the Korean
Conflict may have contained creeping communism, but it took
the Master Barbers of North Carolina and other states to con-
tain creeping dandruff.
I'm sure you enjoyed the poem by Dennis the Menace in the
comics the other day: "Clip, clip, scissors and snip; spare my ear
and button your lip!" But seriously, I have always agreed with
that old barber shop sign that says: "There is nothing that costs
so little and improves a man's appearance so much as a hair-
cut." Let me add, that maybe besides hitting a hole in one,
there is nothing that makes a man feel so good.
I would like to discuss with you for a little while tonight some-
thing that concerns you as barbers and as citizens and, most of all,
as parents. I am speaking, of course, of education.
In 1961, thanks to the courage of the overwhelming majority
of the members of the General Assembly, North Carolina appro-
priated more new funds for the education of your sons and
daughters than ever before in the history of this state. In doing
so— in adopting the quality education program— these legislators
gave North Carolina's public school system the greatest rate of
increased support of any of the fifty states in the entire nation.
But they didn't stop there. In 1963 most of those same legis-
lators were back. And the 1963 General Assembly adopted almost
100 per cent of the money asked by the State Board of Education
to keep our children going up the ladder.
Besides the program of progress for the public schools, the
1963 General Assembly also adopted one of the broadest-based
and one of the most far-reaching programs for higher education
ever adopted in America.
Under this Higher Education Act, North Carolina will build
three new senior colleges— at Wilmington in the East, at Char-
lotte in the Piedmont, and at Asheville in the Mountains. Under
this act, a system of comprehensive community colleges has been
authorized. These comprehensive, two-year institutions will pro-
Public Addresses and Summaries
355
vide the first two years of college work for those who will be
going on to the university or one of the state's senior colleges. But
just as important as that, these community colleges also will
offer courses in vocational and technological training for the
young men and women who are not seeking college degrees. These
will be courses designed to prepare young men and women for
jobs. The community colleges will work closely with the twenty
industrial education centers which we now have across the state.
The third major step in the Higher Education Act of 1963
was the upgrading of the University of North Carolina. And
when I speak of the university, I mean, of course, all three
branches of the university: the university at Chapel Hill, the uni-
versity at Raleigh, and the university at Greensboro.
The 1963 General Assembly also approved a pilot program for
greater vocational and industrial education in the high schools of
our state. In other areas, it provided funds for especially bright
students, and it provided funds for those whom we call "average"
students, and it provided funds to launch a program for the
retarded children. These programs cost money. Your money. Your
tax money. The cost of education has gone up.
And as long as North Carolina's men and women keep getting
married and keep having babies, and as long as inventors keep
inventing new machines that require greater skills and greater
knowledge, and as long as our society keeps getting more com-
plex with human problems, and as long as fathers and mothers
want a better chance in life for their children, the cost of edu-
cation is going to rise.
The cost of education has risen just as the price of food has
risen— although not nearly so much; the cost of education has
gone up just like the price of cars has gone up— but not nearly so
much; the cost of school buildings has jumped just like the wages
of carpenters and electricians and plumbers and painters have
jumped; the cost of learning has risen just like the cost of cutting
hair.
I believe you gentlemen here tonight who work on heads will
agree that we need to keep a boy's head trimmed and combed
on the outside and his brain trained and keen on the inside.
We in North Carolina have just gotten started well on our
quality education program. When the 1961 General Assembly
adjourned, it had made more progress for our children than
any legislature in the history of our state. But the job wasn't
done.
The 1963 General Assembly adopted one of the greatest
higher education acts ever adopted by a General Assembly in
this or any other state. But the task isn't completed. To stop or
356
Papers of Terry Sanford
even to slow our forward movement in education now would be
as senseless as a barber putting down his clippers after he had
trimmed just one side of a customer's head.
NORTH CAROLINA STATE EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION
Durham
September 7, 1963
The slogan, "Good Government Is a Habit in North Carolina,"
was true because of the day-in and day-out work of state em-
ployees, the Governor told a group of employees at their annual
convention. He said that a governor's job was temporary, but
the employees stayed on year after year, providing for a strong
continuity and for efficiency. Many helped to make good govern-
ment a habit in the state— the General Assembly members, the
Council of State, department heads and supervisors— but the
average state employee was the single most important individual
in upholding the tradition of good government. Sanford referred
to periodic complaints about the cost of government, but he said
it was impossible to go back to the days when every individual
built his own water line and took care of his own garbage. North
Carolina citizens could find no bargain greater than that of local
and state governmental services, which cost less than those in
forty-eight other states. The number of employees was lower than
any state in proportion to population. Government costs rose
with the rise in population, though the increase was not so great
as in other areas. The Governor, outlining the accomplishments
of the first two years of his administration, said that "all of these
services of State Government are there because the citizens . . .
want them, expect them, and need them." He expressed appre-
ciation to the employees, on behalf of their employer, for
efficient and economical government.
STATE-FEDERAL CONFERENCE ON
MENTAL RETARDATION
Warrenton, Virginia
September 19, 1963
[Governor Sanford addressed a White House-sponsored conference on
mental retardation which was held in Warrenton, Virginia. He outlined the
Public Addresses and Summaries
357
recent accomplishments made in North Carolina and expressed the hope
that further progress would result from interstate co-operation on the prob-
lems of prevention and cure of mental retardation. His participation in this
conference was characteristic of the Governor's vigorous campaign on behalf
of "forgotten children."]
Of all the inventions down through the centuries, of all the
discoveries since the time of Eden, of all of the miracles of nature,
there is none that approachs the magnificence, the intricacies, or
the potentials of the human mind.
I am happy to join with experts of psychology, social work,
medicine, and government in seeking ways to turn on lights and
to open doors for those whose mental capacities have, through
some quirk of heredity or environment, failed to develop fully.
It is an indictment of our society and the society of other
nations that while learning to open canned foods electrically, to
broadcast voices and pictures electronically, to manufacture cars
with automatic gears and power steering and power brakes and
without cranks, to dam the greatest of our rivers, to irrigate the
most arid of our lands, to travel safely under the polar cap, to
fire missiles across oceans and continents, and to reach toward
the stars themselves— that while doing all these things, we have
failed to find the solution to the problems of mental retardation.
But it is a significant and a happy commentary that the Presi-
dent and his advisers should take time from the awesome re-
sponsibilities of world peace and of the myriad problems of the
domestic scene to hold this conference and to seek ways to prevent
and cure mental retardation.
This is a problem that must be of concern to all Americans,
and it is a problem for which all of us must bear the blame if
the solutions are not found. It is not a problem solely of the
federal or the state or the local government. It is a problem of
humanity, and therefore, it is a problem for us all— those in
government and out, those at every level of government, those
in all hospitals and medical schools, those in all churches in all
regions.
The size of the problem of mental retardation is shocking. In
North Carolina alone we have some 140,000 persons who are
classified as mentally retarded. Until very recent years, the best
a person afflicted with mental retardation could hope for in my
state was custodial care. And much of that was of questionable
standards.
Most of us here today well remember some mentally retarded
boy who was locked away, fed like a vegetable, and treated like
an animal. Later on the boy might be turned loose long enough
358
Papers of Terry Sanford
to be sent to reform school. And still later, he might be sent to
prison. Fortunately, those days largely have passed, just as the
days when a mentally ill person was consigned to a "snake pit"
are gone.
In recent years. North Carolinians have labored hard to provide
better educational facilities for the great majority of the children
who might, for want of a better term, be called "average." We
have invested heavily to raise the standards of excellence of the
public schools of North Carolina and of the institutions of higher
learning of our state. The General Assemblies of North Carolina
have raised teachers' salaries by more than 25 per cent in the
last three years; they have cut the size of classes; they have
provided guidance counselors; they have provided for assistant
superintendents; they have provided for more adequate library
services; they have provided for more clerical assistants to free
the teachers for the fundamental duty of teaching; and they have
provided many other needs of the public schools.
The General Assembly, with the support of the people of the
state, has levied new taxes to improve the educational opportu-
nities of our boys and girls.
We also have attempted to provide more adequately for the
especially gifted children. We have done this through special
classes in the public schools and, with the support of the Carnegie
Foundation and North Carolina businessmen, through a special
summer school for the academically and the artistically gifted.
North Carolina's recent endeavors and its twentieth century
commitment to education were set down at the start of this cen-
tury by Governor Charles Brantley Aycock, who set the theme by
proclaiming that North Carolina would seek to give every child
the opportunity "to burgeon out the best that is within him."
To honor this twentieth century commitment to education, we
were obligated to provide education for the blind students. And
we did. We had to provide education for the deaf. And we have.
We also had to provide education for the mentally retarded. And
that we are trying to do. As we have built ladders for the minds
of the average and gifted children to climb, we finally have
remembered these forgotten children.
We knew that these North Carolinians, who cannot because of
intelligence limitations, learn, earn, produce, and live to the
same extent as the majority of their fellow human beings, needed
ladders also. We knew that the rungs on these ladders had to be
closer together and had to be fashioned in shapes and materials
different from the other educational ladders which we are build-
ing. We knew that these children needed the constant, guiding
Public Addresses and Summaries
359
hand of a teacher who had been carefully trained to develop to
the fullest the retarded capabilities.
To meet the awesome problem of mental retardation, the state
of North Carolina has mobilized its public agencies, and we have
sought to tie together the efforts of these agencies and other
groups and organizations.
Early in 1962, we established the Governor's Commission for
the Mentally Retarded, composed of outstanding lay and profes-
sional leaders from across the state. This commission was charged
with the obligation of making a thorough study of the problem
and of coming up with recommendations on ways to meet that
problem. From this study commission came the idea, enacted by
the 1963 General Assembly, of a continuing Advisory Council on
Mental Retardation, financed by the state.
Other agencies of government which are directly involved in
working with the mentally retarded include the State Mental
Health Department, which is a redefinition of our mental hospital
system as established by our 1963 General Assembly; the State
Department of Public Health; the public schools; and the state
and local departments of welfare; the Prison, Probation, Parole,
and Correction departments.
Services for the mentally retarded might be placed in eight
major categories.
The first is maternal, preventive, and diagnostic services, which
are largely public health in nature. The chief problem, of the
entire question of mental retardation and the greatest hope for
solving the problem, is prevention.
There has been gradual progress for many years in the various
preventive, diagnostic, and treatment services offered by our
public health department as well as private practitioners. Four
part-time child development clinics staffed by pediatricians, psy-
chologists, social workers, and nurses have been developed in
recent years in widely separated areas of the state. Three com-
prehensive full-time clinics for the retarded have been established
in the past two years. One of these is in a state residential center
for the retarded and the other two are at university medical cen-
ters under public health department support. Our legislature
has appropriated |354,000 to be additional full-time develop-
mental evaluation clinics during the coming biennium. A fourth
clinic at the new western residential institution will begin
functioning early next year. These clinics also carry out a major
teaching function for various professionals working with retard-
ates.
Five speech and hearing centers have been developed under
the auspices of our Public Health Department during the past
360
Papers of Terry San ford
seven years. Crippled children's orthopedic and other diagnostic
and treatment programs continue gradual expansion. The
mentally retarded are fully eligible for these programs and form
a substantial fraction of the patients served. Public health nurses
have become increasingly interested and involved in helping and
teaching parents to care more satisfactorily for their retarded
children in their own homes. The Public Health Department also
has placed major emphasis on the development of programs for
improved care of premature infants. Evidence is growing that
more adequate prenatal care and improved care of prematurely
born infants will prevent or reduce resultant mental retardation
in many cases. Seven primary centers for premature care have
been developed. These centers have assisted development of
training programs, particularly in improved nursing care, for
other hospitals.
Along with treating the mentally retarded child, we need to
provide parents with the knowledge to care for the retarded.
Such counseling is now available to a limited extent in our
comprehensive clinics, at the residential centers and from public
welfare workers. It is our hope that the incorporation of com-
munity mental health clinics and centers under the Department
of Mental Health will greatly increase the counseling available to
parents of the retarded.
In order to provide the greatest possible training for mentally
retarded children who are above the custodial level, we have
increased the number of special classes that are operated within
the public schools. Classes for the retarded have been increased
from 150 during the school year of 1957-1958 to 553 during the
current school year. We plan to raise that number to 663 for the
school year of 1964-1965. If we can continue this rate of growth,
special education classes will be available to all of North Caro-
lina's educable and trainable children by 1968.
Some developments in the educational sphere planned for the
immediate future are as follow: Early this summer, our legislature
appropriated $241,000 for the coming biennium to establish a
training program for public school teachers for the retarded at
the State University of North Carolina. In addition, $100,000
was appropriated to establish a scholarship program to support
these special education teachers during their training. Ninety
thousand dollars was appropriated to the State Board of Educa-
tion for the employment of a curriculum specialist in mental
retardation, for the development of a curriculum library and to
provide an adequate supply of appropriate textbooks for the
retarded in our public schools.
Now we in the state administration and the members of the
Public Addresses and Summaries
361
North Carolina General Assembly recognize that it is in the
self-interest of the average citizen and of the above-average
citizen to provide education and training for retarded citizens.
We know of the 1,578 retarded persons in the United States
in 1958 who completed training under the Vocational Rehabili-
tation Program. Before rehabilitation, their total annual earn-
ings were $70,000. This means that each of these people was
averaging $34.36 a year— just about enough to feed and to clothe
and to house them for one week a year. We know that the other
fifty-one weeks of the year they had to be supported by their
families, their churches, and the taxpayers. After these 1,578
persons had completed the Vocational Rehabilitation Program,
their earnings jumped to $2.5 million, or $1,584 per person per
year.
In order to provide greater vocational opportunities, the 1963
General Assembly appropriated approximately $500,000.
At present there are three facilities for the vocational training
of the mentally retarded in North Carolina: a young, small
program in our largest city, Charlotte; a thriving Good Will
Industries day program in Winston-Salem, which includes train-
ing and sheltered workshop facilities for a limited number of
mental retardates; and a large, vocational training unit operated
at our eastern institution for the retarded. The number of
mentally retarded adults successfully trained by our public
rehabilitation facilities and placed in productive community
employment has grown from seven in 1959 to ninety-three in
1962. Our legislature appropriated a total of $222,000 for this
biennium to plan and construct two additional vocational re-
habilitation centers for trainable and educable retarded persons.
We have made progress but, obviously, we have a long way to go.
We need "half-way houses" for the mentally retarded. We
plan to set up four such centers during the coming biennium
and to employ additional rehabilitation counselors for work
with retarded people in the communities. We are seeking through
this program to provide for vocational training nearer the homes
of the mentally retarded with consequent savings to the families
of the retarded, and to the state.
In addition, $230,000 was appropriated to begin operation of
two vocational rehabilitation programs in local residential insti-
tutions, to create four half-way community houses, and make
possible the employment of additional rehabilitation counselors
for retardates in the community. When added to matching federal
funds, more than $1.1 million will be utilized in this biennium
for new vocational resources for North Carolina's retardates.
Ten years ago North Carolina had a single residential insti-
362
Papers of Terry Sanford
tution for the retarded with a budget of $1.7 million per year
and a bed capacity of 1,850. Five years ago, two additional
residential institutions were in operation. The bed capacity had
been doubled and appropriations had been tripled— to $4.5
million a year.
In the current fiscal year, our institutional appropriations have
risen to $9.4 million. Later this year, a new 600-bed residential
center for the retarded will begin receiving patients. A 100-bed
facility for blind retardates will be under construction in the near
future.
It is impossible in a brief speech to translate progress into
detailed and human terms, but we are convinced that real
progress has occurred in our residential programs. I will only
mention four areas where marked progress has occurred:
1. Preadmission and diagnostic services.
2. Recreation and vocational training programs.
3. Medical care.
4. Habilitation and physical therapy programs for the severely
handicapped.
A sum of $390,000 was provided for the next fiscal year for
the planning and construction of an in-patient facility for the
diagnosis and short-term treatment of mentally retarded and
emotionally disturbed children at the state university medical
center in Chapel Hill. One primary purpose of this facility is
the training of medical students and residents in the diagnosis
and treatment of these conditions. A sum of $156,000 was ap-
propriated to Murdoch Center for the purpose of expanding
programs of training personnel to work more effectively with
the mentally retarded in both institutional and community pro-
grams. A substantial beginning on such liaison and educational
endeavor already has been made by our state centers.
Research is one of the overriding needs in this fight against
mental retardation. This is the area of most rapid expansion
among all of our programs for the retarded. Our developmental
evaluation clinics have important research projects under way.
New major research programs in hereditary, metabolic, and
other causes of mental retardation are under way at two of our
university medical centers and at one state residential center.
Active continuing research by university sociologists is con-
tinuing at two of our residential centers. The Psychology Depart-
ment at the University of North Carolina has undertaken
responsibility for program development in psychology at the
nearby residential center at Butner. This is a unique and exciting
venture. Basic research on learning and retardation is being
carried out as part of this program.
Public Addresses and Summaries
363
Programs of the county departments of public welfare have
a very important part to play in North Carolina's services for
the mentally retarded and their families. These overlap many
of the headings previously mentioned, particularly diagnostic
and treatment services.
The State Department of Public Welfare played a pivotal role
in co-operative committee planning for licensure and super-
vision of private facilities for retarded children that began two
and one-half years ago.
The Welfare Department now licenses eleven private facilities
with a total of 191 beds for the retarded. Many of these are
for severely retarded infants and young children. There has
been steady gradual progress in child welfare and other casework
services in most of North Carolina's 100 counties. An important
fraction of these services are to the retarded and their families.
North Carolina has pioneered in homemaker services. This
program began in three counties in 1947 and has spread to
twenty counties with over fifty homemakers in 1962. A number
of other counties are planning to initiate this program during
this biennium. Homemaker services have often enabled families
with retarded children to remain together during serious illnesses
of one of the parents. They have helped families with retarded
members in many other ways. The need for such services far
outstrips available resources but, as in other areas, progress is
being made.
More than 4,300 examinations by psychologists employed by
the Department of Public Welfare were carried out in North
Carolina last year; 82 per cent were carried out on children.
This represents a 50 per cent increase in the past five years.
Approximately half of these examinations were carried out on
patients suspected of mental retardation. The largest share was
seen for educational planning, the next largest because of
behavior problems, and a significant number for consideration of
placement in a state residential center.
The last session of the North Carolina General Assembly
passed sweeping revisions of our statutes dealing with the
mentally retarded and passed a number of constructive new
laws to initiate, expand, and improve programs. I have mentioned
most of these developments. Procedures for admission to state
residential facilities were greatly simplified and the requirement
for commitment was removed. A unified State Department of
Mental Health was created with responsibility for mental hos-
pitals, community mental health programs, and residential
centers for the retarded. The Commissioner of Mental Health
was provided deputy directors over each of these three divisions.
364
Papers of Terry Sanford
Graphic evidence of the hopeful and positive attitude of the
North Carolina General Assembly toward the mentally retarded
is the statute entitled "Objects and Aims of Centers for Mentally
Retarded."
The residential centers shall have the following general aims and objects:
(1) To provide facilities and programs for those who cannot be contained
in the community because of medical or psychosocial reasons;
(2) provide conditions which allow those admitted full development—
emotionally, physically, and intellectually;
(3) provide medical care, educational opportunities, training in social
and occupational skills, and opportunities for freedom and happiness to
minimize the effects of the mental handicap;
(4) maintain facilities for evaluation and diagnosis, for cooperating with
other agencies in instructing the public in the care of the mentally handi-
capped at home, and for aftercare of discharged residents from the centers;
(5) develop a therapeutic residential program that will be coordinated
with an over-all state program;
(6) disseminate knowledge concerning the causation, prevention, nature
and treatment of the mentally handicapped;
(7) engage in training and research in the field of the mentally handi-
capped;
(8) cooperate with all agencies— federal, state, or local in the further
attainment of these objects.
Recognizing that states can help one another in meeting this
problem, North Carolina and other southern states joined in a
"Commitment to Health" at a meeting of the Southern Regional
Education Board held in conjunction with the National Gover-
nors Conference this summer. We adopted a program for inter-
state co-operation between the states running from Delaware to
Oklahoma to Texas on the problems of mental illness and mental
retardation.
That commitment assumed by the southern states promises "to
push back the curtain of ignorance which cloaks the causes of
these disorders ... to give us the energy to apply this information
aggressively in programs for prevention of disorders and for
strengthening the health-building resources of our society."
As we know, the most retarded aspect of the problem of mental
retardation is not the people who suffer from it. We who have
let this problem slide because it was so awesome are the ones
who are most guilty of retardation. It would be my hope that
this conference would be the first of many at developing the
tools, the knowledge, and the desire to overcome this problem.
Public Addresses and Summaries
365
SOUTHEASTERN REGIONAL CONFERENCE OF
THE AMERICAN PUBLIC WELFARE ASSOCIATION
ASHEVILLE
September 25, 1963
Governor Sanford, speaking on the subject of welfare, referred
to the Constitution's preamble which gave as one purpose of
government the promotion of the general welfare. He said the
term "general welfare" was broader than the North Carolina
Department of Public Welfare, that it meant concern at all levels
of government for the lives and well-being of all citizens. In its
broad definition, the term could include education, rehabilitation
of citizens needing such service, co-operation in the drive for
industry, conservation of natural resources. The welfare depart-
ments were asked to co-ordinate various activities for people they
served. Sanford continued by saying that the North Carolina Fund
was a program endeavoring to break the cycle of poverty by proper
training of children so that they would not become parents of
poverty. The state's official toast called North Carolina a land
"where the weak grow strong and the strong grow great"; Gov-
ernor Sanford concluded by saying "that the strong grow greatest
by helping to lift up the weak."
SOCIETY OF AMERICAN ARCHIVISTS AND AMERICAN
ASSOCIATION FOR STATE AND LOCAL HISTORY
Raleigh
October 3, 1963
Addressing a joint meeting of the Society of American Ar-
chivists and the American Association for State and Local History,
Governor Sanford commented on North Carolina's contribution
to the archival profession. He mentioned the Tar Heels who had
served as founders and leaders of the society. After welcoming
the group to Raleigh, to help observe the three hundredth anni-
versary of the Charter of 1663, Sanford traced briefly the develop-
ment of the State Department of Archives and History from the
time of its beginning in 1903 as the North Carolina Historical
Commission. He paid tribute to R. D. W. Connor, a pioneer in
state archival pursuits who served as the first Archivist of the
United States. Sanford called the new Archives and History-
State Library building "North Carolina's birthday present to her
366
Papers of Terry San ford
own people." He observed that North Carolinians liked to study
the past and preserve the best of it without worshiping it and
that North Carolina was determined to move forward. The past
would serve as a chart to the future.
LEGISLATIVE WORK CONFERENCE OF
NEW ENGLAND BOARD OF HIGHER EDUCATION
Portsmouth, New Hampshire
October 8, 1963
Governor Sanford compared New England to the South in
his opening remarks, saying that the rising fortune of education
in the New England area could be seen in the organization of a
regional Board of Higher Education. Though New England
was more fortunate than the South in its abundance of educational
resources, certain benefits w^ould accrue to both areas. The Gov-
ernor suggested that the South was a pioneer when it pooled its
educational resources on a regional basis by bringing together
governors, legislators, and educators in the establishment of the
Southern Regional Education Board. The theme of this con-
ference was "Education and Economic Development." Sanford
commented on the slow recovery of the South from the Civil
War as compared with the rapid reconstruction of western Europe
after World War II. He speculated on changes which might have
been brought about had the southerners had more of their
number educated. The close ties between economics and edu-
cation Tvere obvious. Through the SREB the South expressed
its major educational goals: to give full educational opportunity
to all people; to build southern institutions of national renown*
to promote education which would produce a fine quality of
public service and citizenship. Realizing fully that the South
did not meet the national quality in education, the SREB took
positive steps to strengthen the position of the region. As a
result, the South was doing more planning for future needs than
any other area. Sanford concluded with the opinion that the out-
look, for the South and for New England, was optimistic so long
as there were conferences such as this one.
Public Addresses and Summaries
367
RALEIGH HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION
Raleigh
October 9, 1963
Speaking in Raleigh, the Governor referred to the many
changes which had taken place in the city during the past few
years. Construction of new homes in new developments had
changed the landscape in a short span of time. Sanford reminded
the builders and realtors that they tried to sell a young couple
a three-bedroom house, that the extra rooms were soon filled with
two boys and two girls, that the children were soon grown and
buying homes of their own. Thus the need for new homes con-
tinued to increase. Sanford said that the relationship between
business and government was sometimes pictured as one of con-
flict, but that the spirit of co-operativeness prevailed as a matter
of fact, and free government and free enterprise together accom-
plished much. At the local level, water and sewer systems, streets,
zoning ordinances, fire and police protection were all beneficial.
Counties provided school buildings. The state government helped
provide teachers, highways, and numerous services to the people.
The cost to the citizen for all of these services led to a discussion
of the state's low-cost operation and its top financial rating.
Though the costs in the federal government were high, the
provision of armed forces, postal service, farm programs, and
numerous other services made for an expanding economy. The
Governor showed specifically ways in which various groups bene-
fited builders. He mentioned the rise in the cost of government,
but he added that the cost of building was also rising. Parallel
with increased costs was the fact that the quality of building and
the quality of services also rose. Though the government was
always subject to criticism, Sanford urged that there be "con-
structive, not distorted" criticism. He said government was not
the enemy of free enterprise; evidence of this could be seen every
time a foundation was poured. The chief executive praised the
builders for their help in building a better Raleigh, a better
North Carolina, a better America.
TWENTIETH ANNUAL TEACHERS INSTITUTE
Raleigh
October 10, 1963
Governor Sanford expressed pleasure at the opportunity of
discussing education with the teachers of the Roman Catholic
368
Papers of Terry Sanford
schools of North Carolina. The state had, he said, long appreciated
the partnership between the state and the churches in the cause
for education. Approximately 40 per cent of all North Carolina
college students were enrolled in church-related colleges. The
education of 13,000 children by the Catholics was equivalent to
$3.5 million yearly in state funds. The Governor added that the
state would continue to rely heavily on church-related schools
and colleges to assist in youth education. Regardless of the
number involved in education, the bulk of work continued to
be with teacher and pupil. Sanford described the teacher as "the
number-one leader in molding our citizens." The need for edu-
cation increased in direct proportion as the day of the unskilled
worker and the undereducated man waned. Teachers had the
responsibility of educating boys and girls, of building a better
nation and a better world. In closing Sanford summed up his
personal attitude with these words:
"As a Methodist, I commend you for your devotion.
"As a public official, I thank you for the job you are doing.
"As a parent, I wish you godspeed."
MARYLAND STATE TEACHERS ASSOCIATION
Baltimore^ Maryland
October 17, 1963
[This address to teachers in Maryland was a strong indictment of the
failure of Americans to provide the education which was essential for
children growing up in the modern world. He called on those in his audi-
ence to measure, and where lacks were found, to fill the gap. He concluded
that "the success of the classroom will determine the success, and even the
survival of this America of ours."]
Last week end the road to free Berlin was blockaded, and we
were ready to fight if necessary in order to keep it open. In the
world scheme of things it is obvious that access to Berlin is vital
to the free world. But access to the highest quality of education,
less obvious to many people, is far more important to the free
world.
In the defense of freedom, education is the ultimate weapon.
In the reach for the stars, education provides the greatest power
of thrust, and in the effort to increase our gross national product,
to give every person a better chance to make a better living and
to enjoy a better life, education is the index of our success or
of our failure.
Public Addresses and Summaries
369
The results of the tests you give in your classrooms are more
vital to the defense of democracy than the tests of weapons at the
Aberdeen Proving Grounds. And what the economy of our nation
will be in 1980 will be better judged by the report cards from
the public schools of America than by the Dow-Jones average
from Wall Street.
For most of our lives it has been necessary for us to be con-
cerned with the threats against our free government and against
our ideals of human worth— threats both from without and with-
in. But I would argue that the troops stationed along the 38th
Parallel in Korea and those stationed along the Iron Curtain in
Europe and those stationed in Viet Nam are no more important
in stopping Communism than the teachers stationed in the class-
rooms.
And I would contend that the greatest force for subversion in
this land of ours is not the extremists of the far left or the
extremists of the far right. The greatest force for subversion of
our democratic ideals and our human aspirations is ignorance,
resulting from dropouts, from those who stayed in but got only
shoddy schooling, from the failure of the schools to find a way to
encourage every child to make the most of his talents.
In this year of 1963, the most pressing domestic conflict in
America has been the conflict over civil rights. I would not
minimize the aspirations of anyone by saying that the greatest
violation of civil rights is not the denial of the ballot. Nor is it
the denial of the right to eat in a restaurant nor to see a movie
nor to spend the night at a hotel. The greatest infringement on
civil rights is the denial of the best educational opportunities a
rich nation can provide for the boys and girls of America.
White and Negro children alike have been the victims of this
denial. Children in farm areas and children in towns and cities
have suffered. This infringement is true not only in southern
states, but it is true also in the states of New England, the Middle
Atlantic, the Midwest, and the Far West.
For too long, the citizens of America have given too little
support to the public schools— and this goes for the wealthy states
as well as for the poor. We have hesitated in erecting new and
modem schools— even as we have added second and third baths
to our homes, put down patios in our backyards, installed auto-
matic dishwashers, automatic washing machines, automatic stoves,
automatic disposals, and the myriad of other appliances that
accompany our new homes.
Along our streets and roads, we run into frustrating traffic jams.
But the worst those traffic jams can do is to make us late to work
370
Papers of Terry Sanford
or late to supper. The traffic jams in our overcrowded classrooms
will make us, as a nation, late in history.
For too long we have felt ourselves able to afford new auto-
mobiles but have been miserly in our appropriations for new
school equipment. For too long we have put teachers' salaries
too low on the totem pole. As a result we have not attracted
enough of the bright young men and women to the teaching
profession. And in most places we have not paid them enough
to hold these good teachers once they go into the classrooms.
There is no excuse for such short-sighted public policy.
It is my firm belief that a nation that can afford to send ships
under the polar ice, a nation that can afford to grasp for the
moon and the stars themselves, and a nation that can enjoy the
standard of living that we in America enjoy today can also afford
to provide the educational faculties and facilities that the children
of this modern age need.
There are direct correlations between the educational attain-
ments of people and the crime rate. There is a direct correlation
between the earnings of a man and the number of years he spent
in school— and what he learned during those years in school. There
is a direct correlation in the investment people make in education
and the over-all welfare of their community, state, and nation.
There certainly is a correlation between education and human
tolerance. There is a direct correlation between education and
the economy. What a change in our nation a significant increase
in the support of education could make.
We can see the great need for education in the farm field as
we watch one tractor plowing in a single day the acreage that
used to require half a dozen men and six mules to do in two
days. We can see the need for education in the industrial plant
as great automatic machinery does the labor that used to require
hundreds of workers. We can see the need for education when
we drive along the new highways of our nation as we watch a
single steam shovel move more dirt in one swoop than a hundred
men with shovels once did.
We know that the day of the unskilled worker and the under-
educated man is fast waning. At the same time, we know that
the need for technically skilled and highly educated men and
women is growing rapidly. We know that in Raleigh, North
Carolina, and that in Baltimore, Maryland, there are men and
women on the unemployment rolls; at the same time jobs for
highly trained and highly educated men and women go begging.
We certainly can see the need for education in the under-
developed areas of North Carolina, and I suspect you can see the
Public Addresses and Summaries
371
need for education in some under-developed areas of Maryland.
We can see the terrible need for education in the prisons of our
states where you can go by cell after cell of men who drifted to
crime because they did not have skills or education needed for
employment. We can see all too painfully the need for education
in the underprivileged homes and neighborhoods of Baltimore
and Raleigh and of every other city in this nation of ours.
You have a job as a teacher to teach, and this is the fundamental
part of all this business of education. But there is more. It is your
job as teachers to help inspire the support of the communities and
the states and the nation to education. It is your job as teachers
to provide the type of instruction which will interest boys and
girls enough so that they will remain in school rather than drop-
ping out of school and missing out on their best chance in life.
It is your responsibility to teach in a way that you will be under-
stood rather than to teach in a way that you may be understood.
As a parent, I recognize the competition that you face in your
important task of imparting instruction. I realize that the teacher
cannot be as entertaining to teen-agers as Elvis Presley or Sandra
Dee. I realize that an elementary teacher cannot easily be as
amusing to youngsters as Andy Griffith. And I realize that there
is no packed stadium of fans to cheer the teacher as she breaks
through a wall of ignorance as there is when a football player
goes through the wall of the defense for a touchdown.
But certainly your classes in science and current events can be
fascinating. Surely the voyage of submarines under the polar cap
can be exciting. And surely the stories like those of Calvert and
Francis Scott Key can be inspiring.
What kind of education do we need to provide in this ever
changing and increasingly complex society of ours? Generally, we
need a greatly strengthened public school system. We need a
public school system with special attention for the gifted and with
special consideration for the ''slow" learners. And we need a
public school system designed to bring out the best from that
great majority of students whom we call average.
We need teachers who will hold out their hands of understand-
ing to the slow and who will raise high the goals for the bright.
We need a school system concerned with all hopes, all needs, all
abilities. We need support from the public, financial and moral,
in a degree far beyond anything we have ever known.
Where is America's heart? Is it her army and navy, her indus-
trial might, her space ships in paths to the moon? Is it her wealth,
her forests and streams, her minerals in the ground? Is it her broad
372
Papers of Terry Sanford
prairies, her rich farmlands, her great cities? Or, is it the intel-
ligence, the energy, the creativeness of her people?
These things make up the muscle, the sinews, the bone, but
the heart that continually pumps new life, keeping these things
useful and active, is the classroom. The classroom determines the
strength of the armed forces, the success of the space conquest,
the output of the industrial establishment. The classroom deter-
mines the accumulation of the wealth, the beneficial use of the
water and trees, the value of the minerals in the ground. The
prairies, the farmlands, the cities would perish without the
nourishment of the classroom. The classroom unleashes the human
resources.
Indeed all of our hopes, all of our achievements, all of our
endeavors depend on education. If we are to seek effective en-
deavor, ^ve must start ^vith effective education. If we are to seek
quality in American life we must start with quality in our educa-
tion. If we are to know excellence in our undertakings, it can
spring only from excellence in education.
This nation must understand that the first national purpose
must be education. What else should stand ahead? Nothing. For
all other purposes find their fulfillment through education.
To our detriment, this nation does not understand that the
first national purpose is education. In our communities we do not
recognize and appreciate properly the teaching profession. We
border on stinginess in our financial support. We indulge a drop-
out rate of disgraceful proportion.
We disregard too many individual needs. Curriculums are
standardized at mediocrity, leaving too many young people un-
challenged, untrained, and unproductive. We do not seek out
vigorously enough the excellent minds. We do not begin to dis-
cover all the talent.
The space gap ^vas nothing compared with the education gap.
In the space gap, we measured our achievement against our guess
of the achievements of our adversary. In the education gap, we
measure what we have done against what we might have done.
We measure ^vhat we are against what we might have been. We
measure what we are to be against what we ought to be. It is
time to measure. And having measured, it is time to fill the gap.
What goes on in the classroom between the teacher and the stu-
dent is the criterion by which we must judge our educational
system. And the success of the classroom will determine the
success, and even the survival, of this America of ours.
It is time to put education first.
Public Addresses and Summaries
373
QUARTERLY CONFERENCE OF
THE BOARD OF CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT
Asheville
October 22, 1963
Addressing the quarterly conference of the Board of Conser-
vation and Development, the Governor discussed the food process-
ing industry. He mentioned the Food Industries Section of the
Division of Commerce and Industry and the Department of Food
Science at North Carolina State as steps in the direction of
encouraging food processing. He said plans were made to promote
the location of branch plants by out-of-state firms and to encour-
age established firms to expand, initiate new food processing
operations, help introduce new products and processes, and
co-ordinate production programs for various commodities. New
interest had been shown in utilizing basic crops for various '
products, and North Carolina was in the forefront in the field of
food preservation. Sanford said the stage was set for North
Carolina to build plants and process foods in the same way that
she built textile mills to process cotton and tobacco factories to
process tobacco and furniture plants to process forest products.
NORTH CAROLINA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS
Asheville
October 24, 1963
[Approximately 500 realtors and their wives heard Governor Sanford
applaud the real estate industry as "an old and honorable profession," and
he used the occasion to defend the oft-criticized partnership between gov-
ernment and free enterprise. This address was one of some sixty business
and recreational features which were crowded into the three-day convention,]
I am happy for this opportunity to meet with the realtors of
North Carolina. In traveling across our state and in seeing the
thousands upon thousands of new homes going up, I know that
yours is one of the fastest growing businesses in North Carolina.
I was interested, and I know that you were interested, in the
latest figures on building permits in North Carolina: $22.6 mil-
lion of building permits— of which residential permits constituted
an important portion— were issued in the thirty-six largest
cities of this state in September alone. This was a gain of 3.4
per cent over the building permits issued for the same cities in
the same month in 1962. And similar growth figures hold true
374
Papers of Terry Sanford
for all the cities and towns in the state as a whole. The growth
in the real estate industry is indicative of the growth of business
generally in North Carolina.
We have reached an all time high in employment: More than
1,300,000 persons are now gainfully employed in nonfarm jobs in
North Carolina. New and expanding industry continues to build
new plants and to provide more jobs in our state. The economy
of our state, judged by every major index, is continuing a solid
and steady growth.
The real estate industry is a vital part of this over-all economy.
As any husband who has gone through the experience knows,
when you close the papers on a new home, you are not just buying
a house. The wife must have new furniture, and this means more
sales for the furniture manufacturers of our state. The wife
also is quick to advise the husband that she must have new
mattresses, new sheets, new pillowcases, and new bedspreads for
the new beds, and new drapes for the new windows. This means
more sales for the department stores and more sales for the
textile industry of our state. The husband quickly learns that
new drapes require new rugs and ne^v rugs require new lamps
and new lamps require new tables on which to set the new lamps.
Of course, if the new home owner buys one of the houses that
you realtors are developing in the suburbs, the wife often
prevails on the husband for a second car. This not only means
additional business for the car dealer, but it also means twice as
much business for the fender repairman.
The new house which you sell means more business for the
hardware merchant because the husband quickly finds that the
wife has a multitude of jobs requiring hammers, saws, hatchets,
pliers, and a multitude of other tools for the inside, and a
regular supply room of tools for the yard and the garden. Un-
fortunately for the husband, one of the major purchases that he
has to make is a lawnmower.
So you realtors are not only a major industry yourself, but you
are a generator of business for many other industries.
Yours is an old and honorable profession.
Perhaps you have heard the story of the three men who were
arguing over who belonged to the oldest profession in the world.
There was a realtor, an architect, and a lawyer.
The realtor argued: "Now you know in the beginning they
didn't have any homes in which to live and it had to be realtors
who had those homes built and who sold those homes."
But the architect said: "Well, who do you think drew the
blueprint for those houses if it weren't an architect? The architect
had to create a design from all of that chaos."
Public Addresses and Summaries
375
But the lawyer had the last word: "Well, now who do you think
was responsible for all of that chaos?"
From time to time, some critics of government try to portray
the relationship between business and government as one of
mortal conflict. These people paint government as a dangerous
enemy to the hard-working businessman. Now this sort of criti-
cism has been going on ever since our forefathers gained inde-
pendence. And that's all right. A democracy thrives on criticism.
There has never been an age in our nation's history when some
unhappy soul wasn't predicting the demise of our democracy
because of activities of government.
In this century, critics of government repeatedly have sounded
the alarm. For years they have called up the ghosts of early
patriots like Thomas Jefferson as an indictment against the present
government. Of course, what these critics conveniently overlook
is the big government act by Mr. Jefferson at the time of the
Louisiana Purchase— the biggest real estate deal ever closed in
America. What these critics also forget is the fact that during
the twenties we had in this country the sleepy government that
they seem to admire so much. And you and I both know what
happened at the end of that decade. Some of you here this after-
noon will remember how sorry the real estate market was in 1930.
You remember the foreclosures. You remember that there weren't
many new houses started in 1930 or 1931 or 1932. None of us
want to return to "good old days" like those.
Now let's look and see just how free government and free
enterprise work together. I believe that as realtors, you gentlemen
will be among the first to recognize the importance of the co-
operative partnership between private industry and government.
At the local level, municipal government provides the water
and sewer systems, the streets, the zoning ordinances which protect
both the home builder and the home buyer. The municipal gov-
ernment provides police and fire protection. County government
provides such vital services as school buildings. State government
helps provide the teachers for those schools and the highways that
serve an ever growing population, to mention just two of the
thousand or so services of state government.
What is the cost of these state and local government services
to you and to the other citizens of North Carolina? North Caro-
lina ranks next to bottom in the nation in the cost of state and
local government services. The number of governmental em-
ployees is in the bottom five in the nation. Our state govern-
ment credit rating on Wall Street is the highest in the nation-
Triple A.
A dramatic example of what the big investment brokers think
376
Papers of Terry San ford
of the way government has been conducted in North Carolina
during the twentieth century was offered a few weeks ago. North
Carolina sold more than |21 million in state bonds at an interest
rate of 2.8 per cent. Wouldn't we build some houses if we could
borrow money that cheaply!
Now what about that federal government in Washington? It
is costly— although it won't be quite so much so if the Senate
approves the President's tax-cut bill. By far, the largest single
expense of the federal government is the armed forces. But
what do you suppose would happen to real estate values if
we didn't have those armed forces?
The postal service is costly. But I don't know of any realtor or
home owner who wants it discontinued.
The farm programs are supported by tax funds. But I don't
have to tell an audience of businessmen in North Carolina what
would happen to the balance sheets of the merchants, the bankers,
and the builders in the city if we let the farm economy of this
state and nation go to seed like we did in the twenties.
Some critics of government approve these fundamental services.
But, they hasten to add, government has started meddling in too
many things that are none of its business. There were critics
saying the same thing about Teddy Roosevelt's conservation pro-
grams. But aren't we glad we still have an adequate supply of tim-
ber when we start to build houses?
Similarly, critics used to say government had no business inter-
ferring with the money market. In fact, critics of big government
were certain that Andrew Jackson was turning this nation into
a despotism in the 1830's when he decided that the federal govern-
ment rather than a private corporation should control the cur-
rency.
And on that black day in 1929, some of these proponents of
sleepy government were having second thoughts about the need
for government regulation of the stock market.
I don't believe anyone here today feels that housing has been
socialized because of the FHA and GI home loan programs.
On the contrary. Those programs have acted as a catalyst to the
private housing industry, to the finance industry, and to industry
generally.
But I know that you realtors recognize these facts.
The cost of government, like the cost of houses, has gone up.
You have increased the quality and quantity of appliances in
homes. The services of government have increased with a growing
population.
The day should never come when government and government
Public Addresses and Summaries
377
officials are not criticized by the citizens. Judging by some of the
"letters to the editor," I see no danger of such a day.
But let the criticism be constructive, not distorted. Those who
attempt to portray government in this nation as an enemy of free
enterprise and as an oppressor of the people are doing a disservice
to free enterprise and to free government.
I know you realtors are not buying any of it. You show your
contempt for those cries of creeping socialism every time you list
a piece of property. Every time you sell a house, you disprove the
mournful warnings that our economy is weak.
You are helping to build a better North Carolina and a better
America. And I am happy to have had this opportunity of meeting
with you.
DEDICATION OF SATELLITE TRACKING
AND DATA ACQUISITION FACILITY
ROSMAN
October 26, 1963
The space station at Rosman "was put here because the sur-
rounding mountains shield it from electronic interference, so we
can't claim much credit for getting it," Governor Sanford told
the audience present at the dedication of the facility. It repre-
sented an opportunity, however, for the citizens of western
North Carolina. The station, with its sixty-five scientists and
technicians, would be an asset to the community. With high
standards of education and the type of communities sought by
scientific industries, western North Carolina could serve the indus-
trial Piedmont and Tennessee Valley with scientific and technical
know-how. The space program brought with it great potential for
whole new industries, but the Governor predicted that North
Carolina would not derive maximum benefits if the state did not
remain alert. He reminded the audience that the Tar Heel state
wanted to be a full partner and was preparing for this goal by
emphasizing quality education, by its legislative blueprint for
growth of higher education, and by the creation of the North
Carolina Board of Science and Technology to work toward intro-
ducing scientific knowledge into the state. Sanford expressed confi-
dence that North Carolina could be a leader in the scientific
development.
378
Papers of Terry Sanford
DEDICATION OF KERR SCOTT DORMITORY
EAST CAROLINA COLLEGE
Greenville
November 3, 1963
Governor Sanford compared East Carolina College, which had
created for itself an unchallenged role of leadership in the field of
higher education, with Kerr Scott, who worked for the advance-
ment of rural North Carolina. He discussed briefly the growth
and accomplishments of the school, saying that the influence of
East Carolina could not be measured in tangible terms and that
the potential of the state would not be achieved in eastern North
Carolina without this institution. He called Scott a leader who
helped pave the way for the work done at East Carolina. Scott,
a far-sighted thinker, believed that every boy and girl had a God-
given dignity of individual worth. Sanford commended a study
of the life and work of Kerr Scott to those who would live in the
dormitory named for him. "If you plow into your studies like
Kerr Scott plowed into the soil and the soul of North Carolina,"
Governor Sanford said in conclusion, "our state will reap a rich
harvest."
STATE PRINCIPALS CONFERENCE
Greensboro
November 7, 1963
Governor Sanford told North Carolina principals that the state
had made a beginning, "but only a beginning." He said that the
citizens were more aware than ever of education and its mean-
ing, but that they were looking to the principals for leadership.
He defined principal as "chief or main, highest in rank, the
principal teacher, the main teacher." After asking how those in
attendance filled the role of principal, the Governor stressed the
importance of creative and instructional leadership. He discussed
the problem of dropouts at some length, calling attention to the
necessity of adjusting the school program to fit the needs of each
individual and reviewing ways in which the dropout problem
could be studied. "Vision, boldness of action, and even a radical
departure might be called for," and the Governor continued by
suggesting that obstacles could be overcome. Knowledge being
power, Sanford reminded this group of educators that their
Because of his admiration and close association with Governor W. Kerr Scott,
it was fitting that the Governor present the address at the dedication of the Kerr
Scott Dormitory at East Carolina College in Greenville on November 3, 1963.
Public Addresses and Summaries
379
"knowledge of educational problems, strengths and weaknesses"
empowered them to act, and he closed with an expression of
confidence in the principals of North Carolina schools.
[At the conclusion of the speech, Baxter R. Ridenhour, presi-
dent of the State Division of Principals, presented the Governor
with a diamond-centered gold pin in the shape of North Carolina,
saying that "We feel that for the past three years we've had a
diamond in Raleigh."]
OHIO ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS,
OHIO SCHOOL BUSINESS OFFICIALS, AND THE
OHIO SCHOOL BOARDS ASSOCIATION
Columbus, Ohio
November 12, 1963
Sanford observed that children ask many questions, some of
them hard to answer, but the real answer to the "whys" of this,
that, and the other was education. Educated minds made planes
fly, transmitted sound and pictures thousands of miles, and per-
formed other wonders of everyday living. The theme for the
conference, "Economic Growth through Quality Education," was
appropriate, and Sanford said this theme was "not just a catch-
phrase . . . [but] a fact of life." He proceeded to discuss the idea
that education was basic to economy as he traced the historical
development of the North Carolina educational system. He
stressed the contribution made by Governor Aycock, who prom-
ised every child "the equal right to burgeon out all that there
is within him." He ended his sketch with a summary of 1961 and
1963 legislative accomplishments, commenting that action such
as that taken in North Carolina would be supported by the
people. Many industrialists, looking at prospective sites for expan-
sion, were principally interested in the question of educational
facilities and standards, realizing that there were direct corre-
lations between education and the caliber of the worker, edu-
cation and tolerance, and education and the crime rate. Sanford
called for a greatly strengthened school system, one "concerned
with all hopes, all needs, all abilities." The space gap was as
nothing compared to the education gap, and the North Carolina
Governor concluded by urging the group to put education first.
380
Papers of Terry Sanford
NORTH CAROLINA ASSOCIATION
FOR RETARDED CHILDREN
Raleigh
November 13, 1963
In discussing retardation, Governor Sanford said that of all
the miracles and achievements of the ages, nothing approached
the human mind in magnificence and potential. He expressed
happiness in working with the members of the North Carolina
Association for Retarded Children who were seeking to open
doors for those whose minds did not fully develop. The Governor
called mental retardation a problem of concern to all Americans
and to all humanity. Some 140,000 mentally retarded people lived
in North Carolina. The state had invested heavily in the edu-
cation of the average child, the gifted child, the blind and the
deaf; it was at last remembering the mentally retarded. Early
in 1962 the Governor's Commission for the Mentally Retarded,
made up of outstanding leaders in the field, was established. The
idea of a continuing Advisory Council on Mental Retardation
evolved. As a result the 1963 General Assembly provided new
support for mentally retarded citizens, including appropriations
for training of teachers and other personnel in this field. Though
the state was appropriating almost twice the amount spent four
years earlier, the Governor said North Carolina would have "done
enough only when we discover the cause, provide the care, and
offer a cure for the mentally retarded."
HARVARD UNIVERSITY
CAMBRmcE, Massachusetts
November 15, 1963
[The fact that Governor Sanford was invited to lecture at Harvard Uni-
versity was testimony to his leadership in the field of education. The Alfred
Dexter Simpson Lecture, sponsored jointly by the Harvard Graduate School
of Education and the New England School Development Council, was estab-
lished in 1961, to provide "an opportunity to explore the implications of
policy decisions relating to education as well as the effect of education on
national and international developments." This address, with the ensuing
discussion period questions and answers, was published in pamphlet form
by the New England School Development Council.]
Although I never had the pleasure of knowing Professor Alfred
Public Addresses and Summaries
381
Dexter Simpson/^^ I am honored to speak here tonight under
the aegis of your remembrance of him. His investment in his
Harvard classroom pays dividends to the children of today. His
founding of the New England School Development Council
demonstrates his conviction that our schools will never achieve
their fullest potentialities unless educators and laymen, public
officials and private citizens, combine their energy and share their
understanding, and work together for improvement which now
becomes both more difficult and more urgent each year. I flatter
myself in feeling a kinship with him because of his faith in the
worth of regional efforts to improve the region and to give
example to the rest of the country. Although I had no part in
founding the Southern Regional Education Board, I have served
for two years as its chairman, and this participation has brought
home to me clearly the new strength to be found in such regional
enterprises.
I am here this evening, however, under two impressive auspices.
At Harvard for the first time, I come with a sense of great respect.
I remember reading of another North Carolinian, the young Tom
Wolfe, who was counseled by Harvard graduate and University
of North Carolina Philosophy Professor Horace Williams to go
to Harvard for additional study. Wolfe, on the mere mention of
the name of Harvard, tells us that to him— Wolfe the auto-
biographical narrator— it was "not the name of the university— it
was rich magic, wealth, elegance, joy, proud loneliness, rich books
and golden browsing; it was an enchanted name like Cairo and
Damascus." And he felt somehow that it gave a reason, a goal of
profit, to his wild ecstasy.
It is perhaps difficult for you here in Cambridge to compre-
hend the full meaning which the word "Harvard" has for people
all over the world. Founded within two decades of the landing of
the Mayflower, Harvard was the first-born child of the American
pioneers. John Adams has written of them:
The Puritans transmitted to their posterity ... a hereditary ardor for
liberty and thirst for knowledge . . . [whose] civic and religious principles
. . . conspired to prompt them to use every measure and take every pre-
caution in their power to propagate and perpetuate knowledge. For this
purpose they laid very early the foundations of colleges and . . . made an
early provision by law that every town consisting of so many families should
be always furnished with a grammar school. They made it a crime for such
a town to be destitute of a grammar schoolmaster for a few months, and
^°»Alfred Dexter Simpson (1891-1955) , author and educator from Vermont and
Massachusetts; history teacher, principal; visiting lecturer on education at Harvard;
Professor of Education at Harvard from 1941 until his death. Who Was Who in
America, III, 788. ...
382
Papers of Terry Sanford
subjected it to a heavy penalty. So that the education of all ranks of people
was made the care and expense of the public, in a manner that I believe
has been unknown to any other people, ancient or modern.
In the same way that the influence of Harvard must have been
instrumental in the enactment of the 1641 law to which Adams
referred. Harvard has been from its birth a vital moving force in
the nation's history. In education, Harvard means excellence, the
closest approximation on this earth to the platonic idea of a
community of scholars. In government and education also, Har-
vard means dynamic leadership, the kind of vision exemplified
by Conant and Keppel and Kennedy.
The texts used nationwide are written at Harvard. The new
curriculums and devices employed across the land are often de-
vised at Harvard. Today's Horace Williamses are still trained at
Harvard, and their inspiration sheds its warmth and light on
many young minds all across the land.
And in these exciting and dangerous times when the mind's
freedom is itself besieged, Harvard means courage in act as well
as word, and by her courage she inspires determination to prevent
the circumscription of liberty anywhere.
Indeed, Harvard, in so many ways, is the beacon of excellence
and vision and the bulwark of liberty.
You did not, however, invite me here to tell you about your-
self. Neither could you have invited me here to speak as an
educator. I am not that, and perhaps I can redeem both you and
me by making no such pretensions.
I do believe with John Fischer and Francis Keppel that it is
time to put education first in American endeavors, and that school
administrators have therein a responsibility for leadership to a
degree beyond that generally acknowledged or expected.
I believe also that elected officials have a responsibility for
promoting education and supporting, upholding, and encouraging
school leaders to a degree beyond that generally acknowledged
or expected. Thus a governor can have a part in school adminis-
tration, "broadly conceived," without pretending to become an
educator. In fact, he must take a part, because he is charged with
the promotion of the general welfare, and directly responsible
for schools or not, I am certain that nothing more greatly influ-
ences the general welfare than does education.
Sometime ago a newly-elected governor told me that he realized
there was much to be done in education in America, that he
wanted to get ahead of other states by strengthening his educa-
tional system. He reaffirmed this hope in his inaugural address.
Then, only recently, he asked me a question to which I have
found no clear answer. "Where in the world," he wondered, "do
Public Addresses and Summaries
383
you go to find out what needs to be done, what is important, what
is urgent, what is good and what is at best harmless? How do you
determine priorities; it is obvious we couldn't do everything
needed all at once even if we had all the money on earth."
He told me his story of budget requests, from his state chief
school administrator for help in teacher pay, free books, equip-
ment supplements, and general support; from county officials
wanting state bonds for school construction; from various boards
and groups for industrial training, schools for the blind, for
retarded children, for educational television, for adult education,
for retraining and rehabilitation, for community colleges, for
the university itself; and, from someone, for something, for
money, everywhere he turned.
"You get the impression," he concluded, "that money will
solve all of our problems in education, when indeed it will not.
At best it is only the instrument, and the question of how to use
this instrument, how to invest wisely the limited amounts we
can obtain, what plan, program, and priorities to follow with
what money we have, this question lingers on."
The delay and confusion experienced by this governor in being
able to find the problem, the central need, the urgent first steps
are disappointing because his state has long needed a governor
with such dedication. The broader implications are that no
state has clearly defined its goals, its purposes, it steps for advance-
ment in education— total education. The truth of the matter
is that education and its priorities are complex in a complex
world and that it is not simple to find clear answers.
This complexity doesn't justify a failure to try, and indeed
compels trying as hard as we can.
Education is going to be tremendously expensive over the next
twenty years. This is not because "the cost of everything is going
up," but rather because we are now engaged in a process which
is drastically different. In the first place everybody will require
an education, and that education must be beyond that previously
considered adequate in variety, extent, and quality. We cannot
afford duplication because we have hardly enough money avail-
able to do the essential. We cannot afford the continuance of
gaps or countenance long delays in bridging them, because our
society depends for its success on the leadership of its educated
members. Neither can we afford the many soft spots, the neglect,
the failure to draw a large population into the community of
the educated.
Just as you have experienced severe drought in New England,
so have we. Three weeks ago there came to my office a man who
lives about three counties in from our coastline. This was the
384
Papers of Terry San ford
time when Hurricane Ginny was trying to decide if it wanted
to attack North Carolina's coast or go on out to sea. I recounted
the steps of preparation we had taken: the readiness of the high-
way patrol, civil defense, the Highway Commission, the Red
Cross, and people alerted and buildings battened down. At that
point, I commented, there was nothing left to do but to say
a little prayer.
My visitor looked up sharply, as if I had offended him by re-
ferring so piously to prayer. "Did you really pray?" he asked.
"I did," I said.
"Well I want you to know I don't appreciate it," he said, "My
crops needed the rain."
I told this gentleman not to blame me for his problem, that I
really had very little influence up there.
Let me say first that we need a good siege of rain in American
education. We might even get a small hurricane in American
education if we don't begin to pray and seek our own souls,
because I believe that there are few other endeavors which are
no more than 50 per cent effective in which the people involved
are so complacent about themselves.
Let us suppose a situation during the Battle of the Bulge of
World War 11 in Belgium. The enemy had gained many ad-
vantages by surprise and maneuver. The weather was deplorable
and the whole battle situation was tense and crucial. If the Ger-
mans could maintain the force and press of their surprise attack,
they were on the way to at least a negotiated peace. The allied
troops could see in defeat frustration, delay, and a tremendous
disadvantage of position in spite of overwhelming superiority and
earlier gain.
All in all, on a miniature scale, it was a prelude to the con-
fusion and frustration, the surprise maneuver of the enemy, the
crucial importance of every move, which we find in the world
today.
Now if you had been with a particular battalion during that
battle, you might well have seen orders come down to attack and
take a wooded hill which, by the very nature of the flow and
fluidity of the battle situation, could have been crucial to the
holding of the battle lines and the repelling of the Germans.
There weren't many battle-worthy units capable of full effort
immediately available, so this battalion was, in strength and
experience, in a position of leadership at the moment, even if in
a small way in the total sweep of a war, crucial to the hopes of
freedom-loving people the world over. The task was theirs. Failure
could have been costly. General Eisenhower, General Bradley,
General Ridgeway, the allied Army, the American people, the
Public Addresses and Summaries
385
British Commonwealth, the French, looked, even if unaware, to
this battalion at this point and at this critical moment to hold
that part of the line and stem the attack and save the battle.
Let us suppose that the battalion commander, in consultation
with his staff and company commanders, and for reasons known
only unto themselves, had failed to understand the seriousness,
or the purpose, or the urgency of their role in the sweep of history.
Let us suppose that they had said that half of the men will be
armed, half of the men will be put into action, half of the men
will make the effort, half of the men will at this time and place
and spot protect the free world and the over-all and broad cause
of mankind. Let us suppose that they had said to the other half:
"You go your own way; do what you want to do; we are not going
to use you; and whether or not you have guns and ammunition
and move into position is of no moment to us."
This is hard to imagine because it would not have happened
and in fact did not happen. The battalion took the ground and
did its part in the cause of the free world. The supposition itself
is ridiculous.
As ridiculous as it is, it has its parallel in the world today.
America stands in the position of holding the line against the
attack and maneuver of the totalitarian world. Its place and spot
in history may be relatively small in the sweeping events of the
total history of mankind, but its position is crucial, and the battle
can be lost, and the advantage can be dissipated, and free men can
be the loser of many gains. Every day is the most important day.
For in America, where every man is needed, where every talent
is essential, where every resource must be mobilized, the word is
out that we are not going to use half of the troops. They will be
unarmed. They will not be in the fight.
For in America today, when brain power, and only brain power,
will hold the line and product the gains and establish free man in
a position of dominance, half of the brain power is not being
used.
It is as if we did not understand the crucial nature of our
responsibility. It is as if we did not understand that the battle
is dangerous and that every man is needed, and needed fully
armed. America, the leader of the free world, is sending into
battle not more than half. To paraphrase Abraham Lincoln,
America cannot exist half educated and half ignorant.
Do we not know that it is no longer the rifle but the brain
that defends the nation? Do we not know that the cause of free-
dom is to be fought and won by the educated mind? Do we not
know that the free world looks to America and that the freedom of
man demands trained and skilled people, every person available
386
Papers of Terry Sanford
and that we cannot afford to dissipate our strength by dismissing
a full one-half of the troops?
In too many of our school districts only five, or fewer, out of
ten children finish high school. And of those who finish most are
not qualified or ready to do anything productive, either for them-
selves or society. In too many schools the preparation has been
solely or primarily for college, and if you believe this has been
accomplished either thoroughly or successfully, ask any college
instructor.
At colleges we have all too many situations described so well by
a college president about three years ago who, half serious, said,
"I get 'em illiterate and I graduate 'em illiterate." By no means
is that comment descriptive of all of American higher education,
but it does describe far too much of what passes for American
education, and the statement was made by the president of a
teacher's college. So the school administrator points the finger
back to teacher training, with some justification in most places.
Considering these conditions, some of our more reckless col-
leagues want to see the small hurricane descend on American edu-
cation. I am one who only prays for rain.
In any event, the storm which is hovering around will insist that
we part with a fe^v cherished notions and make certain changes.
For one thing ^ve need to get into our heads a clear understand-
ing of the proper relationship between people and schools: that
schools exist for people, and not people for schools. For example,
we must abandon the notion that genius will win out on its own,
that the talented child will find his own way through the edu-
cational system. The assumption is made that it is not the duty
of the school system to pay special attention to the gifted and the
talented— that they might even be harmed by such attention. They
might be weakened, the theory goes, because the world belongs to
those who compete for their places in it.
Competition we believe in, but if we really believe in the
validity of this concept, we would revert to the log cabin and the
unsupervised study by firelight. The thesis simply doesn't stand
up in fact as applied to the talented children, and it doesn't stand
up for any group or program either. The schools cannot design
a program and content themselves simply to hope that it meets
every modern need and that every child will be able to make out
somehow.
If it is only the accident of birth and circumstance which is
responsible for genius, why is it that far more geniuses are born
and reared in some places than in others? I contend instead, that
it is birth and circumstance plus one other element, educational
opportunity. Genius develops where the educational ground has
Public Addresses and Summaries
387
been plowed for the talented, the crop has been nurtured, the
plants have been protected, the sun has been allowed to get
through to them, and the harvest is more plentiful. There are
exceptions, of course, but where this kind of cultivation of genius
has not taken place, we find bare, caked, eroded fields in which
talent simply will not mature. There is a certain toughness to the
plants that grow here, a fibrous toughness, but they are scattered
and warped.
It can be observed in almost any state that there is not, to say
the least, enough mental discipline in most of the schools and that
there is not enough demanded of those students who are capable
of exceptional and superior work. To continue to let off the
student of such capabilities with the easy path of the average
is to deny him fulfillment and to deny society a resource it must
have.
The challenge given the gifted student should be that he make
the most of the rich sustenance made available to him. The chal-
lenge to school administration is to provide the sustenance. The
sooner the student knows what he can accomplish, and the more
he is persuaded that he is falling short when he does not exert his
full effort, the stronger will be his development, provided nourish-
ment is available.
I do not know the answer and have no idea that there is one
answer. Testing, national or regional standards, and entrance
requirements all have a place in providing motivation, but these
are at best artificial. There are many other ways to strike the
spark.
In my state we had the advantage of reviewing from across the
country a number of programs for the gifted student. Some of
them work; some fit a situation and some do not; some are very
good, some are not so good; and none can be considered as fixed
and final.
A commission authorized when Luther Hodges was governor of
North Carolina studied, reviewed, set up pilot programs, and
recommended several alternative approaches. These are being
adopted by local school systems, and depending on size, situation,
and other factors, you will find today special groupings, special
classes, advanced programs, additional assignments, and other
devices to add to the challenge of those capable.
Three years ago we had 2,500 students, last year 5,000, this year
7,500, and in a few years we hope to reach an enrollment of
about 50,000 in these local programs. They should be, and I
hope are, subject to constant re-evaluation, because so much is
yet to be learned. This has been one of the softer spots in edu-
588
Papers of Terry Sanford
cation, and I am simply saying we must seek, as we are seeking,
ways to firm it up.
This past summer, as a capstone for this program, but also for
the more important purpose of seeing how students can work and
accomplish when both unlimited and unpressured, the Governor's
School was created. With the help of a grant from the Carnegie
Foundation and other private sources, this school was authorized
for three years with the expectation that it would be included in
the state budget after that time if its worth is demonstrated. It is
directed by the State Board of Education, and accepts 400 students
without any costs to them for an eight-week period during the
summer. Selection is made from two groups, the intellectually
gifted and the artistically talented.
Now we are not as good as we want to be and expect to be.
The Governor's School taught us many lessons, but even with its
shortcomings, it was received by students, parents, teachers, and
the public with unbounded enthusiasm. I expect it will be even
better next summer.
I do not suggest that we have any final answers, but we have,
as a matter of broad public policy, determined that the school
program should give the utmost effort to challenging children
of ability all the way to the limits of that ability.
We found that children whose talents are artistic are different
from those whose gifts are intellectual; but both are included, and
this interweaving of art and intellect made the Governor's School
all the richer. We found the use of the arts stimulating to the
academic pursuits of the group, creating an atmosphere of
pleasure in learning and doing.
The High School of Performing Arts in New York should re-
ceive careful attention in any planning. In its basic approach this
is another vocational school, but there are some lessons to be
drawn for general use in teaching the talented, and teaching the
average, and, perhaps, in teaching the limited. Graduates of this
school, where only three hours a day are devoted to academic
work, did well enough on their SAT scores to cause their school
to rank third in the entire New York City school system.
Right now we are designing a state-wide school for the per-
forming arts, which will admit artists of high school and college
age. This was authorized by the last session of our General
Assembly. There were some good-natured jokes about the "flute-
tooters bill" and the "toe-dancing bill"; nevertheless the legis-
lators granted the authority and voted the funds, and that progress
is the best evidence of a broad and humane vision.
Let us hope that, as the hurricane hovers near us, some rain will
Public Addresses and Summaries
389
fall on the intellectually gifted and the artistically talented and
on the programs for them.
Some rain ought also to fall on our programs for the dis-
advantaged, the retarded child, the physically handicapped, and
the environmentally and culturally handicapped.
There are so many soft spots in our school program, but I do
not think we need to get too discouraged when we remember that
it was a very few years ago when most school administrators paid
only scant attention to the physically handicapped, and stoutly
declined to assume any responsibility for our mentally retarded.
Who doesn't remember poor little Willie following his older, or
younger, brothers and sisters to school, attending whatever class
would tolerate him, the butt of schoolyard jokes (unless the older
brother was large enough to defend him) , entering a race which
he could never win or even finish. That a warm-hearted and
generous society could have forgotten these children for so long
is disgraceful. But that is being changed, and it is indeed time
for generous rains to fall on the programs and hopes for the
retarded child. These children are the concern of national em-
phasis now, and gone or going is the public school policy which
ignores their needs.
Let me quote from our own Superintendent of Public Instruc-
tion, Dr. Charles F. Carroll:
There is no better evidence of North Carolina's attitude toward the edu-
cation of its youth than that revealed in its provisions for exceptional chil-
dren. As all of you know, this program is relatively new. In fact, on a state-
wide basis it is only in its 15th year. I glory in the opportunity afforded
me from time to time to relate the record of achievements. . . . From 1949
through last school year, our Special Education Program has grown from
one serving 2,161 pupils to a program serving 27,484 . . . [in] Speech and
Hearing Handicapped Program . . . classes for the visually handicapped . . .
for the crippled . . . for the educable mentally retarded . . . for trainable
mentally retarded. . . . The number of Special Education teachers increased
from a total of 54 in 1949-50 to 766. . . . During the current school year,
1963-64, we estimate that nearly 35,000 children will be enrolled in Special
Education classes. . . . The number of Special Education teachers employed
in this service this year is approximately 924, an increase of 155 over last
year. . . . [Of those] 884 are employed from State funds, while 40 teachers
are locally financed.
I cite this to indicate total commitment to this responsibility.
No one knows the answers here, but we are learning about causes,
teaching and learning possibilities, rehabilitation, counseling for
parents, and we even have some hope of finding the means of pre-
vention. Not only must the school pick up its share of the
responsibility for the education, but it must share with other
agencies the total responsibility. I noted with great satisfaction
390
Papers of Terry Sanford
our superintendent's talking just last week about "a co-ordination
of efforts" and also the use of "more of the resources of a total
school program for retarded students." This is "administration,
broadly conceived" applied to the needs of retarded children:
complete concern, complete co-operation, constant effort to im-
prove.
There is another kind of disadvantaged child who has been
suffering from educational drought for at least forty years, to my
knowledge; one ^ve have hardly been willing to recognize, much
less set about helping. Recognizing his disadvantage is part of the
education of school administrators and public officials as they
become committed to a program of education which embraces all
special needs. I have a hunch that his may be the largest single
group in need of special consideration.
I remember a little girl, with golden blonde hair, in the second
grade of a school in the Great Smoky Mountains of my state.
She couldn't read. I noticed her particularly. Whereas most
children welcome a governor much as they would a brown bear
or some other unusual creature, not so this child. She simply
looked at the floor, shy and silent. The teacher said she didn't fit
in and didn't like school.
This ^vas the same expression I had seen in many other
places, and I thought it might tell us something. When I got back
to Raleigh, I asked an assistant to look into the situation. He told
me later that he had learned that while her family was well
respected, neither of her parents could read or write. This little
girl had entered school without ever having seen a book opened.
She was unprepared to understand ho^v in the ^vorld meaning
could be got onto or off of a piece of paper.
She was no^v unhappy at home just as she "vvas at school, and
her parents couldn't understand this for she had once been a
bright and happy child, with a sense of humor and a delightful
way of singing songs.
I am not convinced that the child is the one who is responsible
for her early failure. I'm not sure her family is, either, for they
carry on a culture which is respected and respectable, and they
would like to see this little girl fit in and "do the right thing."
The fault is not the teacher's, for she had all she could do to keep
track of some thirty children. It was not the principal's fault, it is
said, for the school had always operated on the assumption that
it had a program that children must fit into.
As I see it, the fault is this assumption. This is the main reason
for all the soft spots. The school administrator cannot be content
unless he has a program which can be made to fit the needs of
all the students. In the mountains, as well as in other sections,
Public Addresses and Summaries
391
and even— indeed particularly— in the gray areas of the great cities,
are many children who are from a culture that is now out of date,
in fact, never was up to date. These people are not verbally
minded.
This little blonde girl had seen her grandfather and father
carve wooden toys, hook up the horse and go out to plow, cut
wood; she had seen her mother weave and make pepper relish
and bake a wonderful apple pie. She was brought up in such a
friendly world and couldn't understand that which was a com-
pletely different world. Why is it that the school cannot take time
to find something which this little girl can do well, and thus
give her the confidence to do better all the other things the school
will offer? Why is it that the school can find no way to introduce
her to the strange world of school? Why is it that we are not
paying attention to these children who are truly disadvantaged,
who will never quite comprehend school, who will fall further
and further behind, eventually to become one more dropout
statistic?
It is, of course, all right to say we do not have the money, and
let it go at that. But I don't think money is the chief problem.
I think a false sense of toughness and an inclination toward
obstinacy are our chief problems in too many schools.
In North Carolina we have just received a grant of $2 million
from the Ford Foundation, and we've matched it with state
funds, to run experiments in some of our schools, in the first
three grades, to find out how we can do a better job of teaching
reading, writing, and arithmetic. There is much support for free
public kindergartens to get children ready for the first grade, and
I do not rule out this approach; but it seems to me that we
should do a satisfactory job with six-year olds in the first grade
before branching out to take on five-year olds in kindergarten.
We are not getting first graders ready for the second grade, nor
third graders ready for the fourth grade. With this grant we
expect to try ungraded classes, teacher aides, team teaching, pre-
school classes, greatly reduced class sizes; also we might experi-
ment with the use of music, art, and handicrafts, because it is not
inconceivable that these things might help the child to read.
In the case of the little mountain girl, our problem is with a
child who comes from what is essentially a healthy environment.
We have other children in our schools all across America who
come from unhealthy environments. Their problems are not going
to be solved easily. If the school is going to educate them perhaps
it had best go out into their neighborhoods. Getting school, wel-
fare, and public agencies to work together is not the easiest thing
in the world to do; but New Haven and Oakland, as well as other
392
Papers of Terry Sanford
locations, are ^vrestling with this. In our state, we have just
launched a determined, planned attack on what we call "the cycle
of poverty," because we observed that these disadvantaged chil-
dren of poverty were coming into our schools, finding them a
strange world indeed, and ultimately slipping out to become, in
turn, the parents of poverty.
To do this we have set up the North Carolina Fund with
over $10 million in project money, including large grants from
the Ford, Z. Smith Reynolds, and Mary Reynolds Babcock
foundations. We expect to say to the superintendents of schools,
to the directors of welfare, officials of public health, city and
county government, social agencies, that we need to work to-
gether; let's pick out a few neighborhoods to see what we can
do to stop the cycle of poverty ^vhich blights the lives of so many
of these young people.
This will be a tremendous effort, but the ultimate purpose will
be to show us how the schools and other agencies can work to-
gether to do the total job. We cannot operate forever on foun-
dation grants, and in time the schools and other agencies must
find their way to achieving these goals as a part of their routine
functions.
Certainly on these disadvantaged children of poverty must fall
some of the beneficial rains of education.
All across our country we need to carry on such experiments.
We must see what will happen if we get the school out into the
arena where living and decision-making are going on. No doubt
some of the schools in disadvantaged neighborhoods will need to
be made into community centers with employment, welfare,
health, and recreational activities in them, with classes for parents
as well as children. Maybe we will even get radical enough to
start assigning some of our better teachers to these schools.
Certainly school people will need more often to discuss their
programs with employment people. In San Francisco there is an
imaginative program which we are adapting to the needs of our
state. Called the Richmond Project, it involves a team-teaching
method in high schools. Each of four teachers has a given
class for one or more hours a day. One teacher is from math, one
from physics, one from English, one from the shop. The students
take up a main topic; one week it might be the diesel engine. In
physics and math they study the principles; in English they write
about it and learn not only new words but the reason for being
able to write clearly; in shop they will build some part of the
engine.
The inescapable fact is that the students respond to school. As
Public Addresses and Summaries
393
one of them said to a representative of mine, "Mister, this is the
first time school ever made any sense to me."
Many of them discover college ambitions; others plan to go on
to technical schools. Their work in English and other subjects
improves.
This is not cited as the only way to develop a more meaningful
curriculum, but rather as an example of creativeness in providing
for the total needs of the students. We expect this year to adapt
this program to the needs of the students in some of our schools.
In addition to the programs for the children with all their
varying needs, we also should have better programs for adults.
Often a person who didn't do so well in school later in life realizes
his handicap and wants another chance. Also, a man often realizes
that he isn't trained for new jobs, and he needs training, or re-
training. Sometimes a person wants to know more about litera-
ture, science, history, the ways of the world. With increasing
leisure, with changing technologies, adult education becomes
more and more a concern of a comprehensive policy of total
education.
We have twenty industrial education centers across the state
concerned primarily with education beyond the high school. In
addition we have the blueprint and the appropriations for com-
munity colleges which will be comprehensive in approach and
will offer mostly adult education along with college parallel
work. Some of the industrial education centers will be merged or
expanded into comprehensive community colleges. We expect to
have this kind of education beyond the high school, but not
necessarily requiring a high school diploma, within easy reach
of every citizen of the state.
We need to improve programs for all of the people in all of
these ways, and many more, and in planning priorities we can-
not overlook the colleges because they in turn determine the
quality of secondary education. We need special attention for
the colleges used primarily by Negro students. At one time it was
urged that these schools be abandoned, but that is not realistic.
We need to improve them.
The other day we received a call from an official of a great
university in the Midwest who wanted to know which was our best
state college with a high Negro enrollment; he said his institution
might want to develop some kind of co-operative program. We
sent back word we would rather have his university help the worst,
but if he didn't want a real problem he could take the best.
Already the University of North Carolina has such a co-operative
program with one of our colleges originally organized for Negro
394
Papers of Terry Sanford
students. We would welcome such an interest by colleges and
universities in New England and other parts of the country.
With all of these efforts, we need to keep our eye on the quality
at the topmost level, the university. We now have three campuses:
Chapel Hill, North Carolina State at Raleigh, and Greensboro.
It would be a mistake to have special programs for the gifted
which deprive the average child of his rights; it would be a mis-
take to help the poor child at the expense of the opportunities of
others. It would be a drastic mistake to reduce support of the uni-
versity in order to help the colleges, or to expand secondary edu-
cation, or to do anything else in education. We cannot try to
elevate our general condition by pulling down our leadership.
We need other efforts, and must invest money where the need
is, and must direct it squarely at the need. All of these many other
needs will not automatically be fullfilled just because we have
an outsanding university. But we cannot meet them adequately
unless we do have a university of excellence; and indeed to reach
our total effort with good sense and with accuracy will require
the leadership of all our universities.
I had a talk about this kind of leadership two weeks ago with
the president of the University of North Carolina, the president
of Duke, and the chairman of the State Board of Education. We
are trying to find a way to start a center of educational research
and evaluation. It is astounding that we have not done much
of this in America. I note that Dean Keppel told you two years
ago that the educational enterprise "is now conducted with a bare
fraction of one per cent devoted to research and development."
The emphasis should be on the word "bare."
In addition to a lack of total public policy, there are so many
things we do not know. What about the proper teaching of read-
ing? I sense in the public a growing frustration; but calm com-
parison and evaluation of the several techniques— not name-call-
ing—is what we need. I suspect all methods have some virtue, but
in any event we cannot spare the specialists a generation to resolve
their differences. What about an ungraded primary school? When
should we commence teaching foreign languages? How many
languages? Do English teachers have too many students? Do
junior high school teachers have enough preparation in subject
matter they teach?
Are science laboratory specifications proper? Is television in
education being developed properly? Are visual aids used prop-
erly? When and how long should we teach participation in our
appreciation of the arts? Is there any merit in homogeneous
grouping in academic subjects and heterogeneous grouping in
Public Addresses and Summaries
395
nonacademic subjects? What kind of vocational training, and
when?
We cannot have a total program of education without having
the answer to these and hundreds of additional questions.
We need to look at everything, contemplate all, study what is
studied, look at total needs, establish priorities, seek the best,
develop our full capacity, and reach everybody. With this re-
search and development we must constantly refine educational
policy, making this the strong force in state progress, a policy
which will use all we have available for the best development of
the state.
I anticipate that such a center of research and evaluation would
work with the Governor's School, with other specialized schools,
with programs all over the state, with the high schools and with
schools below and beyond the high school, and indeed with total
education. We are also thinking about setting up what we will
call the "Advancement School," where students who have fallen
behind might come for concentrated study, using the best tech-
niques, the best devices, so that they might catch up rather than
quit. This would serve not only as a means of reclaiming lost
students but would provide the subjects for additional research.
I have had nothing to say about the devices of teaching, but
neither have I had much to say about the methods of teaching. I
was tempted, I will admit, but this is not the role for a governor to
play. Both of these subjects will see much improvement and refine-
ment, and both are challenging to public and school officials.
Our research center, working with the universities, could evalu-
ate and refine and apply the best.
Neither have I said anything about the bulwark of our civili-
zation, the average student. I have not forgotten him. Rather I
have assumed that every school administrator recognizes the need
for general improvement, and every school administrator is
engaged in seeking such improvement. As we start special
projects, and as we reach for the soft spots in the total program,
we must concern ourselves with across-the-board improvement of
the quality and excellence of our schools. We have these many
needs, and we must not, like Hamlet, allow the conflicting alterna-
tives to puzzle our will to act.
Obviously a total program will cost much more than we have
ever spent for education. But any way you look at it this money
is an investment and will be returned to us many times over.
It is more than just an investment for rich dividends, it is the
price of survival.
We will need a more effective partnership with the federal
government. Federal efforts have developed historically in a patch-
396
Papers of Terry Sanford
work and overlapping fashion which is as detrimental to edu-
cation generally as it is beneficial to the specific favored programs.
We cannot, however, sit around waiting for Congress to do its
part. In each state, county, city, and school district we must issue a
call to arms. Leadership will respond to such a call and the people
will respond to leadership.
It is time we put education first in America, and in a way and
manner which is total.
Why should we be content with 50 per cent effectiveness? Why
not 70 per cent? Indeed, why not 100 per cent?
I have reviewed with you a number of things, similar to
progress being made across the nation, all showing that perhaps
the rains are beginning to fall. They are falling on the poor as
well as the rich, on the Negro as well as the white, on the for-
gotten as well as the average. We are making progress, you are
contributing to progress, and more is ahead for all of us.
I urge you who wish to honor Professor Simpson to memorialize
him by continuing to assume and exert leadership, leadership
broadly conceived, in order that the ideal of America may be
made as real and meaningful and far-reaching as possible.
Together, in this spirit, you can work toward the time when,
as a future John Adams might point out, the education of all
ranks of people was made the care and expense of the public, in
a manner unknown to any other people ancient or modern, and
by so doing we fulfill the old dream of an older day, adapted to
our own challenges.
Then all the places of our country, as a future Tom Wolfe
might point out, will be places of rich magic.
KENTUCKY ASSOCIATION FOR MENTAL HEALTH
Louisville, Kentucky
November 19, 1963
Governor Sanford observed that sometimes people acted as if
the world had gone mad; he gave examples of speeders and of
great nations "flexing their atoms and other armaments," but he
added that meetings of those interested in mental health proved
otherwise. With half the hospital beds in America filled by people
^vith mental problems, the seriousness of the situation was evident.
The Governor gave statistics concerning mental illness and said
that a cure had to be found. Though support in the field of
mental health had begun, much remained to be done. Regional
Public Addresses and Summaries
397
effort by southern states to fight mental illness and retardation
resulted in a plan called "Commitment to Health." Sanford en-
couraged support for this plan, a plan agreed to by Kentucky
and North Carolina and other southern states. The "Commitment
to Health" set forth several goals: to seek ways to prevent mental
disorders from occurring and to prevent needless disabling; to
work for the best care of the mentally ill and retarded; and to
strengthen forces "from which we derive the capacity to live
productively and tolerate the stress and strain of living." Mental
health leaders were called upon to improve services; to provide
essential services for diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation; to
provide emergency psychiatric treatment on a 24-hour a day basis;
and to set up a network of local mental health services. Sanford
reminded the group of the necessity of changing the attitude of
the public toward the mentally ill. He urged state officials to co-
operate and to provide funds to meet the needs for personnel,
equipment, and research. He said North Carolina was spending
twice as much that biennium as had been spent in the 1959-
1961 period on hospitals for the retarded and for the mentally ill,
but the amount was still insufficient. "We will have done
enough," Sanford concluded, "only when we have done to mental
illness and mental retardation what we did long ago to small-
pox, tetanus and the other dread diseases."
NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GOVERNMENT
OF THE NATIONAL MUNICIPAL LEAGUE
Detroit, Michigan
November 19, 1963
The importance of cities was stressed by Governor Sanford,
who stated that "Our cities are the command posts and the com-
munications centers of our technological society. Even the nerve
ends of agriculture come together in the market place." The
power to create nations was derived from cities; states were in-
debted to their urban ancestry. State governments too often
rebuffed city leaders in requests for legislation to help meet
problems; consequently, they had to turn to the federal govern-
ment. The Governor called attention to legislative apportion-
ment, which was tied in with this philosophy; he referred to
blights on urban areas and on the lives of men, saying blights
thwarted the spirit and soul of men. Sanford urged that visions
for cities be made realities, describing the "Piedmont Crescent" in
398
Papers of Terry Sanford
this connection and adding that states would have to assume their
share of responsibility in planning growth of cities as many prob-
lems extended beyond the boundaries of a single city. Stronger
cities, the Governor concluded, would mean stronger states.
ALBEMARLE AREA DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION
Edenton
December 13, 1963
Governor Sanford told the Albemarle Area Development As-
sociation that state government was ineffective if it had to operate
alone. He proceeded to make the statement particularly appli-
cable to the area development program, calling the association a
fine example of the value of local initiative and solutions supple-
mented by the state's technical assistance. With travel increasing.
North Carolina could become a goal of vacationers. The Coastal
Historyland Trail was a notable example of the way history could
be used effectively as a natural resource. Sanford commented that
when people got together and decided what they wanted, the
state could support them along similar lines. In other areas of
mutual concern, such as the development of food processing
industries, the Albemarle group had taken the lead. Sanford
observed that education was important to the area, that roads
and bridges were vital to the economy, and that through local
leadership and appropriated money these and other projects
would move ahead. He said the state was happy to work with the
Albemarle area in its many development opportunities.
DEDICATION OF FIRST FLIGHT AIRPORT
Kill Devil Hills
December 17, 1963
[In a two-day celebration on the Outer Banks, the sixtieth anniversary
o£ the air age was celebrated. The dedication of the First Flight Airport
was the climax, and Governor Sanford's address was followed by a colorfully-
staged air parade and display. The ribbon-cutting ceremony was unusual
and memorable; Governor Sanford and former Governor Luther H. Hodges
boirded a twin-engine plane, which severed the ribbon on take-off. Some
? dignitaries attended the celebration, including several visitors from
Ohio, the home state of the Wright brothers.]
Public Addresses and Summ ies
399
On behalf of all the citizens of North Carolina, I am happy
to welcome each of you to this ceremony commemorating the
sixtieth anniversary of the first airplane flight.
This section of North Carolina has marl.eH three of the historic
firsts of American heritage. Just across tne I anoke Sound is the
site of the first English settlement in the Nev Vorld. A few miles
west of here is the town of Halifax where th st declaration for
independence for this nation was adopted.
So, in this small area here in northeastern North Carolina a
new nation was begun, a people declared for freedom, and man
began his reach for the stars.
When Orville Wright flew the first airplane flight in history
here sixty years ago today, his plane rose 10 feet high and
traveled 120 feet before a forced landing. The flight lasted
twelve seconds. Two weeks ago we had the Faith 7 Mercury
Spacecraft capsule on exhibit at the State Capitol in Raleigh.
Faith 7 was in orbit thirty-four hours. It traveled 546,000 miles-
circling the earth twenty-two times. It reached a height of 165
miles.
This is indicative of the advances man has made in scientific
and technological fields in this century.
As one of the astronauts rose in his spacecraft from Cape
Kennedy, he mentioned on his radio that he had an excellent view
of the Outer Banks of North Carolina. It seems appropriate that
after sixty years of flying that space-bound flyers should note
this narrow strip of land where man first raised himself from
the ground.
On the monument to the Wright brothers are the words,
. . conceived by genius, achieved by dauntless resolution and
unconquerable faith."
Those words, reflecting the action of the Wright brothers, and
reflecting also Sir Walter Raleigh's settlement on Roanoke Island
and the Halifax Resolves for "Independency," are tributes to
man's determination and man's capabilities to do "impossible."
Sometimes in this day of missiles, it is easy to wish that man
had never left the ground. But we know that should man cease to
seek to soar, the qualities which made him dare the seas to come
to this land would be gone, too.
Airplanes have been used to blitz great cities and rain death
upon the people in them. But they also have been used and are
being used and will be used to speed people to their loved ones,
to rush food and clothing and life's blood itself to the devastated,
to encourage and expedite commerce, and in hundreds of other
ways to make life better.
It is an unhappy commentary on the human race that we always
400
Papers of Terry Sanford
have made advances faster and farther in physical sciences and
in technology than we have in the social sciences and the humani-
ties.
But, it is my firm belief that if man can raise a plane in the
air, he also can raise the opportunities for all the children born
in this land of ours, and in every land.
If we can fly a plane fast enough to break the natural boundaries
of the sound barrier, surely we can break the boundaries of the
cycle of poverty.
If we can develop fuel that raises tons of metal into the air,
surely we can distribute food to feed the hungry.
If we can invent systems to land planes by instruments, cer-
tainly we can overcome physical and mental diseases.
If we can overcome the barriers of space itself, surely we can
overcome the barriers to true peace on earth and good will
toward all men.
I'll admit these problems of human relations are more difficult.
It used to be said that it would be as easy to go to the moon as
it would be to relieve suffering and poverty or to teach people
how to live with one another peacefully. But we are well on
the way to the moon. It is just possible that the ratification of
the nuclear test agreement means that we are on the way toward
abolishing war.
The Wright brothers taught us much more than the funda-
mentals of aerodynamics. They taught the lesson that all things
are possible.
If we are willing to dedicate to the problems that still stalk the
earth as much attention and effort as we are now^ putting in the
drive to conquer space, then we ^vill begin to overcome the prob-
lems of ignorance, illness, poverty, bigotry, and oppression.
It would seem to me that in the dedication of this First
Flight Airport, we should dedicate ourselves to the goal of using
the genius of man, the dauntless resolution of man, and the un-
conquerable faith of man to send the hopes of man soaring just
as the Wright brothers sent a plane soaring.
DEDICATION OF W. W. HOLDING
INDUSTRIAL EDUCATION CENTER
Raleigh
January 8, 1964
Speaking at the dedication of the W. W. Holding Industrial
Education Center, the Governor reiterated that "brain power has
Public Addresses and Summaries
401
replaced back power," and that North Carolinians were willing
to make sacrifices for educational opportunities. After mentioning
a number of programs in the field of education, the Governor said
that unemployment and underemployment could be reduced only
through education. The Department of Conservation and De-
velopment, the Department of Agriculture, the Board of Science
and Technology, and the Research Triangle were working to
produce new wealth through new jobs and new projects. All
efforts would be to no avail, however, without educated minds,
and industrial education centers provided the means of training
craftsmen and technicians. These groups had been neglected in
that training had not been provided for them with the result that
jobs often went unfilled. The industrial education centers were
called by the Governor "an integral part of our answer to unem-
ployment, underemployment, and poverty. . . ." The center was
dedicated "to the education of the people of Wake County and
to the growth of North Carolina."
NORTH CAROLINA PRESS ASSOCIATION
Chapel Hill
January 16, 1964
The Governor reviewed with editors and reporters some of the
achievements of 1963. He discussed advances in education, both
in the public schools and in the area of higher education, con-
cluding that the true payoff would come with the increased
ability of children. He spoke of new industries, meaning new
jobs; of new food processing programs; and of the motto "1.6
by '66," which meant farm income of at least $1.6 billion by
1966. The Governor also mentioned the highway improvements
made in 1963; the decrease in prison population brought about
through the co-operative efforts of the Probation, Paroles, and
Prisons departments; and the boost given the mental health pro-
gram through the establishment of the Department of Mental
Health and new appropriations for the mentally retarded. Though
state government had grown with the population, the number of
state and local governmental employees, in proportion to popu-
lation, was among the lowest in the nation. The credit rating of
North Carolina was the highest in the nation. Governor Sanford
expressed confidence in the ability of the citizens of the state
to meet problems of 1964 and in the willingness of the press to
help the state build on its past to achieve a richer future.
402
Papers of Terry Sanford
DISTINGUISHED SERVICE AWARD
AND BOSSES' NIGHT BANQUET
Hickory
January 30, 1964
Taking as his theme the matter of economy in government,
Sanford gave examples from state operations. He said that a recent
survey of state agencies to determine ways to save showed that
agencies had already practiced economy, that reversions each
quarter saved a million dollars or so, and that waste was elimi-
nated by use of the state-wide systems of roads and prisons and
the state-supported schools. The Executive Budget Act provided
controls whereby money appropriated did not have to be spent
unless adequate justification existed, and the budget had always
to be balanced. Sanford ended by reminding his audience that
economy and efficiency were daily watchwords through North
Carolina's governmental agencies.
ANNUAL WORKSHOP FOR COTTAGE COUNSELORS
Samarcand Manor^ Eagle Springs
February 4, 1964
Meeting with counselors at one of the state training schools.
Governor Sanford commented that over 90 per cent of the young
people going through the training schools had no further be-
havior problems. He said North Carolina was giving people who
had not had advantages a better opportunity so they could have
a better life. Though problems existed, and needs were great, the
state had to remember that every child was important and that
the 10 per cent creating further problems needed help. Sanford
observed that between a fifth and a third of the people lived in
conditions of poverty, and the cycle of poverty had to be broken.
The opportunity existed for institutions to work with those
from poor homes, to give them needed vision and spark. Chil-
dren in training schools needed educational services, employ-
ment services, health services. Governor Sanford commended the
leaders for the role they were playing and expressed appreciation
from the state for the job being done.
Public Addresses and Summaries
403
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE
Raleigh
February 6, 1964
The Governor advocated adoption of the slogan, "Be Proud of
North Carolina," for industrial development workers and for all
North Carolina citizens. The state had a population of efficient
people, an abundance of rich land, a good water supply, a temper-
ate climate, an excellent transportation system with tracks of
twenty-eight railroads and excellent airline service, and the asset
of an outstanding educational system. Sanford said industrialists
were interested in good schools, in good government, and in a
sound fiscal system. North Carolina's soundness was demonstrated
by its low per capita long-term indebtedness, its high credit rating,
its reversions from appropriations. New individual and corporate
citizens of North Carolina were proud of the state, and those
born in the state had many reasons to share in that pride.
TARHEEL ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP ASSOCIATION
Raleigh
February 11, 1964
Sanford began by recalling the days without electricity and
without telephones, days in which communication was difficult.
He expressed thanks to the Rural Electrification Authority and
organizations like the Tarheel Electric Membership Association
which had worked with private companies to light the country-
side. All of the state's economy had benefited as the REA and
free enterprise had worked together. Governor Sanford was criti-
cal of remarks such as those made by Senator Barry Goldwater,
who had charged the program with being socialistic. With nearly
every political philosophy represented at this meeting, the Gov-
ernor expressed doubt that there was a single socialist in the
audience and said that there was need and room for both co-
operatives and private utility companies. He added that he looked
forward to the healthy operation of both.
404
Papers of Terry Sanford
ROTARY DISTRICT 769
Southern Pines
March 7, 1964
Speaking to a group of Rotarians, Governor Sanford proposed
a partnership against poverty. Members of Rotary were affiliated
with an organization which put "service above self." The Gov-
ernor then discussed the North Carolina Fund, which was en-
doTved by private funds to fight poverty. Only a fraction of
the fifty-one proposals from sixty-six counties could be accepted,
and Sanford expressed hope that the rejected programs could be
implemented. He called attention to reasons for low income,
including overdependence on agriculture and on one or two crops,
late industrial development, and the ravages of the Civil War.
The cycle of poverty had to be broken, and the responsibility lay
with government at all levels and with civic leadership. The
biggest instrument to change the course of poverty was education.
Though the North Carolina Fund had only scratched the surface,
it was hoped that it would show communities how to act to break
the cycle. Local groups were being urged to initiate efforts to
implement local projects, either with or without North Carolina
Fund support. North Carolina had the resources, the knowledge,
the people to overcome the existing situation and could set the
pattern for America. Sanford said Tar Heels had "the courage
and the compassion to do it."
TRAVEL COUNCIL OF NORTH CAROLINA
Raleigh
March 16, 1964
Travel and recreation were no longer for the few, Governor
Sanford told the Travel Council. He stated that mechanization
and automation had created time for leisure and recreation,
making the tourist trade big business. He urged the group to
help North Carolina attract tourists who would spend their
entire vacations in the state rather than stop by overnight on their
way elsewhere. Good accommodations, meals, recreation pro-
grams, and special attractions were essential, as was the preser-
vation of the state's beauty. A resort training and research insti-
tute, which would look into new ideas and methods in the areas
of food, lodging, and recreation, was being planned. Sanford
o ^
f I
O
Si
c 2
(u o
> bo
o c
Concern with tobacco problems remained with Sanford throughout his adminis-
tration. The tobacco health scare created unusual worry in addition to normal
agricultural problems relating to North Carolina's number-one farm product.
Sanford is here inspecting tobacco in the field in July, 1962.
Public Addresses and Summaries
405
commented that travel and recreation meant money— which
should be going into the pockets of North Carolinians.
TESTIMONY BY GOVERNOR SANFORD
TO THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C.
March 18, 1964
After the tobacco health scare, various proposals were made
with regard to the labeling of cigarettes and other tobacco
products. The Governor appeared before the Federal Trade
Commission in Washington to give testimony on the issue. He
commented that the proposed ruling would directly affect the
economic welfare of North Carolina, that the controversy over
tobacco and health was based on circumstantial evidence. While
the health hazard should not be minimized, the fact remained
that further research was needed; the evidence was indicative, but
it did consist of assumption, and did not prove that moderate
smoking was harmful. The Governor expressed the hope that
cigarettes would not be labeled "a health hazard." He said that
those who grew tobacco and manufactured tobacco products
were concerned for public health and wanted safe tobacco
products. Tobacco manufacturers were, in fact, the largest con-
tributors to research being sponsored by both the Tobacco Indus-
try Research Committee and the American Medical Association.
The true problem was not cigarette smoking; rather, it was the
cause and cure of cancer. The Governor mentioned North Caro-
lina's three-member co-ordinating committee of scientific adminis-
trators who were to draw together all resources for cancer re-
search. Sanford went on to tell the commission members that
the tobacco economy in North Carolina was of great magnitude
and that the government at all levels was a partner in the tobacco
business through the imposition and collection of taxes. For
example, tobacco contributed, in 1963, $2,030,304,000 to the
federal government, a sum more than twice the total income of
all tobacco farmers for their crop. The Governor continued with
facts concerning the significance of tobacco to the economy of the
country. He observed that the problem was many-sided, that
automobiles and whisky could easily be considered potential
dangers, and that excessiveness in any area was dangerous. He
concluded by asking for moderation from the Federal Trade
Commission, appealing for fairness.
406
Papers of Terry Sanford
FORTY-FOURTH ANNUAL CONVENTION
OF AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF JUNIOR COLLEGES
Bal Harbour^ Florida
April 1, 1964
Having attended a junior college himself and having supported
a comprehensive community college system in North Carolina,
Governor Sanford was well qualified to speak to the American
Association of Junior Colleges. In 1921 America had 207 junior
colleges "with some 16,000 students; in 1964 the number had
grown to 694 ^vith over 900,000 students. Junior colleges, origi-
nally patterned on the first two years of senior liberal arts colleges,
had expanded their role and were constituting "a bridge in the
American educational system ... a bridge from high school to
senior colleges ... a bridge to better jobs ... a bridge to a better
living and a better life." By 1970, 42,000 more students in North
Carolina ^vould be wanting to go to college than in 1962. Of that
number, 10,000 would be provided for by private institutions, but
of the remaining 32,000, many would be unable to go away to
collesfe. The state would not have sufficient revenues to meet the
needs for dormitory space. To insure post-high school studies
to those who should continue their education, the system of com-
prehensive community colleges ^vas recommended to the 1963
General Assembly. The Governor referred to the community
college as "an excellent vehicle to carry education to the people
at the loTvest possible cost to the students, the parents, and to the
taxpayers." The attempt to "diversify and decentralize . . . [the]
state-supported college system" Tvas made in hopes of overcoming
the severe shortage of space in senior colleges and of providing
college parallel ^vork and vocational-technical training for many
more of the state's youth than Avould otherwise be possible. If
such plans ^vere to succeed the support of all levels of govern-
ment and of all citizens ^vas needed. Sanford ended his address
by referring to the community colleges as "the outstanding new
educational development in America . . ." in this century.
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
OF TOBACCO DISTRIBUTORS
Miami Beach, Florida
April 6, 1964
[In January, 1964, Governor Sanford cited statistics showing that nearly
half of North Carolina's cash farm receipts came from tobacco, that Tar
Public Addresses and Summaries
407
Heel factories turned out 61 per cent of the nation's cigarettes, that 120,000
of the state's farm families grew tobacco, and that more than $2 billion was
paid in annual federal tobacco taxes. These statements show why the state
reacted with alarm to the unsettled legal allotment issue with Georgia,
foreign competition, declining leaf quality, and particularly the Surgeon
General's report on smoking as a health hazard. In this major policy speech,
Sanford went beyond the bounds of narrow sectional interests and encom-
passed the physical, mental, and economic needs of all America. His
insistence on reason over fear was typical of his earlier testimony before
such bodies as the Federal Trade Commission in Washington. For a sum-
mary of the testimony of March 18, 1964, see page 405.]
As a governor, I am charged with many responsibilities for
protecting the health of my people. I take those responsibilities
seriously. I also am given many responsibilities to protect the
economic health of my people, and I do not minimize these
responsibiUties.
Evidence has been presented that excessive smoking is in-
jurious. We also have some evidence, far more than we need, that
some people who believe smoking is harmful would take steps
which would destroy tobacco farming and the tobacco industry.
I believe there is a better way to protect the total health of our
people.
As Governor of North Carolina, I am concerned with the
physical health, interested in the economic health, and charged
with promoting both. Therefore, I am compelled to examine
carefully the Report of the Advisory Committee to the Surgeon
General, and to enter conscientiously the effort to clarify the
findings and to answer the questions raised, and to do it in a way
which does not affect adversely either physical or economic health.
I have neither direct involvement nor financial interest in
farming, manufacturing, or distributing tobacco; but I have a
direct concern for all of the people involved in all of these
activities. And whether we call it health or economic life, we are
talking about people, and people are my immediate responsibility.
My state has more than its normal ratio of people vitally
interested in the future of tobacco. Their interest is shared by
millions of other American people, including you.
People grow tobacco— some three million of them— in twenty-
one states reaching from Florida and Puerto Rico as far north as
Massachusetts and as far west as Kansas and Minnesota.
People process tobacco— some 100,000 of them working in
auction warehouses, handling plants, and factories.
People distribute tobacco products— you people— some 4,500 of
you around this nation. And on the backbone of tobacco products,
thousands of other lo^v-cost consumer items piggy-back into the
408
Papers of Terry Sanford
market place, providing a distribution system for hundreds of
small manufacturers of non-tobacco products.
People sell tobacco products— in every town, village, and cross-
roads of America; in tobacco shops, groceries and supermarkets;
in drug stores, restaurants, and service stations. We know there
are plenty of people— small independent retailers— with nothing
more than a stand in a hotel lobby who depend on tobacco
sales for their livelihood.
People supply goods and services for the tobacco industry.
Fertilizer and lime, cloth and twine, machinery and equipment,
cellophane and aluminum foil, packages and cartons, distribution
services by trucks, railroads, and airplanes. Literally millions of
people are engaged in supplying thousands of needed goods and
services.
All together there are some 21 million people involved to
some degree in growing, manufacturing, and distributing tobacco.
Most important of a.\\— people use tobacco. These people are a
large proportion of the adult population in this country, and
they are consumers by their own free choice. It is for these millions
who use and enjoy tobacco that the tobacco industry exists, in
all its component parts.
The people of my state, you people here, other millions else-
where in the tobacco business, are all committed to serving
such customers as the secretary who relaxes for a few minutes
with a smoke at her coffee break, the active business executive
who finds his constant pace eased by his cigarette or pipe, the
fisherman who just couldn't enjoy the sport without his tobacco,
the contemplative scientist who sees formulas in smoke rings,
the inspirational creative artist who visualizes his ideas with the
aid of a puff, and the soldier in the training grounds or battle-
field who at times prefers cigarettes to medals.
There is not any room for doubt that smoking brings pleasure,
enjoyment, and contentment to millions of people each day. This
is the best evidence that there is neither reason for our farmers to
become discouraged nor any reason for your industry to panic.
I see for the tobacco industry new levels of growth and pros-
perity, once it is freed from the cloud of health considerations by
scientific research and discovery into the basic causes of cancer
and diseases of the heart and respiratory systems.
I do not in any way discredit the report to the Surgeon Gen-
eral; but when I am asked if it doesn't pin down the condem-
nation of tobacco, once and for all, my answer is, emphatically,
that it does not.
But, someone may ask, doesn't the Report of the Advisory
Public Addresses and Summaries
409
Committee to the Surgeon General say smokers are harming
themselves, that smoke is "dangerous to the lungs?"
And, doesn't the report say that smoke "causes inflammatory
condition of the mucous membrane of the larynx, trachea, and
bronchus and affects the circulatory organs of the body"?
It may surprise you, but the fact is that these quotations did
not come from the Report of the Advisory Committee to the
Surgeon General. The first one is lifted from King James'
Counterblast to Tobacco, written 360 years ago, in 1604. The
second one came from a British medical magazine, published 107
years ago, in 1857.
It is, I suppose, only small comfort that the pleasurable uses of
tobacco have gone through repeated cycles of attack and condem-
nation of varying extremes.
Each century has had its dedicated forces, who were positive
that the world's ills could be traced to tobacco and that im-
mortality and the millenium would somehow be achieved if
tobacco were abolished.
Within the past month in New York City, the cornerstone of
the famous New York Times Tower was opened to disclose some
newspapers put there in 1904. Here are some problems reported
in the press of that day: Box office practices of Broadway theaters
were being criticized— even as today; the police were hot after
the Mafia organization— as they are today; bloody uprisings
were being reported from Africa; New York commuters were
complaining of delays on the railroads; and, sure enough, promi-
nent on the front page of one major newspaper Ella Wheeler
Wilcox, the poetess, was writing, "AH statistics go to prove that
the cigarette habit"— really, that is a direct quotation about
statistics— they go to prove, she wrote, that cigarette smoking is
injurious, "physically, mentally and morally— one or all three
ways without exception."
That was sixty years ago and, along with international unrest
and late trains, statistics are still with us.
My major purpose in relating some historical background is to
bring into focus the fact that tobacco use spread among the
peoples of the world is an enjoyable and relaxing custom in spite
of the voices raised all along the way in notes of doom about its
use. And it spread among the peoples of the world long before
there were modern newspapers or radio commercials or tele-
vision. As one student of tobacco history has observed, "Tobacco
has always been its own best salesman."
The truth is that tobacco filled a need— call it psychological
or social or tranquilizing or what you like. The New World's
new plant filled a need and want among many millions of people
410
Papers of Terry Sanford
for several centuries before our modern-day cigarette industry.
This truth appears to be ignored by those who would try to stifle
cigarette advertising as the only reason why people smoke. They
simply are ignoring facts.
What has happened in the past sixty years, since Miss Wilcox
wrote about her statistical link between cigarettes and the physi-
cal, mental, and moral ills of the nation?
We are bombarded today with the statistics of human troubles:
social, economic, and some in the field of health. At the same
time, there are more cheerful statistics, if we but pause to appre-
ciate them.
Since the days of Miss Wilcox, the average life expectancy of
the United States citizen has been extended from a little more
than forty-seven years to over seventy years today— a gain of
twenty-three years or about half the life span of the early 1900's.
This is a fine tribute to medical science and its success in finding
ways to save people in their early years who might otherwise have
died with life unfulfilled.
Even more specifically, the death rates for major respiratory
diseases— or diseases of the lung— have literally plummeted from
about 430 per year per 100,000 of population at the turn of the
century to slightly over sixty deaths per 100,000 population today.
This is only 14 per cent of what it was sixty years ago. Again, this
reflects the progress in our standards of living and medical care.
It is a fact, although I give it no significance, that there is a
strong statistical correlation between these cheerful trends in vital
statistics and statistics showing that it was in this same period that
cigarettes grew in popularity to become the most predominant
form of tobacco use.
In passing, let me observe that if the health trend had been
in the opposite direction, with such a statistical correlation avail-
able, the blame almost certainly would have been heaped upon
the cigarette! This seems to me to be a reasonable assumption
because the campaigns against tobacco today are being waged
primarily with statistical correlations of one kind or another.
Here is an example of how statistics are used to indict tobacco,
and how difficult it is to get at the facts behind the statistics:
We know there is great headline potential in trying to link
cigarette smoking with almost any phenomenon that is of human
interest. In recent years, considerable attention has been given,
with all manner of insinuations, to studies saying that smoking
by expectant mothers results in a higher percentage of premature
babies than among nonsmoking mothers. These reports were
given public attention with the strong suggestion that something
terrible was happening because of smoking.
Public Addresses and Summaries
411
What are the facts? In the first place, the word "premature" is
often applied to any baby under a certain weight and doesn't
really mean what most people assume. More importantly, when
a thorough-going study of some 6,800 babies of both smoking
and nonsmoking mothers was made, a completely different con-
clusion was reached.
Published earlier this year, this study found that the death
rates among the underweight infants of nonsmoking mothers
were actually higher than among those born to smoking mothers.
The conclusion is that while smoking mothers are more likely
to have the smaller or premature babies, these babies are much
less likely to die at birth than similar babies of nonsmokers. The
reporting scientist noted that these relationships were not likely
to he either causal or direct.
I wonder how long it will be before this study of real babies
and what happens to them will replace the legend of the statistics?
The moral is that it is easier to spread a slander than to overcome
its damage, even when truth and fact are the weapons of rebuttal.
I became interested in some items of an article carried by an
important publication concerning the Advisory Committee's
report on smoking. So I enlisted some help to have the matter
looked into. Even now, I find it difficult to straighten out the
misinformation as a result of the report and the dramatically
staged press conference of last January 11.
I'll start by citing the gist of the statements in the article and
then what we were able to find out was actually so.
Here are some of the items:
First, the press report referred to findings of "a population
study of over one million men, since 1951. . . ."
The fact is, there was no such study. Several different studies
were conducted. The largest population study mentioned in the
report to the Surgeon General covered 448,000 men and only
twenty-two months— not some thirteen years. The actual number
of deaths studied ^vas 1 1,600— or about 2.5 per cent of the number
of men involved, and about 1 per cent of the million men which
the article indicated were studied.
Also, the statement in the Report of the Advisory Committee
that lung cancer deaths total 41,000 a year calls for some techni-
cal clarification. The Advisory Committee's report did not give
the slightest recognition to the uncertainties involved in such a
flat use of the 41,000 figure.
The fact is that deaths from lung cancer are recorded in two
ways. In 1961, the latest year for which figures are available to
me, there were 19,662 deaths recorded for primary cancer of the
lung, which means the doctor said the lung was the site of origin.
412
Papers of Terry Sanford
In addition, there were 19,467 lung-cancer deaths recorded for
which the doctor didn't say whether the disease began in the lungs
or spread there from some other part of the body— which, I am
told, quite frequently happens. And when the cancer originates
somewhere else and spreads to the lungs, it's ridiculous to blame
cigarettes. And yet these two different figures are lumped together,
without explanation.
Is it any wonder that persons who enjoy the custom of cigarette
smoking are dazzled by the statistics thrown at them? How can
you or I quickly get the facts that can clarify a misleading state-
ment, imperiously tossed out without qualification as to au-
thenticity?
Here is another item reported in the publication: "Seven hydro-
carbons found in cigarette smoke have been proved to be carcino-
genic [cancer-causing] in laboratory animals. . . ." This, too,
comes from the Advisory Committee's Report.
But what else does the Report say? It says that the "amount of
known carcinogens in cigarette smoke is too small to account" for
activity seen on laboratory animals.
The further fact is that this Report does not specify any sub-
stance in tobacco smoke that would account for causing a disease.
And yet how many people realize this, among the millions of
Americans to whom the Report was conveyed as an official finding
on the smoking and health question?
Without going into detail, it is possible to tick oflP a number of
other importc'^nt points that might be made about this Report, to
show that this particular dubious line isn't quite long enough to
reach to the bottom of the puzzle of human ailments.
1. The Report says in at least two places that "statistical
methods cannot establish proof of a causal relationship in an
association." And yet, as far as I can determine, the Report
proceeds to rely on statistics to arrive at its conclusions which
condemn smoking.
2. The Report says that "no simple cause-and-effect relation-
ship is likely to exist between a complex product like tobacco
smoke and a specific disease in the variable human organisms."
This to me says exactly what many others believe: The Report
raised a lot of questions but it didn't find the answers.
3. The Report admits the existence of other factors, such as
viruses, genetics, and previous lung ailments, but says the role
of these can't be fully explained. Certainly, by giving only pass-
ing notice to these and by brushing aside such possible factors
as air pollution, the Report does not give a full picture of the
diseases that were studied.
Public Addresses and Summaries
413
4. The Report admits that the populations covered in the
statistical studies are not representative of the U.S. male popu-
lation. And it goes on to say that to apply the results of these
studies to general populations involved "unverifiable judgment"
—which in my language means simply opinions that can't be
proved.
5. The Report concedes that animal experiments have failed to
show any mechanism by which tobacco smoke could cause cancer
or other diseases. And it admits that inhalation of tobacco smoke
by experimental animals has failed to produce lung cancer, even
though other substances inhaled by such animals have resulted in
lung cancer.
There are other areas of the Report which also pose questions
which tobacco's opponents find it is convenient to ignore.
Many critics of tobacco continue to cite nicotine as a suspect
substance. The Report examined existing research and concluded
that nicotine "probably does not represent a significant health
problem" for smokers and other users of tobacco products.
Be sure to remember that one, the next time someone sounds
off against nicotine.
I make no claim to the competence wdiich would be necessary
to attempt a scientific analysis of the Advisory Committee Report
to the Surgeon General. It is becoming clearer every day, how-
ever, that the Report is by no means satisfactory to many doctors
and scientists, either in its consideration of questions concerning
tobacco use or in its contribution to scientific understanding of
the diseases to which it addresses itself.
Writing in the Virginia Medical Monthly, Dr. Harry J.
Warthen said: "Despite the general impression to the contrary,
this Report falls short of proving the relationship between smok-
ing and cancer." Incidentally, Dr. Warthen explained that he was
not defending cigarettes but saying "that the Report bears out
what physicians have known for a long time— namely, that the
causes of cancer are complex and the present survey has done
little to clarify the subject."
It is gratifying— and in some ways surprising— to observe that
so many doctors and scientists have dared to express skepticism
in public print about the Report, which initially was received so
authoritatively.
Dr. Frank Figge, a well-known cancer research scientist at the
University of Maryland, said: "I know these views are in disagree-
ment with the statistics, but I believe individual susceptibility to
cancer must be taken into account. ... If not susceptible to lung
cancer— and apparently 90 per cent of the population isn't— a
person can smoke till doomsday and it won't hurt."
414
Papers of Terry Sanford
Author of a recognized textbook on lung cancer, Dr. Milton
Rosenblatt, chief of medical clinics at New York Metropolitan
Hospital, was quoted as saying: "It appears from the Report that
the Surgeon General's Committee w^as greatly influenced by the
statistical studies. . . . The fact is that we have no evidence that
there has been an actual increase in the incidence of lung cancer
during the past fcAV decades because ^ve have no reliable com-
parative data. . . . The cause of lung cancer and other cancers are
still an enigma requiring much additional research."
And there are others, such as the doctor from Idaho ^vho wrote
the Wall Street Journal and said that by using the same statistical
methods, it could be stated that tuberculosis "might have ceased
to become a major cause of death due to the beneficial effects of
smoking cigarettes."
Then there is the attitude expressed by Dr. Irvine Page of
Cleveland, a former president of the American Heart Association
^\ ho doesn't go along with the gloomy outlook that everything you
like is bad for you.
"It's just that w^e are continuing to become aware of a large
number of things that can be dangerous," says Dr. Page. "Auto-
mobiles, alcohol, smoking— and a lot of other things— can be
harmful if you don't use them properly." Dr. Page recently
gave some ten guide points in a report issued in February, and
one guide was: "Avoid excesses in everything but don't miss
anything." From the ancient Greeks came the admonition,
"Nothing in Excess." I believe that most Americans with any
horse sense ^vill recognize that in all things of life excesses should
be avoided, and this applies to our speed in automobiles, to our
eating, drinking and smoking habits, to our pleasures, to our
exercises, and to our work.
I do not believe that those who enjoy tobacco should suffer
an excess of slings and arro^vs at the hands of excessively dedi-
cated regulators of our individual manners and customs. And yet
this appears to be the desire of many of tobacco's critics.
One of North Carolina's most illustrious sons was the late
Josephus Daniels, Tar Heel editor, statesman, and cabinet mem-
ber. Ambassador Daniels ^vas no advocate of smoking, but his ire
was directed chiefly at liquor because, as he put it, he never knew
a man who beat his ^vife because he smoked.
Since the wwld-wide publicity given to the Report of the Ad-
visory Committee, I have received letters from all parts of the
Josephus Daniels (1862-1948) , editor and publisher of the News and Observer
in Raleigh, 1894-1948; Secretary of the Navy in Wilson's cabinet, 1913-1921; Am-
bassador to Mexico, 1933-1942. Who Was Who in America, II, 143.
Public Addresses and Summaries
415
world and a good many of them record that some doctors sug-
gest cigarettes as a means of relaxation.
Whether smoking of tobacco, especially cigarettes, contributes
to the health risk of smokers, or whether smokers are, in general,
the type of persons who live the kind of life that increases their
health risk is still a valid and unanswered question. Even the
Report of the Advisory Committee admits there must be many
constitutional and psychological elements involved in the statisti-
cal association upon which the Report is largely based.
Here is another area worthy of attention from competent re-
searchers. If there is a special health risk in use of tobacco for
some people, why is this so? The Report of the Advisory Com-
mittee does not offer any solid suggestions on the question. The
Report fails to name a substance, or specify a mechanism, that
will fully explain the decision to accept the statistical association.
In fact, the committee specifically avoided any estimates of what
the statistics really meant in terms of the general population.
On this point, I refer to testimony given a couple of weeks
ago, before the Federal Trade Commission, by Assistant Surgeon
General Hundley. He was asked if he could give some idea of
what the statistics meant in terms of the general population. He
replied that the Advisory Committee debated whether— in
Hundley's own words— "to try to make some statistical compu-
tations and derive some sort of a figure. . . ." But, Dr. Hundley
continued, it was decided not to try this because "so many as-
sumptions had to be made that it was feared that the statistic
would be as misleading as it was informative."
He then went on to say that the figures used to claim a risk
among smokers "are not representative of the U.S. population
as a whole and how you can translate that to the U.S. population
as a whole is the difficulty."
It should be kept in mind that the committee did not do any
of its own research in this area, but merely worked with previous
reports based on the study of cigarette smoking in relation to
various diseases.
What happens when the disease is studied, instead of cigarettes,
is indicated by a recent report in Germany, where a group of
distinguished physicians and pathologists studied actual lung-
cancer cases over a period of many years. In their report, just
issued, they determined that the evidence did not support the
claim that cigarette smoking was an important factor ... in fact,
most of the lung-cancer cases were found among the groups with
the least smoking.
And this report also cited another German study— sometimes
overlooked by smoking critics— in which it was found that less
416
Papers of Terry Sanford
than one-third of the lung-cancer patients under observation were
cigarette smokers. What about the other two-thirds? Regardless
of which percentage is valid, what about all the nonsmokers who
develop lung cancer? What about the victims of cancer other
than lung cancer? The fundamental question remains. What
causes cancer? No report has given us the answer to that.
I suggest two constructive courses of action:
1. The continuing study of tobacco and smoke to identify or
eliminate the suspected health risks.
2. The more intensive study of cancer and heart ailments—
which strike smokers and nonsmokers— to see if we can crack
the question of what causes these diseases. This will answer the
questions about tobacco. More important, we will be in a position
to find the cures for dread diseases which strike those who smoke,
and those who do not.
That progress is being made in such research is encouraging.
The American Heart Association just last month reported that,
for the ten years of the 1950's, the cardiovascular death rates
among men between forty-five and sixty-five have actually been
going down. This is most welcome news, coming as it does in a
period when cigarette smoking has been steadily climbing and
when there have been accelerating efforts by tobacco critics to
associate cigarette smoking with ailments of the heart.
Farmers and tobacco people have no desire to injure anyone's
health. The desire of the tobacco industry to expand and hasten
research into all phases of these health problems is well known.
Individual companies carry on extensive programs of product
research. The industry has supported for ten years a program of
independent health research, to the extent of $7.25 million so
far, through continuing support of the Council for Tobacco
Research. The companies also have pledged a five-year total of
1 10 million to the American Medical Association's new research
program on the health problems that have been associated with
tobacco.
This is just one element of the tobacco-interested public that
is contributing to such activities.
As I have reminded officials in Washington, there is another
element of the public that is contributing public funds, more
of which should be put to use in intensive research. I am speak-
ing of the tobacco-consuming public, and its payment into the
federal treasury of a sum in excise taxes which now totals well
over $2.2 billion a year. And this doesn't include over $1 billion
that is paid in taxes by tobacco users to states and municipalities.
Nor does it include the local taxes wholesalers pay because
you are in a business that depends upon tobacco products. You
Public Addresses and Summaries
417
bring to every community in the nation hundreds of needed
items. Without you, an important river in our transportation of
goods and services would be dried up completely. And without
the tobacco products that are the backbone of your businesses,
the flow of these other goods and services would also cease.
In the final analysis, I think all of us should give more thought
to a challenging question posed by the Report of the Advisory
Committee to the Surgeon General.
The Report asks, "What would satisfy the psychological needs
of the 70 million Americans who smoked in 1963 if they were
suddenly deprived of tobacco?"
Then the Report proceeds to admit that there is "no definitive
answer to this question," but Life magazine quoted one psychia-
trist as saying, "We might well have a nation of more alcoholics,
more fat people who eat too much, more gum-chewers, more
nail-biters, more people who simply talk too much."
So, in closing, I submit to you that the hour has its needs for
action, but certainly the need for any more people who talk too
much is not among them.
Thank you.
DAVIDSON COUNTY NCEA BANQUET
Lexington
April 8, 1964
Again Governor Sanford spoke on education in general and
on specific types of education in particular. He made reference
to the Higher Education Act adopted by the 1963 General As-
sembly and to plans made for the expansion of higher education
in North Carolina, to the Governor's School, to special training
for the mentally retarded, to the Learning Institute of North
Carolina, to Operation Second Chance, and to other programs
which he mentioned briefly. Though North Carolina had made
an outstanding start, much remained undone. The Governor
pledged to continue his efforts "until the last hour of the last
day I occupy this office." He said that Governor Hodges had
helped prepare the first budget of the Sanford administration
and he would help with that for the 1965-1967 biennium. To
make the program for children the best in the nation was a ten-
year project, and Sanford promised to do all he could to see that
the program was continued. He said he felt that the people were
in favor of quality education and that North Carolinians "have
418
Papers of Terry Sanford
the courage to go out and face the future and to grasp the oppor-
tunities of that future." Progress up the education ladder had
been made, but not enough progress to permit a standstill. Be-
cause North Carolinians had always supported education when
given an opportunity to do so, Governor Sanford felt confident
that they would continue to invest in their children's future.
EDUCARE
Los Angeles, California
April 10, 1964
Speaking to a California audience, Governor Sanford said
that North Carolina had followed the example of California in
many respects. A committee had gone from North Carolina to
study the California system when work was begun on the Higher
Education Act. The Governor declared that neither North Caro-
lina nor California was satisfied and that there would be no
need for an organization such as Educare if there was satisfaction.
The purpose in mentioning North Carolina was to emphasize
the point that people did understand education and would sup-
port it. The program in his state, Sanford told the group, was
possible because of the work and support of thousands of citizens.
Education was the first goal in North Carolina, a goal which had
also been put first by the legislature. With a system of state sup-
port of schools, legislative backing was imperative. The Gover-
nor went on to express the opinion that education and class-
rooms were vital if communism was to be stopped, because
ignorance was the greatest force for subversion. The greatest
infrigement of civil rights was the denial of the best educational
opportunities. All over the United States there was too little sup-
port for schools. The Governor commented on the correlation be-
tween education and crime; between education and earnings;
between education and the over-all welfare of the community,
state, and nation; between education and human tolerance; and
between education and the economy. Many questions were raised
by Sanford, all of which could be answered with the word "edu-
cation." He called on Americans to put education first because
the "extent of the advance of education will determine the
success, and even the survival, of this America of ours."
Public Addresses and Summaries
419
WESTERN CAROLINA COLLEGE ASSEMBLY
CULLOWHEE
April 14, 1964
The Governor spoke on the topic, "Opportunities Provided
by the State ot North Carolina to College Students." He stated
that the state afforded the chance "to build something worth-
while in an exciting land." The Appalachian program was to
be the beginning of a new, enriched, and rewarding era for
western North Carolina. In discussing reasons for the slow eco-
nomic growth in that section, Sanford went into some detail
concerning transportation and education. Federal funds for
roads were formerly allotted on the basis of the number of peo-
ple who used them, but this system was detrimental to certain
areas. After a "development factor" ^vas proposed, more high-
ways were constructed in the Appalachian region than ever
before, but the number was still insufficient. The Governor re-
minded graduates that they could be part of this growth and
development. In commenting on education, the Chief Executive
continued his talk by calling college graduates the leaders, add-
ing that schooling had to be adequate to enable children to
compete with people from all parts of the nation. He urged the
conservation of natural resources and the development of rec-
reational areas to attract new wealth, new people, and new
ideas. He concluded that many opportunities for a bright career
were open and that the state needed college graduates. "Stay
with us— the future is here." The answ^er to the question of
what North Carolina could do for college students was summed
up when Governor Sanford told the group that the state could
give them "life and opportunity."
MEETING OF COUNTY CHAIRMEN OF
JOHN FITZGERALD KENNEDY LIBRARY DRIVE
Chapel Hill
April 16, 1964
Governor Sanford spoke of the many reasons North Carolin-
ians wanted to honor President Kennedy by helping to erect the
Kennedy Library. The death of the President was a loss to North
Carolina, to America, and to the free world. The Governor
stated that veterans would want to contribute because Kennedy
was a Purple Heart veteran; mothers because he fought for
420
Papers of Terry Sanford
better educational opportunities for their children; older citi-
zens because he led the campaign to help them; businessmen
because he led the fight for an equitable tax reduction; farmers
because of his support of farm programs; and many parents
and grandparents because of his devotion to the fight against
mental retardation. North Carolina's goal of $230,000 was less
that the amount the state received from the Kennedy Foundation
for programs to combat mental retardation. Sanford remarked
that this was the one memorial in which Kennedy himself had
expressed an interest during his lifetime. The Governor thanked
the county chairmen, from both political parties, who had joined
in this campaign for the Kennedy Library.
STATEMENT BEFORE THE UNITED STATES HOUSE
OF REPRESENTATIVES, AD HOC SUBCOMMITTEE ON
THE WAR ON POVERTY PROGRAM OF THE
COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION AND LABOR
Washington, D. C.
April 17, 1964
Because North Carolina had pioneered with its own anti-
poverty program. Governor Sanford was invited to share the
experiences of his state with congressmen studying the possi-
bilities of a federal program of a similar nature. The Governor
began with a summary of the economic situation in North
Carolina and the fact that poverty did exist throughout the
state. The idea of the North Carolina Fund emerged and private
foundations were convinced of the validity of the suggestion
that they support the new program on a trial basis. Sanford said
that charity and relief were not answers, that people needed a
means to work themselves out of poverty and to become self-
supporting. With a $14 million grant from the Ford Foundation
and the Reynolds-Babcock Foundation, the program was imple-
mented. The Governor continued by showing how this program
would fit into the proposed Economic Opportunity Act by re-
viewing various provisions of the federal bill. His belief in
education as the ultimate key to the eradication of poverty was
confirmed by the provisions of the federal bill for such programs
as the Job Corps. The Governor explained how the North Caro-
lina Fund had worked, with communities surveying their own
needs and submitting their own proposals for projects which
would operate under the fund. He said that fifty-one projects
Public Addresses and Summaries
421
from sixty-six counties were submitted. Even those which were
rejected had been of value in that they had pointed out specific
needs in local communities; the federal plan would supplement
the North Carolina Fund and would help fulfill those needs.
Governor Sanford discussed and expressed approval of various
aspects of the federal act in some detail. In his concluding re-
marks he reminded the committee members that poverty existed
in the midst of plenty, that children of poverty would become
the parents of poverty, and that the cycle had to be broken.
"That is what the North Carolina Fund is about and that is
what the President's poverty program is about."
FOUNDATIONS GROUP
New York, New York
April 21, 1964
Speaking on the subject "A North Carolina Renaissance: A
State's Strategy for Human Development," Governor Sanford
observed that many foundations which had turned eyes and
funds toward North Carolina had representatives present. The
motto of the state, "To be rather than to seem," was the Amer-
ican dream; to help all citizens redeem this legacy, the state had
set up a series of developmental programs and experiments.
Governor Sanford said he entered office in 1961 with a mandate
for progress. Though North Carolina did not industrialize as
soon as other sections, the state was catching up and was expe-
riencing industrialization and automation in one period. Be-
cause too many North Carolinians remained on the outskirts
of the great American dream despite progress, action was imper-
ative; this action resulted in a close partnership between public
and private leadership. Private foundations participated, thereby
enabling the state to use an imagination not possible within
the limits of public budgetary restrictions. "Foundations can
use states to achieve their purposes of betterment. States can
use foundations to seek the fulfillment of human needs, aspira-
tions, and possibilities." The Governor listed fourteen projects
financed by foundations and briefly explained the purpose of
each. The influence and support permitted a new flexibility
which enabled North Carolina to see dramatic educational and
cultural results.
422
Papers of Terry Sanford
GOVERNOR'S CONFERENCE ON
OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Greensboro
April 23, 1964
The adult working age group was the one which had had its
health neglected more than any other, but North Carolina was
interested in measures to promote and protect the health of all.
The Governor stated that part of this interest had developed to
the extent that the Occupational Health Council, organized in
1958, worked co-operatively with the State Board of Health, the
Industrial Commission, the Department of Labor, and in some
areas, the Utilities Commission. It also sought participation of
the medical profession. Even with the co-operative work, how-
ever, the council would be helpless without the backing of man-
agement. Sanford observed that many employers were unfamiliar
with resources available to them. Absenteeism was a critical prob-
lem, with 75 or 80 per cent being caused by nonoccupational
illness. The Governor reminded the group that much of the
responsibility for the health of the worker rested with the work-
er himself, which called attention to the need for basic health
facts such as could be taught by the occupational health program.
In twenty or more counties the Medical Society's Committee on
Occupational Health had made available facts about physicians
willing to serve full time or part time in an industry's occupa-
tional health program. Specific programs of help to industry had
also been implemented in local health departments in several
areas.
NORTH CAROLINA PRODUCTS WEEK LUNCHEON
Raleigh
April 24, 1964
Governor Sanford called the grocery industry a vital link in
the system which relayed food from the farm to the dinner table.
He favored an expanded food industry, ^vhich would mean new
jobs, saying that state agencies were working co-operatively along
this line. The tobacco scare showed that North Carolina should
not put all its eggs in one basket or all its investments in one
crop. An intensive research program would find the cause and
cure of cancer, the Governor predicted, but tobacco farmers
Public Addresses and Summaries
423
should also diversify. Citing the dairy industry as one which had
grown in a few years, Governor Sanford continued by calling
attention to North Carolina foods which were being processed
in the state: pickles, country hams, sweet potatoes, poultry, and
peanuts. With 62 cents of every food dollar going for processing,
packaging, and advertising. North Carolina stood to gain by
expansion in this area. The Governor expressed pleasure at be-
ing able to join in the promotion of North Carolina Products
Week.
DEDICATION OF HERBERT C. BONNER BRIDGE
Oregon Inlet
May 2, 1964
This bridge, a link to the Outer Banks and a monument to
the early colonists, was dedicated in a ceremony in which San-
ford spoke of the spirit of the Roanoke Island settlers. Though
the colonists were lost, their spirit lived on and was the same
spirit which pushed to the west and which had served all Amer-
ica in times of stress and advancement. Pride and spirit were
evident in North Carolina as programs to strengthen education,
to curtail diversion of gasoline taxes from highway purposes, to
build and pave roads and bridges were provided for by the legis-
lature. Sanford spoke briefly of the history of support for roads
and highways from the 1920's to recent years, pointing out that
roads paved the way to industry. As population increases occurred,
many roads had to be resurfaced or rebuilt. This bridge, which
spanned Oregon Inlet for nearly 2.5 miles, was built to with-
stand winds of over 120 miles per hour. The Governor gave
statistical information about the bridge and stated that it had
cost just under |4 million. It was named for a great American,
Herbert C. Bonner, who served in Congress for over a quarter
of a century. Governor Sanford paid tribute to Bonner, saying
that the spirit and the courage of the first colonists were exempli-
fied in Congressman Bonner.
GROUND-BREAKING CEREMONIES
NORTH CAROLINA JEWISH HOME FOR THE AGED
Clemmons
May 3, 1964
The Governor began with a brief review of the contributions
424
Papers of Terry Sanford
made by the Jewish people to the state and commended the
group on the establishment of a home for the aged. He observed
that "an individual human being is the be-all and end-all of all
our own institutions. Nothing is worthwhile which is not di-
rected at the liberation of the individual human spirit, the
strengthening of a man making it possible for every human being
to develop himself to the ultimate bounds of the talents which
God put in him, enabling every human being to live life to the
fullest." He expressed the opinion that government existed to
aid the individual, adding that his administration was "founded
on the conviction that there were too many people in North
Carolina who did not have at their disposal the tools with which
to build their lives." Lack of educational opportunities, mental
retardation, physical handicaps, crime, and lack of roads were
all conditions which existed and which needed correcting. The
Governor then reviewed efforts made during his administration
to remedy the defects in the state of North Carolina.
INSTITUTE OF RELIGION
Raleigh
May 5, 1964
Speaking to the Institute of Religion at the United Church
in Raleigh, the Governor referred to the concern of the institute
with the promise of America. He went on to discuss North
Carolina's anti-poverty program, which was also about the prom-
ise of America, saying that that promise was the spirit with which
President Johnson had proposed the attack on poverty. Those
from tenant farms, slums, and blighted areas were seeking the
opportunity to become self-supporting. This was the reason
North Carolina paid so much attention to education, the reason
for the accelerated drive for industry, the reason for the North
Carolina Fund. Sanford cited progress in those areas and others,
hut he added that more remained to be done. All of the state's
human resources needed to be developed. While the state as a
whole was in the midst of prosperity, there were those who were
hungry, those with no skills, those "whose dreams . . . [would]
die." The cycle of poverty had to be broken; this was the purpose
of the North Carolina Fund. Children of poverty became parents
of poverty unless citizens, through government, civic organiza-
tions, and churches took positive action. Governor Sanford ob-
served that many of those critical of Johnson's program were
Public Addresses and Summaries
425
the same ones who benefited because of President Roosevelt's
programs. In closing, he said, "If we are to reach the moon and
the stars, and we are, surely we can reach also the man and the
woman and the boy and the girl on the wrong side of the tracks."
WELCOME TO PRESIDENT LYNDON B. JOHNSON
Rocky Mount
May 7, 1964
[In connection with the campaign against poverty, President Johnson
visited several areas of the country including North Carolina. At Rocky
Mount he spoke to an estimated crowd of 175,000; during the day he visited
a farm family whose income and education were below average. Governor
Sanford, in his speech of welcome to the President, showed that the program
to break the cycle of poverty was not a government handout but was a
sincere effort to help those who would help themselves.]
Mr. President, we welcome you to North Carolina.
You are not in a section of poverty, but you are in a section
where there is poverty.
You have been concerned about the millions of Americans
who are now living in poverty without any reasonable prospect
of help or hope.
We in North Carolina likewise have been concerned about
those of our people who cannot provide for themselves and their
children the basic necessities of life.
We know that, in the midst of plenty and prosperity, there are
people who have been displaced from the farm and the factory
by machines, and lack the education and technical training to
find other jobs; there are people who are eking out a bare
existence on the land with no future in sight for their children
to make a living on that land; there are people who have been
living in poverty for generations, who, with their children, now
are locked in a cycle of poverty.
Some of this poverty is deserved; some of it is undeserved.
But we cannot stand by and let apathy and despair destroy the
new generation of children now headed for a life of poverty.
Mr. President, all of these kinds of people are represented in
this courtroom today.
Our aim in North Carolina is to make it possible for every
child to receive a good education, to develop his talents, to ac-
quire the skills needed in the factory and on the farm, and to go
out into the world with the odds in his favor.
426
Papers of Terry Sanford
To make this possible we have provided more teachers, more
guidance counselors, and better supervision in our schools. We
are seeking better ways of teaching reading to the very young
and giving vocational education to our high school students. We
have developed a new system of industrial education centers
and community colleges to offer every person, whether or not
he is a high school graduate, the training or retraining he needs to
get a job.
But better education is not enough. Children must want to
learn. They must also understand that good jobs and decent
incomes depend on education. And they must see down the road
ahead of them job opportunities that will give them a chance
to use what they have learned.
The children of poverty will find neither motivation nor
opportunity if we can't find ways to encourage their parents. We
must insure that the family has the necessities of life: a decent
house, ample food and clothing, and good health care. We must
kindle the desire to succeed on the ashes of frustration.
For centuries men have tried to find answers to the paradox of
great need in the midst of plenty. Recognizing that we had to
try again to find new and realistic answers to these basic prob-
lems, we went out and secured some "risk capital" from private
foundations. We established the North Carolina Fund to make
grants to a few communities that were willing to pull together
their leaders, to sit down and define the problems faced by those
living in poverty, and to work together to find ways in which
these people could be helped to break out of the cycle of pov-
erty. Our hunch was that we could not help people help them-
selves if the community did not focus its health, education,
welfare, housing, and employment resources in their support.
Mr. President, we announced that we could help about ten
communities launch an experimental program. We asked which
communities were interested. In response to the invitation,
thousands of North Carolinians— public officials, civic leaders,
and representatives of those who needed help— sat down to take
hard looks at their communities. The measure of the heart and
conscience of this state lies in the fact that the North Carolina
Fund received fifty-one proposals, involving sixty-six of our 100
counties. They came from the Mountains, from the Coastal
Plain you are now visiting, and from the cities in our Piedmont.
The North Carolina Fund's limited moneys will enable a few
communities, representing a good cross section of the state, to
start these action programs immediately. But in all of these
counties, and more, we have the people and the leadership who
already have done the type of thinking that you asked for under
Public Addresses and Summaries
427
Title II of the Economic Opportunity Act. These communities
are ready to go to work.
We have an excellent example in the community you are vis-
iting today. Nash and Edgecombe counties are in the midst of a
prosperous agricultural area, specializing in tobacco, cotton, corn,
peanuts, and lumber. More than 30 per cent of the residents of
these counties work on farms. In Rocky Mount and the sur-
rounding towns you will find tobacco processing industries as
well as textile and furniture manufacturing.
The median family income in this area is about $3,000, which
is not bad on the average for a farm area. But I am suspicious
of averages. I look beyond them to see not only the prosperous
farmer with a higher than average income, but also the farmer
who has been made obsolete by the tractor and the mechanical
cotton harvester. I see the tenant farmer who has little education
and a large family. He makes a bare living but his children find
no hope on the farm. I see the families who, in rural and urban
areas alike, never have been able to break out of poverty. I see
the father who migrates to the city with no skills and no educa-
tion with which to compete for skilled employment.
This picture is what the leaders in Nash and Edgecombe
counties and the city of Rocky Mount saw as vv^ell. They were
not content with a community where an increasing stream of
tenant farmers moved to town equipped with less than five
years of education. They were not content to mechanize the
farm and neglect the displaced sharecropper and laborer.
For more than a year the leaders in these two counties have
been working on a community action plan. With state help
they are establishing an industrial education center. They have
worked hard to open up new job opportunities. And they have
submitted a comprehensive plan to the North Carolina Fund—
a package of projects— intended to help children and their par-
ents overcome the burdens of poverty. They want to help erase
illiteracy, provide job training, improve the education of dis-
advantaged children, and strengthen the family and the home
environment.
The North Carolina Fund has responded by selecting Nash
and Edgecombe counties as a site for one of seven comprehen-
sive, experimental programs to be supported by the fund during
the next four years.
Mr. President, I want to ask Mr. W. W. Shaw,^^^ as chairman,
and the members of the Nash-Edgecombe Area Steering Com-
William W. Shaw (1903- ), bank president; insurance company presi-
dent, business and civic leader, musician from Rocky Mount. Powell, North Caro-
lina Lives, 1095-1097.
428
Papers of Terry Sanford
mittee on the North Carolina Fund to stand as I present to you
a copy of their plan for action. This plan is not yet a complete
blueprint. But with this dynamic leadership we are confident
we will find here some answers for eastern North Carolina.
You can see that with our private, limited funds, we can work
on not more than about 10 per cent of our opportunities. I think
we have demonstrated that the people will respond, but I think
also we have demonstrated that we cannot complete the job, and
cannot reach all of our possibilities, without the co-operation of
the government. The local people will provide the leadership,
but they need financial support.
I know that the leaders in these counties and in all our coun-
ties are very hopeful that the federal poverty legislation soon
will pass the Congress. They have provided the type of thinking
you have asked for in Title II of that legislation. They recognize
that no program aimed at the complex problems of poverty will
get the job done without a partnership between the community,
the state, and the federal government. I must add, also, that all
other sections of your program, now pending in Congress, will
support the purposes of this community effort.
Mr. President, again I welcome you. I wish that we had more
time to show you all that we are doing in North Carolina. We
are glad that you could come to a community that is typical of
a desire throughout this state to marshal all our resources, with
imagination and intelligence, so that today's children of poverty
will not become tomorrow's parents of poverty.
STUDENT ACTIVITIES BANQUET
Raleigh
May 12, 1964
Speaking at the Erdahl-Cloyd Union of North Carolina State,
Governor Sanford referred to the state-wide leadership furnished
by this university and its related branches. He commented that
division within the consolidated university had to end and that
there must be a unified effort to build a university comparable to
the best in the nation. Consolidation had brought benefits to the
state as a whole. Sanford remarked that the purpose of the univer-
sity was to educate men and women and to give each individual
the opportunity for a fuller life while at the same time giving the
state and its citizens a richer future. The university, with its three
branches— Chapel Hill since 1795, Raleigh since 1887, and Greens-
S 3 i^.
Public Addresses and Summaries
429
boro since 1891— had been doing this. The university was owned
by the citizens of North CaroHna, including those who never had
the opportunity to study at any of its branches. The Governor
observed that a diploma represented achievement but it also
represented a debt to the faculty and administration and trustees,
to parents, and to all citizens of North Carolina.
JOHN F. KENNEDY MEMORIAL TRIBUTE
Chapel Hill
May 17, 1964
[North Carolina citizens paid tribute to the late President Kennedy in a
spring memorial program held at Kenan Stadium in Chapel Hill and by a
significant monetary contribution toward the John F. Kennedy Library. In
a state-wide effort to sell 23,000 tickets at 1 10.00 each, North Carolina was
the first state to conduct its campaign for contributions to the library. Mrs.
Joseph P. Kennedy and Senator Ted Kennedy were present for the addresses
by Dr. Billy Graham, noted North Carolina evangelist, and Secretary of
Commerce Luther Hodges. At the conclusion of the program, Mrs. Kennedy
accepted the check for the state's donation toward the library. The remarks
of presentation by Governor Sanford marked the solemnity of the occasion.]
Mrs. Kennedy^ Ladies and Gentlemen:
This is a service in tribute,
on one Sunday afternoon, c
in one American state.
But North Carolinians,
and other free people,
and freedom loving people
around the globe, in all places,
will always remember
President John Fitzgerald Kennedy.
This tribute today is our tangible contribution
to a place of memory.
But the memory of John Kennedy
Will never be housed in a single place;
Because his resolute and honest expression
of American aspirations for mankind,
and belief in man,
restored the hopes of men and women
430
Papers of Terry Sanford
on this side and beyond all the curtains of the world
that indeed
in the last half of the twentieth century
to the benefit of all peoples
We could "invoke the wonders
of science instead of its terrors."
Because no man in American history better demonstrated
to other countries
the goodness and high purpose of the American dream;
And because no man has surpassed
his steadying and reassuring influence
on a shaken world;
Because of these and many other things
The memory of John F. Kennedy
will be housed in the minds and hearts
of every nation
as long as man is free
as long as men hope to be free.
Therefore, on behalf of almost five million
North Carolinians, I am happy to present
a token of our admiration of President
John F. Kennedy to his mother,
Mrs. Joseph P. Kennedy, and to
present to our people a very
remarkable mother,
Mrs. Kennedy.
FARM-INDUSTRY DAY
WOODLEAF
May 19, 1964
Speaking at Farm-Industry Day in Woodleaf, Sanford said
education, business, and agriculture were "the three basic num-
bers to the combination to unlock the future of North Carolina."
The state had set the pace in education, and Sanford referred
to 1961 and 1963 accomplishments. After discussing programs
in the field of education, he discussed industry and cited statistics
to show advances in that area. He hastened to say that industry
Public Addresses and Summaries
431
included agriculture and that North Carolina was "planning to
plant and not to foreclose its farms." Though doubt had been
expressed in the past when rural roads were paved, those roads
proved to be roads to prosperity. The Governor also praised
state employees for their efficiency, saying that North Carolina
was forty-eighth in the nation in the number of state and local
government employees in comparison with the population. Sta-
tistics showed that "North Carolina is both fiscally sound and
forward hound."
STATE DEMOCRATIC CONVENTION OF 1964
Raleigh
■ May 20, 1964
[Sharing the platform with Governor Sanford at the 1964 State Demo-
cratic Convention was Senator Hector MacLean of Lumberton who gave
the keynote address. The Governor's speech, in which he reviewed accom-
plishments of the Democratic party and voiced confidence in it, set the tone
for an enthusiastic, harmonious convention.]
This administration is concerned with people and with giving
them a chance to do better than they have before. This is the
way to develop the economy. This is the way to develop free
enterprise. This is the way to develop democracy. And we are
determined to promote that concern with the greatest possible
efficiency and the lowest possible cost. The record shows that
the Democratic party has done just that.
This Administration has spent much money and it is glad of it. It un-
doubtedly appears cheaper to neglect the aged, the feeble, the infirm, the
defective, to forget the children of this generation, but the man who does
it is cursed of God and the state that permits it is certain of destruction.
There are people on the face of the earth who take no care of the weak
and infirm, who care nought for their children and provide only for the
gratification of their own desires, but these people neither wear clothes nor
dwell in houses. They leave God out of consideration in their estimate of
life, and are known to us as savages.
These words are highly appropriate today, but they were
delivered by Governor Charles Brantley Aycock sixty years ago
at the State Democratic Convention of 1904.
The Republicans said Charles Brantley Aycock would bank-
rupt the state with his education program. They said Cam Mor-
rison would bankrupt the state with his good roads program in
the twenties. They said Angus McLean and Max Gardner would
432
Papers of Terry Sanford
ruin us with money put in colleges and the university. They were
certain that Kerr Scott was bankrupting the state with his farm-
to-market roads in the forties. They said Luther Hodges had
grifters and grafters milking the state dry in the fifties.
Like every other Democrat here today, I am proud to be in
company with men like Aycock, Morrison, McLean, Gardner,
Scott, and Hodges, and to have the Republicans accusing me
like they did other Democratic governors of this century.
After sixty-three years of this kind of Democratic "spending"
and "bankruptcy," do you know how North Carolina's credit
rating stands? Any investment broker can tell you. After sixty-
three years of Democratic government. North Carolina's credit
rating stands Triple A. That's where it stands today!
North Carolina ranks forty-eighth among all the states in the
union— third from the bottom— in the number of state and local
governmental employees. North Carolina ranks second from the
very bottom in the per capita expenditures for state and local
governmental services. We provide the services but we don't
waste money in doing it.
North Carolina does not operate with deficit budgets. Red
ink in the budget-making process of North Carolina is illegal
and it is unheard of.
But this frugality is not achieved at the expense of essential
services. As Aycock enjoined the Democrats of 1904, we do care
for the aged. We do care for the feeble. We do care for the
infirm, both the mentally and physically ill. We do care about
more jobs and better pay. We do, above all else, care for our
children, and we are willing to invest our tax money in their
future. In 1964 we do follow the principles of Charles Aycock
of 1904 and of Thomas Jefferson of 1804. We agree with Jeffer-
son that "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state
of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
Democrats in Raleigh and in Washington do care about the
causes of poverty. Democrats under Franklin D. Roosevelt cared
and Democrats under John Kennedy cared and Democrats under
Lyndon Johnson care.
The Democratic party always has been, is now, and always
will be a party that cares for the weak, the infirm, the young,
and the old. It will always be the party that looks for better
opportunities for all the people.
It is a party that faces the future without fear; it is a party
that votes yes to the future. That is why the people of this state
will vote Democratic to keep progress flowing from the State
Capitol and from the White House this year.
And that is why North Carolina and the Democratic party
Public Addresses and Summaries 433
will continue to look to the future and work for the future— in
1964 and in 1965 and all the years ahead.
TESTIMONY, SPECIAL APPALACHIAN COMMITTEE
OF THE HOUSE PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
Washington^ D. C.
May 22, 1964
The Governor testified in support of House Bill 11065, con-
cerning the Appalachian region. He explained that only 20
per cent of North Carolina's population was in this area and
that North Carolina had only 6 per cent of those included in
the Appalachian region as defined by the bill, but that the group
was significant. The people of the area received the same services
as those of other sections of North Carolina, which meant that
the state put a disproportionately high share of money into the
region because of the great difficulties and high costs. The people
of western North Carolina had taken steps to remedy the situ-
ation in various ways. Outdoor dramas, such as Unto These
Hills, had attracted tourists. The Western North Carolina
Associated Communities, which sponsored the drama, also found-
ed the Western North Carolina Regional Planning Commission
which had made an economic analysis of the western part of the
state and had outlined a development program. A development
association in eleven counties in northwestern North Carolina
and the Asheville Agricultural Development Council had both
contributed to the welfare of the area. Sanford mentioned poor
access in the area as a major problem. Though North Carolina
ranked third in the percentage of highways paved, there was still
not enough money. Roads had been built where traffic pressure
was the greatest; the highway portion of the bill was, therefore,
imperative for the North Carolina mountain section. North
Carolina would raise matching funds, but help was needed to
carry out all of the programs which had to be carried out to
enable the region to be revitalized. Governor Sanford promised
that investments made by federal and state governments would
be returned many times over.
434
Papers of Terry Sanford
COMMENCEMENT EXERCISES OF 1964
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL
Chapel Hill
June 1, 1964
Speaking to the 1964 graduates of the University of North
Carolina at Chapel Hill, Governor Sanford did not give the
usual commencement address. He reviewed the history of the
university in some detail, reminding the graduates of the sacri-
fices made throughout its history by many dedicated citizens of
North Carolina. He discussed the role of the school, pointing
out its common functions shared with other great institutions
of learning, but adding that the Chapel Hill school also had
distinctive qualities. He praised the university for furnishing
"creative, courageous leaders in virtually every area of endeav-
or. ..." Sanford praised it also for its leadership in solving
problems of each succeeding generation and for being the "chief
instrument for the progress of North Carolina." Not only had
the university served the past; it was serving the present genera-
tion. With so many roles to perform, some criticism was to be
expected; to meet the criticism, it ^vas imperative that the insti-
tution remain in full and constant communication with the
people of North Carolina. Sanford reminded the audience that
the school could not exist in "sterile scholasticism. . . ." In dis-
cussing some of the problems facing the university from within,
the Governor said that the needs of the entire state had to be
considered; competent faculty had to be recruited; the problem
of how to provide excellent teaching and creative research had
to be solved, though the necessity of good teaching had always to
be given priority. The state had problems facing it, and the
university would continue to provide leadership to meet those
problems. Sanford closed with quotations from Archibald D.
Murphey and Harry Woodbum Chase concerning the mission
of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
REPORT TO GOVERNORS CONFERENCE
Cleveland, Ohio
June 8, 1964
[The Sheraton-Cleveland National Hotel in Cleveland, Ohio, was the
scene of this annual Governors Conference. Governor Sanford discussed
the report of the Interim Study Committee on Federal Aid to Education
Public Addresses and Summaries
435
with those in attendance. While not offering any ready answers to the prob-
lem of federal aid to education, recognition was given to the complexities
involved, and the way was paved for objective thinking and valid decisions
in the future.]
The great historian Edward Gibbon summarized one period
as follows:
The reign of Antonius is marked by the rare advantage of furnishing very
few materials for history; which is indeed little more than the register of
the crimes, follies and misfortunes of mankind.
On the other hand, Herbert George Wells, the noted British
novelist and historian, concluded, "Human history becomes
more and more of a race between education and catastrophe."
Our own Henry Adams said, "Practical politics consists in ig-
noring facts."
With that prelude, I propose that we, a group of practical
politicians, shall in the next fifteen or twenty minutes summarize
and consider almost two hundred years of the facts of educational
history.
I was very happy when our Chairman, Governor Anderson,
and the Executive Committee agreed to appoint an Interim
Study Committee on Federal Aid to Education. Education is the
largest single area of governmental expenditure in our states.
In the average state in 1961, 36.6 per cent of all state and local
revenues were expended for education. Needless to say, a pro-
gram of this magnitude is of importance to all of us.
There are shortcomings in American education and many
soft spots which need to be firmed up. Whether the federal
government should take a more meaningful part is the object
of this discussion, but regardless of what the federal government
does, or what the governors might ultimately recommend that
the federal government do, the states have a challenging obli-
gation. There is much to be done, regardless of how the finan-
cial burden is shared.
We have been too long in determining how we should pro-
ceed. We have been too long in waiting, in some places, for the
federal government to act, and, in some other places, of simply
failing to take necessary action. If federal participation in edu-
cation is to remain at its present level, or if federal participation
is to be reduced in any area, then all the more strongly must
the states step up to meet educational needs.
A strong educational system is vital to us as individuals, as
states, and as a nation. The educated individual can live a fuller
and more meaningful life in that he will be better able to sup-
port himself and contribute to the social, political, and economic
436
Papers of Terry Sanford
welfare of the nation. All of our states are competing with one
another to develop industry and increase the income of our
people. A strong educational system is necessary to provide the
skilled labor force which industrialization requires. An educated
citizenry will also enable our states to gain the maximum in
social progress from whatever economic advance we achieve.
Finally, education is essential to national survival in these pro-
longed years of cold war. The productive potential which we
require to remain strong cannot be achieved without education.
Perhaps most important of all, the quality of statesmanship nec-
essary to preserve the peace in these troubled times can be
developed only through liberal education.
The public schools are a state-local partnership in every state,
although the relative importance of the partners varies from
state to state. At the two extremes, the state of Delaware pro-
vides over 81 per cent of the cost of local schools, and Nebraska
furnishes 6 per cent. This comparison serves merely to illustrate
the diversity of arrangements for education in our states. Each
of us, I am sure, has had experience in this state-local partner-
ship. In many of our states, the state education association is
quite able to make its influence felt in public affairs.
We sometimes ignore the third partner in the education en-
terprise: the federal government. Activity of the federal govern-
ment in education actually began with the federal land grants
which preceded the ratification of our present constitution.
Although no general federal aid bill has ever been enacted, new
programs of aid to specific educational activities have gradually
increased in number through the years.
Argument regarding the pros and cons of federal aid has been
fairly constant since the establishment of the land grant colleges
in 1862. I feel that one of the greatest contributions which our
Interim Study Committee can make is to describe the issues of
federal aid in a manner which will enable you to make your
own objective decisions regarding these questions. That is what
we have tried to achieve in the study which we place before you
today.
I suspect that the question of whether or not we should have
federal aid to education is almost moot by now. The federal
government in 1962 provided 19 per cent of the cost of all higher
education. This expenditure makes it almost an equal partner
with the state and with parents in the support of higher educa-
tion. True, much of this money was for contract research serv-
ices, but it still provided support of education, particularly at the
graduate level. The federal share in the public schools was less,
about 2 per cent, if the school lunch program is excluded. The
Public Addresses and Summaries
437
percentage ran much higher in states which have a great many
federal installations. School districts in these states obtain fed-
eral help in meeting school problems intensified by federal ac-
tivity.
The statement is often made that history repeats itself. This
has certainly been true in federal aid to education. Some national
crisis has repeatedly led to consideration of direct federal aid to
general education, opponents have been able to block the pas-
sage of general legislation, and a new program of special assist-
ance to education has been enacted as a solution, or partial solu-
tion, to the original problem.
The economic and social aftermath of the Civil War produced
a general federal aid debate which continued from 1870 to 1890.
During this period, the Senate passed federal aid bills on three
occasions and the House once. Never, however, was the concur-
rence of both houses obtained. The passage of the Second Morrill
Act in 1890, providing continuing appropriations to support
agricultural, mechanical, and military education in the land
grant colleges, closed this period of debate. Congress then turned
its attention to support of vocational education at the secondary
level.
The rate of selective service rejections in World War I, result-
ing from illiteracy and physical defects which could have been
remedied if discovered in school, again created a demand for
general aid. This debate was to continue from 1918 through
1925. Another proposal in 1929 would have provided direct
assistance to education in rural areas. The depression intervened
and necessitated emergency federal aid to the schools, as well as
as giving renewed emphasis to demands for more permanent fed-
eral support. Federal aid bills were continuously before the Con-
gress through 1939. The Lanham Act was passed in 1940 to pro-
vide some assistance to school districts affected by expanding
federal activity.
World War II, starting in 1941, again brought to light illiteracy
and remedial physical defects, as well as deficiencies in technical
education. A critical teacher shortage developed and lasted
through the 1940's. General federal aid remained a lively issue
until the defeat of the Taft bill in 1949. In 1950 Public Laws
815 and 874 were enacted to provide federal assistance for both
school construction and current operating expenses in districts
affected by federal activities.
The baby boom of the 1950's and the suburban dispersal of
population continued to present serious educational problems.
Proponents of federal aid shifted their approach to a quest for
school construction aid, in an effort to avoid the bitterness of the
438
Papers of Terry Sanford
religious issue, as it had manifested itself in 1949. School con-
struction aid was the issue through 1957.
The successful launching of the Russian Sputnik on October
4, 1957, focused the attention of the American people, as never
before, on education. The result was the enactment in 1958 of the
National Defense Education Act, providing an extensive program
of federal support, both of higher and secondary education, pri-
marily, but by no means exclusively, in the fields of science and
modern languages.
The continuing cold war emphasizes the importance of edu-
cation to our national survival. Both houses of the Congress
passed federal aids bills in 1960, and the Senate passed a bill in
1961. This period of struggle reached a climax in 1963. General
federal aid was decisively defeated. The Congress, however, en-
acted an unusually large number of categorical programs to meet
the needs of education. These included aid for construction of
higher education facilities, expansion of vocational education,
medical school construction, library services, and extensions of
the National Defense Education Act and the programs of aid to
federally-affected areas.
What are the issues which have prevented the enactment of
general federal aid legislation for almost a century? The major
points of controversy are fear of federal control of education,
treatment of private schools, and race relations. Some groups
have also exerted great influence with their contention that fed-
eral aid is unnecessary, and that education needs can be met by
state and local governments. Advocates of federal participation
also disagree among themselves as to the precise form it should
take.
The congressional hearings and debates are replete with
examples of speakers who listed a half dozen or more objections
and then concluded that the federal aid bill would provide aid
to parochial schools, would deny aid to parochial schools, would
result in integrated schools, would continue segregated schools,
or would bankrupt American business. This is not to say that
sincere state rights adherents and those who believe in local
school autonomy do not oppose federal aid on principle. They
have a lot of company, though.
The present programs of federal participation in education
have not resulted in overt federal control of curriculum, employ-
ment of teachers, choice of textbooks, or general school adminis-
tration. Such programs have, of course, influenced the adminis-
tration of local schools and institutions of higher education by
causing changes in program emphasis. Without the federal pro-
grams, I doubt that we would have as many courses in vocational
Public Addresses and Summaries
439
education, the sciences, or military subjects. These changes in
emphasis, however, are in accord with national goals as defined
by the Congress.
Although precise policy positions have been modified from time
to time, the Catholic Church has consistently opposed federal
aid proposals which did not include assistance for private schools.
Protestant groups have as consistently opposed direct aid to
parochial schools. Private schools are eligible under several of
the present federal programs, perhaps the most significant being
the Higher Education Facilities Act of 1963. Current efforts at
a solution to the religious issue lie in the areas of defining and
assisting secular elements of private school education and in the
construction of "shared time" facilities, which could be used by
both public and private school pupils in an area.
The major issue dividing federal aid advocates has been that
of flat grants versus equalization of educational expenditures and
program. Many northern congressmen favor flat grants in which
their states would share. Most southern and western congressmen,
who accept the principle of federal aid, prefer equalization grants
which could be used to bring educational expenditures in their
states closer to the national norms. Most bills have contained some
combination of flat grants and equalization payments, in an
effort to obtain enough votes for passage.
This treatment of the facts of federal aid to education has, of
necessity, been sketchy. I hope it serves to introduce the report
now before you. As you have seen, the issues of federal aid are
not simple.
In the words of the Woonsocket, South Dakota, News:
People come in three classes: the few who make things happen, the many
who watch things happen, and the overwhelming majority who have no
idea what happened.
As the governors of our respective states, and as a conference,
we have a responsibility to "make things happen" in this area so
vital to all of us. I have not attempted to give you the answers
today, not even my answers, but we owe the quest for them to our
people, to our states, and to our nation.
NORTH CAROLINA ASSOCIATION
OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
MoREHEAD City
June 15, 1964
In his address to county commissioners. Governor Sanford
440
Papers of Terry Sanford
stressed the importance of state-county co-operation. He said his
administration had worked well with counties; that new in-
dustry had meant new jobs, resulting in an increase in the tax
base; that the 1961 program for improvement in the public
schools was a giant step forward and that during that same year,
fifty-two counties had increased their support to the schools; that
in the next three years over eighty counties had given increased
support to schools, and that this co-operation was beneficial to all
children. The educational program and its support had drawn
national attention, and the Governor stressed the importance of
continuing it. Sanford continued with brief comments on wel-
fare programs, the need for additional hospital care for older
people, and the vital necessity of breaking the cycle of poverty so
as to prevent the need for welfare assistance. Before closing he
made several statements concerning roads in the state. He also
urged the continuation of research in the light of the tobacco
health scare and asked that price-support programs be continued.
After discussing these several areas of mutual concern, he told
the commissioners that North Carolina had a challenge to show
the rest of the nation "how to go about building the Great
Society."
AMERICAN SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA LEAGUE
AND COMMUNITY ARTS COUNCILS
Detroit, Michigan
June 20, 1964
[In his address to two national cultural organizations, Governor Sanford
reviewed the cultural progress made in North Carolina, beginning with
events of the sixteenth century. He painted a bright picture for the state's
future and in so doing, defended state support of the arts.]
I am particularly happy to talk to you tonight about state
support of the arts— specifically North Carolina's role— for two
reasons. First, I think the proper relation of a governmental
unit to the arts is generating much discussion, even controversy,
at the present time. This is true, whether the city, state, or
federal government is involved.
Second, I think this will be the first time that the role North
Carolina has played in fostering the arts has even been fully
and publicly told.
It was in 1780, while he was in Europe as Minister Pleni-
Public Addresses and Summaries
441
potentiary negotiating treaties o£ peace and commerce with
Great Britain, that John Adams wrote to his wife:
I could fill volumes with descriptions of temples and palaces, paintings,
sculpture, tapestry, porcelain, etc., if I could have the time, but I could not
do this without neglecting my duty. My duty is to study the science of
government that my sons may have the liberty to study mathematics and
science. My sons ought to study geography, navigation, commerce and agri-
culture in order to give their children a right to study philosophy, painting,
poetry, music, architecture, sculpture, tapestry and porcelain."
Today, we are several generations past John Adams' grandsons,
and I think we are doing much to fulfill his prophecy.
North Carolina, although not many people may realize it, has
an artistic tradition that can be traced back to 1585, when John
White came over to Roanoke Island with the ill-fated Lost
Colony. While he was in the colony, before he returned to
England to get desperately needed supplies, he did numerous
water colors of the area, including the Indians, birds, animals,
fishes, and reptiles that he encountered.
From these paintings, a series of engravings was made in 1590.
They remain today the classic illustrations of sixteenth century
America. The paintings themselves disappeared until they were
discovered in 1865 in the library of an Irish nobleman. The
following year they were acquired by the British Museum.
Now, I am happy to say that these paintings have been made
available to the public after ten years of work by the University
of North Carolina Press and the British Museum in facsimile
reproductions of all the surviving White paintings. Only several
months ago the first set was presented to the White House by the
state of North Carolina.
If some of the first art in America was created on the coast of
North Carolina, some of its first chamber music was written in the
Piedmont area, in Salem, the Moravian settlement that is now
a part of Winston-Salem. There in 1789 John Frederick Peter
composed a half dozen quintets that are still played today and
have been recorded. Peter was only one of a group of composers
who provided music for Old Salem, its Collegium Musicuum
and its church. Today, the Moravian Music Foundation in
Winston-Salem is hard at work getting this music out of the
archives and having it published for modern performance.
Back on the seacoast at Wilmington, the Thalian Association
was organized in 1788 and is the oldest Little Theater organi-
zation in the United States. It presents its plays today in a theater
that was built in 1858, on the site of an even earlier theater.
I would not be so rash as to say that North Carolina's modern
artists, writers, and composers come from direct lines that extend
back to 1585, or even the eighteenth century. What I do mean
442
Papers of Terry San ford
to say is that North Carolina has long provided fertile soil for
our artists, composers, writers, and musicians, and it continues to
do so today. Nor would I say that the state of North Carolina
itself has always been the patron of the arts that it is today. But
I do say that without this tradition, I am sure it would have been
much more difficult, not to say impossible, to get our legislators
to appropriate money for things cultural. This they have done
willingly these past few decades.
Perhaps North Carolina's most spectacular venture into the
arts was made in 1947, when the General Assembly appropriated
|1 million to establish a State Arts Museum on the condition
that the North Carolina State Art Society secure an equal amount
to be added to the original grant. The S. H. Kress Foundation of
New York, as a part of its program of establishing galleries
throughout the United States, pledged a collection of art of a
value to be as least $1 million. The state then provided and reno-
vated a four-story building. On April 6, 1956, the North Carolina
Museum of Art opened its doors, and North Carolina became the
first state to set aside public funds to found a state art collection.
Today, the North Carolina Museum of Art boasts a collection
of more than 1,000 works of art valued in excess of |7.5 million.
State support of the museum continues at the rate of some
1 150,000 a year. Since this sum is hardly enough to provide money
for acquisitions, the museum depends on donations of art. North
Carolina residents, foundations, and businesses have been most
generous.
One of the more intriguing plans to get art for the museum was
organized last year in Winston-Salem, when a Collectors' Choice
Show was sponsored by local citizens. Fine works of art were
selected from many New York galleries and displayed at the
Forsyth County-Winston-Salem Library. All the works were for
sale, either for the purchaser's own collections or for gifts to the
museum. The museum was assured that the donated art would
be acceptable because the director passed on each painting and
sculpture before it was sent to the exhibit. As a result of this
project, some truly fine art valued at more than $300,000 now
graces some North Carolina homes, as well as the walls of the
State Art Museum.
If there is one art that is indigenous to North Carolina, it is
probably the symphonic drama. To tell the story of the first
British colony in America, which so mysteriously disappeared
nearly four hundred years ago, Paul Green, North Carolina's
"2 Paul Eliot Green (1894- ), professor and playwright from Chapel Hill;
alumnus of the University of North Carolina and Cornell; Pulitzer Prize winner
in 1927 for his play, In Abraham's Bosom. Powell, North Carolina Lives, 511.
Public Addresses and Summaries
44S
own Pulitzer Prize-winning playwright, wrote The Lost Colony. It
was produced in 1937 on Roanoke Island, the very site of the
colony. The Lost Colony is running today, as it has every sum-
mer since 1937 with the exception of the war years. The Lost
Colony, and the others which have followed in its wake, com-
bine drama, music, dancing, and spectacle. The association which
produces The Lost Colony has had its vicissitudes. It is not a
money maker, but rather a labor of love. While the weather gen-
erally has been good to it— surprisingly few performances have
been rained out over the years— a hurricane did sweep away the
waterfront theater one time. It has since been rebuilt better
than ever.
While a quasi-private organization is responsible for pro-
ducing The Lost Colony, the state of North Carolina, recognizing
it as not only a cultural asset but a tourist attraction as well, has
underwritten it and since 1947-1948 made small grants to it to
insure its continuation. These grants in recent years have
amounted to no more than $10,000 annually.
The success of The Lost Colony has led to many other outdoor
dramas throughout the country, as well as in North Carolina.
Horn in the West, at Boone in the mountains of western North
Carolina, has received state financial help over the years. Unto
These Hills, the Cherokee story told right in the Cherokee
country of western North Carolina, is the most successful of them
all. It actually makes a profit, and although state funds helped
get it on its feet, it now needs no state financial help.
Because the interest in the symphonic drama is so widespread,
and because the main source of know-how in producing these
dramas is located in North Carolina, the Outdoor Drama Institute
was founded at the University of North Carolina in 1963. This
institute advises producers, waiters, directors, managers, and spon-
sors of outdoor dramas from all over the United States. I might
add that the institute is on friendly ground at the University of
North Carolina, since it is the home of the Playmakers, one of the
older and more famous college drama organizations.
Also in the field of drama, the Parkway Playhouse in Burns-
ville, a summer stock group, received a state subsidy. Although it
does not receive state money, the Flat Rock Playhouse at Flat
Rock has been designated by the legislature as the North Caro-
lina State Theater.
In order to bring good theater closer to young people, the state
and a private foundation joined forces in 1963 to finance a group
of touring professional actors who presented Shakespearean scenes
in schools throughout the state. This year, the state alone financed
444
Papers of Terry Sanford
a similar tour, as well as one by the Flat Rock Playhouse players,
who appeared in The World of Carl Sandburg. Sandburg, inci-
dentally, is a resident of North Carolina.
Nor has North Carolina neglected the films. In 1963 the North
Carolina Film Board was set up by this state with a grant of
money from the Richardson Foundation. This board produces
documentary films about the human, natural, and economic
resources of the state, and seeks to do the same type of work done
for Canada by the National Film Board of Canada. In fact, when
we set up the film board, we got the best man in the business
of documentary films to head it up. He is Jim Beveridge,^^^
formerly of the National Film Board of Canada. The first three
films have now been finished and several more are almost ready.
In the field of music. North Carolina has long been active. I
think most of you people here are well aware of the Brevard
Music Center, in western North Carolina, which was organized
and is run by one of your own well-known members, Jim
Pfohl.^^^ Over the years, the state has made financial grants to
Brevard.
But it is the North Carolina Symphony, founded in 1942 and
the first state symphony orchestra in the nation, that has probably
received more direct aid over a longer period of time than any
other group, with the exception of the museum. The North Caro-
lina Symphony and its Little Symphony tour the state giving both
adult and youth concerts. In 1963, for instance, they visited fifty-
two communities, and, under the conductor, Benjamin Swalin,
gave 125 concerts. Truly, no part of North Carolina is without
its opportunity to hear good music. Out of a budget of around
$200,000, the state provides $75,000 for the symphony.
There are other symphonies in North Carolina: in Charlotte,
Winston-Salem, Asheville, Greensboro, and the Triangle Little
Symphony of Raleigh, Chapel Hill, and Durham. These groups
are supported locally and do not receive state grants.
In 1963 North Carolina celebrated the tercentenary of the
grant of land by King Charles II of England. A commission to
plan the celebration was set up by the 1959 legislature. Naturally,
the celebration included a few speeches, and the issuance of a
stamp to commemorate the occasion, but the main emphasis was
on uncovering the heritage of North Carolina and on educating
James Beveridge, former producer and executive producer for the National
Film Board of Canada; experience in film-making in England and India; Director
of North Carolina Film Board while on two-year leave of absence from Canadian
Film Board. Statement of Governor Sanford of February 6, 1963.
James Christian Pfohl (1912- ), musician from Charlotte; student at Cin-
cinnati Conservatory of Music; founder and Director of Transylvania Music Center
at Brevard since 1936. Who's Who in America, XXXIII, 1580.
Public Addresses and Summaries
445
citizens of the state regarding the state's heritage. Prizes were
given in a literary competition for the best poem and the best
book written on the theme. An opera was commissioned, The
Sojourner and Molly Sinclair, composed by Carlisle Floyd;^^^ its
premier performance was conducted by Julius Rudel of the
New York City Opera Company. The leads were sung by Patricia
Neway and Norman Treigle, both members of that company.
The North Carolina Museum put on a large show of art of the
period; and a large trailer, containing an exhibit of state history,
toured the state.
No account of the arts in North Carolina would be complete
without a mention of another event, which I believe is unique.
That is what has come to be known as "Culture Week," cele-
brated annually in Raleigh, the capital, at the end of November.
Basically, "Culture Week" encompasses the annual meeting of
twelve state-wide cultural societies and organizations. These
groups meet to hear concerts and lectures and to award prizes and
scholarships to creative North Carolinians for painting, novels,
poetry, and works of nonfiction. Included in these groups are the
North Carolina Federation of Music Clubs, the North Carolina
Literary and Historical Association, the State Art Society, the
North Carolina Folklore Society, the North Carolina Symphony
Society, the North Carolina Society of Local and County His-
torians and others. While there is no state money involved in
the support of these organizations, they all have the blessing and
support of the state government, which takes a back seat in the
news during this one week.
North Carolina, with both state and private support, has
accomplished major restoration programs at Tryon's Palace, the
home of the Royal Governor of North Carolina, and at Old
Salem which was a well-established town when President George
Washington came through during his tour of the nation in the
eighteenth century. Our interest in history is also demonstrated
by our support of the North Carolina Department of Archives
and History— one of the outstanding agencies of its kind in the
nation.
And now I want to mention two things which are of particular
interest to me. These are two schools: one just now getting its
"^Carlisle Floyd (1926- ), composer of musical dramas; native of South
Carolina; 1956 winner of the New York Critics Award; composer of Susannah
and Passion of Jonathan Wade. News and Observer, September 15, 1963.
"^Julius Rudel (1921- ), Austrian-born conductor; with New York City
Opera since 1943; appointed General Director, 1957; recipient of various awards
for musical endeavors. Who's Who in America, XXXIII, 1731.
446
Papers of Terry San ford
second summer session under way; the other, in the planning
stage looking toward its opening in September, 1965. Several
years ago, while surveying the educational opportunities of North
Carolina, it was suggested to me that we should do something
extra for the gifted and talented students in North Carolina's
high schools. Out of these discussions came the idea of what was
later to be known as the Governor's School of North Carolina.
What we proposed to do was inaugurate a summer school for
400 of the state's most academically and artistically gifted students,
a school that would stretch the minds of these students, that
would develop their general and specific abilities, so that from
those gifted and talented youngsters would some day emerge
adults who would improve— by inventing, discovering, reasoning,
or reconstructing— our practical and aesthetic worlds.
With a grant of $225,000 from the Carnegie Corporation of
New York and a like sum from eleven foundations and industries
in Winston-Salem, the first session of the Governor's School was
held last summer on the campus of Salem College in Winston-
Salem. The students were chosen on the basis of recommen-
dations from their principals, or, in the case of the artistically
gifted students, on the basis of auditions. For eight weeks last
summer, these 400 students studied in one of the following fields:
English, foreign language, mathematics, natural science, social
science, art, choral music, instrumental music and piano, drama,
and dance. Eighteen of the students concentrated in art, thirty-
five in dance, t^\ enty-seven in drama, forty-one in choral music,
fifty-four in instrumental music, and five in piano. The others
were in the academic disciplines. Each student spent eighteen
classroom hours a week in his major interest area; three hours a
week in a minor area; and four hours a week in a class entitled
"Essential Ideas."
It ^vas a thrilling experience for these students, and for those
of us who were able to see these students in action in the seminar
rooms or on the stage or concert platform.
Under its present financial grants, the Governor's School is to
run for three years. We hope the school can be made a permanent
part of the state's educational structure, if tests we are making
sho^v we are accomplishing our aims.
The second school, of which I wish to speak and which I think
will be of some interest to you, is the North Carolina School for
the Performing Arts, which will open its doors, also in Winston-
Salem, in September, 1965.
The school was authorized by last year's session of the North
Carolina legislature, thus making possible a dream long held by
Public Addresses and Summaries
447
people like Jim Pfohl and Vittorio Giannini^^''^— who is scheduled
to be its first head. To this school will come students, not only
from North Carolina but from all over the Southeast. They will
receive academic instruction, and the very finest professional
training in their respective fields, whether it be music, drama,
or dance.
There is not another school exactly like this anywhere in the
country, although we would like it to be somewhat similar to the
High School of the Performing Arts in New York City. We realize
we are entering unchartered territory, but we have high hopes for
its success.
You might be interested to know how the school happened to
be located in Winston-Salem, already the home of the Governor's
School.
When the legislature authorized the establishment of the
school, it did not appropriate enough money to build a campus.
As a result, the school was offered to the city or town making the
most attractive proposition. The decision was made by the school's
advisory committee, among whose members are Peter Mennin,^^^
Agnes De Mille,^^^ Jose Limon,^^^ Paul Green, Julius Rudel,
Leontyne Price, Zelda Fichlandler,^^^ Sidney Blackmer,^^^ Eu-
genie Ouroussow,^^^ Frederic Franklin, Richard Adler,^^^ and
^"Vittorio Giannini (1903- ), composer, conductor, teacher from Pennsyl-
vania; scholarship student in Milan, Italy, in New York and Cincinnati; associated
with Transylvania Music Center at Brevard; chosen Director of the North Carolina
School of the Performing Arts, 1964. Who's Who in America, XXXIII, 732; Gov-
ernor Sanford's statement of May 13, 1964.
118 petei- Mennin (1923- ) , composer, music conservatory administrator from
New York; member of faculty, Julliard School of Music since 1947; Director of
Peabody Conservatory of Music; recipient of many national and international
awards. Who's Who in America, XXXIII, 1372.
119 Agnes De Mille, choreographer from New York; student, University of Cali-
fornia; student of dance, London; arranger of dances for Oklahoma, Carousel,
and Brigadoon; assisted in organization of London Ballet Company. John Parker
(ed.). Who's Who in the Theatre: A Biographical Record of the Contemporary
Stage (New York: Pitman Publishing Corporation [Twelfth Edition], 1957) , 440,
hereinafter cited as Parker, Who's Who in the Theatre.
Jose Limon (1908- ), concert dancer, choreographer, born in Mexico;
art and dance student in New York, 1930-1940; choreographer for various Broad-
way shows, 1933-1940; member of various college faculties in the dance depart-
ment. Who's Who in America, XXXIII, 1204.
Leontyne Price later declined the appointment.
Zelda Fichlandler later declined the appointment.
^Sidney Blackmer (1898- ), actor, native of Salisbury; law student at the
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; made stage debut in New York,
1917, film career, 1914. Parker, Who's Who in the Theatre, 284-285.
Eugenie Ouroussow, Director, School of American Ballet, New York City. In-
formation supplied by Bill Herring, School of the Performing Arts.
Frederic Franklin later declined the appointment.
^Richard Adler (1921- ), musical comedy writer from New York; member
of Dramatists Guild and American Guild of Authors and Composers. Who's Who
in America, XXXIII, 24.
448
Papers of Terry Sanford
Jan Peerce.^27 After a tour of the cities seeking the school, the com-
mittee recommended Winston-Salem. Winston-Salem offered the
school a whole high school campus, which the local school board
was planning to convert to other uses. But a million dollars was
needed to renovate the campus and add living quarters for the 400
students expected eventually to attend. In a three-day period a
group of the younger leaders in \Vinston-Salem raised more than
$900,000. Now AVinston-Salem, already a cultural center, will be
the home of the North Carolina School for the Performing Arts.
I have purposely ended my catalog of North Carolina's par-
ticipation in the state's cultural life with two examples of edu-
cation. AV^hen a state makes financial g^rants, it should, and often
must, justify its actions in the eyes of the people.
If I were called upon to justify North Carolina's participation
in the arts, I could easily do it on educational grounds alone. With
its financial help to arts, music, drama, and dance, as well as his-
toric restoration. North Carolina, I believe, is building an
audience that will in the future demand and get the finest in all
those fields.
The arts are supported in many ways at our state-supported
universities and colleges, but I haven't space to document these
expenditures.
North Carolina's participation in the arts is not that of direct
support of the artists themselves. Rather, North Carolina is, I
believe, creating a climate Tvhere the artist— amateur and pro-
fessional—in whatever field, can flourish.
Finally, I would say that most of North Carolina's participation
in the arts has come about because people at the local level have
demanded it. They are the ones who best see the cultural needs
of their communities and act to fill those needs. The state's role
is one of encouragement and some financial help where it is
needed. The financial help comes, not because the state wants
to force anything on the people, but only after the people have
asked for help.
I make no grandiose claims for North Carolina's participation
in the cultural life of the state. Other states have perhaps done
more. Certainly, others have done it differently. But our way, so
far, has suited us fine.
I kno^v that the state's participation is bound to increase over
the years. The forms it will take will probably be different from
those at present. But I can say that the climate of North Caro-
^^Jan Peerce (1904- ), operatic and concert tenor from New York; violinist
with dance orchestra, 1920-1932; performer in Radio City Music Hall, Carnegie
Hall, and the Metropolitan Opera; on radio broadcasts and recordings and in
numerous concert series. Who's Who in America, XXXIH, 1563.
Public Addresses and Summaries
449
lina— which is a moderate one any way you look at it— will be
healthy and progressive, whether you think of commerce, in-
dustry, tourism, or the arts.
DEDICATION OF
WAYNE COUNTY TECHNICAL INSTITUTE
GOLDSBORO
June 24, 1964
Speaking at the dedication of the Wayne County Technical
Institute, Sanford observed that an excellent place to see North
Carolina's constant need for improving education was at the air
base ii^ Goldsboro. To make planes fly took a lot of things, the
Goverrior said, but the main thrust of power was education. He
said that "Brain power has replaced back power as the number-
one need in our economy." Sanford then launched into a dis-
cussion of the necessity for quality education, saying that new
industry and new programs were assuring North Carolina's par-
ticipation in the space age and that these programs could not work
without educated minds. The Wayne County Technical Institute
was called an answer to poverty, near-poverty, and low income in
that it would provide adult education courses and vocational
training which would afford an opportunity for many to acquire
technical knowledge and skill. The age of automation required
change; facilities of the Goldsboro institution would help Wayne
County and North Carolina bridge the chasm of change.
DEDICATION OF STANLEY POWER TOOLS PLANT
New Bern
June 25, 1964
Since this event was being held in the home county of Conser-
vation and Development head, Robert Stallings, Governor San-
ford began his speech by acknowledging the work of this leader
and his department. He then spoke of eastern North Carolina's
great progress, saying the income of the area had increased by
$93,655,000 in new industrial salaries alone during the preceding
three and one-half years. Thanks to Stanley Power Tools and
other companies the potentials of North Carolina in general and
of the eastern section of the state in particular would be realized.
450
Papers of Terry Sanford
The Stanley company had joined others in this section for a
number of reasons: available resources; increased interest in
having industry; and work by local governments, the Chamber of
Commerce, and state agencies. Industrial growth came about also
because of attention paid to the things that counted most such as
education, the welfare of the people, and a heritage of historical
lore. This company was not the only one to realize what eastern
North Carolina had to offer in the way of industrial location.
From 1961 until May, 1964, 161 new plants and 297 expansions
of plants were organized in this area, representing investments of
$240,682,000 in new plants and $72,314,000 in expansion. After
reviewing further achievements and progress of North Carolina,
Governor Sanford closed by saying, "North Carolina is a good site
on which to manufacture and a good market in which to sell . . .
[but] most important of all, . . . [it] is a good place to live."
STATE-WIDE TELEVISION ADDRESS
ON POLITICAL CAMPAIGN
Charlotte
June 26, 1964
[Governor Sanford made it clear on a number of occasions that he in-
tended to stay out of active politics in the gubernatorial primaries at which
his successor would be nominated. Three contenders— I. Beverly Lake, Dan
K. Moore, and L. Richardson Preyer— conducted long and arduous cam-
paigns prior to the first primary. After Lake had been eliminated, the
second-primary contest between Moore and Preyer was nearing its close
when Sanford reversed his "no statement" policy and publicly endorsed
Richardson Preyer as the man he personally felt most capable of carrying
forward North Carolina's progressive programs.]
I haven't been taking an active part in this campaign, but I
don't think I would feel right about it five years from now, or
next year, or right now, if I didn't tell you how I feel about it, and
how I see what it will do to our future. After all, the people of
North Carolina have been pretty good to me, couldn't have been
better.
We have worked together in building a better state, in making
the improvement of our school system the wonder of the nation,
in making our state one of the most favored by industrialists look-
ing for new sites, in exhibiting an enthusiasm and excitement
about the things we can do, working together as the people of
North Carolina.
I don't mean you have all agreed with me all of the time. Of
Public Addresses and Summaries
451
course you haven't. I haven't agreed with myself some of the time.
But you have had the spirit and the willingness to believe that
North Carolina could be the best. Nobody could ask for any
more, and I am grateful.
I am not coming here tonight to tell you how to vote. Your
judgment is just as good as mine, and your combined judgment
is a whole lot better than mine. But since we have been so far
together, I want to tell you how I feel about this election— what
I think it will do to our future.
I have stayed out of any active part in the campaign, not
because I have been afraid to take a stand, not because I have had
the least doubt for the past three or four months about which
candidate could do the job that needs to be done.
I stayed out because I didn't see how I could get into day-to-day
debate, answering charges, clarifying misleading statements; in
effect, replying to those candidates who, it seemed, really wanted -
to argue with me rather shape up their own program.
I think they knew they had me at a disadvantage, and I made
the mistake of saying that I didn't intend to get into any argu-
ment, answer any charge, or get involved. This seemed to give
them their chance. They became more bold and stepped up their
charges, so day in and day out they hammered away at me.
My reasoning was that I had a job to do. For example, I
couldn't have cleared up the Chapel Hill demonstration situ-
ation if I had been burdened and saddled with day-to-day debate
about the next governor.
For another example, we were right in the middle of putting-
together the Learning Institute of North Carolina. You haven't
even heard much about this, but if you have got a boy or girl,
smart but not getting much out of school, if you have a child who
had trouble learning to read, if you are worried about your teen-
ager dropping out of school, then LINC will probably be the
greatest thing you have ever heard of. It is the first organization
of its type in America, bringing the best minds of our whole state
and country to bear on the problems of the schools and the
children.
This is an example of the kind of thing we have been trying
to do. You have seen other newspaper reports, almost every day,
about fresh ideas, new ideas, strong ideas, coming from people
all over the state and nation, which involve vocational education
in our high schools, preschool training for children from deprived
neighborhoods, new training programs in cold war citizenship
education for our social science teachers, programs in high schools
all across the state for the gifted student. These and many other
452
Papers of Terry Sanford
ideas will give boys and girls, all people, a better chance to get
ready, to grow stronger, to be able to build better. I would have
had to drop most of these things, at least de-emphasize them, if I
were going to spend several months to answer every campaign
charge, every political exaggeration.
I did suggest finally that I might save up all the charges and
answer them all at once, at the end of the campaign. Now it is the
end of the campaign, now I can answer them all, by saying that
they are all— you know it— politically inspired, and everybody will
have forgotten about them a month from now. I can answer by
saying that I have always, whatever the decision or the action,
tried to do what I thought would be best for the state and the
people, not only now, but ten years from now.
What worries me about all these charges is not that they have
been directed against me, but that it now becomes very difficult, if
not impossible, for those who have made those charges to serve
adequately as governor. They have condemned roundly almost
every program the people of the state now have going; they have
promised to change everything; they have actually said that
education no longer comes first in the budget, and that is the
main place it must come first— in the budget. It's easy to put it
first in other places. I know from firsthand experience, both in
the legislature and the Governor's Office, that if the governor
doesn't take a strong and determined position, the schools will
not make the progress that they must make if our state is to be
w^hat it must be and our boys and girls are to have the chance they
must have.
And frankly, I don't understand their criticism of our handling
of the difficult race situation, or their lack of appreciation for
the Good Neighbor Council, called by one national commen-
tator "the most creative approach in America." How then would
they do it? Of course, nobody is completely happy about the
situation, but we do not have closed schools as they do in Vir-
ginia communities where the Byrd plan was followed; we don't
have business afraid to come into the state as we have seen under
the Arkansas plan; we don't have bloodshed and violence and
riots and daily fear as they do under the Mississippi plan and
in some northern cities. What would they substitute for the
North Carolina plan? This might very well be the most important
issue of the campaign, and I think they have put themselves in
an impossible position to operate on the basis of fairness and
calmness, which are the keynotes of the North Carolina plan.
Why, also, would anybody want to upset our industrial develop-
ment? Along with a vigorous approach to our multitude of
tobacco problems, our creative food processing program, our
Public Addresses and Summaries
453
total assistance to the textile workers and industry— this is the
economic future of the people of our state. I have been thoroughly
berated about most of these things, yet only two or three weeks
ago, based on a national survey, Business Week Magazine found
that of all the fifty states. North Carolina was in the top five of
the states where industrialists from across the nation would
rather move new plants. We were the top in our region, with
no other state even close. Why would anybody want to tear up
this program, and what would they put in its place?
It's no wonder, then, that I want to talk with the people and let
them know what I feel. I think these are good programs. I want
to see them continued.
When I was a boy, every Sunday afternoon at Jack Roper's
farm, we used to have relay races. We drew two lines, one down
under a big oak tree at the end of the yard, and another line next
to the front porch. We picked our runners, and each man had to
run down, the front path to the far line and back, and then pass
the stick on to his teammate. Each man had to run his own race,
but the success of the team depended on how well each man ran.
I have been running as fast as I could and the best I could.
Here is one runner, however, who says, "Give it to me and I am
going to walk to the finish line. I don't like the way you have
been running. Look, you're out of breath. I'm going to walk, and
then I won't be out of breath, and besides, I won't take the
chance of stumbling." He may be right, but he wouldn't win for
us either. He wouldn't even get to the finish line, at least not in
time to make any difference. It is no wonder that I say, "Let's
don't use that kind of runner on our team. Let's give it to this
other runner, who says, 'Let me have it and I'll run faster and
better than you did.' "
That is the way I feel about this election. You, the people,
choose who will run your race. I am pleading that we let the
great race for progress in North Carolina be run by the candidate
who wants to run— not walk— and is willing to run hard, who wants
to win for North Carolina. My interest is not in personalities,
not in personal glory, not personal at all. It's certainly not in
political machines. In fact, it's a new experience for me to be
labeled as a political machine, because all of the time that I've
been working in politics, first for Kerr Scott and then in my own
election, I've been fighting what I thought was the old machine.
And now, suddenly, I'm supposed to have a machine of my own.
The truth of the matter is that one candidate has a group of loyal
supporters, and his opponent will always charge that he is run by
a machine.
Certainly there are people united behind each of these candi-
454
Papers of Terry Sanford
dates, and one group of supporters favors the programs I've been
talking about, and the other group does not. My interest is in
these programs. I think our future depends on them. I think
these programs are in danger unless ^ve have Richardson Preyer^^^
in there running hard for us.
I think with Judge Preyer ^ve have a man ^vho has the indi-
vidual wisdom to move us forward. I think ^vith Judge Preyer
we have the honesty and integrity to take the courageous action
and make the tough decision. I think in Judge Preyer we have
the boldness and the imagination to give us four years of exciting
and beneficial progress. At the end of his four years, I'm sure our
children will have a better chance to make something of them-
selves. I think we will have more jobs for our people. I think
our road system will be attracting even more industry because
it will be the best road system in America. I think our people will
be living in peace and not in a fearsome situation of extremists—
of citizen against citizen. I think our tobacco farmers will have
more security. I think our ^vorkers will have the better wages. I
think we will all be proud to be from North Carolina and that
people everywhere will be saying, "I wish ^ve could do things
like the people of North Carolina do them."
I believe this with all my heart, and I'm taking nothing away
from any other individual when I say for our times, for this point
in our developing history, for our own hopes and needs right
now, Richardson Preyer is the man we should choose.
You alone make the decision— you choose the runner. I have
one vote and I'm not telling you how to vote. But I'm saying,
please put in the man who is ndlling to run the race all of the
way.
STUDENT NEA NOTABLES DINNER
Seattle, Washington
July 2, 1964
Because of his intense interest in education, it was appropriate
that Governor Sanford deliver the notables dinner address at
the Student National Education Association convention. He
began with a discussion of the need of teachers to have concern
^^Lunsford Richardson Preyer (1919- ), lawyer and former United States
judge from Greensboro; alumnus, Princeton and Harvard; civic and educational
leader; unsuccessful candidate for the Democratic nomination for governor of
North Carolina, 1964. Who's Who in America, XXXIII, 1618; News and Observer,
June 28, 1964.
Public Addresses and Summaries
455
because progress in government, economic development, national
defense, and the world situation had to rely on education as a
foundation stone on which to build objectives. Educators were also
responsible for developing concern in public officials. Teachers
were called on to feel concern for every individual child; with-
out education, Sanford reminded the audience, a child was help-
less. North Carolina's story was then cited as illustrative of what
could happen when both educators and public officials were con-
cerned. The response of the General Assembly in providing
funds for advancement and the imaginative leadership on the part
of state leaders had combined to make for progress. Governor
Sanford outlined various programs which were being carried out
in North Carolina. After discussing these, he concluded that
the job was waiting to be done and that North Carolina would
proceed to do it.
DEMOCRATIC UNITY DINNER
Charlotte
July 31, 1964
[On June 27 Dan K. Moore was elected winner of the Democratic guber-
natorial nomination after a heated campaign prior to the second primary.
Governor Sanford, having publicly supported the losing candidate, stated
clearly that he would support the Democratic candidate in the November
election and urged all Democrats to back the choice of the party.]
Democrats:
I am for Dan Moore.^-^
I don't need to get united. I stay united in the Democratic
party. I stay united in the Democratic party, in rain or shine,
when we are in and when we are out.
I was Democratic, all the way, when Harry S. Truman and
Kerr Scott were our candidates. I don't regret that and I am proud
of it.
I was Democratic, all the way, when Adlai Stevenson and
William Umstead were our candidates. I don't regret that and
I am proud of it.
I was Democratic, all the way, when Adlai Stevenson and
Daniel Killian Moore (1906- ), lawyer, corporation official, former judge
from Canton; member of North Carolina House of Representatives, 1941; county
attorney, 1931-1943; Governor of North Carolina, January 1965—. Powell, North
Carolina Lives, 875; News and Observer, January 9, 1965.
456
Papers of Terry Sanford
Luther Hodges were our candidates. I don't regret that and I am
proud of it.
I was Democratic, all the way, when John F. Kennedy (along
with, I might add, another pretty good candidate) was our candi-
date. I certainly don't regret that, and all of North Carolina can
be proud of the fact forever that North Carolina went for John
Kennedy.
So, this year, I am Democratic, all the way, when Lyndon B.
Johnson and Dan K. Moore are our candidates. We can be proud
of that and we will never regret it.
North Carolina needs Lyndon B. Johnson. He is fair to all
people, not just to some of the people. He is firm with all nations,
but he holds up the true spirit of the United States of America.
He is sane and restrained, careful but determined, and while
from Texas, he knows that this is not the wild West and you
can't shoot 'em up just because you don't like them.
North Carolina is growing, going, moving upward, reaching
for new opportunities long held out of our reach by history. The
time is at hand when new jobs, new schooling, new advancements
are coming our way.
North Carolina cannot afford to have a national leader who
doesn't understand anything about the great American mechanism
except the rear view mirror and the brakes.
Now is our time, most of all in North Carolina, to look ahead,
plan ahead, move ahead. So we must have Lyndon B. Johnson.
And the Democratic party cannot fly on one wing. This is a
time for all who believe in the orderly progress the Democratic
party has brought to America to unite, across the board, up and
down, regardless of primary preferences, to go all the way for
all the Democrats.
Indeed, all the way is not enough. We need to go all the way
with Lyndon B. Johnson and Moore. And all the way with
Lyndon B. Johnson and Dan K. Moore is the only path for
those who believe in the Democratic party.
I renew my pledge to support all the way President Lyndon B.
Johnson and Dan K. Moore.
RALEIGH FOOD BROKERS DINNER
Raleigh
August 12, 1964
Sanford began with the comment that Raleigh, as the largest
food distribution center between Washington and Atlanta, was
Public Addresses and Summaries
457
an appropriate place to have a "kickoff" dinner for Food Brokers
Week. He said food processing had been stressed by his adminis-
tration, and he asked the group to marshal its resources behind
him. North Carolina had approximately 1,200 food processing
plants, employing 31,000 persons with an annual payroll in
excess of $147 million. The firms bought approximately $390
million worth of farm produce every year, and processors added
$350 million worth of value to the commodities before they were
sold. North Carolina's opportunity for additional food processing .
was great in that it did not produce enough to meet the demands
of the citizens. To help this situation a Department of Food
Science had been established at North Carolina State; a Food
Industries Section existed as part of the Division of Commerce and
Industry in 'the Department of Conservation and Development;
and the North Carolina Department of Agriculture was co-
operating in this field. The big need of existing food processors ,
was an adequate merchandising program. Sanford mentioned an
awards program which would recognize annually the merchant
doing the most to promote the use of North Carolina products.
He told the food brokers they held "the key that . . . [could]
unlock the gate to opportunity. ..."
PIONEER CORN COMPANY OPEN HOUSE
Laurinburg
August 29, 1964
Addressing the group attending the open house of the Pioneer
Corn Company, the Governor talked about agriculture, observ-
ing that it was likely to be overlooked in the scientific age. Science
and technology had been applied to the field of agriculture, which
was of vast importance to the Tar Heel state. Reviewing briefly
the historical developments which had occurred, the Governor
reminded those in attendance that at the beginning of the century
one farm worker produced a sufficient amount for seven people;
in 1963 the number had grown to twenty-three. Machinery,
fertilizers, marketing all played a part. The improvement in seed
had been spectacular, and the Pioneer Corn Company had had
a major role in the production and selling of hybrid corn in
twenty states. The company's twenty geneticists and fifty assist-
ants worked throughout the United States to achieve the breeding
of new and better hybrids. The Governor discussed in some detail
the history of the company and its achievements. He said that
458
Papers of Terry Sanford
North Carolina, too, worked in numerous ways to better agri-
culture, and he reminded his audience that farmers bought some
|9.7 million worth of seed each year, had almost |469 million
invested in tractors and $171 million in trucks, owned farm
equipment, bought fertilizer and liming material annually, pur-
chased feed for the dramatically increased number of livestock
they owned, and kept some $250 million in insurance in force.
The agricultural picture continued to change and improve.
Governor Sanford ended with the statement, "We are proud of
our heritage in agriculture and launch out confidently to a
greater harvest."
CARNEGIE AWARDS BANQUET
OF WINSTON-SALEM OPTIMIST CLUB
Winston-Salem
September 5, 1964
Labor Day week end was an appropriate time to consider the
never-ending job of reducing death, damage, and disability from
automobile accidents, the Governor told a Winston-Salem group
on September 5, 1964. The estimate was that twenty-two— more
than would die in Viet Nam battles— would be killed on North
Carolina highways. Deadly were the "High-powered cars and
low-conscious drivers." Race riots in Harlem, Rochester, and
Philadelphia produced headlines as to injuries and property
destruction. More people Avere killed and more property damage
was done by drivers, however, than by rioters. The Governor said
he hoped for the elimination of faulty safety equipment on cars.
The 1963 General Assembly adopted more safety legislation than
had been enacted in North Carolina since the coming of the
T-Model, but no provision was made for safety inspection. Despite
the stress on safe driving, the toll continued to mount. Sanford
expressed the opinion that ultimately a way would be found to
decrease wreckage on the highways, but the cure would be hard
because it had to be found in the drivers of the vehicles using the
roads.
DINNER HONORING THE DUKE ENDOWMENT
Charlotte
September 24, 1964
At a dinner honoring the Duke Endowment, Governor San-
Public Addresses and Summaries
459
ford said that James B. Duke regarded the Duke Endowment as
the outstanding achievement of his career. His second greatest
achievement, he felt, was the assembhng into the American
Tobacco Company of men able to operate successfully the large
companies resulting from the dissolution of the parent company.
The Duke Endowment had benefited all of North Carolina.
Appropriations to orphanages, hospitals, colleges, universities, and
industries had been made, resulting in better lives, finer leader-
ship, deeper Christian faith. Its contribution to education was of
particular interest. Three of the four educational beneficiaries of
the Duke Endowment were in North Carolina: Duke, Davidson,
and Johnson C. Smith University. They had received over $118
million of the $206 million distributed by the endowment since
its beginning. The Duke Endowment stood as a monument to
one of North Carolina's ablest men, the Governor told the group
in closing.
CAROLINA TEXTILES, INC., PLANT DEDICATION
Monroe
September 24, 1964 —
The Governor welcomed a company making quilts, sheets, and
35,000 other items, saying that population growth would mean
a greater demand for such goods. The company was cited as an
excellent example of the growth of industry in North Carolina,
but Sanford reminded the audience that a large proportion of
the "new" industry in the state was really an expansion of the
old. He said that the Department of Conservation and Develop-
ment had done much to encourage and assist business firms, that
conferences with buyers from the federal government had helped
establish the fact of what was needed, and that provision of
information concerning financing had also been of help. From
January, 1961, through June, 1964, over $1 billion was invested
in new plants in North Carolina. There were 624 "new" indus-
tries and 1,383 expansions of established ones, meaning a total
of almost 103,000 jobs as a result. Leading in the industrial
expansion was the textile industry, which was vital to North
Carolina's economy. Nearly half of all manufacturing employees
in the state were textile employees and one-fifth of all Tar Heels
depended on the textile industry for their economic well-being.
The textile industry paid more than $839 million each year in
wages in North Carolina. The new plant at Monroe ^vas part of
that growth and showed that the state's future was "limited only
460 Papers of Terry Sanford
by . . . vision for the future and . . . work to make that vision a
reality."
FORTY-SECOND ANNUAL
WESTERN DISTRICT NCEA MEETING
ASHEVILLE
September 29, 1964
The theme, 'Tducation for World Understanding," was called
an excellent choice by Governor Sanford, who felt that peace and
understanding could only come through education. He called
education "the foundation of economic opportunity . . . the foun-
dation of democrary . . . [and] the foundation of the needs and
hopes of the nation." He then discussed North Carolina's quality
education program, but he emphasized the incompleteness of the
program. He urged parents and educated leaders to vote for
bonds for needed classrooms, adding that the issues were non-
partisan. He cited statistics and facts to support his plea, pointing
out the necessity of classrooms "in which to teach our children
who will be the statesmen, the scientists, the industrialists and the
citizens of a free, prosperous, and peaceful world."
STATE-WIDE PLANNING MEETING
ON SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION
Raleigh
October 1, 1964
[The 1961 defeat of proposed bonds was not easily forgotten. After
approval by the General Assembly of a §100 million school bond issue,
nonpartisan forces went to work to convince the citizens of the need for an
affirmative vote when the bond election was held. The efforts of the Gov-
ernor and his supporters resulted in an overwhelming vote in favor of
the bonds of November 3.]
If there is a single theme that has run through the record of
North Carolina in the twentieth century, it has been that North
Carolinians are unafraid of the future.
The citizens of this state have never trembled at the future.
North Carolinians have never fallen faint at a challenge. And the
state of North Carolina has not shirked her duty to her posterity.
That is why I am confident that North Carolinians will vote on
Public Addresses and Summaries
461
November 3 for bonds to build the classrooms needed by the boys
and girls of this state.
If we are true to the record thus far achieved by our state in
this century, we can do no less.
At the very start of this century there were many arguments
against the building of public schools. There were many who
thought Charles Brantley Aycock was being overly optimistic
when he said North Carolina could provide universal public
education. But the overwhelming majority of the citizens of
North Carolina agreed with Aycock and built a school every
day of his administration.
In the twenties when the state was getting into the road-
building business, there were many who feared that Governors
Cam Morrison and Angus McLean were being unduly extravagant
by recommending multimillion dollar road-bond issues. But the
majority of the citizens of North Carolina determined that they / —
would link the county seats of our state. As a result we got a
running start throughout the nation and as a consequence North
Carolina has been known as the "good roads state" ever since.
In 1949 there were questions raised as to whether the road
bonds and the school bonds advocated by Governor W. Kerr Scott
would not bankrupt the state. The majority of North Carolinians
didn't share those fears. They voted for the Scott-tops and for the
new schoolrooms. As a result, North Carolina has reaped economic
and human benefits ever since.
In 1953 there were some who failed to see the need for the
bonds recommended by Governor William B. Umstead for build-
ing schools and mental hospitals. But the overwhelming majority
of North Carolinians agreed with Governor Umstead that this
state did need adequate classrooms and that we did need better
mental hospitals. And the majority of the adult citizens agreed
with Governor Umstead that we could afford those investments.
There are not many of you in this audience here today, and
there certainly are not many in the entire state of North Carolina,
who did not attend a public school that was built through a bond
issue— either a local bond issue or a state bond issue.
On November 3 the adult citizens of North Carolina will
determine if we want to risk as much for our children as our
fathers and grandfathers risked for us.
On November 3 we will have the opportunity of voting on a
$100 million program to build the schoolrooms which are so
badly needed across North Carolina.
It should be stressed that the state is not rushing into this
matter. When the public schools opened across our state earlier
this month, North Carolina needed more than 11,000 additional
462
Papers of Terry Sanford
new or renovated schoolrooms. The need is definite. The only
question that we face on November 3 is whether we will begin to
meet that need with state aid.
We know that if we want to provide our sons and daughters
with adequate educational facilities, we are going to have to build
these 11,000 schoolrooms.
There are many excellent reasons for our approval of this bond
issue.
We know that from an economic point of view this proposed
3100 million investment is a blue chip stock.
We know that North Carolina's credit rating ranks Triple A
on Wall Street— and you can't get any higher than that.
We know from past experience that money invested in the
education of our sons and daughters returns itself to the state's
economy many times over.
We know, as pointed out in the fact sheet prepared by Dr.
Charles F. Carroll, that the majority of classrooms built before
1930 are obsolete.
We know that many counties have reached or are approaching
the limit of their bonded indebtedness. And this includes the
large, well-to-do counties as well as the small ones.
We know that we have a mobile population and that the popu-
lation of the state is shifting, thus creating additional school needs
in various parts of our state.
Another reason that we need to approve this bond issue is the
fact that many of our current classrooms are overcrowded.
Teachers presently have too large a number of pupils to give
adequate attention to individual students.
There are many, many reasons for adopting the school bond
issue.
In fact, there are 1.2 million reasons. That's how many boys
and girls we have in public schools of North Carolina today. And
that number is increasing each year.
If there ever was a program for education that arose from the
grass roots, this school bond program is it. The reason that it was
introduced in the General Assembly was not because someone
at the top said it should be introduced. It was introduced because
the people at the local level— people like you and your neigh-
bors—saw the urgent need for more classrooms. Some parents
saw their children going to school in double shifts. Other parents
saw their children being taught in trailers. Still many others saw
their children attending classrooms that were outdated years ago.
That is the reason that organizations like the United Forces for
Education, the North Carolina Association of County Com-
missioners, the North Carolina School Boards Association, and
Public Addresses and Summaries
463
many others got behind this bill and helped put it through the
General Assembly.
Anyone who doubts that this is a nonpartisan issue needs only
to read the vote in the State House of Representatives and in the
State Senate. In the State House of Representatives, 104 members,
representing both parties, voted for the bond issue. In the Senate
this bond issue was approved by a two to one margin. It is easy
to understand why members of both parties supported the school
bond bill in the 1963 General Assembly. It is easy to understand
why elected representatives of every section of our state supported
this act. There is not a single school unit in North Carolina that
does not need additional school space. That's why the legislators
gave this bond issue overwhelming approval.
And that's why I am confident that when parents and grand-
parents and other citizens go the polls on November 3, they will
overwhelmingly approve this bond issue. I believe the adult
citizens of North Carolina will decide the children of our state
are worth it.
SOUTHERN ASSOCIATION OF STATE PLANNING
AND DEVELOPMENT AGENCIES
Raleigh
October 5, 1964
The greatest industrial story since the industrial revolution was
probably written in the southern states after World War II,
according to Governor Sanford. Formerly the South, overly
dependent on agriculture, exported young people to other sections
and imported manufactured goods. After World War II, the
section was ready to move forward. Sanford said there was no
excuse for the low economic status of the South because natural
resources were abundant and problems and handicaps of the past
had been overcome. There was no question but that the last part
of the twentieth century belonged to the southern section of the
United States.
DEDICATION CEREMONIES FOR NEW
DORMITORIES AT CHOWAN COLLEGE
Murfreesboro
October 17, 1964
Speaking at the dedication of new buildings at Chowan College,
464
Papers of Terry Sanford
Governor Sanford told of the deep regard for the past prevalent
in the Chowan area, adding that there was even greater regard
for posterity. He said North Carolina built on the past but did
not rest on the past. To prove his point, he reviewed some of the
history of the area and of Chowan College. The true value of
Chowan would, he felt, be seen in the future as its graduates
assumed position of leadership. The Governor continued with
a discussion of the significance of all church-related colleges. He
said he favored the proposal that these schools receive their fair
share of funds coming into North Carolina under the Higher
Education Facilities Act. Such a proposal would not violate the
principle of separation of church and state but would represent
a marked saving to the taxpayers and would not be charity. The
Governor suggested that the state pay to each student attending
a private college a tuition grant equal to half of what it would
cost if the student attended a state-supported institution. He also
recommended unlimited loan funds from the state. In conclusion,
Sanford expressed the opinion that new frontiers would be
conquered in Chowan College and across North Carolina by
putting faith and work and money into education.
PIEDMONT CRESCENT TOUR BANQUET
Charlotte
October 20, 1964
[The Piedmont Crescent Tour, which originated in Raleigh and termi-
nated in Charlotte, had as its theme the importance of planning for the
Piedmont Crescent area of North Carolina. A special nine-car Southern
Railway train carried civic leaders and businessmen from cities and towns in
the area. The climax of the trip was the address by Governor Sanford at
the banquet held at the Myers Park Country Club in Charlotte.]
The Piedmont Crescent of North Carolina is probably a unique
area in the nation. It is in the mainstream of East Coast com-
merce. It has a good mixture of industry, services, and agriculture.
It has a good mixture of developed land and open space. It
already operates as an economic region. It has 2 million people-
as big as a "metropolis"— yet not a "mother city." It has a string
of livable size, sister cities.
It has tremendous potential if regionalism is promoted to
exercise economic power; to have cultural, business, and recreation
facilities usually found only in a metropolis (concert halls, major
league baseball, banking services, markets); to attract payrolls; to
Public Addresses and Summaries
465
preserve identity of cities by keeping them from fusing together;
to make the nation conscious of the area (America will remember
"powerful Piedmont Crescent" when it may not remember "Bur-
lington" or "Greensboro" or "Concord" or "Charlotte") and to
spread benefits throughout North Carolina.
Modern commerce requires concentration of business, services,
and people.
The Crescent may be the compromise between Frank Lloyd
Wright's "Broadacres," a rural city— and LeCorbusier's concept
of the super-city with very high density.
If we "follow the path of least resistance" as Lewis Mumford
warned us fifteen years ago, "the cities of North Carolina will lose
their regional characteristics, instead of developing them further^
and will take on the worst features of metropolitan areas every-
where, with blight and bankruptcy as their final portion. In fifty
years, if North Carolina does not plan to maintain its present
decentralized pattern, Charlotte, Raleigh, and High Point will be
indistinguishable from Detroit; and the surrounding countryside
will become merely a real-estate speculators' annex to the growing
metropolis."
He went on to point out that we would be "wealthier in all
the things that money can buy, and poorer in all the things that
are beyond price or purchase: neighborly association, friendly
intercourse, home life, intimate contact with nature, the spiritual
values that cannot be mechanized, standardized, or wholly insti-
tutionalized."
If we force the thinking on development of these cities into
the traditional molds, we will make the traditional mistakes.
Since the area is different, since it is not blighted, since there
is a special opportunity to create a new type of city, it will require
new thinking. Let us throw away the book on cities and take a
fresh approach. Why not? Very few have the chance we have to
create the good life as we build an urban region. Most other
cities are preoccupied with undoing mistakes.
Our task will take thought and action by thousands of people
to get the job done. Someone has to start, someone must organize
and lead.
To provide the leadership I have started by appointing the
Executive Committee on the Piedmont Crescent 2000 Com-
mission. The members will recruit the 2000 good citizens whose
thought and action will be needed. They will plan for the year
2000.
Their charge, as I have told them in giving them their com-
missions, is:
466
Papers of Terry Sanford
The promotion of the proper development of the Piedmont
Crescent of North Carolina, which is that group of cities and
related rural areas from the vicinity of the city of Raleigh to the
vicinity of the city of Charlotte.
The stimulation of the growth of jobs, income, and capital
investment in the Crescent.
The giving of advice on the proper growth of the Crescent to
the end that it may be economically efficient, culturally rich, and
aesthetically attractive.
The education of the people on the problems, potentials, and
pro,grams of the Crescent.
That is a staggering assignment in four sentences. It is for them
and for you and for the people of the Crescent to translate it into
programs, into action, and into the finest region of cities in the
United States. [The Governor concluded by naming the members
of the commission. See list of appointments, pages 747-748, for
these names.]
GOVERNOR'S TRAVEL INFORMATION CONFERENCES
Greenville, Winston-Salem, Asheville
October 28, 29, 30, 1964
Three day-long conferences were held in October, 1964, to
promote the travel industry in North Carolina. North Carolinians
who were in the business of serving tourists and other travelers
were invited to attend. The Governor asked his audience if each
thought he was getting his share of this billion-dollar industry,
which was estimated to grow to $2 billion by 1974 and to $3
billion by 1984. With 27 million people visiting North Carolina
in 1963, the need for good service was obvious. Sanford urged the
group to be prepared for future visitors and to remember that
there was no longer any such thing as "in-season" because tourists
were taking trips at all times of the year. Increased incomes and
leisure were predicted for the future, meaning more business for
service stations, motels, and restaurants. North Carolina's advertis-
ing campaign would mean business for North Carolinians. San-
ford complimented the TV stations and other news media for
their co-operation in giving free advertising to the state, but he
reminded his audience that competition for the travel dollar
would increase. "By more closely co-ordinating the activities of
all segments of the travel industry— restaurants, service stations,
hotels and motels, travel and historical attractions, cities and
Public Addresses and Summaries
467
counties— we can present a unified promotion punch that other
states can't touch. The spirit is here— the opportunity is here."
Thus did the Governor sum up the requirements for expansion.
He concluded by saying that "travel is a big and growing busi-
ness in North Carolina. Every community can share in its bene-
fits. To what extent can be determined by how well we recognize
our assets, develop them, and market them. Together, let's make
the most of North Carolina's fabulous travel future."
OPENING OF ADVANCEMENT SCHOOL
Winston-Salem
November 8, 1964
[The Advancement School, made possible by financial investments on the
part of the state, the city of Winston-Salem, the Department of Health,
Education, and Welfare, and the Carnegie Foundation, was established to
give specialized training for three months to eighth graders whose achieve-
ments were below the level of their potential. At no cost to them, seven
students and a teacher attended from each school represented. Three hundred
and fifty students were present for this opening address by Governor San-
ford.]
Those who come to this place, students and teachers alike, are
explorers pioneering into new and exciting frontiers.
North Carolina is a leader in education and I would have us
become the leader in American education.
We know there are better ways of teaching and quicker ways
of learning than we are now using. You students are prospecting
for those ways.
You were chosen because you have the intelligence and ability,
and because we had confidence in your willingness to help us seek
the answers to the riddles of learning.
The Advancement School is one path to these discoveries about
learning and teaching we expect to make. What we discover here
will be sent out into the schools of the nation for the enlighten-
ment of those who are charged with the education of the nation.
So what you do here is not limited to you, and it is not limited
to the Advancement School in Winston-Salem. The work you
do here, if you do it well and conscientiously, can become uni-
versal.
We seek to become the best in the nation in the system of edu-
cation we offer our boys and girls. The Advancement School
is one of the means of achieving this ambition. It is a part of the
468
Papers of Terry Sanford
broad plan of the Learning Institute of North Carolina, which
we have come to call "LING."
LING joins together all the forces of education, to seek, to test,
and to evaluate all that is known or to be known about learning
and education. LING joins together all the forces of education
to apply and put to us all of the profitable lessons learned by this
joint and massive effort of research and development.
Sponsored by Duke University, the University of North Caro-
lina in all of its campuses, the State Board of Education, and the
North Carolina Fund, joined in by the Superintendent of Public
Instruction and the Department of Public Instruction and the
Board of Higher Education, advised and counseled by our school
superintendents, principals, and teachers across the state, LING
truly belongs to everybody who has anything to do with the
schooling of our youth.
LING is the most significant factor in the improvement of edu-
cation in America. This is our means of leadership. As we do a
better job in education, North Carolina becomes the leader and
North Carolinians become the contributors to and the bene-
ficiaries of an advancing civilization.
You are a part of the frontier of improved education.
I am grateful to Gordon McAndrew^^^ and faculty, to city
officials and all you have planned, to Harold Howe^^^ and LINC
and to you.
This school is the spirit of North Carolina.
GOVERNORS CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION
Atlanta, Georgia
November 11, 1964
Meeting in Atlanta, Governor Sanford began with a reference to
Veterans Day, commenting on the appropriateness of celebrating
the occasion with a conference concerned with the improvement
of educational opportunities. Challenges to maintain peace and
freedom remained. The South was rising in the fields of education,
industry, commerce, and agriculture; the South was rising as a
^^'^ Gordon L. McAndrew, native of Oakland, California, participant in teaching
and experimental programs; former Director of Interagency School Project of
Oakland Public Schools; appointed Director of North Carolina Advancement
School, 1964. News and Observer, July 31, 1964.
Harold Howe, educator from Scarsdale, New York; served in capacities of
teacher, principal; trustee of Yale, Vassar; named Director of Learning Institute
of North Carolina, 1964. News and Observer, May 1, 1964.
Public Addresses and Summaries
469
region; and each state of the South was also rising as a unit. In
the past southerners had blamed the lost cause, discriminatory
freight rates, lack of capital, a disease-prone climate, and other
external factors for their troubles, but such factors could no
longer be used as excuses. The South had come to realize that
ignorance and freedom would not work together, that farming
was becoming increasingly mechanized and required skilled
workers, that cheap labor would not attract industry in the future
though expensive education would, and that investments in edu-
cation were vital to economic growth. The need for skilled
craftsmen, scientists, and engineers had to be met in order to
attract top industries. Sanford commented that the time had come
for the South to stop crawling and walking and to begin running.
He added that too small a proportion of southerners were
engaged in occupations which required a high degree of education
and training. The South, which needed to get the most out of
educational efforts at all levels, also needed long-range plans.
The Governor referred to North Carolina's study of education
beyond the high school and Georgia's Educational Improvement
Council, commenting that North Carolina's educational and gov-
ernment officials would watch Georgia's effort with interest.
Education was crying for leadership; Sanford urged the South to
answer the call and serve in the role of leader in this vital area.
NEW JERSEY EDUCATION ASSOCIATION
Atlantic City, New Jersey
November 13, 1964
Governor Sanford spoke to a group of New Jersey educators,
again speaking on the theme of education. He said the greatest
force for subversion of democratic ideals and human aspirations
was ignorance. The greatest infringement on civil rights was the
denial of the best educational opportunities. Rural and urban
children, children from all sections and of all races were the
victims of this denial. Education determined progress. "It em-
braces all the hopes that the government fosters, including world
peace. . . ." Educational support was a requirement for industry
and business growth; a "child is helpless without education."
North Carolina's story was summarized to illustrate the results
when both educators and public officials were concerned. Concern
was needed, however, beyond the legislative halls and beyond
monetary support. School people had to have an active concern.
470
Papers of Terry Sanford
The Governor described North Carolina programs for retarded
children; he discussed the investment of $4 million to find better
ways of teaching the first three grades; he told the group about
the "Operation Second Chance" program for dropouts; and he
briefly explained the Learning Institute of North Carolina, LING,
which was set up to do research on education. These examples
showed what could be accomplished when there was concern and
conviction that the job could be done. Sanford stated that the job
was waiting to be done and that there was no need for delay in
getting to work on it.
DEDICATION OF STATE LEGISLATIVE BUILDING
Raleigh
November 20, 1964
[Governor Sanford's statements concerning the new Legislative Building
revealed clearly the significance of the occasion. The building, designed by
Edward Durrell Stone, of New York City, and Holloway-Reeves, of Raleigh,
was the first state-owned structure to be planned and used solely for legis-
lative fuctions. Its architecture attracted much attention, and thousands of
citizens visited Raleigh to see the new State House. The formal dedication
ceremony, held two years after the Legislative Building had been completed
and put in use, was attended by dignitaries from all parts of North Carolina.
Because the plane bringing him from New Haven, Connecticut, especially
for the dedication ceremony was delayed by bad weather, the Governor's
remarks were read by Mr. Hugh Cannon, Director of Administration.]
The most eloquent dedication that could be given for any
building was written during the first six months of 1963. It was
written by the members of the 1963 General Assembly when
they wrote one of the most forward-looking legislative records of
any General Assembly in the long history of North Carolina.
This is a magnificent building, and we could spend hours dis-
cussing its beauty. This is a fascinating building which has
attracted tens of thousands of people from each of the 100 counties
of North Carolina and from each of the fifty states and from many
foreign lands. In the future years it will attract millions more.
But more magnificent and fascinating even than the archi-
tecture and setting of this building is the action for progress of
North Carolina that already has taken place within these halls.
From this Legislative Building already have come $100 million
worth of new classrooms for the boys and girls of North Caro-
lina. From this building have come the blueprints and funds for
three new senior colleges— one in the East at Wilmington, one
Public Addresses and Summaries
471
in the Piedmont at Charlotte, and one in the West at Asheville.
From this building also have come many new laboratories and
classrooms and dormitories for our university and each of the
state-supported colleges. In this building the authorization and
the financing of a system of comprehensive community colleges
across North Carolina have been made.
Here the legislators of North Carolina already have built new
port facilities, new highways, new industries, new educational
television stations, provided for new opportunities for the talented
and new chances for the retarded, another new building which
will be located near here for the cultural agencies of state govern-
ment, new mental hospitals, and a new school of the arts.
Within this building also has been written more traffic safety
le;gislation than in any session of the General Assembly since the
coming of the T-Model Ford.
This has come about not as a Governor's program, but as a
program for all the citizens of North Carolina. This record
of achievement for North Carolinians resulted from the courage
of the members of the 1963 General Assembly. We had a strong
General Assembly in 1963, and we will have a strong General
Assembly in 1965. North Carolina is proud of its past. And, there-
fore, it is appropriate that you can see from this building the old
State Capitol where for more than a century legislators worked
for the betterment of North Carolina.
North Carolinians are even prouder of their future, and it is
to that future that we are dedicating this remarkable building
today. The record already compiled here will be written large in
the history of our state. The future of North Carolina will be tied
closely to what goes on here in 1965 and 1967 and 1969 and all
the years ahead.
Here then is a building which embodies consensus of the needs
and the dreams and the potential of North Carolinians from the
Atlantic to the Appalachians.
DEDICATION OF SANDHILLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE
Southern Pines
November 25, 1964
The orbit into space did not just happen. "Man built upon
man's knowledge. Frontiers of new knowledge were forged. Brain
power had long before been put to work." Thus did Governor
Sanford begin his address at the dedication of a new community
college in Southern Pines. He called the new institution a pioneer-
472
Papers of Terry Sanford
ing one, a status which could also be applied to the entire com-
prehensive community college system in North Carolina. The
system was not being established, without prior knowledge, how-
ever, as other states had had experience in this field. Sanford said
the goal of his administration had been quality education and
that hopes had become realities. He outlined major achievements
in the field of education, concluding with the prediction that a
new day was being realized through education and that the door
of opportunity was being opened.
CONVENTION OF THE NATIONAL COUNCIL
OF TEACHERS OF ENGLISH
Cleveland, Ohio
November 26, 1964
During the last weeks of his administration, Governor Terry
Sanford continued to speak on the topic of education, both in
addressing groups in North Carolina and in speaking to out-of-
state audiences. After outlining progress made in America, Gov-
ernor Sanford told an Ohio audience that there were still gaps
in many areas, such as education, peace, and mental retardation.
He concluded that teachers had a vital role in remedying existing
defects and that the sum total of efforts in the classroom was more
important to the continuing defense than the total sum of efforts
at military bases. Education, the key answer to overcoming
poverty, trained young people to use their brains rather than their
backs. Sanford stressed the strong correlation between a state's
investment in education and its income. Experience showed that
"as we have invested more in schoolhouses, we have been obligated
to invest less in the poor houses." Experience further showed
"that the lines at the Welfare Department decrease in direct
proportion to the increase in lines at commencement time." The
success of the Economic Opportunity Act would be determined by
the educational opportunities action taken.
DEDICATION OF GASTON COLLEGE
Dallas
December 6, 1964
Governor Sanford began by commenting on landmarks calling
attention to the emerging state of North Carolina, such as smoke-
stacks, silos and barns, highways, and most significantly, schools
Public Addresses and Summaries
473
and colleges. He referred to Gaston County as an outstanding one,
but one in which too many of the people had not had an oppor-
tunity for education to equip them for higher paying jobs. Because
of this situation, the decision was made to build a comprehensive
community college, with financing being made possible because
the citizens of the county were willing to vote a new tax on
themselves. Sanford said funds thus spent would be repaid as
they were returned in the form of "higher salaries, greater trade,
more bank deposits and in a thousand other ways." Gaston Col-
lege was cited as an example of co-operative endeavor of local,
state, and federal governments. The 1963 General Assembly
approved the system of community colleges, schools which would
bring education beyond the high school to every section of
North Carolina. In dedicating Gaston College, Governor Sanford
charged the students of the county and neighboring counties "to
take full advantage of new and exciting educational opportuni-
ties."
DEDICATION OF SITE FOR FOOD SCIENCE BUILDING
NORTH CAROLINA STATE OF THE UNIVERSITY ^
OF NORTH CAROLINA AT RALEIGH
Raleigh
December 1 1, 1964
The dedication at which Governor Sanford spoke represented,,
he said, a potential investment which would bring a rich return.
Teaching and research would take place, and this Department of
Food Science was part of the plan to lift North Carolina farm
income to $1.6 billion by 1966. Despite cancer scares, boll weevils,
black shank, and other problems, the goal would be met. Despite
the know-how of farmers, they had to eat food products produced
all over the country, a fact which led the Governor to stress the
need for North Carolina to process food. He said education had
been emphasized but there were still limited opportunities and
many of the educated children were moving elsewhere. Industrial
expansion, including that in the field of food processing, would
provide incentive which was badly needed. Since the establish-
ment of a special food processing program in 1961, an average
of one new food processing plant, or expansion, had occurred
every week. Sanford mentioned the co-operative endeavors of
the Department of Conservation and Development, the Depart-
ment of Agriculture, the North Carolina Rural Rehabilitation
474
Papers of Terry Sanford
Corporation, and the Business Development Corporation, along
with North Carolina State. With local co-operation added. North
Carolina could produce its own food. "And if we fret that our
waistlines are getting larger, we will know that the income of
North Carolina is getting larger with every mouthful we eat."
PRODIGAL SONS AND DAUGHTERS
OF NORTH CAROLINA LUNCHEON
Washington^ D. C.
December 21, 1964
[The Prodigal Sons of North CaroHna was an organization established
by Governor Sanford for native Tar Heels who, working and residing out-
side the state, maintained close ties with their home state and with each
other. Speaking to a luncheon meeting of the Washington group. Governor
Sanford told the members of news "back home."]
Looking around these tables today, you can see why North
Carolinians are not scared of the federal government as some
folks are in other states. We are not afraid of Washington and we
are not going to secede from the union because a good portion
of the people running things up here are our kinfolk.
We are proud of the Tar Heels who work in the White House,
in the other executive offices, in the Congress, in business and
industry, the arts and the professions.
In fact, we are just as proud of you as we are of those earlier
Prodigal Sons like Andrew Jackson, James K. Polk, and Andrew
Johnson, who began in North Carolina their journeys to Wash-
ington.
For those of you who have not had the opportunity to get back
home lately, I want to report to you that North Carolina is chang-
ing—and we believe that it is changing for the beter. Over the
years North Carolina has moved from the south end of a mule
to the topside of a computer. We still have our "chitlin" struts like
we always did, but we now also have a fast growing food process-
ing industry. Those pine trees still stand as tall as they did when
you lived in North Carolina, but they now share the landscape
with skyscrapers and smokestacks and even a NASA tracking
station.
I don't have to remind the members of this audience that North
Carolina was the site of the first English settlement in the New
World. But you will be interested in the fact that North Carolina
in the last few years has been establishing sizable colonies of
Public Addresses and Summaries
475
immigrants from New Jersey and New York and Illinois and
other states as new industries move into our state.
Of course, you know that North Carolina was first in the union
to open a state university. But you may be interested in knowing
that in the last General Assembly we authorized three new senior
colleges— one in the East at Wilmington, one in the Piedmont at
Charlotte, and one in the West at Asheville. Perhaps even more
important we authorized construction of a system of compre-
hensive community colleges that is designed to extend universal
public education for two additional years.
North Carolinians are proud of our past. But we are prouder
still of our potential. That's why when we celebrate, as we did
last week, the anniversary of the first airplane flight at Kitty
Hawk, we celebrate even more the production of missiles at places
like Western Electric and Douglas Aircraft Company.
Tar Heels traditionally have boasted of the fact that the first
declaration for independence was adopted at Halifax a month or
so before the Philadelphia Convention in 1776. We also are proud
of the fact that North Carolina refused to ratify the United
States Constitution until the civil rights contained in the first ten
amendments were added.
But it occurred to us that if the men at Halifax had the courage
to declare for independence back in 1776 and if North Carolinians
of the eighteenth century were so democratic that they would
not ratify the Constitution until the Bill of Rights was added,
then we of the twentieth century should show some of the same
sort of courage. That's why in recent years North Carolina towns
from the old plantation country of the East to the communities
of the mountains have established Good Neighbor Councils to
encourage employment without regard to race, color, or creed.
That is why the 1963 General Assembly took the color bar from
around our National Guard. And that is why state agencies have
been encouraged and instructed to hire people without regard
to race.
North Carolinians have been doing these things because down
through the generations the citizens of our state have sought to
hand their sons and daughters two things: a rich past and an
even richer future.
I was interested in 1963 to read of a high level debate between
Gerald Johnson and Arnold Toynbee. It was Toynbee's theory
that the reason for North Carolina's modern progress was the fact
that prior to the Civil War we didn't have nearly as much as other
southern states. Therefore, we didn't lose as much in the Civil
War, and we didn't spend as much time worrying about the past.
I am inclined to agree with Gerald Johnson's theory that it has
476
Papers of Terry San ford
been since 1900 that North CaroHna has forged ahead and that
the big reason for whatever progress our state has made in this
century can be credited to Charles Brantley Aycock. Aycock pro-
posed "the equal right of every child born on earth to have the
opportunity to burgeon out all there is within him."
Now that was a right tall order for a mighty poor state when
Aycock uttered those words. It was an extremely hard order for
North Carolinians in the depression thirties. It certainly was not
an easy goal to fulfill when schools in other states were closing
after the Supreme Court decision of 1954.
But during the depression, North Carolina kept faith with
Aycock's goal by adopting an unpopular tax to keep the school
doors open. And in the fifties responsible leaders in both the white
and Negro races kept faith with that goal by refusing to permit
the closing of the school doors. I believe North Carolinians of
this decade are keeping faith with that goal, as evidenced by the
overwhelming approval in both houses of our General Assembly
of an unpopular tax to finance the greatest advance made in public
education in the history of North Carolina.
If you think about Aycock's words a minute, you will see that
they are pregnant with problems as well as with potentials. How
do you build an educational system that gives a child of an IQ
of 142 the opportunity to burgeon out all that is within him?
On the other end of the scale, what do you do for the child who
through a quirk of nature is mentally retarded? What sort of
school opportunities do you present the child who is artistically
gifted? What do you do for the young man who, having finished
high school, does not have the money to go on to college? How
do you provide for the child who is talented with his hands but
doesn't do too well with "book learning"? What sort of edu-
cational opportunity do you offer the child from the under-
privileged neighborhood who comes from a home where there
are no books?
It seemed to us that if we found the solutions to these questions
we would be finding solutions to the continuing problem of how
to end the cycle of poverty under which the children of poor
parents grew up to be the parents of poor children. We also knew
that through building schools we would be building the much
needed new industries in our state. It was obvious to us that as
mechanization continued on the farm and as automation con-
tinued in the factories brain power would replace back power as
the chief need for employment. So first, we turned our attention
to the so-called average child who constitutes the great bulk of
the population. We added |100 million in enrichment funds to
Public Addresses and Summaries
477
the public school budget in 1961, and we added another $50
million in 1963.
Now these enrichment funds went to many different channels.
One of the largest of these channels, of course, was the pay of
school teachers. Without any disrespect to Senators Ervin^^- and
Jordan, I would say that I agree with Admiral Hyman Rickover
when he says that teachers should be paid more than United
States Senators. (Rickover said senators because they make more
than governors.) Yet for too long in North Carolina, and in most
states, we have tried to pay teachers off with red apples and year-
book dedications. The enrichment funds for the public schools
also meant smaller class loads. They meant more books in
libraries. Those funds meant clerical assistance for the teachers
so that the teachers could spend their jobs with the students
rather than reports. These enrichment funds meant that students
in every school could have a wider range of courses. For example,
students in some schools would have a chance to study phvsics for
the first time.
To effect these improvements, we had to pay for them. And we
are paying for them through what is popularly known back home
as "Terry's Tax." I've never been sorry that I recommended that
tax and I have yet to meet a legislator who was sorry that he voted
for it. I might add, the vast majority of those legislators were
re-elected not only in 1962 but were re-elected also in 1964.
Now according to NEA figures North Carolina made the
greatest advance of any state in the union in 1961 in improving
its public schools. It would have been easy to stop right there. But
North Carolina was too far behind the rest of the nation. And our
nation was too far behind where it should be in public education.
It seemed to us that if we took care of the average child that we
also should take care of the especially talented child. Therefore,
we greatly increased the special classes for the bright students
within the public school system of North Carolina, and we
established a special school to provide superior instruction for
400 talented children every summer at Winston-Salem.
At the other end of the scale we were interested in the mentally
retarded children. For too many years the only thing we had to
offer the mentally retarded was a chain and filthy clothes at
worst, or, at best, custodial care. We knew from experience that
many of these children were trainable and educable. Therefore,
the 1963 General Assembly of North Carolina adopted a broad
"2 Sam J. Ervin, Jr. (1896- ), lawyer, judge, and civic leader from Mor-
ganton; Congressman in United States House of Representatives, 1946-1947;
Associate Justice of State Supreme Court, 1948-1954; successor to Clyde R. Hoey in
the United States Senate. North Carolina Manual, 1963, 499-501.
478
Papers of Terry Sanford
program which seeks to help such children to become self-respect-
ing and self-supporting.
Then, we looked at the children who had average or above-
average intelligence but who, for one reason or another, just do
not learn. This fall we opened what we call the Advancement
School of North Carolina. In this school students will live in
dormitories and receive intensive instruction from teacliers from
across the state. We hope in this school not only to help the
students chosen to take a semester of work there to catch up, but
also to take the lessons that we learn there and supply them in
each of our 100 counties and offer the lessons that we learn to
schools in other states.
Now what about the young people who are artistically gifted?
Should they have to go to Julliard or to Europe to develop their
talents? We thought not. Therefore, we established the North
Carolina School of the Arts which will open next year.
In looking over the educational needs of North Carolina we
saw a statistic that we did not like: We found that about 50 per
cent of the children who started in the first grade never got
through high school. We found that those who did get through
high school often did not have the education that they needed
to move successfully into adult life. To examine this question and
many others related to education our state established the Learn-
ing Institute of North Carolina. No industrialists operating on a
budget of more than a half billion dollars a year would neglect
his research department the way that we have neglected research
into education. We hope and we believe that LINC will be
successful in learning some new things about education.
Once a boy or girl has finished high school where does he or she
go? In our ever increasing labor market no less an authority than
Secretary of Labor Willard Wirtz has suggested two additional
years of compulsory education. That is the reason that we have
established a blueprint for a system of comprehensive community
colleges to be built as and where needed across our state. In these
comprehensive community colleges, we have included the indus-
trial education centers to provide the instruction for young people
to acquire the skills so badly needed by our increasingly skilled
industries. We also have included college parallel work so that
students may live at home and commute to college. Many of these
students could never have afforded to go to Chapel Hill or to
Boone or to Greenville to college. Then we have assigned these
comprehensive community colleges the large task of providing
adult education courses to help grown people learn how to read
and write. We have dedicated two of these new colleges within
Public Addresses and Summaries
479
the last two weeks. And we hope that there will be twenty-two
when this decade is over.
North Carolinians have made these and other advances in edu-
cation because:
We believe education is more important in breaking the cycle
of poverty than all the handouts combined.
We believe the report cards from the schools are more import-
ant to the economy than the Dow Jones averages.
We believe that sitting in schools will more rapidly assure
equal rights than sitting in restaurants and that education is our
best cure for bigotry.
In our reach for the stars, education provides the greatest thrust
power.
REPORT TO THE PEOPLE OVER
STATE-WIDE RADIO AND TELEVISION NETWORKS
Raleigh
January 4, 1965
[In this last gubernatorial report to the people, Governor Sanford dis-
cussed his administration, its accomplishments, and its aspirations for North
Carolina, in a thirty-minute broadcast over the facilities of WTVD-TV and
WPTF radio. As a final gesture to the student population of North Carolina,
Governor Sanford invited students from Raleigh's Needham Broughton
High School to be with him in the studio. The Governor did not speak
from a formal address but delivered his remarks "off the cuff." This tran-
scription of his remarks was made from a tape recording at Radio Station
WPTF in Raleigh.]
During the past four years, I've been traveling about the state,
visiting schools, and talking to students about what I hoped we
could do in North Carolina and what I hoped we could do in
the schools. I had a very real feeling that the students could do
about as much as any other group in setting high standards of
quality, in achieving those standards by better performance in
school, and by insisting to their elders, their parents, their leaders,
their school people, and the people in government who vote
money, that they wanted to have the best school system in all
the world. I believe that the students, working together and catch-
ing this spirit, have done much to contribute to the improvement
of education in this state, and because of that, to help in the total
effort to improve education all across the country. So on this last
day, as I had a chance to talk to the people of the state, and again
to the students of the state, I thought that we might have a final
480
Papers of Terry Sanford
conference on where Norh Carolina has been, and where we hope
it will continue to move in the future.
I grew up in Laurinburg, a town about 100 miles south of
Raleigh, and on the wall of the house I lived in was a framed
drawing, "The Toast to the Old North State." As you know, it
goes something like this:
Here's to the land of the long-leaf pine
The summer land where the sun doth shine.
Where the weak grow strong, and the strong grow great,
Here's to down home— the Old North State!
That's what we've been trying to do in North Carolina: to make
it a place where the weak grow strong and the strong grow great.
And that's what it's all been about; that's what everything that
we've done in government in the past four years has been measured
against. Can we make North Carolina the kind of a community
where all the people can have their best chance to grow strong,
and to grow still stronger, and then grow great? Measure every-
thing we've done against that ideal, that hope, and that challenge,
and you'll find that we have tried to follow that light.
Now I don't mean physically strong and physically great, alone,
though that's important too. You know something about our
physical fitness programs. Some of you have participated in those
programs, and a couple of you obviously haven't. You know some-
thing about the wonderful climate that we have here— the attrac-
tions for people who are facing retirement.
That kind of physical climate is good, and we are proud of it
and glad to have it. But when we talk about growing strong and
growing great we're talking about something of far greater
significance and fuller meaning than just physical well-being and
physical strength. This business of growing strong begins with
you, because I think we must start with people who are develop-
ing, who have their chance now to get ready for whatever they
are going to do. This whole business starts with you, your atti-
tude and your belief, how you look at the state, and how you hope
for the future.
Let's take your jobs, for example. This state has been trying
to do a great deal about providing jobs. We don't want you to
finish school, go to college, and then to leave the state never to
return, except maybe for visits at Christmas time. We want our
skilled young people to use their knowledge and brains and talents
here at home. We want to create the kind of jobs right here that
can give you as good a challenge as you get anywhere else. That's
why the state is engaged in the business of trying to provide better
jobs and broader economic opportunity— not just to have jobs,
Public Addresses and Summaries
481
but because jobs give people a chance to grow stronger, and
ultimately, the whole people, a chance to grow greater.
We can't create jobs— the state can't make jobs— but what we
can do is to make this the kind of place that will be attractive to
people who can create jobs— to industry. And so we've spent a
lot of time trying to get industry to come here. The father of one
of you in this studio is a good example. He came here with a
whole new system of plants because North Carolina looked
attractive to him as a place that his company could come and
make a profit and do well in the community. We've been trying
to appeal to industry in that way so jobs will be created, not by
the state, but because of the efforts the state has been making.
Now you can measure, also, our hope to grow stronger and
greater by what we've done in highways. You might think that
highways don't have much to do with people, but they do. Gover-
nor Scott's secondary roads, giving us the finest system of secondary
roads anywhere in the country, have contributed so much to
industrial development. People who live out in nonurban areas
can drive in to work and out in all kinds of weather. So we have
a tremendous working force without having to crowd them all in
relatively unwholesome living conditions. Roads contribute much
to jobs, which, in turn, contribute to a better life. This adminis-
tration has spent a lot of time on roads, not because we wanted
to say we have the best road system— though I think now we
perhaps have the third best road system in the country— but
because we wanted to create a stronger economic base. In this
administration we have spent more money, invested more money,
and I think wisely invested it, in roads— interstate roads, primary
roads, and secondary roads— than any other administration in
the history of the state. We've done it as our hope for the future,
as another means, you see, of growing stronger.
You've probably heard this story or read it in the paper, but I
think it helps illustrate the point that no matter how good we
get we still need to do more. We still have people who are living
on unpaved roads, and we still have very dangerous sections of
primary roads. We badly need interstate roads or four-lane limited
highways in some sections of the state, including an east-west
highway. I had been in office less than two years when I had a man
call on me who wanted a little piece of road paved. I couldn't
very well do it— the priority system simply wouldn't allow it—
and I was trying to let him down as easily as possible. And I
explained to him that in terms of all the miles and the miles
paved that we ranked behind only New York and Ohio. If you
throw in the automobiles as a factor we probably rank number
one, because we have fewer automobiles per mile in North Caro-
482
Papers of Terry Sanford
lina as compared to those states. So we probably have the best road
system in the country. I said, "But in any event, Kerr Scott paved
more roads in the time he was in office than have ever been paved
in Texas. California, a tremendous state, has about the same
number of paved secondary roads as we have, but they have about
twice as many unpaved." Happening to look at some figures there,
I added, "In the eighteen months I've been in this business, I've
paved more secondary roads that have ever been paved in the
whole state of Louisiana." And I could see that I was really
getting to him— he was nodding and agreeing with everything I
was saying. "Now what do you think about that?" I asked.
And he said, "I'll tell you what I think about that— I don't
live in Texas or California!"
So you see, in spite of the fact that we are getting good all the
time, when you measure it against what we can do, we still haven't
gone nearly far enough. We need to continue to make our road
and port systems, our rails and airways, the very best possible
because all of these things help make this a state on which we can
build a stronger economic base. And all of these things go
together to provide jobs, which in turn provide you with a better
opportunity to use your education.
Governor Hodges gave this whole idea of creating new jobs
a new outlook. He traveled all over the country, in fact, to other
parts of the world, to tell people about North Carolina. "Here is a
good place to come and build a plant," he would tell them. And
we've carried that on. I visited in Los Angeles, Chicago, Cleve-
land, Pittsburgh and New York, and a number of other places
to talk to industrialists. I told them that North Carolina has what
it takes, and that we have a growing state, a state where you can
make a profit, a state where industry can do well. Therefore we
attract their attention, they come to North Carolina, and they
build up a reservoir of opportunity for you. That's what all this
industrial development is about. It's not so we can cite statistics
and say we're doing well and growing. We're growing for a
purpose— to help you to have a better chance in life, to grow
strong and then to grow great through opportunities.
Now we've got a record of which you can be proud. In the last
four years we've seen more economic growth, more new jobs, and
more new investment than at any time in our history. We
are moving upward, and we ought to continue to move upward
if we continue to drive. During the past four years we've seen
invested in this state in new plants— new plant facilities which
includes of course expansion of old plants— $1.3 billion in new
capital investment. That means at least 120,000 new jobs. Those
are the jobs we can count with this new investment, with this new
Public Addresses and Summaries
483
industry; but if you were to consider all the grocery clerks and
other people that service tjiose 120,000 paying positions, you
would realize how many new jobs are really created. Out of these
new jobs alone at least $400 million in new payroll has been
brought to North Carolina in the last four years. So that's what
we're all about— seeking jobs is simply to seek better oppor-
tunities.
And we haven't just been seeking jobs, but because we want the
best kind of jobs, we've been putting emphasis on several new
kinds. For instance, we've been putting special emphasis on
food processing. Food processing not only means something to
the manufacturer and the person working in the processing, but
it means something to the farmer, and in turn to the small town
bank, the small town merchant, and the small town businessman,
because farm income plays back into the smaller communities.
So you see, we've tried to put emphasis on a specialized kind of
new industry. With the efforts of the Food Science Department
at State College, of our Commerce and Industry Division, and the
Department of Agriculture, we're selling people on the idea that
food processing has a great opportunity for North Carolina. In
these four years we have seen a new food processing industry—
or an expanded food processing industry— on the average of one
a week. We're now really begiiming to move.
We are anxious, not just to have any kind of industry, but to
develop our scientific potential. Here we are, living in an age of
technology; naturally we want to take advantage of it. The 1963
legislature, which did so many good things, created the Board of
Science and Technology. This board, made up of professors and
businessmen, is charged with the responsibility of relating the
new technological achievements in the country and in the world
to North Carolina industry. This question of how to make science
come here and create new jobs and new opportunities for you is
another example of specialized interest.
There are a lot of other things that can be done to create
economic opportunity— planting trees, for example. The state's
engaged in the business of growing seedlings that in turn are
made available at cost to land owners who plant trees. During the
past four years we've cut and processed more timber, and there-
fore drawn more wealth from the land, than any other four-year
period. We have a very fine forestry division. Well, that's good,
but what have we done, along with growing more and cutting
more than ever before? We've ended up this four-year period with
more timber still in the ground than when we began. So we're
getting more out of it, but we're keeping more there as we build
up a resource for the future.
484
Papers of Terry Sanford
The same kind of conservation may be observed with our water
resources. We've impounded more water, or provided for the
impounding of more water than ever before, and we need to
preserve this resource. We've developed the mineral resources,
again drawing wealth from the land; and we've done it in such
a way that the land is not destroyed and scarred as was done fifty
or a hundred years ago in other parts of the country. The new
phosphate mines in Beaufort County, for example, not only
will bring in a new chemical complex to that part of the state
and create many, many new opportunties, but it is being mined
in such a careful way that the countryside remains unspoiled.
In fact, the developers are going to clean it over so well and plant
it that it will be far prettier than it was when they began. They
may even start cattle raising on the old phosphate grounds as they
develop them. So you see how careful planning can use the
resources for wealth and still protect your future.
Now those are just some of the examples of state progress— I
can't possibly tell you everything that ought to be told in the
brief time that's available. But there's another thing that maybe
people haven't always understood. You may say, "I can build a
house any way I want to or I can build a business anywhere I
want to." Well, I think you should be able to do with your
property essentially anything you want to do. But somehow we've
got to plan our growth and zone it. To decide on a particular
kind of community is simply to say we aren't going to build
houses in a way that they are destined to turn into slums. Part
of this business of bringing in new industry is what kind of a
community environment our state offers.
Consequently we have a greatly-expanded Community Plan-
ning Section in state government. It doesn't go out and tell local
communities how to do, but it does advise the local officials, and
it gives them expert advice. Since most of our small towns can't
hire planning departments of their own Ave provide this service.
Every small community no^v has a chance to become the kind
of attractive community which will be appealing to new industry,
and perhaps more important, ^vill become more wholesome for
the people already there.
But in bringing in new jobs and providing these opportunities
for you, maybe the most important single factor has been what I
like to call the spirit of the people. When folks come looking
around and thinking about investing their money they want to
know something about the people. North Carolina has given the
impression that it's a state on the go, that it's ambitious, looking
to the future, the kind of state that has good government as we
do, the kind of state that says that we're going to be fair to every-
Public Addresses and Summaries
485
body and not spend all our energy in group fighting. If we try to
give the spirit of North Carolina the tone of being one that's fair
to everybody, that's wholesome in its outlook, that believes that
prejudice has no place in our lives, that has an optimistic faith
in the future and what we can do, then that spirit of North Caro-
lina is going to do more than anything else to create the jobs and
the opportunities to help us grow strong and help us then grow
great. It's this spirit that you can be a part of, and can mean so
very, very much to what we're doing. And we need to keep this
a state on the go, a state that's fair to everybody, and a state where
we have to keep good government— honest, clean government—
a habit that it's been so long.
But I wouldn't want to give you the impression that jobs are
our only purpose. Jobs are important only because jobs help
people have a better chance in life. That's why we're seeking them
and that's why we're spending the time on it. Our main purpose,
of course, is to help people help themselves. By helping people
help themselves we create a stronger community, and ultimately,
a greater community.
This goes straight back to the state's business of keeping people
in prison. It's not enough just to punish them— that has been
the traditional approach— but North Carolina says we're going
to help them help themselves. We don't want them coming back
to prison. If we've got them there one time that's one time too
many; we want to help them. So we have now a high school in
the woman's prison, and a high school and a technical school in
Central Prison for men. We have a deliberate program designed
to say to every prisoner, "All right, you're in here, you're going
to pay your penalty, but at the same time we don't want you ever
to come back." And so we're trying to train them and to help
them and to move them along. Because of our expanded prison,
probation, and parole systems, we are now one of the few states
with a decreasing prison population. In view of rising crime rates
and rising population, this effort to look out for people and give
them a better chance in life has certainly paid dividends for the
state and her citizens.
We also have a responsibility to look out for people who can't
look out for themselves— those people who are mentally ill. This
is another part of the responsibility of the state to be concerned
with people, and we've greatly expanded this. We are considered
to have one of the half-dozen best mental health systems in the
country, and we're improving all of the time. We have an excel-
lent system of hospitals now, with a general hospital within reach
of every citizen of the state of North Carolina. Again, a responsi-
486
Papers of Terry Sanford
bility is met to help people grow strong and to be in a position
to take advantage of their opportunities.
We have many special groups that need our special attention.
The retarded children have never gotten much of a break in
getting an education and getting a skill and getting ready for life.
The 1963 General Assembly approved a broad program that
covers all of this, and we are going to see that they aren't
neglected.
Then we looked at another group of children— children
caught up somehow in poverty. You probably remember some of
them came into school around the first grade and maybe lasted
through the third or the fourth or the fifth, but somehow they
never seemed to have a chance in life, because they were just
caught up in poverty. Well, we said that this is too great a drag on
the economy; this doesn't give the child a fair break in life. What
can we do about it? We started a program that said not a handout,
but a helping hand. And we want to give these children, through
what now has been called the War on Poverty, a chance to break
out of this situation through many, many ways. I think it can be
done. I think it's the first time in the history of civilization that
it can be done. And as a result of the new, broad opportunities
for these people, the level of the entire state will be raised.
Now what's our principal weapon in the fight on poverty?
It's education. If you educate people, people will create their
opportunities. If you seek these things, you can best obtain them
by education. So first of all we set out to improve the general
standard of education. In 1961, the whole level was raised— across-
the-board improvement of education for the average student
which makes up the great bulk of the population. Then with our
special programs for the gifted children, the Governor's School,
we said that if they have unusual talents they ought to be given
a chance to develop them. The School of the Arts, which will be
open next fall, helps us to lead the advance of civilization, and
to create the best of the talents. We have hoped to make our
schools the best in the nation; we'd like first of all to see that our
schools have the highest standards. We'd like to see that our
schools miss nobody, that they take into account all kinds of
talent and abilities and limitations. And we'd like to see the kind
of a system that is not static— we don't know what's best and
we'll not know what's best tomorrow. We need to keep on grow-
ing and improving and seeking better ways of doing our job of
education. To do some of that, we have looked at the failures
and the dropouts, and we've set up what has been called the
Advancement School. This is established and will be developed
at Winston-Salem. Here, bright students, average and above
Public Addresses and Summaries
487
average in intelligence, who haven't been learning, but who have
been dropping out, are going to come together for a quarter at a
time in residence. In this Advancement School we're going to try
to find out why they haven't been learning and how we can do a
better job of teaching. This is our great laboratory of learning,
and we hope to find better ways.
Then we've set up a program with private funds that we call
the ABC Program, or the "Three R's Program." Four hundred
schools across the state are experimenting in how to do a better
job of teaching reading and writing in the first three grades,
because about 50 per cent of the students weren't learning to
read and therefore ultimately weren't doing very well or were
dropping out.
Then we've established something you will hear much about
and the nation is looking at; we call it the Learning Institute of
North Carolina, LINC. It's over in the Research Triangle at
Quail Roost, and it's the most significant research project in the
country. It's going to tie together all there is to be known about
education, with Duke University and the University of North
Carolina, the North Carolina Fund, and the Board of Education
all working together for the first time to find the best possible
answers to improvement of learning and then to apply them
to the system of education in the state. So this is our hope for
the future; this is our means of continuing to improve in the
future, as we find better ways to make our school system the
best in the nation.
All of these things, I think, sum up without a lot of dry
statistics, the aims of this administration. I hope you begin to
catch the spirit that in North Carolina we have great faith in
the future. In North Carolina we believe that we can lead in
the advancement of civilization, and as I've said before, I hope
we can become the most civilized community in all the world.
We're going to do it by concerning ourselves with people, work-
ing with people, and providing for them a better opportunity in
life. And I believe if we put our trust in people, and if our
weapon against poverty and bigotry is education, we can conquer
all battles and make North Carolina a leader of all the rest of
the nation. You can be a part of that leadership. That's what this
administration has been about.
LIST OF OTHER SPEECHES
AND ADDRESSES
LIST OF OTHER SPEECHES AND ADDRESSES
[This list contains the speeches, addresses, and other talks made by
Governor Sanford during 1961-1965 in addition to those printed or sum-
marized in the preceding sections of this volume. An asterisk following the
date on which a speech was made indicates that the Governor spoke without
manuscript and there was no copy to be preserved.]
January 9, 1961
January 12, 1961
January 25, 1961*
January 26, 1961*
January 30, 1961
February 1, 1961
February 1, 1961
February 8, 1961*
February 12, 1961*
February 13, 1961
February 17, 1961
February 24, 1961*
February 24, 1961
March 3, 1961*
March 6, 1961
March 8, 1961
March 8, 1961
MAHOGANY ASSOCIATION AWARDS DIN-
NER, Chicago, Illinois
GROUND-BREAKING CEREMONIES FOR
W. F. FANCOURT COMPANY (delivered by
Hargrove Bowles, Jr.) , Greensboro
EDUCATION RALLY, Asheville
GOVERNOR'S COUNCIL ON OCCUPA-
TIONAL HEALTH, Raleigh
RURITAN NATIONAL CONVENTION,
Washington, D.C.
DEDICATION OF CHEMSTRAND RE-
SEARCH CENTER, Research Triangle Park
DISTRICT FIVE, NORTH CAROLINA
STATE SCHOOL BOARDS ASSOCIATION,
Teachey
FARM CONFERENCE OF NORTH CARO-
LINA BANKERS ASSOCIATION, Raleigh
METHODIST DISTRICT RALLY, Garner
EDUCATION RALLY, Rocky Mount
ANNUAL MEETING, NORTH CAROLINA
ASSOCIATION FOR MENTAL HEALTH,
Raleigh
IN COMMEMORATION OF FIFTH ANNI-
VERSARY OF GENERAL ELECTRIC OUT-
DOOR LIGHTING DEPARTMENT PLANT,
Hendersonville
ANNUAL MEETING OF HENDERSON-
VILLE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, Hen-
dersonville
DEMOCRATIC CLUB, Charlotte
CAMPBELL COLLEGE FOUNDERS DAY,
Buies Creek
RALEIGH WOMAN'S CLUB, Raleigh
NORTH CAROLINA MERCHANTS AS-
SOCIATION, Raleigh
492
Papers of Terry Sanford
March 8, 1961*
March 10, 1961^
March 11, 1961
March 11, 1961
March 12, 196P
March 13, 1961
March 13, 1961
March 15, 1961
March 18, 1961
March 18, 1961
March 18, 1961
March 21, 1961
March 22, 1961
March 22, 1961
April 4, 1961*
April 9, 1961
April 10, 1961
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ON FOOD
SURPLUS PROGRAM, Raleigh
WILMINGTON CHAMBER OF COM-
MERCE, Wilmington
ANNUAL MEETING, NORTH CAROLINA
MEAT PACKERS ASSOCIATION, Raleigh
INTRODUCTION OF ADMIRAL HYMAN
G. RICKOVER AT YOUNG DEMOCRATIC
CLUB RALLY, Raleigh
DEDICATION OF GREENSBORO COM-
MUNITY CENTER, Greensboro
CONTEMPORARY ISSUES CLASS, NORTH
CAROLINA STATE COLLEGE, Raleigh
"KICK-OFF" DINNER, RALEIGH CON-
CERT MUSIC ASSOCIATION, Raleigh
INTRODUCTION OF DR. JERROLD R.
ZACHARIAS, CHAIRMAN, PHYSICAL
SCIENCE STUDY COMMITTEE, TO THE
NORTH CAROLINA JUNIOR SCIENCE
SYMPOSIUM, Raleigh
INAUGURATION OF DR. SAMUEL D.
PROCTOR, A & T COLLEGE, Greensboro
SANFORD PROGRESS DAYS CELEBRA-
TION, Sanford
NORTH CAROLINA ASSOCIATION OF
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS,
Chapel Hill
ROBESON COUNTY SCHOOLMASTERS
CLUB, ROWLAND
O. MAX GARDNER AWARD DINNER,
Raleigh
INTRODUCTION OF FREDERICK R.
KAPPEL, PRESIDENT OF AMERICAN
TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COM-
PANY, TO NORTH CAROLINA CITIZENS
ASSOCIATION, Raleigh
NATIONAL SPORTSWRITERS AWARDS
BANQUET, Salisbury
NORTH CAROLINA FOOD DEALERS AS-
SOCIATION, Chapel Hill
NATIONAL SECURITY SEMINAR, Winston-
Salem
List of Omitted Speeches
493
April 10, 1961* SOUTHERN STATES PROBATION, PA-
ROLE, AND PRISON ASSOCIATION MEET-
ING, Durham
April 11, 1961 WESTWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH BROTH-
ERHOOD (LADIES NIGHT) , Durham
April 12, 1961* WAKE COUNTY DEMOCRATIC WOMEN,
Raleigh
April 13, 1961* NORTH CAROLINA ELECTRICAL CON-
TRACTORS, Raleigh
April 14, 1961 INGLIS FLETCHER DAY, Edenton
April 17, 1961 ORDER OF THE GOLDEN FLEECE, Chapel
Hill
April 19, 1961 MEETING OF FORSYTH COUNTY AND
WINSTON-SALEM TEACHERS, Winston-
Salem
April 20, 1961 THE OPENING OF SELIG MANUFACTUR-
ING COMPANY, Siler City
April 20, 1961* OPENING OF PITTMAN PLAZA SHOP-
PING CENTER WITH GOVERNOR LIND-
SAY ALMOND, Lynchburg, Virginia
April 20, 1961 WENDELL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE,
Wendell
April 24, 1961* CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT
BOARD AND GUESTS, Sanford
April 27, 1961* OPEN HOUSE AT MASLAND DURA-
LEATHER COMPANY, Mocksville
May 1, 1961* GROUND - BREAKING CEREMONY,
NORTH CAROLINA BAR CENTER, Ral-
eigh
May 1, 1961 TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL CONVENTION,
NORTH CAROLINA AUTOMOBILE DEAL-
ERS ASSOCIATION, Pinehurst
May 1, 1961 DEDICATION OF NORTH CAROLINA
EDUCATION ASSOCIATION HEADQUAR-
TERS BUILDING, Raleigh
May 4, 1961 SAVINGS BONDS LUNCHEON, Raleigh
May 6, 1961* ANNUAL SOUTHERN PHOTOGRAPHER-
OF-THE-YEAR BANQUET, Durham
May 11, 1961* INSURANCE COMPANY EXECUTIVES ON
NORTH CAROLINA TRAFFIC SAFETY
COUNCIL, New York
494
Papers of Terry Sanford
May 12, 1961*
May 15, 1961*
May 18, 1961
May 20, 1961*
May 21, 1961
May 26, 1961*
May 27, 1961*
May 30, 1961
June 5, 1961
June 6, 1961
June 9, 1961
June 10, 1961
June 12, 1961
June 16, 1961*
June 17, 1961
July 11, 1961
August 3, 1961
August 8, 1961
MEREDITH COLLEGE ALUMNAE, Durham
HOKE COUNTY GOLDEN JUBILEE CELE-
BRATION, Raeford
MOUNT OLIVE JUNIOR COLLEGE AP-
PRECIATION DAY, Mount Olive
PAST MASTERS NIGHT OF LAURIN-
BURG MASONIC LODGE #305, A.F. & A.M.,
Laurinburg
EAST CAROLINA COLLEGE COMMENCE-
MENT EXERCISES, Greenville
ROANOKE RAPIDS CHAMBER OF COM-
MERCE, Roanoke Rapids
NORTH CAROLINA STATE COLLEGE
COMMENCEMENT, Raleigh
MEMORIAL DAY SERVICES, NATIONAL
CEMETERY, Raleigh
INTRODUCTION OF JOHN B. SWAIN-
SON, GOVERNOR OF MICHIGAN, AT
THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CARO-
LINA LAW SCHOOL, Chapel Hill
BELMONT ABBEY, Belmont
FORTY-THIRD ANNUAL CONVENTION,
NORTH CAROLINA AMERICAN LEGION,
Charlotte
NATIONAL CONVENTION OF BENEVO-
LENT, PATRIOTIC ORDER OF DOES (de-
livered by Mrs. Margaret P. Foxworth), Ashe-
ville
NORTH CAROLINA CHAPTER OF THE
ORDER OF THE EASTERN STAR, Raleigh
DEDICATION OF MOUNTAIN HORTL
CULTURE CROPS RESEARCH STATION,
Fletcher
THIRTIETH INFANTRY DIVISION AN-
NUAL REVIEW, Fort Bragg
SWEARING-IN CEREMONIES FOR NEW
STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION, Raleigh
FORTIETH ANNIVERSARY MEETING OF
NORTH CAROLINA ASSOCIATION, OR-
DER OF DeMOLAY, Charlotte
ANNUAL DINNER OF FRANKLIN CHAM-
BER OF COMMERCE, Franklin
List of Omitted Speeches
495
August 11, 1961
August 15, 1961*
August 17, 1961*
August 18, 1961
August 19, 1961
August 31, 1961*
September 8, 1961
September 8, 1961*
September 14, 1961*
September 15, 1961
September 15, 1961
September 15, 1961
September 16, 1961
September 20, 1961
September 23, 1961*
September 27, 1961
DEDICATION OF NUTRENA FEED MILL,
Wilson
NATIONAL CONVENTION OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS, Chicago, Illinois
MIDDLE ATLANTIC ASSOCIATION OF
PRESS NEWSPAPER PUBLISHERS AND
MANAGING EDITORS, White Sulphur
Springs, West Virginia
COMMENCEMENT EXERCISES, GEORGE
PEABODY COLLEGE FOR TEACHERS,
Nashville, Tennessee
"CONSOLIDATED UNIVERSITY DAY" AT
THE LOST COLONY, Manteo
SPECIAL SHOWING OF EXHIBIT ON
"YOUR STATE AND THE ATOM," Raleigh
ANNUAL MEETING, NORTH CAROLINA
PEANUT GROWERS ASSOCIATION, Lewis-
ton
NORTH CAROLINA DEBUTANTE BALL,
Raleigh
SOCIETY OF INDUSTRIAL REALTORS,
Charlotte
INTRODUCTION OF SECRETARY OF
AGRICULTURE ORVILLE FREEMAN AT
BREAKFAST SPONSORED BY FARMERS
COOPERATIVE EXCHANGE AND NORTH
CAROLINA COTTON GROWERS COOPER-
ATIVE ASSOCIATION, Raleigh
ANNUAL MEETING, FARMERS COOPER-
ATIVE EXCHANGE AND NORTH CARO-
LINA COTTON GROWERS COOPERATIVE
ASSOCIATION, Raleigh
PENDER COUNTY AGRICULTURAL FAIR,
Burgaw
TENTH ANNIVERSARY CELEBRATION
HONORING BERKSHIRE KNITTING
MILLS, Andrews
DINNER HONORING JOHN MOTLEY
MOREHEAD, Chapel Hill
WYOMING YOUNG DEMOCRATIC CLUBS
CONVENTION, Cheyenne, Wyoming
COMMUNITY MEETING ON EDUCA-
TION, Chattanooga, Tennessee
496
Papers of Terry Sanford
September 29, 1961*
October 2, 1961
October 3, 1961*
October 4, 1961* -
October 8, 1961*
October 9, 1961*
October 11, 1961*
October 15, 1961
October 15, 1961*
October 16, 1961*
October 20, 1961*
October 22, 1961
October 23, 1961*
October 23, 1961*
October 24, 1961*
October 25, 1961
October 26, 1961
October 31, 1961*
October 31, 1961*
STATE HIGHWAY AND PRISON EM-
PLOYEES ASSOCIATION, Durham
DEDICATION OF R. J. REYNOLDS TO-
BACCO COMPANY'S WHITAKER PARK
PLANT, Winston-Salem
LUNCHEON OF SUPERINTENDENTS,
PRINCIPALS, AND DIRECTORS OF IN-
STRUCTION, Kannapolis
DEDICATORY ADDRESS AT MACON
JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, Warrenton
DEDICATORY ADDRESS AT NEW ASHE-
VILLE BILTMORE COLLEGE, Asheville
NORTH CAROLINA ASSOCIATION OF
INSURANCE AGENTS, Pinehurst
WADESBORO MERCHANTS ASSOCIA-
TION, Wadesboro
DEDICATION OF WEST MONTGOMERY
HIGH SCHOOL, Troy
DEDICATORY ADDRESS AT CHARLOTTE
COMMUNITY COLLEGE, Charlotte
LAND GRANT COLLEGE CENTENNIAL
AT STATE FAIR, Raleigh
DEDICATION OF MADISON-MAYODAN
SCHOOL, Mayodan
DEDICATION OF WRENN STREET WING,
SOUTHERN FURNITURE EXPOSITION
BUILDING, High Point
REMARKS AT UNVEILING OF TOWN
CLOCK, Ahoskie
AREA DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION,
Ahoskie
CONFERENCE OF NORTH CAROLINA
SOLICITORS CONCERNING TRAFFIC
SAFETY PROGRAM, Raleigh
TWELFTH ANNUAL FALL FESTIVAL, Red
Springs
GREENSBORO KIWANIS CLUB, Greensboro
BRUNSWICK COUNTY EDUCATION RAL-
LY, Shallotte
COLUMBUS COUNTY EDUCATION
RALLY, Whiteville
List of Omitted Speeches
497
October 31, 1961*
October 31, 1961*
November 1, 1961
November 2, 1961*
November 4, 1961 *
November 5, 1961 *
November 7, 1961*
November 10, 1961*
November 10, 1961*
November 12, 1961
November 14, 1961*
November 15. 1961*
November 15, 1961*
November 15, 1961*
November 17, 1961*
November 17, 1961*
November 17, 1961*
November 19, 1961*
November 21, 1961*
BLADEN COUNTY EDUCATION RALLY,
Elizabethtown
ROBESON COUNTY EDUCATION RALLY,
Lumberton
METHODIST COLLEGE FOUNDERS DAY
PROGRAM, Fayetteville
HALIFAX COUNTY EDUCATION RALLY,
Roanoke Rapids
NORTH CAROLINA STATE COLLEGE
SCHOOL OF AGRICULTURE OPEN
HOUSE, Raleigh
SURRY COUNTY EDUCATION RALLY,
Dobson
ORGANIZATION MEETING OF ECO-
NOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE OF
NASH, EDGECOMBE, MARTIN, WILSON,
PITT, AND BEAUFORT COUNTIES, Rocky
Mount
WELCOMING ADDRESS AT DREYFUS
LABORATORY, Research Triangle Park
YOUNG DEMOCRATIC CLUBS CONVEN-
TION, Durham
NORTH CAROLINA JOINT COUNCIL ON
HEALTH AND CITIZENSHIP (delivered by
Graham Jones) , Greenville
PIEDMONT AREA DEVELOPMENT AS-
SOCIATION, Charlotte
GRAHAM COUNTY EDUCATION RALLY,
Robbinsville
CLAY COUNTY EDUCATION RALLY,
Hayesville
CHEROKEE COUNTY EDUCATION RAL-
LY, Murphy
GATES COUNTY EDUCATION RALLY,
Gatesville
HERTFORD COUNTY EDUCATION RAL-
LY, Ahoskie
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY EDUCATION
RALLY, Jackson
DEDICATION OF WILMINGTON COM-
MUNITY COLLEGE, Wilmington
DURHAM DIVISION OF RESEARCH TRI-
498
Papers of Terry Sanford
November 22, 1961*
November 28, 1961*
November 28, 1961
November 30, 1961
December 2, 1961
December 3, 1961*
December 5, 1961*
December 14, 1961*
December 15, 1961*
December 21, 1961*
January 3, 1962*
January 5, 1962*
January 31, 1962*
January 31, 1962*
February 9, 1962
February 9, 1962*
February 10, 1962
ANGLE, AT HOME SECURITY LIFE IN
SURANCE COMPANY, Durham
GOLDEN AGE THANKSGIVING BAN-
QUET, Raleigh
SECOND ANNUAL FARM POLICY RE-
VIEW CONFERENCE, Raleigh
MUSIC DAY OBSERVANCE, NORTH CARO-
LINA FEDERATION OF MUSIC CLUBS,
Raleigh
SPECIAL CONFERENCE OF SOUTHERN
REGIONAL EDUCATION BOARD, Louis-
ville, Kentucky
THIRTEENTH ANNUAL CONFERENCE
ON EDUCATION FOR EXCEPTIONAL
CHILDREN, Winston-Salem
DEDICATORY ADDRESS AT CHARLES B.
AYCOCK SCHOOL, Pikeville
REMARKS TO AMERICAN GOVERNMENT
CLASSES FROM DUKE UNIVERSITY, Ra-
leigh
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA
ALUMNI BANQUET HONORING DR.
FRANK P. GRAHAM, New York City
NORTH CAROLINA SOCIETY OF NEW
YORK, New York City
CHARLOTTE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE,
Charlotte
INTRODUCTION OF ALLEN H. SEED, JR.,
TO RALEIGH GARDEN CLUB, Raleigh
REMARKS TO TEEN-DEMS, Raleigh
CHAPEL PROGRAM AT METHODIST
HOME, Charlotte
FORMAL DEDICATION, NORTH AND
SOUTH CAROLINA REGIONAL OFFICE,
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Char-
lotte
OPENING OF LINDSAY C. WARREN
BRIDGE ACROSS ALLIGATOR RIVER
FROM TYRRELL COUNTY TO DARE
COUNTY, East Lake
NORTH CAROLINA CEMETERY ASSOCI-
ATION, Pinehurst
OPENING DAY CEREMONIES, BASF
COLORS AND CHEMICALS, INC., Charlotte
List of Omitted Speeches
499
February 12, 1962*
February 16, 1962
February 18, 1962*
February 20, 1962*
February 20, 1962*
February 20, 1962*
February 20, 1962*
February 20, 1962*
February 20, 1962*
February 20, 1962*
February 20, 1962*
February 20, 1962*
February 20, 1962*
February 23, 1962*
February 24, 1962*
February 27, 1962*
March 2, 1962*
March 2, 1962*
March 2, 1962*
COMMENTS TO THE MEN OF THE EDEN-
TON STREET METHODIST CHURCH,
Raleigh
DEDICATORY ADDRESS AT FAYETTE-
VILLE AREA INDUSTRIAL EDUCATION
CENTER, Fayetteville
THE CONGREGATION OF WRIGHTS-
VILLE METHODIST CHURCH, Wrightsville
Beach
EDUCATION RALLY, HORTON HIGH
SCHOOL, Pittsboro
EDUCATION RALLY, PITTSBORO HIGH
SCHOOL, Pittsboro
EDUCATION RALLY, CHATHAM HIGH
SCHOOL, Siler City
EDUCATION RALLY, JORDAN MAT- '
THEWS SCHOOL, Siler City
EDUCATION RALLY, CHATHAM CEN-
TRAL HIGH SCHOOL, Bear Creek
EDUCATION RALLY, ELISE HIGH
SCHOOL, Robbins
EDUCATION RALLY, PINCKNEY HIGH
SCHOOL, Carthage
EDUCATION RALLY, CARTHAGE HIGH
SCHOOL, Carthage
EDUCATION RALLY, ABERDEEN HIGH
SCHOOL, Aberdeen
EDUCATION RALLY, LEAK STREET
SCHOOL, Rockingham
DINNER FOR CHARLOTTE YWCA BUILD-
ING CAMPAIGN, Charlotte
PHI ALPHA DELTA DISTRICT CONVEN-
TION, Winston-Salem
AGRICULTURE COUNCIL JOINT PRO-
GRAM, Raleigh
EDUCATION RALLY, WEST EDGECOMBE
SCHOOL, Rocky Mount
EDUCATION RALLY, TARBORO HIGH
SCHOOL, Tarboro
EDUCATION RALLY, CARVER HIGH
SCHOOL, Pinetops
500
March 2, 1962*
March 2, 1962*
March 2, 1962*
March 2, 1962*
March 2, 1962*
March 3, 1962*
March 6, 1962*
March 7, 1962*
March 7, 1962
March 8, 1962
March 8, 1962*
March 9, 1962*
March 12, 1962*
March 14, 1962*
March 16, 1962*
March 17, 1962*
March 18, 1962*
March 19, 1962*
March 19, 1962*
Papers of Terry Sanford
EDUCATION RALLY, ELM CITY HIGH
SCHOOL, Elm City
EDUCATION RALLY, SPEIGHT SCHOOL,
Saratoga
EDUCATION RALLY, SARATOGA CEN-
TRAL SCHOOL, Saratoga
EDUCATION RALLY, GREENE COUNTY
CENTRAL SCHOOL, Snow Hill
EDUCATION RALLY, GREENE COUNTY
TRAINING SCHOOL, Snow Hill
NORTH CAROLINA AFL-CIO MEETING,
Raleigh
CUMBERLAND COUNTY BAR ASSOCL
ATION, Fayetteville
COMMENTS AT OPEN HOUSE, BURLING-
TON-ALAMANCE INDUSTRIAL EDUCA-
TION CENTER, Burlington
ANNUAL MEETING, WINSTON-SALEM
TRAFFIC CLUB, Winston-Salem
ELON COLLEGE FOUNDERS DAY PRO-
GRAM, Elon College
STATE STUDENT LEGISLATURE AT
NORTH CAROLINA STATE COLLEGE, Ra-
leigh
GREETINGS AT AMERICAN LEGION
ORATORICAL CONTEST, Lexington
DEMOCRATIC RALLY, Asheboro
CLAYTON WOMEN'S CLUB, Clayton
EAST CAROLINA COLLEGE ALUMNI
BREAKFAST, Raleigh
NORTH CAROLINA JUNIOR CHAMBER
OF COMMERCE OUTSTANDING YOUNG
FARMER AWARD PRESENTATION, Wil-
son
NORTH CAROLINA B'NAI B'RITH CON-
VENTION, Fayetteville
MEREDITH COLLEGE STUDENTS, Raleigh
EDUCATION RALLY, E. E. SMITH
SCHOOL, Kenansville
March 19, 1962*
EDUCATION RALLY, KENANSVILLE ELE-
MENTARY SCHOOL, Kenansville
List of Omitted Speeches
501
March 20, 1962*
March 20, 1962*
March 20, 1962*
March 20, 1962*
March 20,
March 20,
March 20,
March 20,
March 20,
March 21,
March 21,
March 22,
March 24,
March 27,
March 27,
March 27,
March 27,
1962*
1962*
1962*
1962*
1962*
1962*
1962
1962*
1962*
1962*
1962*
1962*
1962*
March 27, 1962*
March 27, 1962*
March 27, 1962*
March 27, 1962*
EDUCATION RALLY, POPE HIGH
SCHOOL, Burgaw
BURGAW HIGH SCHOOL, Burgaw
PENDERLEA HIGH SCHOOL, Willard
EDUCATION RALLY, UNION HIGH
SCHOOL, Clinton
EDUCATION RALLY, CLINTON HIGH
SCHOOL, Clinton
EDUCATION RALLY, SAMPSON COUNTY
HIGH SCHOOL, Clinton
EDUCATION RALLY, ROSEBORO-SALEM-
BURG HIGH SCHOOL, Salemburg
EDUCATION RALLY, HOBBTON HIGH
SCHOOL, Newton Grove
MEN OF THE CHURCH OF THE GOOD
SHEPHERD, Raleigh
NORTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC MEMBER-
SHIP ASSOCIATION, Raleigh
NORTH CAROLINA CITIZENS COMMIT-
TEE, Raleigh
O. MAX GARDNER AWARD DINNER,
Greensboro
GOVERNOR'S CONFERENCE FOR FOR-
EIGN STUDENTS, Raleigh
EDUCATION RALLY, NEWBOLD HIGH
SCHOOL, Denver
EDUCATION RALLY, JASPER HIGH
SCHOOL, New Bern
EDUCATION RALLY, BARBER HIGH
SCHOOL, New Bern
EDUCATION RALLY, NEW BERN HIGH
SCHOOL, New Bern
EDUCATION RALLY, PAMLICO TRAIN-
ING SCHOOL, Bayboro
EDUCATION RALLY, PAMLICO HIGH
SCHOOL, Bayboro
EDUCATION RALLY, FARM LIFE HIGH
SCHOOL, Vanceboro
EDUCATION RALLY, SAMPSON ELE-
MENTARY SCHOOL, Kinston
502
Papers of Terry Sanford
March
March
March
March
March
March
March
March
March
March
March
27, 1962*
28, 1962*
28, 1962*
28, 1962*
28, 1962*
28, 1962*
28, 1962*
28, 1962*
28, 1962*
29, 1962
31, 1962
March 31, 1962
April 2, 1962
April 4, 1962*
April 4, 1962*
April 5, 1962
April 5, 1962*
April 5, 1962*
April 5, 1962*
EDUCATION RALLY, GRAINGER HIGH
SCHOOL, Kinston
EDUCATION RALLY, JONES HIGH
SCHOOL, Trenton
EDUCATION RALLY, JONES CENTRAL
HIGH SCHOOL, Trenton
EDUCATION RALLY, RICHLANDS HIGH
SCHOOL, Richlands
EDUCATION RALLY, JACKSONVILLE
HIGH SCHOOL, Jacksonville
EDUCATION RALLY, GEORGETOWN
HIGH SCHOOL, Jacksonville
EDUCATION RALLY, SWANSBORO HIGH
SCHOOL, Swansboro
EDUCATION RALLY, HAVELOCK HIGH
SCHOOL, Havelock
EDUCATION RALLY, BEAUFORT HIGH
SCHOOL, BEAUFORT
VIRGINIA PUBLIC RELATIONS CONFER-
ENCE, Williamsburg, Virginia
STATE CONVENTION, NORTH CARO-
LINA ASSOCIATION OF FUTURE HOME-
MAKERS OF AMERICA. Raleigh
INTRODUCTION OF ROBERT F. WAG-
NER, MAYOR OF NEW YORK CITY, AT
JEFFERSON-JACKSON DAY DINNER, Ra-
leigh
QUARTERLY MEETING OF BOARD OF
CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT,
New Bern
VANCE COUNTY NCEA BANQUET, Hen-
derson
VANCE COUNTY EDUCATION RALLY,
Henderson
CAROLINAS UNITED FUND REGIONAL
MEETING, Raleigh
DEDICATORY ADDRESS AT LAURIN-
BURG ARMORY, Laurinburg
SOUTHERN REGIONAL TRAVEL COUN-
CIL, Charlotte
INTRODUCTION OF ORVILLE FREEMAN,
SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE, AT
MECKLENBURG COUNTY DEMOCRATIC
RALLY, Charlotte
List of Omitted Speeches
503
April 8, 1962* DEDICATION CEREMONY, MECKLEN-
BURG COLLEGE, Charlotte
April 9, 1962* HIGH POINT COLLEGE YOUNG DEMO-
CRATIC CLUB, High Point
April 12, 1962* INAUGURAL CEREMONIES FOR PRESI-
DENT OF ST. ANDREWS COLLEGE, Laur-
inburg
April 13, 1962* PAMLICO-ALBEMARLE SCHOOLMASTERS
CLUB, Pantego
April 14, 1962* NORTH CAROLINA VOCATIONAL AS-
SOCIATION, Raleigh
April 16, 1962* EDUCATION RALLY, SHELBY SENIOR
HIGH SCHOOL, Shelby
April 16, 1962* EDUCATION RALLY, CLEVELAND HIGH
SCHOOL, Shelby
April 16, 1962* EDUCATION RALLY, SHELBY JUNIOR
HIGH SCHOOL, Shelby
April 18, 1962 GRAND LODGE PAGEANT, Raleigh
April 19, 1962* FARM CREDIT DISTRICT MEETING,
Raleigh
April 19, 1962* SOUTHERN MUNICIPAL AND INDUS-
TRIAL WASTE CONFERENCE, Chapel Hill
April 26, 1962 DEDICATION LUNCHEON FOR FUTOR-
lAN-STRATFORD FURNITURE COMPANY
PLANT, Rocky Mount
April 26, 1962 FORSYTH COUNTY SCHOOL BANQUET,
Winston-Salem
April 27, 1962 DEDICATION OF THE ASHEVILLE IN-
DUSTRIAL EDUCATION CENTER, Ashe-
ville
May 4, 1962* INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EM-
PLOYMENT SECURITY COMMISSION PER-
SONNEL, Raleigh
May 4, 1962* DISTRICT CONVENTION OF OPTIMISTS
CLUBS, Durham
May 9, 1962 ANNUAL INSTALLATION BANQUET,
HENDERSON JUNIOR CHAMBER OF
COMMERCE, Henderson
May 10, 1962 DEDICATION OF LINDSAY C. WARREN
BRIDGE, Columbia
May 10, 1962 PERQUIMANS COUNTY DEMOCRATIC
RALLY, Hertford
504
May 12, 1962*
May 14, 1962*
May 14, 1962*
May 15, 1962
May 15, 1962*
May 17, 1962
May 25, 1962*
May 27, 1962*
May 29, 1962
June 2, 1962
June 4, 1962
June 10, 1962*
June 12, 1962
June 12, 1962*
June 16, 1962*
June 23, 1962
June 26, 1962
Papers of Terry Sanford
ANNUAL DINNER OF NORTH CAROLINA
SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON, D.C., Wash-
ington, D.C.
CONFERENCE ON JUVENILE DELIN-
QUENCY, Chapel Hill
DEDICATION OF NEW CREDIT UNION
BUILDING, Raleigh
GREETINGS AT BUSINESS AND INDUS-
TRY'S SALUTE TO CAMPBELL COLLEGE,
Raleigh
ANNUAL AGRICULTURE
CONFERENCE, Asheville
EXTENSION
INTRODUCTION OF JAMES E. WEBB,
ADMINISTRATOR OF NATIONAL AERO-
NAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION,
AT DUKE UNIVERSITY SYMPOSIUM ON
SPACE RESEARCH, Durham
CATHEY CLUB OF NORTH CAROLINA
STATE SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND, Raleigh
HOMECOMING SERVICE OF MOUNT
ZION METHODIST CHURCH, Cornelius
HIGHWAY SAFETY MEETING ON PROJ-
ECT IMPACT, Raleigh
NORTH CAROLINA STATE COLLEGE
COMMENCEMENT, Raleigh
GREETINGS AT UNIVERSITY OF NORTH
CAROLINA COMMENCEMENT EXER-
CISES, Chapel Hill
ANNUAL CONVENTION OF NORTH
CAROLINA REGISTER OF DEEDS ASSOCL
ATION, Hendersonville
FUNERAL DIRECTORS AND MORTL
CIANS ASSOCIATION, Raleigh
INSTITUTE FOR MENTAL HEALTH
BUSINESS ADMINISTRATORS, Raleigh
INTRODUCTION OF SARGENT SHRIVER,
DIRECTOR OF PEACE CORPS, AT TEEN-
DEMS CONVENTION, Raleigh
DEDICATION OF WILMINGTON CAUS-
TIC SODA TERMINAL, Wilmington
NORTH CAROLINA A.B.C. LAW EN-
FORCEMENT OFFICERS ASSOCIATION,
Carolina Beach
List of Omitted Speeches
505
June 29, 1962
July 6, 1962
July 14, 1962
July 16, 1962
July 17, 1962
August 1, 1962*
August 2, 1962*
August 8, 1962
August 10, 1962*
August 20, 1962*
August 27, 1962
August 29, 1962*
September 4, 1962*
September 4. 1962*
September 4, 1962*
September 4, 1962*
September 4, 1962*
September 4, 1962*
September 5, 1962*
ANNUAL MEETING OF ROANOKE-CHO-
WAN AUTHORS, ARTISTS, AND MU-
SICANS, Pendleton
DEDICATION OF IDEAL CEMENT COM-
PANY PLANT, Castle Hayne
DEDICATION OF NEW WATERSIDE
THEATER, Manteo
CONVENTION BANQUET, NORTH CARO-
LINA SEEDMEN'S ASSOCIATION, Blowing
Rock
OPENING OF CANTRELL, AND COCH-
RANE, LTD., PLANT, Charlotte
ANNUAL MINERAL AND GEM FESTIVAL,
Spruce Pine
NORTH CAROLINA TRADE FAIR LUNCH-
EON, Charlotte
CONFERENCE ON CHRISTIAN EDUCA-
TION AND CHRISTIAN YOUTH COUN-
CIL, Salisbury
AGRIBUSINESS CARAVAN LUNCHEON,
Raleigh
ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING OF OUTER
BANKS SEASHORE PARK COMMISSION,
Nags Head
FOOD BROKERS DINNER, Raleigh
"MADE IN NORTH CAROLINA" DAY, EX-
HIBITION OF PRODUCTS FROM 100
NORTH CAROLINA MANUFACTURERS,
Hollywood, Florida
EDUCATION RALLY, KNOTTS ISLAND
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, Knotts Island
DEDICATION OF KNOTTS ISLAND
FERRY, Knotts Island
EDUCATION RALLY, KNAPP HIGH
SCHOOL, Currituck
EDUCATION RALLY, CAMDEN HIGH
SCHOOL, Camden
EDUCATION RALLY, MARIAN ANDER-
SON HIGH SCHOOL, Belcross
ELIZABETH CITY STATE TEACHERS
COLLEGE, Elizabeth City
EDUCATION RALLY, PASQUOTANK ELE-
MENTARY SCHOOL, Elizabeth City
506
Papers of Terry Sanford
September 5, 1962*
September 5, 1962*
September 5, 1962*
September 5, 1962*
September 5, 1962*
September 5, 1962*
September 5, 1962*
September 5, 1962*
September 7, 1962*
September 8, 1962
September 12, 1962
September 14, 1962*
September 14, 1962*
September 14, 1962*
September 14, 1962*
September 14, 1962*
September 14, 1962*
September 14, 1962*
September 16, 1962*
EDUCATION RALLY, ELIZABETH CITY
HIGH SCHOOL, Elizabeth City
EDUCATION RALLY, P. W. MOORE HIGH
SCHOOL, Elizabeth City
EDUCATION RALLY, PASQUOTANK CEN-
TRAL HIGH SCHOOL, Elizabeth City
EDUCATION RALLY, PERQUIMANS UN-
ION HIGH SCHOOL, Winfall
EDUCATION RALLY, PERQUIMANS HIGH
SCHOOL, Hertford
EDUCATION RALLY, EDENTON HIGH
SCHOOL, Edenton
EDUCATION RALLY, CHOWAN HIGH
SCHOOL, Tyner
EDUCATION RALLY, WHITE OAK ELE-
MENTARY SCHOOL, Tyner
REMARKS TO DEMOCRATIC NOMINEES
FOR NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL AS-
SEMBLY, Raleigh
CHARLES M. GOLD APPRECIATION
NIGHT, Rutherfordton
DEDICATION OF CAROLINA POWER
AND LIGHT COMPANY STEAM ELEC-
TRIC GENERATING PLANT, Goldsboro
EDUCATION RALLY, FARMVILLE HIGH
SCHOOL, Farmville
EDUCATION RALLY, H. B. SUGG HIGH
SCHOOL, Farmville
EDUCATION RALLY, EAST CAROLINA
COLLEGE AND GREENVILLE CITY
SCHOOLS, Greenville
EDUCATION RALLY, ROBINSON HIGH
SCHOOL, Winterville
EDUCATION RALLY, WINTERVILLE
HIGH SCHOOL, Winterville
EDUCATION RALLY, AYDEN HIGH
SCHOOL, Ayden
EDUCATION RALLY, SOUTH AYDEN
HIGH SCHOOL, Ayden
DEDICATION CEREMONIES FOR WILKES-
BORO DAM AND RESERVOIR, North
Wilkesboro
List of Omitted Speeches
507
September 17, 1962*
September 17, 1962*
September 17, 1962*
September 17, 1962*
September 17, 1962*
September 17, 1962*
September 17, 1962*
September 17, 1962*
September 18, 1962*
September 18, 1962
September 24, 1962*
September 24, 1962*
September 24, 1962*
September 24, 1962*
September 24, 1962*
September 24, 1962*
September 24, 1962*
September 24, 1962*
September 24, 1962*
September 25, 1962*
EDUCATION RALLY, WEST WILKES
HIGH SCHOOL, North Wilkesboro
EDUCATION RALLY, LINCOLN HIGH
SCHOOL, Wilkesboro
EDUCATION RALLY, WILKES CENTRAL
HIGH SCHOOL, North Wilkesboro
EDUCATION RALLY, SPARTA HIGH
SCHOOL, Sparta
EDUCATION RALLY, PINEY CREEK HIGH
SCHOOL, Piney Creek
EDUCATION RALLY, ASHE CENTRAL
HIGH SCHOOL, Jefferson
EDUCATION RALLY, BEAVER CREEK
HIGH SCHOOL, West Jefferson
EDUCATION RALLY, APPALACHIAN STA-
DIUM, Boone
BOARD OF DIRECTORS, NORTH CARO-
LINA NATIONAL BANK, Raleigh
FOURTH ANNUAL BANQUET OF APEX
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, Apex
EDUCATION RALLY, GRANITE FALLS
HIGH SCHOOL, Granite Falls i
EDUCATION RALLY, HUDSON HIGH
SCHOOL, Hudson
EDUCATION RALLY, LENOIR HIGH
SCHOOL, Lenoir
EDUCATION RALLY, FREEDMAN ELE-
MENTARY SCHOOL, Lenoir
EDUCATION RALLY, BANNER ELK
SCHOOL, Banner Elk
EDUCATION RALLY, CROSSNORE
SCHOOL, Crossnore
EDUCATION RALLY, HARRIS HIGH
SCHOOL, Spruce Pine
EDUCATION RALLY, BOWMAN SCHOOL,
Bakersville
EDUCATION RALLY, EAST YANCEY
HIGH SCHOOL, BURNSVILLE
EDUCATION RALLY, MARION HIGH
SCHOOL, Marion
508
Papers of Terry Sanford
September 25, 1962*
September 25, 1962*
September 25, 1962*
September 25, 1962*
September 25, 1962*
September 25, 1962*
September 25, 1962*
September 26, 1962*
September 26, 1962*
September 26, 1962*
September 26, 1962*
September 26, 1962*
September 26, 1962*
September 26, 1962*
September 26, 1962*
September 26, 1962*
September 26, 1962*
September 27, 1962*
September 27, 1962
September 28, 1962*
September 28, 1962*
EDUCATION RALLY, GLEN ALPINE
HIGH SCHOOL, Glen Alpine
EDUCATION RALLY, OLIVE HILL HIGH
SCHOOL, Morganton
EDUCATION RALLY, MORGANTON HIGH
SCHOOL, Morganton
EDUCATION RALLY, VALDESE HIGH
SCHOOL, Valdese
EDUCATION RALLY, MONROE AUDL
TORIUM, Hickory
EDUCATION RALLY, ST. STEPHENS
HIGH SCHOOL, Catawba
EDUCATION RALLY, ROSENWALD HIGH
SCHOOL, Catawba
EDUCATION RALLY, TAYLORSVILLE
GYMNASIUM, Taylorsville
EDUCATION RALLY, HAPPY PLAINS
GYMTORIUM, Taylorsville
EDUCATION RALLY, HIDDENITE HIGH
SCHOOL, Hiddenite
EDUCATION RALLY, STATESVILLE HIGH
SCHOOL, Statesville
EDUCATION RALLY, UNITY HIGH
SCHOOL, Statesville
EDUCATION RALLY, HARMONY SCHOOL,
Harmony
EDUCATION RALLY, YADKINVILLE
SCHOOL, Yadkinville
EDUCATION RALLY, BOONVILLE
SCHOOL, Boonville
EDUCATION RALLY, YADKIN HIGH
SCHOOL, Boonville
NEWTON LIONS CLUB, Newton
OPENING OF NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL
INSURANCE COMPANY BUILDING, Ra-
leigh
ANNUAL MEETING, NORTH CAROLINA
PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATION, Raleigh
EDUCATION RALLY, MERRICK-MOORE
HIGH SCHOOL, Durham
EDUCATION RALLY, HILLSIDE HIGH
SCHOOL, Durham
List of Omitted Speeches
509
September 28, 1962*
September 28, 1962*
September 28, 1962*
September 28, 1962*
September 28, 1962*
September 28, 1962*
September 28, 1962*
October 4, 1962*
October 6, 1962*
October 6, 1962*
October 1, 1962*
October 7, 1962*
October 10, 1962*
October 11, 1962*
October 12, 1962*
October 12, 1962*
October 13, 1962*
October 14, 1962*
October 15, 1962*
October 15, 1962*
EDUCATION RALLY, DURHAM HIGH
SCHOOL, Durham
EDUCATION RALLY, NORTHERN HIGH
SCHOOL, Durham
EDUCATION RALLY, PERSON COUNTY
HIGH SCHOOL, Roxboro
EDUCATION RALLY, ROXBORO HIGH
SCHOOL, Roxboro
EDUCATION RALLY, HILLSBORO HIGH
SCHOOL, Hillsboro
EDUCATION RALLY, CENTRAL SCHOOL,
Hillsboro
EDUCATION RALLY, CHAPEL HILL
HIGH SCHOOL, Chapel Hill
STATE AFL^CIO CONVENTION, Raleigh
NORTH CAROLINA DEMOCRATIC WO-
MEN'S LUNCHEON, Asheville
INTRODUCTION OF BERT COMBS, GOV-
ERNOR OF KENTUCKY, AT VANCE-AY-
COCK DINNER, Asheville
NORTH CAROLINA BOTTLERS ASSOCI
ATION, INC., Asheville
NORTH CAROLINA ASSOCIATION OF
INSURANCE AGENTS, Pinehurst
THIRD CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT DEM-
OCRATIC RALLY, Beaufort
FOURTH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT
DEMOCRATIC RALLY, Lexington
DEDICATORY ADDRESS AT CORNING
GLASS PLANT, Raleigh
SIXTH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT DEM-
OCRATIC RALLY, Greensboro
REMARKS TO INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERS
AND CONSULTANTS, Asheville
HOMECOMING DAY SERVICES, EDGER
TON MEMORIAL METHODIST CHURCH,
Selma
YOUNG DEMOCRATIC CLUBS RALLY,
Statesville
GOVERNOR'S COMMITTEE ON EMPLOY-
MENT OF THE HANDICAPPED, Asheville
510
Papers of Terry Sanford
October 17, 1962* GOVERNOR'S TRAFFIC SAFETY MAN-
AGEMENT CONFERENCE, INSTITUTE OF
GOVERNMENT, Chapel Hill
October 18, 1962* FIFTH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT DEM-
OCRATIC RALLY, Dobson
October 22, 1962* NINTH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT DEM-
OCRATIC RALLY, Concord
October 23, 1962* EIGHTH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT
DEMOCRATIC RALLY, Rockingham
October 24, 1962 DEDICATION OF NUCLEAR POWER
PLANT, Parr, South Carolina
October 24, 1962* ELEVENTH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT
DEMOCRATIC RALLY, Asheville
October 25, 1962* TENTH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT
DEMOCRATIC RALLY, Hickory
October 26, 1962* DEDICATION OF NORTH CAROLINA
BAR CENTER, Raleigh
October 27, 1962 DEMOCRATIC PRECINCT RALLY,
STANLY COUNTY, New London
October 28, 1962 REMARKS TO TRAFFIC SESSION, NA-
TIONAL SAFETY CONGRESS (delivered by
telephone) , Chicago, Illinois
October 30, 1962* SEVENTH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT
DEMOCRATIC RALLY, Lumberton
October 31, 1962* DEDICATION OF FARMERS COOPER-
ATIVE EXCHANGE MILL, Farmville
October 31, 1962* SECOND CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT
DEMOCRATIC RALLY, Roanoke Rapids
November 1, 1962 NATIONAL CONVENTION OF LITTLE
PEOPLE OF AMERICA, INC., Asheville
November I, 1962* GOVERNOR'S CONFERENCE ON AREA
REDEVELOPMENT, Asheville
November 3, 1962* GOVERNOR'S CONFERENCE ON AREA
REDEVELOPMENT, Raleigh
November 8, 1962 DEDICATION OF COOPER D. CASS BUILD-
ING, Winston-Salem
November 13, 1962 PROCESSED FOODS LUNCHEON, Raleigh
November 14, 1962 ANNUAL MEETING OF THE NEW YORK
CHAPTER, UNIVERSITY OF NORTH
CAROLINA ALUMNI ASSOCIATION, New
York City
List of Omitted Speeches
511
November 16, 1962
November 16, 1962
November 17, 1962*=
November 21, 1962
November 26, 1962
December 1, 1962*
December 5, 1962*
December 6, 1962*
December 7, 1962
December 7, 1962
December 12, 1962*
January 12, 1963*
January 18, 1963
January 18, 1963
January 28, 1963*
January 30, 1963*
February 9, 1963
February 10, 1963*
DEDICATION OF HOSPITAL CARE AS-
SOCIATION OFFICE BUILDING, Durham
THIRTY-FIFTH ANNUAL CONVENTION
OF THE CONGRESS OF COLORED PAR-
ENTS AND TEACHERS, Gastonia
DEDICATION OF WILLIAM D. CARML
CHAEL GYMNASIUM, NORTH CAROLINA
STATE COLLEGE, Raleigh
ANNUAL RADIO AND TELEVISION
AWARDS LUNCHEON, Raleigh
ANNUAL MEETING, NORTH CAROLINA
FARM BUREAU, Asheville
VIRGINIA MILLS, Swepsonville
DUKE UNIVERSITY POLITICAL SCIENCE
STUDENTS, Raleigh
ROUGHEDGE FARMERS CLUB ANNUAL
LADIES NIGHT BANQUET, Roughedge
WINGATE COLLEGE, Wingate
CAROLINAS-VIRGINIA PURCHASING
AGENTS ASSOCIATION, Pinehurst
DEDICATION OF PARKWOOD SHOPPING
CENTER, Raleigh
ANNUAL INSTALLATION MEETING,
STATE YOUNG DEMOCRATIC CLUBS OF-
FICERS, Goldsboro
NORTH CAROLINA PRESS ASSOCIATION,
Chapel Hill
INTRODUCTION OF JAMES E. WEBB,
ADMINISTRATOR OF NATIONAL AERO-
NAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION,
AT EIGHTY-THIRD ANNUAL BANQUET
OF THE CHARLOTTE CHAMBER OF
COMMERCE, Charlotte
ADDRESS TO CONSERVATION AND DE-
VELOPMENT BOARD, Durham
NORTH CAROLINA TRAFFIC SAFETY
MEETING, Raleigh
SECOND HEALTH CAREERS CONGRESS,
Durham
RECEPTION HONORING AVRAHAM HAR-
MAN, AMBASSADOR FROM ISRAEL, Dur-
ham
512
February 11, 1963*
February 11, 1963*
February 12, 1963
February 14, 1963*
February 22, 1963*
February 22, 1963*
February 24, 1963*
February 28, 1963*
February 28, 1963*
February 28, 1963*
March 1, 1963*
March 1,
March 1,
March 1,
March 1,
March 1,
March 1,
March 1,
March 1,
March 2,
1963*
1963*
1963*
1963*
1963*
1963*
1963*
1963*
1963*
Papers of Terry Sanford
INSTITUTE FOR PAROLE BOARD MEM-
BERS, INSTITUTE OF GOVERNMENT,
Chapel Hill
LAURINBURG NCEA BANQUET, Laurin-
burg
SIR WALTER CABINET, Raleigh
DISTRICT BETA CLUB MEETING, Mur-
freesboro
DEDICATION OF CUTLAR MOORE
BRIDGE, Lumberton
DEDICATION OF ED J. GLOVER FIRE
STATION, Lumberton
BROTHERHOOD DAY SERVICE, WHITE
ROCK BAPTIST CHURCH, Durham
EDUCATION RALLY, CHAPEL HILL
HIGH SCHOOL, Chapel Hill
EDUCATION RALLY, LINCOLN HIGH
SCHOOL, Chapel Hill
YOUNG TURKS DINNER, Greensboro
EDUCATION RALLY, ROSEWOOD HIGH
SCHOOL, Goldsboro
EDUCATION RALLY, Fremont High School,
Fremont
EDUCATION RALLY, NEW HOPE HIGH
SCHOOL, Goldsboro
EDUCATION RALLY, GOLDSBORO HIGH
SCHOOL, Goldsboro
EDUCATION RALLY, DILLARD HIGH
SCHOOL, Goldsboro
EDUCATION RALLY, CARVER SCHOOL,
Mount Olive
EDUCATION RALLY, MOUNT OLIVE
HIGH SCHOOL, Mount Olive
SCIENCE FAIR, GOLDSBORO JUNIOR
HIGH SCHOOL, Goldsboro
WAYNE COUNTY UNIT OF NCEA, Golds-
boro
WELCOMING JAYCEES TO RALEIGH, Ra-
leigh
List of Omittep Speeches
513
March 7, 1963*
March 8, 1963
March 8, 1963*
March 12, 1963*
March 13, 1963*
March 14, 1963*
March 21, 1963
March 23, 1963*
March 26, 1963*
March 27, 1963*
April 9, 1963
April 20, 1963*
April 22, 1963
April 22, 1963*
April 23, 1963*
April 24, 1963*
April 27, 1963*
April 30, 1963*
April 30, 1963*
NORTH CAROLINA MENTAL HEALTH
ASSOCIATION BANQUET, Raleigh
NORTH CAROLINA MENTAL HEALTH
LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE, Raleigh
NORTH CAROLINA CITIZENS COMMIT-
TEE FOR BETTER SCHOOLS, Chapel Hill
LENOIR COUNTY INDUSTRIAL EDU-
CATION CENTER BANQUET, Kinston
SEVENTH ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON
OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH, Charlotte
WOMAN'S NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC
CLUB, Washington, D.C.
REMARKS ON FORTHCOMING ANNIVER-
SARY OF THE BATTLE OF GETTYSBURG,
Raleigh
DINNER HONORING H. CLIFTON BLUE,
SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRE-
SENTATIVES, NORTH CAROLINA GEN-
ERAL ASSEMBLY, Carthage
JUNIOR HIGH
JOSEPHUS DANIELS
SCHOOL PTA, Raleigh
STATE COUNCIL MEETING OF HOME
DEMONSTRATION CLUBS, Raleigh
WHITE HOUSE MEETING ON THE AP-
PALACHIAN REGION (presented by George
M. Stephens, Jr.) , Washington, D.C.
THE ARKANSAS YOUNG DEMOCRATIC
CLUBS, North Little Rock, Arkansas
DEDICATION OF CRAVEN COUNTY HOS
PITAL, New Bern
QUARTERLY MEETING OF THE CONSER-
VATION AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
Greenville
STATE SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND, Raleigh
DEDICATION OF RANDOLPH INDUS-
TRIAL EDUCATION CENTER, Asheboro
LAW DAY BANQUET, Winston-Salem
NORTH CAROLINA AUTOMOBILE DEAL-
ERS ASSOCIATION, Pinehurst
GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT CON-
FERENCE, NORTH CAROLINA INTER-
NATIONAL TRADE FAIR, Charlotte
514
May 2, 1963*
May 3, 1963*
May 8, 1963*
May 8, 1963*
May 8, 1963*
May 8, 1963*
May 8, 1963*
May 8, 1963*
May 10, 1963
May 16, 1963*
May 17, 1963*
May 22, 1963*
May 26, 1963
June 1, 1963*
June 2, 1963*
June 8, 1963*
June 16, 1963*
June 18, 1963*
June 19, 1963*
June 21, 1963*
Papers of Terry Sanford
SOUTHERN TRUST CONFERENCE, Char-
lotte
NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL FOOD
SERVICE ASSOCIATION, Raleigh
EDUCATION RALLY, NORTH ROWAN
HIGH SCHOOL, Spencer
EDUCATION RALLY, DUNBAR HIGH
SCHOOL, Spencer
EDUCATION RALLY, EAST ROWAN
HIGH SCHOOL, Salisbury
EDUCATION RALLY, BOYDEN HIGH
SCHOOL, Salisbury
EDUCATION RALLY, SETZER SCHOOL,
Salisbury
EDUCATION RALLY, PRICE HIGH
SCHOOL, Salisbury
DIAMOND JUBILEE CELEBRATION, PEM-
BROKE STATE COLLEGE, Pembroke
DEDICATION OF GORDON FOODS
PLANT, Raleigh
SECOND STATE CONFERENCE ON PRO-
GRAMS FOR EXCEPTIONALLY TAL-
ENTED CHILDREN, Charlotte
POULTRY PROCESSORS ASSOCIATION,
Raleigh
ELIZABETH CITY STATE TEACHERS
COLLEGE, Elizabeth City
GRADUATION EXERCISES, NORTH
CAROLINA STATE COLLEGE, Raleigh
GRADUATION EXERCISES,
COLLEGE, Greensboro
WOMAN'S
STATE CONVENTION OF VETERANS OF
FOREIGN WARS, Asheville
NORTH CAROLINA BOYS STATE, INSTI-
TUTE OF GOVERNMENT, Chapel Hill
WESTERN ELECTRIC AWARDS CERE-
MONIES AND LUNCHEON, Greensboro
DEDICATION OF PEDEN STEEL BUILD-
ING, Raleigh
STATE AMERICAN LEGION CONVEN-
TION, Charlotte
List of Omitted Speeches
515
June 24, 1963*
June 25, 1963*
June 26, 1963*
July 1, 1963*
July 17, 1963*
July 23, 1963*
August 19, 1963
August 19, 1963
September 6, 1963*
September 18, 1963
September 25, 1963*
October 1, 1963*
October 3, 1963
October 11, 1963*
October 15, 1963*
CITIZENS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION
AWARDS CEREMONIES, Smithfield
GOVERNOR'S YOUTH FITNESS CONFER-
ENCE BANQUET, Raleigh
DEDICATION OF VIRGINIA ELECTRIC
AND POWER COMPANY'S GASTON DAM,
Roanoke Rapids
REDEDICATION OF NORTH CAROLINA
MONUMENT AT GETTYSBURG BATTLE-
GROUND, Gettysburg, Pennsylvania
REMARKS AT PERFORMANCE OF THE
LOST COLONY (ATTENDED WITH AL-
BERTIS S. HARRISON, JR., GOVERNOR
OF VIRGINIA) , Manteo
SOUTHERN REGIONAL EDUCATION
BOARD LUNCHEON, Miami, Florida
SOUTHERN GOVERNORS CONFERENCE
ON SPECIAL SOUTHERN REGIONAL EDU-
CATION BOARD REPORT ON MENTAL
HEALTH, White Sulphur Springs, West Vir-
ginia
ANNUAL CONVENTION OF THE NORTH
CAROLINA ASSOCIATION OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS (delivered by Revenue
Commissioner W. A. Johnson), Raleigh
LUNCHEON WELCOMING SPRING MILLS
TO NORTH CAROLINA, Laurinburg
GOVERNOR'S COMMITTEE ON EMPLOY-
MENT OF THE HANDICAPPED, Raleigh
FORTY-FIFTH ANNUAL CONVENTION
OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF
STATE DEPARTMENTS OF AGRICUL-
TURE, Chapel Hill
NORTH CAROLINA MOTOR CARRIERS
ASSOCIATION, Pinehurst
REMARKS AT SYMBOLIC GROUND-
BREAKING CEREMONIES FOR NORTH
CAROLINA ARCHIVES AND HISTORY-
STATE LIBRARY BUILDING, Raleigh
WELCOMING ADDRESS TO NORTH
CAROLINA DEMOCRATIC WOMEN, Ra-
leigh
CHAPEL SERVICE, SOUTHEASTERN BAP-
TIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY, Wake
Forest
516
Papers of Terry Sanford
October 22, 1963
October 23, 1963
October 24, 1963*
October 25, 1963*
October 25, 1963*
October 25, 1963*
October 25, 1963*
October 25, 1963*
October 25, 1963*
October 25, 1963*
October 25, 1963*
November 1, 1963*
November 3, 1963*
November 6, 1963
November 14, 1963*
November 20, 1963*
January 10, 1964
January 11, 1964*
January 15, 1964
INDUSTRY APPRECIATION DAY, Mebane
UNITED NATIONS WORKSHOP, NORTH
CAROLINA STATE OF THE UNIVERSITY
OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh
TEACHERS APPRECIATION NIGHT, Elkin
EDUCATION RALLY, MORRESVILLE
HIGH SCHOOL, Mooresville
EDUCATION RALLY, DUNBAR HIGH
SCHOOL, Mooresville
EDUCATION RALLY, ROCK SPRINGS
HIGH SCHOOL, Denver
EDUCATION RALLY, NEWBOLD HIGH
SCHOOL, Lincolnton
EDUCATION RALLY, LINCOLNTON HIGH
SCHOOL, Lincolnton
EDUCATION RALLY, WEST LINCOLN
HIGH SCHOOL, Lincolnton
EDUCATION RALLY, CHERRYVILLE
HIGH SCHOOL, Cherryville
EDUCATION RALLY, CHAVIS HIGH
SCHOOL, Cherryville
BERTIE COUNTY TERCENTENARY CELE-
BRATION, Windsor
COLLEGE DAY AT CENTENARY METHO-
DIST CHURCH, Smithfield
THE ANNUAL MEETING OF WAKE
COUNTY RED CROSS CHAPTER, Raleigh
STUDENT BODY AND FACULTY OF
BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY, Waltham, Mass-
achusetts
CONFERENCE OF A.M.E. CHURCH,
NORTH CAROLINA COLLEGE, Durham
INTRODUCTION OF DOUGLAS Mac-
ARTHUR II, AMBASSADOR TO BELGIUM,
AT FOURTH ANNUAL FARM POLICY RE-
VIEW CONFERENCE, Raleigh
INTRODUCTION OF HENRY HALL WIL-
SON, ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT TO
THE PRESIDENT, AT STATE YOUNG
DEMOCRATIC CLUB MEETING, Southern
Pines
VIRGINIA ASSOCIATION FOR MENTAL
HEALTH, Richmond, Virginia
List of Omittei> Speeches
517
January 21, 1964*
January 23, 1964*
January 29, 1964
January 29, 1964*
January 31, 1964*
February 3, 1964*
February 16, 1964*
February 18, 1964*
March 2, 1964*
March 4, 1964*
March 7, 1964
March 11, 1964*
March 15, 1964*
March 17, 1964
March 30, 1964
April 7, 1964
April 8, 1964
April 8, 1964
FOOTBALL HALL OF FAME DINNER,
Durham
MOBILE HOME PARKS CONVENTION,
Raleigh
TESTIMONY BEFORE THE AGRICUL-
TURE SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE HOUSE
OF REPRESENTATIVES CONCERNING
NEED FOR TOBACCO RESEARCH, Wash-
ington, D.C.
ACHIEVEMENT AWARDS DINNER,
MONTGOMERY COUNTY INDUSTRIAL
SCHOOL, Troy
RALEIGH DISTRICT CONFERENCE OF
THE METHODIST CHURCH, Raleigh
ADDRESS TO BOARD OF CONSERVA-
TION AND DEVELOPMENT, Charlotte
COVENANT UNITED PRESBYTERIAN
CHURCH, Durham
COLLEGE OF WILLIAM AND MARY, Wil-
liamsburg, Virginia
UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS, Am-
herst, Massachusetts
PRINCETON UNIVERSITY, Princeton, New
Jersey
NORTH CAROLINA JUNIOR CHAMBER
OF COMMERCE, Raleigh
MEETING OF GREENSBORO UNITS OF
NCEA AND NCTA, Greensboro
METHODIST YOUTH FELLOWSHIP,
HAYES BARTON CHURCH, Raleigh
CHARLOTTE ROTARY CLUB, Charlotte
INTRODUCTION OF DR. BILLY GRAHAM
AT SPECIAL RECOGNITION DINNER
FOR CITY OF CHARLOTTE AND MECK-
LENBURG COUNTY OFFICIALS, Charlotte
REMARKS TO NATIONAL SPORTSCAST-
ERS AND SPORTSWRITERS ASSOCIA-
TION, Salisbury
AGRICULTURE EXPORT EXPANSION
WORKSHOP, Raleigh
DRIVER EDUCATION CONFERENCE, Ra-
leigh
518
Papers of Terry San ford
April 14 1964* SOUTHEASTERN CHILD CARE ASSOCI-
ATION, Asheville
April 15, 1964* "ALL-AMERICA CITY" CIVIC LUNCHEON,
Gastonia
April 16, 1964* MOCK POLITICAL PRESIDENTIAL ELEC-
TION, Chapel Hill
April 18, 1964 JEFFERSON-JACKSON DAY DINNER, Ra-
leigh
April 24, 1964 DEDICATION OF NATIONAL HEAD-
QUARTERS BUILDING OF AMERICAN
ASSOCIATION OF TEXTILE CHEMISTS
AND COLORISTS, Research Triangle Park
April 25, 1964* INAUGURATION OF DR. S. P. MASSIE,
JR., AS PRESIDENT OF NORTH CARO-
LINA COLLEGE, Durham
April 25, 1964* VIRGINIA'S NINTH CONGRESSIONAL
DISTRICT JEFFERSON-JACKSON DAY
DINNER, Abingdon, Virginia
April 26, 1964 FAYETTEVILLE STATE COLLEGE FOUND-
ERS DAY, Fayetteville
April 26, 1964* SOUTH ATLANTIC REGIONAL DRIVE-IN
CONFERENCE OF SCHOOL ADMINI-
STRATORS, Durham
April 27, 1964* BOARD OF CONSERVATION AND DE-
VELOPMENT DINNER, Wilson
April 28, 1964* AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR PUBLIC AD-
MINISTRATION, Raleigh
April 29, 1964* CONFERENCE ON COMMUNITY DEVEL-
OPMENT PROGRAMS, Washington, D.C.
April 30, 1964* EDUCATION RALLY, NEW LONDON ELE-
MENTARY SCHOOL, New London
April 30, 1964* EDUCATION RALLY, NORTH STANLY
HIGH SCHOOL, New London
April 30, 1964* EDUCATION RALLY, ALBEMARLE SEN-
IOR HIGH SCHOOL, Albemarle
April 30, 1964* EDUCATION RALLY, BADIN UNION
SCHOOL, Badin
April 30, 1964* STANLY COUNTY NCEA UNIT, Albemarle
May 1, 1964* NORTH CAROLINA RURAL SAFETY
COUNCIL, Raleigh
May 4, 1964* SOUTHERN CONFERENCE ON TEACHERS
RETIREMENT, Raleigh
List of Omitted Speeches
519
May II, 1964
May 14, 1964
May 21, 1964*
May 24, 1964*
May 29, 1964
June 2, 1964*
June 14, 1964
June 24, 1964
July 20, 1964*
August 11, 1964*
August II, 1964*
August 13, 1964*
August 30, 1964
September 1, 1964
September 14, 1964
September 17, 1964*
September 29, 1964
TWENTY-MILLIONTH VISITOR CERE-
MONY, JOHN H. KERR DAM AND RESER-
VOIR, Boydton, Virginia
PRESENTATION OF WORLD PEACE
AWARD OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIA-
TION TO PAUL G. HOFFMAN, MANAG-
ING DIRECTOR OF UNITED NATIONS
SPECIAL FUND, Chapel Hill
DEDICATION OF GUY PHILLIPS SCHOOL,
Chapel Hill
DEDICATION OF 4-H CLUB CENTER,
CHINQUA-PENN PLANTATION, Reidsville
NORTH CAROLINA STATE OF THE UNI-
VERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA COM-
MENCEMENT, Raleigh
COMMENCEMENT EXERCISES AT CHRIS-
TIAN COLLEGE, Columbia, Missouri
EAST CAROLINA COLLEGE COMMENCE-
MENT EXERCISES, Greenville
WAYNE COUNTY INDUSTRIAL COMMIT-
TEE OF 100, Goldsboro
CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT
BOARD MEETING, Morehead City
NORTH CAROLINA ASSOCIATION OF
COUNTY ACCOUNTANTS BREAKFAST,
Washington, D.C.
TWENTY-NINTH ANNUAL CONFERENCE
OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUN-
TIES, Washington, D.C.
EIGHTY-FOURTH ANNUAL MASONIC
PICNIC, Mocksville
DEDICATION OF WILSON MEMORIAL
HOSPITAL, Wilson
DEDICATION OF DILL DIVISION OF
EATON MANUFACTURING COMPANY,
Roxboro
NORTH CAROLINA CIVIL DEFENSE AS-
SOCIATION, Raleigh
DEMOCRATIC WOMEN'S CONVENTION,
Charlotte
DEDICATION OF COWANS FORD STA-
TION AND LAKE NORMAN, Cowans Ford
Dam, Charlotte
520
Papers of Terry Sanford
October 5, 1964
October 6, 1964*
October 8, 1964*
October 9, 1964*
October 12, 1964
October 17, 1964*
October 26, 1964*
October 26, 1964*
October 27, 1964*
October 27, 1964*
October 29, 1964*
November 4, 1964*
November 12, 1964*
November 17, 1964*
November 17, 1964*
November 30, 1964
December I, 1964*
December 2, 1964*
December 2, 1964*
December 2, 1964*
DEMOCRATIC RALLY, Parkersburg, West
Virginia
INTRODUCTION OF PRESIDENT LYN-
DON B. JOHNSON AT DEMOCRATIC
RALLY, Raleigh
DEMOCRATIC RALLY, Hopkinsville, Ken-
tucky
DEMOCRATIC RALLY, Louisville, Kentucky
REPORT FOR THE COMMITTEE ON IN-
DUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT, SOUTHERN
GOVERNORS CONFERENCE, San Antonio,
Texas
BLOUNT COUNTY DEMOCRATIC RALLY,
Maryville, Tennessee
DEMOCRATIC RALLY, Columbia, Kentucky
DEMOCRATIC RALLY, Morganfield, Ken-
tucky
FAMILY LIFE COUNCIL LUNCHEON, Dur-
ham
STUDENTS FOR JOHNSON-HUMPHREY
RALLY, DUKE UNIVERSITY, Durham
FORSYTH COUNTY DEMOCRATIC
RALLY, Winston-Salem
PHI DELTA KAPPA BANQUET, Chapel Hill
TRENTON ROTARY CLUB, Trenton, New
Jersey
PRODIGAL SONS OF NORTH CAROLINA
LUNCHEON, New York City
COUNCIL OF CHIEF STATE SCHOOL
OFFICERS, New York City
DEDICATION OF AEROGLIDE CORPOR-
ATION PLANT, Raleigh
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE TRAFFIC
AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE
LUNCHEON, Winston-Salem
EDUCATION RALLY, ROBERSONVILLE
HIGH SCHOOL, Robersonville
EDUCATION RALLY, WILLIAMSTON
HIGH SCHOOL, Williamston
EDUCATION RALLY, SOUTHWESTERN
HIGH SCHOOL, Windsor
List of Omitted Speeches
521
December 2, 1964*
December 2, 1964*
December 2, 1964*
December 5, 1964*
December 8, 1964*
December 9, 1964*
December 11, 1964
January 5, 1965*
January 6, 1965*
January 7, 1965*
EDUCATION RALLY, BERTIE COUNTY
HIGH SCHOOL, Windsor
EDUCATION RALLY, NORTHAMPTON
HIGH SCHOOL, Conway
REMARKS AT PRESENTATION OF ECO-
NOMIC STUDY OF NORTHAMPTON
COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL, Conway
DEDICATION OF SCHIEFFELIN &: COM-
PANY PLANT, Apex
YOUNG DEMOCRATIC CLUB, Chapel Hill
DUKE UNIVERSITY LAW SCHOOL, Dur-
ham
TEXTURED FIBRES, INCORPORATED,
OPEN HOUSE, Liberty
GOOD NEIGHBOR COUNCIL, Winston-
Salem
EDUCATION RALLY, FRANKLIN HIGH
SCHOOL, Franklin
EDUCATION RALLIES IN CUMBERLAND,
HOKE, LEE, AND HARNETT COUNTIES
PROCLAMATIONS
i
1
DISASTER AREA
Executive Department
Raleigh
A Proclamation by the Governor
March 8, 1962
[This was the first of several state of emergency proclamations issued dur-
ing the Sanford administration as a result of severe storms, or as was the
case in October, 1963, a severe drought. In this instance. President Kennedy
responded favorably, on March 16, to the state's request for federal aid to
recover from the coastal disaster.]
Whereas, On Wednesday, March 7, 1962, a devastating storm
struck the coastal counties of Dare, Currituck, and Hyde, causing
great damage and destruction resulting in major disaster con-
ditions;
And Whereas, Ocean tides three to four feet above normal
high tides and extremely high winds caused great damage to
homes, streets, highways, public utilities, and facilities;
And Whereas, State and local agencies, including the Civil
Defense organizations, have been actively engaged in rendering
assistance and all available state and local governmental funds
are, or will be, committed to this purpose;
And Whereas, Serious damages were suffered as a result of this
storm involving a primary federal aid highway along the Outer
Banks, with the result that emergency relief funds are badly
needed for repair of said highway under the provisions of Sec-
tion 13-A U.S. Code annotated;
Now, Therefore, I, Terry Sanford, Governor of North Caro-
lina, do hereby declare a state of emergency to exist in the coun-
ties of Dare, Currituck, and Hyde, as a result of this storm, in
witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the
Great Seal of the State of North Carolina to be affixed.
Done at the City of Raleigh this eighth
(Seal) day of March in the year of our Lord,
nineteen hundred and sixty-two.
. Terry Sanford, Governor.
By the Governor:
Graham Jones, Press Secretary to the Governor.
526
Papers of Terry Sanford
THANKSGIVING DAY
Executive Department
Raleigh
A Proclamation by the Governor
November 22, 1962
Whereas, Americans, blessed by a generous Creator, have set
aside a day of Thanksgiving since the early days of this nation to
return thanks to God and to share our blessings in a feast of
brotherhood;
And Whereas, North Carolinians from Nags Head to Nanta-
hala, like our fellow Americans from the Atlantic to the Pacific,
have much for which to be grateful in this year of 1962;
And Whereas, Since the last Thanksgiving, the freedoms of
man, gained over the period of thousands of years, and indeed,
the very existence of man, have been gravely threatened and
greatly defended, it is especially timely to render thanks to our
Creator;
And Whereas, North Carolinians have reaped bountiful har-
vests in 1962 from their farmlands, their factories, and their
schools to the end that we can face the winter with confidence;
And Whereas, North Carolinians and all Americans can dem-
onstrate the true spirit of Thanksgiving by sharing our surplus
of prosperity with less fortunate neighbors through our Thanks-
giving offerings:
Now, Therefore, I, Terry Sanford, Governor of North Caro-
lina, do hereby proclaim Thursday, November 22, 1962, a legal
holiday in North Carolina and request that all North Carolinians
observe this day as one of Thanksgiving to the God who has been
so generous to us.
In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and
caused the Great Seal of the State of North Carolina to
(Seal) be affixed. Done at the City of Raleigh, this the twenty-
first day of November in the year of our Lord nine-
teen hundred and sixty-two.
Terry Sanford, Governor.
By the Governor:
Graham Jones, Press Secretary.
Proclamations
527
SPECIAL SESSION OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY
Executive Department
Raleigh
A Proclamation by the Governor
October 10, 1963
Whereas, The General Assembly of 1963, by Resolution No.
90, requested the Governor of North Carolina "at his discretion,
to call an Extra Session of the General Assembly of North Caro-
lina, reciting as the reason therefor that the General Assembly
of North Carolina has been unable to agree on the provisions of
an Act to redistrict the State Senate, as required by the Constitu-
tion of North Carolina."
Now^ therefore, I, Terry Sanford, Governor of the State of
North Carolina, do, by and with the advice of the Council of
State, proclaim that the General Assembly of the State of North
Carolina shall meet in Extraordinary Session at Raleigh, North
Carolina, at Noon, on Monday, October 14, 1963, for the purpose
of considering and enacting legislation to redistrict the State Sen-
ate, as required by the Constitution of North Carolina. I do
hereby call upon, notify, and direct all members of the said
General Assembly to meet at the Legislative Building in the City
of Raleigh at Noon, on Monday, October 14, 1963, in such Gen-
eral Assembly as provided by the Constitution.
In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and
caused the Great Seal of the State of North Carolina
(Seal) to be affixed. Done at the City of Raleigh, this the
tenth day of October, in the Year of our Lord one
thousand nine hundred and sixty-three.
Terry Sanford, Governor.
By the Governor:
Graham Jones, Press Secretary.
528
Papers of Terry Sanford
PRESIDENTIAL ELECTORS
Executive Department
Raleigh
A Proclamation by the Governor
December 9, 1964
Whereas, The State Board of Elections of the State of North
Carolina has canvassed the returns of the votes cast for electors
for President and Vice-President of the United States at the Gen-
eral Elections held on November 3, 1964;
And whereas. Said State Board of Elections has prepared and
certified an abstract of same to the Secretary of State of the State
of North Carolina;
And whereas. Said Secretary of State has, under his hand and
the seal of his office, certified to the undersigned Governor of
the State of North Carolina the names of as many persons re-
ceiving the highest number of votes for electors of President and
Vice-President of the United States as the State of North Carolina
is entitled to in the Electoral College:
Now, THEREFORE, I, Terry Sanford, Governor of the State of
North Carolina, pursuant to the power and authority vested in
me by the provisions contained in the General Statutes of North
Carolina, Section 163-110, do hereby proclaim that the following
persons have been duly elected as electors for President and Vice-
President of the United States:
Electors at Large
Robert E. Williams
Angus McKellar
Elector
C. Don Langston
Congressional District
First
Second
Third
Fourth
Fifth
Sixth
Seventh
Eighth
Ninth
Tenth
Dr. Badie T. Clark
Dr. John D. Robinson, Jr.
Brantley Poole
Allen H. Gwynn, Jr.
Carl T. Durham
Sam C. Morris
C. C. Randall
Mrs. Stella Anderson
Mrs. Lester Gilford
E. L. Loftin
Eleventh
and each of the electors above named is hereby enjoined to at-
tend a meeting at the Capitol in the City of Raleigh, North
Proclamations
529
Carolina, at noon, on the fourteenth day of December, 1964, for
the purpose of voting for the President and Vice-President of the
United States, as required by law.
Done at our Capital City of Raleigh, this ninth day of
(Seal) December, in the year of our Lord one thousand nine
hundred and sixty-four, and in the one hundred and
eighty-ninth year of our American Independence.
Terry Sanford, Governor.
By the Governor:
Graham E. Jones, Press Secretary.
INAUGURATION OF DAN K. MOORE
Executive Department
Raleigh
A Proclamation by the Governor
January 7, 1965
Whereas, The Constitution of North Carolina provides that
the supreme executive power of the State shall be vested in a
Governor and stipulates that his term of office shall be for four
years, commencing on the first of January next after his election
by the qualified electors of the State and shall continue until his
successor is elected and qualified;
And whereas. In the general election of November 3, 1964,
the Honorable Dan K. Moore was elected Governor at the same
time that other constitutional state officers were chosen, and the
results of this election have been certified by legally prescribed
authority;
And whereas. The Honorable Dan K. Moore and other elected
constitutional officers will take their oaths of office in a ceremony
beginning at noon on January 8, 1965;
And whereas. The Constitution has been amended to defer
the beginning of the biennial session of the General Assembly
from January to February, thus preventing the General Assem-
bly from performing customary functions in connection with
the inauguration of the Governor and other constitutional state
officers:
Now therefore, I, Terry Sanford, Governor of the State of
530
Papers of Terry Sanford
North Carolina, do hereby proclaim Thursday and Friday, Jan-
uary 7 and 8, 1965, as the period for the festivities and cere-
monies pertaining to the inauguration arranged by the Gover-
nor's Inaugural Committee.
Done at our capital city of Raleigh, this seventh
day of January, in the year of our Lord one thou-
(Seal) sand nine hundred and sixty-five, and in the one
hundred and eighty-ninth year of our American
Independence.
By the Governor:
Graham Jones, Press Secretary.
Terry Sanford, Governor.
EXECUTIVE ORDERS
ESTABLISHING THE GOVERNOR'S COMMISSION
ON EDUCATIONAL TELEVISION
May 15, 1962
Whereas^ The General Assembly established in 1953 the State
Educational Radio and Television Commission for the purpose
of making recommendations concerning the uses proposed for
television facilities for educational and cultural purposes with
particular reference to the development, financing, operation,
and management of television facilities for educational and cul-
tural purposes; and
Whereas^ This Commission, in accordance with Chapter 1204
of the 1953 Session Laws, completed its work and reported its
findings to the Governor, thereby in the opinion of the Attorney
General, terminating its existence; and
Whereas, As a result of the work of the Commission, and with
the generous assistance of a number of individuals and corpora-
tions, the University of North Carolina established WUNC-TV
on Channel 4; and
Whereas, There is today a pressing need to expand the ser-
vice of educational and cultural television throughout the entire
State; and
Whereas, Recent legislation in the United States Congress
provides for the granting of federal funds for educational and
cultural television equipment; and
Whereas, In view of the growing importance of television as
an educational medium, it is imperative that North Carolina
take advantage of this legislation in the most efficient and fruit-
ful fashion:
There is hereby established the Governor's Commission on
Educational Television.
Composition:
The Commission shall be composed of so many members as
the Governor sees fit to appoint, with balanced representation of
professional and educational interests as well as geographical
distribution. Persons shall be appointed to membership by the
Governor for terms of two years.
Duties:
It shall be the duty of this Commission to consider all requests
originating in North Carolina for federal grants to be used for
educational and cultural television purposes within this State,
and to advise the Governor as to which proposals should receive
534
Papers of Terry Sanford
the official support of the State, and in what order of priority.
The Commission is also charged with the responsibility of ad-
vising the Governor as to the most efficient, fruitful, and expe-
ditious way in which the benefits of educational television can
be provided to all the people of North Carolina. It shall be the
duty of the Commission to report to the Governor on October
1, 1962, and every six months thereafter.
Meetings:
Meetings of the Commission shall be held at the call of the
person designated by the Governor as Chairman of the Com-
mission.
Done in Raleigh, North Carolina, this the fifteenth day of
May, nineteen hundred and sixty-two.
Terry Sanford, Governor.
ESTABLISHING THE NORTH CAROLINA OUTER
BANKS SEASHORE PARK COMMISSION
August 3, 1962
Whereas^ There is an urgent need to preserve the outer banks
of North Carolina from the forces of nature threatening their
destruction and endangering inland waters and land areas of
the State; and
Whereas, There is increasing need for more public recrea-
tional areas which afford all of the advantages of water sports
and fishing; and
Whereas, That reach of the North Carolina ocean shore line
known as the outer banks contains a large part of the remaining
undeveloped and unspoiled areas available for development in
the interests of all the people; and
Whereas, It has become increasingly clear that concerted ac-
tion is necessary in order to plan carefully for the conservation
and development of this area;
There is hereby established the North Carolina Outer Banks
Seashore Park Commission.
Composition:
The Commission shall be composed of so many members as
the Governor sees fit to appoint. Persons so appointed shall serve
for terms of two years. The following persons shall serve on this
Executive Orders
535
Commission by virtue of the offices which they occupy: The
Chairman of the Board of Water Resources; the Director of the
Property Control Division of the Department of Administration;
the Chairman of Parks Committee of the Board of Conservation
and Development; the Director of Civil Defense of the State
of North Carolina; the Director of the North Carolina Recrea-
tion Commission; the Chairman of the North Carolina State
Highway Commission or his nominee.
Duties:
It shall be the duty of this Commission to examine the North
Carolina outer banks from Shackleford Banks to the Virginia
state line, and to plan and assist in the preservation of the shore
line and the establishment of public parks in that area. It will
be the responsibility of this Commission to decide how the outer
banks can best be protected and how the coastal areas can best
be preserved from great damage. The Commission is also charged
with the responsibility of planning for the soundest development
of the outer banks area, keeping in mind the advancement of
tourism, business, and industry as well as necessary conservation
practices. The Commission is specifically charged with the duty
of developing a comprehensive plan of co-operation among re-
lated state and federal agencies in order to carry out its respon-
sibilities as assigned herein. Once this plan has been devised,
this Commission shall be that State agency charged with co-
ordinating the implementation of the comprehensive plan. It
shall be the duty of the Commission to report to the Governor
so often as seems desirable to the Commission, but at least every
six months.
Organization:
The Governor will designate a chairman, a vice-chairman, a
secretary, and an executive committee. The North Carolina
Outer Banks Seashore Park Commission shall be furnished office
space and staff assistance by the Department of Water Resources.
Meetings:
Meetings of the Commission shall be held at the call of the
Chairman of the Commission.
Done in Raleigh, North Carolina, this the third -day of August,
nineteen hundred and sixty-two.
Terry Sanford, Governor.
536
Papers of Terry Sanford
ESTABLISHING THE GOVERNOR'S COMMISSION
ON THE STATUS OF WOMEN
October 11, 1963
Whereas^ The women of this State have served with distinc-
tion in their roles as homemakers, participants in cultural and
civic affairs, and working contributors to governmental and eco-
nomic progress; and
Whereas^ The full realization of the rights and potentials of
women is of vital importance to the advancement of our State;
and
Whereas, Measures that contribute to strengthening family
security and home life will advance the general welfare; and
Whereas, Measures that strengthen full and effective partici-
pation in cultural and civic affairs are important to continuing
progress in our State; and
Whereas, It is in the interest of our State to promote the
economy and security of our people through the most efficient
and effective utilization of the skills of all persons; and
Whereas, Women should have the opportunity to develop in
their varied capacities and fulfill their aspirations on the basis
of individual merit; and
Whereas, A Commission should be charged with the respon-
sibility for developing recommendations to overcome discrim-
ination in employment and other outmoded limitations based on
sex, and to provide services to enable women to continue in
their family role while making maximum contributions to the
world around them:
Now, THEREFORE, By virtuc of the authority vested in me as
Governor of the State of North Carolina by the State Constitu-
tion and Statutes, it is ordered as follows:
Part I
Establishment of the Governor's Commission
ON THE Status of Women
Sec. 101. There is hereby established the Governor's Commis-
sion on the Status of Women, referred to herein as the "Com-
mission." The Commission shall terminate not later than January
1, 1965.
Sec. 102. The Commission shall be composed of twenty mem-
bers appointed by the Governor from among persons with a
Executive Orders
537
competency in the area of women's activities and public affairs,
and from among such officials of state agencies as are considered
necessary to carry out the work of the Commission. The Gover-
nor shall designate a Chairman, Vice-Chairman, and Executive
Vice-Chairman from among the membership.
Sec. 103. The Commission shall meet at the call of the Chair-
man.
Sec. 104. Necessary facilitating assistance, including the pro-
vision of suitable office space, shall be furnished the Commission
by appropriate state agencies designated by the Department of
Administration. An Executive Secretary shall be detailed by the
Governor to serve the Commission.
Sec. 105. The Commission is authorized to use the services
of consultants and experts as may be found necessary and as may
be otherwise authorized by law.
Sec. 106. All executive departments and agencies of the State
are directed to co-operate with the Commission in the perform-
ance of its duties.
Part II '
Duties of the Governor's Commission -
ON THE Status of Women
Sec. 201. The Commission shall review the progress, consider
the potential, and make recommendations as needed for con-
structive action on problems in the following areas:
(a) The employment policies and practices of the State of
North Carolina, with reference to additional affirmative steps
which should be taken through legislation, executive or admin-
istrative action to assure nondiscrimination on the basis of sex
and to enhance constructive employment opportunities for wom-
en.
(b) Employment policies and practices, including those on
wages, under State contracts.
(c) State Labor laws dealing with such matters as wages,
hours and working conditions, to determine wliether they aie
accomplishing the purposes for which they were enacted and
whether they should be adapted to changing technological, eco-
nomic, and social conditions.
(d) DiflFerences in legal treatment of men and women in re-
gard to legal and property rights, and family relations. P
(e) Policies and practices with respect to education, including
counseling.
538
Papers of Terry Sanford
(£) Policies and practices with respect to vocational training
and retraining.
(g) Health and welfare programs as they affect women in the
performance of their varied capacities.
(h) The general welfare of disadvantaged groups.
(i) New and expanded services that may be required for
women as wives, mothers, volunteers, and workers, including
home services and arrangements for care of children during the
working day.
Sec. 202. The Commission shall submit a final report of its
recommendations to the Governor by January I, 1965.
Done in Raleigh, North Carolina, this eleventh day of Octo-
ber in the year of our Lord one thousand nine hundred and
sixty-three.
Terry Sanford, Governor.
ESTABLISHING THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE
ARTS COUNCIL
December 3, 1964
1. There is hereby created "The North Carolina State Arts
Council."
2. The purpose of said Council shall be to advance the inter-
ests of the arts, to survey the status and the needs of the Arts of
North Carolina, to develop the influence of art in education, to
encourage professional training and standards in the performing
and fine arts in North Carolina, and to represent the State of
North Carolina in matters relating to the provisions of the Na-
tional Arts and Cultural Development Act of 1964, and in na-
tional and regional meetings and conferences of similar councils.
3. The Council shall consist of twenty (20) members, ap-
pointed by the Governor of North Carolina for a term which
shall expire on September 1, 1966, unless the existence of the
Council is sooner terminated as herein provided.
4. No member shall receive from the State compensation or
reimbursements for expenses, and no State funds shall be ex-
pended or obligated by the Council or in behalf of the Council.
5. The Council shall report recommendations to the Gov-
ernor of North Carolina on or before July I, 1966, relating to
the permanent organization of a North Carolina Arts Council
Executive Orders
539
and other matters deemed appropriate by the Council; and this
Council shall cease to exist when a permanent Council is estab-
lished, or in any event no later than September 1, 1966, unless
its existence is reserved by the Governor of North Carolina.
6. The Council may accept gifts, and may expend any funds
received in any way that the Council shall determine so as to
accomplish the objects of the Council.
Done at Raleigh, North Carolina, this 3rd day of December,
1964.
Terry Sanford, Governor.
ll
STATEMENTS AND ARTICLES
STATEMENTS AND ARTICLES
[Literally hundreds of statements, press releases, public announcements,
and articles were issued from the Governor's Office during the Sanford
administration. It is obvious that only a limited few could be included in
this volume. Over forty short articles in a series entitled "Be Proud of
North Carolina," special articles for newspapers and magazines, and trans-
scripts of press conferences would all add interest to a volume of Sanford
material, but space limitations prohibit the use of most of this material.
Statements on various subjects would fill a book in themselves. Selection
was made on the basis of significance in most instances, though some state-
ments were included as being representative of a larger number on the same
or related topics. In many instances the statements relate closely to addresses
made by the Governor and should be read in connection with the speeches
for complete clarity and meaning. Where addresses adequately cover the
subject, statements have been omitted. Subjects such as the tobacco health
scare, civil rights and race relations, the Job Corps, and retarded children
are examples in this category. Many, many special "days," 'weeks," and
"months" are observed in North Carolina and elsewhere; statements on such
subjects as "Gasoline Retailers Day," "Beauty Career Days in North Caro-
lina," "Corn Bread Week," "Apple Week," "Sweet Potato Week," "Women
in Construction Week," "Play Tennis Week," "North Carolina Beauty Salon
Week," "PBX Operators Week in North Carolina," "Music Month," and
"American History Month" are examples picked at random from the
numerous omitted statements.]
DESIGNATING NORTH CAROLINA'S OPENING
OF THE CIVIL WAR COMMEMORATION
January 6, 1961
The President of the United States, acting on the request con-
tained in a joint resolution of the Congress, has proclaimed
Sunday, January 8, 1961, as the official opening of the one hun-
dredth anniversary of the Civil War.
North Carolinians were 'Tirst at Bethel, Farthest at Gettys-
burg, and Last at Appomattox." North Carolinians also were
among the first to strive to bind up the wounds of the nation
and to defend the nation in subsequent wars.
It is therefore fitting that North Carolina should join in prayer
with her sister states— North, South, East and West— in opening
the Civil War Centennial observance.
In recognition of this, I am happy to designate Sunday, Janu-
ary 8, 1961, as the official opening of
North Carolina's Commemoration of the Civil War
and call upon all citizens of our state to join with citizens of all
of the other United States in observing Sunday, January 8, 1961,
as a day of prayer.
544
Papers of Terry Sanford
DESIGNATING BROTHERHOOD WEEK
February 6, 1961
The annual celebration of Brotherhood Week, to be held
February 19-26, 1961, is sponsored by the National Conference
of Christians and Jews.
The National Conference of Christians and Jews is diligently
working to establish a social order in which the religious ideals
of brotherhood and justice shall become the standards of human
relationship.
The purpose of Brotherhood Week is to symbolize renewed
dedication to the ideals of greater tolerance, understanding,
friendship, and co-operation among all our citizens, and greater
respect for the difference and beliefs of our people.
Our strength as one nation under God depends on our unity
and informed vigilance as a free people.
Brotherhood Week is in the tradition established by our fore-
fathers and enunciated in the Declaration of Independence and
the Constitution and deserves the wholehearted co-operation of
all the people of our state.
Therefore, I am happy to proclaim the week of February 19-
26, 1961, as
Brotherhood Week
in North Carolina, and urge the people of this state to observe
this week with full awareness of their responsibility to increase
that spirit of brotherhood so essential to the progress of our state
and our nation. '
REGARDING STATE PERSONNEL
April 12, 1961
I think the state employees are generally doing an outstanding
job. I have not been surprised but I have been pleased to find
that they are conscientious and are earning their pay. I am happy
to be associated with them.
Two bills are being prepared and will be introduced shortly
on subjects dealing with state employees.
First, a bill is being prepared to provide for longevity pay.
This will be enabling legislation that will permit the Governor
and Personnel Council to set up a system for state employees to
Statements and Articles
545
receive an additional increment based on length of meritorious
service when they can no longer receive ordinary merit incre-
ments.
Second, legislation is being prepared to increase the size of
the State Personnel Council from five to seven members with at
least two members on the council to come from the ranks of
state employees.
I am quite aware of the financial needs of all state employees.
It is my hope that more money will be available to take care of
those needs. At the present time the joint finance committees
are working on numerous revenue bills, and we are giving care-
ful consideration to additional financial compensation for state
employees in addition to the recommendation of the Advisory
Budget Commission. '
CONCERNING ECONOMIC LEGISLATION
April 24, 1961
Make no mistake where this administration stands. I chose my
company with the man who stood with the "branch head boys."
I still covet their confidence. But I want to make it clear that
my whole purpose, town and country, is to serve the people who
in this rich time still seem lost on dead-end streets.
I have talked much about schools. I mean to go on stressing
education— quality education for our children. But that is not
all. Quality education is only the best, the essential, the shining
example of the full opportunity North Carolinians must have.
And in terms of opportunity we do not deal merely with chil-
dren. Indeed, regardless of the quality of the schools we provide,
our children may be denied the best chance if the opportunities
of their parents here and now are stifled.
There are three legislative proposals which will help open up
the dead-end streets.
First, I favor a fair and adequate minimum wage. We haven't
gone as far as we can, but it seems to me the least we can do right
now is to adopt Representative Kennedy's bill expanding cover-
age.
Two years ago when North Carolina first and in limited fash-
ion adopted a minimum wage law, we heard dire predictions
from the lobbyists that a state which paid its poorest people a
minimum wage would bankrupt businesses. The truth is that
there has not been a single failure honestly due to minimum
546
Papers of Terry San ford
wages we have paid in the past two years. The least we can do
is to extend it to thousands of others whose pitiful wages help
keep all North Carolina poor.
Second, the poorest must find credit when they are pressed for
funds without mortgaging their hopes and lives to money lend-
ers, loan sharks, and usurers. I don't want to see us become so
involved in the fight between "big" small lenders and "little"
small lenders that we forget our purpose is to protect the least
of our people who are in no position to protect themselves.
The present expansion of this business, like flies around a
honey pot, indicates that there is still a profit in oppression. And
there has been oppression of the poor in the small loan business
in North Carolina. It should be our business to stop it in terms
of both good business and good heart.
Third, I endorse without reservation the bills to improve
sanitation requirements of migrant labor camps and to require
safeguards on motor vehicles used in transporting migrant work-
ers.
This group of people constitutes the most hopeless and help-
less element of wealthy America. The ultimate answer perhaps
lies in a greater development of mechanical harvesting equip-
ment and an expanding economy making it possible for these
migrant workers to find employment not requiring nomadic ex-
istence. But for the present, we should do everything possible to
lessen the misery, the health hazards, the dangers to which we
have too long closed our eyes.
North Carolina cannot afford to continue its dead-end streets.
ANNOUNCING THE NORTH CAROLINA
INTERNATIONAL TRADE FAIR
April 27, 1961
This autumn the state of North Carolina will hold the first
state-sponsored International Trade Fair for the purpose of show-
ing people from all over the world North Carolina's manufac-
tured goods and the international trade potential of our state.
The International Trade Fair in North Carolina will offer
management, salesmen, and buyers the unique opportunity of
seeing the products of thousands of North Carolina manufac-
turers, ranging from textiles and tobacco to furniture and elec-
tronics.
We are inviting industrial, commercial, and governmental
Statements and Articles
547
leaders from Europe, Latin America, and the Orient to come to
North Carolina on this occasion. We expect this to be a fair
where sales are made and orders taken for quality North Caro-
lina goods which will be on exhibit.
The International Trade Fair in North Carolina, and the
resulting increase in international trade which we firmly expect
from the fair, will have beneficial effects on North Carolina's
production and trade.
While minor in itself, we believe it will be an important step
in the right direction for the solution of the problem on the gold
imbalance. We trust this fair will set a pattern for selling Amer-
ican goods and spreading American good will abroad.
In view of the importance of this fair to the United States,
generally, and to North Carolina, in particular, I have asked
President Kennedy to give it his attention, his interest, and his
assistance. The United States Department of Commerce is co-
operating in many ways.
North Carolina has accepted the President's challenge: We are
not asking what the federal government can do for us. Rather,
we are, with this International Trade Fair in North Carolina,
seeing what we can do for the United States through the ex-
change of trade, ideas, and good will.
The North Carolina International Trade Fair is to open Octo-
ber 12. We are hoping President Kennedy will come to North
Carolina to help us open it. That is Columbus Day and we are
inviting our friends overseas to rediscover America and North
Carolina.
COMMENDING THE NORTH CAROLINA SENATE
ON PASSAGE OF THE REVENUE ACT
June 8, 1961
I admire and appreciate the courage and the vision so clearly
demonstrated by the members of the Senate this afternoon.
548
Papers of Terry Sanford
APPLAUDING THE PASSAGE OF THE
APPROPRIATIONS ACT BY THE
STATE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
June 8, 1961
This was excellent! Such overwhelming support of quality
education and the other programs for advancing North Carolina
is a credit to the leadership and membership of the House. I
thank them.
ON THE SETTLEMENT OF THE MARS HILL SCHOOL
CONTROVERSY
June 13, 1961
[A long-standing case of political rivalry in Madison County mushroomed
into a dramatic controversy in the spring of 1961 when the school board
failed to re-elect Ralph Neill as principal of Mars Hill School. Faculty and
parents protested, alleging that politics and education were mixed by the
action. Concern of state officials increased when students staged an eight-
day boycott of classes. After a series of futile conferences among leaders and
an attempt by State Superintendent of Public Instruction Charles Carroll
to settle the argument, Governor Sanford intervened. This statement marked
the formal settlement of the controversy, an arbitrary solution which both
groups agreed in advance to accept.]
On May 21, I agreed to serve as arbitrator in the dispute then
existing between the Madison County School Board and patrons
and faculty members at Mars Hill School. While it was an un-
usual step to ''borrow trouble" in this manner, I consider it
justified because it appeared to be the only means possible at
that time of ending a student boycott at the school. The boycott
was ended that day and almost all the students who had been
absent from the school for more than a week returned to class.
The school time lost has been made up.
As their part of this agreement, parties involved in the dispute
—the Madison County Board of Education, the Mars Hill School
District Committee, representatives of the faculty and of the
Citizens Committee— agreed and bound themselves in all good
faith to accept the solution which I, as Governor of North Caro-
lina, should present. They further agreed to co-operate with each
other in all good faith to the end that such solution should have
a reasonable opportunity for resolving the dispute. Subsequently,
Statements and Articles
549
my assistant, Hugh Cannon/^^ went to Madison County and re-
duced this understanding to writing.
On June 2, I directed Tom Lambeth/^* my administrative as-
sistant, to go to Madison County for the purpose of investigating
the situation and reporting back to me the facts surrounding the
dispute. Earlier I had discussed the dispute with representatives
of the various parties involved.
On June 2 and 3, my administrative assistant was in Madison
County. In meetings which lasted for more than thirteen hours,
he met with approximately 600 citizens of the county. He talked
individually with sixteen members of the faculty, most of the
members of the Madison County Board of Education, the county
superintendent, the principal of the Mars Hill School, students,
and parents. In group meetings, he met with fourteen other
members of the faculty, members of the Mars Hill School Dis-
trict Committee, and the Mars Hill Citizens Committee. He con-
ducted a public hearing, attended by approximately 500 citizens
of the county.
On the basis of information gathered in the talks which I have
held with the parties involved and on the basis of the investiga-
tion, I have arrived at several conclusions which I feel should
be cited as the basis for my recommendations.
1. The action of the Madison County Board of Education in
not re-electing Ralph Neill as principal of Mars Hill School
was action legally taken by a properly constituted board with
full authority to make decisions in such matters.
2. I would also point out that Mr. Neill had failed to receive
the recommendation of the superintendent of schools for re-
election in 1960, but he had been continued as principal by
action of the board, overruling the action of the superintend-
ent. Friction has been evident for several years, but friction
is difficult to define and no good purpose would be served
by attempting to document the many differences of the past.
3. There is no evidence of recent coercion being exerted on
members of the school faculty to obtain political contribu-
tions. Teachers were specifically questioned as to this point.
With one exception, they indicated that any such contribu-
tions, at least in recent years, had been made voluntarily.
Finally, on this point, I have carefully investigated the inci-
Hugh Cannon (1931- ), lawyer from Raleigh; Rhodes Scholar, 1955;
member of staff of Institute of Government, 1956; gubernatorial assistant, 1961;
Director of Administration, 1961. North Carolina Manual, 1963, 459.
Thomas Willis Lambeth (1935- ), member of news staff of Winston-
Salem Journal, 1959-1960; administrative assistant to Governor Sanford, 1961.
North Carolina Manual, 1963, 457.
550
Papers of Terry Sanford
dent cited in the press (when Mr. Neill was reported to have
refused to allow solicitation of campaign contributions dur-
ing school hours) and find that such a request was made.
This was in 1958. Mr. Neill properly refused permission for
solicitation at the school. I must add that his action was en-
dorsed at that time not only by the County Board of Educa-
tion but also by the executive committee of the majority
party. Mr. Neill reports that there have been no attempts
since that time to make such solicitations. I have concluded
that this incident had nothing to do with the failure of the
board to re-elect Mr. Neill.
4. While the Madison County Board of Education has absolute
authority to make such decisions, reasons given for failure to
re-elect Mr. Neill are nebulous and seem insufficient in light
of the overwhelming support of his administration by patrons
of the school. It also seems significant to me that his re-
election this year was recommended by the superintendent of
Madison County schools.
5. I find almost unanimous agreement on the point of all parties
involved in this dispute that both Mr. Neill and Mr. Ander-
son are capable and dedicated school administrators.
6. Mr. Neill has the support and respect of almost all members
of the Mars Hill School faculty. I would point out that even
members of the faculty who failed to sign the statement op-
posing the board's action in Mr. Neill's case register no
criticism.
7. I find that Mr. Neill and members of the faculty must share
a great deal of the responsibility for the student boycott
which interrupted normal activity at the Mars Hill School
for a period of eight days. The boycott did nothing to relieve
the tension surrounding the dispute and was an expensive
and unfortunate incident in this affair. While there is no
evidence that Mr. Neill encouraged the boycott, it is obvious
that he made it possible through his refusal to demand that
students return to the school. One of the student leaders of
the boycott clearly demonstrated Mr. Neill's lack of positive
action when he publicly stated, "When Mr. Neill says jump,
we jump. We would have walked back in the school the min-
ute he said come." The actions of certain members of the
faculty are also to be criticized both before and during the
boycott. Teachers left classrooms unattended to hold meet-
ings in which their protests could be discussed and strategy
determined. There seems little doubt that some teachers ac-
tively encouraged students to participate in the boycott.
Statements and Articles
551
School bus drivers in some cases told students not to board
buses during the boycott; and, in at least one incident, forci-
bly removed students from buses.
8. I find that members of the Mars Hill School faculty expressed
great concern as to the security of their jobs. While most of
them have been teaching for a number of years at the school,
they indicate that they have done so most of the time uncer-
tain about their tenure. For a number of years, the practice
existed of not notifying teachers of their re-election for an
unusual length of time. This, however, has not been true in
recent years. Last year, teachers were notified before the end
of the current school year and this year would have been noti-
fied at such a time had not the boycott interrupted the nor-
mal operation of the school.
9. As a matter of policy, the state cannot condone student "walk-
outs" as a solution to any difficulty. Staying out of school is
a violation of law.
CONCLUSIONS
After carefully considering all of the factors involved, includ-
ing the necessity for maintaining respect for properly constituted
authority, the obviously overwhelming sentiment of the school
patrons, and, finally but primarily, the best interests of the chil-
dren at Mars Hill School, I recommend the following:
1. That Mr. Neill be re-elected for the coming school year.
2. That those protesting action of the County Board of Educa-
tion confine their protests in the future to the appellate ma-
chinery provided by law. They will be given an opportunity
later this year to express their opinions to a commission set
up by the General Assembly, at my request, to study carefully
the many and varied ways of school board selection and to
make appropriate recommendations. This is the proper, law-
ful method of effecting the will of the majority.
3. That the children be advised by the principal, the teachers,
and the parents that force is not a proper method of relief,
and while legal process may be slower, it is nevertheless the
method adopted by those nations believing in the principle
of the rule of law.
552
Papers of Terry Sanford
ON EXECUTIVE CLEMENCY
July 4, 1961
[In the spring of 1959, a textile strike at the Harriet-Henderson Cotton
Mills in Henderson grew to violent proportions with the dynamiting of a
power plant which served the mill. Several labor leaders, including Boyd
Payton, Carolinas Director of the Textile Workers Union of America, were
later convicted of participating in the conspiracy and were sentenced to four
to ten years. A fifteen-month legal battle to avoid prison sentences proved
futile as did an appeal to Governor Hodges for executive clemency. The
defendants began their prison terms in November, 1960. The Boyd Payton
case continued to receive much publicity, and Governor Sanford's July 4
statement expressed his views on executive clemency and revealed his
decision to reduce sentences in a number of cases. Three and one-half years
later Payton was granted a full pardon by the Governor. See page 638.]
The courts of our state and nation exercise in the name of
the people the powers of administration of justice. The Execu-
tive is charged with the exercise in the name of the people of
an equally important attitude of a healthy society— that of mercy
beyond the strict framework of the law.
The use of executive clemency is not a criticism of the courts,
either express or implied. I have no criticism of any court or
any judge. Executive clemency does not involve the changing of
any judicial determination. It does not eliminate punishment;
it does consider rehabilitation.
To decide when and where such mercy should be extended is
a decision which must be made by the Executive. It cannot be
delegated even in part to anyone else, and thus the decision is
a lonely one.
It falls to the Governor to blend mercy with justice, as best he
can, involving human as well as legal considerations, in the light
of all circumstances after the passage of time, but before justice
is allowed to overrun mercy in the name of the power of the state.
I fully realize that reasonable men hold strong feelings on both
sides of every case where executive clemency is indicated. I ac-
cepted the responsibility of being Governor, however, and I will
not shy away from the responsibility of exercising the power of
executive clemency.
After careful consideration, I have today signed orders grant-
ing executive clemency of some degree to twenty-nine prisoners.
These are all a matter of public record, but I would call your
attention to seven of them because of widespread public interest.
I have reduced the sentences of seven of the men involved in
the Henderson strike by three years each. Thus four are eligible
for parole immediately, and Auslander, Payton, and Gore will
Statements and Articles
553
be eligible for parole later this summer. (The eighth, Malcolm
Jarrell, was released on parole in April.)
The prison record always has been one of the considerations,
and outstanding work has been done by one of these men in
teaching illiterates at Central Prison how to read and write.
ON EMPLOYMENT OF EX-PRISONERS
July 27, 1961
The highest purpose of our entire system of criminal justice
is to return convicted offenders to free society willing and able
to meet the responsibilities and to earn the rewards of citizen-
ship in a democracy. This system will fail to accomplish its high
purpose if forced to operate in a society that rejects the released
prisoner. This should be an obvious truth. It apparently is not.
Far too many good citizens fail to appreciate the effect of their
open and automatic hostility toward persons who have served
time in our prisons.
When a prisoner is ready to return to free society, he too fre-
quently finds the doors to the prison open to let him out, but
the doors of opportunity for constructive living are closed to him
in the free community. Some employers automatically reject ap-
plicants who are ex-prisoners. This unfortunate policy places a
frustrating obstacle in the paths of those who sincerely desire to
rise above their mistakes and live as law-abiding citizens.
Put yourself in the position of a person who has committed an
offense and found himself in prison. You behave yourself, acquire
good work habits and useful skills, learn how to use idle time
constructively, become a member of Alcoholics Anonymous, re-
ceive and profit from religious and social counseling, learn how
to study, and rediscover the value of reading good books. You
are released. You go home to your wife and children ready and
willing to act the part of a good husband, father, and citizen.
Then no one will hire you because you have served time in
prison. How would you react?
This week, Director J. Edgar Hoover reported F.B.I, statistics
showing that our country's crime rate is growing four times
faster than our population. The public is and should be alarmed
by this fact. Yet it is not enough to press for apprehension and
conviction of a criminal. Tax money spent to put an offender
into prison and keep him there will be largely wasted if he does
not leave prison ready and able to make an honest living in free
554
Papers of Terry Sanford
society. It is important to remember that 97 per cent of those
committed to prison are released. We believe our Prison Depart-
ment's varied programs are preparing our prisoners for construc-
tive citizenship. Whether they will be able to take their proper
place in free society will depend in large part upon the willing-
ness of employers to give them fair consideration for employ-
ment. Anything that can be done to reduce the difficulties ex-
prisoners face in finding gainful employment will lessen the
dangers of their slipping back into crime and returning to swell
the population of our prisons. A repeater back in prison is a
burden on the taxpayers. An ex-prisoner employed in the free
community is a taxpayer contributing to the support of govern-
mental services. Prisoners' families swell the welfare rolls. Em-
ployed ex-prisoners support themselves and their families. There-
fore, every employer who finds it possible to hire an ex-prisoner
is serving his own self-interest as well as contributing to the good
of society as a whole.
Many employers have told us how pleased they are by the job
performance of the ex-prisoners they have hired. They also com-
ment favorably on the fact that the Prison Department provides
them with useful and comprehensive information about prisoners
seeking employment. These employers have found that they can
rely upon the Prison Department's statements concerning the
applicant's physical condition, attitude, special problems, as well
as particular abilities. We hope our reporting of the favorable
results obtained by the employers who have used ex-prisoners
trained by the Prison Department will convince many other
employers that they have been missing out on a good deal.
I believe state government should take the lead in giving fair
consideration to job applicants who are ex-prisoners. We can
hardly expect to convince private enterprise of the merits of an
enlightened employment policy concerning ex-prisoners unless
we demonstrate the courage of our own declared convictions. I
have asked that a study be made of the employment policies and
regulations of state agencies in order to find and test the validity
of any that bar ex-prisoners.
I am proud of the teamwork exemplified by the presence here
of officials representing the Employment Security Commission,
State Board of Public Welfare, Board of Paroles, and the Prison
Department. I am pleased that the press, radio, and television
representatives are giving wide publicity to our intensified efforts
to expand and improve the prisoner job placement program. I
hope that these efforts and this publicity will bring to our pro-
gram additional support from representatives of industry, busi-
Statements and Articles
555
ness, farm groups, civic clubs, churches, and interested individ-
uals. I am here and now appealing for such support. Please send
to me or to the Director of Prisons any suggestions you may have
for improving this vital program.
ON THE DEATH OF LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR
H. CLOYD PHILPOTT
August 19, 1961 :
This is a shattering blow to the state and to Mrs. Sanford and
me personally. No one could have asked for a dearer or a better
friend, and no one could have expected more conscientious and
able service to the state he served so well in so many ways.
I have said on numerous occasions, and I must emphasize
again now, that there would have been no quality education
program except for Cloyd Philpott. He endorsed it in the heat
and danger of his own campaign, and he sustained it and me in
the legislative battles.
School children, and indeed all of North Carolina, will be the
beneficiaries of his life's service for generations to come.
STATEMENT OF FRIENDSHIP WITH MEXICO
September 10, 1961
[Governor and Mrs. Sanford and Press Secretary Graham Jones flew to
Mexico to promote the AlHance for Progress and to create interest in the
North Carolina International Trade Fair to be held in Charlotte the next
month. The party visited President Lopez Mateos, toured housing develop-
ments, the university, visited medical centers and industrial plants, con-
ferred with public officials, and enjoyed a state dinner at the United States
embassy.]
I deem it an honor to be in Mexico as a guest of your govern-
ment and to have the opportunity to meet, to know, and better
to understand the people of this country of freedom and friend-
ship.
I think that misunderstanding stems from lack of knowledge
and personal contact with people. You can read history books
and sociology treatises, which naturally help, but nothing com-
pares to personal communication with the men who are working
actively to better the condition of their own people.
556
Papers of Terry Sanford
I look forward with special interest to meeting President
Lopez Mateos, whose speeches I have read with great interest.
He is a strong leader in Latin America and, indeed, in all of the
Americas. He has greatly manifested his ideas in international
politics with understanding and respect for all countries within
freedom and a democratic form of life.
I believe that only within the framework of law and democ-
racy can we achieve the goal of higher standards of living that
this restless time of ours is challenging us to attain.
Our two countries are good friends working together for peace
and progress. Mexico and the United States can be even better
friends in the future and more effective partners in the efforts
that have to be permanent for the achievement of progress in the
alliance to which we belong.
ON THE GOVERNOR'S COMMISSION ON EDUCATION
BEYOND THE HIGH SCHOOL
September 15, 1961
Education, more than any other service of the state, enables
us to build the foundation of the future.
After considering the recommendations of the State Board of
Higher Education and after conferences with representatives of
the board and other educational leaders, I have decided to ap-
point a Governor's Commission on Education Beyond the High
School.
The purpose of such a commission at this time is (1) to iden-
tify and define the State's needs in higher education, and other
education beyond or in lieu of the high school, and (2) to rec-
ommend the most efficient plans and methods of meeting those
needs.
The use of such a commission is a part of our determination
to see that the taxpayers get maximum returns in both quality
and quantity of education for their dollars.
The commission will be charged with the responsibility of
making a comprehensive study of the state's entire system of pub-
lic supported higher education, including all institutions and
agencies offering educational and instructional curriculums and
services beyond the high school.
No limitations will be imposed upon the commission's broad
powers because it is deemed wise that it shall work as an inde-
pendent agency of the state and with complete freedom to exer-
Statements and Articles
557
cise the collective judgment of its members in making its final
recommendations. Without limiting the broad authority of the
commission, I am suggesting that specific attention be given to
the following questions:
A. Enrollments:
1. For maximum progress in North Carolina, what are the
numbers of students who should be enrolled for education
beyond the high school by types of institutions and by years
for the next several decades?
2. What is the optimum growth plan for existing institu-
tions?
3. What should be the basis of selection and distribution
of students among institutions of different types and pur-
poses?
4. What policies should we employ to get a larger percent-
age of our high school graduates in college?
5. What policies should we employ to reduce the high per-
centage of student "dropouts"?
B. Faculties:
1. How many faculty members will be needed to provide
instruction at desired levels and standards?
2. What salary levels must be provided for the faculties?
C. Improved Utilization:
1. What principles should be established to promote greater
utilization of physical facilities and faculties of individual
institutions?
2. To what extent might joint use of libraries, physical
plants, equipment, and personnel be feasible?
D. New Institutions:
1. Is the present Community College Act an adequate in-
strument of policy for the development and operation of an
effective system of public supported community or junior
colleges, and what amendments, if any, are desirable?
2. What standards should be adopted in determining the
need for the establishment of additional four-year colleges?
3. Should the need for resources and facilities of higher
education in the more populous areas be met by establishing
additional branches of the university or existing four-year
colleges in those areas?
E. Allocation of Functions:
I. What policies should be adopted in the allocation of
558
Papers of Terry San ford
educational functions among existing and future institii^
tions to avoid unnecessary duplication?
2. What is the best system for co-ordinating the two-year
educational programs and the technical programs of the
community colleges with the educational and technical pro-
grams of the industrial educational centers?
3. How may the state-supported institutions of higher edu-
cation and the privately supported and church related in-
stitutions co-ordinate their efforts and resources in meeting
the educational needs of our people?
F. Financing:
1. How much will a reasonable program of education be-
yond the high school cost during the next fifteen years in
capital improvements and operating expenses?
2. Is the present system of line item budgeting for institu-
tions of higher education adequate and desirable, and, if
not, what changes should be made?
3. What should be the distribution of costs as between the
state and the students?
4. What is the trend of tax resources in North Carolina?
What is the state's ability to pay?
5. What are prospective outside sources of financial sup-
port?
G. Co-ordination:
1. What should be the pattern of relationships among all
types of publicly supported institutions beyond the high
school? Specifically, what should be the relationship among
the two-year academic and technical programs of college
grade and the programs offered by the industrial education
centers; the undergraduate program of the senior colleges
and the university?
2. What is the best structure for public policy control and
co-ordination of publicly supported institutions?
3. What means for consultation and co-operative planning
may be devised whereby private and public institutions in
the state may contribute most effectively in meeting the
needs of the state?
H. Specialization:
What should be the plan of development of specialized, pro-
fessional, and post-baccalaureate education such as medicine,
law, graduate education; extended education, including ed-
ucational television, adult education, and off-campus cen-
ters? [Here followed a list of persons appointed to the com-
Statements and Articles
559
mission. See list of appointments, pages 741-742.]
I am asking Irving Carlyle to serve as chairman. I recommend
that the commission employ a full-time secretary. Expenses must
be approved in advance by the Council of State.
I am requesting that interim reports be furnished, and that
the final report be filed no later than September 1, 1962.
URGING ECONOMY IN GOVERNMENT
November 25, 1961
Every time I go to Washington, I come away with the feeling
that a far more efficient job could be done with fewer people.
Bogged down in an overly-protective civil service system, it is
almost impossible for the Congress and the executive to do any-
thing about it. This has been true equally of both parties.
In state government across the nation we have fewer problems,
but nevertheless some of the same influences are working against
efficiency. Generally in North Carolina we do have able, con-
scientious, and hard-working state employees, and all citizens
should be proud of the way these employees have served the
state.
Still I have always been convinced that there are many ways
we can save money, employ fewer people, and improve the es-
sential services.
There are certain services where personnel cannot be reduced
but must indeed increase as the population grows. One example
is that every time we have approximately thirty more pupils in
school, we will have a need for one more teacher.
But there are other services where we need not increase per-
sonnel in line with the population in order to provide the serv-
ices needed for the people.
I have today written all department and agency heads, asking
them to look actively for ways to save on their budgets. I have
asked them to furnish us a memo at the end of each month on
any actions they have taken to save money. I have reminded
them to realize that the General Assembly, in formulating the
budget, set a limit to which they could go, not to which they
must go. These people are conscientious and economy-minded,
but the purpose of my letter is to emphasize active efforts to
save money.
I call on all state employees to join in an effort to demonstrate
560
Papers of Terry Sanford
that we can make our government more effective while saving
money for the taxpayers.
We have an obligation to tighten our own belts when so much
of the national resource must go to essential national defense.
We have an opportunity to demonstrate that governments,
state and federal, can be made effective and economical.
We also have a duty, which we will not forget, to make state
services adequately fulfill the proper needs of the people.
CHRISTMAS STATEMENT
December 20, 1961
It is in keeping with the heritage of men of good will the
world over to pause from their work to commemorate Christ-
mas. In this year of Our Lord, 1961, when a godless ideology
challenges the peace, the freedom, and the very existence of men
and nations of good will, it is especially appropriate that we
should honor the birth of the Prince of Peace.
The spirit of Christmas is universal. In our small part of the
universe, here in North Carolina, we join fellow pilgrims the
world over in turning our attention to the manger and the hope
which rose from it for persons of all races, colors, creeds, and
nations.
We will pray that we may celebrate next Christmas and the
succeeding Christmases in peace. We will also pray for the
strength and the courage that, in peace or war, future Christ-
mases shall be celebrated in freedom.
We will pray finally that neither rockets, nor satellites, nor
the mushroom clouds of nuclear bombs will ever obscure our
sight from the Star in the East which heralded peace on earth,
good will to men.
ON THE BURCH-BREWER CASE
January 7, 1962
[This initial statement issued by Governor Sanford marked the beginning
of a year-long legal drama centering on Robert Burch, career highway engi-
neer for twenty-two years; Bobby Burch, his son, and Kidd Brewer, Raleigh
businessman and political aspirant. The two men were convicted in July
of conspiring to divert highway funds. The defendants lost in their appeals
Statements and Articles
561
of the decision and began serving prison terms in 1963. Bobby Burch, con-
victed of "influencing agents" and fined, was pardoned by the Governor in
November, 1963.]
Investigation completed this week end has confirmed that
Highway Department engineer Robert A. Burch has for several
years been too closely associated with Mr. Kidd Brewer in con-
nection with funds received from companies selling sign mate-
rials to the State Highway Commission. Mr. Burch has the
responsibility for procurement of signs.
Apparently these funds were paid by sign companies to a
company organized by Mr. Brewer, Interstate Services, Inc., and
in turn paid by Mr. Brewer's company to the college-age son of
Mr. Burch.
Therefore, Mr. Burch has been fired today, effective at the
close of business last Friday.
Our investigative files have been turned over to the Attorney
General.
Since 1958 Mr. Brewer's company has been paid approximately
$80,000 by certain sign companies receiving state business, and
approximately $40,000 of this amount was paid over by Mr.
Brewer's company to Mr. Burch's son. This company's operating
expense for this period amounted to about $1,500.
The companies making payments to Mr. Brewer's company
will be suspended from doing further business with the state,
and additional action will be determined by the additional in-
vestigation now being conducted.
At least the following companies are involved: Traffic and Street
Sign Co., Newark, New Jersey; Pfaff and Kendall, Newark, New
Jersey; Wald Industries, Huntingdon, Pennsylvania; NSE Signs
and Stampings division of National Safety Engineers, Inc., Bir-
mingham, Alabama [and subsequently Minnesota Mining and
Manufacturing Company, St. Paul, Minnesota.]
[On January 18 the following summary of the S.B.I, preliminary report
was released through the Governor's Office.]
(It will be understood that the purpose of making this report
public is to reveal the pertinent facts resulting in the discharge
of Robert A. Burch, but that certain proof, details, and corre-
spondence should remain confidential pending determination of
legal action.)
In addition to the approximately $85,000 already reported,
Mr. Kidd Brewer also received an additional amount of $148,000
from a company selling products on specifications prepared by
Mr. Robert A. Burch. This amount was paid in a round-about
manner.
562
Papers of Terry Sanford
Between August, 1955, and December 15, 1961, Minnesota
Mining and Manufacturing Company paid approximately $148,-
000 to Parkway Company, Inc., a small retail hardware store
operated in Boone by Mr. Paul Armfield Coffey, Brewer's neph-
ew. Parkway Company in turn paid this money in full over to
Underwriters Insurance Company of North Carolina, an insur-
ance business operated by Brewer in Raleigh, North Carolina.
The payment checks going from Parkway to Underwriters were
then endorsed "for deposit only to the account of Kidd Brewer."
Apparently this Brewer account was drawn on for college pay-
ments on behalf of Robert M. Burch.
According to the Highway Department, "Mr. Robert A. Burch
wrote specifications for all sign projects for the entire state. The
Bridge Department or roadway contractors on various projects
had nothing to do with the sign projects. That some time after
a project was underway and Mr. Burch's employees (i.e., those
under his supervision) thought the erection of signs would not
interfere with the construction of the highway, the sign specifi-
cations would be written. Other departments and contractors
working on the roadway or bridge had nothing to do with where
signs were placed or what specifications were written."
Mr. Burch also had the responsibility of drawing specifications
for products utilizing reflective materials. All of these specifica-
tions must conform with interstate standards, but one material
could be favored, while still conforming.
Officials of Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company
state that Mr. Brewer's services were retained by them because
of "people" he knew in state government, but they explained
that Robert A. Burch was the only state official they knew was
contacted. There is no evidence that anyone else was contacted
about signs or sign materials by Mr. Brewer, and no one else
would have been in a position to determine specifications.
There is no evidence that the Minnesota Mining and Manu-
facturing Company knew that anything was paid to Mr. Burch's
son, but there is a notation in the company files: "As you may
know, in his capacity as traffic engineer for North Carolina, Mr.
Burch has been very influential for a number of years in getting
our products used by that state."
Interstate Services, Inc., received payments as follows. This
money was split between Mr. Brewer and Mr. Robert M. Burch.
Statements and Articles
563
Traffic and Street Sign Company
Prismo Safety Corporation
Wald Industries, Inc.
National Safety Engineers
Southern Aluminum and Steel Corporation
Union Metal Manufacturing Company
Pfaff and Kendall
$41,192.46
31,032.60
3,062.31
2,444.37
6,043.02
500.00
754.85
ON PRIDE IN NORTH CAROLINA'S PROGRESS
January 11, 1962
[On January 10 Governor Sanford had casually stated that the governor-
ship had put an end to further political ambitions. Later, when asked to
face the question of his future in a more serious context, he admitted the
earlier statement was somewhat exaggerated. This statement, made the
next day, confirmed the Governor's strong interest in North Carolina and
his desire to be of service.]
I call your attention to the February issue of National Geo-
graphic. The lead article, entitled "North Carolina, Dixie Dy-
namo," is a forty-three page story and contains about four dozen
attractive illustrations. Malcolm Ross, who has spent a great
deal of time in North Carolina, has done a wonderful job. I hope
that every North Carolinian will read it.
I have great enthusiasm for what can be done in North Caro-
lina. After having been in office for one year, that enthusiasm
has grown even more. There is nothing more interesting than
the Governor's Office. I have enjoyed every hour of every day.
People in this state, as in other states, have always been divided
between those who are willing to rock along, and those who are
willing to plan and work for better things for the people. It was
this way in Governor Aycock's day and it has been this way ever
since.
I plan to continue to work with those who believe in progress,
who have faith in our capacity, who want to make the oppor-
tunities for people in North Carolina just as great as opportun-
ities people have anywhere else in the country.
These are the people I've always been with, and these are the
people I intend to work with for the rest of my life.
Let not a casual statement about my future plans to run for
office be interpreted as a diminishing interest in North Carolina.
564
Papers of Terry Sanford
ON THE PORTS AUTHORITY BONDS MATTER
March 2, 1962
Several proposals to purchase revenue bonds have been made
to the North Carolina State Ports Authority, the proceeds of the
sale to be used to continue a much needed expansion program.
The idea of financing port expansion by issuing revenue bonds
has been before the ports policy-makers since 1959. This is a
sound method of financing, and a businesslike approach to meet-
ing our needs.
When the North Carolina legislature created the Ports Author-
ity, it specifically granted powers to operate without restrictions
for the purpose of stimulating trade and commerce throughout
North Carolina, and the undertaking has been profitable in many
ways. The idea of allowing seaport authorities to operate as a
business rather than an institution is "as old as the Port of Lon-
don" itself.
The intention of the legislature when creating the Ports Au-
thority was to allow the financing of operations and expansion
without risking the full faith and credit of the state or obligating
the taxpayers. Issuing of revenue bonds does not obligate the
taxpayers.
The same policy exists at other ports along the Atlantic. Re-
cently, for example, Norfolk has sold |27 million worth of reve-
nue bonds, $15 million of which will be expended on one facility.
The Georgia Ports Authority just sold $11.5 million worth of
revenue bonds, which was in addition to an expansion of $5.5
million from revenue bonds completed recently. None of those
pledged the credit of the state.
With all this expansion up and down the eastern seaboard
financed by revenue bonds, there is considerable interest by pri-
vate capital in financing the North Carolina State Ports Expan-
sion Program through the revenue bonds of the North Carolina
State Ports Authority.
Recently, D. Leon Williams, Executive Director of the North
Carolina State Ports Authority, said: "If we are to keep pace
with expanding foreign trade and continue to discharge our duty
to the utmost to stimulate the commerce of North Carolina, we
must keep pace with our neighbors and we should not put off
any longer the opportunity of financial and useful gain that our
present momentum of expansion is producing."
We are developing these possibilities of revenue bonds. We
will have additional information very soon.
Statements and Articles
565
DESIGNATING PEACE CORPS DAY
March 12, 1962
The United States has sent young men overseas to fight for
democracy in three wars during the last fifty years.
On March 1, 1961, under the leadership of President John F.
Kennedy and with the approval of the Congress, this nation
began sending a new kind of corps to other lands to fight for
freedom— the Peace Corps.
Members of the Peace Corps go armed with the education and
the training and the talents of America. They carry textbooks
instead of rifles and medical kits rather than ammunition bando-
leers.
The enemies these young Americans are fighting are disease
and ignorance and poverty.
On March 16 and 17, a conference on the Peace Corps will be
held at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Therefore, I am happy to designate Saturday, March 17, as
Peace Corps Day in North Carolina
ON PER CAPITA INCOME
May 1, 1962
I am happy to note that North Carolina has moved upward
two notches in per capita income as compared with other states.
In 1960 we moved from forty-fifty to forty-fourth and in 1961,
to forty-second. This shows progress.
If we counted the per capita income of only the white citizens
we would rank thirty-second instead of forty-second.
This is some indication that the inability of the qualified
Negro to find adequate employment drags down the economy of
the entire state.
This is our problem and it requires our best minds and big-
gest hearts. It is not the problem of government as much as it is
the problem of all citizens.
This lack of adequate opportunities has long been on the con-
science of many people of the state, but we can be sure it is also
a detrimental force on our joint and many efforts to raise the
economy of the state.
566
Papers of Terry Sanford
ON THE DEATH OF CHARLIE GOLD
June 28, 1962
In the death of Charlie Gold, thousands of North Carolinians
have lost a personal friend and all North Carolinians have lost
an outstanding public leader and servant.
He spent most of his adult life in the service of his state and
nation.
As Commissioner of Insurance, Charlie Gold constantly put
the public interest first. The citizens of North Carolina returned
that faith by demonstrating their overwhelming confidence in
him in 1956 and again in 1960.
I have ordered state flags to be flown at half-mast in respect
to the service he rendered to North Carolina.
ON THE DEATHS OF NORTH CAROLINA OFFICERS
IN VIET NAM
July 19, 1962
As we go about our daily lives in a free and peaceful land, we
sometimes forget there are many nations in which war— hot war
—is being waged and in which freedom is yet to be won.
The death last Saturday in Viet Nam of Captain Don J. York of
Asheville, and the deaths of Captain Robert D. Larson of
Fayetteville, Chief Warrant Officer Joseph Goldberg of Sanford,
and Specialist-5 Harold Lee Guthrie of Route 7, Burlington, are
a grim reminder that there are jungles of despotism yet to be
cleared and that these jungles still threaten to encroach on lands
of those who would be free.
Captain York, Captain Larson, Warrant Officer Goldberg, and
Specialist-5 Guthrie did not have to be in Viet Nam. The United
States does not have to concern itself with Viet Nam.
We could let the Communists have it by default.
But our nation learned at Pearl Harbor that the only isolation
which is possible is the isolation of the grave— where dictators
periodically attempt to assign us.
Captain York, Captain Larson, Warrant Officer Goldberg, and
Specialist-5 Guthrie, like so many Americans before them, died
in a strange place, halfway around the world from their homes,
in a conflict that seems very remote and of little significance.
Statements and Articles
567
But their stand in Viet Nam is as near to us in fact as the
stand of the men of Kings Mountain during the Revolution or
the fight against enemy submarines off the coast of North Caro-
lina during World War II.
All North Carolinians and all Americans owe these men a
salute.
In recognition of the fact that they died for the freedom of
North Carolina as well as for the freedom of Viet Nam, I am
ordering the state flag on the Capitol to be flown at half-mast
on Friday, July 20.
ON THE SAVING OF TAX FUNDS
August 4, 1962
During this past year, we have saved $17,078,149 of appro-
priated funds, and this amount has reverted to the General Fund.
This reversion is the largest saving since the enactment of the
Executive Budget Act of 1925.
This saving of tax funds compares favorably with the unex-
pended appropriations from the General Fund for the last six
preceding fiscal years which have averaged $8,452,040 a year.
This saving has been a result of our determined policy to keep
the state on the go while being extremely careful about spending
money. These two goals are not incompatible as the record of
this first fiscal year demonstrates.
It is in keeping with our record of a relatively high degree of
services while ranking next to the bottom, forty-ninth, in per
capita state and local tax expenditures.
It is a result of co-operation by every state department head
and proof of the eagle eyes of Hugh Cannon and David Coltrane.
I congratulate all of the agency heads and state employees who
have made this record possible. Their results have been outstand-
ing. They have clearly demonstrated that they are dedicated to
giving our citizens a sound return on the tax dollar.
ON THE PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
CENTER
September 5, 1962
[This statement, prepared in the Governor's Office, was delivered by
Congressman Horace Komegay before the House Appropriations Subcom-
568
Papers of Terry Sanford
mittee considering location of the proposed Environmental Health Center.
During Governor Sanford's last week in office, he announced the federal
government's choice of the Research Triangle as the site of the future
research facility.]
Chairman Thomas and Members of the Subcommittee:
I have requested Congressman Kornegay to read the following
statement on behalf of the state of North Carolina, which state-
ment is endorsed by the undersigned members of Congress.
The state of North Carolina invites the attention of the De-
ficiencies Subcommittee of the House Committee on Appropria-
tions to the Research Triangle Park of North Carolina as a
desirable site for the proposed Environmental Health Center of
the United States Public Health Service.
The Research Triangle Park is a body of land located within
a triangle formed by the University of North Carolina in Chapel
Hill, Duke University in Durham, and North Carolina State
College of the University of North Carolina in Raleigh. Already
a number of nationally known concerns have established research
laboratories in the area. These three great institutions have on
their faculties outstanding leaders of academic and professional
talent, some of whom are expert in the field of environmental
health. These universities can make invaluable contributions to
the center's work.
The Environmental Health Center is a project that has been
initiated by the United States Public Health Service. That serv-
ice is recommending that the center be located in the Washing-
ton area. This project was submitted to Congress last year but
was rejected by the Senate Appropriations Committe on the
ground that "the contemplated site is an extremely poor selec-
tion and that inadequate justification was presented in support
of the request." This year the Public Health Service revived the
project and has again recommended a site in the Washington
area.
In March of this year, the state of North Carolina decided to
make known to the proper federal authorities the advantages of
locating this center in the Research Triangle Park of North
Carolina. A representative of mine accordingly made inquiries
early in March as to the stage to which the project had developed
at that time.
We then presented to Secretary Abraham Ribicoff and the
Deputy Director of the Budget, Mr. Elmer Staats, the many ad-
vantages to the United States government of locating the center
in the North Carolina Research Triangle rather than in the
Statements and Articles
569
Washington area, including the fact that adequate land for the
center would be given to the government without cost.
It seems to me that there are some very compelling reasons
for locating the Environmental Health Center in the Research
Triangle Park rather than in the Washington area or in fact any
other area within the United States. Some of these reasons are
as follows:
1. Locating the center in the Research Triangle Park would
save the government and the American taxpayers initially a sum
of $1,300,000 which the present supplemental budget proposes
for land acquisition.
2. Construction costs in the Research Triangle are reported
by the F. W. Dodge Company to be 80 per cent of construction
costs in the Washington area. These lower construction costs in
the Research Triangle area apply not only to public buildings,
but would also reduce building costs for private dwellings and
all other projects that would have to be built, such as roads,
utilities, etc. I understand that the long-range plans for the
Environmental Health Center contemplate eventual construction
costs of several hundred million dollars. Locating the center in
the Research Triangle Park would, therefore, effect a saving to
the federal government in construction costs alone possibly in
excess of $50 million over those in the Washington area.
3. In the event of enemy attack, the risk of damage to the
center is much less if it is located in the Research Triangle rather
than in the Washington area. The Washington area, with its
concentration of governmental operations, is certain to be a
prime object of enemy attack. The continuing operation of the
center, after enemy attack in any part of the country, may be of
vital importance to survival. No matter how conscientiously its
advance planning may be, unforeseen problems will almost surely
arise. In such event, the fact that an Environmental Health or-
ganization of experts is in existence and functioning may mean
the saving of thousands of lives.
4. The foregoing considerations would seem to outweigh any
arguments in favor of the Washington area based on its prox-
imity to the administrative branches of the Public Health Serv-
ice, the research activities of the National Institutes of Health
and the related programs of other departments of the govern-
ment. Decentralization has been highly successful in the cases of
the Communicable Diseases Center in Atlanta, Georgia, and the
various laboratories of the Atomic Energy Commission, among
others. It would likewise be successful if the proposed Environ-
mental Health Center is located in the Research Triangle. There
570
Papers of Terry Sanford
would not appear to be the same need for a research facility's
proximity to the administrative offices of the various related gov-
ernment agencies that there is for the ordinary kind of opera-
tional agency. Administrative control of the center will be largely
by telephone wherever the center is located. Furthermore, with
the Washington National Airport approximately sixty minutes
from the Research Triangle and with eight flights daily in each
direction, the Research Triangle will be practically as accessible
to administrative offices in Washington as a Maryland site, which
must be reached through Washington traffic.
5. If placed in the Research Triangle area, the facilities of
the center will be located in a planned research park, designed
to function properly and to be attractive even when filled to
capacity. Likewise, the surrounding region's development is com-
pletely supervised by a regional planning commission and enjoys
the full co-operation of all local governments.
6. It seems to me that there is a great need for research facili-
ties to be related to educational institutions. The government
draws off far too many scientific personnel who, if close to uni-
versities, could assist in the training of additional young scien-
tists.
The foregoing statement is simply a concise summary of our
position, which has been more fully stated in the presentation
made last spring. It is hoped that the members of the subcommit-
tee will use their influence to suggest that it would be to the
advantage of the government to locate this facility away from
the crowded Washington area.
DESIGNATING YOUTH APPRECIATION WEEK
November 9, 1962
The America of tomorrow will be largely dependent upon the
capabilities, the initiative, and the moral and religious fiber of
the youth of today.
Today's climate of world affairs confronts our youth with a
multitude of decisions, uncertainties, and frustrations heretofore
unexceeded.
Publicity has been given to crimes committed by, and the
delinquency of, a small percentage of our youth to the extent
that there has resulted in some areas a widespread doubt as to
the quality and integrity of the nation's youth.
Statements and Articles
571
To the contrary, statistics show that approximately 5 per cent
of them are delinquent.
The delinquency of the 5 per cent reflects no discredit on
the remaining 95 per cent, many of whom are engaging, of their
own initiative, in wholesome and constructive civic and religious
activities to the betterment of our nation and its communities.
Therefore, I am happy to designate the week of November
12-18, 1962, as
Youth Appreciation Week
in this state and call upon the parents and other citizens in the
state to join with Optimist International in recognizing the qual-
ities and merits of our youth and to make our appreciation
known to them.
ON MEDICAL CARE FOR INDIGENTS
December 26, 1962
The 1961 General Assembly transferred the administration of
funds for the hospitalization of medically indigent patients from
the Medical Care Commission to the Department of Public Wel-
fare. This transfer made federal matching funds available for
the medically indigent for the first time.
Our state also has taken advantage of the Kerr-Mills Act which
increased the federal matching formula for medical care of per-
sons sixty-five and over.
In these two ways, medical care through hospitalization to peo-
ple who cannot pay for it has been greatly extended in North
Carolina in recent months.
In spite of this progress, I am not satisfied with medical care
for the aged. I believe that people, especially older people who
have worked hard all of their lives and have only meager savings,
are entitled to know that they are not going to suffer needlessly
because of inadequate medical care.
I am asking a special committee to study the wider use of
Kerr-Mills, and other available means of assuring proper medical
care for older people. I am sure that they can have ready the
necessary legislation to provide adequate hospitalization, outpa-
tient services in hospitals or other qualified facilities, drugs, and
possibly dental services and home nursing care. [The statement
concluded with a list of persons appointed to serve on the com-
mittee.]
572
Papers of Terry Sanford
DESIGNATING CARL SANDBURG DAY
December 27, 1962
January 6, 1963, will mark the eighty-fifth birthday anniver-
sary of Carl Sandburg, poet of devotion, biographer by work,
and Tar Heel by choice.
Carl Sandburg was a son of the Midwest whose poetry gave
us a definition of the new values of the urban industrial society.
Carl Sandburg had written most of his poetry and his classic,
Abraham Lincoln^ when he decided to come East, to relax and
write his autobiography.
In 1940 the Sandburgs roamed up and down the eastern sea-
board to look for "the place," and they came to the Connemara
Farms at Flat Rock, North Carolina. They decided to look no
further. In sight of Mount Mitchell, Carl Sandburg put on his
eye-shade and wrote the first volume of his autobiography,
Always the Young Strangers, and soon, in his speeches across the
country, he began to say: "I am a Tar Heel," and in a speech in
Los Angeles during the presidential campaign of 1960, he told
the audience: "I am just a North Carolina mountain boy. . . ."
It is therefore fitting that the state of North Carolina honor
this great American on his eighty-fifth birthday as testimony to
the spiritual wealth he has created for us and for our youth and
for Americans yet unborn.
Therefore, I am happy to designate January 6, 1963, as
Carl Sandburg Day
and on behalf of his four and one-half million fellow citizens of
North Carolina, I wish him many more years of good health and
good fortune in the sapphire hills of North Carolina.
DESIGNATING JOB CORPS WEEK
January 2, 1963
Twenty per cent of the families in America have incomes of
less than $3,000 a year. These Americans are deprived of many
of the benefits and even necessities which are part of an adequate
standard of living. The young men and women born in these
families are severely handicapped in their efforts to get a good
education and to learn the skills which will permit them to move
into a better world.
Statements and Articles
573
Thousands of these deprived Americans live in North Caro-
lina. We are now using every resource of the state, county, and
municipal governments to help these families— and their young-
sters—break out of this cycle of poverty.
A new federal program, the Job Corps, holds unusual promise
for helping us with this problem. The Job Corps will provide
away-from-home training centers for young men and women
from sixteen to twenty-one. At these centers these youngsters will
have a chance to improve their basic educational skills, and re-
ceive vocational training to help them find and keep work when
they return home. While they are in training, they will receive
food, clothing, shelter, pocket money, and severance pay upon
completion of their Job Corps program. They will also he able
to send family allotments home while they are in training.
I want to be sure that every one of these youngsters has a
chance to escape from the cycle of deprivation in which they
live. I want to be sure that every young man and woman in
North Carolina who can use Job Corps training finds out about
it.
During the week of January 3, 1963, the Job Corps will con-
duct a nation-wide effort to bring its message to the attention of
needy youngsters. Job Corps recruiting materials are being dis-
tributed throughout our country by private and governmental
organizations. An all-out effort is being made to get the youth—
those whom the Job Corps can best help— to respond by sending
in cards showing their interest.
To make sure the Job Corps news is spread, state agencies
which come in close contact with these youngsters— the State
Board of Public Welfare, and the State Employment Security
Commission— will give priority to distributing Job Corps recruit-
ing news to the young men and women who need it. I urge that
local governmental agencies make a similar effort, and I hope
that the news media of our state participate in this campaign to
broadcast the Job Corps story.
Finally, in order to insure that these efforts are co-ordinated
with the national efforts of the Job Corps, I designate the week
of January 3-9, 1965, as
Job Corps Week in North Carolina
574
Papers of Terry Sanford
PROCLAIMING THE TERCENTENARY OF THE
CAROLINA CHARTER OF 1663
January 4, 1963
This year, 1963, is the tercentenary of the Carolina Charter
of 1663 and is so proclaimed here today at the beginning of the
year to mark a time when all citizens of our state should educate
themselves regarding the significant events of North Carolina's
early Colonial history.
The year 1963 marks the three hundredth anniversary of the
charter by which King Charles II of England granted to the eight
Lords Proprietors "all that territory ... in America . . . within
six and thirty degrees of northern latitude and to the west as far
as the South Seas, and so southerly as far as . . . one and thirty
degrees of north latitude. . . ."
The century that followed this event witnessed the successful
outcome of the colony's struggles to overcome obstacles to its
growth by the application of its God-given resources and the de-
termination of its people. The century 1663-1763 saw the rein-
forcement of the early English settlers by the migrations of
Highland Scots, Scotch-Irish, and Germans of the Moravian
Brethren, so that a population of less than 5,000 at the start of
the period grew to more than 200,000 by its close. The charac-
ter of those peoples has shaped the attitudes of North Carolinians
throughout their history.
This charter is a major landmark in the early history of North
Carolina and America, because it conferred upon its settlers the
rights enjoyed by Englishmen under the laws of England.
This is a year to know more about North Carolina, and our
history, and the contributions made by early Carolinians to the
development of the American character, with a pride in our rich
past, and with a new strength to develop a richer future.
ON INDUSTRIAL PROGRESS
January 10, 1963
North Carolina was the fastest growing state in the nation's
fastest growing region in new industry in 1962.
The economy of North Carolina reached an all-time high
during the past year. This is indicated by all major indexes of
business and personal economic growth including the following:
Two international trade fairs were held in Charlotte during the Sanford adminis-
tration. Here the Governor and Nat Carson are shown at the fair sitting in the
world's largest upholstered chair, April 28, 1963.
Statements and Articles
575
1. North Carolinians gainfully employed in all nonagricul-
tural jobs numbered 40,200 above the same period in 1961. For
the first eleven months of 1962— the latest period on which tabu-
lations have been completed— an average of 1,249,300 persons
were employed in nonagricultural jobs. For the same period in
1961, the average was 1,209,100.
2. Retail and wholesale activity in North Carolina reached
record levels in 1962.
3. The travel-serving industry in North Carolina, the third
largest money-producing industry in the state, set a new record
in 1962, exceeding |900 million in income last year.
4. Bank debits for North Carolina's banks were excellent. In
the nine key cities in North Carolina, bank debits rose 15.5 per
cent for the first nine months of 1962. The last quarter, due to
seasonal activity, is expected to be substantially above the first
three quarters of the year.
5. New businesses incorporated in North Carolina in 1962
reached a record high.
6. Construction of new homes and new office buildings and
new industrial plants continued to grow. In thirty-six key North
Carolina cities in 1962, building permits were up 4.2 per cent.
The permits for those cities totaled $221,254,558 in the first
eleven months of 1962.
In brief, business in North Carolina was never better.
Many people and many organizations from Raleigh west to
Asheville and Sylva, and east to Wilmington and the Outer
Banks are responsible for this record year in economic growth.
Local development groups, chambers of commerce, county
and local government leaders deserve much of the credit.
At the state level, the Board of Conservation and Develop-
ment, under the leadership of Hargrove "Skipper" Bowles, Bob
Stallings, and Jim Hinkle have worked around the clock.
They have worked with the Board of Conservation and Devel-
opment to attract new industries and, more important, to help
expand established industries.
The success of their work is reflected in the following figures:
1. The industrial gains in North Carolina in 1962 were the
highest in the Southeast, which is the fastest growing region in
America.
2. North Carolina had 567 new and expanded industrial
plants in 1962, compared to 503 new and expanded plants in
1961. Of this total, 182 were new companies and 385 were ex-
pansions of established industries.
3. Total capital investments in new plants in 1962 amounted
576
Papers of Terry Sanford
to $229,562,000. 0£ this total |95,00 1,000 was for new companies
and $134,561,000 was for expansions. The capital investments
for the record year of 1961 were $279,447,000.
4. Additional new industrial jobs totaled 24,697 in 1962. In
the record year of 1961, new industrial jobs totaled 35,000.
REPORTING SCHOOL IMPROVEMENTS
January 17, 1963
I am happy to furnish the Goldsboro News-Argus a report on
school improvement during the first two years of this adminis-
tration. I have constantly emphasized that we can expect no
overnight miracles, that we must sustain our efforts and interest
for at least ten years, and most of the work must be done locally.
But so far the results have been even more rewarding than ex-
pected.
The increased public school appropriations made by the 1961
General Assembly are buying full value in improved education
for the children of North Carolina. The vision and courage of
these legislators will be long remembered in the history of North
Carolina progress.
The firm conviction of local school superintendents is shown
in a report to the State Board of Education's Department of
Curriculum Study and Research.
Asked to list the constructive changes they can identify in
local school units as having resulted from action taken by the
1961 General Assembly and from increased local interest and
support, the following improvements are reported as taking place
all over North Carolina:
1. Improvement in the effort, interest, and attitude of teach-
ers, including improvement in the quality of applicants for
teaching positions. Many faculty groups have voluntarily gone
on an eight-hour day at school for teachers in addition to the
many hours overtime teachers work.
2. Concentration on instruction during the school day with
more emphasis on serious study and a reduction of time and
effort spent on extracurricular activities.
3. Improvement in libraries and library services, especially in
the elementary schools.
4. Reduction in class size.
Statements and Articles
577
5. Improvement in supervision by principals, supervisors, and
assistant superintendents.
6. Improvement in guidance services.
7. Provision of more teachers for special education classes.
8. Improvement resulting from clerical services for principals
and teachers.
9. Addition of needed vocational and college preparatory
courses to the high school curriculum.
10. More co-operative attitude on the part of the community,
especially in relation to eliminating interruptions of school time.
11. More serious study by students.
In the important areas of school consolidation, this state is
making marked improvement.
Accreditation of the public schools is climbing. This is impor-
tant not so much because of a certificate on a principal's wall
but because accreditation is a yardstick to measure the quality
of education being offered to our sons and daughters.
More than 500 teachers have returned to North Carolina from
teaching positions in other states since the 1961 General Assem-
bly had the courage to raise the salaries of teachers in our state.
A longer lasting effect of the quality education program has
been the increase in the number of teachers who are trained in
North Carolina colleges who have been able to afford to stay in
North Carolina to teach.
Moreover, the number of young men and women entering the
teaching profession has risen noticeably.
There are fewer teachers with substandard certificates now
than we had before adoption of the quality education program.
This improvement in the quality of instruction has had an
obvious effect on the quality of learning— and the interest by
students in learning. A considerably higher percentage of stu-
dents who enter high school now are completing their high
school work, rather than dropping out.
Of course, the greatest effect of the quality education program
will be in the pay envelopes, the homes, and the minds of the
children, your sons and daughters, and of mine, when they have
grown up.
The pay checks we will be able to measure. And it is an easily
proved fact that the better a boy's education, the higher his sal-
ary will be as a man.
To some extent we will be able to measure the effects of qual-
ity education on the future homes of North Carolina. I would
imagine that there would be better homes, more books, more
newspapers, better furnishings.
578
Papers of Terry Sanford
But the greatest result of all from the quality education pro-
gram will be one that we cannot measure on an adding machine,
or a slide rule, or even a Univac. What happens in the minds
of the young people will be the greatest result of the quality
education program.
The improved education received by Tar Heel boys and girls
will be the highest monument to the courage of the legislators
who adopted the program— and to the taxes to pay for that pro-
gram.
What happens in the minds of the boys and girls will pay the
richest dividends to the adults of North Carolina who are invest-
ing their tax dollars in their children's education.
What happens to the mind and to the spirit of North Carolina
is what the quality education program is about. And the mind
and the spirit of North Carolina will be the final judge of the
success of the quality education program.
OBSERVATION FOR A SECOND CENTURY
January 18, 1963
[Governor Sanford's leadership in the field of race relations was well
known throughout the United States. In an address to the North Carolina
Press Association, on January 18, 1963, the Governor issued two statements.
In the first, he called on North Carolinians to give up their unfair dis-
crimination practices and provide economic opportunities for Negro citizens.
In the second, he established the Good Neighbor Council which was to pro-
vide economic opportunities for qualified Negroes and which was to encour-
age young people to take advantage of opportunities for education and
training. These statements prompted letters from within the state and from
other states. A letter from Virginia stated: "It is good news that at long last
a Southern Governor has had the courage and decency to advocate fair and
equal treatment for the Negroes. Let us hope that other Southern political
leaders will be encouraged to follow your fine example. My commendation
and highest respect." Another congratulated the Governor on his "courageous
stand for equal job opportunities for Negroes in North Carolina. Your
action can certainly be hailed as a pioneer effort in the racial field at a most
crucial time. . . . The type of leadership you exemplify can be fully appreci-
ated." Another told the Governor that his statement "made me very proud
to be a North Carolinian."]
The American Negro was freed from slavery one hundred years
ago. In this century he has made much progress, educating his
children, building churches, entering into the community and
civic life of the nation.
Statements and Articles
579
Now is a time not merely to look back to freedom but forward
to the fulfillment of its meaning. Despite great progress, the
Negro's opportunity to obtain a good job has not been achieved
in most places across the country. Reluctance to accept the Negro
in employment is the greatest single block to his continued prog-
ress and to the full use of the human potential of the nation and
its states.
The time has come for American citizens to give up this re-
luctance, to quit unfair discriminations, and to give the Negro
a full chance to earn a decent living for his family and to con-
tribute to higher standards for himself and all men.
We cannot rely on law alone in this matter because much de-
pends upon its administration and upon each individual's sense
of fair play. North Carolina and its people have come to the
point of recognizing the urgent need for opening new economic
opportunities for Negro citizens. We also recognize that in doing
so we shall be adding new economic growth for everybody.
We can do this. We should do this. We will do it because we
are concerned with the problems and the welfare of our neigh-
bors. We will do it because our economy cannot afford to have
so many people fully or partially unproductive. We will do it
because it is honest and fair for us to give all men and women
their best chance in life.
ON ESTABLISHING THE GOOD NEIGHBOR COUNCIL
January 18, 1963
In North Carolina we will attempt to provide leadership for
the kind of understanding America needs today.
To carry out these hopes we will do five things right now:
1. We have established the North Carolina Good Neighbor
Council.
It will consist of twenty-four outstanding citizens of the state.
David S. Coltrane will be chairman; Dean James T. Taylor will
be vice-chairman. Coltrane is the former Director of Adminis-
tration and presently Special Consultant to the Governor. Taylor
is former Dean of Men at North Carolina College.
We will also name an additional advisory committee to reach
more sections of the economy and the state.
The council will have a twofold mission: to encourage employ-
ment of qualified people without regard to race; and to urge
youth to become better trained and qualified for employment.
580
Papers of Terry Sanford
2. We are asking all mayors and chairmen of county commis-
sioners to establish local Good Neighbor Councils.
3. We have issued a memorandum to heads of state agencies,
departments, and institutions, asking them, if they have not al-
ready done so, to examine and formulate policies which do not
exclude from employment qualified people because of race.
4. Being aware that complete success cannot be achieved with-
out wise and vigorous leadership from private business and in-
dustry, we will conduct a conference this spring, inviting leading
industrialists and businessmen to participate.
5. We call on church leaders, pastors, and civic organizations
to support the objectives of the Good Neighbor Councils in their
own effective ways.
[The statement was concluded with the names of members
of the Good Neighbor Council. For a list of these people, see
page 743.]
ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE
CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN
March 14, 1963
[This statement was made before the House Flood Control Subcommittee
in Washington at the time it was conducting hearings on a proposed Cape
Fear River Basin project. In addition to gubernatorial support, the long-
range project under discussion also received the backing of the majority of
the state's congressional delegation.]
Thank you for the chance to appear before this committee.
I am here in support of a 100-year plan for the comprehensive
development of the water and land resources of the Cape Fear
River Basin in North Carolina.
This is a plan recommended by the U. S. Army Corps of En-
gineers for developing this great river and tributaries for flood
control, water supply for municipalities, industries, and agricul-
ture, water quality control and recreation. The foundation stone
of this plan is the New Hope Reservoir. I am asking that you
authorize this project so that development of the Cape Fear
River Basin can proceed.
The need of the basin is great. Its people have waited a long
time to develop and use their land and water resources at their
full potential.
Statements and Articles
581
This project was started by Senator Kerr Scott and is being
carried on by a number of people under the able leadership of
Senator Everett Jordan. I have been interested in this project
since the days when Kerr Scott was governor. Speaking in Fay-
etteville on September 25, 1950, Governor Scott said:
. . . with the entire Cape Fear Valley pulling together for the development
of the Cape Fear River as a whole for the benefit of all, the voice would have
been much louder. ... I say, here and now, that if we do not look forward,
plan wisely, and conserve and protect these resources which are now wast-
ing, we will not only be breaking faith with future generations, but also
cheating ourselves.
The valley of the Cape Fear, stretching as it does more than 150 miles
from the piedmont to the sea, is potentially one of the richest regions of
our state. It is rich in agricultural possibilities and offers great opportunities
to diversified industry. All that is needed is vision and a singleness of purpose
to bring about its development.
The truth of that is more apparent today than ever before.
This long broad valley reaching from the Piedmont area of
our state down to the Atlantic Ocean has contributed greatly to
the progress of North Carolina from Colonial days to modern
times. In this pleasant land live 922,599 people, 20 per cent of
our population. They have built up considerable industries, a
strong agriculture, and attractive tourist facilities that are all
known far beyond our borders.
The people of the Cape Fear River Basin have achieved these
things despite a great handicap. Too many times, destructive
floods have hurt the area. These can occur at any season of the
year and in a large part of the basin. The threat of floods is hin-
dering the greater economic development which is the right of
its people.
We are told that the Corps of Engineers' plan will protect only
the lower part of the basin and do nothing for the upper area.
Yet the corps' plan would permit the building of these smaller
dams for local benefit; in fact, the corps recommends that its
own project be supplemented by upstream improvements and
land treatment measures, as provide by P. L. 566, Eighty-third
Congress.
I am in favor of building them all, because in the future we
will need all the water we can get. This is one of the best invest-
ments we can make in the future. We should impound all the
water we can at every feasible place. It will serve us well over
the years. In North Carolina we are stepping up our soil con-
servation and sound watershed program. The state legislature
doubled the survey teams so we might accelerate the whole pro-
gram. We are determined to save our water reservoirs.
582
Papers of Terry Sanford
The alternative plan of nothing but small dams of and by it-
self cannot control flooding throughout the basin. Existing fed-
eral legislation, in any event, is not adequate to put such an
undertaking into effect.
Flood protection is needed now. We have waited too long. The
Corps of Engineers' plan, keyed by the New Hope Reservoir, can
come into being almost at once.
Unfortunately, dislocations will occur to some extent each
time a public works program is placed in effect, and I regret
this. We cannot continue to progress as a nation, however, unless
we utilize our natural resources to their fullest extent and in the
best interest of the greatest number of our citizens.
I concur in the recommendations contained in the report of
the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers. As the initial step in the
development of the basin, I strongly urge that authorization for
the immediate construction of the New Hope Dam be given
favorable consideration by your committee.
I assure the committee that the state administration will do
everything within its capability to meet any nonfederal partici-
pation and co-operation that may be required in the construc-
tion of the New Hope Dam.
Thank you very much.
ON THE FUTURE OF RECREATION
IN NORTH CAROLINA
March 15, 1963
[The "Land and Living" report referred to in this statement was a
thirteen-page study of recreation trends in North Carolina. The report also
contained proposed state action to meet the growing demands for recre-
ational facilities.]
The quality of our living is inescapably related to land and
its conservation, and I am happy to release the "Land and Liv-
ing" report made by the North Carolina Recreation Commission.
Conservation includes the preservation of our land and water,
its scientific analysis as to best use, and a plan of action as to its
wise use for the full life in North Carolina and for the greatest
of economic advantage to people.
In my efforts to follow good conservation practice and best to
apply its advantages to land and water for living in North Caro-
lina, I have directed various state agencies to review the past, to
Statements and Articles
583
look ahead, to take inventory, to analyze, and to plan for the
future.
This report is the first of a series of such reports from North
Carolina state agencies. It is a preliminary report, done by our
North Carolina Recreation Commission. I have studied this
report and find well-selected data, some excellent analyses, and
some basic suggestions of great importance to North Carolina's
future.
This report predicts that:
by 1980, unless the state immediately sets a high priority on the acquisition
or other form of reservation of land holdings of scarcity value (ocean,
beaches and adjacent lands; State parks; lake and stream shores; unique
natural, historic, and scenic areas) all such lands will be lost to the North
Carolina public. These recreation areas and other resources can be conserved
and their maximum economic and other advantages assured to North Caro-
lina only if their use is programmed under competent recreation and
conservation leadership. By 1980, unless remedial steps are undertaken at
once, there will be an overwhelming deficiency of recreation land and water
and open space in and near population centers of North Carolina.
A state-wide, long-range master plan for recreation is needed.
Recreation is big business. The recreation market last year
was |47 billion, 12 cents of every consumer dollar.
In North Carolina, travel alone accounted for $888 million
of state business, in much of which recreation purposes were the
impelling factors.
North Carolina is strategically equipped to gain vast economic
benefits from recreation and its supplementary effects in business
and industry. We have a variety of wonderful natural resources,
a hospitable and energetic people and the North Carolina Recre-
ation Commission to render experience-directed advisory assist-
ance and guidance to our recreation-economic efforts.
In recreation may be much of our hopes for a bright economic
future in North Carolina. This report points the way to state
action which can become the sound base upon which to rest our
economic as well as our societal hopes for the future. It is
through the wise use of land for living in North Carolina. As
Governor, I commend this report to the area, county and city
planning boards, and to the people of North Carolina for their
study and consideration.
584
Papers of Terry Sanford
ON HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE
March 29, 1963
I am aware of the importance of roads, highways, and city
streets. These links of commerce help everybody and they are
good investments.
I am most grateful for the members of the General Assembly
who have deep interest in the progress of our road program.
I did not make a road bond or new road taxes a part of my
program when I came into office because I felt my job was to
stop the diversions from the highway fund in order to have
more construction and maintenance money.
This we were able to do, and we have let to contract more
highway and road construction than in any similar period in
history. We have built more secondary roads than any adminis-
tration except Kerr Scott's.
By additional steps against diversion now being taken, we
should be able to continue this pace during the next two years.
Whether we should have bonds or operate on a pay-as-you-go
basis is a matter for legislative decision. I have not asked for any
additional funds because I believe we can meet the pressing
needs of the people without bonds.
I do think that we should be thinking about the future-
studying needs, trends in construction costs, in maintenance
costs, in urban requirements, and looking for ways to keep North
Carolina in front of all the states in highways and roads. I hope
the General Assembly will call for this studying and planning.
Again I thank the members of the General Assembly, espe-
cially Senator Robert F. Morgan, Senator Saunders,^^^ Repre-
sentatives Harris, Wallace, and the many others, who have
shown such a genuine interest in keeping our system the best.
Of course, we have needs now. We are meeting many of them.
So that there will be no feeling that we are not pressing as
hard as possible, let me point out six facts about our highway
system.
1. Because we have a single state system (only two or three
other states work it this way), we are able to support 10 per cent
Robert Foster Morgan (1922- ) , merchant and civic leader from Shelby;
state senator, 1953-1963. North Carolina Manual, 1963, 541.
William Preston Saunders (1897- ), retired manufacturer from Southern
Pines; mayor of Robbins, 1935-1950; state senator, 1963. North Carolina Manual,
1963, 543.
Joseph Paul Wallace (1905- ), automobile dealer and service station
owner from Troy; state senator, 1943; member of House of Representatives, 1945-
1949; 1955-1963. North Carolina Manual, 1963, 615.
Statements and Articles
585
of all state highway mileage on 3 per cent of road taxes collected
in America and with the fewest highway employees.
2. We have the best road system in America, counting totals
and percentage paved, except for New York and Ohio, and the
use is so much greater in those two states because of the heavy
population that we would rank well ahead of both of them in
mileage of highways available to each resident or motorist.
3. The great state of Texas today has fewer miles of paved
secondary roads to date than were paved in North Carolina by
Kerr Scott alone.
4. In the brief time since I have been in office, we have paved
more secondary roads than the total paved to date in Louisiana,
Maine, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, and
Rhode Island.
5. California has 28,000 miles paved to our 27,000 miles but
has almost twice as many miles unpaved as do we.
6. South Carolina has 4,372 paved secondary miles compared
to our 27,000 miles, or 16 per cent compared to our 46 per cent.
Georgia has 12,000 paved, or 18 per cent. Tennessee has 16,000
miles or 29 per cent.
During the remaining year and a half we intend to build roads
as rapidly as possible, on existing revenue, and we will be able
to keep up the pace by the legislative action in stopping diver-
sions, and the administrative action in improving efficiency.
ON THE PROPOSED BREATHOLIZER BILL
April 26, 1963
[The so-called "breatholizer" bill, supported wholeheartedly by Governor
Sanford, was enacted into law by the 1963 General Assembly. See Session
Laws, 1965, c. 966, for "An Act to Amend the General Statutes of North
Carolina to Provide for Breath Tests for Intoxication in Criminal Cases
Involving Drunken Driving."]
The breatholizer bill is simple in concept, operation, and pur-
pose.
We have always allowed a patrolman to testify in a drunken
driver case that, "I smelled whisky on his breath."
This is a highly unscientific way. It is like limiting testimony
of skid marks to evidence that it "looked like a considerable
number of feet" instead of saying, "I measured the marks with a
tape and they were precisely 32 feet and 10 inches."
586
Papers of Terry Sanford
The breatholizer bill would simply allow the officer to ''smell"
the breath of an offender in a scientific manner. It puts into use
a scientific instrument Avhich measures precisely the amount of
alcohol consumed. It tells whether it is too much imder our
laws, or not enough to constitute a crime, and thus this scientific
approach protects the individual as well as the public.
Other states have found that the use of the scientific test deters
driving while drinking, and that is what we are trying to accom-
plish.
There is no longer any mystery concerning a chemical test
for drunkenness. It is endorsed by the American Medical Asso-
ciation, American Bar Association, and the National Safety
Council.
Thirty-four states and the District of Columbia have enacted
legislation defining drinking and driving in the terms of alcoholic
content of the blood.
The implied consent feature of the breatholizer bill repeatedly
has been upheld in the courts. Opposition to the implied consent
clause overlooks the fact that the requirement of fingerprinting
long has been an established practice of American justice.
When the cry of the rights of drinking drivers goes up, we
should remember the right of law-abiding citizens to live.
The greatest advantage of such legislation is not the number
of people it would enable the courts to convict of drinking and
driving, but the great psychological deterrent it has on those
perons who are tempted to drink and drive. It also would pro-
tect the innocent and convict the guilty. It is conservatively
estimated that in 50 per cent of all accidents alcohol is prevalent
in one or more of the drivers and that one-third of all fatalities
involved drivers who had been drinking before driving.
DESIGNATING LAW DAY
April 30, 1963
North Carolina and the United States were founded on the
precept that all men are equal before the bar of justice and that
all citizens should equally enjoy the rights established by law.
That we in the state and nation have not always succeeded in
exercising that precept to perfection does not detract one iota
from the belief held by the vast majority of Americans in that
principle. On this basis of law was founded our democratic gov-
ernment in North Carolina and in the United States. On the
Statements and Articles
587
basis of law, we will make advances in economic and social and
religious life.
As a lawyer and as a public official, it seems to me particularly
fitting that Americans should pay their respect on May 1 to the
law which guarantees their rights as free men. For this is the day
when the advocates of the Communist ideology parade their
might before the eyes of the world.
When man came down out of the trees and walked out of the
jungle and first recognized the necessity for working together
for the good of the individual and the community at large, he
committed himself to a system of rules which we now refer to
as law.
Without the law, the masses of men are mobs.
Without the law, the weak are helpless.
Without the law, might makes right.
Without the law, equitably written and fairly administered,
there is chaos and there is an anarchy— an anarchy that does not
connote freedom from restrictions but an anarchy that connotes
absence of reason and of orderliness and of rights and of life
itself.
Therefore, I am happy to designate May 1, 1963, as
Law Day in North Carolina.
PROPOSAL ON BEHALF OF THE
FORGOTTEN CHILDREN
May 5, 1963
[In placing emphasis on quality education, Governor Sanford did not
overlook those children for whom special education was needed. Provision
was made for the exceptionally talented and for the mentally retarded. In
this statement, which was presented to the legislature, the Governor spoke
feelingly in behalf of the latter group and outlined requests for appropri-
ations totaling $1,822,052 for the biennium. The 1963 General Assembly
actually appropriated $1,822,652 to provide for the programs and services
requested by the Governor. Details of the appropriation are given in Session
Laws, 1963, c. 845.]
We have made great progress in North Carolina during the
past two years in quality and extent of the education available
to all our people. As countless generations of North Carolinians
climb the educational ladder which the present legislators and
their predecessors in the 1961 General Assembly have strength-
ened, lengthened, and widened, they will be able to see farther,
588
Papers of Terry Sanford
work more skillfully, and live life more fully— all because of
what the people of the state have done. The silver talents which
you have invested today will yield in the future polished talents
of a value incalculably greater than that of precious metal. More
youngsters will learn more; more adults will earn more; and
the lamps of dynamic, prosperous, and cultured communities
will burn ever more brightly.
Let us not forget, however, as we build these ladders ^or our
children's minds to climb, that there are in North Carolina today
at least 160,000 persons who cannot, because of intelligence lim-
itations alone, learn, earn, produce, and live to the same extent
as the overwhelming number of their fellow human beings of
comparable age. I speak in their behalf; they cannot come to the
legislature on their own behalf. These persons are not afflicted
by mental illness, although the frustrations produced by their
inability to communicate— brought on by our failure to educate
and train them— do often complicate their intellectual slowness
with mental illness. Chiefly, however, these are human beings
who were born with marked deficiencies of recognizable intelli-
gence—intelligence quotients of 70 or below. They are not sick;
but the patient attention which their needs require is just as
elaborate, painstaking, and expensive as if they were.
They need ladders, too; but the rungs on their ladders must
be much closer together, and must be fashioned in shapes and
materials different from the other ladders which we are building.
They need the constant, guiding hand of a teacher who has
been carefully trained to develop all that is within them.
These people need to be identified, so that they are not con-
fused with others whose afflictions do not consist of mental re-
tardation. For this task, we will need the expert services of the
psychologist, the psychiatrist, the social w^orker, the physician,
the teacher. The knowledge of all of these practitioners is ur-
gently needed if we are to succeed in attacking the baffling prob-
lems posed by a lone, retarded child. Yet we do not have even
a minimal number of these specialists trained in the problems
of retardation.
Now is the time to act. There are in North Carolina, below
the age of thirty, at least 75,000 children and adults who are re-
tarded, but who are considered either trainable or educable. To
fail to give them education and vocational training suited spe-
cifically for their needs is to condemn them to a bleak, joyless,
and unproductive existence in which their lives are but a drag
on their families, on all North Carolinians, and chiefly on them-
selves. Here, then, is the personal tragedy of human waste. Keep
Statements and Articles
589
in mind, however, that we are also talking about persons who, if
made productive through education and vocational training,
would contribute substantially to our gross state product. For
example, there were 1,578 retarded persons in the United States
in 1958 who completed training under the Vocational Rehabili-
tation program. Before rehabilitation, their annual earnings were
$70,000; after rehabilitation, their earnings were $2.5 million.
There are many things which we do not know about retarda-
tion. We need research desperately which will tell us these three
things about it:
1) What causes it and what steps might be taken to prevent
its occurrence?
2) How can we identify those afflicted with it?
3) How can we reach into the minds of retarded persons and
interest them in learning the skills for which their intellects are
suited and the general knowledge which will immeasurably en-
rich their lives?
We need to get on with the tasks before us. Without action
now, the number of retarded persons will continue to grow, as
will this profound tragedy of personal waste. If we act now,
simultaneously to provide training for personnel to work with
retarded persons, to provide education and training for the re-
tarded children and adults themselves— both within our institu-
tions, the public schools, and the community— and to support
the needed research, we will solve many of the problems created
by retardation, and we will move much closer to knowledge
about retardation itself.
To study the over-all problem of mental retardation, I ap-
pointed a Commission on Mental Retardation. This commission,
under the able chairmanship of Mr. Charles Waddell of Ashe-
ville,^^^ gave thorough and thoughtful consideration to all aspects
of retardation and reported its findings to me last fall. That re-
port has already been released to the public.
To continue studying the state-wide problem of mental retarda-
tion, and to co-ordinate the attack by all state and private organi-
zations on this problem, I am recommending the creation of an
Advisory Council on Mental Retardation. This will necessitate
expenses in the amount of $20,000 per year.
In addition, I am recommending that the General Assembly
appropriate funds this biennium for several specific programs
designed to attack the problem of mental retardation on several
fronts.
Charles E. Waddell, banker from Asheville, and member of Council on Men-
tal Retardation. Information supplied by Senator Herbert Hyde of Asheville.
590
Papers of Terry Sanford
First of all, we need a training program for teachers who will
teach the retarded children in our school program. This should
be centered at Chapel Hill but also should include all other
state colleges engaged in training teachers. This will require
1120,000 per year, but this is fundamental. This is where we
start.
To train both specialists and nonspecialists for work with the
retarded, we need to establish at Murdoch School a training pro-
gram which will assure a supply of competent personnel for our
community and institutional programs. The cost for the bien-
nium will be |155,960.
To train medical students and residents in the diagnosis and
treatment of mental retardation, we need a Center for Mental
Retardation at the Psychiatric Center in Chapel Hill. We have
such a woeful shortage. This will cost $780,000, but half of this
is available from federal funds.
To attract teachers into training for the education of the re-
tarded, I recommend the creation of a teacher scholarship pro-
gram which will cost $100,000 for the biennium. As I pointed
out above, the problems of teaching mentally retarded children
are different from those involved in teaching normal children.
Therefore, the teachers must be trained to use different tech-
niques. I am convinced that the only way to attract a sufficient
supply of trained teachers into this particular specialty is to pro-
vide for them the additional funds which the extra training will
cost.
To provide the kind of vocational training which will enable
trainable and educable retarded persons to become productive,
useful citizens, I recommend the appropriation of a sum of
$452,092 for the vocational rehabilitation program over and
above the amount already requested by the Hospitals Board of
Control. This sum, when matched with available federal funds,
will allow us to establish vocational rehabilitation programs in
all of our state institutions, will make possible the creation of
eight rehabilitation houses in the next biennium, will permit
the Department of Public Instruction to begin the establishment
of vocational rehabilitation centers in several communities and
to employ additional rehabilitation counselors for work with
retarded persons in the communities. Think what it will mean
to the many thousands of retarded human beings in North Caro-
lina to be taught to earn their livelihood.
One of the most critical aspects of the retardation problem is
the overwhelming lack of adequate facilities and personnel for
the identification and evaluation of retarded persons. In a recent
Statements and Articles
591
study of Alamance County children's handicaps, it was deter-
mined that there are roughly three times more retarded children
in that county than had been known from all public and private
agency records. I want also, at this time, to single out the Ala-
mance County project as an example of close and generous co-
operation of state, county, and city agencies, the university, the
medical society, Alamance County Hospital, physicians, and
many public-spirited citizens of Burlington, all of whom have
increased substantially what we know about the prevalence of
children's handicaps.
To help identify and evaluate retarded persons, I recommend
the appropriation to the State Board of Health of the sum of
$354,000 to establish and operate during this biennium evalua-
tion and development clinics, spaced geographically around the
state so that this kind of facility is accessible to all persons in
North Carolina wherever they may live.
To permit the employment of a curriculum specialist, to de-
velop and make available a curriculum library and special text-
books for the retarded children of North Carolina, I recommend
the appropriation to the State Board of Education of the sum
of $90,000.
I realize that these recommendations combine into a large
sum, a total of $1,822,052 for the biennium. As large as it is,
however, it does not approach the amount of money which ade-
quately trained and educated retarded persons will contribute
to the economy of North Carolina in an equivalent period of
time. And you cannot measure the heartbreak in dollars and
cents.
I am urging the General Assembly to take a giant step this
session, thereby helping many thousands to take the many tiny
steps which will enable them to join in the life of our dynamic
state of North Carolina. These are the forgotten children. Ours
is the opportunity to see that they are remembered.
ON NORTH CAROLINA'S PART IN THE SPACE AGE
May 5, 1963
[As early as December 2, 1961, the Sanford administration was thinking in
terms of North Carolina's role in the space age. On that day the Governor
announced at the Morehead Planetarium in Chapel Hill the organization of
the 39-member Scientific Advisory Committee. The committee, he explained,
would help meet the "rapid pace of scientific and technological change"
within the state, and would be "still another valuable tool in attracting new
592
Papers of Terry Sanford
industry." Largely because of the work of this nonstatutory committee, a
proposal for the establishment of a permanent Board of Science and Tech-
nology was sent to the 1963 General Assembly on May 6, 1963, and was later
adopted. It was in anticipation of the proposal to follow that Governor
Sanford addressed his remarks in this statement.]
North Carolina does not have a real part in the space age.
I suggest we move boldly to carve ourselves a significant part.
We do not have a launching site so we cannot compete in
launchings with Cape Canaveral.
We do not have the combination of adequate rail service and
water transportation sites, so we cannot compete with the valley
of the Mississippi River in the construction of the hardware of
space flight.
California has the base of a great aircraft and electronics in-
dustry which we do not. They have made fabulous investments
in higher education which in turn have attracted the scientists
and industries which now attract nearly half of the national
space funds.
Massachusetts has the MIT, Harvard, and Clark combination
in education and a sophisticated combination in industry, which
enable them to contribute mightily to the probe of space. We
have much of this too, but we are not using it fully.
There are only forty members of the Association of American
Universities, the elite of the American universities. Massachu-
setts has three members, but North Carolina has two, Duke and
Chapel Hill. State, with proposed changes, can soon become
eligible and I am convinced can qualify. Then we will be one
of four states with three or more members of the Association of
American Universities. We will have the added advantage of
having our three within a very few miles of each other.
We have another advantage that perhaps no other state has.
We have already tied these three great universities together in
a working partnership, and have demonstrated that we can work
closely together through the Research Triangle.
This is our great resource, giving us the power to do things
in the space age enjoyed by very few other states.
Our question is to find the best way of using this resource.
This is not our only resource. We also have industries already
working in space, atomic, and related sciences, capable of tre-
mendous expansion.
What kind of a program can we have that will give us in North
Carolina a leading position? A program is not just going to un-
fold before us. We cannot go to Washington and say give us
some space projects, some space industries, and even if we could
Statements and Articles
593
this would not be of much lasting value. We need to start some-
thing for ourselves, something bold and imaginative.
For two years now we have worked on many ideas, many
suggestions, many plans for finding a more prominent role for
North Carolina as the world advances into the age of space.
We have worked with the officials of the National Aeronautics
and Space Administration, other federal agencies such as the
Atomic Energy Commission, with our own university president
and chancellors, with industry leaders, with the Department of
Conservation and Development, the Research Triangle Institute,
and with the Governor's Scientific Advisory Committee. We have
invited in for discussion such outside authorities as Dr. William
Baker, chief of Bell Laboratories.
Since we cannot build the space ships, and cannot launch
them, and cannot even contribute very much to the design of
them, what can we do to make a contribution to the national
effort on the one hand and to reap the benefits for the people
of our state on the other?
We can, through our scientists at our universities, engage in
specific research projects, fitting piecemeal into the total effort
across the nation. We are doing some of this, but we need to do
more, and we need to broaden our approach.
The science of the space age cuts across the traditional aca-
demic disciplines, and chemistry, physics, biology become one,
and indeed become one with all human knowledge in meeting
the demands of space study. It is not enough that our efforts be
limited to a good project in one subject, or a brilliant inquiry
into another, but instead we must find the way to have all de-
partments, all disciplines, all scientists, all faculty members
working together to define and seek the broader goals.
And it is not enough to have such co-operation merely within
our great universities. State must help Duke, and Duke must
help Chapel Hill, and Chapel Hill must respond to both, and
the best of each must furnish the leadership for all.
Even this is not enough. If we are to know what we seek, and
if we are to make it a part of the economy, we must bring into
partnership all of the industrial potential of the state and at-
tract even more.
First then, we can achieve more broadly applied scientific
research dealing with the countless opportunities of space-atomic
technology, if we have the machinery to focus all departments
of all three universities, plus appropriate industrial resources, on
the total effort. This is one of California's secrets, and we can
do it.
594
Papers of Terry Sanford
But this is not enough, and we can do more, and we can begin
to make a unique contribution to the nation and to North Caro-
lina. In the pursuit of space secrets across the nation it is obvious
that many things will be learned which can be applied to every-
day processes and activities and needs. Things are being learned
which will help in the communications field, in the building
field, in textiles, in the chemical industry, in food processing, in
almost everything. There is probably not a single business which
will not enjoy some of the "fallout" of space technology. In fact.
Congress has specifically charged the space agency with the re-
sponsibility of seeing that such discoveries and advancements
are applied to the private sector of the economy.
This is the place we can get aboard ahead of most other states.
By tying together government agencies, universities, private in-
dustry, in research and development, oriented primarily toward
using the discoveries of space technology, although not limited
to this, we can assure much progress for our state and can make
substantial contribution to the space-atomic age.
In terms of the future position of North Carolina in industry,
commerce, and education, this achievement could be one of the
most significant steps taken in this session of the General Assem-
bly.
We have almost completed a sound and workable plan, and
along with members of the Governor's Scientific Advisory Com-
mittee, we will be ready tomorrow to present our requests to the
General Assembly and to the general public our concepts of what
can be done to move North Carolina into the space age.
FAVORING A FAIR MINUMUM WAGE
June 2, 1963
[Governor Sanford, in this statement, spoke in favor of a law to increase
the minimum wage to |1.00. An act ratified on June 11 raised the minimum
wage to 85 cents. See Session Laws, 1963, c. 816.]
I cannot and do not go along with any feeling that the mini-
mum wage will be satisfactory if raised to only 85 cents.
Senator Robert F. Morgan of Cleveland, who long has worked
for a fair minimum wage, quoted Commissioner Frank Crane
correctly. Mr. Crane simply said he was afraid it was going to be
set at 85 cents. I am not. I have confidence in the members of the
General Assembly.
Statements and Articles
595
Our minimum wage for industry and business should be $1.00.
The Senate bill is fair and reasonable. It would do much to lift
the economy of the state and it would do much to lift the indi-
vidual chance of many men and women who are trying to sup-
port their families.
We should do no less. There are plenty of people with strength
to fight the increase to |1.00. And they are fighting it. We need
also more people of strength raising their voices for the man who
does not know how and who cannot come to Raleigh to speak
for himself and his family.
Our great task in North Carolina is to quit being poor. A
decent minimum wage is one of the best ways to a better living
for everyone.
A minimum wage has never wrecked any business, as we have
heard predicted so direly for twenty-five years. A minimum wage
of $1.00 would help everybody in North Carolina.
ON THE DEATH OF POPE JOHN XXIII
June 3, 1963
I join with North Carolinians of all faiths and of all denomina-
tions, and with millions the world over, in mourning the passing
of Pope John XXIIL
It is left to future historians with the perspective of time to
evaluate his place in the record of mankind.
But we who live now know that his pleas for peace and for
human dignity and for brotherhood were a persistent and potent
influence for the welfare of man.
Therefore, men of good will will spend not so much time
mourning a transient death as they will in carrying forward the
eternal labor for humanity for which he worked so faithfully.
ON THE PROGRESS AND POTENTIALS OF
NORTH CAROLINA
June 5, 1963
Recently, I came across a familiar old speech. It was delivered
by President Teddy Roosevelt, calling his nation to greatness.
'Tar better it is," he said, "to dare mighty things, to win
596
Papers of Terry Sanford
glorious triumphs, even though checkered by failure, than to
take rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy much nor
suffer much because they live in the gray twilight that knows
neither victory nor defeat."
That is the philosophy which has moved North Carolina from
the ashes of defeat and despondency at the turn of the century to
a new day of new opportunity. Progress has always followed bold-
ness.
We are today at the point of breakthrough in North Carolina.
Never have the opportunities been so great.
Farming is not drying up; it is growing with new vitality.
New industry, home-grown and from other states, is breaking
records every day.
Residential and industrial construction is continuing to rise.
Retail sales, personal income, and jobs have never been higher.
With all of this we are well aware that all people are not shar-
ing in this new prosperity. We are also aware that unless we do
certain things, make bold new investments, carry on strength-
ened programs, then this prosperity and these opportunities will
not flow across the state to all people.
There are things to be done. We have invested much in edu-
cation. We are receiving rich dividends. But we haven't done it
all. As long as there is an inferior school, we haven't completed
our responsibility. As long as a single child is denied an educa-
tion beyond the high school for reasons of lack of funds or lack
of classroom space, then we are failing the challenge. Unless we
advance our colleges and university with advancing times, then
we do not understand our destiny.
Without new taxes, without an increase in our bonded indebt-
edness, with one of the lowest per capita tax rates in the nation,
we are for almost the first time in our history in a financial posi-
tion to invest fully in the future of our people and our state.
We have made much progress. We have much to do.
ON BIBLE READINGS AND PRAYER IN THE
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
June 18, 1963
[On June 17, 1963, the United States Supreme Court ruled, 8 to 1, in the
case of School District of Abington Township, Pennsylvania et al. v. Schempp
et al. 374 U.S. 203 (1963), that state and local regulations requiring the
recitation of the Lord's Prayer or Bible verses in the public schools were
Statements and Articles
597
unconstitutional. Governor Sanford issued a statement on the subject the
following day.]
We will go on having Bible readings and prayers in the schools
of this state just as we always have. We do not require the Bible
reading and praying, but we do these things because we want to.
As I read the decisions, this kind of thing is not forbidden by
the Constitution, and indeed, it should not be.
STATEMENT TO NEGRO LEADERS MEETING
AT THE CAPITOL
June 25, 1963
[Civil rights demonstrations became more and more frequent during the
spring of 1963. Governor Sanford invited Negro leaders to a mid-morning
session at the Capitol to discuss their differences. With Capus Waynick,
gubernatorial aide on racial matters, presiding and some 150 Negroes attend-
ing, the Governor asked the group to substitute negotiations for demon-
strations. A rejection of his plea was clearly evident in the ensuing discus-
sions, and many Negroes voiced intense dissatisfaction with the state's
handling of civil rights issues and vowed to continue the demonstration move-
ment. A gradual reduction in the number of demonstrations occurred, how-
ever, as the Governor continued to work with the Negro leadership in help-
ing solve problems relating to race.]
You are here at our invitation to find a better way to express
your hopes, desires, and aspirations. You must find a way not
only which expresses the depth and breadth of your dissatifac-
tion, but which also encourages people to assist in opening up
jobs and other opportunities.
The device of the mass demonstration has largely served its
purpose in North Carolina. It got across your message and the
urgency that had not been fully understood prior to then.
A penetrating insight came from a soldier, who happens to be
a North Carolina Negro, who wrote: "I am as much to blame
for the riots on the streets of Lexington as those who were there.
For it was I who stood aside, saying and doing nothing for many
years, and all the while some white people thought I was happy
and content when I knew it wasn't so."
The demonstrations have shown just how unhappy and dis-
contented you are, how anxious you are to remove, and remove
right now, the indignities and injustices which have been visited
upon your parents and their parents.
These demonstrations have been followed by progress for you,
598
Papers of Terry Sanford
but you would be making a mistake to assume that the demon-
strations alone, as such, brought your progress. The demonstra-
tions brought the message, and the message, in its truth and full-
ness, stirred the action which brought your progress. This may
be a subtle distinction, but it is an important distinction, and it
has great meaning for your future.
The mass demonstration awoke and jolted many people, but
this method had reached the point of diminishing returns in its
latter days, destroying good will, creating resentment, losing
friends, and not influencing people.
There are thousands of North Carolinians with both the de-
sire and the ability to start removing indignities and injustices,
so the long-range response of good will, fairness, and full job
opportunity depends on mutual respect, not intimidation.
These mass demonstrations also had reached the point where
I, as head of the executive branch of government, responsible
for law enforcement, peace and order, was required to establish
a firm policy for North Carolina. My responsibility for public
safety required that I take action before danger erupted into vio-
lence.
I do not intend to let mass demonstrations destroy us. It would
be unfortunate if I were called on to prove this. As head of the
executive branch, I am entitled to the support of all good citizens,
and I call on you to join with others in holding down strife.
I hope you will not declare war on those who urge courses of
reason at this time.
There indeed are people in the land today who say that the
white man is your enemy and war is necessary.
Not so!
Emphatically not so in North Carolina!
Your enemy and mine is a system bequeathed us by a cotton
economy, kindled by stubbornness, intolerance, hotheadedness,
north and south, exploding into war and leaving to our genera-
tions the ashes of vengence, retribution, and poverty.
The way to fight this common enemy is education, up and
down the line and across the board.
The way to fight this enemy is to open up job opportunities
for everybody, everywhere, on the basis of ability and training,
without regard to race. As a state we cannot afford to use only
part of our human resources.
The way for you to fight this enemy is through dignity, clearly
and forcefully stating your honest feelings, seeking understand-
ing and accomplishment, through good will which is at hand in
so many places. This kind of leadership and responsible example
Statements and Articles
599
by you would be applauded and widely accepted across the na-
tion.
That is why you are here. The story this morning is not the
story of mass demonstrations. The real story is not beclouded by
the story of possible violence, of the force, the danger, with
failure to establish clearer understanding.
The story this morning is the reasonable story of what you
think and why. I believe that is important.
General Capus Waynick is the representative of the Gover-
nor's Office. If this forum is of advantage, then we can hold
others in other cities, as an alternative to potentially dangerous
and generally misunderstood mass demonstrations. I am sure
that North Carolina mayors and other leaders will co-operate
fully. I am sure that they are willing to discuss all things with
you and assist you in many ways.
Now is the time for men and women of good faith to put
North Carolina above the distressing clamor of racial conflict.
Now is the time for reason to prevail.
ON THE NEED FOR A SPECIAL SESSION OF THE
GENERAL ASSEMBLY
June 26, 1963
[Because the 1963 General Assembly failed to provide for redistricting,
a special session of the legislature was called. The General Assembly, meet-
ing October 14 to 17, ratified an act establishing senatorial districts and
apportioning members on the last day of the special session. Another bill, to
change the number of legislators and pattern the North Carolina General
Assembly after the federal Congress, required ratification by the people as
the Constitution would have had to be amended. This proposal, the "little
federal plan," was defeated in a state-wide referendum held on January 14,
1964. See also statement of October 23, 1963, page 606.]
A special session of the General Assembly will be necessary.
Unfortunately, redistricting was put off until too late in the
session, and then the complexity of it made a solution impossible.
It is true that most of the members were primarily occupied
until late in the session with other important subjects, including
higher education, utilities, and highway safety. In retrospect it
is easy to say that a bill should have been brought to the Senate
floor earlier, but be that as it may, it is going to be necessary
that the job be done.
600
Papers of Terry Sanford
I will withhold decision on the exact date. In the meantime,
I will appoint a special committee to study the problem and
prepare recommended legislation.
STATEMENT AT MEETING OF NORTH CAROLINA
GOOD NEIGHBOR COUNCIL
July 3, 1963
We are just going to have to open up jobs for all people on
the basis of ability and training and promotions on the basis of
performance.
I believe this should be done, can be done, and will be done
by North Carolina people because it is right morally and because
economically we cannot afford to do otherwise.
I do not intend to try to force anybody. I do not believe in
force. I do believe the conscience of North Carolinians will get
this done.
The industrial education centers, training people in new
skills, have the policy that there must be no racial discrimination
in admissions to courses. We cannot have it any other way. These
schools are supported by state, local, and federal funds and they
are open to anyone who can qualify. We have had some sugges-
tions that this policy is not being followed in all the centers. I
have no evidence of this. In any event, we invite anyone to report
any violations of this policy to D. S. Coltrane, chairman of the
Good Neighbor Council.
There will not be any discrimination in state jobs. Such dis-
crimination is both unconstitutional and undemocratic. Negroes
are invited to apply, just as all other citizens, to Walter Fuller,
State Personnel Officer, and their applications will be judged
solely on merit and ability.
I hope private employers will continue to examine their em-
ployment policies, and will join with other citizens of good will
in wiping away the last remnants of economic discrimination. In
North Carolina we will do this, not in token degree because it
is forced by law, but in full and fair degree because it is the
proper and decent thing to do. I am pleased with the initial
voluntary reaction of North Carolina employers, and I am sure
we will soon see the general end of policies which deny full
economic opportunity to citizens who have the training and
ability to do the job.
Statements and Articles
601
I also urge all leaders of the Negro communities to get across
the message that jobs are being opened up and that it is impor-
tant, yes urgent, that young people take advantage of all training
to earn the qualifications which will fit them for these jobs. This
advice, of course, applies to all youth.
ON THE FOUNDING OF THE NORTH CAROLINA FUND
July 18. 1963
I have joined today with three other citizens to found the
organization which will administer the Ford Foundation money
we expect to get and the money from state foundations which
might come in, too.
The name of the new organization is the North Carolina Fund.
It is a nongovernment corporation, and it will have offices in
Durham. Its purpose is to find new and better ways to improve
education, economic opportunities, living environment, and gen-
eral welfare of the people.
Four of us signed the incorporation papers: Charles H. Bab-
cock of Winston-Salem, John H. Wheeler^*^ of Durham, C. A.
McKnight of Charlotte.
I am inviting twelve other citizens to serve with me on the
Board of Directors. [This paragraph ended with a list of mem-
bers of the board. See page 745 for appointments to this board.]
Twenty or more rural and urban communities will be selected
for special help by the organization. These communities will
develop their own comprehensive programs for making improve-
ments, using schools, welfare, public health, and other agencies.
The corporation also will support programs of state-wide in-
terest. Initially, emphasis is likely to be placed on a program to
improve the teaching of reading, writing, and arithmetic in the
Charles Henry Babcock (1899- ), stockbroker from Winston-Salem; Director
of R. J. Reynolds Company, Security Life and Trust Company, and President of
Mary Reynolds Babcock Foundation. Who's Who in America, XXXIII, 85.
""John Hervey Wheeler (1908- ), lawyer, banker, Negro civic leader from
Durham; Director of Mechanics and Farmers Bank; participant in U.S. South
Africa Leader Exchange Program. Albert Nelson Marquis and Others (eds.) ,
Who's Who in the South and Southwest: A Biographical Dictionary of Note-
worthy Men and Women of the South and Southwestern States (Chicago, Illinois:
A. N. Marquis Company, 1963) , VIII. 897.
Colbert Augustus McKnight (1916- ) , editor of the Charlotte Observer;
civic and educational leader in North Carolina. Who's Who in America, XXXIII.
1350.
602
Papers of Terry Sanford
first three grades of over 100 of our schools and a new method
of introducing vocational education into high schools.
This new method requires the use of a team of four teachers,
one from math, one from science, one from English, and one
shop teacher. The four will work together in order to offer a
group of students academic-vocational, pre-technician's training.
We have some teachers coming in for this project next week.
There is no telling how much money the fund will receive
over the next four years, but we feel confident that we will have
about 1 10 million in foundation money, some of it national and
some of it state, and we expect most of it to be in hand by the
first frost. We will get other money from Washington and else-
where, as the need arises, and we expect the local communities
to help pay.
The first meeting of the Board of Directors will be here in
Raleigh in my office next Friday.
URGING STUDENTS BACK TO SCHOOL
(For Radio Station WKIX Back-to-School Program)
August 15, 1963
During the summer months some of you high school students
have been working and earning your own money. Now you are
faced with a hard decision: Should you go back to school or
should you continue on your summer-time jobs?
The pay checks you have been getting every ^veek seem large,
and school may seem like hard work without pay. But the truth
of the matter is that you will make more money in school this
fall than anywhere else. Without a high school diploma, you
soon will find yourselves on dead-end streets. Without at least
high school diplomas, you will have trouble finding work, espe-
cially work with a future.
The state of North Carolina— through the quality education
program in the public schools, the industrial education centers,
the community colleges, and the state-supported senior colleges
and university— has provided you with educational opportunities
which your fathers and mothers never had.
I hope you will return to school and take full advantage of
these opportunities. By returning to school you can help assure
your own future. And you will help assure the future of our
state and nation, because that future depends as much on what
Statements and Articles
cm
happens in the classrooms as it does on wliat happens on the
launching pads at Cape Canaveral.
It's smart to go back to sc hool— and it pays. I hope you will.
ON FUND APPROVED FOR AD\ ANCE PURCHASE
OF RICH! OF- WAY
October 3, 1963
In approving a revolving fund for advance purchase of right-
of-way today the Highway Commission took a very forward-
looking action.
This has been an objective of my administration and has been
under study and development by my office, the Department of
Administration, and the Highway Department for some time.
The state can look toward the saving of many millions of
dollars by getting the needed land before buildings are on it.
It should save property owners trouble and money, too.
Very few other states have this kind of program. For North
Carolina it is a logical development from the joint State-Cities
Thoroughfare Planning Law of 1959. This state fund will in
effect be a major state aid program for cities, because they share
in right-of-way costs.
This fund will also allow us to get space for widening many
two-lane highways to four. Without it we might have to relocate
them in the future at much greater expense.
ON THE ELSIE WEBB CONTROVERSY
October 12, 1963
[James Elsie Webb, appointed highway commissioner at the beginning of
the Sanford administration, completed his four-year term in spite of this
1963 controversy which precipitated repeated demands for his resignation.
The dispute, centering in Commissioner Webb's home county of Richmond,
involved generally the relocation of U.S. Highway 220 near Rockingham and
specifically Webb's possible personal interests in the project. The relocation
had been the subject of a long-standing controversy in the county, but it was
not until two months prior to this statement that a conflict of interest was
publicly suggested. After investigations by the Bureau of Public Roads, the
SBI, and the Justice Department had produced no evidence of legal violation
on the part of Mr. Webb, the A'eius and Observer insisted that there still
remained some question of "legal ethics" and "abuse of public position."
604
Papers of Terry Sanford
It was to erase this "cloud of doubt" over the head of the highway commis-
sioner that Governor Sanford issued this Saturday statement. To placate
newsmen who had asked for release of the SBI report on the matter, a
summary of the report was granted at this time. Subsequently, after ad-
ditional investigation, the Highway Commission of the Moore adminis-
tration approved the same relocation route.]
The News and Observer suggested today editorially that the
failure to release the investigative report pertaining to the re-
location of Highway 220 in Richmond County left some doubt
hanging over the head of Commissioner Webb.
Mr. Elsie Webb is a respected citizen. He has performed many
civic services for his community. He has an excellent reputation.
I do not want to see a cloud remain over his name and reputa-
tion.
It is difficult enough to get good men to serve in voluntary
public offices without subjecting them to unfair charges.
I was advised some months ago that the report by the Bureau
of Public Roads is a matter of public record so I assume I can
release the exact wording of the three charges. These are the
charges investigated by the State Bureau of Investigation. They
are best reported in a letter from this office to the Secretary of
Commerce [Luther Hodges], appropriate parts of which follow:
I have received from Mr. D. Grant Mickle, Acting Director, Bureau ,of
Public Roads, a letter setting out charges against J. Elsie Webb, a member
of our State Highway Commission. In addition, Mr. [W. F.] Babcock
has carefully and at considerable length gone over the entire file with your
Mr. Redwine. In addition, I have just examined thoroughly the entire file.
In addition, I have been looking into Mr. Webb's conduct in relation
to the relocation of Highway 220 since I was first made aware of the
anonymous letter from Rockingham to Senator John J. Williams of Delaware
in which improper conduct on the part of Mr. Webb was charged.
Let me state, as a matter of policy, that we will not tolerate any degree of
malfeasance, and intend to take appropriate administrative and legal action
whenever we discover such action.
At the same time we will not take any action out of fear that some Con-
gressional committee might make some unjustified charge, thereby placing
us in a position of embarrassment. Mr. Webb's reputation is very good across
the State and in his own home community, except possibly with his political
opponents. I cannot and will not injure that reputation on mere suspicion. If
that unjustified embarrassment comes, I will face it and absorb it before
I will destroy a man's lifetime community standing.
The charges made in Mr. Mickle's letter are mere suspicions, and unsub-
stantiated although your best investigators have spent countless hours on
this case.
The first charge did raise some question in my mind about the legal ethics
of the transaction, although this has nothing directly to do with improper
conduct for gain as a Highway Commissioner.
"(1) Commissioner Webb acquired property within the limits of a
proposed improvement on a highway location, which was known to him
Statements and Articles
605
in his official capacity, several months before the information concerning
this proposed improvement was announced to the public."
" (2) Commissioner Webb, acting as attorney for the property owners
in the sale of the above-mentioned property, did not disclose to the
owners that the purchaser was acting at Webb's direction and as agent
for him. In addition, these property owners did not know at the time
of the sale of their property to Commissioner Webb through his agent,
that the highway through this property was to be improved."
The evidence in the file, however, mitigates the cloud of unethical conduct
as a lawyer. It is his story that he intended to buy it for his brother, who was
not available, and that later his brother wanted him to take part of it.
This is his story, the option was drawn to the brother, and the lack of guile
in asking the grantors to execute a deed to him and the placing the deed
on the public record substantiates this.
The fact that he already owned considerable land and highway frontage
in that very vicinity, and that he informed the Highway Commission that he
wanted no damages for the widening and relocation of the highway where it
ran through his property, further negates any charge of desire for improper
personal gain through the acquisition of the McNeill property.
Affidavits from Mr. Marshall and Mr. C. B. Deane^^s recently forwarded to
the Bureau of Public Roads indicate clearly that Mr. McNeill was aware of
the fact that US 220 was to be widened before the sale of the property took
place. I enclose copies.
The next charge supplies no proof.
" (3) Our investigation shows that Sheriff Goodmani43 is associated
as a business partner in the operation of a real estate venture with Com-
missioner Webb; that on or about September 8, 1961, Sheriff Goodman
purchased property known as Shaw Woods; that thereafter Commissioner
Webb in his official capacity as highway commissioner participated in
the determination to relocate Highway Route 220 through the Shaw
Woods property."
This allegation indicates that Commissioner Webb participated in the
determination to relocate US 220 through the Shaw Woods property. It
leaves the impression that Commissioner Webb used his influence to put the
highway through Shaw Woods. This is incorrect and is not borne out by the
testimony.
The testimony shows in many places that Commissioner Webb requested
the Highway Department to study alternate locations with a view towards
finding a line that would tie into US 1 north of the motels and businesses
so that they would not be bypassed. These preliminary plans and cost
estimates have been made available to the Bureau of Public Roads.
In addition, Bureau and State engineers analyzed these lines on the ground
and found that they were not practical. The matter was discussed fully in an
Advance Planning report and at a meeting of the Planning Board made up
of State and Bureau engineers. It was the determination of these engineers
that such a line was not feasible and therefore the only alternate line was to
bypass the motels. The decision that the motels must be bypassed moved the
line so that it touched the edge of Shaw Woods.
^"Charles Bennett Deane, lawyer and civic leader from Rockingham, member
of Congress, 1947-1957, Powell, North Carolina Lives, 353-354.
Raymond W. Goodman, sheriff of Richmond County, close friend and poli-
tical ally of Elsie Webb. North Carolina Manual, 1963, 692; News and Observer,
August 11, 1963.
606
Papers of Terry Sanford
In my judgment Commissioner Webb was acting properly in his capacity
because of the requests of Town officials and businessmen that every effort
be made to construct the project so that it would not bypass the motels and
business area south of the city.
I would suggest, indeed insist, that the route of relocation of Route 220
be re-studied. If the Bureau and State engineers were improperly influenced,
then the first step should be to correct this.
In addition to the request made in this letter for a restudy of
the location, I turned all of the material given to me over to the
State Bureau of Investigation, with the request (request and not
direction because the SBI does not operate under the Governor's
Office) that they thoroughly investigate the matter. The Attorney
General also reviewed this file and the report.
A summary of the SBI report (227 pages plus exhibits) is at-
tached.
The conclusion of this report is "(17) That the investigation
made did not establish that Commissioner J. Elsie Webb influ-
enced the locating of the proposed route through property owned
by him or through property owned by Sheriff Ray Goodman."
ON THE REDISTRICTING OF THE STATE SENATE
October 23, 1963
I congratulate the General Assembly on meeting the constitu-
tional duty of redistricting now. The 1965 senate will be as com-
pletely representative as we can make it, and I am gratified that
the action was concluded in only four days. The members did
what they were called into session to do, and they did indeed
do it with dispatch.
So many governors have had so much trouble with this issue
of redistricting, but getting it done in a proper manner in North
Carolina has been relatively easy.
I had obligations which required me to leave Raleigh before
the session was concluded, so I take this opportunity to express
publicly my deep appreciation.
The fact that a constitutional amendment is to be submitted
to the people should not detract from the outstanding accom-
plishment of redistricting now, according to population, and
according to our Constitution. I shall have some comment about
the amendment within the next several days.
Statements and Articles
607
ON DRIVER TRAINING REQUIREMENT FOR YOUTH
November 4, 1963
[By action of the 1963 General Assembly compulsory driver training was
initiated for minors between the ages of sixteen and eighteen. See G.S. 20-11;
S.L., 1963, c. 968, ss. 2, 2A.]
We are making some progress in traffic safety but not nearly
enough.
I foresee the day when all new drivers will take courses in safe
driving before being licensed. I also would predict that sooner
or later all people who violate traffic laws would be required to
take some kind of refresher course.
Driver mistakes and faults cause too many accidents, and most
of these could be corrected by better training.
The driver training now required for new drivers in the
younger ages is a step in the right direction.
We wouldn't undertake to fly an airplane, or operate a piece
of industrial machinery, or do anything else as dangerous as
driving without some training.
I think this new training program is going to do much good,
and every parent should be able to breathe a little easier. Every
young driver will be a little better protected. And I am sure
this program of training will be improved year by year.
I hope the young people will accept it in the spirit in which it
is offered, and I am sure they will. Here is a chance to learn
how to drive for greater enjoyment and with greater safety.
REACTION TO THE ASSASSINATION OF
PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY
November 22, 1963
The tragedy of the assassination of the President is overwhelm-
ing.
ON THE DEATH OF
PRESIDENT JOHN FITZGERALD KENNEDY
November 23, 1963
North Carolinians mourn the death of John Fitzgerald Ken-
nedy, President of the United States of America, and mourn the
tragic and disgraceful cause.
608
Papers of Terry Sanford
This wholesome, courageous, warmhearted leader of the free
people of the world spent most of his life, in uniform and out, in
bold and intelligent attack on tyranny, bigotry, and oppression.
With a passionate concern for all people, often harassed from
both sides and from behind, President Kennedy set his strength
determinedly for human understanding and world peace, re-
maining always resolute in his faith, always undaunted and un-
afraid.
The valiant soldier of freedom is dead.
All mankind is less. ^
IMPRESSIONS RECEIVED DURING FIRST CONFERENCE
WITH PRESIDENT JOHNSON
November 26, 1963
Last night I had the opportunity to meet with the new Presi-
dent of the United States, Lyndon B. Johnson. I was in the
company of thirty-six other governors, of both parties, from
Maine to Alaska to Hawaii.
Yesterday was a long and hard day for the President. He had
invited the governors to stay over to meet with him at eight
o'clock. As we left the hotel room, we were watching the tele-
vision report of his greeting the heads of states and representa-
tives of some eighty countries.
He came to our meeting thirty minutes late. He had been
talking at great length to French President Charles de Gaulle
and Canadian Prime Minister Lester B. Pearson and was delayed
for extremely good reasons. He couldn't possibly have had time
to eat supper.
I was impressed by a number of things.
First, he is working extremely hard.
Second, he has the capacity to take over. He has been in the
middle of the Kennedy administration and has been in a position
to keep well informed on everything. His background is one of
the broadest possible experience. He already knows most of the
heads of state. No Vice-President has ever been better prepared.
I was impressed again with what I have known a long time.
He has a generous heart and a deep compassion for people, all
people, especially those who need his help and concern.
I was impressed with his sincerity, his desire to measure up to
the great traditions of the office. At the same time he is essentially
Statements and Articles
609
a humble man. This was best expressed in his call for help from
all governors, all congressmen, all people. He was talking about
every single one of us in North Carolina.
He will continue to work for the programs now pending in
Congress, which he helped to shape. At the top of the list he put
education, civil rights, and tax reduction.
We must have the tax reduction to spur the economy to great-
er growth, he said. This is the only way to balance the budget
and reduce the debt. This is the only sound long-range approach,
he said. This makes a lot of sense, and he said he needed the
understanding of everybody in North Carolina.
Civil rights is high on his list, he said, because the greatest
democracy in the world cannot afford to have people held down,
"be they Orientals in California, Mexicans in the Southwest, Ne-
groes in Mississippi, or Johnsons in Johnson City, Texas." The
President of a free people cannot condone second-class citizen-
ship.
Education needs the support of the bills now pending, and
more too. He has the same kind of faith in education the people
of North Carolina have.
He told the governors. Democratic and Republican, that he
needed right now the strength of every citizen. We must show
the world democracy can remain strong in spite of the tragedy
of last week. We have suffered a loss beyond words, he told us,
and we need to join together in greater unity, ridding ourselves
of fear and hatred and false accusations.
"There will be plenty of time for politics after the two national
conventions," he told this group from both parties. "Until then,
let's work together to show how strong and vital America can be."
He was talking to the citizens of North Carolina through me,
and he said he needs the help of every one of you.
He made a tremendous impression on the governors. I believe
he will make the same impression on the people.
ON NATURAL RESOURCES OF THE STATE
December 13, 1963
North Carolina has been blessed by an abundance of natural
resources.
Our land is rich.
Our rainfall rate is excellent. •
Our climate is mild.
610
Papers of Terry Sanford
The varieties of our topography are beautifully diverse, so
much so that North Carolina is truly called "Variety Vacation-
land."
But the greatest natural resource of North Carolina is the
people. North Carolinians have proved repeatedly that they are
capable of doing anything they set out to do. Through the edu-
cation programs the state now has under way for the boys and
girls, we plan to achieve much more with the other natural
resources with which we have been endowed.
ON HIS ROLE IN THE PRIMARY CAMPAIGN
January 26, 1964
I notice the candidates are calling names, including mine. I
suppose this is natural, but I have something to say about it.
I have at least eighty-eight different irons in the fire, programs
and projects and things ranging from special schools for drop-
outs to seafood research, to highway safety, to tobacco research,
to inventorying ground water resources, to medical aid for older
people, to the development of a phosphate industry, to meet-
ing delegations from other countries, to widening Highway 17,
to school visits, to mountain roads for development, to physical
fitness programs, to finding loan funds for college students, to the
regulation of the possum season, to entertaining industrial pros-
pects, to bridges over the Roanoke, to reviewing requests for
commutations and pardons, to arranging for a forty-hour week
for employees, to advertising for tourists, to demonstrations, to
development of historic sites, to court reform, to Good Neighbor
efforts, to an Appalachian program, to employment of the handi-
capped, to the reduction of air pollution, to working for com-
munity development, to declaring special weeks and days, to ex-
tending the use of probation, to the improvement of teacher
education, to deciding on more than eighty speaking invitations
each week, to prison psychiatric treatment, to reforestation, to
attracting science-based business, to a Southport ferry, to dedica-
tions, to rural telephones, to high dams and medium bridges, to
reducing expenses, to civil defense preparations, to community
college boards, to helping private colleges, to getting from Arapa-
hoe to Cherry Point, to education in prisons, to planning for
Piedmont Crescent growth, to naming members to several hun-
dred commissions, to increasing exports of farm products, to
Heritage Square and Capitol planning, to alcoholic rehabilita-
Statements and Articles
611
tion, to helping with sixth grade arithmetic, to answering 300
letters a day, to seeing people with problems, to presiding over
the university trustees, to the surplus food program, to the pro-
tection of our textile industry, to worrying about N. C. Symphony
funds, to remedial reading programs, to stopping dropouts, to
obtaining foundation funds for special projects, to encouraging
National Guard and reserve enlistments, to attracting qualified
people to state employment, to maintaining equitable freight
rates, to working with farm organizations, to studying library
resources, to working for accelerated public works grants, to
improving the status of women, to providing technical assistance
for industry, to the preservation of the Outer Banks, to utiliza-
tion of mineral resources, to cleaning up our rivers and streams,
to expediting interstate highway construction, to choosing a band
for the World's Fair, to flood control, to expanding opportuni-
ties for the retarded child, to honoring outstanding high school
students, to promoting the Coastal Historyland Trail, to build-
ing secondary roads, to adult illiteracy, to the administration of
welfare funds, to development of our ports, to understanding the
causes of poverty, to recreation programs, to children with speech
and hearing defects, to promoting the Research Triangle, to ex-
pansion of facilities for the mentally ill, to development of ade-
quate industrial education, to extending educational television,
to securing the Environmental Health Center, to explaining to
dozens and dozens why I left their special interests, and mine, off
of this list.
If the candidates will let me attend to these duties, I will
gladly leave the campaigning to them.
ON ESTABLISHING THE LEARNING INSTITUTE OF
NORTH CAROLINA
February 2, 1964
I have today joined with five fellow citizens in founding the
Learning Institute of North Carolina.
LINC is a research and development center unlike any now
existing in our country, combining the chief educational forces
of a whole state in an effort to find ways to improve learning.
I was joined in this move by Dallas Herring, Chairman of the
Board of Education, and Charles F. Carroll, State Superintend-
ent of Public Instruction, who represent the public schools. I
612
Papers of Terry Sanford
was joined by Bill Friday, President of the University of North
Carolina, and Douglas Knight, the President of Duke University,
who represent the university forces of our state. I was joined by
Bill Archie, the Director of the Board of Higher Education, who
represents the public colleges and teacher training centers of
our state.
I signed the charter of LINC as Chairman of the North Caro-
lina Fund.
LINC ought to delve into the very center of the problems of
learning, to try to find out why some children do well and some
don't live up to their potentials. For a long time we've main-
tained that the children who don't learn are at fault, but we
ought to stop blaming such important matters on children and
look to ourselves and our own systems for some of the blame.
This might mean new teaching methods, new approaches, and
almost certainly it is going to put the spotlight on community
faults outside the schools themselves.
LINC will have a few demonstration projects, such as the
North Carolina Advancement School, which we announced ear-
lier when we received a $500,000 grant from Carnegie.
I am able to announce today, also, a grant from the federal
government of about $80,000 to make it possible for LINC to
hold a series of conferences involving top educators to help plan
the Advancement School and LINC.
The staff for LINC has not been chosen. John Ehle of my
staff will continue to co-ordinate this and the related projects.
Among educators from out of state who are going to help us are
Nicholas Hobbs of the Peabody Institute, Fred Jackson of the
Carnegie Foundation, John Ivey of Michigan State, Paul Ylvisa-
ker of the Ford Foundation, Francis lanni and Edward Brice
of the Office of Education in Washington, C. Ray Carpenter of
Penn State, and Winfred Godwin of the Southern Regional Edu-
cation Board. They will join educators from our public school
system, from our universities, and from the colleges and will help
us focus attention, devise action, seek improvement for the bene-
fit of our children. These conferences will get under way in
February.
I consider LINC to be a major development of our state. It is
the result of many months of work, and now there are more
months of work ahead.
There will be twelve directors for LINC. Duke University will
appoint two, of whom one is to be the President; the University
of North Carolina will appoint two, of whom one is to be the
President; the Board of Education will appoint four, one of
Statements and Articles
613
them to be the Chairman and another to be the Superintendent
of Public Instruction; the Board of Higher Education will ap-
point two, one of whom is to be the Director; the North Caro-
lina Fund will appoint two, one of whom is to be the Chairman.
It is expected that these agencies will give financial support to
LINC from their research budgets.
ON THE VOCATIONAL EDUCATION PROGRAM
February 12, 1964
Automation in the factories and mechanization on the farms
is greatly accelerating the importance of vocational education in
North Carolina.
Since brain power has replaced back power as the number-one
need in our economy, the vocational education program of North
Carolina is vital to the state as a whole and to thousands of indi-
vidual citizens.
ON THE RESEARCH TRIANGLE
(Statement Made for the Associated Press)
February 12, 1964
The Research Triangle is an excellent example of the inter-
dependence of industry and education in North Carolina. In-
cluding within its boundaries Duke University at Durham, the
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and the University
at Raleigh, the Research Triangle is designed to utilize to the
fullest possible extent for industry, commerce, and government,
the brain power of those three outstanding institutions.
The businessmen of North Carolina have contributed millions
of dollars for the development of the Research Triangle Park
on which great new laboratories for science and technology are
being built.
The Research Triangle of North Carolina is a striking exam-
ple of the fact that North Carolina, which was late in getting in
on the industrial revolution, will play an increasingly important
role in the atomic revolution and the space age.
The presence of the Research Triangle has served as a strong
magnet in our campaign for new industry. Some companies are
614
Papers of Terry Sanford
attracted by it because they wish to establish a laboratory there.
Other companies plan to have the Research Triangle Institute
do contract work. All new companies are impressed with the
Research Triangle's potential for the future.
ON THE NEW WESTERN RESIDENCE
FOR THE GOVERNOR
March 9, 1964
[The Governor's summer home, a gift of the Asheville Chamber of Com-
merce, is an eight-room rock and frame house situated high on Patton
Mountain overlooking Asheville and the Blue Ridge Mountains. The state,
in accepting the residence, agreed to maintain and staff it.]
I think having a residence for the Governor in western North
Carolina is a wonderful accomplishment, and I am most grateful
to the Asheville Chamber of Commerce for its initiative in mak-
ing this gift possible. Although I have traveled into the western
counties many times, I have not been there as much as I would
have liked. I hope this will have the effect of linking the west-
ern part of the state more closely with the rest of the state.
More than two years ago the Department of Conservation and
Development and I started looking for some place which could
serve as a headquarters in the west for the governor. We need
this so that people with ideas and needs can communicate more
closely with the Governor's Office and state government.
I will be at this residence within the next few weeks. I invite
the citizens of the western counties to come by, sign the guest
book, have a cup of coffee, and tell me anything that might be
on their minds. I also will schedule ten more official visits dur-
ing the balance of this year and we will give adequate advance
notice of the dates.
ON THE PRESIDENT'S ANTI-POVERTY PROGRAM
March 18, 1964
I like the President's message on poverty, and North Carolina
is ready to march with him in this war on an enemy which has
destroyed the spirit of so many of our citizens.
President Johnson's new program is designed to remove the
Statements and Articles
615
barriers to the exits from poverty. The objective is for us to
remove the causes of poverty, rather than continuing to carry
the burden of the people of poverty.
It gives hope to the hopeless.
First, there is education. The country will be given a new
kind of school opportunity. These will be job training centers,
residence schools where young people who haven't finished
school can get education, training, and skills. North Carolina
already has the facilities available, and we can move into oper-
ation today.
Also proposed is a work-training program, education along
with part-time work, not in a residence school. The North Caro-
lina Fund can administer this program through local communi-
ties, some of which already have submitted such proposals. This
kind of productive part-time work would keep the young in our
schools or industrial education centers, where they might get the
education they will need.
In addition, there will be a self-help program for college stu-
dents, which will enable colleges to provide jobs for students
without adequate finances.
A second major proposal is community action.
Plans by communities willing to put their own money and
effort to work on breaking the cycle of poverty will be given help.
Fortunately, we have a reservoir of such community action
plans, fifty-one covering sixty-six counties, submitted to the
North Carolina Fund the first week in February.
These are fresh and ready to go. Communities might well get
in touch with the North Carolina Fund and get guidance on
how to go about working up such an action program.
Third is the program of volunteers: the domestic Peace Corps
to serve in the disadvantaged places of America. President John-
son said: "If the states request them, if the community needs
and will use them" they will be provided. North Carolina will
be ready to know how to use these volunteers effectively, because
we have a program going. The North Carolina Volunteers, col-
lege students working under the North Carolina Fund during
the summer, is a prototype of the national program, and we will
gain some valuable advance experience.
In operation already are many other programs, private and
public, designed to help those trapped in the prison of poverty.
Using these existing programs will be a part of any good com-
munity action program.
I agree with President Johnson that "for the first time in our
history, it is possible to conquer poverty."
616
Papers of Terry Sanford
I also agree with him that as "we broaden the base of abun-
dance, giving more people the chance to produce and consume,
we create new industry, higher production, increased earnings
and better income for all."
And I am also grateful that Lyndon B. Johnson is the kind of
President who has a deep compassion for the least of his fellow
citizens.
DESIGNATING SPECIAL TIME FOR THE AGING
IN NORTH CAROLINA
April 17, 1964
One citizen out of every fourteen in North Carolina is sixty-
five years of age or older. All of the rest of us will eventually
reach that age if we are lucky and if we watch what we eat,
where we drive, and our step.
For some, the age of sixty-five means a release from the duties
that have bound them since their school days. It means fishing
and hunting in the middle of the week. It means time to read
the books for which there was no time in the hurried earlier
years. It means an end to shrill alarms in the morning. It means
naps in the middle of the day.
For many who are sixty-five and older, it means a time to do
a lot of work of the kind that is preferred.
For most it is freedom from the need to rush, to challenge, to
prove.
North Carolina is a greater state because of the achievements
compiled by the 323,000 citizens of our state who are sixty-five
or more. Those of use who have not yet attained that period of
life can continually profit from the experience, the knowledge,
and the wisdom of these senior citizens.
In return for the benefits we constantly enjoy from the past
and present work of these senior citizens, it is incumbent upon
the rest of us to assist them. To do so, we have the Governor's
Co-ordinating Committee on Aging. Increasing efforts need to
be made by governmental, religious, civic, business, and other
organizations to help provide suitable housing, economic solven-
cy, medical care, social services, and recreation.
In co-operation with the Governor's Coordinating Committee
on Aging, all North Carolinians should recognize our deep debt
to senior citizens and our responsibilities to their health, happi-
ness, and welfare.
Statements and Articles 617
Therefore, I am happy to designate the week of May 3-9, 1964,
as the
Special Time for the Aging in North Carolina.
ON COMMUNITY PROJECTS TO BE SUPPORTED BY
FEDERAL GRANT
April 20, 1964
With the approval of the State Board of Public Welfare and
in co-operation with the Director of the North Carolina Fund,
the Commissioner of Public Welfare has filed a request with the
Welfare Administration of the United States Department of
Health, Education, and Welfare for necessary funds to carry out
a demonstration project in the co-ordination of community serv-
ices. We have just been notified today that this request, which
involves a federal grant of over $400,000, has been approved.
Under this plan for a demonstration project, it is proposed to
employ twenty-five community services consultants to be as-
signed to work with the planning committees in the communities
which have submitted project proposals to the North Carolina
Fund. These will be the community projects that have not been
selected for the North Carolina Fund grants but where there is
a keen interest in the community in continuing the projects
which were submitted to the Fund. A great deal has been accom-
plished already in the process of examining the problems faced
by the people in these communities, and it is this interest and
momentum which we wish to support in this demonstration
project.
By furnishing a staff person to the community committees we
hope to broaden the base of co-operation between all agencies
and organizations, private and public, in order that existing
resources, or those which can be developed, will be used more
effectively.
This will be an all-out effort in these communities chosen to
help the people help themselves through the plans which they
have developed. This plan in itself does not provide solutions to
community problems, but it is anticipated that through such
co-ordination of efforts solutions can be found which will assist
in all-out efforts to "break the cycle of poverty." If one solution
to a problem in the community rests in securing training and
employment opportunities for the unemployed, then this staff
§18
Papers of Terry Sanford
person would help the community to mobilize the necessary
resources to make the plan effective. This involves a close work-
ing relationship with the representatives of the Employment
Security Commission, the State Board of Education, the Depart-
ment of Public Instruction, the Labor Department, the Depart-
ment of Public Welfare, and other state and local agencies. It
will be the responsibility of the community services consultant
to work not for the welfare department, but with this total group
in an effort to co-ordinate the work of all agencies in a compre-
hensive community movement to help solve the problems with
which the community is confronted. Funds are available for
many smaller but valuable demonstration projects to show what
can be done to develop and utilize community resources to meet
specific problems. If the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964
becomes a reality, it is anticipated that the community services
consultants will work with community committees in the devel-
opment of projects to create opportunities for employment and
training for eligible young people.
This is not a project through which any one agency is to at-
tempt to run a comprehensive community services project but
rather to promote the co-operation of all agencies in their efforts
to help solve the problem of poverty. In other words, it is hoped
that this will result in a single purpose approach with the sup-
port and co-operation of all the agencies concerned. It is antici-
pated that through this demonstration project the communities
involved will receive the same sort of help that the communities
selected by the North Carolina Fund will receive through the
funds provided by the North Carolina Fund.
ANNOUNCING THE LOCATION OF THE STATE
SCHOOL OF THE PERFORMING ARTS
April 30, 1964
The Advisory Board of the State's Arts School has spent these
past days with hundreds of citizens, representing Winston-Salem,
Greensboro, Hillsborough, Durham, and Raleigh.
They have been seeking two things: adequate quarters for the
school, and the continued support of the school.
Never before has the state undertaken such an assessment of
its cultural resources. Actually, never has any state done so.
The board which made our study is composed of professional
artists representing many years of experience. Not only are they
Statements and Articles
619
artists, but most of them are teachers as well. Last night I met
with them and heard from them their report, and in their report
were many fine tributes to North Carolina.
They unanimously recommended to the board of trustees and
to me that the new school be placed in Winston-Salem.
The Winston-Salem offer consists of the Gray High School,
which now is used by about 1,000 students. The entire facility
will be turned over to the arts school. There is an auditorium,
two gymnasiums, thirty-five or more classrooms, a cafeteria, and
other accommodations. Also, there are twenty acres of playing
fields. Some of the land will be used to build dormitories, and
the money for the dormitories, about $1 million, is now being
raised in Winston-Salem; most of the money is in hand and the
rest of it is in sight. Over 4,500 people have already contributed.
The campus will be completed and ready for the opening of
the school in September of 1965. At that time, it is expected
that 400 elementary, high school, and college students will begin
their work there.
I recognize with appreciation the co-operation of all the com-
peting cities. I congratulate and express my appreciation to the
representatives of these communities and regret that we have
only one school. Certainly the state is indebted to hundreds of
people in many places. I hope that all the places will now work
to make this school an institution for the whole state and for the
whole South and for the whole country. The children after all
will come from every place, and they are the purpose and sub-
stances of what we are about.
CONCERNING HIGHWAY PATROL MATTERS
May 9, 1964
[This defense of the Highway Patrol grew out of months of criticism of
the organization and charges that patrolmen were required to make arrests
and were promoted on the basis of a quota system of arrests. During the time
in which the question of arrests and quotas had been under discussion, the
Governor's Office received hundreds of letters from troopers who defended
the Highway Patrol.]
I think there is general agreement that it is time to wind up
the investigation of the morale and quota system of the Highway
Patrol. It has accomplished all it is going to accomplish, and it
is doing more harm than good now.
The Patrol is in the executive branch, but I have co-operated
620
Papers of Terry Sanford
with the inquiry and the hearings because, as always, I wanted
to co-operate with the General Assembly. It is time to conclude
this one.
I think the morale of the Patrol is hurt by two influences.
There are always a few disgruntled people in any organization,
and these do an organization no good.
Most patrolmen are proud of their organization. They love
the Patrol, and they will do everything possible to improve it.
The Patrol has built a wonderful reputation and its members
have every reason for tremendous pride.
The other detrimental influence has been the effort by some
legislators and some lawyers to discredit traffic law enforcement.
The legislative act to stop the use of an airplane to spot dan-
gerous speeders is an example of this wrong attitude. We are not
playing a sporting game of hounds and foxes. We are trying to
save lives. We intend to catch violators. We intend to enforce
the traffic laws. We intend to do everything we can to stop vio-
lations which cost lives. We are tough and we intend to remain
tough. Our patrolmen are courteous and considerate, but also
they have a lifesaving job to do.
A part of this wrong attitude is the false suggestion that some
kind of artificial arrest quota was required of patrolmen. This
isn't so, but we know that deaths go up as arrests go down.
Any time a lawyer asks a trooper on the witness stand if he has
to make a certain number of arrests to fulfill a quota, you can
be sure that lawyer is suggesting this simply to save a guilty client.
This device ought to be recognized as such.
The members of the legislature who fell for this old line have
done our people great harm.
All of this investigation of a quota system has made our pa-
trolmen so sensitive that arrests have indeed decreased; and
deaths have drastically increased.
I am reassuring our patrolmen that they will receive complete
support for a tough arrest policy. We expect them to enforce all
of the laws without fear or favor. They will receive absolute and
complete backing.
If a trooper is asked about a quota system, I hope he will an-
swer:
"Yes, we do have an official quota system. It is to arrest all of
the people who are violating the traffic laws. It is to make all the
arrests necessary to stop the killing, injuring, and destruction
taking place on our highways."
This is the only kind of quota system we intend to have.
Statements and Articles
621
ON THE SUCCESS OF THE KENNEDY MEMORIAL DRIVE
May 17, 1964
[For details concerning the Kennedy Memorial service in Chapel Hill, see
page 429.]
I am grateful to Hugh Morton, state chairman, and the 102
local chairmen who have made our drive for the Kennedy Me-
morial successful.
The treasurer, Andrew Jones,^^* does not have a final account-
ing, and will not have for two or three days. We do know that
most of the counties have reached their quotas, and most of those
which have not have asked for an additional week. We will work
with these counties over the next several days. The quota we
accepted is $230,000.
It is impossible to get an accounting from the local distribution
because a free child's ticket could have been picked up with
every adult ticket. Also we have received through the mail many
contributions for less than $10.00 and no ticket requested.
In any event, we know the drive for the library to house the
papers and records of President John F. Kennedy has been suc-
cessful. This is the first in the country, and North Carolina be-
comes the first state to deliver its quota. It will take us at least
a week to count everything and get all the county reports com-
pleted, but today I want the state committee, the local chairmen,
and all the people who have worked and all the people who con-
tributed to know we are most grateful.
APPEAL FOR RESPONSIBLE CAMPAIGN BEHAVIOR
AND ATTITUDES
May 24, 1964
In the last week of the campaign I would like to express my
belief that the state of North Carolina is more important than
the Governor's Office. This statement is made to all citizens.
Democrats and Republicans alike, as we face the end of a long
and important campaign.
I hope we can avoid reckless and irresponsible charges.
G. Andrew Jones, Jr. (1920- ), lawyer from Raleigh, Assistant Attorney
General, 1961-1963; veteran and retired Reserve Commander; State Budget Officer
since 1963. North Carolina Manual, 1965, 479; Governor's Appointment Book.
622
Papers of Terry Sanford
I hope we can make our great decision with calmness and de-
liberation, befitting the intelligent people of an enlightened state.
I hope w^e will rise above unsigned leaflets, rumors, slanders,
and fear tactics. I hope each citizen will vote for his choice, not
against the other candidates. I hope each citizen will vote in con-
fidence that his choice is good for the future of the state, not in
fear because of rumors that are always spread during the closing
days of a campaign but which invariably fade out when the elec-
tion is over.
If you get a leaflet not authorized by the headquarters of a
responsible candidate you can assume it is false.
If you hear a rumor repeated, you can know it is false, or it
would have been issued officially by the headquarters of a re-
sponsible candidate.
I hope the voters will throw away the leaflets and turn away
the rumor mongers. North Carolina does not need to do busi-
ness that way.
We can indeed vote for a candidate, as we choose, who will do
the most for the future of North Carolina.
URGING CITIZENS TO VOTE
May 29, 1964
The first and foremost duty of all of North Carolina voters on
Saturday is to exercise our greatest right— that of voting.
I sincerely trust that all voters, whether they are Democrats or
Republicans, will make a stop at their voting places the first
order of business Saturday.
I fully appreciate the fact that many citizens like to go to the
beaches or the mountains of our state on the week ends. Others
like to get out in the country or go fishing.
I sincerely trust that before you go to any of these places that
you will go to your polling place.
On Saturday all of us should remember that the right of the
ballot is the foundation for all of our other rights.
And, we should remember that one of our great strengths
over communism is the fact that we in America have free elec-
tions where the people can decide without intimidation who the
elected officials will be.
A lot of men have spent a lot of time in foxholes for free gov-
ernment. I hope every registered voters of North Carolina will
Statements and Articles
spend a few moments in the voting booth on Saturday for free
government.
The progress and future of North Carolina depend on the
decision the people make Saturday.
DENOUNCING ACTIONS OF THE KU KLUX KLAN
AS ILLEGAL
June 22, 1964
[The growing civil rights movement and the anticipation of federal civil
rights legislation perhaps did much to intensify Ku Klux Klan activity in
North Carolina. With an increase of Klan aggressiveness across the state,
Governor Sanford, in this and following statements, made his position quite
firm.]
Because there is a growing concern across the state, I think it
is necessary to remind the people involved that the Ku Klux
Klan is not going to take over North Carolina.
Taking the law into their hands, running people away, burn-
ing crosses, making threats, wearing hoods, are all illegal prac-
tices and are not going to be permitted.
In 1953, the General Assembly, following the conviction of a
number of members of the Ku Klux Klan, passed a law with
teeth in it.
It was designed primarily by Clifton L. Moore, then the solici-
tor who prosecuted the Klan members, who now is Associate
Justice of the North Carolina Supreme Court.
Here are the teeth, here is what is provided, here is what is
against the law:
1. It is against the law to belong to certain kinds of organiza-
tions: "It shall be unlawful for any person to join . . . solicit
members for ... or assist in any way any secret political society.
. . ." G.5. 14-12.3.
A secret society "shall mean any two or more persons . . .
combined or united for any common purpose whatsoever, who
shall use among themselves any certain grips, signs or password,
or who shall use for the advancement of any of their purposes
or as a part of their ritual any disguise of the person, face or
voice or any disguise whatsoever. . . ." G.S. 14-12.1.
"The term 'secret political society' shall mean any secret soci-
ety, as hereinbefore defined, which shall at any time have for a
purpose the hindering or aiding the success of any candidate for
public office, or the hindering or aiding the success of any politi-
624
Papers of Terry Sanford
cal party or organization, or violating any lawfully declared
policy of the government of the State or any of the laws and con-
stitutional provisions of the State." G.S. 14-12.1.
"The term 'secret military society' shall mean any secret soci-
ety . . . when members are illegally armed, or . . . have for a
purpose the engaging in any venture by members thereof which
shall require the illegal armed force. . . ." G.S. 14-12.1.
2. It is against the law to use "any signs, grips, passwords,
disguise of the face, person or voice, or any disguise whatsoever
in the furtherance of any illegal secret political purpose. . . ."
G.S. 14-12.4.
3. It is against the law to permit such a secret society to meet.
G.S. 14-12.5.
4. It is required that the regular meeting places be marked.
It is against the law to meet elsewhere unless newspaper notice
is given two days in advance. It is required that the membership
lists be available. G.S. 14-12.6.
5. It is against the law for a person over sixteen years old to
wear a mask, hood, or device whereby the person, face, or voice
is disguised, to be in a public place, or demand entrance or go
into someone else's residence. G.S. 14-12.8, 12.9.
6. It is against the law to burn a cross on the property of an-
other without first getting written permission. G.S. 14-12.12.
The SBI has been asked to keep a running investigation.
The State Highway Patrol is being instructed to watch for
violations.
Local law enforcement officers should also watch for violations.
Superior Court solicitors have the responsibility for bringing
the indictments, and I am sure they will do so where they uncover
violations.
Let the KKK get this clear. I am not going to tolerate their
illegal actions, and the people of North Carolina are not going
to put up with it.
I repeat, the KKK is not going to take over North Carolina.
ON THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT
July 7, 1964
The Civil Rights Act is the law of the land, and the question
confronting us now is what shall be our reaction to the law.
Every indication is that the citizens of North Carolina will
obey the law. This is the result of a good climate of tolerance
Statements and Articles
625
and understanding which exists here, and it is a wonderful credit
to the people of the state.
Everybody can be sure this new law is going to be tested in
the courts very soon, but in the meantime, as law-abiding people,
we must rely on the established legal procedures in the courts
and not on force of any kind.
Force and bitterness are not in keeping with the North Caro-
lina tradition, and we must not let such feeling control our
actions.
Before the enactment of the civil rights statute many of the
cities and towns of North Carolina were making vigorous volun-
tary efforts to provide much greater opportunities which the
Negroes sought. At the state level we had established the North
Carolina Good Neighbor Council in recognition of the justice
of the Negroes' plea for better economic opportunities. The
council has been conducting a program planned to increase job
opportunities for Negroes and to sharpen the skills of Negroes
who might be available to fill better jobs. This work must con-
tinue if substance is to be given to the larger measure of freedom
for all people.
I repeat a statement that I made some months ago to the fol-
lowing effect: Now is a time not merely to look back to freedom,
but forward to the fulfillment of its meaning. Despite great prog-
ress, the Negroes' opportunity to obtain a good job has not been
achieved in most cases across the country. Reluctance to accept
the Negro in employment is the greatest single block to his con-
tinued progress and to the full use of the human potential of
the nation and its states.
It is my hope that the spirit which has characterized much of
the work that has been done in the interest of racial justice in
the past several years in this state will survive and be strength-
ened and that the Negro leaders will manifest their own sense
of increased responsibility. They should recognize that the fed-
eral statute cannot accomplish for them the economic advance
they seek and that they will need the good will of employers to
reduce the economic disparity they suffer now.
My appeal to our people of both races is unchanged, there-
fore. That appeal is that we honor the law— that we "deal justly,
love mercy, and walk humbly with our God." That way we will
find peace and the kind of progress that can enrich all our peo-
ple both spiritually and materially.
626
Papers of Terry Sanford
ON THE DEATH OF L. Y. BALLENTINE
July 19, 1964
Mrs. Sanford and I join all North Carolinians in extending to
Mrs. Ballentine our deepest sympathy.
Throughout his life, "Stag" Ballentine served the citizens of
his state.
As a county commissioner of Wake County, as a state senator,
as Lieutenant-Governor, and as Commissioner of Agriculture,
"Stag" Ballentine devoted his energy and talents to making
North Carolina a better state.
Because of his work, our farms are more productive. Our
farmers are living better lives and our farm economy is stronger.
Citizens both in the rural areas and in the towns have benefited.
His interest in improving education has benefited every young
person in the state.
I am ordering all state flags to be flown at half-staff in respect
to the record of service he compiled for North Carolina.
URGING SUPPORT OF THE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE
FOR PRESIDENT
July 23, 1964
Since the Republican convention I have been listening to the
arguments against President Johnson, and I am more than ever
convinced that the people of North Carolina have everything to
gain by supporting the Democratic party and President Lyndon
B. Johnson in the national election this fall.
There are seven points around which the campaign seems to
be shaping up, and all of these favor President Johnson.
1. The world is so strained and the daily stresses are so severe
that our worries and fears at times almost overwhelm us. It is a
temptation to be against everything, such are the times. But
being against things doesn't improve the situation. The true
anwers cannot come from the pressure of extremist groups who
would destroy more than they improve. We need a President
who will not trade on fears, but rather will work creatively and
positively in the true tradition of the country. We need a Presi-
dent who looks to the future and works to make it better. We
need a President with faith and confidence in what this country
can do. President Johnson is that kind of man.
At the twentieth reunion of the 517th Parachute Combat Team's invasion of
Southern France, Governor Sanford jumped from the training tower at Fort Bragg
on August 15, 1964. He entertained his fellow paratroopers at the Governor's
Mansion during the course of the reunion.
Statements and Articles
627
2. In North Carolina today race relations is the chief topic.
This is a tough problem. Of course, we are all disturbed, but
we cannot select the President on this issue alone. The problem
is not going away regardless of who is President. We cannot
afford the kind of leadership which would destroy the lines of
communication and set race against race. That would indeed
bring on problems that we couldn't handle. There is an even
more important side. We need a President with the courage and
the Christianity to try to develop human understanding in a
world full of ferment. With the peoples of Africa and Asia
emerging, with the freedom of civilization at stake, this great
nation of freedom cannot afford to deny the full opportunities
of life to all of her people. Mature people understand that. They
understand that the President of the United States of America
cannot condone second-class citizenship, no matter how unpopu-
lar that might make him at home. All of this is difficult for the
President, and he needs our help and support.
3. The economy has never been better. The gross national
product is at an all time high, personal income is up, profits are
up, and unemployment is down. Business is good and getting
better. The Kennedy-Johnson program of promoting the econ-
omy has paid off, and the program will be advanced under Pres-
ident Johnson during the next four years. We have strong growth
and expansion without inflation. North Carolina especially needs
this kind of economic climate, because we have so much to gain
right now from economic growth. We need prosperity as never
before, and we are in a better position to profit from it than ever
before.
4. We need a President who can cut costs of government with-
out cutting economic progress. This President Johnson has done.
We need a President who understands that the strengths of the
space age economy are complex, and who knows how to keep all
of the elements in balance. We need a man like President John-
son, who comprehends that, unfortunately, there are no easy
answers to complex problems. We can't abolish government.
Right now in North Carolina we are making too much progress
to turn our backs on the wise and comprehensive approach we
are taking under the leadership of Lyndon Johnson.
5. We would like to have a President who has compassion for
people. The foolish idea that it is a sign of weakness to be con-
cerned about unfortunate people is no part of the American tra-
dition. The charge that the poverty program is designed just to
get votes hardly stands up. Not many of these people vote. Cer-
tainly the children of poverty, whom the President is trying to
628
Papers of Terry Sanford
lift up, do not vote. The poverty program is not a dole or a give-
away. It is a creative way of getting away from doles and hand-
outs. Anyone who will take time to read the bill will see this is
a program of education, true new and unconventional educa-
tion, but nonetheless education. The hopes of these children and
parents caught up in a web of disadvantage cannot be dismissed
by callous statements. We need a President with compassion and
feeling who will improve our economy and our lives by lifting
up these people so that they might help themselves.
6. Most of all the people of North Carolina need a President
who can ease the tensions of the world. President Johnson has
demonstrated that he is calm, mature, and a superb negotiator.
The dangers in Cuba and Viet Nam have been with us more
than the four years of this administration, and while we would
like to find an easy clear-cut way out, we know we cannot "shoot
'em up" in the old wild west tradition. The constant pressures
being applied by our government will win out. The President
has the strength of character, the brave patience, as well as the
patriotism, to see us through. He will take the intelligent path,
not the foolhardy path.
7. In these times of national peril we need a President with
stamina and stability and courage. President Johnson is that kind
of man. He will not collapse after keeping the store for less than
a week. He will stand strong and firm in any emergency.
REPLY TO FRIENDS DESIRING TO PROMOTE HIS
CANDIDACY FOR VICE-PRESIDENT
August 18, 1964
Like anyone else I appreciate any and all kind words from
friends, and I am grateful for their friendship in promoting me
as a possible vice-presidential candidate.
At the same time I wouldn't want anybody to think I am vain
enough to believe this is a possibility.
So I think I should make it clear that I am not running for
the job and don't expect to get it, all the time remaining grate-
ful for the generous efforts of Dr. John Dees, Ernest Parker, and
the others.
Statements and Articles
629
COMMENT ON THE DEMOCRATIC TICKET
August 26, 1964
I think the Democrats have put together an outstanding ticket,
made up of two of the most able men in public service today.
We had indicated in advance that we would be willing to go
with President Johnson's choice, and we should be. It was his
responsibility to suggest the name of the man he considered best
suited to become President in event that was necessary.
I am well aware of the feeling that Senator Humphrey has
been criticized for his role in the matter of promoting civil
rights. I would hope all would remember that Senator Hum-
phrey has led the fights for sounder agricultural programs, has
worked for conservation and education measures which have
greatly benefited all of the South as well as the country.
The Johnson-Humphrey Democratic ticket will be the best
for the future and the progress of North Carolina.
ARTICLES ON SUBJECT OF
"STRATEGY FOR STATE DEVELOPMENT"
September 22, 23, 24, 1964
[In a series of three articles, Governor Sanford reviewed North Carolina's
lack of planning of the past, explained why and how key people had met to
work out "a sound policy of planning," and summarized the report which
had resulted from these efforts. Not only were a number of Dan K. Moore's
supporters asked to participate in the initial planning sessions, but they were
also appointed to the advisory committee named to implement the plan.
This co-operative effort helped assure the translation of a report on paper
to future reality.]
I
Veterans Day will be celebrated within a few weeks, and think-
ing back to the battles of World War II remainds me of what is
going on in North Carolina today. The state government every
day is fighting a battle to gain more employment and higher in-
comes for North Carolinians. We are in daily competition for a
slice of the nation's economic wealth. The fight is intense and it
gets fiercer every day. Furthermore, the conditions under which
we fight change constantly with the rapid advance of technology.
This battle has been costly and difficult so far. In spite of the
money the state and private enterprise have invested since World
War II, the income of the average North Carolinian has re-
630
Papers of Terry Sanford
mained at just about 70 per cent of the national figure. We have
liad to run hard just to keep up. Nor is the outlook for an easy
victory. A competent, independent company has completed a
study which predicted that, although North Carolina will grow
in riches, in 1976 it can expect to be in forty-second place in per
capita income. That is just where we are now. The report also
suggests that we will have a decreasing share of the nation's
wealth. This, however, is a projection of what we are expected to
do. It definitely is not a measure of what we can do.
We might invest more public money in programs to promote
growth. We will do some of this, but we can't always find enough
money. There is an alternative which will help regardless of how
much we invest. We can spend the money we have more
effectively. To do this we need to know more about the current
state of the state and the likely changes coming up in the future.
We are certain we can get a larger slice of the national economy
if we plan ahead.
The economic battle is like a military battle. The commander
groups his forces for action just as we group state employees into
departments. He expects each group to be resourceful and to
respond to the situation it finds in the field. No general, though,
would send his troops into the field without an over-all strategy.
Nor would he do so without pretty good information about the
opposition and the terrain. State governments across this nation
have traditionally operated without adequate information, and
in most states there isn't even a strategy planning staff to assist
the governor. The way to get ahead of the other states, to get a
bigger slice of the economy, it seems to me, is to beat them on
information and strategy.
Before I got the job, I thought I was a pretty good student of
the Office of Governor. But I found that I had no conception of
the demands upon it. One man cannot develop a co-ordinated pro-
gram without staff planning assistance. I suspect every recent
governor has come to realize this, but perhaps not until near the
end of his term. I am resolved not to handicap the next man by
ducking the issue and leaving him without this kind of help.
A governor needs it most at the beginning of his term when he
is shaping his program.
Private enterprise provides a comparison with the state, too.
In industry the "research and development" function has become
very important. No industry which expects to survive as a profit-
able enterprise would think of overlooking it. Many of them
spend large percentages of their funds on research and on plan-
ning in order to be able to anticipate the conditions of the future.
Any business which did not do so would soon have to surrender
Statements and Articles
631
to the competition. Any state which does not do so may likewise
have to surrender.
Although the money spent by North Carolina on research
and information and on planning for the future has been some-
what haphazard, there has been some.
North Carolina had a State Planning Board in the 1930's and
1940's which did some excellent work. However, the initiative
came from an agency of the federal government. With the board
having been placed pretty much outside the mainstream of ad-
ministrative decision-making, its program was terminated in 1947.
Several of the state government's departments do a good job of
planning their programs. There have also been some notable
special studies, for instance the "Carlyle Report" which charted a
new direction for higher education in North Carolina.
It is not simply that there has been no thinking about the
future. The difficulty is that it has been spotty. There is not
enough co-ordination between programs, either. All of our depart-
ments must look ahead, and the whole state government must
become a single, co-ordinated instrument for development.
In 1961 I installed an assistant for economic development to
take an over-all look at the economic situation and at our state
programs. He has been a great help in shaping programs which
require the co-operation of more than one state agency or which
deal with the federal government or with local development
groups. This helped a great deal, but more manpower is needed
for proper planning. It can mean the difference between making
the right or wrong decisions or spending tax dollars more ef-
ficiently, or less so.
I have been searching for the best way to go about systematic
and intelligent planning for the future. To help me determine
how a better job can be done I had a study conducted during
the summer. I charged the group making the study with helping
me find the way to organize, staff and budget for strategic develop-
ment planning.
The next two articles will describe the findings and the recom-
mendations.
II
All summer long we have been drawing up plans for a sound
policy of planning for the state. Under a grant from the Housing
and Home Finance Agency, we have brought together a number
of very competent people to advise with us— they have come up
with a good report.
"Strategy for Development" is an important report. It contains
recommendations on how North Carolina's state government can
632
Papers of Terry Sanford
organize, staff and finance for better program and policy planning.
The immediate result could be better development of our state at
less cost. The ultimate result could be that we would catch and
pass the states we now trail.
The study was done by a small, special staff under the direction
of George Stephens, Jr., my assistant for economic development;
they were all experts in the subject of planning and government.
If they had been lazy, they probably could have written a report
after consulting each other. But they didn't.
First they talked with every department head about his pro-
gram, his ideas for the future, and his contacts with other
agencies. The relationship to federal agencies and local govern-
ments was discussed. An inventory was done on what information
was collected by each agency and what the source was. The depart-
ment heads got a chance to say what information and forecasting
services they really need to do the best job.
Most agencies said that they get overwhelmed in dealing with
work thrust on them. They noted that they seldom look beyond
the biennial budget period. On the other hand some departments
were found to be doing an excellent planning job.
The next step was to discuss these problems in groups. To give
an example, all agencies concerned with economic development
were brought together for a seminar. It was led by State Senator
Gordon Hanes, a man experienced in government and in in-
dustry. Philip Hammer, a top ranked economic consultant sat
in to question and to comment.
Similar meetings were held for those involved in natural
resources, human resources, regional and metropolitan develop-
ment, and for the experts in the use of data and forecasting.
Now, for the past two years or so we have held meetings at
which we've asked each department to explain and discuss its
past and future programs with other officials. These meetings
stimulated a lot of thought. It was an eye opener, though, to dis-
cover that the seminars for the planning study provided the first
occasion for many of these officials to meet to discuss programs of
mutual interest.
Consider the problem of developing our tourist industry. It is
one of the fastest growing parts of our economy— an increasing
number of our citizens are drawing their livelihood from the
tourist business. To develop it properly will require a co-ordinated
effort by the State Recreation Commission; the Department of
Conservation and Development's Divisions of Parks, Forestry,
Travel Information, and Geodetic Survey (for mapping) ; the
Department of Water Resources; the Wildlife Commission; the
Highway Commission; and training through the Department of
Statements and Articles
633
Public Instruction, Community Colleges, Higher Education, and
the Employment Security Commission. In addition there are
several federal agencies and lots of local governments involved.
The tasks of industrial development, education, agricultural
development, and other programs also require the co-operation of
several agencies.
Complicated? It surely is! And they can't work together ef-
fectively without a common plan, program, policy, or whatever
you want to call it. Furthermore, that plan must be under con-
stant study to meet changing obligations and opportunities.
This summer state officials told us they want the opportunity to
plan, to talk together more, to co-ordinate their efforts and to have
access to useful data and good forecasts. Those meetings let a lot
of fresh air into state government.
Ill
In two previous articles I have given the reasons for producing
''Strategy for Development," a report on how North Carolina
can do a better job of planning for the future. The way in which
the study was produced was described, too.
At this point it is appropriate to let the report speak for itself
through its summary of present shortcomings in respect to good
planning:
The State lacks a staff responsible for focusing on problems affecting more
than one agency.
The State lacks a staff capable of concentrating on special problems and
providing immediate information to the Governor and department heads.
The State lacks a clearing house for collecting data and communicating
information, programs and decisions.
The State lacks sufficient personnel to perform program planning func-
tions within key agencies.
The State presently lacks adequate arrangements for coordinated assistance
to metropolitan and regional planning efforts.
The State lacks a staff to plan for and coordinate federal programs.
"Strategy for Development" then follows with recommen-
dations to plug the gaps and achieve a more businesslike approach
in managing the affairs of the state:
It is recommended that a Long-Range Planning Division be activated
within the Department of Administration as authorized in G.S. 143-337.
It is recommended that the Planning Division initiate comprehensive
planning activities within three major areas of State responsibility: econo-
mic research and development, natural resources development and human
resources development.
It is recommended that existing sources of information within State Govern-
ment be improved by employing, in close cooperation with the Planning
Division, the most advanced techniques of data processing, communication
and forecasting.
634
Papers of Terry Sanford
It is recommended that key State agencies strengthen their planning
activities by assigning full-time planning responsibility to agency personnel.
It is recommended that the Planning Division determine a system of plan-
ning regions and coordinate programs of assistance to aid the establishment
of professionally staffed regional planning commissions.
It is recommended that the Planning Division become a center for infor-
mation concerning federal assistance programs and coordinate planning
for the most effective use of funds available to meet the State's needs.
It is recommended that the Planning Division be prepared to conduct
special studies at the request of the Governor and department executives.
It is recommended that the planning process initiated by this study be
continued by securing a professional staff and financial support by matching
State personnel and financial contributions with federal funds."
In conclusion the report says: "North Carolina State Govern-
ment must have the capacity to anticipate its problems, evaluate
alternative paths to the future and make choices most conducive
to sound development. A systematic state planning process can
help provide the means to these ends. As the planning program
reaches maturity, State officials will be assured of having the
machinery, the information and the resources necessary to move
North Carolina forward. Through this process North Carolina
can shape its own destiny and most effectively serve its citizens."
I subscribe to the recommendations. Years of study of state
government and almost four years as governor tell me they are
sound. We are already moving to carry them out.
I have named an advisory committee to translate this plan into
action. The chairman is George Broadrick, a banker from Char-
lotte; Watts Hill, Jr., an insurance executive of Durham; Thomas
D. Bunn, lawyer and legislator of Raleigh; General J. R. Town-
send, former city manager of Greensboro and Chairman of the
State Water Resources Board; William F. Henderson, Executive
Secretary of the Medical Care Commission; George Randall, Di-
rector of Prisons.
It will be the committee's responsibility to organize and get
under way an effective strategy for development. This is our
opportunity to gather the information, to make the plans, to look
to the future, to leapfrog the state ahead.
ANNOUNCING "WHISTLE STOP TOUR" OF
MRS. LYNDON B. JOHNSON
September 27, 1964
Mrs. Lyndon B. Johnson will be in North Carolina on Tues-
day and Wednesday, October 6 and 7. Mrs. Sanford and I are
Statements and Articles
635
honored to be her hosts and to accompany her on her trip
through our state.
Her precise schedule will be announced within a day or so,
but generally, she will come from Virginia to Raleigh and then
to Charlotte, making stops at a number of places in between.
There is a fair chance that the President will join her at
whatever point his schedule will permit, probably Raleigh.
Mrs. Johnson will come with a message that should appeal to
the hearts and minds of all North Carolinians, and indeed to all
southerners. She herself is a native of the South. . . .
Her message will be one of good will, of compassion for the
problems of others, and of progress and understanding which
has brought a new prosperity and broader opportunities to all
North Carolinians.
The Johnsons are our people, serving in the most demanding
position of leadership in all the world. As they serve the nation,
and through the nation the hopes of freedom around the world,
they deserve the support of their native region.
I hope that in North Carolina we can have the largest crowds
and the warmest support for Mrs. Johnson.
All Democratic candidates for state leadership, our two dis-
tinguished senators and our congressmen, and party leaders will
be on the train with Mrs. Johnson.
I hope all citizens of both parties will turn out to greet Mrs.
Johnson on her trip through her native South.
STATEMENT MADE ON ELECTION EVENING
November 3, 1964
It already is obvious that President Johnson is the overwhelm-
ing choice of America.
He is carrying North Carolina by a significant majority.
North Carolina, the nation and the free world will benefit
from today's vote.
Our state will continue its unbroken march of progress in this
century under Dan Moore, Bob Scott, a Democratic General
Assembly, and a Democratic Council of State.
It is deeply gratifying to see North Carolinians again demon-
strating their faith and purpose in education by approving the
nonpartisan school bond issue.
636
Papers of Terry Sanford
APPEAL FOR SUPPORT OF THE TOBACCO QUOTA
REFERENDUM
December 3, 1964
The income of North Carolina's tobacco farmers is at stake on
December 15.
If the tobacco quota referendum fails, there would be no sup-
port prices on tobacco.
Some of our tobacco leaders have told me that flue-cured to-
bacco prices would drop at least to 30 cents, and maybe even to
20 cents if we had no support prices. Such a price cut would
bring on a deep depression for much of North Carolina.
There are more than sixty counties in the state where flue-
cured tobacco provides a great deal of income to people in the
county. These people are not just farmers but also the merchants
and businessmen who sell to farmers.
Take Wake County, for example. Its tobacco income in 1964
was almost $21 million. Without support prices, that would have
been reduced to less than $15 million. Such a cut would take
many times $15 million from the incomes of service stations,
clothing stores, oil dealers, hardware stores, farm equipment
dealers, fertilizer firms— all the people who deal with farmers.
To get down to a personal basis, consider the case of a single
tobacco farmer. Eliminating support prices would cut his tobacco
income per acre in half or less. If he now grosses $1,200 an acre,
he would get less than $600 without supports. That's hardly
enough to pay for labor and supplies.
Losing the tobacco program would mean wrecking not only
the farmer and people who sell to him; it would mean bank-
rupting our tobacco warehouse system, destroying our great
tobacco organizations, turning many tobacco land communities
and towns into ghost areas.
There is one thing about this referendum that everyone voting
in it must understand:
The vote is only on whether to continue the tobacco program.
If the necessary two-thirds majority is not gained, there will be
no tobacco program.
The widespread controversy over the recently announced 19.5
per cent cut has a lot of people confused. They believe that they
can vote down the acreage cut.
Now I realize that the cut hurts a lot of growers very much.
It is not an easy thing to take, but it's vitally necessary to help
line up supply and demand.
Statements and Articles
637
But the December 15 vote cannot reduce the cut without elim-
inating the whole tobacco program. That means growers would
have to take a far worse cut— in their tobacco incomes.
As one man said, "What's 20 per cent of nothing? That's what
we would have without a program."
The cotton quota program, too, is vital to the future of North
Carolina. Cotton would be supported at 50 per cent of parity
without price supports. Cotton income in the state would be
reduced drastically.
The structure of Tobacco Associates, which promotes sale of
flue-cured tobacco, is tied strongly to the over-all tobacco pro-
gram. Without a tobacco program, there would be no basis for
financing the work of Tobacco Associates.
The North Carolina Peanut Growers Association, in its ten
years of existence, has done a remarkable job of marketing and
promoting our peanuts.
I urge farmers to vote "Yes" on all of these programs which
are so vital to North Carolina.
WARNING TO THE KU KLUX KLAN
December 7, 1964
[Newspapers announced that the Christmas parade at Louisburg would
be integrated for the first time in 1964. Consequently, the Ku Klux Klan
made several threats against the staging of the event, thus provoking this
gubernatorial rebuke.]
It is the height of sacrilege for the Ku Klux Klan to try to
inject hatred into the Christmas parade at Louisburg.
I would urge all members of the KKK to read again the Christ-
mas story and the message of good will to all men contained in
the Bible.
In the meantime, I am instructing the State Highway Patrol
to provide all aid necessary to insure that the citizens of Louis-
burg will be unmolested when they hold their traditional Christ-
mas parade.
If there are illegal acts on the part of KKK members, they will
be prosecuted.
638
Papers of Terry Sanford
ON THE DECISION TO PARDON BOYD PAYTON
December 31, 1964
[Boyd Payton's original sentence was reduced by Governor Sanford in
July, 1961. See statement and explanation on pages 552-553.]
The case of Boyd Payton and his associates has been before
this office from time to time, and like all other cases it has re-
ceived careful attention.
In January of 1963 seven of the jurors who sat on the case
petitioned me, after reciting some facts and opinions, that they
"recommend that each of the defendants now be granted a full
pardon."
I have decided not to take action on all of them but I have
decided to grant a pardon to Boyd Payton for two reasons:
First, the evidence against him was different, causing Mr.
Justice Bobbitt to file a dissenting opinion saying, "In my view,
the evidence, as to Payton, is insufficient to support the verdict."
Second, Payton has been unable to earn a living, having cut
his ties with the union, and having found that this conviction
has been a bar to other employment. I, for one, do not believe
a conviction should be allowed to dog the tracks of a man for
all of his life.
I have talked about executive clemency for Payton to a large
number of people. They are split about fifty-fifty on whether
I should grant a pardon.
I have decided, out of a sense of compassion, to grant a pardon.
NEWS CONFERENCES
[Throughout his term of office. Governor Sanford held regularly scheduled
news conferences. A number of these were transcribed and distributed to
North Carolina newspaper editors and radio and television news directors.
Because they include a variety of topics and also show the ease with which
the Governor answered questions of reporters, the news-conference trans-
scripts are of interest. One is published here.]
August 10, 1961
Roy Parker (News and Observer): Governor, what is the cur-
rent status of the special session and the bond election for the
bond that has already been authorized?
News Conferences
639
Governor Sanford: We will issue a proclamation in a day or so
calling for the election on November 7 for the bonds authorized
by the General Assembly. This includes what might be called
the usual types of bonds authorized by the session of the General
Assembly which cover many of the items that are financed by
bond issues— educational projects, buildings which are customar-
ily financed by bond issues rather than out of current revenues.
The self-liquidating port bonds will be in that issue and the
others authorized by the General Assembly. So we will get on
with that election and carry out the mandate of the General
Assembly, and we will worry about other issues and other ses-
sions and other elections at a later date. To put it specifically,
there will be no special session prior to November 7.
Brandt Ayers (Raleigh Times): Are you considering calling a
special session next year?
Governor: Well, I'm not even considering what I am going to
do in December. I've hardly thought about what I am going to
do tomorrow.
Parker: There'll be no special session ...
Governor: Prior to this election.
Scott Jarrett (WFMY-TV): Governor, have you had a chance
to study or read the State Civil Rights Committee report put out
yesterday?
Governor: No.
Parker: Governor, do you intend to keep Ed Scheidt on as Com-
missioner of Motor Vehicles?
Governor: Well, I haven't made a decision on that.
George Penny (WRAL-Radio) : Governor, recently some of the
other department heads of the state got an increase in pay. Was
he not overlooked in that?
Governor: Did he get an increase?
Penny: According to my recollection, I don't believe he did.
Governor: You want to know whether it was deliberate or acci-
dental?
Penny: Yes, that's what I want to know.
Governor: Well, I can't answer that question because I don't
know.
Penny: Who could answer it?
Governor: Well, I could, but I just don't have the facts today.
I'm like you, I'm not sure whether he got a raise or not.
Penny: I'm pretty certain he did not.
Governor: Well, I'll bet he would know.
640
Papers of Terry Sanford
MoTTE Griffith {Raleigh Times): Governor, yesterday, you've
probably seen it in the paper, I don't know, one of the clerks
here . . .
Governor: What do you mean "the" paper? [Laughter].
Griffith: I said "in the paper," a clerk here who had been a
prisoner was arrested for peeping torn . . .
Governor: Yes.
Griffith: And he was fired this morning. Do you have any com-
ment on that? Several weeks ago you made some observations on
prisoner rehabilitation.
Governor: Well, when you start trying to work with individuals
and give people jobs, it's sort of like playing ball. You win some,
you lose some, and some get rained out. I think that is so of indi-
viduals. You give people a break. Some people justify your con-
fidence in them. Some people don't. It's just one of those things.
It doesn't in any way change my opinion that we need a program
which will in every possible way lessen repeaters in our prison
system. I suppose that's the implication in any question relating
to it. I w^ould say that it does not, that people are going to con-
tinue to fall by the wayside, both those that have, and those who
hRxe not, prior to that had any difficulty with the law. It's just
one of those unfortunate things about human nature. I'm very
sorry that anybody got in difficulty and we hope that it will be
kept at a minimum.
Jerry Elliott (WPTF-Radio) : Governor, have you had any
late reports on the status of the price-fixing investigation?
Governor: No.
Ayers: Governor, have many ex-prisoners been hired by the
state to your knowledge?
Governor: I don't have any figures on that. I doubt if very many
have been hired.
Ayers: Does the firing of this man represent a policy that if . . .
Governor: Well, it represents a policy to this extent, that we are
going to let most people go who are convicted of being peeping
toms [laughter] .
Elliott: But not all of them [laughter].
Penny: Why would you say that is a more serious offense than
stealing typewriters and adding machines and that sort of thing?
Governor: Well, have ^ve caught anybody stealing typewriters,
adding machines?
Penny: No, sir, but this man that was convicted of peeping torn
had served time for stealing type^vriters and adding machines and
you've got a lot of them around here.
News Conferences
641
Governor: A lot of peeping toms or a lot of typewriter thieves?
Well, it shows that he's versatile anyhow, he . . . [laughter]
Parker: Governor, have you got any implication as to why they
are still holding up Mr. Malcolm Seawell's appointment?
Governor: No, I'm not in on that policy level.
Governor: I noticed a paper, not the paper, had something to
say about the ax falling today. I would say this, I appreciate the
fact that a lot of people are probably wondering about the ax,
but I remind all of you that I said that I wasn't coming into office
to fire people just for the sake of firing them, I wasn't coming in
here to upset the orderly administration of government simply
to reward those people who have been of help during the elec-
tions, that my primary obligation was getting good people in
office and keeping good people in office and seeing that this gov-
ernment is run most effectively and most efficiently, and that will
be my attitude. Now I know it's pleasant to see the ax fall and
it's entertaining for a lot of folks around Raleigh and maybe else-
where, too. So I just want to clear that up. There will be no
mass turnover simply for the sake of turnover. We will, itom
time to time, change people where we think that the job might
be done more efficiently. We will change people where we think
maybe a little new life or new spirit would do some good. But I
made up my mind a long time ago that, number one, that in no
way at any time would I ever be vindictive in replacing people
or changing things around and that I would not change them
around simply for the sake of changing, that the only way I
thought I could improve the services to the state, I am going to
take my time and be certain that when we keep people on who
are now in office that we are keeping them on because that is
for the best interest of the state. When we let them go, that, too,
will be in the best interest and I'll have announcements from
time to time about changes, but it will be in the light of this
approach: to provide better state services for the people.
Griffith: Governor, at least two lawmakers seem to think the
ax might fall in the near future. Mr. Jackson has been reported
as being in Raleigh on a permanent basis and so has Mr. Cohoon.
Are you planning to appoint either of these two gentlemen in
the near future?
Governor: I'll say this, that both of those gentlemen, or either
one of them, would make mighty good men in state government.
And I'd consider myself very fortunate if I got them to join this
administration.
Penny: Have you made any attempt to get them to join the ad-
ministration?
642
Papers of Terry Sanford
Governor: Well, I'll say that I have had some preliminary con-
versations with them.
Elliott: Would you include Mr. Herbert Hardy in that general
statement, Governor?
Governor: Well, I . . . that I have had preliminary conversations
with him and that he would make a good man?
Elliott: Yes.
Governor: Well, there's no question about that. I could name
170 in the General Assembly.
Griffith: Including the 13 or 14 Republicans too?
Governor: Oh, yes, in fact I'm appointing a couple of Republi-
cans. Is that announcement ready, Graham?
Graham Jones (Press Secretary) : Sir? [Laughter.]
Governor: Well, it's not ready, but ....
Jones: You have already announced several. Governor, including
Mr. West of Cherokee, and I think you have two that you are
planning to appoint to the Board of Elections.
Governor: Yes. Incidentally, those two appointed to the Board
of Elections will be from a list submitted by the Republican
Executive Committee and they will be people who will fairly
represent the interest of the minority party as well as the over-
riding interest of the state. I think it is only fair if you put Re-
publicans on a board that they be Republicans recognized as
Republicans by that party.
Ayers: Will Mr. Voseburgh be one of them, Governor?
Governor: Who is Voseburgh?
Ayers: He is an almost attorney.
Governor: Did he pass the bar?
Ayers: No.
Penny: Any comment?
Governor: All I'm glad is that I didn't flunk it when I took it.
I'm sorry for anybody who does.
Phil Ellis (WPTF-Radio) : Would you mind amplifying on that
bear incident you were talking about in Macon County the other
night?
Governor: Oh, I had a little run-in with a bear up there in the
mountains a couple of years ago. But that's a long story and it's
better told by Dick Phillips or Pat Taylor because I am inclined
to stick to the truth. At any rate, we were camping up there and
a bear got our food in the middle of the night and in spite of
the fact that I threw rocks at him, he wouldn't leave any of it.
They are not vicious though, they tell me.
News Conferences
643
Ellis: You going to take any chances?
Governor: Well, as Pat Taylor points out, that's the general
rule, but how do you know when a bear will come along who is
an exception?
Parker: Governor, have you received an invitation to this next
meeting of the Southern Governors?
Governor: No.
Ayers: Governor, although most of the migrants are now in New
Jersey, I wonder if you would encourage in any formal avenue
of correcting some of the situations that existed with the Em-
ployment Security Commission? They can, under certain condi-
tions blacklist people from taking on migrants the next season
and my question is, would you in the cases in thirty camps that
have found to be in violation of the only state statute, would
you encourage the ESC to blacklist these camps if something is
not done to correct those situations in violation of the state law?
Governor: Would you repeat the question? [Laughter.]
Ayers: Should I start in the middle?
Governor: As I understand the question, you want to know if
we will attempt to be more vigorous in enforcing the law. Now
as I understand the question and as I understand the situation,
on the state level, we have pretty well enforced the law. Possibly
on the health situation on the local level, the camps have been
at times inspected at the beginning of the season and then for
various reasons, maybe a lack of adequate personnel or for other
reasons, the local health authorities haven't been too vigilant in
continuing inspection. Let me make this clear, though, as my
attitude. I think the farmer has a responsibility for providing the
kind of camp which can be kept clean. That goes to the early
inspection and that's when the state and local agencies come in
and look it over. But I think we ought to find a way to put the
burden of keeping it clean, not on the farmer, who is out trying
as best he can to make ends meet and to pay back his seed and
fertilizer bills, and that's been the case in the last several years
in most of the farm economy. I think we ought to find a way to
put the burden on this straw boss, this group leader, to keep
camps clean once that the camp is in proper shape in the first
instance. I don't think it is fair to put all of this burden on the
farmer. He contracts with the group leader to provide labor and
I think he ought also to contract with him that he will keep the
living conditions up to standard. So, as I have said before— and
drew some criticism from your paper for not putting every farm-
er in jail— I don't intend to put every farmer in jail and I don't
644
Papers of Terry Sanford
think that we ought to crack down in that way. I think that most
of them have provided fairly good situations in the first instance.
I think that our desire in the future ought to be that we put the
burden on the person who is in a position to keep control of it
and if he doesn't, we ought to outlaw him and not let him serve
as a broker for labor anymore. I think that that would get at it
right away. And, I think that you agree, from the articles I read
that you wrote and which I think did a great deal of good in
stirring up public interest, I think that you agree that the key
man in this thing is the labor broker so to speak or the crew
chief or whatever he is called. He has control of the people and
I think it is only fair that the farmer put the burden on him and
I think our laws ought to be directed in that manner.
Ayers: In other words, you would encourage Employment Se-
curity to blacklist certain crew chiefs.
Governor: I think that is the key to it. We can't blacklist the
farmer and keep him from getting his potatoes out of the ground.
That is part of the vital economy of the state and he is not the
man in a position to do something about it. But the person who
is making that middle man's profit is in a position, as I analyze
it, to do something about it. And my efforts are going to be di-
rected at making him an honest man.
Ayers: He is. Governor, but the farmer himself is the man who
establishes . . .
Governor: Yes . . .
Ayers: . . . and in this case it was the law that required sanitary . . .
Governor: Yes, that sanitary conditions be provided. Whether
or not they are kept sanitary, of course . . .
Ayers: Well, now if in certain cases according to the Board of
Health there were not even privies provided.
Governor: Yes, well, I don't think those camps ought to be cer-
tified in the first instance. I think when you certify a camp as
being in proper shape at the first of the season that the farmer
has provided his essential responsibility at the point. From then
on, it ought to be up to the crew chief.
Ayers: But in those instances in which they . . .
Governor: Well, if they don't, they can't be certified, they can't
use them. If they aren't up to standard, they ought not to be cer-
tified, and I would not favor any closing of eyes as to the basic
condition of the camp. It ought to be in a condition it could be
kept in a sanitary state.
Ayers: If it is not, then you would favor not certifying those
camps?
News Conferences
645
Governor: Of course not. If they are not up to standards, they
ought not to be certified.
Penny: Governor, you have been making some speeches that
sound kind of like a taxpayer here recently on your quality edu-
cation program. For instance, I believe . . .
Governor: I have been a taxpayer for a long time [laughter] .
Penny: I know, but you are expressing some . . .
Governor: I represent the taxpayers.
Penny: . . . expressing some of the opinions of taxpayers, rather,
on a 40-hour week for teachers. Do you mean that they work
teaching 40 hours or that they are just on the school grounds or
in the schools 40 hours?
Governor: They couldn't teach very well for 40 hours and do a
good job. Most good teachers, the vast majority of good teachers,
in North Carolina, work much more than 40 hours a week. I
think any investigation of that would indicate to you that that
is so. What I am saying is this, that those few teachers who might
run over the children getting out when the last bell rings ought
to be made to understand that they have a responsibility to do a
full day's work and a full week's work and I hope that that will
be a policy across this state adopted by local boards that we are
talking about a minimum schedule when we talk about working
eight hours a day at school and working 40 hours a week. That
is the minimum any good teacher ought to do under our present
system and our present salary scales, and I think most of them
are now doing more than that. I am talking about those few
that haven't taken seriously enough their responsibilities.
Penny: Well, I understand in these additional state funds that
money has been provided to take some of the clerical work and
some of the other duties off the teachers which will free them
to do more teaching.
Governor: Well, I pointed out that if you didn't, to do more
teaching and to correct more papers so that they could give the
kind of examination that would better reflect the child's ability
instead of just giving a yes or no answer or multiple choice. I
think that educators generally agree that one reason that children
don't write better and compose better sentences is that too often
they don't have the opportunity to do that in schools because
they get away from the long, written answers because they simply
haven't had time always to grade that many papers. This is espe-
cially so in the English courses and the social studies. There
ought to be more writing, the educators think. Well, one of the
objectives in taking some of the paper work off of the teacher
646
Papers of Terry Sanford
was to give the teacher an opportunity to do a better job. My
point is this. Why take it off, if the teacher is not going to under-
stand that she must do much in addition to what she is now do-
ing. Don't take any work off the principal if he is just going to
sit in the office once that you have taken it off; and my statement
to the superintendents last night was that it is not enough to
relieve these people of the nonteaching duties, but let's go one
step further and see that they understand fully what they can
do now with that additional time.
Penny: What would you say the reaction of the superintendents
and teachers to these speeches is?
Governor: My impression is that the teachers and superintend-
ents and the principals and the school people, including the
school boards and the other people working with public educa-
tion, now have a higher morale than they've had in my observa-
tion over many years, that they are ready to go, that they see that
this is a challenge, that they understand that the burden of im-
proving schools is not on me or the General Assembly but on
them and that they take it very seriously, that they intend to do
their best.
Elliott: Have you had any indication that the filling of vacan-
cies in the teaching ranks has become easier in light of this pro-
gram?
Governor: Well, a good many superintendents have said so,
though I am sure that situation varies with different parts of the
state. I also made the point that I did not think we ought to fill
a vacancy simply because we had a vacancy to fill. That's not lim-
ited to the school system. It would apply to any other state de-
partment. Just because we have a position that can be filled; I
don't think we ought to fill it until we find the person that has
the proper qualifications, I would hope that, and I think this is
true, generally speaking, that the school people aren't going to
be too hasty in doing it. That they are going to adhere to high
standards and that the people who are put into these new jobs
will be people who can add to the quality of the program. I
would also say that I would hope that just because the state has
come in now and created new positions to lessen the teacher load
and ultimately to give the children more attention, the county
officials would not take this as a signal to decrease their appro-
priations. I think this has not been the case but in one or two
counties, but they defeat the whole purpose if they now diminish
the county contributions to the school program just because the
state has increased its attention to the school program and wher-
ever I find that, I would hope to discourage it. You know now.
News Conferences
647
a distressingly large number of our schools are not accredited by
the Southern Association. If we are going to reach accreditation,
we need not only to put this additional state effort in but we
need additional local effort. One of the things I want to talk
about this fall as I travel around the state is what do we need to
do to get our schools property accredited, not for the sake of
being accredited, but for the sake of the improvement of the
schools. Accreditation is merely a goal that helps us improve and
we are going to need additional effort, I have said all along, not
only from the teachers and the professionals, but from people
who give support at the county level as well as this wonderful
new support provided by the General Assembly. So, if it is going
to be done, all have got to increase their interests in assistance,
not decrease their efforts, if we are going to do all that I think
we can do.
Thank you.
APPOINTMENTS
APPOINTMENTS
This list includes only the appointments made by Governor Sanford during the
years of his administration 1961-1965. It does not contain all the persons who
served on the various boards, commissions, and other appointive agencies during
this period. These may be found in the North Carolina Manual, 1961 (pp. 275-330)
and the North Carolina Manual, 1963 (pp. 317-374) , issued by the Secretary of
State. The arrangement of the agencies here follows the order in which they
appear in the Manual.
An asterisk by a name indicates that the person was appointed and reappointed
by Governor Sanford. A dagger indicates appointment during a previous adminis-
tration and reappointment by Governor Sanford.
COUNCIL OF STATE
Editor's Note: Although the members of the Council of State are elected and not
appointed, it is appropriate that those who served in the major positions in the
Sanford administration be included here.
Governor
Terry Sanford
Lieutenant Governor - '
H. Cloyd Philpotti ' _
Secretary of State
Thad Eure
State Auditor v
Henry Lee Bridges
State Treasurer
Edwin Maurice Gill
Superintendent of Public Instructit
Charles Fisher Carroll
Attorney General
Thomas Wade Bruton
Commissioner of Agriculture
Lynton Yates Ballentine
James A. Graham ^
Commissioner of Labor
Frank Crane
Commissioner of Insurance
Charles Fortune Gold
Edwin Sidney Lanier ^ "
^ Deceased, Au.uust 19, 1961.
- Succeeded L. Y. Ballentine, deceuHed.
" Succeeded Charles Gold, deceased.
652
Papers of Terry Sanford
"3 XI,
S-i
O
o o
c
v
(-1 ^
>
o
> >
o o
too
•£ "5
'o
o c
qj <U
i-i
)-i *-i
or.
CS
QJ
CJ OJ
<
< <
^ c
•-5 ^
O ^
u o
— S-c
o o
u O u o
^ c ^ a
o ^
Qh
< C3
o ^
< C13
44_, O u-l O
S > i::^ >
^ ^ ^ ^
CO
PS
u
^ c
o o
^ c
Q X
«o «o
^ cfi
^ 50
«0 .A
[13 ^
O OJ
"I
y
u
CD
g s
O U
o «
O bX)
u o
UJ <U
S o
Q
c/3
Appointments
653
^ 2 ^
O u o
O y_ O
_ o _
a-
>^ >^ ^
3 3 3 3 3
S S g g e
< < < < <
W c3 ca
S-i !-( S-c (H
OJ Oj qj qj Qj
c c c c c
<U QJ l;
o o o o o
-a Td Td -a T3
c c c c c
w w w w w
> "o
C
O .
3§
U TO
V 00
^ CO
-1-1 CO
'St-'
-tJ CO
1-^
u oj
OS
si
< G
H ^
> 2 O
< <
W
o
O) 00
CM 00
■ csr CM
2 ^ ^ S o
g o o § -
^ l~l ^ Ol
5 n n ^ O
5 ^
H-1
^ ^ i-c
IS fi 3
2 •£ c ^-
J3 ^ . ii
ffi U ^ 4 ^
3 •+-,
s ^
si
..a
01 Q)
o ° .
eg cp <U OJ
O ft .-H
go >> rn 5 "
(U „ e ft = cy
g ft^g^ S5
O 0)
c
1^
S ^
S S s
no (u .s < S
5u
_ o
rt
s
s g
u n
^73
.« C *
2
o <u
o
rt t; '*-'0 "2
<5 ..2
g 0) "o O
>H c -2 t; «H 3 ^
to ^
U 2 rto
^-Si ^§ ft|
O M u a, O)
01 ..^
^ w
• ^ s|
CQ a»5t! rt
T3 TJ TJ
01 0) 0) Q<
73 73
O) 0) 0) 01
<u 01 01 01
y o o o
o o u o
P 3 3 3
654
Papers of Terry Sanford
EsesEsasesse
1/3 e/3 tn »5 c/3
S3
c/: t/3 c«
<<<<<<<<<<<<
cccccccccc
OOOOOOOOOO
i-^ i-M CO CO CO
TO
2S
CCCCCCCCCC -wC
4J C
cn c
C C
be be
CO CO CO
CM
<o o to
^•1
(O so CO CO
^ CO ^ 6 °°
OJC^/OOCO^— lOO-H-MOOOcO
5 'c
> o
in O
11
-r OS" ^ C
u
^ 1^ C ^ ^ Ph
, !T!
o j2
2 1-1
<
H ^•
O CO
z
W 5
.S
a-ffi-bf
CU C
s o /-; .
.^^ti-Q'^c-
•Si 6
c ^
6 S
to CO
to ^ to to
di CO ^
6 ^ <^
w 2 S c c
^ o c 2 2
5 1 5
? C *— i r-
BO CO
to CO CO to
^ to to
to ^ to —
C^f CO i>
to *>• 00 t>.
o I § i i
C -£5 ^ S
I
«
* o
PQ ^
I-
Appointments
655
to to to «o to
<;5 'B
to
CM , to to . ^
to CM ' oo to
6 ^ ^2 6
<M
00 (M *i
SJ.2
■tJ -t->
O 0)
8g
3 °
5'
13 9J O 9J C "J
«2 ■> ^ ■> bJ5'>
C oj uS (u c X!
5^5
^ * *
2U«
s ^
^ 6 6 3
St!
U O
ft
01 ft
O o fl,
ci! '= CIS
'I' .2 S . .
£ *i . g; CD M .
S 5
3 O
o "S
.
ft »-l -F^ Ol
|5 by-OTS-o
r c <u q; (U
O • J2 T3 T3
™ G 41 o) aj
-ceo
a; 0) (U
01 a> (u
a; <u
O O " O • ili K -2
7313 73'
(U (U 0)
73 TJ 73 '
O) Q> 0)
(u a>
www
ft
'^'O J? ft ."C^ o
J- pr p 3 3
J 01 <1> ft
3 73 73 3 g<(M '
; 0) 0) CO "
; <U 01
J o o K 2? t;
i CO w CO H _ I
3 s s s
.5 o
c
a> o
o 0)
ii >
a; 0)
ftJ5 •
3 4J CO
£Q 8
c
° H -
' . 5 ^
, CO "5 a
' o» ,-, .t;
• > CO tn
73 O J
1
O '3 • 0^
'O "3 'C "3 CO Co
o; o> 0) QJ ?c
73 73 T3 73 05 •-
QJ 0) Qi 0) ^
OJ 01 OJ 0>
o o o o 2 t-
3 3 3 3:^5
cococwcoHj^
s ?; g s ?
0) ^ 0) Oi
73 S 73-3
o; C 0) <U
0) tH) 0» 0^
o o o
o y o
3 «i 3 3
coWcoco
■a "3 73 73
gj 0) <u
a; 0» <u Q>
656
Papers of Terry Sanford
^ 2
(M CM CM
CO CO
CTi C5
C C C
O O O
<U <U OJ
'oj 'a;
a; oj oj
C C C
dj <u ^
ooo
d) D IV <U
o o o o
tlH 1^
o o o o
c c c c
U U u
4J OJ <U (U
> > > >
o o o o
be bC bC bC
<u <u <v <u
^ X
o o o o
(U (U (U <u
oj <u a; oj
'Eh'Eh'Hh'o-
<<<<
CO «r> «p
00
CM i>- cfi
-a
w
S c S
S 6 ^
bcx: 12
^ o
!^ t! c .
oj (u o r
Q c
^ ffi to SC
J>. t--
bc
i-i r; QJ
O
^ Pi ^ p<
o ^
e< Q w ^
(Jog
H
ITS «
o I
^ ^ ^ c» ob
CO so CO 0<p "-H 1— ( ^ ^
Oh 3
O
X O
- o
u .
^ i
i-i O
- .1.
O T3 ^ <U
2 5? O
h Q U
- i
-2 to
Appointments
657
CD CO CO CO
CO 00 cf) ^9
^ -71 CM CM
■-^ 00 00
^^5 S
O O f-
8
u u h
^ CO
o °o
U ^
CM
z
. ft "
O >>«o
.1 ^ oj
o
eg
e .
: 3 .
2 S
— o
. o
<u
^ s
O >> S
.2 s
o c
5!
C _ ft (U
>,U2 ^ cs
0, c
c -So;
+j «C jj' ^ "'S
.2 > 1-5
>^ 0) e o
tc s c
— tn o I' >
S S >
o' > s .5
c y2 o o <u
l-i I • ~ ft M
o ft 3
^ +^ O
+^ * O S OJ
•.£5U o g
< 0^ ^2
S 0 S
C «M g
^ "2 (u o g
o^--2 a o
-M o
=5
£?
. £§
'r :£ ^S"t3
^ O fcf. ^
£ 2 X V.
q; q; dJ o
>. <U j-
o O
o
ft .
ft y
be O !-i tc
C 13
-2 0
ft o
0^ B
to ftrH
£3 S
l|-s
X la's
.2 o ^
o *
^43 to
r2£
^ c;
e w
£ £3
oE-i
lajl
£15 £,
£ c
• ^ ^ ^ <i>
^ £ <u
0) -M C4
0) in C
o ^
<u o
CO flj
J? £
O ^ Q
(1) +e
P W CJ
>..5
o
ft X 01
£2 >
-Q to
£ ^ «
o
o g o .2 ^
CJ .
Co
to .►J rt
2 cfl rt C c,-
g J= cC
<u " q; ^ ?
^ o >.'~^
<U£C C .
J£2£"
2 S * i5
C ^ -t-> cfl
^ pU) ft
>.W to
I* S c
(U +J g ft
.£ £6-3
o o > .
ft 0) M
gvH CQOO
^to-S" .
O 01
C :
3 o
2^1 1
£ ^-oQ'-:^
o> c o c
o 2 2;
to >>^ <U *J
C ^ O 13 O!
o <u
CJ Qi <1»
2 .
bT CST3 +^ O
^ 0) ti to
£M.S^i^
- g 0;«M ^
0)
^>a)e^c3Coft
-rl 13 it I- S- K
era
O U3 -2 *J
01 —
3 ^ to O
U o . t« ft
? 0)
O to ■
o £ 5
<u — e T) ft-a *^ o
,-1; g .i: .i: o £ Eg a;
iiti S*^
„^^„^ ;2|S§° 0§^CW.
QwCJg^P3Srt me!a'HtoS^o ° >
JS '=><x> ££x Z2 M° «.Sc£'^.. ^ „
> to I > C > CJ Qj'-'^S O'-S O 0)
>5S
73 "
£
658
Papers of Terry Sanford
C-* CJ QJ GJ QJ QJ
>>>>>>>
o o o o o o o
bo bi; fac be be bc b^i
<3J
O O
<U <U QJ <U
> > > >
o c o o
be be be bc b£) be be
Qj aj Qj <Li oj aj
X x; ^ J3
o o o o o o o
QJ <U QJ QJ <U QJ QJ
Ui u ^ ^ i-^
2 :3 D a 3 :3 3
en t« C/5 WD C« C/3
CT3 CTJ
QJ CU <U QJ QJ ^
Oh Dh 0-4 CU 0-1 Clx CL
CO CO CO CO CO
CO CO CO GO CO
o o o o o o o
'% '$ '$ '%
<<<<<<■<
x> i>
<<<<<<<
o
(M CM (M CM CM
-C £ X XI X
_bc_be .bp.bp_bp
GJ U 'qj <Lj Qj qj QJ
rt p3 rt p3
Pi Pi Pi ^ Pi t^:.
[/3 1— I --^
. o
^ 2
— GO CO
CO ^ O t£i
to
CO CO i>- in
S be ■
cu (I c
rs O O
5
2 S
! c
... OJ
01 ~
us
W ftj CiJ
CO CO CO
CO to CO Tt^ Tf<
CO CO c?o r-.
o o o o o "7
S o 2 ^ S o-^
O 2i
. 3
; ^ I d o
o
CJ
CT3
^ g.;3
1.7
CO CO CO CO CO CO
c» 00 00
C C X X
g p S be" be
— ' 'uj > cu >
.S ^ 13 2i 15 c
c
o
s
< ^
o
« ^' ^ K
Q O ^ <u
t; . . ^ ;z:
U - C ^ ^ t
. S . . ^
C/3 J-) ^ V2 X
±3 beT3 ±; i S
^ w w S S
Appointments
659
o o
TfH TJH O
<D CO
•t>
m if5 lo
(O CO CD CO
l> !>• 1>-
co CO
S S 2
W3 iH W3
CSC
OJ Q (U
)-< ^
O
"IS
CO CO CO CO
<yi ^ ^
O (U (U ^
be
o
S-i
o
c c
03 O
<U tJD
O
O
to C
3 S.S
O Q,
m Ml —
> (1 ca
o 3.H
be a be
o
J3
o
>> o es
C "J >^
0) SjIS
CS
O u,
m 2
5E aj
o Jm
1 5
be F
-n't
0) o >-i
o
to
73 O «
a; <u
71 a. S
^ 0)
.5 c
P= S3 *
^ > ^.
be s ;
01
g-3
■ft
o
C w
5 c
£ be
5 2*
3
o —
5^ ^'
^ 0.2
0) <tH >-l
£ s
01 §
£^
5£-
o c/^ 0 E
3 .£
C 73 O
•-CP.
ft
|-ie;||«|&|.to
^ "
£S££
0)
£ 8
a £
£ o u
o <u
•H g O
bC^H^ . Q> „
. oj S -a 2 ^ E
Pi
t; P Pi 0»
0) 03 (U
I o
' P, b
^ ^ o
be
03
S£,
£ ^ <u a i- f«
p.?i£^ —
£2 . "rt O
S g c
C 0) 0)
PiO .a
01 to -M ^
P C
o P.+-
. 0. £
^ o
p^
.9 £
Pi-:: o
c£*
^£Qi.^'aj.2:2J;'c^ „ ^
,Ca)-M«3^^>-i tie'-^'Mbe w
,§||&x:4l|||-||i2.-2S|0Si
'^^v a.?^^^H<u'^^ST3'p^p£'csi'
,ss§g-^ssg^l'^g^...ip"Ig-"£
^ ^ eo 01
r; c 00 ,5
660
Papers of Terry Sanford
CO
CO CO CO ^
o
■a.
so
bc ^ O
O io
X TJ
t ^>
a Qj cs
"rt ^ F, b 15 13
< 2
0 a;
1 g
SI
fa£) .
2 - o o
^ O 3
o .
T3
C i-i
-a !-.
o o
o
DC c
o
Si o
2 J
OJ >-i
^ t: o
i- C -b
a >— 1 • o
: n 3
" ! «^ o
Jp X
^ fQ
* Q
S/ C/5 C/3
03 11! 'u
5 C3 re
u <
a: S
h J DC w u u
S ^ -
5 o t-
5^ 03 O
S U O
Appointments
661
o o o
c c c
aj Qj oj Qj oj
> > > > >
o o o o o
bO b£) tJC be bo
o o o o o
<u (U QJ o o
U U U U U
3 3 3 3 3
t« W2 c« IZ!
a ri a ci d
OJ (U 5J CJ
<•<<<•<
lO m lo lO m ID
CO to O to to
to yp to (O <o
§ lO XT) lO
2; c\r csr csf
O
<
B O S O C J5
< pD X! OJ W
2 2 3 ^
O Oh
c !
o i
« ^ = 5r
— I 3 a; <u
(U 3 )S izi
> <^ -5 r;;
= £ - "2
3 ^ = ^
3 x: o o o
i-i be be ^ i-i '-I
Oj .S^.^' o o o
33 X! X2
<U o o o
Z ; i O O O
^ . 3 ^
a; 2 re S ^
o o -kt: ~ .ii C :r *- ^
c ^ O to
o C" >>
s E 2; ^
E c 5
O o
o
> g cs
T3 S
0) .2 - M
0)
0)
0) 0) tJ
0) >> 3
P W O «
_ " 0) bi .
£ . >
o cii o
f.2
^^.-^
o i £ ca o
^.-^ rtc/^
x> u t-''a .
S it 2 cs o .
0- i <u S • ^
S o
«H ^ CO C
o . o; m
£il|
ft . oQ
(U . C'O
^ V- 0) C
+j o g ri
.H ^« >i
S O) in O
o u .
I'
o ft'-S ^
E -c o . .52
«j 5E
O «
. S 'V
>> ^ S 5i S
. C 0) "-I
^ ^ 5 E
0) cs tc « j:^
o £ c*^
o .
03 0) "
a E ^
3 E !«<3" 5
0) „o
O a, oj S c o 5
g O 0) 1^ 0) 01 0)
£3 .,333
g 3 j= - c
-^^^Se -
.g^^^-Ed
T3 TJ T3 XJ TJ a5
a)(i;(i;a)Qja>o)S
0)4)0)0)0)0)0)2
■ 3 O
0) 0) t. <<
o.:: t> •-^s^Xi^ 0)^ c«
^^I^HE'Sg^^
^ 3 ■ ? - ^
•Cj''-(iiMCc 0)™
73 -a -a ci >,
Q) 0) 01 - ■ '
Qj qi Qi
ts £ o
O O CJ
3333333 r7;f75r7
o S o ^ ^ o
>. a; 0)
n >i " ,£5 "O ^
_j c 0) o; cu
O 0; S S
^ c 3 3
S§1
662
Papers of Terry Sanford
Tt^ ^
CM CM CM
m lo
OO CO 00 00
CO CO CO
i>- i>-
eo
CO
«p
CO
^ — ^ CO CO
coco^cococococo
oo^c>J>-^co(i
CO
CO
cip
CO
CO
CO
6
<
pa
b
O
a: r-
0 aj
1 ^
O
u
j3 ij C O CJ c C
bo « i:^ o
3J ^ ^ X3 > cfl
c
« g
.2 3.
'I ^
S -a
>-
> OJ
> wo
C c/--
o "S
O o
S 2
o
2 ^
u
3
3, ^
U ST
n "5 —
2 H 5
^0^5 W W J Oh
« CO CO CO CO
CO CO CO CO ^
^ t-^ CM
S S ^ 2 n::
> x: XI b£ >
OJ i-( >-H c
i 3 3 tr:
« Q Q e ^
c pa t:
, • 2 o ^
. ^ X ^•
c -r: ^ ^ o
X Cl. ^<
^ CO CO CO
— CO CO CO _L _L _L
X>. 00 00 CO r-(
^ (U QJ C
fac3: i;
PC t« c
< u 2
° 2 E 2
0 o ij
Z OJ c
2 U
Appointments
663
CO CO CO CO CO
!>.
«3 to CO CO CO
4 4 ^ ^ CO
Cvf CNf TJH — I ^
_ ^ ^ 00 00
o .Si .2 .be
be
3
OJ U !^ ^
a? CQ ''^ C
■ £5
■ ^ o
' tj to
as C
0) c o
5 o ° -
<U CO K ••
r (u 0)
S.S .5
O CO
-|^-
c "5 c 1!
<V 0) A
§:g -
°
CMC
T3
-2 >> 5
c 3 -o -
OSES
p, oj 01 ^
^|S43
03
- 5
J" >" S y
5 c c
<U 0) O cij .
0)
X ;h a;
^ c S.
' o •< ?
a; t: C
Xi o o
O CO
O 1" (1)
O CO
^9 b
0, > e9
5;=
S Bj=
Is °
Cq o
+-> •
; s-g
I ^ +J
2 o
(u a) ^
0^ <4H
s °
0) 5
0) 01 be
j2 CO Cfl c
o3 . O
cS 01 £0
0- c
O; CO -C
o o -c 5
sf?i
o o p
o a;
C 01 3 c
iri >
' O o .
5 't3
03 x: -M CO
0) O +^ !h
-MO o •-
ft-^ OI.S 03
S „"?
, s
_ 3
ft J;
<u o P
S
S22
J3 03
. « a;
13 r; 03
!2 C oj
.03 ^ _ C CO .
S Sj-S « S
a CO
V 03
C S ^ 1
O 0) C c <
y c ? ^
C fcj)
C 03,
01 y
C'^o^ o!
IS
Ph" CO
- 4J O OJ
• '5 'o 02 ^
o a ° w £
*^ ^coHm q3 3 01
o o g.r^ S c § 1 c^^W
s.
01 5
T3 T3 T3 T3 -r
' 01 01 01 01 0) 0)
0) 01 01 OJ 01 0)
664
I
■Oh
•S
o
Papers of Terry Sanford
C5 CT) CT) .C~' O C~. CJ~> c' Cr' a: C~' ~ C> CT- o CTi § C"-
s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s ^.g s
CTi O^' CTi C CT' C"; 0~i O"- C~. C~- C^- C- c. Q"' O^- O C7> C-
mmmmmm
2222£2£££2£22S222S2222
lllllllllllllllllllllla
caj a; ffi e«J p!i z
oj Tt" -rf !^
CM C^I C^J C^X C>J C^J C>X C\t OX C^l CM CM (M CM CM CO (O CO £2 <>J CM (>X (M CM
OtOcOC-JOOCOCOcOCOCOCCCOCOCOtOcOCOcO', ',' "5 (0<0«OtOtO
i i
II
^ ^ §
Appointments
665
'H- "a, 'g. 'Hh 'a, "a, 'a, "a, "Eh
esesessge
poooooooo
333333333
c c c
3 3 3
c c c c c c
3 3 3 3 3 3
>>>>>>>^>
HH .iS^ o --^
^ ^ ^ X, Xi > <u 1^
• ljJ33<uaJf3^
O bc "-^ 2
o .
O O
V3
5 C
w ^ )^ 3 5 ^
^cq 0. ffi S h O
z ^^^^^^^^
2 (MCNrCMCMCNrc^JCMiM
b o ii: ^ o
2 o ^ E hh
ti EP-^
^ =^ ^ 1j ^ '^^ -o
! U
- 0
3 O
V3 >
w Q
-f-eq
cq o
^ 5 bo bcDC
«5 Q .5 .S .
- 'S ^
" c - t 2
o ^ ^ £ S
_W .T- t-
'm ^
C cn
O T3 0)
p « '-^
0 O <o
in •
.-I e
S 03
.S J=
-O C
01 tH ?j
J= o
.52
^ Sot
g>
5 O c
O Oi'-'
S HI
C ^
0) 01 o
^ 2 C
0^ bl
01
° p.
C 0)
C r" ti
c3 o
6-§
01
^ -a
o c
be
B a;
o o
S 2
01 ^
O 0)
5 u
ft tu
So
Q> 0,
ft£
ft o
ft
fti-H *^
lid
a; bfi . o
O C >. ca
C £ o
«J 0)
oj o5,X5 £
01 c
T'^ ft
o « o
ft
c Sua
> eS ^
o ft
Q o>
« .2
ft;5 tn
CO «
2S -
- 05 '-I
O to «o
0> ^
CO
o o ft^
[« 0) 0) u
S SQ '
o *3 »o
£-^ .
0, -
J- oj'-'o
-a CO
.go a>
11=1
111=
s
, ft
p tn
be es
H „
CO £
-So,
T3 C tn
0) 0) 0) 01 C •
■O T3 B O t-
O 01 OJ O "5
WOO .
3 3 O u
r-l 0)
£
Is. ^gsE» fills
11
o o
^aj-2t3 .Bo)a)(uo)
>,0'0'a'53'O
— a3?^<Uo)30 (DO^O;*
ci3,c^o*^+jajoooo
Z-^^C«S;0 0,OTr-0000
■fl B 330: "•r'is 3 3 3 3
H J c c« GO <1 a, w ifimmm
^" > 0< ^
666
Papers of Terry Sanford
CO GO CO GO
21 21 !il !il S i si 2i
to up to
00 00 00
l>f (>f (>f
o
^ c o
^ c S
u Jo
o ^
bb">
! I
o
c ^
2 ^
2 i O S C
?? 2 J s
• -a J i< (J
,S iIh Q psi
•n o
S 2
O W
5^ =
o :n
J« c c c o
:H o ti t; o o g
bc-S be bc^ «
5 .S g ^ .S .£ 15 ^
c c c
.-5 ^ O :5 c«
-*^bc
5 V
rt ^
OUE
O
e^i S S S ^
> bc
Z 3
-J 9
o hJ
as
<
U
peg
I 2 2
CA) C/5
Appointments
667
HJ OJ OJ <u
> > > >
o o o o
bc bJO be be
o o o o
Qj oj a; oj
3
3 3 3
IT) «D 1/3
(U
a Oh D-
< < < <
— -^(OCDCOTti-itiiO
05 obobcncfiOscTicn^
2 g3 5:: ^ bo
n '4J 3 ^ >^'2
c/3
3
O
O U
■ 5
s5
1 26
aj ifl cj
e<
o
c
° C o
S
so GO CO
^ «0 to
00 00 00 00
3 ^ ^ S
be
si
o
"3 2 ^ S +J
c o
s >■
Il
03
CO C
U2
u S in
o +^ "5
u ft
o 0) r
CO
a p. .
9
(U lU (U
ea+3 o
8 >..S2
o 5? P
^ M S
Wo
o
^ c o
^ « 5
m >>
(u<3
t3 .
tC to
0) (U
a c
>. S o .S" S P b
^ C a; >. .
O O
£ 0) cd
flj X M
X 5 °
0* E s
0) o
y til
"5 £
O O
W .Si
£rt
u o
u o <u
0) _> CO ;
> "c «>
c
o A
TO 0) O 'J^
CD flj -M ^ .
£Q o 3 C
01 D'H'^ c-^ cS
O O 41
^3 T3 T) '5! T3 T3
<U 0) (U a; 41
4) <U 01 S ll> 01
4) a» 0) r 01 <u
o o o o a
o o o " o o
S 5 3 s s
o
So
-fc ..-g ^ffi c S C
to O
OJ to ■
£ S
£ ^
4)
•1
"3 t^i
tc
1^'
„ s
£
to i;
to *^
fiH -I 73
S £ Sf-fi S a c 'S " «4 -
04» '^'5— T^-n,
--oc-S-a-af cs :S s- ~ T3 "73 -o -5
3^^Ji£^ii§ic-M'^- -^^^''
a! c3 ^
T3
£5 -
O ^ C T3 hi
o. rtPQ«2 Pi's 3
668
Papers of Terry Sanford
o o o o o
£2 C C d C
}^ }^ u u u
OJ QJ 4J CJ
> > > > >
o o o o o
b£) bO bO be bC
o o o o o
U U 9J flJ QJ
;h i-i Ih ;-i i-c
3 3 S 3 3
t/: cn «i W2 c«
P3
[l^ <U <U U V <U
Oh CU CLi CU
< < < < <
2 CO CO GO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO
S O^^^CD^^O CO^CO<0 COCOCOCOCO^OCOOOOCOCOCO
'^■©H o6c»o6ooo6 ^ c^rc^^c^xc^c^r?ic^fc^l^^c^xc^^c^fc^ic^^c^rc^^c^rc^^c^^cv^«i«oco^
T?; ^^^^^ y ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ „ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
W ^ K
Si
u
3
<n JO
O ffi £
c -bb ^ ?P 2 S
i2 o
o
I- r2 ^ ,£3
5 -j: 5 s ^ Is ®
^ 2 ?^ <u
# K "-I
C 53 *j
s ^^^^
^1 ffi
* ^
. .'^
s-i C
P3
bC
C
,bJDp3
3
-^1
S 3 U
bO^J
■J ss
o u
3 S
J3 3
bO O
-3 3 <u t)
3
G u bc
^ t:
3 V2
(J <u 3
<u "
PL, 3 .
^< 3
^ 2
C3 1
8
M 3-5*
S s t: ^
bc*
^ Q ^ ^
P^ O S ^ ^
Appointments
669
h n ■
eS V a
^j: ft
o « o
^ ^
u c w
o) 5 cj r:^
o o r
^"^ £^
- S c
O u-i
0|
2 ^ 2a1
g ^ .s ^ ^ a
•p
o
3 c)^
f3 <y
M
5 s
CS in
c
C OJ £^
a; .
< J u
5! bo
^ > Si
<u >
o o
Oi! J W
i) o a
M f <U
.ri to
i a>
^^^^^^^^^^^ Sc
^ Csf CM Cvj CvJ Cvf CM CNI C>l ggi
U 1^^ !>. X>. !>. X>. !>. J>. i>. -fi '
o
s so
.2Q
- S O CO
O 41
to ft 0)
C «3 tn -O
° i
tc (U C5 O
P- o „• «J
2<2 «, S
S
C S +^
+j o 2
CO ft-
c ft
o <u a
S o o* «
3 (11 r-
bfl o
to V
^ft^
O m
oj 3 o a'
ft M S u
< «rm w
S S.2
>> c
(- > o
<i> i! f^y-i
1 1-1 « i>
S ^ cd "2
5:5 S 2 .
13 S ^ T3 73
3 ft 3 3 j3
S g - f3 s
J 73 73 T3 13
> 01 o V 01
I'D 13 73-0
> « 0) (U 4)
I o> 0) a> 01
> y o u u
I « y w o
13 3 3 3
<u iS ^ o
.S.Si?3.2
. ^ £ °| ^
2 W3 CS <*-! 01
A <i) u o <a ^
N C 0) «3
•« 5 C 52 E c
« S ft
gS^-^ ft
Cj o 0) >^ _
3 3 J3 ^2 <U .
s s s t.
g tn g r O
2 0) 2 ^ MX
0)0*OJOJO)0^0>0>OJ
73'^'^73'^'73n3T3-n
0>0^0>0)0>0JOO0J
O'OJO'OJO'Q^O'QO
yowwyoooo
333333333
670
Papers of Terry Sanford
> >
o o
bc bo
o o
> >
3; §0
CJ QJ QJ flJ CJ
J3 J3 ^ -C X3
oooooooooooooooooooo
3 3
to W5
< <
o o o o o o
Qj 5j Qj 4j U qj
Ih ^ ^ ;-c M ;-i
3
3 3
(U u
3 3 3
M C/3 CA
CTj
OJ <U lU lU
Oh Oh CL CL, 0-, CU
<<<<<<
CO on
111.1 ' ^
,— l^^-H^P-^i-Hl— I,— I,— I— t— 1^^.— 1^,— i^co.iDt^
|g C5 CO
Oh 1— I I>
O
Q
5
T3
(J C -
^ o * ^
g- S C ^
^ C
V3 i-1
(LI
O
U h
■2 fL, c«
OJ
> Q
o
2^ 7? 5 >-i *
o
^ O - ■ ^
^ g Oh " .S S
C ^ S ^ C ^
Qj -O o o [jj ^
= -^H ^ d £
8.^
^ r-H ^ CO CM
«0 CO CO ^ «o
^ cfi CT) CM d> ^
CM CM CM CO
CO 00 00 —I CO lf>
H
M
Ph
Q g
C l-l HI
i ^ dj fli 2 '-'
I < pi flj t)
I ^ ^ e«
I s s s-J-i
<<
8
1 O
^ 3 »
3 ^ pq >-5 c«
dj o s
Appointments
671
qj(U3jajajQJQJCJ<U
>>>>>>>>>
OOOOOOOOO
bOtuobobObcbCbObCbO
S4
(0 04
CI
I-:
OOOOOOOOO
DhOhCCIhCIiCuO-iOhO-.
■<<■<<"<■<<<<
r~
■3 r
1^
Id
H ;o «D oc
o «b «b yb ^
if>o6i-HOOiO«5eoif5«b Z 06060606
c _ _ a
S-i l-i S-c
i <u <u ^ _ _
^ C C 3 C ^ C
^^^^^
^ ^ ^ ^ 03 ^
J M i-i !-i J
03 03
Ph ^
03
bC^
03 ^
b "-1
U
W
OS
O
U
b
O
§
<
o
03 ►-^ 03 qj X3 ^
O h-i ^ > a. W
^ |C W
1
i"5 S
' u o
^ o
be
CO a*
lit
™Q ft
. 2i
>> 0)
4^ c
" ^: <u
3 ca c
Q Hi —
• O cS
ft S
0) Q) -
0^0
C§ >, O
O 5;
CO M
^ J ^
£ cfl
Si
-55;
■2
s|
X «
i1
•S c
ft 0,
ft^
0) a> 01
0) V (V
000
OJ lU O (1) o
• T3 T3 73 73 -a -a TD
a> 4> V 0) i> v 01
^ 73 T3 73 73 13
13 73 73
0) a> a>
-TJ T3
oj a> 0^
3 3 p 3 3 3 3^ 3
W CO m W M M M H W i
C3333333
O 03 OJ W M tZ! M M !
01 ^ a, ,
: 3;C
672
Papers op Terry Sanford
o o
c c
>>>>>>>>>>>
ooooooooooo__
bJDbcbCbCbObiDbiDbObObCifaobCbC
> >
o o
"3 -O,
ooooooooooooo
p I p , 2^ Oh Ph CIh CU Qh Q-( Oh Oh
<<<<<<<<<<<<<
St
OO 00
00 00
C 3
o
1^ i ^ 1^
O <u
tirtC ct>ciuc-:<ij3;coo<u
- ^ 3 .5 -3 <u 2
X ^ "^^ J2
D <n o
El
to '^^^ '^^^
s ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
o
u
^ -3 3 c C .22 .i3 .tJ
° , oj OJ OJ 3 (J
2r ^
r- 1 <U •~
2 ' .5 C
^ S U S K P
P3
(U 3
O
o
Appointments
673
(i u ^
>>>>>>>>>>>>
oooooooooooo
bObCtJDbCbCbCbCbObCbCfcJDbc
OOOOOOOOOOOO
'Eh'Hh'Hh'Hh a,'HH'HH'H,'H.'H,'HH'H-
■<<•<<■<■<<<<■<<<
Tt^ Tt^ Tt^ TJH tJH TJ^ T^" TjH
> >
qj -
a=S33'^'^SS^
'Miis I s § §Q
CT) C/D c/5
o o
o 2
I-
u O
faO ^
c
Is
g *H O > w
3 <u o • >-<
o ^
to «0 O OO CO
I ' o CO
CO CO CO I I
^ ^ lO XO
^ TfH TfH !>. !>.
eq "rt ^ < c
c 3 2
5^
3 3 3
S S 6 ^
OJ <U OJ
tAi t/^ c^j (U
(/2 izi c/5 hi
<<< I
C 3
c« '--^ O OJ .
(U
C
o o o
CO CO CO
CO <o <o
d
BJ H ^ ^
w c/:)
w w o o o
[J H i_ (_,
a o o o
(l4
O
U
« J
SO ,
W O CO CO CO
^5666
|0
< o
S 5
5g
3 t
■O J3
CQ W
c <"
0)
0) ^
5 S
a;
«M tn
(U ?> 05
-c c ^
.2 " Q
^ M
0) ^
3 ->-' j=
J! "3
n c
0) a 01
;^ s o
135
o c
3 5 >
tj 0) C
ft O C!3 ,
£ 0) 0) ■
0)
« £
>> a; c
T3 0.2
I ^1
^ cc
£
0 , o
£ %h
0,-Q
- IS
-!-> ft -U
.2
£ 0
O J3
c £
CO c« •
^ " g »^
5 '-'
(U o ^ +^
£ j=
^ £
o pq
^ £
<u 9
3
I a*
£ J3
o So
£
o .
-IS
S £
. n- 01) 55 q;
^.S ft^"
T3 t3 J3
J ft
Q m .2 H
S ? £ g
IIS
2^ 3
^ 0),
674
Papers op Terry Sanford
CO CO ^ ^
OJ <U OJ
> > >
o o o
bD bo bo
(U OJ (U
xi Si
0 0 0
<u <u dj
u u u
3 3 3
(/3 izi lyj
(U (U (U
<<<
o
■a,
CM CM Tti
— I— ^(M'— I0OCO0OO5"— i«M
CT) !>■
■'^ i i o E 5
C V3
cj t; t: :^ i3
c
g . Si.Si C C ^ 0^
o « Q 5 r-^ i o
O — h-i • — '
. . "i^ CL, 3 c (-1
O l-^ 00 o
z ^ jq _
oS bo^ bc--^
b Pi r/
u
. o
^ — (M
1— li— 11— ir— li— (OOCOCT)
ooo6obobobiot~^co HOicfiCT)
— ^ O ^ w
03 > c ^ .t:
o o
J5 J5
u u <
bO O £ S3 S
3 ^% ^ •
1-1 V* J ~
X! C >
O 03 J;- . • -
Q Q ^ ►^U ^ K
Appointments
675
o o o o
c c c c
>>>>
OoOO----____--
bCbCbObOfaCbObObObCbObObobObC
>>>>>>>>>>
oooooooooo
00660000000
C^C/3C/3C/3C/DUOC/DS/3C/3C/3C/3
OliCuOhCXOhOhCLiCXC^O-iCLiOhQhOh
0 0 0
<u <v <v
i-i U i-i
3 3 3
to IZl (/3
aj (u (u
o U
<u
Is
0) $H
o
1*3
Is
V
O
,0 tn
P.
a> -(->
<<<<<<<<<<<<<< go;
"^^^
A >r-ti c o ^-a 4;
^o§So33o:^iiii
T3
o c
G C IJ c -C
o £ tj O bC
C c/2 ^ (U 03
c =1
O 3
0^ tin O
c
II
0,0
o S"
^3
J3 0)
"S H
o <u
O
£0'
■5 9
o CO
o --^
=: o -
CO CO
-« o S'
"2 n,
O J
§
" c °
S o S
.2 S
.5 aj
« o
i"^ •< J
low
3 3
^ O tn
^ S-i !-<
C J2 .
> 5> t:
O g 3
. "S '53
c c
eS ^ C
>. o
IS w cq ^ < H^U ^CQ
TJ'Ti'O'O'aTJ'a 2i
o o -a '
M <u
a!
2 o •n -a
B 3 C
a.si
?. OB S
^3 £ c ^
J 5 g a»
MJ" S M
- m tn <U
S S.+i
to >•£ 5
73 0) a
- s >
O cfl
'S
T3 73 -a w -- ^
(U (U <V CD ^ u
(1) Qj q; ^ S-H
E-t T3 *^
o y u o o 0
3 3 3 3 3 3
^ i I s i i
o 5; o u u
3 ;C ft 3 3
676
Papers of Terry Sanford
<3 -O,
o o o
c c c
ooooooooo
cccccc:ccc
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
ppoppoooooooooooooopoooooo
006000000000
^S-c(-i!-iS-<;-c)-H!-i!-ii-(S-iS-.
333333333333
OOOOOOOOOOOOOO
3333333333
CJ CJ S
<<<<<<<<<<■<<<<<<<<■<<■<<<
o o o O O o
CO CO CO GO CO GO
CO CO to CO O ;o
II
^ s V r , , , , ^
!>.
■1
o
o
1- 3 ^^3:ii o--' fac^
rs c^S if c/5 "
P«i P'i c
c
e^i 5^
T3 <u ^
o — Si
° 3 3
<^ 3
^ Si 2 ^ ^ _c
O "nj 3h ■> 'qj _n o O <; "> '> O wfjE 'qj ^
T:-3Ph a; — -t^ii^ilH iJCT;c '^S*^
o
C/3
3
2 ^- ^ £
[ii < cl, H
c
3 £
3
3
V.
O
Mill
U 3
3
U
o
I ^ n ^ • - ^ O ^
,2, . ^
3 > .B^
i:;hc^oc«^^rr;^ ^ s
OJ ^JS'^s-'O^'-'S ootu
OJ O 3
3 i-i 3
° P ^ ^ j3 <u
c3 3 3 3 j5
-c: Q Q P5
3
^ O
* * 3 * ij
^ .2 ^
* > 3 S nj
2 ° £ ^ S .
pq c S c ^
Appointments
677
OOOoOOOoOooOOOO
I till CO CO
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^ cx) 00
«p to to yp
01 m <u
u V e
i p ^
>
Ml
O 09
s
s
o
b 2
s
-a
p.
S w w
(U ?^ u
a V
S CO
o .
^ ■ c
-I"
o
o
C Si
J— .n ^
iH w 1« 1:5 "t? „
^ O O ^
o
U x;
U
*
■ c
o
C >-< ^
<£ ^i. ^5 > u
u
-CI ^ 1^ c c p
•in hH i-i o
O ^5 3 I 2^
C J2
OJ o
S 0. ^ ^ ^
, U
■S 3
^ < J .^5 S S
It
o
c
O u 2 3 ^
j2 « I ^' w J H
^ I e I- S - -
OJJS O (H fH
u c3
O Q) 3
uj I- .
GXi O y
^ u <u
OJ O C 50
3) "<H O ^
s .
!-i is CO
^ 00
^ a; .IM
>> 5m
to 5
o
CO
fS <u ^
a3 S S •'
e O C
U . 23 -M .
IH c C3
2 OX!
a; ^
c .2
'c o o
c3 O bJ) >
tuO ^
O £fl J3 O
c oi
03 pC .
73 -o -a •
01 (u a>
^3 T! XJ '
01 01 a>
0) <U 01
C ft
5 g
So
01 ' O
<u bi)
o tuO '
"tn O c
C C 0) Q
3 3 3
o t- 5 <
.2 " »
g (U 01
O .
y (h (u 0)
£13 0) O;
0) y o
2 >. w o
W H *
B >
I c3
H a> c 3f
u 0^ >
I' 'C pa 5
•73 -O TJ
a> o; V «
73 13 TJ TJ
oj (u o> 9
01 0) V u
u o y t)
o o o o
3 3 3 3
678
Papers of Terry Sanford
0-2
.5
oo GO in
O CO
CO CO
m m IT) lO m xf5
u
z
O ^
U ^
CO
>
oj
"O -7- O
'-'be
OJ cfl c
< u E
u « ^
< CO
W 00
O
O
U
o
u
u
< ^
CO CO to
•4* TtH cfi
T T' ^
i>« !>. u:^
.-5S
C «3 ^
COCOCOCOtOCOtDCO
3
^
U
ho O
O >5 <U
^ CXI
u
'5J P3
^ c ^ S
s ^ ^ s
o o « o
. o
c oj ^
S J O Q CQ
R! si
U O c«
Oh
(J? u
Appointments
679
II
o >
O CS
a' S
b <^ u
^3
ft
i S 2
u C
> CIS •
o
bo 01
-s's
s
O OJ
ftj= c
ago
?
O +-■
^-^^
'CI tn
5^ £
TJ So
D C« qJ
O 9J
(U ^
O
o
"He
h§
oooooooooooooooo
- C c/3
uj CL ^ c!;
'qj HM
i XI
i I ^
S DC -
^ S ^ a o
• -5 o o .
o
o u
S
3
C 73
«1
0) Si
>> ft
= 1
ft ft
oi ft
«4H O pi
a> S 5
^ a; CS
o Q
«3 O"
LJ a* _
' i; ° c
Co oj
0) CO "
O i
a; . c
b ~ ^
«2 2-? c ft
£ S o
73 S K ^3 2
<D > g oJ ^
o . rt .22 q; c o
EC fto
5 SeJ
tfl +j CO
i ° i
cO
m <u S
l^^cs _
g 15 0) 73
<U O c <U
G ;g o c
O
c3
C C
— CS
o u
cS (C
ft^^
«4H
«! g §
- 3 ca
«H ~ O
fl) cs 73 r
3 tn.S
ft O M • -
?I CO <M
-
.2 <^
o .
C CS
tri u
1°
J2 C 3^
b >■
po > (u
C O (1)
^ ^ ^'S "cS
CO
.52 "3 («" c § ^
fti S go
3 01
^ c3 C !-<"
, 0~ q
CS 0)
s-iU-«'acg»-'73oJ3
WH g_MO csH ^
O tC > eS
S 12 o
350
>H cS cS CO
TJ T3 73 '2
..;S-cs^c^
Siz; .0 . ft-^ ftcD
cn<U-'>-gjj2=«^
"^5 csSnS^ S
o :S ?J ^- c
1 CO
CS g ft m
T3 -O 73
aj (U (U
<u 0) <u
-Q 73
>,a)73T:7373 o 2 C-T
01 <U 01 01 r, !h to
a; CS
21
3x:a^g3333« "S^w
*■ - 3 .
73 C J —
O 0) to 03
3 £ S3
t- OS u C
680
Papers of Terry Sanford
in t~~
CO CO
CO
oo
to
CO
in
CO
in
CO
in
CO
in
CO
in
CO
in
CO
inininminininininmininin
cococococococococococococo
CO
CO
CO
CO
o o o
oo oo oc
6
CO
o
oo
o
oo
o
oo
o
CO
O
oo
6
oo
o
oo
o
CO
ooooooooooooo
ooooooooooGocooooooooooooo
6
oo
6
CO
yb CO CO
CO
(O
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
cocococococococo^Ococo^co
CO
CO
CO — '
oo
^ CO
CO • c\r
"r^— i^^^^-^^p-H^^^-Hr-H^^-H^cMcci-*'
^COCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCO 'CO 04 CNT CO
^cf. ^ Jh ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ «? 6
COCV|--H,-H^^.-IP-H^^^r-H^^^r--,^--,P-H^^^ ^ ^
c^inir^i>«i^r^i>.i>.i>.i^.irl.£^jr^t^r^iAr^i>.r^ j>. Tt< i>.
Qj a a
^ (U
>^
O o
.5?= o ;^ 2 2 S S
o
00 <U !
* S s
o ^
^ ^ CQ
' C Oh -
^ Td ^
2 §
" O
> M
1) - -
'3^
o pi
O
C <u <u
o ^ :i
O u
3 OJ
' ITS D
o
;:: y
Q <
3 5
3S
•►r c^
o
-O W .S
>^ CU
C ^
£ X5
1
B
o
^ <
-35 3 ;>
S S ^
^ d
J 2<
O w
o
§ 5
^ 8^
J2 <-> t-l L-
c
• w ^
Appointments
681
^,(_(_!_i_^;-ii-,i_^-i_i_^s-ii-((-(S-ii-(;-i
ooooooooooooooooooo
cccccccGccccccccccc;
ooooooooooooooooooo
'o'o'o'o'o'o'o'o'o'o'o'o'o'o'c'o'o'o'o
'Eh "E^ "Hh 'Bh 'oh 'E. "E. "Hh 3h "a. 'Hh 'Hh 'H. 'Hh "H. "Hh 'H. 'H^
<<<<■<■<<<•<■<<•<-<<<<■<<<
to to ?o to to
^JH
»rj in »n m ifi
03 OJ C C J3
O O ^
C h > W ;C
O
U 03
•5 i^^^
g u
I* 8 s
^ • ■
W N c« («
O o 23
. I-H O
h
QJ
S-H lyj izi
< ^ ^
2 g
u w
c -a
c3 A
!/3 C/2 C/3
a; ^- (U
O ^ ^
J S h ^ d
.-Q . O •
C« C/3 _S IZ)
i_ S_
JS'^-g a; ^
6
OjS ^ . § 3
«n s- ?H c tfl
P» tn C i
u S £ ^
_g go C o
>. s - > ^*
-a ^ -£ 25 a
S ft cs c
o c "IJ cu
ft r
0) g ^ c .i; n,
S ^ o [2:5
«H Si 0) O 0) > I
^ <u 73 (U ^ CO
+^ ^ C ^ cS -
.2 S •
%^ %
ft ^
>. o
2
0)
o .
So. .
<! <u ^
C g CO
^ T, -S CO
C a; (1, a> c/j .2- o <M
M ^ ^ ft o
, ^^^^ a;^_^2
o S
o
ft to
ft
! Q "5
- o
. <U
^ i£ '■^
g-^
C _, M "ti i3
O c3 0) C T3 ,-( '
,V3 -
Si a> 0) ,
3 o 0^ i= S '
9 o T3 „ a* 5* o kT
J 01 " ^ 0) CO
JO . J3 O to w
£ ^ ,c
"oi e CO*
CO . C
.2 S c S
C T3 O -
_ - o
(DOC
q; 0) ^
OS
3 3 3-C
■5 T3
01 O 01
— n3
^ (U Q> (U
S (U QJ «
TO y y y
U y «
co" S 3 3
682
Papers of Terry Sanford
o o
C G
> >
o o
bC biD
o o
c c
o o
c c
>>> -^-^
P p p o
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
pppppppppppppp
p p p p
c c c c
i-l u ^ ^
(U <U QJ UJ
> > > >
P P P P
P P
bObObObcbcbCbCbcbiDbiDbcbObcbObCbCbCbCbcbCtJDbcfacbCbcfacbObcfc^
P P
(LI (U
\-l S-H
3 3
1/3
a,
PPPOPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
4JQJU<UQJ(U9JQJQJOjajQJQJQJCJ(3J<U<3J<UQJ
3 3
i-ii-(M^M)-i)-i)-ii-i^i-()->^^)-i^^^)-i)-i^^s-i!-i;-(i-i;-i»-iS-i
33333333333333333333333333333
•<"<<><-<<<<<-<-<-<<<<<<<
in in
in in
c^ic^csrcsrcvjc^rc^rcstc^(M(>j(>ic>jCMooocoooooooooocooooooooooooooo
o ^
c B o
Boo
c
u i I-i
-o _2
boo.tiP^;::: g bo^ g « oP PPPPP.5oPP.bf)P*jP
2^
bJO
c
Q
s
?5
S 2 in C U
^ QJ C3
2
>-i (73
O Z
jp
2 ■ 0.
P 73
P C
^ c ^P
Appointments
683
o o
c c
>- l-(
> >
o o
be bO
(4-1 <M
O O
in ^
3 P
a a
(U <u
^ o
OS
1 1 I 1 I I I I I 1 1 ^ 1 1 1 1 1 1
TJ^ ^rf^ "^t^ ^fH r i
(^^C^C^f(^J(^XC^^C^^C^rC^C^XC^fC^fC^fC^rC^fC^C^^C^^ln»OC^^C^C^^
XX
2 65
o
U U i
o .2^.21^ rtot^oooo-.oCC
p J3 J3 c: o
BEXX
o
w
U (u
c
.
^ o
u
c
OS
n 1 *^
^ 2
2 J
ScO
c
U U
2 ^
^sgg^?'>-i^, ^^^^
;=; (u
^ .s
O u
^•5 ..w
3 P O ^
O
!-i 01
«+J Q, <U 3
i; I- - cn
c a; . c (D
si
_cu.S2 o S I*
C . o o o
c o CO "So
O C
a 3
p, o
^ o
OJ 1- TO
>
S ft
' (D 0^ g £ o
.s c > j:: t/3 >> (D
CO ca ^ +^ cs .'. X
C C 0)
O p tc
w ± o
o cs
g cs i2
i
ii
^ Q> cS ^
J2 <u to
S £
.2 5
3.^
eco-r^ £.22
> <D -s 5
2^ co^ o ca
£3 *i
t; <c
^ g £
§ £t:
684
Papers of Terry Sanford
o o o o o o o
c c c c c c c
^ $M }-4 M S-H ^ Sh
QJ QJ QJ QJ U QJ aj
>>>>>>>
o o p p p p p
PPPCPPOPOO
cccscccccc
>>>>>>>>>>
PPPPPPPPPP
bCboboiysbcbobobObJDfaobcbCbc&cbiDisciwobc
PPPPOPPPPPPPPPPPPO
4J4JflJQJ4JCJQJ<UCJajCJCJQJCJQJflJ5JU
3 3 3
c« t« c«
3 3 3 3 3
IZI C/3 C« [/3 t/3
I:
c p
C p ^
r3 w P
^ C -Q
<U 2
So
cj C OJ
^ 03 P
O; U ^
^
u ^
a s2 s
ASA
tJ^ ^rt^ Tt^ Tt^
p <u
p ^
-° ^
3 P
SI
-om: i't^ p-3 p PS s P P 43
n T' P ^ O 6 T' ^ ••^ O -ri P -iir
r-i P OJ
« P
Vi t/3
1 =
p ^
^ p
s u
C ^ >^ .
3
^ ^ P a;
.3
^ ^ tfcl • . -^-^ W
. . 3 M
^ 3 ^ S
,S h < a.
■ 3
^S
SS
o
I> i> l>
S 2
^ (U >
o
3 45 W
OS
X
ffi U Q S
Appointments
685
TJH TJH -^t^ TJH Tfl
^ ^ — (M (>f
^ iQ
■ CO ■ '
i> !>• 00 m lo
f S S g g
O u i
c o
Pi
T3
C
1^^ so .
2 <u
§ ge^ 6 t: S
V 03 O
^ f_i
^ 5 ^ I ^ i
iO lO
CO CO erj
Tt^ CO ^
■> 'S iJ
OJ cj ™
00
I
2 ^
(J o
iO »C ^
CO CO ^ ^ CO
n QJ QJ rl
OJ > > u
•ii ^ ^ ^ ^
o o .
I— ,fctH I—,
RS . . O
X I-} hC
S ^
.. J- ^
dj o 5"
C O 0)
O (3
Oi Oi ^0).^
C O c3 cu
•r; O +j
° ?^ «« ?^
■^-^^ ^
3 5 Ul (U
Tfl Ttl - ^
0) O -u ft
a; o a
J c c
S>, M O
£5
0) , ® OJ
«3 CS (U
^ £'
c'
i|5£^
fe- ^ -3
0^ .. CO aJ ""
C O J' (U T3
y o «s
<u ^ Z ^ o
« ^ o
c ^ ° 2 c
S O te
K >^ 05 _
O o £ o
- S » S
Si). 0)
e J3 v ^
2S^.-£
,Otc
o <u
£^
: ?
bJJ^
o %
ft £
CS
a> cA c
tn O
ft
-£<
:5 S • >
£
3 (^^ '
i2 St3
u - £ •
s ^
J2 ^ S
p s- <u 2 3
. o '35 ^ s-i
T3 r; g _. tn CO
■5;^ £^ ^ «
■ o ft • £
W (U X M O
fiH . -T -cm
i-i S ^ S d
73 T) £
<u a> (1) 01 £ 0)
■TJ TS Q
2 ^
9 & 0^
£^
c £ ^"
I ^
5EW
x) o ^
a; X3 °
! C/2 H ^ ftCO CC
686
Papers of Terry Sanford
CM CM
O 6
o o o S
CO CO CO °V
o o o
'o 'o 'o
to <o to ;o ^
00 00 00 »r5
to to
to to
t£ CM (M CM (M CM CM (M Csr ' CO CO CO
!5 cototocotototo<o°^tototo
5 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ^050^05
O (MC^IcVcMlMCMCMCM^OOobob
u
O O o o
c c c c
(h (-. i-c
<U (U QJ
> > > >
O o o o
bJ3 bo be bo
OJ OJ OJ QJ
^ -C 43 43
o o o o
'%
<<<<
to to to to
H
00 00 CXD 00
H to
z
o
6 .5
(U (U (U <u
pti
o ^
DCS
c c ^ ^
PQ u .
a; .^-J'
>• O fS
H Q O U
C .22
be ^ O ^5 O bO-2 Q O O
P^aj>C^iSP5r1CCC
q/ 2 «J , ^ <L) lU <U :
c
o O
o o
§1
O BS
f=^ o
c c c
o o o
(73 1/1 1/3
l-l 1-1 i-l
(L» OJ OJ CU
•TS
C C C C
(U (U <U OJ
DC X EC s
c 8
. ^ ^ J
3
Pk
H
Z
w ^
o :::
Bi >
s
5^ A
Appointments
687
governor
governor
governor
of duties
governor
governor
OJ <D (U
■2 -C J5
ion
leasure of
leasure of
leasure of
:omplet
easure of
leasure of
c
CX Q-
< < <
3
< <
X Q
, U ^
US
3
L. to «3
2
W
H
O be to
3J OJ
O 0?
5 H
a;
to CO
o .-I
C -
a 0) CO
a; c
? <u .
C Q) ryj-
01 c
oX
^ c
X £ s
O a
Si
o .'O
to
S3 "I
> a; (U
-2 «4-l
^ a o
CM to
o
aj •
Si S f^'a
5 a ?i c
01 0.
ttH " 01 'J
o Pi 0)
2 "^W
u o
-o
»^ a^
o g S
o o
a; o ° °
X ^ o
s
OJ C lU
to
o
;o
a c <i>
=^ £ =
O 'O ^
01 '42
£« ^ O
^ o O ^
W 0)
c H " ?! ^
01 .S '-I
3 ® '
X c a; >^
5- O O p3 .
0) a
S t« ^ 1^ "i
g ^ ^ • S
^ o •• CO 5
- ^ Q
-.2
I ^ 03
o
T3 X '-H
0) U 0)
a co^
i!i ^ --rt to
g ^ & . i ^
Si o ^ej:g §
lie o aJ
.=£ 0) in H :
£ cs 01
Q <4H <D -a
y O ft OJ
^ c a; g
"• s- 0, ■■ ■
ax!
3 o
-"to r
^ o; 01 fJ
0) S c,
CO !- 01 ^
CO Ol
to
-2 £
E 0)
e ^
0 O
01 p,
to 03
u
3
cS "
<U CO
^ u
+-> (U
2S
cS (D
> CO
a^
a
01
1 3 01
: a c
be
o
ft :
m S
0) CQ
0) 4)
a 3
a o
0) S o
c >
. be c
'I'll
S 0. be
:« ^ - c C to ^
ih ca c c ts a< o
o
; o a^
! a 01
! 3 d ^
-g S
50
£^ co:;^
2 beu to T3 ID
•J to § £ g £
«i c [- S a
QJ r CO 3 lU
S.2
If
0) °
oj a; r
•£.S c
W 0)
Qj_a;_ai(upc3>,c>aj
o;
c tu
5«l
u C
o a> c
£ S S
(D ^ c
> a o
b«o ^
O o 0)
13 73 T3 ^3 > O
01 01 0) g t< ^
01
to
01
" .2-
T3 £ a;
0) dj C 73
oj o g
^^"^ .£
o
CIS
CO o
Qi T3
£ ct:
E
a
5 £
E
^ £ E
^'^ u
•S to ft
3 to
ft+J
c o
£ I
«f-( 01
3 So
0) C «H to
0.-^ avf
j= £ to
^ £ (u *
>- oX
' 3 3;C .
! 73 tZl H ^ 00
g be £ ^
.2 CM 5
£«^-
01 '
-C
c o
73 ^
a.ii
a5ti
ca o
r£! d h-1 a
688
Papers of Terry Sanford
!>.
<u aj aj oj Qj Qj
>>>>>>
o o o o o o
bC bC bC W) bC bC
o o o o o o
(U OJ OJ CJ <U OJ
i-i ;-i ^
3 3 3 3 3 3
t/2 to t/2 C« C/3
CT3
flj aj 5J W QJ QJ
1 pi j I p^ I pi ^
<<<<<<
fie
41
^ OO OO
CO «p «C to
o C5 cn cn
T 6 6
00 CO i-H I
o-if s
O i
h
<u
t-^
QJ
c' o "rt
g O « c
(J <^ W
. .
c« c«
J5
u C 3 1^
"I
T3 3
"3
O
C QJ
OJ be 3 ^
3 3 ^ O I
a; Si tc^ jTi
-ii Od "
^ ^ S J3 •
^ C/5 ^ O W ^
>
, O 3
o
o
<:
z
o
<
-U
ooobobobob^i-^toybyb^r-iiri
b o
' o '
C 3 C ^
O TJ 0^3 bO
-H 3 r:; ,«J
o
4^ OJ '
,3
> ^
^ C >. >
S M M i:ih
tfi eq U
Appointments
689
a ^ >
x>
CO "'f
oo CO CO o to
<d to
cn
I o ^ o
O <U
•S s
i
qj o
•III
. ; 3 o
- e ^ <u
^ ^
>^ > ^ •
Q ;> CL, «
!>• !>.
^ CO CO CO CO
^ o
a; ^
III
s S S
o
c
.2 «, ^ o
O °f C o ^
bi) Si < .
»> • Qj rt
03 C
56>
<^ t
V
^ ft
. ft
c >
c3 O
.si
o
ftiM
ft o
o c
0)
-I
T3 J
.i s
ft <u
s".
O 0)
IS
: «^ S'
03 . O
1^
ft c"^
c a o
a;0
o u
<v u Si
111
'-I I
S I' P
?! o
° c a
> 0^
S o; 2
n w ^ o
.2 25 i5 ^ "3
|l4|l^l;
...2 <u cd .
-a -s ^5 S
g ft S 2 0)^
H g ^-H '"MM
;5 C OSS ^
OJ 4)
0) 0)
0) (];
O
ft (1> 0)
^•2 S
3 :g
«• £ s .
fl fl
C > C «o
S-i O O 05
(u la c
<u c c
> 5 —
ft
. HI m t„ ^ ic
5? "
„ OJ c
^ S^o .
.2 q; ft-a
tn W3 !-i ft y
13 T3 73
3 §^
ft M
a; «J S S
3 £ •
T3 -|J J3
<U O g
C O C
CO C
" O c3
C y <U
M
C3 73
be ^
TT 73 -a
a> ^ V q^ o
ro 73 -a -a
q> qj OJ q; qj
q> q> q> q> qj
u o o o o
o o o u o
3 3 3 3
T3 73
q; OJ
q) q;
O O 2J O
3 3;C 3
M M E-l M !
! n3 T3 73
qj qj qj
01 q; qj
i I i
690
Papers of Terry Sanford
^ i^--
ssesssssg
<<<<<<<<<
CCCCCCCCC
ooooooooo
i-J i>- X> !>• C5
CO to ?0 CO ^
1> x>. I>
CO CO CO CO CO
^^4,^4,ir5ininiojncoco
cocotococo'^'^'^^^^^
COCOCOCOCO^^^^^^^
OOOOOOOOO
OOOOOOOOO
OhC^OhQ-iCLiCLiO-cD^Oh
^^^^^^^^^
z CNrcMcsro^CMCNrc\r
o
so eo CO GO CO CO
O O O
CM cy Ovf
cooocococoooeosooooococc
cocococococococococococo
c|^c^^c|^c^^c^^c^xc^^(MC^(^^(^i(^^
o
-a.
o K o E o
U i u
CJ
C
i c
^1 -5 c
^ Lh o > u
^ - I -So
^ <U — OJ O '3J
ffi 1 1 K I II
^ s :s 4^ ^
n . g ^
3-J-fi
:^ g O _ J
2> §
_ ^
J3 cfl fa £
o ^ "5 ,v
Pi iii c/3 a ^
in
O C
^ 2
4-1
^ '5 ^ bOT,
5"
3
CC
bo
C
11
1 1
c a
O
* c o
— c
« ^ -° ^
*^ >
<; P3 ? (jj
^ S ^ ^
c w 2 ^ o
OC>^t^^pj2<U
Appointments
691
CM C;X
CM CM CM
C > «!
c ITS <u
PsJ J U
c c c
-C J5 X
o o o
QJ QJ QJ
> > > > >
o o o o o
Oh CU CU Oh
< < < < <
C>I^C^CsfCMC^CMCMC^(MCMCM<MCvJCM
O rs
.£P2 .5f.£P.^.S^.Sf -5 ?2 go
'a; bc'oj '«j 'qj *<u 'oj O "> '> ^ be
pti Pi ^ -
-2 S
c >
- ^ s
c ^ «3 c
M T3
^ ^
a,p< ^ S h ^ U S W
3 O
c
•2^
OJ ^
Si
bo S
IK „
O 0)
5<
-js o
c
<-5
O S
T3 £
^ £
.^£
o p. u
m '■S.
CO
^15 2
^•2S£
0) C Cv]
H
« O g
c 2 ° c
^ > ° ^
^ ctf £
g OPQ g
C cs OJ
^ w .ti ^
.ti a) to
t« ^ hg «tH
►2 a; ^
cn o ° c
0) 0) S
a
to EO +J
01 0)
(1) 0)
to ,J0
£_
PhPh ,
"IP'
0)
^ ^ -a ■=!
cu c o ■ ■
- - o o c
to a; ^ a c
sill
C OS
^ re ,
J2 I* ^ a*
05-^ :5
S C ^ >
uc^ >. ^ i c:
= toi
3tf
to £
to a
to c
S £
£2
c >.
5 o
£ C
. Oi
>. >
£
0) 01
c
.2
o ° •-
o o w
O <U
-Ills
S 2 -
to bxi
!r ^
<4H ro o
3 £
•5
01 _
- -Ji ^ XI
OJ (U 0)
£ o
'3 in
o
(U 3
£ 0) X!
P. C
" O O £
• . 0) ^ "-I
£ .
c3 c
£-§
bc-^ "
O T3 ^
0) QJ o
eo 2 5 !
I 3 to c3
o o
<; 0)0! _ ^
_ q] 0) ai
• i oT . -
^ O 01
w o OJ " ^<
""^ C5 to _ o »
^- ^ § ^ g c
OJffi c S g
. S ojS be c
; ."^ c ft
5cc . qj 5 c re
2 . . o) re cij c re _i
3 "=> c ? £ ^, ««
>> & ^ c "S^ r-^^
lo "3; o; re ^ "2
M (u to ^ ft a>
V3 +j M to
692
Papers of Terry Sanford
t*3
Tt^ f;r f;:;
to CO ^
o o o o
CO oo "7
(ji CO «c> <o
00 00 00 00 00 00
"^t^ tJ^
CDCOCOCOCOO(X5^
oboboboboooooooo
o
-a.
lo m m in
!W CM c\r
£ = ^
^
U
Q c e ^
K ;5 u ^
^ ~; J
u hJ E n:
CO " " "
, CO CO «0 CO
CO CO 1 ■'t' "'J^
. . 05 CM cvr
OO 00 ' ' I '
. , CM -H -H -H
CTi CTi ^ ^ ^
Qj -t; c u
1
c
c
5
U
COCOCDCOCOCOCOCO
CO
00 00 00 OO
^ (U OJ
^ b
c U O ^ ^ ^
8^
> § -
3
3o ^ "5
^ 5
S c3 • ^ cq ^ ^
^ > X ^ W T3
U Q O O ^ ^ ^<
O Oh
O
2g c
O o
Q
< J
z
o — ^ ^
- CO CO CO
c c c
<u <u a;
OJ OJ (U
S-< ^ S-c
o o o
be 2
3 fee
. O UJ
Is < <
Appointments
693
CO CO
01 c
^ ^ ot
CO CO «D CO CO
^ 6 ^ ^
p-H c>i
00 00 05 C» 00
5 c
03 ^
a; Cu C oj -
> ^
o
U
l-c
> a; CL, [i, ;^
52 CO
o .
" O
a;
b £
p o
O ft
C ft
to -^^
u
11
c a;
<u C B,
3 ^1
O C
" £
^ £
p O »~i
Is":
Si 01 l-H
c S "
£
c
£■" S
° m
.5? CO £
01 -f
0) .«
s- O
a ft
o
0) 05
>"-3
OJ ^
o be
I— ( O; T3 ?!
— ~ 0) tfl o Q f2
<U Si's • .5d V3
m c3 to O • J3 —
£ tc ^ t/j '5^
O O _0J
" "-5 "H d 5 1^
o -^3 . s-i ™ .
^ -73 73 13 73 73
~ 0) 0) 0) 0) 41
^ C 73 73 -a
P ^ o> c
Z ?fH'0'337373T373 C S
C 'to
5 £ c
?; £
p. o o £
o o
^"'^^ -
0) o
C
C ^ 0>
o -S £ ^
ft q ti S
% -B f=
.5 a; "o
C-S«t-i ft
+^ O ft
£
o .S
ft
S as;
ft
9 » S
^5
O 73
0) > .
o
15
<u o . o
^ " ^ s
o o g §
O o O 01 -t-*
?2 !>■<-! ^
^ £
0) I" ,
01 ^ ?r „,
5
C IS
£ 4J X
c ra Co -J
' o; o) .
i 73 fH «n
^ ^ in '
O
S 5x c .
C5 o C o
B ^ .
O) «4H <1 5 Oi
CO a;
1 £ o o;^
^ £ 2 o'
■o-^ £^
O ft o
CO
73'T373 73 73 73jJo4'0j4l
£'^ ^
0) 01
i<sl;o>o)o)0)4)ol
o M
j3ygg333^3-^33gggOgO«je_^gcflc^
C3 73 O UQ >
^ 5 " c S 3 3
;ia £ ^:H-42g ^
; S oj a; M cS n «
, £Q
694
Papers of Terry Sanford
1*5
CO oT) on
00 00 00
m m m lO
to CO O ^ ^
o
J
^ S 3 S
P 6 6 6
^ CM Cs|
J ^ -c
.•z o
J P!5
CO o o o to
50 to CO CO CO
CT) CTi CT)
c c r; c c
o o o 2 2
be be £^ be be
_C C ^ C C
O
6 S S S i £ E
CO
CM CO
^ ^
6 2
00
I
Oh
PQ
dj 2 U .5
> 3 c w
^ o 'C •
O J eu, H-,oi
c
o
^^^^_.^^co
cocococccococo^
oboboboboooboocM
o -a
be
c OJ c o w
-. 0 o -^»^ 53 o --H
i3 C 03 X -c S
W flj C/D ; «2 C • - ]2
6
cs
OJ u ^ o
b > Oh (iH
•~ cc
^ O s.
CO CO CO CO CO
CM CM C J <?;I CM
i>. !>. !>. X>.
f" c c o cj
^ " = 13 -2 ^
^ SH Si
O
^ be
< =
z
O CQ
<
U
X
H
b:
o
Z
is c
n o
1 5s
^ (J
S-, E <^
>W U ^ J
Appointments
695
05
CO
t-" CO
CO CO to CO
0006
CO 00 CO 00
CO CO CO (£3
cvr CM 0|X
!>• !>. !>. ^
Qj O <u aj
flfl
C 2 C i-i
o C <u n
5 Id i»
^5
ctj > Q
U 03
W I —
696
Papers of Terry Sanford
o o o o
c c c c
(U <U OJ OJ
oooooooo
biDbcbObObCbcbcbC
Qj Cj OJ <u
«o o <o <o CC
oooooooo
'% '% '% '%
<<<<<<<<
CO CO CTi
to CD «0 <0
00 00 00 00
c\r CM CM
CO ^
;o to to o ^
->tl -<tl '"tl -5t( Tt<
o
CO
GO OO
^ GO CO CO
^ ^ CO CO ' ' CO
CO CO ' I <—i I
I . CM CT) OO CtO
C5 O^l CO — I ^ ^
c c iJ fcc
c
< '^^
(M (!0 GO ''f
COOOOOCOCOTtiCOCO
CO CO '' CO
(>J(MCMCO00iOiO^
'oj "tS *> 'qj 'C 'C u u
■ .
s ..
o
u
z
O u
p 5
< >
CC CO
o :5
o
^^^^
W Pii U U
C T3 -O
o c
-■=§«
> ^ -tii
C 'O "oo ^ . 05 pQ
c u ffi ^ I ^-
Z u < K
I
l.i ^
i-i *
C o r
bo
. Q ■
C
S Ah
< h ^
OJ O
CO
CO CO CO CO to
C>. I> 1> t>
1^ ^ ^2 ^
p o
-voce
3 3 O --H
Appointments
697
CM <M CM CM CM CM CM
O CO CO to CO CD to
CTi CTi CTi C7i 0~)
IH l-l (X (h (-C (H >-l
9J CJ QJ QJ OJ U HJ
^ X! -Q ^ J2 X2 XJ
s 6 s e e g a
4J QJ QJ <U (U QJ
cj (J cj u u cj cj
<U (U O (U (U <U QJ
Q Q Q Q Q Q Q
o o
c c
CO Tt< CO w
o o o o o
G C C C C
a; Qj Qj u (U (jj qj
>>>>>>>
o o o o o o o
bo bo c»c bo biO bo be
o o o o o o o
0000006
CLi CU CL( Oh CU
Cj qj qj U U (U 4j
;^ Pi &i Pi Pi Pi
—H CO CO CO CO
' CO ' 1 ' 'CM
10 . xo in io 10
CM J. J, ^\ y. CM
CM
CM CM CM CM
a <=>
S £
o
u
3 2
Cfl
c
C bc
o c s
s5i
.ti o
c
. -5 2 u
g56
(US ^ m
M P3 9
O
1^
£5
£^
£
00 oi
£ &
£-
ai (u 0)
-a -O "O T3
01 01 0) a;
o> o> a> o>
to C «5 c <u S
£:^
■o -a o ^ -a
5J 5j ti .-H a;
CQ
£ 5
ill
S £i
O OJ Ph
M-S •
.22 *^ J
S >•
£
3 SX3
. «4H ^
- O i
< £
.2f X3
it
<u a> 01
-a T3
01 01
0) 0) 0)
c C £
01
05
■ o 'o u
3 « «i « 3 o
« " O O n t
O 3
73 "a 73
0) o; O'
73 'O
I 0> i) 01
0> 0> 0*
73 73 73 0) £
0) 0) 01 '*-' 0)
T3 T3 -.Q ?, a
3 3 3 3 3 3 3
: C 3 ^ ..
1 S .i
III § 3 e
S 3 *
698
Papers of Terry Sanford
8
o
-a.
S on so CO CO eo
< « «0 O CO <o
^ ^J^^^^J.^^^ ^^^^J,^^^
66^^^^^^^?^ ^ 6666666666666666666
C^lc^TiOieoeococoeooo _,— i,— ii-h^.— i^,— ii— (— h_i
^^t^t^^^^^^^ g^^^^^^^^, ^^^^^^^^
<
z
o
C J3 OJ OJ
O .bp C
<
C o bcS
u
If
o
I—) i
^ o -Q
> in 3
;> w u
c^ .5 .
S < J ^
n: c
S 2
^ C
a- S
o .-T o .i- HH X o .iir o 3 C .S"
>^ O ^ Xi ^ Cuoj^ OJ o O 1^
u
bo
o
o ^
2 J5
O Ph
u
(-1
bO
bO
3
^. g 3(2
Id
O o
Appointments
699
5 I- to 9
tn 0) >,
C «4-i rt
?■ o e
o
X) o
ooooooooooo
_ O 3J
!5
as
o .
a
S 1
§ S C ^ -75
g -rt <u 3 3 ^ Cli
o I:: t; .id
^ ^ ^ 5
O . QJ
(D a; c * 5 .S
o, (u -!->
^ :^ S S .2 .2 S
cs ji a > -ji c
«»-(■? (u <; w
o-So > §j
V C 4) C .
<u <u o .bl «
O ^ X C «
-o^ £ a' c ^
^ ^ -S ^ ii r- .
.22 5.2 S^--
g <U 01
0) — CO
^•2 £
® c
ill
u <u o Z
(U a» C3
^ 3
III &
u p.
2 S3 £
bJ c O
1 -a .
5 2
ft o'
ft <u
_Q
tn 01
CS 4> H
(Tj r; 5J
CJ i>,
ft cS^ O
c-2 a» o o 3
73 C
(U (U <U >, 4)
S c ^
<S o
-M* £ K
c o «
a; U C
OT ^ O
c
£ .
u ■ +^
^ <u ea
ox; ja
3 4) .Ph
. ft 0) (4
^ o C.2
1^ s-r u .=s33 es
T3 tJ 'TJ T3 "O
U cs .5 CO ft .-H
„ c "
ft O M
3 a; o ■
£as^
lU <U <U (U
V V <i) <u
o w u o <y
o w « « u w
3 3 3 3 3 3
I i I
'T3'0'OT3T3't3'0'T3'
4)0)q;q>qj4J4>o
1 1 g § ^ 3 !
700
Papers of Terry Sanford
sssgsssggg
CCQQQQQQQQ
OOOOOOOOOO
cccccccccc
(nS-cS-it-ii-H^-i^i^Ul-,
>>>>>>>>>>
0000000006
bcbCbobobcbiObCbobobiD
OOOOOOOOOO
It
oooooooooooooo
^ ^ c
15 ^ c > > i > C eg U U -c ffi a
QJ e in — ■ —
bbw S C S J5 W .. „
o w i ^
r- <^ —
OOOOOOOOOO
13 ^ C
U b i2 .S2 ^ ^,
§ rr; c ^3 22
O c/^
TO
obooooooooooobobooob
[ij I
V3
cu c
o o
X B
u
bc'rt
C C 2 C S
o o ^ s o
£•§ is
Pi
O
^ «|
OJ o c
oj
OJ
(h (u ^
- U C ijj j_ dj
c; <ij rt g
OJ c«
-O C
CO
35 I ^
S ^-ob
1- CO ' CM
sag
JS 3
U cr
3
bc
S »
P5 O
. P.
W3 QJ
O
OS
<
a 2
< o p:
Appointments
701
oooooooooooooooooo
cccccccccccccccccc
)H^;-i)-ii-cS-i;-i;-i!-i)-i^i-i>Hi-i;-ii-ii-ii-i
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
000006006000000000
bCfaCbCbctuDbCbCbObOfacbcbObObcbObObctiC
'o'o'o'o'o'o'o'o'o'o'o'o'o'o'o'o'o'o
'$ '$ '% '% ^2
CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO
COCQCOCOtOCDCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCO '^ '^
J3 •-'
O
(=•5
a;
o a'
g-2
cccccccccccccccccs
222222222222222222
c 5 C
<^ e JO
C ^
' 'J J3 _e <u
Q ^ .IS
t3 g^2
.2o'-i<iJ^^:5sd
d^; ^^-^^^ ^o
^ ffi J3 ^ ^ . - ffi
2 >
b;:2
a: h U U < J £ H »i
U Q
o
c
o
c s
.2
0) '"5
2 £
5 S
So s
be o
wo ^
o 0)
^6
_b<icc O
^ ^
S O O
o
. ft ° s
8 a,
S i?
I 73 T! TJ T3
Q) 0) £ *J
ft >
1= C
be o
'm ^ 'A
<u P< u
C OS
.S <w
o Jd
"HI
CO
I o a*
^ O « &
a So
ft ^ i-j
cS 3
<3 o; .£ . <;
"3 0) rn 5
c S.2
£5
g (U (U
« 3 3
J O O 5 "3 .
3 3 3;C J' w
5! S 3 c9 oT
5 5 5
11 5
r-t O
5 5 5 5
702
Papers of Terry Sanford
QJ U <L) <U
> > > >
o o o o
bo be bo be
■S-.2
m XC IT! ID IT) XO
to ^ ^ to lO
C5 CT) CT)
V V <v <u
^ U i-
3 3 3 3
c/J c/: c« c«
9J <U (U <U
'dh'E-'H-'Hh
CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO
obooooooooooooooob
<<<<
o
CO ;o
— I — CO ■
yp CO «p ^
00 00 00 i^J
^ o
o
X
H
<
z
o
H
s
w
nJ r; t/3 4J t/3 O
W bb'3 t
•-3 O IT' O
C/3
13 ^
u
s
' ^ - P .5
to CO J^; ^
^ , 1 <o CO ^
9 CO CM c\r ' ' CO
fii 1 (O CD ^ '
O «? ? ? (M (>j «^
pq _ — I « CO
z
o
H
i
u
z
< 'C -3 .5 •> ffi ^
CJ
S sea
5
II
OJ U t«
^ ^ . x: 3
I ^ ^ e
O U O ^ c/^
cooocococococoeooo
COCOCOCOCDCOCOCOCO
I sij ^ £i 2i ^ 2^ 2i
g ^^^^^^^^^
3 3
§2
O ^ O 3 g .S
X
o
^ bo^
O 03 hJ
bC^
Oj 1
>-<* i i
c i i
ox
ochr
rell
11 ...
o i .2-
u
'^/^
bo oj
Geoi
Fred
Will
Ashl
Mon
Tho
Eugf
Earl
Appointments
703
CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO ^
obobobooobobooooooobobobooobjJ
CO CO CO CO CO CO CO GO CO CO CO CO
'_L_L'_L_L''''_LCMOJ^'
cn
C >p C be
60 >
I °
M OJ
,11
3
is
bc o z: c 2
c <u o 5 o
c ^ 15 ti c
03
c
o
^ Si ^' I =
^ pq H U E
? be
i-i c
O xo
w
H
o
z
<
w
u
z
M
U
<
z
<
u
O
Z
-2^
o
C :
eo
15
Is
0)
S o
§■ CO- ^
«M tt .S «4-( .
O O > O •
H Q ft .2 ^
..2 oj .S c
QJ (1)
•Q S
:5i «
£ to c M
§ g s <"
>
- <v
E « 0, c g
C 05 t^-
■2 o ^
g 0) O 00
a: cS
si
01 rt g
o>
£ti 0> >
• OJ > * O
coJ^r.s-
'gl^«
> «H g !- •
CO O g| 3
Si
0) <u o OJ -s ^- o
^ j3 a o
" t>> ,A 1* £ "
o ^ ^ « '43
c — ^ +^ c
b^uS g_^
^ in 0) , 5
c3 C 0) ^ .
S j: o S o
0) 73 rih j: _ «o
^ <u a a
c<^j=. go r
OJ «(H tH
^ ft OJ ••
° £-5 £ °«
0) o> I
.2.^1 S $^
c ri c OJ '2
Q I— ' 0) C .
^•S o .
* o ^ H " S:
O S t-i " OJ "*>
O) W 4» ^<
J= to o S a> o
^ OJ e "l*
, cs OJ .2 cs
ii 2-^-2 ill
S a3 " 3 o 2 £
>>i a £ ^ 2 ft
^ScortOoftft
OJ u
H
£
OJ to o w w u
■U to «H
4) O ^
S £ o-^E
f 1 ni -w -t-" "
o -„ii . to
ftS
0:5.2 c^w
©■^ £Q OJ
n-i^ft<i''5ojo)£
OJOJ .Eiftrf'*-?™
«^ S -a
H H rr ft 3
,5 ,5 -5 ft a* ft £
8 S 3 oj^S^^
704
Papers of Terry Sanford
<u <v <u V
■£ *c *G *2
cr y3
(U <u <u <u
-a T3 -a ^3
c c c c
S E S S
^ U u
aj oj 4j <u
H h H h
o o o
c c c
<U QJ <U OJ
> > > >
o o o o
bc be bo be
o o o o
V <L) <U i)
u u u u
3
3 3 3
C« C/2 W3
r3 ct3
< < < <
<M CN
«0 CO «0
C5
;-i !x ^
(U OJ u
^ J3 X3
s e s
OJ (LI U
(J <J U
U <U OJ
Q Q Q
o o o
c c c
U i-i i-i
a; qj (u
> > >
o o o
bC bc be
■a,
o
OOOOOOOOOOCJOOOOOOOOOOC
oj c g a jc ^ x: jz ^
Q a O.^ C Q Q G.(=«^
U U i c i i i U
c
^ O ^ i ^ i i ^ i S
^ n . ^ c 2 ^
U e i H pQ
cj C <iJ
t! o S >
° bJO*> >r
X
oo so
CM
o
u
si
i iX
H
en
.i5 3
^ OJ - C
2 u <u
^ 3 s*^ u
fcH O 03
U cq CQ J
5s
3 c/D ^ PQ
J- X 73
3 r3 03
o o o
CL, CU
<U QJ <U
fa z
o o
< U 3
1-1 z a
H Z c/,
O U
>• a. u
Z S ^
^ o S
2 <^ Z
o
up (O CO u
rs.t r\i r\i
OJI OJI
CT) CT)
< O
O <
a
o
03 x:
-
03 oj
^. ^ I
J X <
Oh .
3 a; or:
3 t« >-
o
u
z
o
H
z ^
Appointments
705
.-H ,— I CM eo CO
CO <0 to «o
O O 00 cfi Cl
<M CM ^ ^
00 00
C C OJ ^
<
>-i eg (u J_| >
o S z o >
o o o o o
CO CO CO <so oo
o ^ ^
r-i <—t CO so
to to CM to CO
--^ ^ ^
Oi ^
— 1 »o oi cr;
c o c
2 S § -a-s
S (u qj ^
ID m'^
"71 rr.
Is.
T-H
g CO d
o o r:^
c S
ft w
p. 3
cS O
(1> W
s
to' ?i
CO
£ ?, s i a M
01 oj oj ^ " i:
z cs .
>. ai .S o CO
o *OT 01 a>
W <u O 73 <M
be c
O 0) ™
0) o
>^ 01 ^ 2
5tc o
o x:
!- Cd 0)
C 01
►1 c
So,
C
5
' O m ^- „ .2 dS
-o o
5
W tJ i; to
_ ft _.
CJ CO +^ flj W S-(
^? .-t^ S o;
?i S ^ -
° c •
ft
01
0)
ca o
c b«
5 ^
ho;
: 73 ft c
13 T3 ^ ID T3 T3
T3 73
S 5
ojojojoojyoji^
o O o; o
3 > 73 3
OJOJOl 0)0^0)0(1)
^ c S
is
to C «
■is?
. to
O 3
0 ^ • O
-a -a?
OJ OJ 2
•n 73
OJ (U
01 a> '
5 c3 o
MS;
§^ . S
Geo ft
3 •- to
!>2 lOgK,'
2M<J'i3 toH S SMI
o o; .2
C J3 to
so ^ o
3
f JZ -Mi
706
Papers of Terry Sanford
1
Q X
xft CO !>. 00 00
to <0 CO to ^ ^
lf5 ^ lO )0 ^ ^9
"'f'
4i 4' -4i 4*
seesessss
O-iOiCUCUCLiOhCUOhO-i
o o
O O O O
C C C C
S-i )-i i-i
QJ 9J U 9J OJ
>>>>>>
o o o o o o
bcfcJDbobcbobCbobObc
ooooooooo
-25 g
■Oh
Z
u
w I
o p<
H Hi
o W
O H
Z
CD CM ITS lO
^ ^ w c C OJ
.bf .bps § ^
"C *aj '> ^ "3 '>
re *j 2 -ij »Q
.2 ^
CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO
oooooooooooo
5 § c S ^ S c P
OS
03
5« IX,
•i-J QJ "
s-i be u . •
J2 Q w I— ' l<
C^i O ^ W J
2S|
PQ S
(u O
^ on )-i
5
•5 Si o
^ u c*:
OJ O
o 2
^ (U
o
3S
IS 11
U "71
Cfl — S-i ^
S PL,
ooooooooo
ooooooooo
Hhhhhhhhh
O coco«o<ooco<ococo
o S 6 £
U 2 S o - o
u ^ ^
C ^ c S?„
CD >
c ^
< o
,«! hJ
i2 J
Pd
OJ O
O 1^ - ^
U 1j u c
3 • o .2
c 13
• bc
^ o
. <u
f
Appointments
707
OJ OJ o
C C c
q= !X: y=
OJ <U OJ
-O -^3
C C c
S 6 £
^ si;
QJ OJ QJ
CM CO
CM T c\f
O "I
^5 ^
05 Oi 05
00 00 00
;5 u H
. <u
^ _
csJ S »5
S'
b
. s g
T C 42
^ ^ cd
O >
O <U (p
a, a; c4
^ o .2
+^ a S
ft
^ « s
cr o
(u O u
5
" >H I-
m 3 O
S S 5 ^
^ +j 1^
T3 is c3 CO '^j
•5 a; ^ .2?
ft o • .2
i ||||
£ a> § £ S
J2 *^ ° ^ CO
£ « ?i S £
S ^ § «i.2
Co s
il pi:
3
3 XI .
Hoc
c ..
C T3
CO
4; C4 O
C 01 r
<i»t5 >.
t; c3 («
o ^
ft . u
ft «
ell
<1> 3 C
c o o
oj c ><
bo O t«
c pq
O > h
0) x>
3 2 c
° S3 g S
<3 K .2
■■a T3 T3 g
u 0) £ c
T3 'U Q O '
C to ^-
^ ^-^
J3 O
o
^ 10
o <u
o es
to ^_l
C ft
S*-2 o
° 0,
>; s ^ 15 ti
o :s 2 <!'
a (I) r ft
« em -Q
« >.«»-i . c
£ra-E
to oj
to ^Ij
2|
rt ft
ft .
m ca CO
^ CO •
O to
;3 £ in
- * .
C-Q to
£ £
.2 ii °°
'm 55 1!^
b ^ - ft
5 o >> ft
o
11^
O CO 03
s" "5
.B £
£.2
U O
3
h X
2 " 2
^ £
01 £ 5
SO (U
2* «« c
£ ^-s
;5 c
i to «i
, £ £
A-5 S
a
•♦-> (1)
3 (U to
■£3
£ >^ Q .5
.2 5
S S5 ^ ft to^ C a;
00
£ 2-^-- , S to'
? -a £^1
en rtH
<1) 3 3 3
3 C
S £ £ »J
b -a T3 TJ
(1) <U 4)
^ u; « <U
^ ^ ^ Q)
Tj ^3 "^3
t/J M M
'I 5 I
S 8 S S
fit, .Cq)(U'5"'u
S"-»Oa,bo£Ooort^^
liliriiisii.
708
Papers of Terry Sanford
l<5
in in
in
in
in
in
in
in
up
up
to CO
yp
CO
«p
«p
up
up
up
up
CO
CO eo
eo
CO CO
CO
so
eo
CO eo
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO in in
t> in —
CO <£>
CO to
«p
«p
«p
CO CO
tjp
«p
up
CO ^
CO yp «p t>.
4i
"T
4 4i 41
Ttl
4l Tfl
4'
4-
""ti
4i
4i
41
4 4i
i>- i>
CO to CO to
in m m m »n
COtOVOCO«O^OCOCD^OCOtO
— I — I — I — . CO
CO up up up up T^i
00 00 CZ) c» eo ^
00 00 00
CT> <0 50
c
2-52
3 gj C -2
o
1q si
o ^
o
I*
O !
CD
>H flj
!S S E
(J . (U . <U >-l ^
,H ;^ w
p ■> "C "C
G *^
he (-I
■I"
Z o
3 q« O >
IT o ^
i-Jh ir
O CO ■
lU 3 <u £p
J2 ^ o
U e*^ E
^ 1 ^ ^
i; ^ o
3 c« <u «3
Q N W
^.H-j pi
B S
D s: ^
^^^^^
Appointments
709
2 SooSSo^SS^oStoS
O oooooooooooooo
M CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO
o
u
3, .bp
S3 ^ o c X
bc b o bo
£ cj ^ (u J 'C ^ £ 5
' — ■ (U ^. Iri V ri u
c .
3 ^ '«i
IS
.1
o ^
3 <
^4
O J
03
u u
C/2
^ OJ flj
1— I Ti _n T
^ 73 -Q J C
o
Pi ^ 3 I.
c
c
a: <
a.
0-1 c
• — >^
O ^ 03
■»5 o c
=^ s
u
g ^ o
OJ
„ S.9
Q a
c
§ 0) £
-C o
710
Papers of Terry Sanford
Q X
6006000660000000
CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO
I CM
'66
01 00 00 ^
S s
« 3
z
(U ^ H *^
c/i h
c
5
3
[I. .
O W
O <u
c/5 O d Q
I,— trti— I— 1,^— ICO— i^CO <0
(^^C^^C^IC^^C^C^lC^I^-;-C^XC4CMCM<^I^«p
i^r^ir^i-^t^ir^x>-oor^t>.i>.t^x>.oOi-H
O cd
. ^
! i i , i
*i »-i w
^
,Q h d u J 6 ^ h K^K
I-
<; (jh pQ
O yp to CO
^ CM CM
Z I>
o
OS
<;
u
(U Sh (U
lis
o a;
o
u o ffi
^ o C
o . -d
o c S
O tU W
Appointments
711
to (O <0 (O (O
O CO OO CO
Of OJI OJI Of OJ( OJ(
!>• OS CTl OS
C fl O <U jC -
> 3 C OJ i5
So
6-:
< Ac
U
H
5/3
5 CO eo
f-^ o6
<;
< c c c
J c o O 0
b flj C C C
° ^^^^
3 3 3
PQ PQ
, "3
; O O
i X
■ c ^
«J ^•
CP 2 cJ5 Q
rH 3
S O
- b« g
>> ^ >-i
x> g ^
«i o 5
a; S
'° cs o
O p;
03 +j
C„ cS
Or; u
OT a a
S ^ .
13
sli
CO o
•is c
M ^ «
o * 5
" ^ a
. £ ft
ft o5
'u eg
t/3
(0
II
1^
o
13 <:
P S S
>H g (U C ,
iH <u S t-
Uj T3 5!
S ^ ^ If
to O (U 03 g C
> -C
o 0) ca
■a o
a;
ft-^<3
S
c ^
5 (N
^1
*5
03 O °?
* So
"5
3
o o 2
o SCO
O 'S 3 -
CJ o ni o
« o '-0 •
-at, S?
fco o cj_c be
O 0) -C «w ,
3^ f!
S D o "i* «>
cs .S o
?J 2 S ft
. ai-S-g ft
1 ^ C 0J =
a; g
03 b - ^<
03 3 C «H tt)
<; c o o +S
' ^ u <u M
05 ^ OJ
• . M -Si S a
4) '3 ^
3-C S'^"'
; 'a 73 T3
' 3J OJ (1)
.73 73 T)
(u 01 a>
0) OJ o»
woo
o o o
3 3 3
'03
TJ 73 73 M -
0) (U OJ D 73
73 73 'O >
0) 1) ti) 0)
OJ o;
(U OJ 4> to*
0, Qj C c =S
CJ O QJ C 0)
o o j3 o
>> 03 ,
^ 9)
> c
03
g ?*
03 >>
5 3^ I* C
I 73 73 73 73
' OJ OJ QJ OJ
I T3 T3 73 73
C OJ.
OJ btna
^ p
/I, "3 "
o; (U o
h15
3 3 3 3 3 3
\mxfimm
<tf be OJ
O O
712
Papers of Terry Sanford
CO ^ CO CO to CO CO
CO CO CD CD CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO
CO CO CO CO CO CO CO
^1
•S
o
^•5
bo «5
Is
a OS
11
S-i
S >
H
1 1 I 1 I 1 u,j u.; lij
O ooooooosoicricn
Q
<
O
M
^5
o o O .tl S w ^
Id c
2 .S
rtn3'^Sr3^c/2c/2.2a3
^ o o o
-2
OS g biO <u CU:;3 oj
. - c« - ^ W
W ffi S ^ Acl P^' ^ ^
Tin T^H -^JH •'^^ ^
cocococococococjpcocococo g
CD CO CD CD CO CO CO
CM CM CM CM CM Cv| Cv|
eo oo CO CO eo CO CO
g I u 3 S 3 u
(Xj kL
• - o o ^ o o
CD
< a,
<u _
5 ^ c
^ X! o
^ c c 2 3 (u iJ
3 bc.ti ^ g t3
P5 cn < > Ph h- »^
CSS
(U O fl
/
Appointments
713
«0 «0 to CO CO
i>.t^r^cococo<oto«ocototo
oooooooooooo
COOOOOOOOOOOeOOOCOOOOOOD
ybcotoybcocDcococo^oybto
05 O
a; V >.
^ o
so eo CO CO CO
u o u £ u
o
^ ni ^ JtS ^
r- s-i
>^ ^ >^ CJ
^ ^
2 = 2
CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO GO CO GO
cocococOCOOCOOcoOCOCO
C^fC4C^fC^C^XC^C^C4C^rCMC^^C^I
C30(»c5bo6o6obo6oboocx)obob
(U gj
C ^
o
QJ QJ (U OJ
CO C/3 C« [/I <-l
< < < <
-5 ^
> ^
I O
3
i 3
= 1 ■ ■
<1J .2 .5 ^ r
o = 3 ^ 3 i
-2 -O O -n
U W
o o o o
O ^ T'
^ <M CM CM
OS ^ ^ ^
<
O
pq
u
H -
H
J ^ ^
$ J3 X3 J3
rn VI
y <<<
(U
C
c o
rS o
O l-i f-;^
0 > '-' tn tn
• g ^
o .2 c
P ^ tiJ ?
1 ^--^ s
> C to c <u
c
01
.2 Q)
O >> C
a; .
s .
s b 9
C e
o o o o i
+^ ,5? HI
^-"^^^-^^
c S
tfi « CO
. <| U 03 <U
C -o T3
-jf <U <U OJ (U
o -a -a ts
O G> «M o g
S-i ^ O 3 +J
W .0 .c
m *o
'») ft
c ft
5^
<u o o o «j
01 S D 3 3
s s i " ^
" ^ .5
So ^ O'
o tn sh 01^
m< g OH ^
a a o 2 <u '
714
Papers of Terry Sanford
CO (O <0 CO
C5 ^
CO to «o
o o o o
CO CO CO CO
CO CO «o ;o
<
Q
u
^ coco^ctocotococococococo
obooobobcbobooobobobc»>-^
c csrc\rcsrcsfCMCsrcMCsrcsf(>4-(M^
- •<ti rt<
5 CO CO to Xi
CNT 04 (M CM
CO CO CO CO
Tt< Tt< ''t' -^l
CO CO CO CO
CO CO CO CO
<» <» 00 c»
-5
<L)
> C rs cj
u S
c c c .i:
o .2 o o
o o
Q c
u
C
faJD
M (si ^ M
^ ^
d
c >
'"c
^ c
^ ^ S S
^ Q o o
"ill
(73 .rt
e O 3
o >^
K a 5 J
3 S
^ X! -S J=
o .i: 3
23 J 0^
Appointments
715
<U CO
o
CO ^ to ^
O O O o o o
r-~ 1-1.
05 0^05
OO CO CO
CT5 CT) CT) O
csf CM CM csr
00 00 00 00
U to CO S so CO so
O c\r c\f to to CO
^ i>- j>. 00 00 oc
CD
CO
o c
o o o
u
W (U C 03
o
o S S
— C rt O
is o PQ '
<:
z
C
— OJ hH rt
a 1 M
pq 1
i : ^
be : S
OJ 1 : OS
F i
a; , re
U i-S3 0
O
<u
c -a
g < g
c
IS
Is
si
O l-
Si5
So
j= o
St?
! . . O
.5 a;
03
-a ^ .
CO
g 5
m 03 ^
■3 .e
_ E M >."5
o o o o
c c c c
- - ' <v V <u o o
01 0) 01 <M '•-I
5 5 <
3 3 3 3 0) 0)
3 C/2 W W OJ W 1
I «tH «H ''^ 0)
, a, o> * «
1 0; 01 3
! m M E-i w
1 g § §
T3 T3 -O C
0) 0> V
TD O
0> o; a> o
O) H Q) «tH
o o w
U O t> 0)
3 3 3 0)
mxfixnm
716
Papers of Terry Sanford
s
Q X
to CO CO to to to CO
Oi cr> ch
m in ^ irfj ^
tS.^ 0Oc<^SOCO5O<!O0D0O0OGOCO
fn\ pr^ fi^ I
'O^oOCDCOCOCOtOCOCO
ocnoooooooo-^
i I
S ■' w
X U
tOCOCOCOCOCOCO rti— 1^1— II— I
>S <^ 06 ob
I,— I— I I- I—
" 6> 6> <6 6) 6) <6 6> a '^^ ^
PQrt,— I— Irtr-H^rt ^ 1^
^ I
O QJ 0-1 <U (U OJ
»-i c 1;^
ro 03 cTj o
G
C o
O ^ > C
o o
o — o ^
)-( .rt tH he
X5 ^ <u
I"
— <_p (U
0
H
_l
U
Z
0
U
Oi
0
c/3
Q
<
(U
u a
T3 TD 'O
o:; (H >-i i-i )H
000000
1-7 M-l M-l U_l U-l
X X X X X
00000
o ...
c c
c
_ -r" H O 2 s
> . C !-c
ro O w •— I j-j Q
< K § ;§ ffi J d
« ^ ^ ^ ^
tH CO to CO to
o o o o
o 7, 7.
o 4j qj
> "C o S t!
3 <J S o
O 'cS
i
u
^ ^
^ to CO to
CO CO CO
^ in in »c)
oa
.J
<
S3
o
ffi O O o
(H Jh
J o o o
^ C« CO CO
c2 C C C
O <u <u <u
Z, <U (U <u
S j-i ^-
w o o O
C Xi <u
■ ^ Q U
_ J fcai c/5 .
C/D C ^
^ C ^ •
1j . tJ
3 S ^
CJ
< S p^'
Sh •
too C
Appointments
717
CO CO CO ^ ^ ^ ^
CO GO CO CO
CO eo CO to CO
«C ^ ^ ' _L _L _L
Id Id IT) iCi
•> § S > 3
^ = Q
- ^ -
* Oh
O c
o
(U
ca
ooooooooooo
^tOCOCOCOCOi— iCD^COCO^
066666^60660
feC^^c^xc^c^c^lc^r(^fC^x(^xc^fCM
,^66666^^66666
2^ 1
o
o
tea
2
c
rs
O S
U
= S o ,bc g
P3
lU
c
c
o s- u O
Q "rt o
.2 °
Z ^
> -
0 ^
> ^
C 03
C a;
C 0)
6 c
O S3
u
O 0)
o -^^ .
^ a;
+j o
* S I-
3 -n i-J
5 • £
3; OJ ^
S o V (u
rg £
El's
o =
tn.by
C $
x; o
iSo .
1^
) 0)
I £
' a;
! £
5 c
03 * 01
•-<!)>
-u tn
r£^ ft
' 2 £
c -a c
go-So
: 3 Q>
II
,£
£ I'H
Cfl 1* V-
-is'
is"
' 'H •
1 <3 — 03
I O C3
^ u C <u
• <U OT3
C y
' X O
i-H ^
<U <U (U
•73 "13
(U QJ <U
01 01 <U OJ
0; ^
718
Papers of Terry Sanford
oooooooo
soooooooooooooso
to <o «p
6666000
80 eo 00 CO eo 00
CO to to <o to to to
05
00 00 00 CM
t>l CM
to
^•1
C CO V2
_ C C J3 ^ Oj
J3
H SSSScoeooOGCtOtO
. 4i'4iTti4<^^*9^ooob
g c^cvrcMOjitotototocyc^
<
o
pq
^ <u
o o - o o § - g
■c 0 S o to
flj
o o
S S o
43 U C3
to to to ^
00 00 00 00 ^
,-1 -H ^ — CO
T3 C O t3 'J
tC bCXi > > >
c ^ ■2j ■Si
U O o 5! 5 Q Q
»i (aj ^
^ c/5 w fcij d ^ >
on
to
h
so-
b
0
1
pq
u
H
2
STI'
Z
ill
t
ICA
ett
CHNl
Fay
bi
h
LE
>
>
<
Appointments
719
<o (O «o o
U <U (U
>^ >^
O «0 CO
in »^ lO
CM CM csr
csr csr
esse
OJ QJ OJ OJ
d a d
^ ^
C C C C
O O O O
C« W5
c c c c
o o o o
(>f CM
C C C US
O O O
to 00 K
C C C
S S S C
is
^
Prather .
W. Vick
th Finch
M. Hami
C. Lassite
Frederick
J. Mulhe
ley Aycocl
H. Gilber
ul L. Fie
E. Brewe
ubbard -j-
<U <D C
Gibsoi
Herbe
Mrs.
Claud
Charh
Claud
Marvi
C. Bn
Rober
Mrs.
Willia
P to
r S
: £^
TJ
o
c
S- 01 n
a* .ti c c
o <u
• . .
q; ^ ^
<4H o; a> 0> 11
o o w o o
m « o w o u u
■a 73 C '
■a T3 g '
0) (D O
Q>
o « a,
3 3 (U
I 13 73 T3 '
I a) aj
I 73 '
o
T3 73 g
(y O O ^
a) (Xj a; o '^-t
33333^3333
_ _ 8 S S
10 10 io Lc o
T3 73 73 73
OJ (U 0)
01 a> OP o; '
OJ Qj 0; (U
o; oj o; 01
O S S C ^ S S
720
Papers of Terry Sanford
«0 to ^ ^ to CO CD
vo iCi ift
CO CO CO to to CO
It
CD CO CO O CM CO CO
<K 00 (X 06 ^
— I ^ —1 ^ (M 00 00
QJ ffi ^ J3 > ^
CO ' CO CO CO 00
^ CT5 O CD CO CO
^ CM CM CM (M
06 06 06 00
rt «J <u OS
•Be ^ a Be
O O ^ U
> o
1/3 - '
CM
— ^ ^ CO
CO CO CD ^
00 00 00 CO
00 00 00
o
Ui
o
<
Z
<
Oh
o
G
06
O
fa
X
O
®3 CO CO CD 00 CO GO
W CO CO CO I I I
C A A CO CO CO
O O O ■ 1 ■
p ^ ^ ^ 00 00 00
H
2 c 25
030^
i o
6 - ^
flJ 42 C CO
.ti ^ bC O O C
u g 'c t; ^
?5 *^ S
S j= J2 o
CQ h S
LiJ
3 CD CO «p CO
H CO CO CO 00
3 (M CM CVI
c "J
« ^ ffi 'i. ^
c w ^ [jq
o !^
s« !h qj
£ s 2 ^
00
^ pa
Appointments
721
to to
CO CO GO eo <>x
<M Csr CM Csf A
(O CO CO ^o
CM 04 (M
!>• !>•
It:
^ "2
i) o
^ ^ e s 5^
S -a 43 ^
tT3 faD boii
* U ;5 w
O ^ ^- U ^
O 3 .5
< K DC < hJ
<u ^ ^
^ ^ ^ Oh
>^ >^ >^ <u
U ^ f-l >
3 3 3 O
-°
cfl PS
C/O CD C/2 f-
0 £
O
Si u
Sh 0)
SOI
O CO
52 S
o o
4) a)
" O 'frt CO "
Sims'"
i E-i ^ ft 0)
J i ^
O 3
3
S O < <
13 r T3
4) 0) J2 (U
01 <u X a>
0) 0) 3)
01
c
- .£?
O 1^
Hi
o
) C -73
I -t-J (U (1)
(73 N
<!' ^ U O 0) ,
0) Oi ^ S QJ 01 '
■ <^ «J r-
8 2 s ;z;
) 01 o o
i $ 3 3
O O m
3 3 0)
i I i i
722
Papers of Terry Sanford
Q X
I'l.
in lo xn ID
c u <u <u
g ^ its
U
C "5
C C (U
H
CM <>X , , ... _ «
O
^ ^ ;:3
U
« .
C3 ^
U .2i
erJ < S
o *
§1
2
s
oj
^ Oh
o *^
^ r: c/2
(u Si o 5
i ^
o
u
•5 S
O bC
i I S «■
:t2 Q
3
Oi Oi OX Oi
tJh
• i-( *H
psi »i ^ O
o «9 «p
■< 00 00
o
o o
O
Appointments
723
r- t>-
;0 to CO to
Ci
CTl <— I r— I i-^
CO CO CO CO
o <i o o o o o
c^p CO CD CO CO c!0 eo
CO CO CO CO CO CO CO
(30 00 CTi CT)
C C
p -i:
2 c
rt O O
u
US
c _^
O CT3
u u
8 2
rt O C O
^ i-< qj ^
(U O O
o M o
o . o
, ^ CO CO GO OO
f-H CO CO CO CO CO CO
CO
H O O O O H ^
CO CO CO CO CO CO
(U ^
5 111
ci3 cfl S
CJO
j; ? 0 I ? I
5 it
c 2 o
D
O
|i
u h2.q^ s :^ s «
^ CO o
.OS.
8 ^^Ph'oW ^
S
o .
£ •
<U CO
S.2 ^
^ o " "= ^
J2 O
3 73 73 73
) <U (V <Ji ■
3 T3 73 73
b o
c c
O p (u
000
W MO! i
, QJ Ji to « 0) 1
s 1 "421 1 i i
0 !> "-s ^
o
73 n3 73 73 c
01 0) 01 0) -t->
73 'O 73 T3 O
0) 0; 01 0) o
0) 0) 0) 01
O CJ O CJ
CJ O O O 0;
3 3 3 3 0;
724
Papers of Terry Sanford
X
CO CO to CO
o o o o o o
CO CO CO GO CO
CO CO to CO CO to
at
CO CO CO
CM CM
HI
e "J
TjH Tt^
J2 o o o o
t-l CM CNf CM
CO CO CO CD CO CO
1 ' ' ' CO CO
i:^ . .
CM CM Csr CM 00 00
,— 1^-^ WoOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO ^I:^t-.C-.J>.00 00
22 ©22222 "S- 22 ^
1 1 i 1 1 'I I IJI I ^
5^
CON
^ DC
(U
o
cj a
c3 o O
6a
,2 >
U W S cq ^ ^^DC J <
^^^^
c
o
S ^ c
13 'rt ^ X!
O O
5 ^
^ pi
J— <u
g id
S 2
u
O
pq o
O §
X o
w ^
u
n
O-
Appointments
725
TJ; TJI lO lO no ir>
CO CO to CO to
o o 6 6 C5 o
CO OO CO CO
CO CD to CO to CO
2^
ft .
7s:
CO CO «0
«o ,A
2 ft
S a;
s g ^
o !U
tn !
C
£ ^
PQ hH
55 U
St.
5
qti o
ra O
U
, ^ u ^
^ .ii .ii >
o - ? ft
'Mi
Et;
o
r-
: ^ s
Oh
a
t- •
U5 (M
03 o
-£ <
0) <U <U
(U V (V
i s o
3 D 3X
U5 O t- 00
S 3 S S
e S C
3 T3 ^ -a ^
T3 -a T3 '
a; (u (u 0)
T3 T3 '
(u (u a> 0)
0) (U tU 01
y CJ CJ y
O CJ CJ o
3 3 3 3
i i ci
726
Papers of Terry Sanford
ir, ^ CO r— 00
to ^ «5 «^ «0
or: so CO CO oo
c^r cli CM
80 OO OO CO GO CCi
-Jm ^ \C>
s s «?
in »n 2 J2
^ ^ tJH -r^i
GO CO oo
(M CM
^ (M OO
t£) CO CO CO CO
tJh m m >— ' ^
an
(M CO
^CO
CO C>1
ooob ^eocbcb^c^r
li
5°
C o
O O
O >H
3 s
JO
I P5 c/D W
a; w w z ^
O
O « U
CO CO c^r ox so c!o
.. to CO CO CO
Of OJI ^ ^
CM CM oC' 00 ob c»
(U to
o S
1/3
G Oh
2 S o o .5P b
PQ tti
> J ^
Pi c/i d
o
» cvr CO ^
CO ' ^
t/3 , — I CO
etf ^ CO so '
O CO CO
u ^ =^
< (M ^
> OJ
2 K 5
^ 2
. -G
o o o
C CI C
o| 2
^ o
OJ Sh
bO be qj
!-i CT3 f-
= .5 I
Appointments
727
o o o
c c c
tl >-l 1-1
d) <u <v
> > >
o o o
bo be bo
CO CO
CM w
J5 flJ
'C o
PQ en'
O V
o o o
OJ (U <u
U 1-, s_
3 3 3
W3 5« 05
nj
< < <
to CO tD
Cb CT) CT5
C^f
c c c
lU
g 1- c
C c« U
u
QJ O
< i3 ^
C ^ a;
CO
g
z
2
H — < ^ C^r CM
<; CO CO CO CO
p <6 6) 6>
y O C5
o
z
as
z
Q
Z
<
Hi
bplS o
c
o
.S o
< pq
^- Q
X) U C«
a S :s
'6
S c
11
O O
.5 3
o
ft o
ft^
2 S
(1)
^ g
0) (U
s =>
8^
01 ^
.
2 S2
O
O S-i
■5
O ,-1
S c ^
o
St
O
01 <i3
. s
Q P
. £ o' . .2 ^
g ?
S ° £ i
2 c
1°
O 0)
'o 2>
ft c
£•>
0)
£0
1 CO)a;-^-;^+j
he sh ^
01 4j
CO +^ CO
£-«<3
3 O cU
o .Si
he «
O c ^
c
S bJD C
be cs^_i
0) 0)
£ c "J
OJ S H
0; cS
Cm ^
" (U 0> • > «H Ii
73 O
, C
o S ^ 'I'
?, D3 i-ojraaojoJXi-kJ'tioi
o;Ctj)^^ctfcflM_>^^
£ 2 -n 5 1 ^ K ctf s ^
cS;^ O 0^ o ° o ^ oJS M fcj
x; 0^ cj 05 5 ■
? Oj (1> oj _§ -C '
0> 0* 0>
£ o ciJ
13 *^ Ti 111
rt^OJQ>a3223QJO)(U
^ ^ Si S ^ .2 S X
0) f«H +J y ^ o,
728
Papers of Terry Sanford
!>■ i:^
m ici m in
lO m m
«p
CO
CO
CO
CO lO
6
6
6
«p
«p
CM
00
00
00
oro
ille
oro
'illc
5
c
2
Add
3ldsb
^^nesv
reenv
B
X
)rgan
so
> « P .
=
• • . til • r ^ •
§ s d .^s w
42 3
e o to CO '
- 00 ^ £^ -
o
O
c
<
O
w
w ^ o c c
c/5
c
3
so:
. E CJ
K ^ > 5
— (NT CO CO
CO -H CM
00 lO CO
aj w c
5s"
c c
CTJ o
w cj (/;
^ ■« c
t/2 ^
C/5
CO c\r
■ CO CO ^
53 J< ^ ^
6 T
-H ^ r-, lO
e ^ n
S 2 S
t -5 '-S C
O O P3 "3
" ■ Pi , .£
6 :
b
O
Q
e£
•<
O
pq
o
n d^
CA ^3 3
^ 3
CO to CO CO
<m6 00
CM CO lo csr
ir> lo CO
CJ ^- o c
a; J C
O
i-lli.
„ O ^
i
3 C CJ
2 ^ - c
c c
Appointments
729
4) C
.2S
p.
to CO
I I CO CO ^
-H ^ (M CO CD ^
CD CO CO ' ' '
I . 1 OO CO
CO CO cn CM CM
00 00 ■'t' 05 05
o S c55 O ^« O
p ^
^ o S S o
CJ (U C
O i3 'J "-I
pii o w Q s :s
z
O ^ C^f
;j CD CO
S 05 CO
be ^
eo
■5 o
>» .
11
ft
.2 5
S M
S ^
O X
C rt O CO
ft>
O
to . tS
— o ^ >,
> <U o o
:5 o
1| "^1
" "S! 4) C
O S
00<l'0?ioo>tn-Q
<U lU <3) Qi (A ,n <U (U
«J<U<U<U ^lOiO'^c
0)00 c
OOOOjjFHCJOCUti
I-
s
O 0^
5 o
S 2'
> o
>. O O
o o
+^ O c
bit -u
£
^ C 0)
■2^ 8 ^
.S g (U S >>
ft^ £ «T3
03:5
^ C!3 C u
£ ft- C «
_0 0) c
>. O 3 c s
« a* cos
to • > m £ c 2
S 22 £ £
Ifi ^. C ^ 01
WO
o o>
iiililiii
CMC . o
^ " C b3 M "
O o " o 0)
3 3 X 3 ^
2ft
ft
O s-
C o
it
0. ^
J3
^ .5
o ^cc
ft* .
ft (U rs
£3
- i rr
_2 OJ g
>i ft+j
£ g
o . C
o w ts
c u
o o
■■^ £
3
CS 0)
g ^.S £
M 3^
0)
I C ^
'fS^ £
sills
Q,-^ C , rt O tc •
. -7-1 •« S
0) U 0) 0) 0) ■ °°
'^a'S'S^o SO<<i)oi<uo)^rr;
^ " " ^^1 o « « S g S ^ .
Siiii|p3iiii ^1
730
Papers of Terry Sanford
w ^ in in »n
Tf< Tfl
CO
4, Ift Xf5 to CO
to ^ to CO CD to
oo CO CO so
!>. I>.
m lo IT) ifj lo >r> If)
04 CM CM Csr (M CM
to CO
l-H •—1
^ "? T
CO I>- CO
CO < CO
^ 1=1 J=
w o
o ^
o
— I OvT (^^ CO CO
CO CO CO CO CO
4i CO CO 05 cfi ^
C» CO CO — I ^ 00
^ a c B
bc q t! 5 St:
c
.>-< 1) --H
5i
U
o
f-i (M CO CO
CO CO CO CO
O 00 m C5 C5 (O) 05
o bp
EC "C o
4J C X c
5 S
(72
c o
x: c
tn .t! O
PS - I— 1
h t:
W ^ S ^
J-
'S X oj §
CO
CO CO
fJ C/2
Appointments
731
t>. i>
if) If)
«0 O CO
CO CO CO
CO CO CO CO CO
° b
p. tfl
OS c
be
56 ^
V (1>
> ■(->
Is
o
ft
Cvl CO eo
CO «p <o to
0 Cl ffl^
^ ^ ^ "7
01 00 00 CO
J5 x; J- oj
bc.5ic be o
*C ^ *C c
is
53 CM c^j
« CO CO CO
Z UN UN UM UN ^
M tOOCOCOCOCOCOCO
^ CM clf olr Cv| CM CM o
CMCMC^C4C^CMCMC^
|5 O W) ^ o o bcS
U -C S S q5
5 O
* s * ^ J3
«j - ^ S
• a; •
w .^a,^ o a: ^
g So
£ C •-
o3 o
S .
^ S
o S
03 S
u
o ^
> a>
o >.
14 A
o ^
O S
u
tC ^ O =« S S ^'
> 2 >. S . ho
C ^ u) 73 TJ si Ti
o 2^
|l5
T3 C
I?
• « be
« to "
ft .
P. CO
J3 C-
goo
QW S ft
T3 73 §
. V 0) 01 S v
J -a T3 13 o
I <U <U 0) u (U
(J 0) (u <u " 01
= 00050
^ D 3 3 -C D
5 S S a
"13 O
ft-°
; « c
ill
-■■1%
I ft
■ S-i ft
^cg:S
o o
0 01 'j:;
CD ^ ft
•~ 01
2 - >
5 CO CC
- % c
01 S to
M CO
03 . 0)
v."
33coj;o;0)o30>;.
-/^ «v» ^
B P g -eg
732
Papers of Terry Sanford
CO
CO
CO
CO
cip
CO
in
CO
Tfl TtH
CO CO CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
cr>
CO
CO
CO
eo
CO
or>
CO
4i
CO
41
CO
CO
CO CO CO
to CO CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
00 05
CO (O CO
CO
CM
CO
CO CO
CO
CM
CO
CM 04
CD CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
ifl lf5 lO
CO CO
CM CM
CO CO CO
CM
CO
CM
CO
l>-
I>-
CTi
CT)
!>■
J>- !>. I>-
!>.
1>
00
00
00 00
00
00
00 00
00
00
00
00
00
00 00 00
00 00 00
00
00
CM rtH
CO CO
• I to
-7 6^
> > T
o
-a.
£ - c
cfl
U (J h4
5g
'I
O ^
a
z
<
u
Z
<
H
<
CO
CO CO O
CO CO
CO
CO
CO
CO CO CO
CO
eo
CO CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO CO CO
CO
CO
CM CM
iM (M
(M
CO
CO
to
<M CM CM
CM
CM
CO CO
yp CO
CO
(>S
iM
CM
Tj- Tf
to CO CO
CO
CO
to
CO
CO
to
to
CO CO CD
CO CO
CO
CO CO
(O CO
CO
6
<6
6
6
6
6 6 6
CO CO CO
CO
s
CO
CO
CO CO CO
i>-
1>
00 00
00
00 00
00 00
00
00
00
00
j>- j>-
00 00 00
00
00
2 o on3 — •'^•^-
qj w OJ O Sh
C C
in P
c
o C ^
O
3 ^ c«
*
O O C
. ^ S OJ — S- w ;-j
^^^^
E ^ c p
.s ^
V « e
la
o o ^
< ^ C/3
o ^
. O
O O 0!J
2 b
Appointments
733
in in
in
to CO
to
to
^ -^^
CO <X3
«p
CO
so CO cjo
CO
CO
CO CO to
to
to
lo in
CM C4
CO «p>
CO CO <JD
to
CO
!>■ i>-
!>■
ab 00
00 00 00
00
oc
to to
c^^c^rc^^cM<^^cM(^IC^t!Ococoooc^oco
tototototototototocotocototo
COOOOOCOCOOOCOCOC^CvrCvfOJCMCM
56 .
o w
o
c
a*
o S
eg
35 £
c ea
a; O
t o
CO to
to
CO
CO CO
cso
CO
CO to
to
CM CM CM
CM
CO to to
to
CO to to
to
t-^ !>. !>.
00 00 00
00
oc
^ c
cn ra ^
O
u o ^
CO to
CO CO
CO to ^
(M CM
to to
^^^p-li-H,— — cmcvicmc^jcmc^
tototocototototo^tocotocoto
SOOOoOCOOOCOOOCOCMCMCMCMcmC-J
S- w I— I
3
o ^
be
C 52
U
o
a;
c
o
2 !^ o 5
- =^ t e '-^l ffi 'o u ^ c^
T3
^ o cu
U S ■
He;
p.
SO."
1
0) tc
p.
+5 j*.'^
ft o
^ o ^
O O Qi
ft °t:
ft -
0) o '
c«":S7
£ra ^
(1)
13 ft^
J2 CO
O . cn 9
o c .
^ M ft
pq T3 tt
d ool^^ o § -
(uSlft aibiJ^
, ^ a;
; S J.
734
Papers of Terry Sanford
^ in xci
05 cr>
J>. !>.
CO CO CO <M CM ■
j>. t-L
to XT)
CO yp
4l
CO CO ^
eo ^
«p S «^
CM CM CM
(Si to ^ ^
' 1 • CO
CO CO 0^ ^
t-^ t^. !>.
in m lo irj kf)
so eo
•S
5
s
6 ^
C 43
OS
c
O (H
O U
■ ^ 2
NSC
■5^0
— ' —I IM
«p c£) «o CO Tf-
CO CO CO c '^ C^X ^
t-^
bo ^
be 2 -o o
• r- rrl
CO CO to
1 1 1 CO
CO eo CO 1
^ _ ^ cn
!>. 1>- 1>-
2 M
CO «o to to to
^ ^ ^ ^ ^
T3 ^ -a
t,
!L) C qj
^ J3
S u
> (U
c pq
O
P S
re
C/2
. t/3
< ^ ^ u
4' '4-
U
Ui
<
o
z
O
z
3
o
PQ
o
4iS ^
a cT
bo be
C C
^ bc be
^ c c
ZOO
o « rt
ts
. o
O ^
'o ^
X u
Appointments
735
•5
O .S
3S
to ^ to ?0 to
•^iTtiT^COCOtOOCO
m 10 ^ lO iTl 10
si
8 +2
o
ft .
3^
^^^00000
cd d CuDhCUD-iCLi
GCCOOOOO
.S QD CO cn C/D c/3
&0 bO bO
C C G
000
« M eq
^ ^ ^ * ^
H frt 3 ^ c« ^
^ XI ^ XI ^ ^ ^
y u u u o u u
J5 cti rt rt cs
U qj qj (U aj (U QJ
cq cq pq « pq pq pQ
5f bO bO bC bO bO fa£)
C c c c- c c C
9000000
H-lj J J h-J hJ
O (M
CO > 00
IS-
03°
. o
I* o <V>
dJ O m
i G =0 i
o (u 2 ^
. ^^^^
w ^ ui ui ^
P
go
U y y 0)
CC M M Eh
O « es
0/^ rt
i
1 So .
si f
www
5 9 5
at- g
.
0 . .
1 jh^<w
g 73 13 73
g "J 73 73
O . (U <U QJ
y _ O) (U (y
c y U U
K> U O V V
.2 (U 3 3 3
w WW w
5 ij5 5 ^
-S
3 3 3
www
5 S S
736
Papers of Terry Sanford
CO CO CO CO CO CO
in ^ iO m m
ooeoeoeocovr5iC)>r^ifi»o
CT; CT; Cri ^ ^
lO ^ »0 ^ ^ IlO lO
05 05 CTi
!>• !>.
O «p «p
^ yi> C£)
pqpqpQPQPQPQPQPQ
QJ D 9J U 4J
c c c c c c
C3
(U QJ QJ (U QJ
oooooooo
a; u
o
o 'C
AS
<l) Si
^ Az
QJ 4J OJ 5J flj
o o o ^ o ^
p3 cj cti
J3 J3 ^ J3 ^
^ ^ xn ^ ^ ^
£0
- I
uj w S 12; « J
II
(Si S Oh
U U U [X-
3 S 3
CD CD
J< ^
OJ <u <u
^ ^ ^
►3 .3 J
<U (U u
^ ^ ^ ^
p3
h4 ^ ^
aj Qj flJ u flj flJ
J3 J3 -C3
XI XI X!
^^^^
. o
^ o
I— ( OJ ^ 05 w
^ ^ ffi 5 5= ^ ^•
.5 S
Appointments
737
O 01
1^
ft .
13 tn
O t« .
by goT
•So-
Tf< o ?o to to
j>.
x: x: x: s:
(J (_) (J U o u
c3 rt
qj (U oj oj oj aj
cq fQ CQ pq PQ CQ
(jj <Li flj nj u aj
X ^ j=i ^
bo be be bo be faO
^^^^^^
CO CO <0 CO
CO CO ^ C50
J3 J5 -C ^
U CJ u u
cj
D aj <u <LI
eq cq « P3
c c c c
o o o o
a, a, cih Oh
3 3 3 3
C3
>H >^ >^ >^
b r-
d u w ^
o <v
ft >>
.2 c
? °
ii ft
a; ft
ft^
P
03 O O
o (u <a>
<4-( C -OH
O 3
c .-
3 be
^ 5 +i
bo
C 03
b« 2 §
2 £
c £
£
c3 ,2
5 bc?3
°£
O
fa
£
3 CO
0)
O c Sh O
o "5
^ . ^ =
ii
S "o T3
ft C
ft CS
o
u ^
^ C
£.2
a; o
> ^ Q)
O 0) C
bjx _o
dJ c
c d
- 0) qj ^,
"^■^ ft«H
^ u cs o
. o
W 0)
£^"
7"^
2 ^ e
1 5£ S
i 0) r
3^
S 1
to-C
1. »^ ^ ^ • •
■a >- >> c
3 T3
2J 0.
-.4/ ^ CI
T3 -a 5 SH .
_ ? -a T) 2
• • to 0) O o
ft t. *
3 -73 :S ^ T3
> <U <U 01
c^i w H M
:t = "f^ <
' tn ^ <u oi
CCucj.^cooo
.OcdooOJcHOioy
T3 y ,•
(D (U ^ O; I;
^3 73 rQ ;h O
0) <U >.
0) 01 flj g c3
S S S o £
333ft
W M2 M t2 ;§
S S o £ ,
.
^^£S
fad
- o >.
Is
ca "o!
2 w
0!^
o gW
.22 -5 u
£.£
^ c3 J
S 8 g E
£2^ S
738
Papers of Terry Sanford
TfH CO to
to CO to
CTl
s
•2
iO CO
X
CO <o
2 2
s . .
OJ S-( i-c
cj (u <u
qj ^ X!
Q e e
<u a;
o tj u
O (U OJ
■a
c
T3
w C C
o o
S
o o
CO CO
in
GO CO
to
to
CO CO
to
CM
6
QJ (U <U (U
C *C *c 'c
tn tc tc tc
QJ U <U (U
T3 -O -O
C C C C
s s s s
t-H >H iH il
<U <U OJ (U
Hhhh
M «
C C
o o
a. c-
3 3
^ C C
2 o o
.Sec
o oj aj
^ J
3 Si
c
S "2
TH QJ
j3 3 u
Z c«
<
S
CO to
(M c\r o
g U U U
O Si >-i ^
^ ^ jj jj
t« cJo (y5
^■^ to ~
so
to CO
to
to
CO S
S
6
6
CM
INT
CM
Q
o
u
W QJ QJ
s e
o o
"3 .1:
QJ <^
3 ■
O cs
o
u
><
H
3
O
u
Q
<
Q
<
c
>^
o
H
h
<
h
O
:z;
to to to to
lo in in
CM (M (M (M
X X ji; —
QJ 'C 'C hU
5 5
c ^ W
Appointments
739
*c 'S 'c *S 'c "c 'c "c 'c 'c 'c *c 'c
ccccccccccccc
seesseseessse
HhhhhhhhHHhHh
I I I 1 1 fO 1
cs(CMCsjcsrcMCMCNfc^rcsr(MC\rcn —
. ^ 2 « 3 ^ i2
CO u
5* O
«2i
o
o
3 3
O
o
3 C
Qo
P.
ft
4- ^,
a> >. o
— " «o t;
■ -< 2^ ^
to £ , • <u ■
: s 13 ^
(fl ^- >
• - 0) o ,
= c bc<
. CO
WW
0) <D "
o o
3 3;^
{C ^ (0 CO
= ft
■S ^ o
"S a a; ° bi'
01
Mm
ft
W 5'
So £
3 0^
c
13 ft 2
5
ft
3 P
ft >, t« -M
Hi cS
C 3 in
g-^
llljlll
.i; — b M <D o
o c CO f3 i: .t: r
g c g •!= cs ^
(y O
"I' >. o ««
-° ^ c o c D
* c« s- S
111
n irt ^ o
, 1-1 g; C
S c
£ o
a< 2 5 =5^
X5 O
01 CO
3
»r c c o; . •=
<1> »7- C O
01 ■* o 'o
• 1j i_i J:
.£-S
. 0)
f f- C >
cc O
o '3 w
:S ^ 5 0) ' !^ c
S (0 +J C ro " '
o 5 -55 S ■
■ S o 2 o-S-S-O'
^•^'S'g^ £ £ «
S -a o £
c c 0)
3.0
fttC
740
Papers of Terry Sanford
OOCOCOCOCOCOOOOOCOOOOOOOGOOOOO
ooooooooooooooo
5 2 -
c::::^U
o
^ w ^ CD
Oh ^
U
^ o o
(u C OJ <u
s-< 3
C
OJ OJ
Oh C
« o
>
o ^
13 .2
C/l I 1
V} f— I
s
g 2 cu
3 <U
C,3 . U >U TO "
CIh pii X cii S
_ ^ c/5 c c
<U rt 2
X I§ to E
O
to CO
<v
S § i c S <u
c ^ * U
R3
3
Appointments
741
5 >>
■ o <u
3 .2 ^
O S-,
2h£
CM (M cvr cvr
7^ Q
(U (U OJ
S :5 be
3 > oj
be
c
.2' .-S ;^
EC • i-H s-i =
O ^CMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCM
o
o
c« .
K
^ cvic^fcycMCMCMcycycMCvf
< 2
■> 5 ffi ^ ^ J ffi ■>
^ c ^«
• ;n 0*
s ^
ctf C o
OH g
01
—
SS5 ''•So
O tfH P. >
O O rt" >> c
a 0) ■ -a
03 4)
C O
3 O tfl to <U
-to +-> «tH — 1) 01 -Q
c ^ o S ^ "55 o!
0)
^ a; cs
oj C >.
f= §
cl
'-t^ 5
$ 35 «
c S 0.
OJ 0^ -s
5^ °
'2 _^ 01
^i:
a; °
O 3
CO
^ C <U
3 S-(
as .
•3g^
■ T-
Q) ? O OJ
O C 5
> OS !>
0)
to CS CO o CO .2 fr|
.2 Q c
5 S.c
s
<u c £ c ^
^ '-^ I W O CO -J
c Qj h (u 2
t; ^ 3
» s- ^ CO
°.B £ o^
5 oj ^ ^
-2 o > X ^
- °'g £
CO to to
CO
lo 0) o; 3
^^•5 go
i ^ ^
M s ^
^ 0) O ^ rH
to ^ '73 to
S ^
3 cs £ 3 3 -3 jS
CO o> 2 X CO
llri
o M u • ^
p _g 3 C
742
Papers of Terry Sanford
s
"iJ ^ CNT CM Cvj (>X Csr CM (M CM 04 CM
Q -vL, 111111 I Ct
Qx -7^ -r 'T T T T '7 G
OJ OJ u
CCCCCCCCCGC ccc
T3 T3 Td -O -O 13 T3 -O T3 13
cccccccccc
ssssssasses ges
HHHhhHHHHhh hhh
r3t« ^!«Sij;(«w:<uajc>C5
C/5
*-i ii "
6o£
«3 ^ C O
o (T3 <l; « .
^.CJ < J K h
2 «
. 3
i2 <^ "5
S E
o o
s: s:
• - b E S be- biD:2 bc-3
■ '.5u
E c
a; ^
c<
E oj
c
c o
O
c« O
3 C
O
2^
3 rt 73
<u A u
(/3 1
T3 ;
o ^
t/3 O
> P3
D
<
Appointments
743
*C 'c *c 'c 'c 'c 'c 'c '£ 'c "c "S "c 'c 'c 'S '£ "c 'c 'c 'c 'c "c *c 'c 'c 'c 'c 'c 'c
qjQjiljQJQjQjaj(Liaj(U(U(UQJQjaj<U(UCJQJ(UQJ^JQJQJIUiL)<L)(U(L)iL»
CCCCCCGCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCGCCC
o:5
HHHhhHHHhhhhhhhHhhHhHHhhhhHhhh
CO GO rf
e«<r5coooco(sooooo«ooooocncoooooeoooooeocnoocooocoto -^Tj-irt<co
C^J Cvi C^X C^I CM C^J C^J C^X C^l C^J Cvt C^J Csf
.i .Jk ,A r,^ ,A ,A ,A ,A ,A ,A ,A ,A ,A ,A ,A ,A ,A ^ ^ ^ ^ in ob ob ob ^
O <u
O
ii
n «3
^ -c ^-c c o ^ ^ -c ^ 5 o g ^ ^ ^ ^ -c ^ > S
c c
O
^ o o o ^
6S
a;
2 So
CP u
3
cn' pq ^
T3
8 S
0:4
O
j3
<u
Six
-5 3 sv.
faC<
u O C E
1 03
la
c 2
o r^:
Q .
C >
'So 2
Q p, i-l ^
la
a; c
12; o
o "
P,73
C CO c O
c3 tC "Xi S c
C a; >- S
$ E S o
3 01
o p
c o
p ft «:
a; ft o a; -goo
S £
744 Papers of Terry Sanford
CTi 05 05 Oj CT) en O 02 Cr. 03
<v u <u <u
OJ OJ <L) OJ
>>>>■>>>>>>
oooooooooo
bcbcbobobcb^;bcbcb^)bcfacbcbcfaOb^)
QJ QJ CU CJ <U QJ
> > > > >
o o o o o
<3
Q ^
z z,
ooooooooooooooo
pj; OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
< D-i!XD-0-QhCl,£X£1hCX0-,CL,0-CX,Q-,CL
o
u
^ ^ ^ J. ^ J. ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
ti 3
„ - 5J Ml ^ l-H
U i i U : □
§-•■2
o
.0 c
S 2
^ c
: u
u
XI
^ K ^ < 15 H
u ^ u • ° ^
c
o
^ fas'?
- ^ o
o
J2 dJ
o x:
Q U
s
.2 Q .2
pq ffi A. J
§ '5 t: p5 2 ^
„ „ o .
— ' ^ ^ <v ^ t: ^ ^
•^^iro>3rt':2CT3
V o
c
O M
^ o S
-5 ?:
pq 2
I C
s5
o
^ "5
o pq
u
i-H ^
pq i
3
I—
B d
u 3
pq
u
S Si
O
> i_ T3 J,
t:-^ 2 «
ffi * ^ S ^ 3
c ^ K ;2 3 .
Appointments
745
(U Oj (U (U
> > > >
o o o o
o o o o
CLi Oh Oh CI.
qj <u <u <u
(M CM CM
'o «p yp ^
c^i m
51
bO O
o
S 1^ " '
; W >^
n:H^pJr3o.TH3<u<uajHHH
3 i
X M C I
tt] u C '
^ o O r ^
C
o U
tH tuo.^ ■
,0 K H^c^
s
1^ s
1^1
u '
X
<LI Q —
1^ o
o
•5 o o s
0) ® i-„ C
"J P3 ^ r o
to cS _ S
0, S s -2
tn C ? O m
O CS O hH
.E-5 5
o
C m Q)
S o o x;
> o be
2^ o
o
cs 0) M r*
QJ +3 _ '^3 ''^
s-i " ^ i-i
V S 2 I »
T3 S a; ^
(u o n ^ c
T3 a; ttf o cs
^ W) O > 73
^ 5 .2 ^
b 0) ^ . t*H
Co p, 5 fi
°3 fc* P a fli
0) p. 'S 3 o
XI R <U q3 ft ft
cs ^ a> QJ ^1
o
+^ ft'^-g.ti
^'^1 - S o
a; 3 rv,
S H -S e a;
^^I^^l ft
o iH 5 . o i .
Cfl ft ft >'k2
^ (U T 3 .'ti <
o ^ ft 5 -
<D .. 3 > =^
-5 ft .£ c e >.
.2 ?^ oP.S ^
0) ^ ^ o - S
ft z; 3
O i2 w "ti ft
•w -S >, g g a;
w 01 Sh ^ ^ r; a;
ft C S bC.S'G
C . ft Ic
J 3 CS > ft
•5 !^ ft ft O
•2 « -5 oj g g
.■ti o c« o -5 § X
ft ft „, Or*"
3J > +^ O ~; -
i ft ^ 3 < "2
tills
<v o 01 o ^ X,
11^ illl
746
Papers of Terry Sanford
Appointments
747
■£-'c 'c 'c "c *G "c 'S "c 'S *S 'S 'c 'c *S *£ 'S *S 'S *S *c "c 'S 'S 'S *c 'S 'c
CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
^^S-lVH>M»HVHS-i;-lSHi-ll-l{H^}-lSH!HtHMS-l»H)HSH«-li-llH>-l>H
hHHhhhhhhhHhhhhhhhhHHHHHhHhh
o c
^H ^ o
O O CM
tn U) ^
« " >J
I I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I CO CO CO CO
oooocoooooc^^c^rc^^c^^c^rc^^c^rc^^c^rc^rc^^c^c^tc^^c^^c^x(^^(^^<^l
748 Papers of Terry Sanford
CC i_is-(!H!-(S-(S-i!-iS-iSH^s-i!-cs-ii-i>-ifcHS-i;-i CCCCCCCCC
m ^ oooooooooooooooooo y3y3tctx:cx:y3tx:yHtis
s ££££££££££££££££££ ---^----^
o ^ .S >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .«
c oooooooooooooooooo
If- Is ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ oj a; oj oj oj oj <u oj a;
s-i)-(;-ii-i)-(;-(S-(i-ii-(;Hi-i;-(S-ci-ii-ii-i)-(^
oooooooooooooooooo
a, cu cu CL, a, Oh CL, a, a, cu a. CL, Oh CL
^ 6
c & ^ x: ^ c^sx
2 ^ o -5 o o ffi -c DC ^ -
(.H L^ C f-H ^
^^i^ SQ CQpC c|
c
u 3
. u
h
II
> ^
^1
c
o
c
(U
c
2
to -P
S s >
^ o ^
.2 c
g c ^ o
I— 1 ^
is"
cq S w
. J- W J5
W . C ~ ^ ~
^ U < O w <
s
c^c^JC^^c^xc^r(^^(^J(^^<^l
o
u
o
o
s
u
<^ 03 _
z U U ^
OJ OJ C ^ (U (U
g bo= w
O ^ ^ 'jj ■> ^
03 3
B
si)
o ^
03 C
-2 «
3 U
c
c
3
«3
£ o
c 5 M
^ c ^ "
3 03 <^
PQ M hJ
Appointments
749
'S c 'c 'c "c 'c 'S 'c 'c c 'c c 'c c '5 'S 'c *2 'S 'c '£ 'c 'c *S
•S .S .S .S .S .S .'^ .5 .S .5 S ~ .5 .'^ .5 P P .S .S .S
ssssssssssEsesssgaassesa
SH)H(Hi--ii-iSHMSM)-lj-l)HSH>H;H;HSHSHi-i(--i(-l)-(!-l^llH
HhhHhHhhhhHHHhhHhHHHHhhH
OJ (U qj
*C C 'c
qs q= q=
(U qj (u
-O T3
C C C
£ S £
<u <V dj
(U to
^ i
<u o
. £
<u
s g
ft 0)
MM
CO
0)
3
h o
4) W
'T'T''T'T''T'T''7T''7T''T*'^T'^'T'^'7T'T''T'TT'T'^
o p X o
C X! ^ C
^ o
-- 1" O 1^ f3
CD
c w S
Is 2 ^
t'H ^ w
<1J S > >H .
W < <
o — _
c c c
£ 2i ^ Q
- 2 5 S -5 13 g c
C b 22 ^ ><
- O
• rt qj —
^ bc£
OS-
° ^- C ^ .J -
a -T
^ vj ^ c:^ 4—) (i-H w uj
O ^
^£
s-i O
S 2 £
3 C 3
••^ I— :
hu
£ o
£'£
5£
J <0 CO CO
U CO to to
5 CM CM (>X
S ^ 2
o ^ .
•5^
S a* £
C C " O
o i; +^ ts
>><4H _2
OO o
cS ft
in OJ '-I
c o ft o
"6 o
(uO c o
O 0) M
oo £
Si ^ A t
£-0
be ^
o
£ I
^< 01
tl
cs
CS o
0) o
,
0) '
o Oi t«
I* S
o 8
. ft
0) ftT)
3
o CO rt
o ' o
■5 ft ^•
£ ^
9 o
O 05
0^ 3 ^
■ ^ £"
(1) £i
^ J3 0>
750
Papers of Terry Sanford
Q X
'c *S 'c 'c 'c 'c "c "c 'c *C
cccccccccc
Hhhhhhhhhh
■so
to
CM
CO «o «p «p
to «i) <o
CM C4 CM
CO CO
^ ^ CO CO
tooto^^
CO <0 to t>J CM
CM CM 4" Tt«
g2
C oj o OJ fl c
o
u SiU o|
^ ^ Oh . O
a:
^ g ^
o o
s X
03
O -
X ^ =2 ^
< oj: ^ ^ o
. o
5 o
< tu
o
Index
A
A. B.C. Law Enforcement Officers Associ-
ation, speech to, listed, 504.
"A" Budget, 12, 15, 16, 18, 68-72, passim.
AFL-CIO Convention, speech to, listed,
509.
A.M.E. Church Conference, speech to,
listed, 516.
Abbott, Carrie P., lOln.
Abernethy, G. Shuford, 726.
Abernethy, Jim, 733.
Abernethy, Mrs. John M., 664, 679.
Adams, Guy, 126n.
Adams, Kirkwood Floyd, 695n.
Adams, Mrs. Martha M., 727.
Adler, Richard, 447, 447n, 712.
Administration, Department of, 17, 210,
603; appointments to, 652-653; Long-
Range Planning Division of, 633-634;
Property Control Division of, 525.
Advancement School, xxix; addressed by
Sanford, 467-468; as LINC demon-
stration project, 612; in planning stage,
395; purpose of, 486.
Advisory Budget Commission, appoint-
ments to, 656; bond issues examined
by, 186; educational concerns of, 94,
299; educational funds approved by, 84,
208-210, 346; recommendations of, 11-
25, 31, 67-74.
Advisory Committee on Tuberculosis, 46.
Advisory Council on Mental Retardation,
359, 379, 380, 589; appointments to, 691-
692.
Aeroglide Corporation Plant, speech at,
listed, 520.
Aging, discussed, 616-617.
Aging, Governor's Coordinating Commit-
tee on, 616; appointments to, 738-739.
Agribusiness Caravan Luncheon, ad-
dressed by Sanford, 167-168; speech to,
listed, 505.
Agricultural and Technical College, ad-
dressed by Sanford, 167-168; speech to,
pointments for, 710-711.
Agricultural economy, improvement of,
XXX vi.
Agricultural Hall of Fame, directors for,
656.
Agricultural . . . "Highlight Week," ad-
dressed by Sanford, 109.
Agricultural Migrants, Committee on, 44,
238.
Agricultural Opportunities Program, 164,
205, 252; functions of, 36, 167.
Agriculture, discussed, 108-113, 159-165,
167-168, 266-273, 430-431; improve-
ments in, 205, 252; problems of, 111-
112, 351-352; programs relating to, 376;
progress of, 457-458; research in, 269,
350; statistics on, 163, 167; surpluses
in, 112, 161-162.
Agriculture, Association of State Depart-
ments of, speech to, listed, 515.
Agriculture, Commissioner of, 164-165,
653.
Agriculture, Department of, 17, 205, 273,
401, 483; appropriations for, 22;
assists with food processing program,
457, 473; operates Raleigh Farmers
Market, 23, 36; works with N.C. State
School of Agriculture, 36, 272.
Agriculture, School of, see N.C. State
College, School of Agriculture.
Agriculture, State Board of, appointments
to, 656.
Agriculture, U.S. Secretary of, address
by, 175.
Agriculture Committee, U.S. Senate, 160.
Agriculture Council Joint Program,
speech at, listed, 499.
Agriculture Export Expansion Workshop,
speech at, listed, 517.
Agriculture Extension Conference, speech
at, listed, 504.
Agriculture Fund, 15, 22, 72.
Agriculture Subcommittee of U.S. House,
speech to, listed, 517.
Ahepa, addressed by Sanford, 215.
Aid to dependent children, 21.
Aiken, E. T., 680.
Aiken, Earl L., 720.
Ainsley, William F., 711.
Airborne Association, reunion of, ad-
dressed by Sanford, 276.
Akers, John McCorkle, 670.
Alamance, Technical Institute of, trustee
appointments to, 711.
Alamance County, study of handicapped
children in, 591.
Albemarle, College of the, 125; dedication
ceremonies at, 192; trustee appoint-
ments for, 711-712.
Albemarle, Southern Convention, ad-
dressed by Sanford, 307-308.
Albemarle Area Development Association,
addressed by Sanford, 398.
Alcoholic Control, State Board of, ap-
pointments to, 657.
Alcoholics Anonymous, 113, 553; in prison
camps, 204.
Alcoholism, rehabilitation from, 204.
Aldridge, Thomas Victor, 657.
Alexander, Atwell, 660.
Alexander, Fred C, 661n.
Alexander, James Atwell, 656.
Alexander, James M., 690.
752
Index
Alexander, Mrs. W. S., 717.
Alford, Dallas L., Jr., 59, 59n, 697.
Alford, Paul, 662.
''All-American City" Luncheon, cpeech at,
listed, 518.
Allen, Bruce B., 704.
Allen, James, 667.
Allen, John L., Jr., 653.
Allen, L. W., 741.
Allen, Mitchell, 732.
Alliance for Progress, promotion of, 555.
Allstate Insurance Company, speech to,
listed, 498.
American Association for State and Local
History, addressed by Sanford, 365-366.
American Association of Junior Colleges,
addressed by Sanford, 406.
American Association of School Admini-
strators, addressed by Sanford, 319-320.
American Bar Association, endorses
breatholizer test, 586.
American Heart Association, report of,
416.
American Legion, speeches to, listed, 494,
500, 514.
American Medical Association, endorses
breatholizer test, 586; tobacco research
of, 405.
American Nazi Party, "Hate Riders" of,
xxxiii-xxxiv.
American Public Welfare Association, ad-
dressed by Sanford, 365.
American Symphony Orchestra . . . Coun-
cils, addressed by Sanford, 440-449.
American Tobacco Company, 321, 459.
Anderson, Donald B., 744; pictured, fac-
ing 611.
Anderson, E. G., 694.
Anderson, John L, 696.
Anderson, Paul M., 686.
Anderson, Mrs. Stella W., 672; serves as
presidential elector, 528.
Andrews, Billy Earl, 677.
Andrews, Ike E., 656, 687n.
Andrews, Ralph James, 52, 52n, 738.
Andrews, W. H., Jr., 6S5n.
Anson County, conservation district of,
194.
Anti-poverty program, xxxii-xxxiii, xxxvi,
426, 428, 614-616; see also N.C. Fund,
Poverty, War on Poverty.
Appalachian region, bill concerning, 433;
program for, 419; White House meet-
ing on, speech at. listed, 513.
Appalachian State Teachers College, 83-
84; addressed by Sanford, 241; trustee
appointments for, 712.
Appointments, list of, 651-750; number
of, 206.
Appropriations Acts, House commended
for passage of, 548; salary adjustments
fund of, 51.
Aquatics Recreation Study Commission,!
appointments to, 657-658.
Archer, John, 693n.
Archie, William C, 64, 64n, 612, 674, 744;;
pictured, facing 611.
Architecture, Board of, appointments to,t»!
724-725. !
Archives and History, Department of, 17, f
209, 445; Executive Board appoint-
ments for, 658; history of, 365; peace
officer appointments for, 658.
Archives and History-State Library;.
Building, 56, 209; appropriation for,}'
23; ground-breaking ceremonies, speech I
at, listed, 515.
Archivists, Society of American, ad-ll
dressed by Sanford, 365-366.
Area Development Organization, speech I
to, listed, 496.
Area Redevelopment, Governor's Confer-i
ences on, speeches to, listed, 510. i
Armfield, Claude, 712.
Armory Commission, appointment to, 658.8
Armstrong, W. T., 689. 1
Art, Museum of, see Museum of Art.
Art Society, State, 56, 442, 445; director;)
appointments for, 659.
Arts, state's role in promotion of, 441- 1
449; see also School for the Perform- 1
ing Arts.
Arts and Cultural Development Act, 539.1
Arts Council, State, appointments to,R
740; establishment of, 538-539.
Asheville Agricultural Development Coun-^
cil, 433.
Asheville-Biltmore College, 84, 298; speech ]
at, listed, 496; trustee appointments
for, 713.
Asheville-Buncombe Technical Institute,?
trustee appointments for, 713.
Asheville Chamber of Commerce, provides
western residence for Governor, 614.
Asheville Industrial Education Center,!
speech at, listed, 503. ]
Association of American Universities, a
239; N.C. members of, listed, 592;?
U.N.C.'s admittance to, 174.
Association of U. S. Army, addressed by
Sanford, 102-106.
Atkins, J. Leslie, Jr., 685, 715.
Atkins, J. M., 715, 717w.
Atkins, James W., 659n.
Atlantic and North Carolina Railroad, ap-H
pointments for, 732-733.
Atlantic Beach, appointments for, 734.
Atlantic Christian College, 125.
Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Com-
mission, appointment to, 659.
Index
755
Atomic Energy Advisory Committee, 46;
appointments to, 660.
Atomic Energy Commission, U.S., 569,
593.
Attmore, Mrs. Taylor B., Jr., 681.
Auman, Clyde, 671.
Austin, W. B., 671n, 672.
Authors Luncheon, addressed by Sanford.
126-127.
Automobile Dealers Association, speeches,
to, listed, 493, 513.
Avery County Planning Board, 265.
Awards Commission, appointments to,
661.
Aycock, C. Brantley, 719.
Aycock, Charles B., 3, 3w, 7, 92-93, 119,
139, 202, 203, 223, 228, 293, 335, 358,
379, 432, 461, 476, 563; biography of,
126; on education, 293-294; portrait of,
facing 379; quoted, 8, 91-92, 127, 293,
431, 432; threatened resignation of,
335.
Aycock, Mrs. Charles B., 658.
Aycock, E. B., 720.
Aycock, Jesse, Sr., 661^1.
Aycock, William B., pictured, facing 172.
Aycock (Charles B.) Memorial Commis-
sion, appointments to, 661.
Aydlett, N. Elton, 674.
Ayers, Brandt, participates in press con-
ference, 639-644, passim.
Ayers, Mrs. Eunice, 696.
B
BASF Colors and Chemicals, Inc.,
speech at, listed, 498.
"B" Budget, 12, 16, 18, 68, 70, 72; re-
quests for, 31.
Babb, James G., Jr., 733.
Babcock, Mrs. Charles, 744.
Babcock, Charles H., 601, 601n.
Babcock, James A., 676.
Babcock, Willard Farrington, 38, SSn,
604; serves as Director of Highways,
680.
Babcock (Mary Reynolds) Foundation,
392.
Babson, Fred, 718.
Bagley, Dudley, 703>?.
Bagley, Smith, 712.
Bahnson, Agnew, Jr., 660, 661^.
Bahnson, Agnew, Sr., 689?2.
Bailey, James S., 728.
Bailey, Mrs. M. P., 691.
Bain, Carson, 692.
Baity, H. G., 730.
Baker, Alden, 746.
Baker, C. Alden, 711.
Baker, Mrs. Clara P., 684.
Baker, John H., Jr., 696.
Baker, Lenox D., 678.
Baker, Richard C, 728.
Baker, Walter, 719^.
Baker, William, 593.
Baldwin, T. F., 738.
Ballance, Cutlar Lee, 702.
Ballance, Paul S., 688.
Ballance, Mrs. Priscilla D., 727.
Ballance, Robert, 659.
Ballance, Robert O., 696.
Ballentine, L. Y., 35, 35n, 110, 205, 273,
65Sn, 740; commended by Sanford, 190;
death of, 626; serves as Commissioner
of Agriculture, 651, 651n; state
positions held by, 626.
Balthis, W. L., 721n.
Banker, Oscar G., 738.
Bankers, hold New York City luncheon
meeting, 191; Sixty-fifth Annual Con-
vention of, addressed by Sanford, 130.
Bankers Association, xxix; Farm Confer- .
ence of, speech at, listed, 491.
Banking Commission, appointments to,
662.
Baptist Colleges, Southern Association of,
addressed by Sanford, 252-253.
Bar Association, 50; urges court reforms,
77, 279, 281.
Bar Center, speeches at, listed, 493, 510.
Barbee, Allen, 700.
Barbee, G. V., Jr., 737.
Barbee, W. Millard, xxiii.
Barber, C. J., 749.
Barber, Wade, 695??,.
Barber Examiners, State Board of, ap-
pointments to, 725.
Barbers, convention of, addressed by San-
ford, 353-356.
Barbour, Charles D., 660.
Barden, Ralph B., 726.
Barefoot, R. A., 734.
Barker, Felix S., 745.
Barkley, Alben W., 189.
Barnes, J. J., 663, 667.
Barnes, James T., 698.
Barnes, Joseph E., 678.
Barnett, Frank, 169.
Barnett, John D., 671^.
Barnette, K. C, 696.
Barwick, Killian, 660.
Bass, William E., 708.
Bateman, J. C, 731.
Bateman, Thomas A., 676.
Bath, Historic Commission, appointments
to, 681-682.
Battle, Turner W., 657.
Battleship Commission, see U.S.S. "North
Carolina" Battleship Commission.
Batts, Jefferson Davis, 743.
754
Index
Batts, R. T., 736.
Beal, G. E., 686, 710.
Beale, Seth, 664, 724.
Beam, Grier, 747.
Beam, R. D., 727n.
Bean, Bernie, 711.
Bean, J. W., 43, 43n, 661; serves as Chair-
man, Industrial Commission, 685.
Bear, Sigmond, 698.
Beard, Mrs. Mae Adams, 728.
Beasley, Mrs. C. W., 748.
Beatty, Ozell K., 721.
Beaufort County, phosphate mines of, 484.
Bechtold, Al, 676, 677n.
Beddingfield, Ed, 717.
Beddingfield, Edgar T., 690, 739.
Beech, Mrs. Harvey, 720.
Beerman, William L., 749.
Belk, Henry, 661, 665, 677.
Belk, Irwin, 653, 655w, 682.
Belk, John M., 733.
Belk, Thomas M., 715.
Belk, Mrs. W. H., 666.
Bell, Albert R., 733.
Bell, Daniel G., 680, 681n.
Bell, G. Erick, Jr., 729n.
Bell, H. P., Jr., 716.
Bell, Ira E., 715.
Bell, J. 0., Jr., 699.
Bell, J. Spencer, 653n.
Bell, Mrs. J. Spencer, 740.
Bellamy, C. E., ISln.
Bellamy, Mrs. W. M., 666.
Belmont Abbey, speech at, listed, 494.
Belt, Philip, 676.
Benevolent Patriotic Orders of Does,
speech to, listed, 494.
Bennett, Elizabeth S., 719n.
Bennett, Hugh, 110, llOw.
Bennett, Yates Randolph, 680, 681n.
Bennette, George R., 714.
Benson, Clifton L., 680.
Benson, Eleanor, 750.
Benson, William D., 747.
Benson National Guard Armory, speech
at, 147-149.
Berini, Louis, 748.
Berkley, Scott B., 705n.
Berkshire Knitting Mills, speech at, listed,
495.
Bernhardt, Paul L., 704.
Berryhill, Walter R., 690.
Bertie County Tercentenary Celebration,
speech at, listed, 516.
Best, Andrew, 690, 711, 716.
Beta Club District Meeting, speech at,
listed, 512.
Betts, Mrs. Doris, 665.
Beveridge, David, 667.
Beveridge, James, serves as Film Board i
Chairman, 444, 444n, 742.
Bias, John C, 718.
Bible reading and prayer in public schools, ^
596-597.
Bickett, Thomas W., 4, 4n.
Bier, Justus, 49, 49n. j
Bishopric, Welsford, 721. •
Bissette, W. I., 657n. i
Bizzell, M. E., 735n.
Black, J. H., 703, 705w.
Black, J. W., 721n. J
Black, Martin L., Jr., 725n. I
Black, Paul A. L., 736.
Black Mountain Sanatorium, 45.
Blackburn, Charles F., 686.
Blackmer, Sidney, 447, 447n, 712.
Blades, Carlton *J., 704.
Blair, Mott Parks, 670.
Blair, Tully, 699n.
Blakley, Shem K., Sr., 663n.
Blankenship, Ernest M., 701.
Blankenship, Leslie C, 700. i
Blee, Margaret, 738.
Blind, aid to the, 21; students pictured jil
with Sanford, facing 610.
Blind, State Commission for the, appoint- s
ments to, 662; volunteer support of, 60.')
Blind and Deaf, State School for the, 59;
director appointments for, 714; speeches i
at, listed, 504, 513.
Blizzard, M. J., 736, lS7n. 1
Blount, Judson H., 732. |
Blount, William, 718.
Blue, H. Clifton, 13, 13n, 678, 722, .741; ;)
dinner honoring, 513.
Blue Ridge Parkway, 54, 82.
B'nai B'rith Convention, speech at, listed,!
500.
Bobbitt, Garland E., 727n.
Bobbitt, S. L., 726. ;j
Boiler Rules, Board of, appointments to,l3
662.
Boiling, Floyd J., 671n.
Boiling Spring Lake, commissioners ofj
listed, 734-735.
Bond, E. P., Jr., 726.
Bond, Mrs. Ed, 705. j
Bond, Mrs. Edward G., 682. i
Bond, John Whitted, 718. ^
Bond issues, 186, 194-201, 461-463, 638-11
639.
Bone, Allen, 740.
Bone, Walter J., 656.
Bonner, Herbert C, 280; tribute to, 423.
Bonner (Herbert C.) Bridge, dedicatory
address for, 423.
Boone, Jack, 749.
Borden, Martha Gold, 661n.
Index
765
Boren, Orton A., 669n.
Boren, W. C. Ill, 677.
Borthwick, Harry R., 725n.
Bosses' Night Banquet, addressed by San-
ford, 402.
Bottlers Association, Inc., speech to, listed,
509.
Boulware, C. E., 660.
Bounds, Vernon Leland, 319, 319n.
Bowe, Geneva Jones, 743.
Bowers, Claude T., 61, 61n, 148, 652, 7097i.
Bowers, Henry, 740.
t Bowles, Hargrove, Jr., 39, 39n, 575, 671n,
I 745; addresses Western Industrial De-
velopment Conference, 136; serves as
Chairman, Board of Conservation and
Development, 670.
I Boyce, A. C, 682.
I Boyd, Mrs. James, 712.
I Boyd, Mrs. John D., 717.
I Boyle, Sir Edward, introduction of, 274-
275.
Boys State, speech at, listed, 514.
Bradham, Douglass M., 735, 735r?..
I Bradley, Omar, 384.
Bradshaw, Charles, 686.
Bradshaw, Herbert C, 662.
Brady, J. P., 702.
Brady, Leslie, 675.
Brame, Cyrus Watson, 680, 713r?.
Brame, W. A., 69Bn.
Brand, J. Neveland, Jr., 725.
Brandeis University, speech at, listed, 516.
Brandon, John T., 675.
Braswell, Roland C, 744.
Brauer, John C, 661%.
Braxton, H. Gait, e69n.
Bray, Harry E., 685, 685n.
Breatholizer test, proposed, 79, 585-586.
Breece, Rodney R., 663.
Breeland, Wade H., 726.
Brenizer, Addison G., Jr., 690.
Brett, A. H., llln.
Brevard Music Center, 444.
i Brewer, J. Street, 688.
it Brewer, Kidd, 713n; statement regarding,
1 560-563.
I Brewer, William E., 719.
Brice, Edward, 612.
I Brickie, George, ISln.
i Bridger, Dewey H., 691n.
I Bridger, J. A., 710.
j Bridges, H. Paul, 722.
j Bridges, Henry Lee, 65, 65n, 651 ; pictured,
j facing 65.
' Briggs, Thurman, 710.
Britt, David M., 672, 700.
I Britt, Holly M., 696, G97n.
Broadcasters, Association of, addressed by
Sanford, 137-142, 344-351.
Broadfoot, Winston, 667n.
Broadrick, George, 634.
Brock, B. C, 713n.
Brock, Walter E., 655. r
Brogden, Leon, 749.
Brooks, Ben B., 715.
Broom, Alston B., 662.
Brotherhood Week, 221, 544.
Brothers, J. Grayson, 728.
Broughton, J. Melville, 4, 4n.
Broughton, Mrs. J. Melville, 697n.
Broughton, J, Melville, Jr., 681n, pictured,
facing 626.
Broughton, Thomas H., 746.
Broughton, W. E., 734.
Broughton High School, students from,
hear Sanford, 479.
Brower, Edwin N., 688, 739.
Brower, Edwin N., Sr., 697w. • -
Brown, Aycock, 664.
Brown, Charles W., 670, 671n.
Brown, Clark S., 724, 743.
Brown, Edwin P., 662.
Brown, Frank H., Jr., 693.
Brown, H. V., 716.
Brown, Harry E., 54, 54n, 711r?.
Brown, Lawson, 673.
Brown, Malcolm, 744.
Brown, Robert, 743.
Brown, Robert W., 730.
Brown, Rose Butler, 744.
Brown, Roy Eugene, 697, 739.
Brown, T. E., 657n.
Brown Creek Soil and Water Conservation
District, 194.
Brown decision (U. S. Supreme Court),
133.
Browning, Howard Marion, 662.
Bruton, Mrs. Charles, 714.
Bruton, Thomas Wade, 686, 687n; pic-
tured, facing 65; serves as Attorney
General, 651.
Bryan, Joseph M., 675n, 747.
Bryan, Raymond A., 726.
Bryan, Robert Emmet, 669.
Bryan, Mrs. W. Carroll, 684.
Bryant, Victor S., Sr., 683, 708.
Bryant, Mrs. Vida K., 699.
Buchanan, John O., 680.
Buchanan, L. M., 685.
Buck, W. M., 692.
Budget, N.C., surpluses in, xxxvi; see also
"A" Budget, Advisory Budget Commis-
sion, "B" Budget, Capital Improvement
Budget, Contingency and Emergency
756
Index
Fund, Executive Budget Acts, General
Fund.
Budget Bureau, 31, 81.
Budget Division, 67; economy moves of,
203-204.
Budget messages, 11-25; 67-74.
Budget report, 21, 68.
Buffaloe, James T., 702, lOSri.
Building Code Council, appointments to,
662-663.
Bullard, Gladys, 670.
Bullard, Lester, 720.
Bullock, James F., 658.
Bumbarger, Paul W., Jr., 689.
Bundy, William J., 697n.
Bunn, Thomas D., 634, 665, 665n, 680, 681.
Bunnelle, Robert, 748.
Burch, Robert A., case of, 560-563.
Bureau of Public Roads, investigates
highway relocation, 603-605.
Burgess, Andrew S., 738.
Burgess, Bessie Perry, 72992.
Burgess, Charles A., 676.
Burgwyn, W. H. S., 668.
Burgwyn, W. H. S., Jr., 696.
Burial Association Commissioner, appoint-
ment to, 663.
Burke County Community College, trus-
tee appointments for, 714.
Burlington-Alamance Industrial Education
Center, speech at, listed, 500.
Burlington Mills, 124.
Burnett, Richard L., 714.
Burns, F. Kent, 707ti.
Burnside, J. E., 716.
Burrow, Sam J., Jr., 702, 744.
Burton, S. Marvin, 676.
Bush, J. Gordon, 672, 696, 697n.
Business, relationship of, with government,
375-377.
Business and Professional Women, head-
quarters of, dedicated, 175-176.
Business Development Corporation, as-
sists with food processing program, 474.
Busse, Ewald W., 739.
But What About the People?, xxii.
Butler, G. L., 718.
Butler, John S., 732.
Butner, Fred W., Jr., 725.
Butterfield, G. K., 743.
Bynum, Fred W., Jr., 679n.
Byrd, Joe K., 653, 691, 745.
Byrd, N. H., 696.
Byrum, Albert, 682, 718.
C
C. p. & L. Plant, speech at, listed, 506.
Calder, Robert, 700, 748.
Caldwell, Harry B., 110, llOn, 160.
Caldwell, Mrs. Harry B., 113.
Caldwell, Jesse, 716.
Caldwell Technical Institute, trustee ap-
pointments for, 714.
Camak, Pascal M., 703, 746.
Cameron, Bruce B., 704. i
Cameron, C. Clifford, 747.
Cameron, Daniel David, 670.
Cameron, Tom U., 710.
Camp Lejeune, 177.
Campaign, gulDernatorial, appeal for re- p
sponsible behavior in, 621-622; endorse- |
ment of Preyer, 450-454 ; governor's role •
in, 610-611. :
Campaign, presidential, xxv, 626-628. '
Campbell, Charles W., 721.
Campbell, Hartwell, 741.
Campbell, Ila Green, 669. ]
Campbell, Orville, 708.
Campbell College, speeches at, listed, 491,
504.
Canada, National Film Board of, 444. j
Cancer, 411-416; Commission to Study the I
Cause and Control of, appointments to, i
664; see also Tobacco.
Cannon, Charles A., xxiii, 672, 689, 747. i
Cannon, Mrs. Charles A., 681.
Cannon, Hugh, 549, 549n, 567, 712; reads i|
address, 410 ; serves as Assistant to the i
Governor, 652 ; serves as Chairman of t
Standardization Committee, 704; serves i
as Director of the Department of i
Administration, 652n.
Cannon Mills, xxiii, 124, 268.
Cantrell and Cochrane, Ltd., speech at, t
listed, 505. 1
Cantwell, R. W., 695%.
Cape Fear Basin, development of, 54, 580- 1
582. 1
Cape Fear River, Board of Commissioners
of Navigation for the, appointments to^ t
694.
Cape Fear Technical Institute, trustee ap- 3
pointments for, 714.
Cape Hatteras Seashore Commission, ap- ■
pointments to, 664.
Capital Improvement Budget, definition of,
68; funds for new projects in, 70.
Capstick, Donald, 699n.
Carey, James M., 670, 671n.
Carlton, John C, 697.
Carlyle, Irving E., 64, 64n, 210, 295, 697n, /
718, 741; serves as Chairman, Com- 1
mission on Education Beyond the High 5
School, xxviii, 559.
Carmichael, Oliver C, 675n.
Carmichael Gymnasium, speech at, listed,?
511.
Index
Carnegie Awards Banquet, addressed by
Sanford, 458.
Carnegie Foundation, 358, 612; grants of,
41, 388, 446.
Carnes, Richard L., 733.
Carolina, early settlers of, 574.
Carolina Charter, 365; tercentenary of,
56, 444, 574, picture of celebration of,
facing 574.
Carolina Charter Tercentenary Commis-
sion, 444; appointments to, 665-666.
Carolina Textiles, Inc., dedication of plant
at, 459-460.
Carolinas- Virginia Purchasing Agents As-
sociation, speech to, listed, 511.
Carpenter, C. Ray, 612.
Carr, G. Paul, 700. .
Carr, Robert M., 710.
Carraway, Gertrude, 661.
Carrington, George, 689.
Carrington, Mrs. George L., 690.
Carroll, Charles F., 40, 40n, 462, 548, 611,
674, 740, 744, 748; pictures of, facing
65, 486, 611; quoted, 389; serves as
Superintendent of Public Instruction,
651.
Carroll, Hardy III, 655n.
Carroll, J. R., 733.
Carroll, Ottie J., 671.
Carroll, Wallace, 712.
Carson, Nat, picture of, facing 575.
Carter, C. Douglas, 745.
Carter, Clyde, 679n.
Carter, Harry, 12Sn.
Carter, Oliver, 694.
Carter, Wade V., 730.
Cartoon, "Stones for the House that Terry
Built," facing 487.
Cartwright, William H., 748.
Cass, Cooper D., 694.
Castleman, S. T., 747.
Caswell Memorial Commission, appoint-
ments to, listed, 666.
Catawba Valley Technical Institute, trus-
tee appointments for, 714-715.
Gates, C. Coleman, 676.
Catholic Church, opposes federal aid to
public schools, 439; schools of, 367-368.
Caustic Soda Terminal, speech at, listed,
504.
Cavendish, M. E., 687w.
Cemetery Association, speech to, listed,
498.
, Centenary Methodist Church, speech at,
I listed, 516.
Center for Mental Retardation, funds re-
i quested for, xxx.
Central Piedmont Community College,
trustee appointments for, 715,
757
Central Prison, high school and technical
school at, 485; mental health clinic at,
317.
Cerebral Palsy, Hospital for, trustee ap-
pointments for, 715.
Certified Public Accountant Examiners,
Board of, appointments to, 725.
Certified Public Accountants, Association
of, speech to, listed, 492.
Chalk, W. B., 732.
Chamberlin, Harrie R., 692, 745.
Chambers, J. Le Vonne, ISSn.
Chambers, Martha Jo, 700.
Chambers, W. Dillon, 726.
Chambers of Commerce, addressed by
Sanford, 107-108, 215-216, 220-221, 265,
329; speeches to, listed, 491-494, 498,
507, 520.
Chamblee, Royster, 689. 1
Champion, E. L., 737.
Chanlett, Emil T., 660, 730. '
Chaote, A. Vance, 672.
Chapin, F. Stuart, 741.
Chapman, Ray, 714.
Charles, Mrs. Marjorie S., 681.
Charlotte and Mecklenburg County Offi-
cials Dinner, speech at, listed, 517.
Charlotte College, 298; speech at, listed,
496; trustee appointments for, 715-716.
Charlotte-Mecklenburg School Convoca-
tion, speech at, 172-173.
Chase, Harry Woodburn, 174, 434.
Chase, Mrs. J. B., 697.
Chase, Nancy W., 723.
Chatham, Hugh, 677, 677ri.
Chatham, Hugh G. II, 710.
Chemstrand Research Center, speech at,
listed, 491.
Cherry, George, 702, 703n, 746.
Cherry, George B., 652, 706.
Cherry, Robert Gregg, 4, An, 335.
Cherry, S. Thad, 676.
Cherry Hospital, Advisory Council for,
appointments to, 716; dedication of
building at, 276.
Chestnut, Al, 667.
Childers, Max L., 655n, 656.
Children, disadvantaged, 390-392.
Chiropractic Examiners, Board of, ap-
pointments to, 725-726.
Chowan College, addressed by Sanford,
463-464.
Christian, Louis G., 691.
Christian College, Missouri, speech at,
listed, 519.
Christian Education and Christian Youth
Council, speech to, listed, 505.
Christians and Jews, National Conference
of, 544.
758
Index
I
Christmas statement, 560.
Church, John T., 686.
Church, separation of, from state, 135.
Cities, 397-398; state aid to, 51.
Citizens Association, speech to, listed, 492.
Citizens Committee for Better Schools,
addressed by Sanford, 222; speech to,
listed, 513.
Civil Air Patrol, appointments to, 666.
Civil Defense, 285-291, 384; agency for,
60-61; appropriations for, 21; Director
of, 535, 666; see also "Conelrad."
Civil Defense Association, speech at, list-
ed, 519.
Civil rights, 369, 609, 623; law concern,
ing, 624-625; report of committee on,
639.
Civil Service, U.S., 559.
Civil War, 202-203, 293, 335, 366, 404, 437;
commemoration of, 543.
Clark, Arthur W., 700.
Clark, Badie T., 528.
Clark, Ben H., 45, 45n.
Clark, Chatham C, 653.
Clark, David, 706.
Clark, Edward B., 653n, 654, 655n.
Clark, Henry T., Jr., 660, 690.
Clark, James H., 716.
Clark, John G., 721^1.
Clark, Miles, 664.
Clark, Mrs. Nina DeBruhl, 706.
Clark, Paul, 734.
Clark, Richard S., 678.
Clark, S. N., 666, 682.
Clark, Mrs. Samuel N., 681.
Clark, William G., Jr., 694.
Clarke, Jarnes McClure, 684, 712.
Classroom Teachers Association, address-
ed by Sanford, 166.
Clasz, Mrs. Lucille, 677.
Claud, Joseph G., 747.
Claytor, David Dortch, 728.
Cleary, Mrs. Frances, 698.
Clemence, J. B., 688.
Clement, Travis, 687.
Cleveland, Gordon, 661.
Coast line, danger of losing, 307.
Coastal Historyland, 82, 398, 611.
Coates, Fred B., 732.
Cobb, Collier, Jr., 695n.
Cobb, Mrs. Susan Bash, 744.
Cobb, William Archie, 727.
Coble, Walter A., 688, 689w.
Cochrane, William M., 702, 746.
Cockman, A. L., 721.
Coffey, Harold, 672, 741.
Coffey, Paul Armfield, 562.
Coggins, Jyles J., 691. •
Cohen, Mrs. Larry, 659.
Cohoon, William Charles, 58, 58w, 641,;
655n, 705n; serves as Director of Pro-i
bation Commission, 696.
Cole, E. Wilson, 683.
Coleman, Horace Clenon, 721, 721n.
Colleges, senior, xxix, 210, 470, 475; state-
supported system of, 406 ; see also names
of individual colleges. ;
Collins, T. R., 749. ]
Collins, W. R., 718.
Colored Orphanage of North Carolina,ti
directors for, 716. "
Coltrane, David S., 67, 67n, 567, 600, 653w, |
657%, 686, 705w; picture of, facing 600;
serves as Chairman of Advisory Budget j
Commission, 656; serves as Chairman of '
Good Neighbor Council, xxxv, 579, |
743; serves as Director of Administra-
tion, 562. I
Coltrane, Mrs. David S., 668.
Columbus County Community College, !
trustee appointments for, 716. !
Combs, Bert, 189, 509. !
Commerce, U.S. Department of, 547; re-'
port of, 131. i
Commercial fisheries, appropriations for, !
22. I
Commercial Fisheries Advisory Board, ap-n!
pointments to, 667. i
Commercial Fisheries Study Commission, J
appointments to, 667-668. |
Commission on Goals for Higher Educa-i
tion in the South, 274; report of, 250,1
279. j
Commission on the Study of the Manner !
of Selection of Members of the Several !
Boards of Education . . . , appointments t|
to, 673.
Commission to Study the Public Education?
of Exceptionally Talented Children, 339.f
Commissions, other, see titles alphabetized
under primary word of subject.
Committee on Postmortem Medicolegalt
Examinations, appointments to, 730.
Committees, other, see titles alphabetized
under primary word of subject.
Commodity Credit Corporation (U.S.),
160.
Community Arts Council, addressed by
Sanford, 440-449.
Community College, Charlotte, speech at,:
listed, 496. j
Community College Act, 557.
Community College Advisory Council, 297.
Community colleges, 393, 406, 471, 478,
633; plans for, xxviii-xxix, 208, 296-297;
see also names of individual colleges.
Community Development Programs Con-
ference, speech to, listed, 518.
I
Index
759
Community planning", problems of, 52.
Community projects, supported by federal
grants, 617-618.
Conant, James Bryant, 96, 382; quoted,
xxi, 151, 183.
Concert Music Association dinner, speech
at, listed, 492.
Cone, Benjamin, 720.
Cone, Bonnie E., 741, 748.
Cone (Moses H.) Memorial Hospital,
trustee appointments for, 716.
"Conelrad," 138, 289, see also Civil De-
fense.
Confederate Centennial Commission, ap-
pointments to, 668.
Confederate Centennial Day, addressed by
Sanford, 119.
Confederate Woman's Home, directors for,
717.
Conference for Social Service, addressed
by Sanford, 235-238.
Conference on Mental Retardation, ad-
dressed by Sanford, 356-364.
Congress, U.S., 158, 559, 565; educational
programs enacted by, 438.
Congress of Colored Parents and Teach-
ers, speech to, listed, 511.
Conley, Allen R., Jr., 671n.
Connelly, James A., 711n.
Connor, R. D. W., 119, 365.
Conservation, 194, 214, 307.
Conservation and Development, Board of,
575 ; appointments to, 669-671 ; meetings
of, addressed by Sanford, 373, reorgan-
ization of, 142; speeches to, listed, 493,
502, 511, 513, 517, 518, 519.
Conservation and Development, Depart-
ment of, 593, 614; Commerce and Indus-
try Division of, 273, 373, 457, 483; Com-
mercial Fisheries Division of, 37;
Community Planning Division of, 52,
484; Director of, 449, 670; Industrial
Development Conferences sponsored by,
122; jobs provided by, 401; Parks Divi-
sion of, 535, 670-671; progress reported
by, xxxi, 261 ; promotion of industry by,
36, 39, 164, 325, 459, 473; promotion of
tourism by, 632.
Conservation districts, addressed by San-
ford, 194, 266.
Constitution, N.C., redistricting require-
ment of, 43, 87.
Constitution, U.S., 475, 544.
Contingency and Emergency Fund, 17.
Conway, Martha Bell, 684.
Cook, Dennis S., 672.
Cook, Harry D., 701.
Cooke, Thomas C, 663n.
Cooley, Harold, 110, llOn, 160; pictured,
facing 626.
Cooper, A. B., 734.
Cooper, Gordon, 81.
Cooper, J. C, Sr., 686.
Cooper, Morgan, 723.
Co-ops, Electric and Telephone, 112.
Copeland, James William, ISn, 705n;
serves as judge, 654; works on budget,
13.
Corbett, William Horace, 724.
Corbett, William M., Jr., 736, 737n.
Corbin, William L., 705.
Cornell, J. Harry, 658.
Corning Glass Plant, speech at, listed, 509.
Cornwall, Tom, 697n.
Cornwell, James I., 732.
Cornwell, Samuel O., 691.
Correction and Training, Board of, 359;
activities and programs of, 63, 237; ap-
pointments to, 671-672.
Correctional institutions, 210, 237-238.
Cortes, Emil, 691.
Cosmetic Art Examiners, Board of, ap-
pointments to, 726.
Costabile, John D., 729n.
Costin, Joe L., 730.
Gotten, Lyman A., 684.
Gotten, Mrs. Lyman A., 683.
Cotton Growers Cooperative Association,
187; speech to, listed, 495.
Council, Carl C, 723n.
Council, John M., Jr., 663.
Council of State, 559; members of, listed,
651; pictured, facing 65; salary in-
creases for, 72.
Counties, increased support of schools by,
440.
Counties, National Association of, speech
to, listed, 519.
County Accountants, Association of,
speech to, listed, 519.
County Commissioners, Association of,
462; addressed by Sanford, 251, 439-
440; speeches to, listed, 492, 515.
County Commissioners, National Conven-
tion of, speech to, listed, 495.
County Officials, National Association of,
254-260.
County Planning Board, of Avery County,
265.
Court system, diagnostic services needed
by, 318; lower courts of, 282-283; re-
forms of, xxxvi, 50, 77, 246, 266, 278,
279, 285.
Covenant United Presbjrterian Church,
speech at, listed, 517.
Cover, Mrs. G. W., 668.
760
Index
Covington, Jack, 662.
Cowan, A. R., Jr., 721.
Cowan, Gerald, QlSn.
Cowan, J. C, 749.
Cowan, J. C, Jr., 661n, 722.
Cowan, J. Gerald, 713, 745.
Cowans Ford Station and Lake Norman,
speech at, listed, 519.
Cox, Frederick L., 702, 746.
Cox, Joe M., 6897*.
Coyle, M. G., 735?i.
Cragan, Paul S., 722.
Craig, James S., Jr., 708.
Craig, Locke, 3, Sn.
Crandall, Mae, 698.
Crandell, Clifton E., 660.
Crane, Frank, 42, 42n, 739; on minimum
wage, 594; pictured, facing 65; serves
as Commissioner of Labor, 651.
Craven, Charles H., Jr., 708.
Craven, J, Braxton, 655n.
Crawford, C. R., 705n.
Crawford, Robert G. H., 658.
Crawford, W. G., 732, 733.
Crawford, W. R., 724.
Creadick, Robert N., 727.
Credit rating, of N.C., 65, 133, 280, 326,
375, 462.
Credit Union Building, speech at, listed,
504.
Credit Union League, addressed by San-
ford, 232.
Creech, Joseph, 701.
Crew, W. Lunsford, 674, 685, 709.
Crime, discussion of, 312-319.
Crisp, Mrs. William T., 748.
Cromartie, J. Henry, 730, ISln.
Cromartie, Luther M., 714.
Cromer, A. H., 735n.
Crouse, R. Floyd, 710, llln, 740.
Crow, Richard, pictured, facing 449.
Crowe, Lloyd O., 725.
Culbreth, Mrs. Lou E., 676.
Cullipher, Wesley E., 708.
Cullom, F. Shelby, serves as Commission-
er of Banks, 662.
"Culture Week," 445.
Cunningham, H. H., 668.
Current, Ruth, 699.
Currie, Angus J., 721.
Currie, Claude, lOln, 740.
Currie, E. MacArthur, 748.
Currie, James S., 701n.
Currie, Lauchlin M., 660, 661??.
Currie, Wilbur H., 660, 661n.
Currin, M. S., 716.
Currituck County, proclaimed disaster
area, 525.
Cuthbert, Grange S. Ill, 735, 735n.
D
Dailey, Ruben J., 696.
Dairy industry, 241-242.
Dairy Month Kick-off Breakfast, addressedli
by Sanford, 241-242.
Dalton, Harry, 659.
Dalton, Harry L., 718, 719n.
Dameron, E. P., 714.
Dameron, Mrs. Virginia, 713, 743.
Damtoft, W. J., 669n.
Daniel, E. C, 688.
Daniels, A. W., 667n. j.:
Daniels, Jonathan, 682.
Daniels, Josephus, 414, 414n; contribu-a
tions of, 169.
Daniels, Moncie L., Jr., 667.
Daniels Family Reunion, addressed by*
Sanford, 168-169.
Dare County, proclaimed disaster afea,i
525.
Davenport, Willis H., 720.
Davidson, Chalmers G., 665.
Davidson, Wilbur C, 661n, 690.
Davidson College, 298, 459.
Davidson County Court, appointments to,i
738.
Davidson County NCEA, addressed by|
Sanford, 417-418.
Davie, William Richardson, 228, 228r?.
Davis, Archie R., 724.
Davis, Bruce E., 677^.
Davis, Chester S., 710, 711n.
Davis, Courtland H., 692, 744.
Davis, Egbert L., Jr., 658.
Davis, Mrs. Fred, 703n.
Davis, Gary C, 676.
Davis, L P., 697.
Davis, James W., 695.
Davis, Lambert, 665.
Davis, Mrs. Lura K., 728.
Davis, M. B., 695, 697n.
Davis, Murray, llln. 4
Davis, Paul Dexter, 709.
Davis, Rachel D. Ill, 176, 185, 185n, 664,
748.
Davis, Withers, 706.
Dawsey, B. W., 678.
Dawson, A. C, pictured, facing 486.
Dawson, Braxton Bragg, 703, 746.
Dawson, Council Claudius, 723.
Dawson, John G., 666.
Dawson, Victor, 718.
Day, Harold Vann, 728.
Day, N. E., 703.
Dayvault, Frank Wilson, 728.
Deaf, schools for the, 59, 350; directors
for, listed, 717; Morganton, school there,
Index
761
addressed by Sanford, 242; see also
Blind and Deaf, State School for the.
Dean, Charles B., 605, 605n.
Deaton, W. Ralph, 689.
Debutante Ball, speech at, listed, 495.
Dees, John, 628.
Dees, John T., 670.
Dees, William A., Jr., 674.
Defense, discussed, 147-149, 170-172.
DeGroat, Eric B., 698.
De Mille, Agnes, 447, 447n, 712.
Democratic Club, Charlotte, speech to,
listed, 491.
Democratic Convention, National, attended
by Sanford, xxv.
Democratic Convention, State, addressed
by Sanford, 240, 431-433.
Democratic dinner, addressed by Sanford,
188-189.
Democratic Nominees for General Assem-
bly, speech to, listed, 506.
Democratic party, accomplishments of,
214, 280; public concerns of, 432; see
also Young Democratic Clubs.
Democratic primary, that of Sanford,
xxiv-xxv.
Democratic rallies, addressed by Sanford,
280, 281-285; speeches at, listed, 500,
502, 503, 509, 510, 520.
Democratic ticket, comment on, 629.
Democratic Unity Dinner, addressed by
Sanford, 455-456.
Democratic Women, addressed by Sanford,
184-186; speeches to, listed, 493, 509,
515, 519.
deMolay, Order of, speech to, listed, 494.
Dennis, Catherine, 739.
Denny, Emery B., 654, 655n.
Dental Examiners, Board of, appointments
to, 726.
Department of Commerce, U.S., 547; re-
port of, 131.
Departments, of North Carolina govern-
ment, see titles alphabetized under pri-
mary word of subject.
Derrickson, W. L., 734.
DeVane, James M., 728.
DeVane, W. P., 718.
Dewitt, Lindsey G., 721.
Deyton, Robert G., 685.
Dickens, Wallace J., 693.
Dickenson, John B., Jr., 725n.
Dickerson, John R., 708.
Dickerson, N. K., Jr., 726, 733.
Dickerson, Paul, 722.
Dillard, N. L., 724.
Dillard, William, 713.
: Dillon, Grover L., Jr., 662.
Disaster areas, 525.
Distinguished Service Award and Bosses*
Night Banquet, addressed by Sanford,
402.
"Dixie Dynamo," 240, 326, 563.
Dixon, Dorothy, 727, 729??.
Dixon, McDonald, 718.
Dixon, Richard D., Jr., 682.
Doak, Mrs. Charles G., 661.
Doby, Henry C, 717n.
Doby, Henry C, Jr., 730.
Dodd, David, Jr., 731.
Dodd, Edward B., 701.
Dodge (F. W.) Company, 569.
Dodson, Taylor, 699.
Dolley, Stephen B., Jr., 672.
Donnelly, James F., 691.
Dortch, Hugh, 668.
Dougherty, B. B., 241.
Doughton, J. Kemp, 13, 13n, 657n, 672.
Douglas, S. Preston, 688.
Douglas Aircraft Company, 475.
Dowd, Herbert, 749.
Dowdy, Lewis, 742.
Dowdy, William F., Jr., 675.
Downing, Erie, 726.
Draft, see Selective Service.
Drama, in N.C., 324, 442-443.
Drane, Mrs. F. B., 682.
Dreyfus Laboratory, speech at, listed, 497.
Drinkwater, Alpheus W., 710.
Driver Education Conference, speech to,
listed, 517.
Driver training requirements, 607.
DuBose, Mrs. D. St. Pierre, 683.
Duke, James Buchanan, 321, 321r?, 458-
459.
Duke, Washington, 321, 321n.
Duke Endowment Dinner, addressed by
Sanford, 458-459.
Duke Family, tobacco factories of, 268.
Duke University, 459, 487; speeches at,
listed, 498, 504, 511, 521.
Duncan, C. Cecil, 679.
Duncan, Edwin, 66Sn.
Duncan, Edwin, Jr., 713.
Duncan, Harmon, 742.
Duncan, Lucy R., 736.
Duncan, Samuel, 745.
Duncan, Samuel E., 696.
Dunham, Wally P., 688.
Dunn, Syd, 749.
Durden, Robert F., 658.
Durham, Mrs. Ann B., 665.
Durham, Carl T., 528.
Durham County Civil Court, judge of,
listed, 738.
Dysart, L. A., 713%.
I
1
i
762
Index
E
Eagles, Fred M., 693n.
Eagles, Joseph Colin, Jr., 13, 13n, 657n.
Earnhardt, Mrs. Carrie M., 682.
East Carolina College, 125; accomplish-
ments of, 378; addressed by Sanford,
128, 378; speeches at, listed, 494, 500,
519; trustee appointments for, 718.
Easterling, Mrs. Ruth M., 748.
Easterling, Mrs. Thomas, 675n.
Eastern Star, speech to, listed, 494.
Eastwood, Lemuel P., 686.
Eaton Manufacturing Company, speech
at, listed, 519.
Economic Development, Conference on,
addressed by Sanford, 190.
Economic Development Committee, speech
at, listed, 497.
Economic legislation, statement regarding,
545-546.
Economic Opportunity Act, 420, 427, 472,
618.
Economy, in government, 402, 559-560.
Edens, Mollis, 745.
Edens, W. H., 702.
Edenton, Historic Commission, appoint-
ments to, 682-683.
Edgecombe County, 427.
Edinger, Lois, 740; pictured, facing 486.
Educare, addressed by Sanford, 418.
Education, 121, 133, 172-173, 222, 342, 380-
396; ABC, program of, xxxii, 487;
appropriations for, 17, 476-477; Aycock's
contributions to, 293-294; bond issues
for, 120, 460-463; Christian, 135; cur-
riculum study of, 95, 96, 179; dropout
problem of, 280-281, 341, 378, 386; ex-
penditures for, 99; extracurricular ac-
tivities of, 144; federal aid to, 434-439;
for adults, 393; history of, 207, 381-382;
importance of, 170, 177, 220-221, 232-
233, 338, 418, 486-487; in New England,
366; in the South, 150-158, 220-221, 304-
306, 469; needs and improvements in,
31, 40-41, 70-71, 113-114, 157, 201, 204-
205, 209, 263-264, 304-306, 369-372, 383,
394-395, 576-578, 596, 645-647; physical,
144; private institutions of, 295-296;
progress in, 319-320, 346-348, 358, 476-
479 ; responsibility for, 179-182 ; revenue
for, 28, 29; special education program
of, 389; statistics on, 115-116, 208; stay-
in-scTiool program of, 206, 602-603; sup-
ported by N.C. Fund, 601-602; voca-
tional, 158, 331, 347, 355, 613; see also
General Assembly "Operation Second
Chance," Quality Education.
Education, State Board of, 76, 192, 229-
230, 323, 618; appointments to, 335, 673 ;r
appropriations for, 18, 178, 591; budget
of, 31, 41, 84; community college pro-
gram of, 64, 65, 71, 297; Curriculum;
Study and Research Department of,!
xxvii, 576; directs Governor's School,-:
388; funds allocated to, xxxii; its role ini
quality education program, 94-102,;
passim; research and study of, 99, 487;
support of LINC by, 468.
Education, United Forces for, 462. j
Education Beyond the High School, Com-i
mission on, xxvii, 64, 179, 263, 274, 338,ii
556-559; appointments to, 741-742;?;
Chairman of, 295; recommendations of, I
71, 210; report of, discussed, 295-301,:!
passim.
Education rallies, addressed by Sanford,!
114-120; speeches at, listed, 491-521,1
passim. j
Educational meetings, addressed by San-
ford, 150-158, 172-173, 192-194, 250-251, i
278-279, 280, 301, 319-320, 328, 343-344,!
352, 366, 367-372, 378-379, 454-455, 460- !
463, 468-470, 472; speeches at, listed,
495, 498. j
Educational television, 41. j
Educational Television, Commission on,ij
appointments to, 740-741; established,;!
533-534. ;
Edwards, Mrs. Albert G., 709. j
Edwards, Daniel K., 658. |
Edwards, Daniel Kramer, 656. ,|
Edwards, Earle, 749.
Edwards, Elton, 672.
Edwards, Gerald, 660.
Edwards, John, 736, 737n.
Edwards, Zeno L., Sr., 679t?.
Efird, Crayon C, 677i?. )
Efird, Hoyle T., 654.
Efird, J. Frank, 675.
Ehle, John, 612, 742, 745; pictured, facingi
611.
Ehringhaus, John C. B., 4, 4n.
Elder, Alfonso, 67571, 741.
Elder, W. Cliff, 668.
Election, citizens urged to vote in, 622-
623; statement on, 635.
Elections, State Board of, 642, 650; ap-
pointments to, 674.
Electric Membership Association, ad-
dressed by Sanford, 403; speech to,'
listed, 501. ^ i
Electrical Contractors, Board of, appoint- j
ments to, 726.
Electrical Contractors, speech to, listed,
493.
Elfmon, Samuel L., 690.
Elias, Don S., 663n.
Index
763
Elizabeth City State Teachers College,
125; speeches to, listed, 505, 514; trus-
tee appointments for, 718.
Elliot, Mrs. E. N., 682.
Elliott, Arthur Graham, 680.
Elliott, Jerry, 640, 642, 646.
Elliott, William Perry, Sr., 670.
Ellis, Phil, 642-643, 710.
Ellis, Thomas C, 658.
Ellis, Thomas W., Jr., 703, 746.
Elmore, Bruce, 713.
Elon College, speech at, listed, 500.
Elwood, Earl L., 735.
Employees, governmental, 432, see also
State personnel.
Employment, 374, 480-483; statistics on,
575; wages for, 42.
Employment, Committee on Equal Em-
ployment Opportunity (U.S.), 334.
Employment Security Commission, 618;
appointments to, 677-678; assists Job
Corps program, 573 ; is commended, 554 ;
promotes tourist industry, 633; role of,
41-42; studies manpower needs, 263;
works with migrant labor, 44, 643.
Employment Security Commission Person-
nel, International Association of, speech
to, listed, 503.
Engineers, U.S. Army Corps of, recom-
mendations of, for Cape Fear River
Basin, 580-582.
Engineers and Land Surveyors, Board of
Registration for, appointments to, 726-
727.
England, Ronald, 700.
English Teachers, National Council of,
addressed by Sanford, 472.
Engstrom, Mrs. Alfred G., 683.
Enloe, Scroop W., Jr., 669w.
Environmental Health Center, 567-570,
611.
Epps, Frank, 720.
Ervin, Charles C, 670.
Ervin, Sam J., 477, 477n.
Ervin, Virginia, 736.
Esser, George, 745.
Essex, Harold, 740.
Eure, Thad, 39, 39n; pictured, facing 65;
serves as Secretary of State, 651.
Evans, B. Warner, 682.
Evans, E. H., 697n.
Evans, E. Hervey, 740.
Evans, E. Hervey, Jr., 669.
Evans, Edward Robert, 669.
Evans, Merrill, 38, 38n, 124; serves as
Chairman of Highway Commission, 680.
Evans, R. O., 674.
Evans, W. K., Jr., 736.
Everett, R. 0., 709.
Everett, Mrs. R. O., 668.
Everett, Robinson, pictured, facing 611.
Evins, Thomas M., 695n.
Ewing, Oscar R., 700, 748. '
Ewing, Robert S., 674, 675n.
Exceptional Children, speeches at confer-
ences on, listed, 498, 514.
Executive Budget Acts, 567 ; provisions of,
11, 13, 14, 67, 402.
Executive clemency, statement on, 552-
553.
F
Faircloth, Duncan McLauchlin, 680.
Faison, McRae, 699n.
Faith 7 capsule, pictured, facing 610.
Family Life Council Luncheon, speech at,
listed, 520.
Farm Advisory Committee (U.S.), 160.
Farm Bureau, N.C., 165; speech to, listed,
511.
Farm Bureau Federation, addressed by
Sanford, 194-202.
Farm Conference, of Bankers Association,
speech to, listed, 491.
Farm Credit District Meeting, speech to,
listed, 503.
Farm-Industry Day, addressed by San-
ford, 430-431.
Farm Organizations and Agricultural
Agencies, Board of, purpose of, 163.
Farm Policy Review Conference, speeches
at, listed, 498, 516.
Farmers, investments of, 457-458.
Farmers Cooperative Council, addressed
by Sanford, 108-113.
Farmers Cooperative Exchange, 108, 187.
Farmers Cooperative Exchange and N.C.
Cotton Growers Cooperative, speech to,
listed, 495.
Farmers Cooperative Exchange Mill,
speech to, listed, 510.
Farmers Market, operated by Department
of Agriculture, 23; purchased by state,
36.
Farthing, H. Grady, 705.
Faulk, William G., Jr., 658.
Fayetteville Area Industrial Education
Center, speech at, listed, 498.
Fayetteville State Teachers College, speech
at, listed 518; trustee appointments for,
718.
Fayetteville Technical Institute, trustee
appointments for, 718-719.
Fearing, Keith, 749.
Fearing, M. Keith, Jr., 712.
Federal Aid to Education, Interim Study
Committee on, 434-439.
764
Index
Federal Area Redevelopment Act, 265.
Federal Bureau of Investigation, connec-
tion of Sanford with, xxii.
Federal Housing Administration, 213, 376;
dedication of Greensboro office of, 146-
147.
Federal Trade Commission, 407, 415; testi-
mony before, 405.
Federation of Music Clubs, speech at,
listed, 498.
Ferebee, Percy, 708.
Ferguson, Fred H., 701.
Ferguson, Mrs. R. S., 672.
Ferrell, C. D., 703.
Ferrell, Joseph F., 704, 746.
Ferrer, Jose, 713.
Fetch, 0. A., 699n.
Fichlander, Zelda, 447, 447ti.
Ficklen, Louis Stuart, 694.
Fields, William C, 666, 700, 740.
Figge, Frank, quoted, 413.
Filipski, James E., 676.
Film Board, appointments to, 742; estab-
lishment of, 444.
Fincannon, Lindsay N., 728.
Finch, Mrs. Beth, 719.
Fire departments, role of, in civil defense,
287.
Firemen's Pension Fund, directors of, 678.
Fischer, John, 382.
Fisher, Ernest, 664.
Fitts, Howard M., 749.
Fitz, J. D., 708.
Fitzpatrick, W. W., 693n.
Flanagan, Eleanor, 729.
Flat Rock Playhouse, 443.
Fleishman, Joel L., 652.
Fleming, A. F., 735n.
Fletcher, Fred, 699n.
Fletcher, Mrs. Inglis, 665n, 667n, 682;
speech at festivities honoring, listed,
493.
Fletcher, Maria Beale, pictured, facing
324.
Fletcher, Mrs. Paul L., 719.
Flood Control Subcommittee, statement to,
580-582.
Flora, J. Everette, 692.
Flowers, William L., 664.
Floyd, Carlisle, 445, 445n.
Floyd, E. Y., 678.
Flue-Cured Tobacco . . . Stabilization Cor-
poration, directors of, 678.
Fluharty, W. B., Jr., 728.
Foglia, Mrs. Virginia, 689.
Foil, Joseph Orchard, 695.
Folger, A. D., Jr., 672.
Food Brokers Dinner, addressed by San-
ford, 456-457; speech at, listed, 505.
Food Brokers Week, 457.
Food Dealers Association, speech at, list
ed, 492.
Food industries, Garner, 271; Gerber, 26&
Food Processing and Marketing Confer
ence, addressed by Sanford, 233.
Food processing industry, TV address ]yi
Sanford on, 266-273.
Food Service Association, speech at, listed^j
514.
Food surplus, importance of, 159-165.
Food tax, see Taxes.
Football Hall of Fame Dinner, speech at!
listed, 517.
Forbus, Sample B., 689n.
Ford, Richard B., 714.
Ford Foundation, 612; contributes to tM
N.C. Fund, xxxii, 391, 392, 420, 601.
Fordham, Chris C, Jr., 709n.
Foreign policy, U.S., endorsed by Sari
ford, 102-106.
Foreign Students, Governor's Conferenci
for, speech at, listed, 501.
Forests, conservation and management ot
22, 53, 175, 209.
Forlines, John A., Jr., 714.
Forrest, Mary B., 683.
Forsyth, Mrs. H. Frank, 745.
Forsyth County Technical Institute, trust
tee appoinments for, 719.
Fort Bragg, 169, 177.
Fortson, J. C, 736.
Foster, D. Russell, Jr., 730.
Foster, Harley B., 662.
Foster, John, 749.
Foster, S. D., 729n.
Foundations group, addressed by Sanford"
421.
Fountain, Ben E., Jr., 673.
Fountain, George M., 655n.
4-H Club, Negro, holds sale at Rockj
Mount, 109; program of, 36; speech a
Center, Chinqua-Penn Plantation, listed
519; Week Meeting of, addressed b^^
Sanford, 159-165.
Foust, J. D., 658.
Fox, John H., 708.
Fox, Powell G., 688.
Fraley, John F., 749.
Fraley, John L., 670, 716.
Frank, John, 712.
Frank, Stanley, 676.
Franklin, F. C, 718, 734.
Franklin, Frederic, 447, 447n.
Eraser, Thomas A., 744, 747.
Frederick, Claude, 719.
Freedom Association World Peace Award
presented to Frank P. Graham, 165.
Freedom riders, xxxiii, 336.
Index
765
Freeman, Claire, lOln.
Freeman, Jere D., Jr., 737, 737^1.
Freeman, Orville, 160 ; addresses Weeks
Law celebration, 175; introduction of,
listed, 495, 502.
Friday, William C, 64, 64n, 674, 741, 744;
pictured, facing 172, 429, 611; serves as
LINC organizer, 612.
Friday, Mrs. William C, 668.
Fry, H. E., 730, 731n.
Frye, Mrs. John L., 671.
Fulcher, Fairley, 710.
Fulcher, Garland F., 667, 667n.
Fuller, Walter, 50, 50n, 600, 658, 676;
serves as Director of Water Resources,
710.
Fulp, James N., 730.
Funeral Directors and Morticians Asso-
ciation, speech at, listed, 504.
Funk, Guy, 728.
Futorian-Stratford Furniture Company,
speech at, listed, 503.
Futrell, Ashley B., 702, lOSn, 746.
Future Farmers of America, 36; groups
of, addressed by Sanford, 120-121, 128-
129, 351-352; week honoring, 109.
Future Homemakers of America, speech
to, listed, 502.
G
Gaddy, Claude F., 689n.
Gainey, John, 733.
Gallagher, Josephine, 699n.
Gallaher, John K., 730.
Galloway, Alex, 750.
Gambill, Robert, 723.
Gamble, Spencer D., 722.
Garden, Mrs. Nick, 720.
Gardner, O. Max, 4, An, 7, 338, 431, 432.
Gardner, Mrs. O. Max, 720.
Gardner, 0. Max, Jr., xxiii.
Gardner (O. Max) Award dinners,
speeches for, listed, 492, 501.
Gardner-Webb Junior College, 232-233.
Garibaldi, Linn D., 695.
Garinger, Elmer Henry, 260, 260n.
Garland, Mrs. James Boyce, 715.
Garvey, Robert, 669n.
Gaskill, Monroe, 667, 702, 746.
Gaskins, E. D.. 67, 67n, 656, 657n, 662,
QQSn, 669, 671n.
Gasoline and Oil Inspection Board, ap-
pointments to, 727.
Gasoline tax, see Taxes, on gasoline.
Gaston, Harley B., 734.
Gaston College, 472-473.
Gattis, S. M., 688.
Gavin, Mrs. Reba, 685n.
Gavin, William, 716.
Gaylord, Louis W., Jr., 686.
General Assembly of 1868, establishes
court system, 278.
General Assembly of 1941, passes Humber
Resolution, 104.
General Assembly of 1947, establishes Art
Museum, 442.
General Assembly of 1953, enacts legis-
lation restricting KKK, 623-624.
General Assembly of 1957, creates Divi-
sion of Community Planning, 52; enacts
Work Release Law, 318.
General Assembly of 1959, considers court
reforms, 279, 350; legislation enacted
by, 208, 236, 350.
General Assembly of 1961, 202, 240, 551;
appointments to, 653-654; budget mes-
sage to, 11-25; budget of, 69-70, 559;
court reforms considered by, 141, 266,
278, 281, 283; educational improvements,
endorsed by, 70, 138, 151, 153, 176-178,
198-199, 204, 222, 237, 319, 323, 346, 354-
355, 360, 576, proposed to, 26-33, 93-
102, passim, 116, 120, 133; legislation
enacted by, 34, 36, 44, 59, 63, 70, 140-
142, 153, 164, 199, 208, 218, 236, 238,
347-348, 379, 388, 571; programs con-
sidered by, 121, 350.
General Assembly of 1963, 240; addressed
by Sanford, 34-85; educational improve-
ments endorsed by, 83-84, 86, 97, 328,
346, 354-355; legislation enacted by, 344-
351, 354-355, 359, 379, 417, 458, 460,
462-463, 470-471, 473, 475, 585, 592, 607;
pictured, facing 64; programs consider-
ed by, 50, 85, 209, 295-301, 350, 587-591,
594-595; provisions of, for the mentally
retarded, 359-364, 380, 486, 585-592;
see also Reapportionment and Redis-
tricting.
General Assembly of 1963, Special Ses-
sion, 527, 599-600, 606, 638-639; ad-
dressed by Sanford, 86-88.
General Assembly of 1965, predictions re-
garding, 471.
General Contractors, Licensing Board for,
appointments to, 726.
General Electric Outdoor Lighting De-
partment, speech to, listed, 491.
General Fund, 14-23, passim, 69-72, pas-
sim, 567.
General Statutes Commission, 47 ; appoint-
ments to, 678.
Gennett, Andrew, 669.
Gentry, Worth, 697.
George Peabody College, speech at, listed,
495.
766
Index
George Washington Statue Commission,
appointments to, 709,
Gerrymandering, 141.
Gettysburg, Battle of, speeches commemo-
rating, listed, 513, 515.
Giannini, Vittorio, 447, Uln, 712, 740.
Gibbs, Mrs. Lambeth, 664.
Gibbs, Milo, 681.
Gibson, A. B., 707n.
Gibson, A. E., Sr., 722.
Gibson, Berry C., 678.
Gibson, J. Nelson, Jr., 705.
Gibson, Rushian J., Glln.
Gibson, William H., 694.
Giezentanner, John H., 713.
GiflFord, Mrs. Lester, 528.
Gilbert, Robert H., 719.
Gill, Edwin M., 65, 65n, 658, 709, 734;
pictured, facing 65; serves as State
Treasurer, 651.
Gillam, Carroll H., 703.
Gilliatt, Mrs. C. L., 671.
Gilmore, Glenn, 657n.
Gilmore, Thomas O., 656.
Gilmore, Voit, 669%, 683.
Glenn, Dorothy, 720.
Glenn, James Kirk, 680.
Glenn, Robert Broadnax, 3, 3n.
Gobble, F. L., 655n.
Godfrey, Horace, 110, IIOt^, 160.
Godwin, Mrs. Louise, 749.
Godwin, R. C, 675.
Godwin, Winfred, 612.
Goedberg, Joseph, 566.
Goerch, Carl, 719n. /
Goforth, David L., 731n.
Goforth, Mark, 693n.
Gold, Charles F., 506, 651, 651n, 653n,
723; statement on death of, 566.
Golden Age Banquet, speech at, listed, 498.
Goldwater, Barry, 403.
Good Neighbor Council, 277-278, 315, 329,
334, 336, 452, 625; addressed by San-
ford, 600-601; appointments to, 743;
establishment of, xxxiv-xxxv, 475, 579-
580; pictured, facing 600.
Good Will Industries, 361.
Goodman, R. H., 660, 661n.
Goodman, Raymond W., 605, 605n.
Goodnight, Mrs. Neil, 696.
Goodson, Gordon, 747.
Goodwin, Cleon W., 657, 657n.
Goodwin, George R., 707.
Goodwin, Lester M., Jr., 671.
Goodwin, William E., Jr., 731.
Gordon, Clyde W., lOln.
Gordon Foods Plant, speech at, listed, 514.
Gore, Edward M., 736.
Gore, Harry O., 743.
Gore, M. C, 736.
Gossett, Robert L., 729.
Government, Institute of, xxi, xxiii, 76
113, 249, 312.
Government, local and state, 254-260, 375:
432, 629-634.
Government Procurement Conference.
speech at, listed, 513.
Governor, office of, 77, 649-650.
Governor Richard Caswell Memorial Com-
mission, appointments to, 666.
Governor's Commissions, see titles alpha-
betized under primary word of subject
Governor's Conference on Economic Devel-
opment, addressed by Sanford, 190.
Governor's Conference on Education, ad- j C
dressed by Sanford, 468-469.
Governor's Conferences, National, ad
dressed by Sanford, 253, 434-439.
Governor's School, xxix, 388, 395, 417, 446, il
447, 486; addressed by Sanford, 339-1
343.
Grabarek, Wense, 747. 4
Graham, A. H., 683. -
Graham, Billy, 429, 517; pictured, facingi
429.
Graham, Mrs. Charles, 656.
Graham, Frank P., xxxvi, 105, 105n, 165.
Graham, Mrs. Frank P., 682.
Graham, Fred B., 724.
Graham, Frederick Dale, 694.
Graham, James A., 711, 711n; pictured,,!
facing 65; serves as Commissioner oft
Agriculture, 651, 653.
Graham, Jim, 673.
Graham, John W., 682.
Grange, 165; addressed by Sanford, 285.
Grant, J. Marse, 743.
Grant, Percy G., 667, 684.
Granville County, location of industries i
in, 221-222.
Gravely, P. K., 723n.
Gravely Sanatorium, 45.
Graves, Russell, 740.
Graves, S. Porter, 725n.
Gray, Arbor, 169.
Gray, Charles, Sr., 695n.
Gray, James A., 745.
Gray, James A., Jr., 742.
Gray High School, 619.
Great Smoky Mountains National Park,
54.
Green, Boyce T., 731.
Green, Fletcher M., 658.
Green, James C, 716.
Green, John W., 687.
Green, N. Cortez, 685.
Green, Paul, 442, 442w, 447, 667u, 712, 740,
742.
Index
767
Greene, Harold, 734, 735n.
Greenwood, Gordon H., 674.
Greenwood, Thompson, 743.
Gregg, Fred G., 731n.
Gregory, Mrs. Edwin C, 707n.
Gregory, Mrs. Quentin, Glln.
Gretter, William Carrington, Jr., 665.
Greup, Ernie, 668.
Grice, Theodore N., 725.
Grier, Joseph W., 674.
Grier, Mrs. Virginia H., 749.
Grier, W. C, 675.
Grierson, John, 742. ' "
Griffin, C. Frank, 716.
Griffin, Clarence W., 718.
Griffin, Edward F., 61, 61n, 659w, 666.
Griffin, Lloyd, 667%.
Griffith, Brodie S., 748.
Griffith, James W., 725.
Griffith, Motte, 640-642.
Griggs, Walton S., 659n.
Gross, Paul M., 704.
Grossett, Robert L., 729n.
Gudger, C. H., 726.
Guilkey, Margaret Whitmire, 739%.
Guion, J. H., 726.
Gunn, T. M., 731n.
Gurganus, Edgar, 696.
Gurkin, Luther Warren, Jr., 669.
Guthrie, Harold Lee, 666.
Guy Phillips School, speech at, listed, 519.
Guyton, Ebert Gerald, 671.
Gwyn, Allen H., Jr., 528, 674, 675%, 741.
Gwyn, Allen H., Sr., 697.
Gwyn, Julius J., 721.
H
Hagan, Charles T., Jr., 667n.
Haigwood, Marie, 707%.
Hair, Mrs. Samuel, 741.
Hair, Samuel C, 666.
Hairfield, T. R., 664.
Hairston, Peter W., 731%.
Halifax Resolves, 399, 475. ^
Hall, Claude T., 656.
Hall, James Bartlett, 730.
Hall, Louise, 709.
Hall, R. Dave, 677%.
Ham, George C, 690.
Hamilton, Mrs. Geneva B., 743.
Hamilton, Harry V., 684.
Hamilton, Horace, 742.
Hamilton, Richard C, 728.
Hamlin, Edwin J., 654, 683.
Hamlin, J. J., Jr., 703%.
Hamlin, R. E., Jr., 732.
Hammer, Philip, 632.
Hammond, J. Hyatt, 747.
Hammonds, Albert E., 721%.
Hammonds, Steve, Jr., 721%.
Hampton, Woody Robert, 670.
Hamrick, Claude M., 654, 706, 719.
Handicapped, Governor's Committee on
Employment of the, appointments to,
674-676; Governor's Executive Commit-
tee on Employment of the, appointments
to, 676-677; speeches to Committee on
Employment of the, listed, 509, 515.
Hanes, Gordon, 632, 665, 679, 724, 747.
Hanes, R. Philip, Jr., 699, 712; serves as
President of State Arts Council, 740.
Hanes, Ralph P., 658.
Hanson, Karl, 730.
Hanson, Louis A., 694.
Harbison, Laura, 692.
Hardee, Lewis J., 667.
Harden, John, 695%.
Hardesty, Ivan, 149, 149%.
Harding, Edmund H., 666.
Harding, Grayson, 665.
Hardison, Janice, 700.
Hardy, Herbert, 642.
Hargett, Mrs. lona T., 654.
Hargett, John M., 655%.
Hargrove, Eugene A., 48, 48%, 689%, 739.
Harman, Avraham, speech on honoring of,
listed, 511.
Harper, Mrs. James M., Jr., 665.
Harrell, Grady S., 727%.
Harriett-Henderson Cotton Mills, strike
at, 552.
Harrington, J. J., 672.
Harrington, Tom, Sr., 686.
Harris, Arthur Bell, 717,
Harris, Mrs. Bernice Kelly, 688.
Harris, C. H., 684.
Harris, Mrs. Charles U., 668.
Harris, Fred E., 702.
Harris, J. A., 731.
Harris, James J., 723%.
Harris, W. C, Jr., 741.
Harriss, Clyde Hampton, Sr., 13, 13%.
Harriss, J. Welch, 682.
Hart, Deryl, 741.
Hartford, C. E., 724.
Hartsfield family, winery of, 271.
Hartzog, Mrs. Grace M., 675%.
Harvard University, lecture delivered at,
380-396.
Harwood, Mrs. E. G., 673.
Hatcher, H. J., 653%.
Hatfield, John B., 677.
Hatteras National Seashore Park Com-
mission, 54.
Hawfield, S. Glenn, 656.
Hawkins, C. B., 674.
Hawkins, Dula, 713.
768
Hawkins, Oren D., 671^.
Hawkins, Reginald A., 720, 743.
Hawley, C. S., 696.
Hawley, Herbert L., 676.
Hayes, Barton, 673.
Haynes, A. Myles, 654.
Hayworth, Charles E., 669.
Health, goals of southern governors com-
mitment to, 397; see also Environmental
Health Center.
Health, State Board of, xxx, 45, 76, 422;
activities of department of, 359-360;
appointments to, 678; appropriations
for, 20, 591; Civil Defense activities of,
287 ; programs of, 44-45 ; see also Mental
Health, Occupational Health, U.N.C.
School of Public Health.
Health Careers Congress, speech at, listed,
511.
Health Center, Chapel Hill, expansion of,
188.
Health Insurance Advisory Board, ap-
pointments to, 678-679.
Heart, American Association, report of,
mentioned, 416.
Heater, R. 0., 731.
Heath, Charles, 735n.
Hedgebeth, Sherwood, 723.
Hedgpeth, Louten R., 727n.
Hedrick, Mrs. B. V., 715n.
Hedrick, Robert A., 714.
Helder, H. A., 723n.
Henderson, David, pictured, facing 626.
Henderson, David E., 734.
Henderson, J. Floyd, 734.
Henderson, James A., 727n.
Henderson, Mary, 683.
Henderson, William F., 62, 62n, 634, 660,
690.
Hendren, Linville L., 694.
Henley, John T., 652, 653n.
Henson, Thomas, 715.
Hepler, Howard, 694.
Herbert, George, 660, 704.
Herbert, W. P., Jr., 744.
Herbin, Mrs. Sarah W., 748.
Heritage Square, 610; appointees to com-
mission for, 679-680.
Herndon, George, 688.
Herring, Issiah H., 736, 737n.
Herring, Livious D., 736.
Herring, W. Dallas, 40, 40n, 673, 674,
67591, 741, 744, 745; as organizer of
LINC, 611; pictured, facing 611.
Hess, Robert, 677,
Hester, Oka T., 700.
High, L. Sneed, 701.
High Point College, graduates addressed
by Sanford, 135.
Index
Higher education, increased cost of, 20; ^
legislative acts concerning, 347-348, 354, t
355, 417-418, mentioned in Chowan ad- \
dress, 464, private schools aided by, i |
439, provisions of, outlined, xxviii-xxix; '
needs of, 208, 210; New England Board '
of, addressed by Sanford, 366; objec-
tives of, mentioned, 64; provision for,
by colleges, 157, 158, 297-299, 368; train- g
ing provided by, 115; see also Commis- i g
sion on Goals for Higher Education intj ^
the South, Community Colleges, Edu- 1 j
cation Beyond the High School, and see | j
names of individual colleges and uni- ! [
versities. | [
Higher Education, State Board of, 64, | j
295-296, 298, 299, 556, 633; appoint-
ments to, 674; long-range building pro- I j
gram of, 208; support of LINC by, 468. Li
Highsmith, Charles, 722. j
Hight, A. Turner, 735, 735n.
Hightower, Avery, 749. .|
Highway and Prison Employees Associa-I
tion, speech at, listed, 496.
Highway Conference, history of highways ii
summarized at, 216-220.
Highway Department, State, 38, 73, 164,1,
205, 384, 561 ; appointments to Commis- -
sion of, 680 ; appropriations for, 24 ; i;
Chairman of Commission of, 535 ; Com- |
mission of, enlarged, 142; finances of,?,
31, 220; helps develop tourist industry,*
124 ; involvement of Commission of, in ii
Webb controversy, 605; need for engi-
neers for, 245 ; new building for, 23 ; on i
revolving right-of-way purchase funds,
603 ; operations of, from Highway Fund,
73; reputation of, 219; right-of-way ac-
quisitions by, 52; sale of sign materials !
to, 561; support for Highway Fund by, |
24; swearing-in ceremonies of Commis-
sion of, speech on occasion of, listed,
494; testing laboratory of, purchase of,
23.
Highway Fund, 21; appropriations from,
23-25; discussed, 72, 73; estimated bal-
ance in, 14; for secondary road con-
struction, 32.
Highway Patrol, as arm of Civil Defense,
287; defense of, 619-620; in disasters,
384; is instructed to watch for viola-
tions by KKK, 624, 637; its episode with
''Hate Riders," xxxiii-xxxiv ; personnel
for, 25, 73, 78, 246-247.
Highway Safety Meeting on Project Im-
pact, speech at, listed, 504.
Highways, 132, construction and mainten-
ance of, 82, 584-585; death on, 205, 284,
349, 458; dedication of interstate link
I
Index
of, 275; discussed, 481-482; facts about,
584-585; financing of, 38, 142; history
of, 216-220; improvements in, 37, 205,
323; progress credited to, 275; road
building program of, 218, 603; tax
money for, 348; work done, in 1962, 37-
38; see also Bureau of Public Roads,
Traffic Safety, Traffic Safety Council.
Hill, Bill, 741.
Hill, J. Henry, Jr., 717w.
Hill, J. J., 661ti.
Hill, Maurice, 677.
Hill, Watts, Jr., 634, 678.
Hill, William D., Jr., 671.
Hillman, James E., 720.
Hillsborough, Historic Commission for,
appointments to, 683-684.
. Hines, Harvey C, 695n, 703, 746.
Hines, Hugh, 698, 69971.
Hinkle, James, 575.
iiHinnant, Milton N., 676.
^Hinsey, Joseph C, 690.
iHinson, Robin L., 678.
!Hipp, Edward B., 47, 47n.
*Hipp, Laurence R., 738.
sHipps, Harold, 698.
Historic shrines, 124.
Historic Sites Advisory Commission, ap-
pointments to, 684.
Historic towns, commissions for, see titles
alphabetized under name of town.
Hobbs, Marcus, 704.
Hobbs, Nicholas, 612.
Hobbs, S. H., Jr., 702.
Hobson, Wade M., 692.
Hodges, Luther H., 5, 5ti, 429, 456;
achievements of, 5, 7, 18, 387; appeal to,
for executive clemency, 552 ; budget pre-
pared by, 12, 417; criticism of, men-
tioned, 432; desegregation of schools be-
gun under, 336; interest of, in interstate
highways, 275; on education, 208; par-
ticipates in Kill Devil Hills ceremony,
398; pictured, facing 6, 429; promotion
of industry by, 482 ; receives SBI report
on Webb matter, 604.
Hodges, Mrs. Luther H., 681 ; pictured,
facing 6.
Hoey, Clyde R., 4, ^n.
Hoffman, Paul G., speech at presentation
of World Peace Award to, listed, 519.
Hoffmeyer, Ben Earl, 59, 59n.
, Hofler, J. D., 674.
i Hoggard, John T., 724.
Hogue, Mrs. Cyrus, Jr., 724.
iHoke County Golden Jubilee, speech at,
listed, 494.
Holbrook, J. Sam, 673.
Holderness, Howard, 740.
769
Holding, Lewis R., 662.
Holding, Robert, 750.
Holding, Robert P., llln.
Holding (W. W.) Industrial Center, dedi-
cation of, 400-401.
Holliday, Joseph Q., 706.
Holloway-Reeves, 470.
Hollowell, L. B., 653.
Holly, Howard, 714.
Holly, Jack, 701.
Holmes, J. B., 747.
Holmes, Mrs. William Daniel, 667w.
Home Builders Association, addressed by
Sanford, 367.
Home Demonstration Clubs, State Coun-
cil Meeting, speech at, listed, 513.
Home rule, discussed, 254-260.
Hondros, Nick, 698.
Honeycutt, Ava L., Jr., 659w.
Honigman, Mrs. Maurice, 699w.
Hood, Henry T., 671.
Hood, Joe W., 662, 663w.
Hooks, W. Jack, 655^, 697ti.
Hooper, E. W., 739n.
Hooper, Glen, 678.
Hoover, J. Edgar, 553.
Hoover, Maurice W., 269, 269ti.
Hopkins, Everett, 744; pictured, facing
611.
Hopkins, John I., 660.
Hord, Thomas B., Jr., 702, 746.
Horne, Josh L., 658.
Horne, Mrs. Mirium, 736.
Horner, Jack, lOln.
Horner, W. E., 719w.
Horner, William Edwin, 680.
Horton, Mrs. B. Tate, 711.
Horton, Doris G. (Mrs. Harry), 674, 744;
pictured, facing 611.
Hosiery, National Association of Manu-
facturers of, addressed by Sanford, 333;
state output of, 215; see also Industry.
Hospital Care Association, speech at, list-
ed, 511.
Hospitals, construction of, 209; funds for,
350 ; state mental, funds for, 20-21, sys-
tem of, 485 ; see also Mental hospitals.
Hospitals Board of Control, 57, 318, 590;
appointments to, 684-685.
Hough, John, 724.
House, Ernest J., 688.
House of Representatives, appointments
to, 654; monetary committees of, 67,
186; reapportionment of, 43; see also
General Assembly, reapportionment and
redistricting.
Housing Act of 1961, 146, 214.
Housing and Home Finance Agency, grant
from, 631.
770
Index
Howard, Dexter E., 733.
Howard, Moses, 732.
Howe, Harold, 468, 468n.
Howe, Harold III, 744.
Howell, Jimmy, 701.
Howland, Richard H., 682.
Hubbard, Charles S., 698.
Hubbard, E. C, 658.
Hubbard, Fred, 689n.
Hubbard, J. M., 719.
Huff, J. L., 684.
Huff, Joseph, 728.
Hufham, James W., 735.
Hughes, L. Roy, 738.
Hughey, Mrs. Elizabeth A., 739.
Hughey, Elizabeth H. (Mrs. Miles A.),
56 , 5671, 698.
Humber, Robert, 658, 659, 664, 678, 682,
740.
Humber Resolution, calls for peace organi-
zation, 104.
Humbert, Calvert H., 701.
Hundley, J. H., 692.
Hunt, Joseph M., Jr., 711?i.
Hunt, Malcolm R., pictured, facing 325.
Hunt, Nile F., 691.
Hunt, William S., 657n.
Hunter, Gordon Coble, 670.
Hunter, John Victor III, 660.
Hunter, Lloyd D., 701.
Hunter, Richard M., 725.
Hunter, Thomas B., 722.
Huntley, Charles H., 677.
Huntley, Watt, 736.
Hurst, B. B., 710.
Hutaff, Mrs. Julian B., 115n.
Hyde County, proclaimed disaster area,
525.
lanni, Francis, 612.
Ideal Cement Company, speech at, listed,
505.
Illiteracy, 308, 341. ... - . >
Inaugural address, 3-8.
Income, 404; statistics on, 116, 123, 331,
427, 565, 630.
Income tax, see Taxes, on income.
Industrial Commission, 43, 422; appoint-
ments to, 685.
Industrial development, 22, 38, 134, 203,
206, 261-262, 403; speech on, listed, 520.
Industrial Development Conferences, ad-
dressed by Sanford, 122-126, 129, 136-
137, 174, 190-191, 211-212, 403.
Industrial Development Foundation, ad-
dressed by Sanford, 214.
Industrial Education Centers, 393; ad-
dressed by Sanford, 260-265, 400-401;
speech at, listed, 513.
Industrial Engineers and Consultants^
speech to, listed, 509. |
Industrial Realtors, speech to, listed, 495.
Industry, 111, 123-124, 131-135, 261, 321-
322, 325-327, 377, 449-450, 574-576; in-i
vestments in, 214, 459; promotion of^,
xxx-xxxi, 253, 322.
Industry Appreciation Day, speech at^
listed, 516. '
Ingle, Paul I., 654.
Institute of Government, xxi, xxiii, 76fl
113, 249, 312; Training Center for De4l
linquency and Youth Crime, established:
there, 312. I
Institute of Religion, addressed by Sam
ford, 424-425.
Insurance Advisory Board, appointments^
to, 685-686.
Insurance Agents Association, 496, 509. ;
Insurance Company Executives, speech to!
listed, 493. j
Insurance Department, 76.
Insurance laws, 43.
Interstate Cooperation, Commission one
77; appointments to, 686.
Interstate Services, Inc., 561-563.
Investment Brokers, 375-376.
Irons, C. F., 728. ""t
Irving, Vivian E., 664. I
Ives, Mrs. Ernest L., 666, 683, 709.
Ives, G. Allen, 727n. . j
Ivey, James E., 658. §1
Ivey, John, 612. |
J
Jackson, Fred, 612. ' ■
Jackson, Jasper Carlton, 619n.
Jackson, Roger R., Jr., 65571, 719n.
James, H. Brooks, 36, S6n, 205, 273. i
James, V. Johnson, 673. J
James, Vernon G., 707, 712.
James, W. D., 699n.
James, Mrs. W. D., Sr., 728.
James, William D., 688.
Jameson, A. L., 660. I
Jarmon, Frank, 699. ^' I
Jarrell, Malcolm, 553.
Jarrett, J. M., 730, 731.
Jarrett, Scott, participates in press con-
ference, 639-646, passim.
Jefferson-Jackson Day dinners, 189; in-
troduction of Lyndon Johnson at, 327;
speeches at, listed, 502, 518.
Jeffress, A. H., e6Sn.
Jeffress, Carl 0., 747.
Jeffries, J. W., 743.
Index
771
Jenkins, Mrs. Arthur C, 700.
Jenkins, John R., Jr., 717, 717n.
Jenkins, Leo W., 660, 741.
Jenkins, W. S., 668.
Jenson, Howard E., 663n.
Jernigan, Mrs. D. M., 664, 665n.
Jernigan, Robert H., Jr., 654.
Jervis, John E., 743.
Jewish Home for the Aged, addressed by
Sanford, 423-424.
Jinnette, Ralph E., 723.
Job Corps, 420; week for, designated, 572-
573.
Jocher, Katharine, 693%.
John XXIII, death of, 595.
Johnson, Amos N., 690.
Johnson, C. Walton, 698.
Johnson, Mrs. Charles M., 667n.
Johnson, Charles M., Jr., 696.
Johnson, Charles M., Sr., xiii, 662, 663%.
Johnson, Gerald, 475.
Johnson, Mrs. Guion G., 748.
Johnson, Mrs. Guy, 742. v •
Johnson, Harry L., 688. : > . ;
Johnson, Jesse Clyde, 662. m^ .-
Johnson, Jimmy V., 690.
Johnson, Lynda Bird, pictured, facing 626.
Johnson, Lyndon B., 338, 424, 456, 635;
anti-poverty program of, 614-616; din-
ner honoring, addressed by Sanford,
334-338; introduction of, listed, 520;
invites Sanford to Washington, xxxii-
xxxiii; pictured, facing 428, 626; San-
ford's impressions of, 608-609; speaks
at Jefferson-Jackson Day Dinner, 327 ;
welcomed at Rocky Mount, 425-428.
Johnson, Mrs. Lyndon B., pictured, facing
626; whistle stop tour of, 634-635.
Johnson, P. Greer, 705.
Johnson, Ralph F., 699n.
Johnson, Mrs. Robert Grady, 6Qln.
Johnson, Stanley H., 670.
Johnson, William A., 654, 701, 701n.
Johnson, Wingate M., 739, 739n.
Johnson C. Smith University, 459.
Johnson-Humphrey Democratic ticket,
Sanford comments on, 629.
Johnson-Humphrey rally, speech at, list-
ed, 520.
Johnston, Frontis W., 669n, 711.
Johnston, Homer L., 736.
Johnston, James M., 683.
Joint Council on Health and Citizenship,
speech to, listed, 497.
Jolly, Mrs. Wilbur, 712.
Jolly, Wilbur M., 672.
Jones, A. J., 719n.
Jones, Arthur H., 677, 677n.
Jones, B. T., 706.
Jones, Bruce F., 743. ,
Jones, Edwin L., 721n. •
Jones, Frank W., 678.
Jones, G. Andrew, Jr., 621, 621n, 652, 707.
Jones, Graham, 131, 555, 642, 652.
Jones, J. Kempton, 664.
Jones, J. Wesley, Jr., 664.
Jones, R. Austin, 672.
Jones, Samuel 0., 724.
Jones, Victor Emsley, 694.
Jones, Walter Clark, Jr., 727.
Jones, Walter H., 730.
Jordan, B. Everett, 160, 160n, 477, 581.
Jordan, Henry W., 666.
Jordan, John R., Jr., 674, 709, 742.
Jordan, Ted, 680.
Joslin, William, 44, 44n, 574.
Joslin, Mrs. William, 658.
Joyner, David Worth, 680.
Joyner, J. Y., 235n.
Joyner, Lauris K., 671.
Joyner, Thomas Ghio, 656.
Joyner, William T., 661.
Judd, Dan S., 674, 616n.
Judicial Council, 50.
Judicial Officials, appointments listed, 654-
656. :
Julian, I. B., 69Sn.
Junior Chamber of Commerce, 108;
speeches to, listed, 500, 503, 512, 517.
Junior Colleges, Convention of American
Association of, addressed by Sanford,
406.
Justice, Charlie, 749.
Justice, R. B., 69Sn, 695n.
Justice Department, 76; investigates Elsie
Webb controversy, 603.
Juvenile delinquency, 205, 210, 312, 313;
conference on, speech at, listed, 504.
Juvenile Delinquency and Youth Crime,
Committee on, 63; Training Center on,
312.
Juvenile Evaluation and Treatment Cen-
ter, 21, 63, 188.
K
Kaiser, Helen, 721n.
Kallam, John L., 708.
Kavanagh, Roger Price, Jr., 669.
Kearns, Amos, 671n.
Keel, Bennie C, 658.
Keith, Graeme M., 747.
Kellenberger, John A., 683, 709. ^ :
Kelly, Mrs. Annie Ruth, 697. ^
Kelly, Harry C, 704.
Kemp, Ramey F., 725.
Kemp, William P., 685.
Kenan, Frank H., Jr., 683.
772
Index
Kenan professors, 100.
Kendall, H. W., 684.
Kendall, Henry E., 42, 42?i, 739; serves
as Chairman of Employment Security
Commission, 677.
Kennedy, Mrs. Annie B., 748.
Kennedy, Edward, 429; pictured, facing
429.
Kennedy, John, 676.
Kennedy, John F., 7, 112, 167, 169, 171,
172, 196, 276, 285-286, 382, 432, 547,
565; accomplishments of, 214; foreign
policy of, 148; his proposed visit to
Chapel Hill, 174; memorial tribute to,
429-430; New Frontier of, 7, 104, 160,
184, 189, 236; pictured, facing 172;
quoted, 102, 104, 106, 171, 176-177;
Sanford's reaction to assasination of,
607-608; Sanford's support of, xxv, 456.
Kennedy, John P., Jr., 675n.
Kennedy, Mrs. Joseph P., 429, 430; pic-
tured, facing 429.
Kennedy Foundation, 420.
Kennedy-Johnson program, 627.
Kennedy Memorial Library, contributions
to, 419-420, 429, 621.
Kennerly, Taylor R., 691.
Kennett, H. C, 669n.
Kentucky Association for Mental Health,
addressed by Sanford, 396-397.
Keppel, Francis, 382, 394.
Kernodle, John R.^ 691.
Kerr Dam and Reservoir, 54; speech at,
listed, 519.
Kerr (John H.) Reservoir Development
Commission, 54; appointments to, 686.
Kesler, Mrs. B. B. C, 684.
Kesler, John, 673.
Kesler, John C, 686.
Kill Devil Hills First Flight Airport, ad-
dress at, by Sanford, 398-400.
King, Frank C, 662.
King, Homer S., 735.
King, Mrs. Huger S., 692.
King, L. D., Jr., 738.
King, Mrs. Raymond E., Jr., 666.
Kirby, J. Russell, 706.
Kirby, Mrs. J. Russell, 718.
Kirk, J. Sidney, 662, 663.
Kirkman, O. Arthur, 13, 13n, 665, 679,
722.
Kirkpatrick, Willis, 750.
Kirksey, Jack, 69 7n.
Kirksey, Jackson Bristol, 680.
TCistler, Mrs. Charles, 658.
Kitchin, Walton, 749.
Kitchin, William Walter, 3, Sn.
"Kitty Hawk," criticism of, 195-196.
Kivett, Charles T., 677.
Klass, Jack E., 738.
Kleimo, Carl E., 734, 735n.
Knight, Douglas M., 612, 744; pictured,
facing 611.
Knott, Mrs. George W., 666.
Knotts Island Ferry, speech at, listed, 505.
Knox, Joe, 673.
Koonce, Donald B., 664.
Koonce, S. G., 678.
Koonts, Henry V., ISln.
Koontz, Mrs. Edna E., 728.
Kornegay, Horace, 567-570.
Kramer, Mrs. John A., 682.
Kreps, Mrs. Juanita M., 748.
Kress Foundation, 49, 442.
Ku Klux Klan, 336, 623-624, 637.
L
Labor, 42, 43; Department of, 422, 618.
Labouisse, Mrs. John W., 683.
Lackey, E. G., 712.
Lackey, Walter C, 731^1.
Lake, I. Beverly, xxiv, 450.
Lambeth, J. E., 747.
Lambeth, James E., Jr., 748.
Lambeth, Thomas W., 549, 549n; serves as
Administrative Assistant, 652.
Lambeth, W. W., 747.
Lambeth, Walter, 710.
Land, Claude T., 725.
Land Grant College Centennial, speech
at, listed, 496.
Laney, Archie, 749.
Langston, C. Don, 528.
Lanier, Edwin Sidney, 43, 4Sn; pictured,
facing 65; serves as Commissioner of
Insurance, 651, 653.
Larkins, John, xxiv, 720, 743.
LaRoque, G. Paul, 732.
Larson, Arthur, 748.
Larson, Robert D., 566.
Lassister, Ben K., 716.
Lassiter, Charles C, 719.
Lassiter, Hanes, 721n.
Lassiter, Robert, 676.
Lassiter, Will H., 664.
Latham, Mrs. H. E., 705n.
Latham, James Farr, 655, 694, 695n.
Latta, Mrs. J. E., 679n.
Latta, P. R., 742.
Laurinburg Armory, speech at, listed, 502.
Law Day, designated, 586-587.
Law Day Banquet, speech at, listed, 513.
Law Enforcement Officer's Benefit and
Retirement Fund, appointees for, 686-
687.
Lawrence, C. Ray, 728.
Lawrence, Mrs. Graham, 750.
Index
773
Lawrence, W. R., 686, 687n.
Learning Institute of N.C., xxix, 417, 451,
468, 470, 478, 487, 611-613; appoint-
ments to, 744; directors of, 612-613;
pictured, facing 611.
Leary, A. T., Jr., 732.
Leary, Mrs. Leon G., 682.
LeCroy, T. H., 660.
Ledford, Hubert F., 678.
Ledford, Oscar, 710.
Lee, Finley, 729.
Lee, Fitzhugh H., 669n.
Lee, Hugh A., 721.
Lee, J. B., Jr., 688, 689ti.
Lefler, Hugh T., 6Q9n.
Legislative Building, 34; dedication of,
470-471.
Legislative Building, Commission on the
Dedication of the, appointments to, 687.
Legislative Building Commission, appoint-
ments to, 687.
Lehmkuhl, William M., 713.
Lehto, Mrs. Kauno A., 666.
Lenoir County Technical Institute, trus-
tee appointments for, 719.
Lentz, W. B., 687.
Leonard, Colvin, 742.
Lewellyn, Mrs. R. C, 679n.
Lewis, Anson, 735.
Lewis, Ben R., 709u.
Lewis, Mrs. Eloise R., 728.
Lewis, James S., 668, 669^.
Lewis, Meriwether, 726.
Libraries Fund, Public, 56.
Library, State, 17, 23, 56, 209; trustee
appointments for, 688; see also, Ar-
chives and History-State Library Build-
ing.
Liles, R. v., 690.
Lilly, Ed, 749.
Limon, Jose, 447, 447n, 712.
Lindahl, Roy L., 115n.
Lindley, John Van, 662.
Lineback, C. L., 688, 747.
Lineberger, J. Harold, 720, 723, 749. ,
Lineberger, Mrs. J. Harold, 682.
Lineberry, Stanhope, 666.
Lions Club, speech to, listed, 508.
Lipinsky, Louis, 740.
Lipinsky, Louis, Sr., 713.
Lippard, Vernon W., 690.
Little, William, 704.
Little People of America, speech to, listed,
510.
Littleton, Tucker R., 684.
Lloyd, Leonard W., 672.
Local Government Commission, appoint-
ments to, 688.
Local Government Employees' Retirement
System, trustee appointments for, 688.
Lockaby, Thomas B., Q55n.
Lockhart, John K., 729n.
Locklear, Harry W., 720.
Loewenstein, Edward, 743.
Loftin, E. L., 528.
Long, L. D., 12bn.
Long, Richard G., 109n.
Long, Robert, 668.
Long, W. Lunsford, 718, 719%.
Long Beach, appointments for, 735.
Long Manufacturing Company, 123-124.
Lost Colony, The, speeches at, listed,
495, 515, see also Drama.
Love, Gordon W., 736, ISln.
Love, J. Spencer, 268, 705, lObn.
Love, Mrs. J. Spencer, 705.
Lovette, Mrs. Fred, 724.
Lowry, Harvey, 720.
Lowry, John R., 731.
Lowry, Zeb, 721n. "
Lucas, Charles 0., 671n.
Lyles, M. Smoot, 672.
Lyman, W. Paul, 698.
M
Mabe, Ottis, 698.
Mabry, Claude J., Jr., 657.
Mabry, Wayne, 709.
McAden, Thomas C, 286.
McAden, Mrs. Thomas C, 286.
McAndrew, Gordon, 468, 468n.
McArthur, Douglas II, introduction of,
listed, 516.
McCain, John L., 691.
McCain, Mrs. P. P., 684.
McCain, Mrs. Sadie L., 722.
McCain Sanatorium, 45.
McCall, William A., 687.
McCallister, Ralph, 740, 744.
McCaskill, Lloyd C, 701.
McClamroch, Roland, 699.
McClellan, W. C, 731.
McClenegham, Mrs. Frank A., 715.
McConnell, David M., 674, 675n.
McConnell, John D., 654, 655^1.
McCord, W. S., 717.
McCorkle, Phil Ray, 671.
McCotter, Charles J., 702.
McCotter, J. Muse, 657n.
McCotter, Robert, 667.
McCoy, Reginald, 718.
McCrary, Mrs. Mary Jane, 668.
McCraw, Carl Greaves, 670.
McCray, W. Frank, 747.
McCullers, Charles L., 687n, 698.
McDaniel, Evander Worth, 727.
774
Index
McDonald, Ben, 675, 736.
MacDonald, K. A., 718.
McDonald, W. H., 723n.
MacDougall, William R., 256, 256n.
McDowell, Norfleet Owen, Jr., 729??.
McDuffie, Roger A., 716, 129n.
Mace, Borden, 742.
McFarland, William Austin, 685.
McGeachy, Hector, 700.
McGhee, Karl W., 672.
McGimsey, Margaret E., 707n.
McGirt, H. S., 695n.
McGuire, William B., 747, 750.
Mclntire, William C, Jr., 693n.
McKay, Mrs. Martha, 743.
McKellar, Angus, 528, 703.
MacKethan, Mrs. E. R., 717.
McKinne, Collin, 60, 60n.
McKnight, C. A., 601, 601n, 674, 716, 745.
McKnight, James E., 720.
MacLamroc, James G. W., 666, 680, 683.
McLauchlin, Cornelia, 707n.
McLaughlin, John Robbins, 685, 685w.
McLaurin, Roy D., 743.
McLawhorn, Charles, 692.
McLean, Angus W., 4, 4n, 217, 275, 431-
432, 461.
McLean, C. C, 732.
MacLean, Hector, 431, 653, 664, 668, 706,
709.
McLean, Thomas Rodwell, 680.
McLendon, L. P., 675u, 716, 742.
McMahon, Alex, 698, 742.
McMahon, John Alexander, 672.
McMillan, James B., 672.
McMillan, R. D., Jr., 706.
McMullan, Mrs. Harry, 666, 681.
MacNeill, Ben Dixon, 665n.
McNeill, John Lawrence, 722.
Macon Junior High School, speech at,
listed, 496.
McPherson, Holt, 730.
McQueen, James H., Qlln.
MacRae, James, 655.
MacRae, P. A., 716.
McShane, William T., 675n.
McSwain, Holland, 705.
''Made in North Carolina" Day, speech
for, listed, 505.
Madison, Blaine M., 63, 6Sn, 237, 691, 698.
Madison County, Mars Hill School, con-
troversy in, 548-551.
Madison-Mayodan School, speech at, list-
ed, 496.
Mahogany Association Awards Dinner,
speech at, listed, 491.
Mallard, Raymond B., 720.
Mann, Leon, Jr., 732.
Mann, M. G., 110, llOn.
Manning, John T., 678.
Marine Fisheries Commission, appoint-
ments to, 659.
Markham, Edwin, 156, 156%.
Markwood, Paul W., 713.
Mars Hill School controversy, settlement
of, 548-551.
Marsh, Mrs. G. W., 681.
Marsh, Mrs. Katharine H., 743.
MarshlDurn, Rodney, ISln.
Martin, D. Grier, 741.
Martin, Dan A., 729.
Martin, George W., 747.
Martin, Harry C, 655.
Martin, Mrs. Isobel Young, 697.
Martin, Lester P., Jr., 712.
Martin, Manley S., 731.
Martin, Ovid, 161.
Martin, Robert L., 720.
Martin, Ryan Walker, 670, 611n.
Marvin, Mrs. Helen Rhyne, 706.
Mary Reynolds Babcock Foundation, 392.
Maryland State Teachers Association, ad-
dressed by Sanford, 368-372.
Masland Duraleather Company, speech at,
listed, 493.
Mason, Mrs. Joseph C, 688.
Mason, W. H., 6Q7n.
Masons, speeches for, listed, 494, 519.
Massey, L. M., 706.
Massie, S. P., Jr., speech at inauguration t
of, listed, 518.
Massie, T. N., 711n.
Mast, Benjamin V., 742. M
Mateos, Lopez, 555-556. "
Matthews, Johnson, 58, 58n, 319, 675n.
Mattox, H. A., 742.
Mauney, Carl F., 723. ^
Mauney, D. R., Jr., 714. |
May, Hubert E., 655. |
Maynor, Carl L., 121n. '
Maynor, Thomas C, 701.
Mayo, P. B., 731n.
Mayors' Cooperating .Committee, 334.
Meads, Mason, 690.
Meares, Carl W., 696.
Meat Packers Association, speech for
listed, 492.
Mebane, John Gilmer, 129n.
Mecklenburg College, speech at, listed, I
503.
Medical Care Commission, 62, 188, 571;
appointments to, 688-689.
Medical care for indigents, 59, 571.
Medical Care Study Commission, appoint-
ments to, 690.
Medical Society of N.C., addressed by
Sanford, 187-188, 239-240, 422.
Meekins, D. Victor, QGlru
Index
775
Meekins, Ralph S., 667.
Meekins, Mrs. Victor, 746.
Meggs, N. E., 736, 737m
Meier, Richard F., 737.
Melvin, Hiram A., 736, ISln.
Melvin, Marley M., 730.
Memorial Hospital, funds recommended
for, 20; see also University of North
Carolina.
Menius, A. C, Jr., 704.
Mennin, Peter, 447, 447n, 712.
Mental Health, 350-351, 397; Board of, ap-
pointments to, 690, Medical Advisory
Council to the, appointments to, 690-
691; Commission of, 364; Department
of, 359, 360, 401, is established, 350-351,
363-364.
Mental Health Association, addressed by
Sanford, 396-397; speeches to, listed,
491, 513, 515.
Mental Health Business Administrators
Institute, speech to, listed, 504.
Mental Health Leadership Conference,
speech to, listed, 513.
Mental hospitals, system of, 48, 72, 207,
209, 276, 350, 485-486.
Mental retardation, xxx, 356-364, 389-390,
397, 417, 477-478, 587-591; Advisory
Council on, 359, 379, 380, 589, appoint-
ments to, 691-692; legislation concern-
ing, 359-364, 380, 486.
Mentally Retarded, Commission for the,
359, 380, 589; appointments to, 744-745.
Mercer, Jesse B., 701.
Merchants Association, speech to, listed,
491.
Meredith College, speech at, 500; speech
to alumnae of, listed, 494.
Merit System Council, appointments to,
692.
Meriwether, Shannon, 725.
Merritt, Robert E., 722.
Methodist College, 64; addressed by San-
ford, 292-301; speech at, listed, 497.
Methodists, addressed by Sanford, 251-
252, 277-278; speeches to, listed, 491,
498, 499, 504, 516, 517.
Mexico, statement on friendship with,
555-556.
Meyer, Harold, 715.
Meyer, Harold D., 739.
Mickle, D. Grant, 216, 604.
Middleton, David R., 742.
Middleton, E. F., 735.
Middleton, Herman, 740.
Middleton, Mrs. R. M., 715.
Midgett, Lorimer Willard, 669.
Midgett, P. D., Jr., 668.
Migrant labor, 44, 140, 238. 350, 643-645,
see also Agricultural Migrants, Gover-
nor's Committee on.
Milk Commission, appointments to, 692.
Milk Producers Cooperative, Inc., directors
for, 692.
Millard, Junius H., 693.
Miller, Clyde H., 671ti.
Miller, Mrs. Everette, 712.
Miller, J. Harry, 672.
Miller, Mrs. Max, 700.
Miller, Mrs. W. L. T., 716.
Milligan, Nivan, 736.
Milliken, John R., 715.
Mills, Ernest A., 713.
Mills, William B., 738.
Milner, Charles, 698.
Mims, Allen C, 675.
Mineral and Gem Festiv£.l, speech at,
listed, 505.
Minimum wage, 545, 594-595; legislation
concerning, 43, 140, 236, 350.
Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing
Company, 561-562.
Mitchell, Robert Clyde, 686.
Mitchell, S. H., 747.
Mobile Home Parks Convention, speech
at, listed, 517.
Mobley, H. P., 686.
Monday, W. I., 722.
Money lenders, abuses of, 140, 546.
Monk, Irwin, 709n.
Monroe, Mrs. Reid S., 722.
Montgomery County Industrial School,
speech at, listed, 517.
Moody, Jack, 696.
Moore, Clifton L., 623.
Moore, Cutler, 653n.
Moore, Mrs. Daisy S., 684.
Moore, Dan K., 450, 635; inauguration of,
529-530; political support of, 455, 456,
629.
Moore, Mrs. Dan K., 723, 744, 745.
Moore, Daniel E., 749, 749w.
Moore, E. James, 738.
Moore, Elizabeth Vann, 682.
Moore, G. Allie, Jr., 731.
Moore, George A., Jr., 732.
Moore, Henry W., 683.
Moore, J. H., 119n.
Moore, Lester N., 746.
Moore, Mrs. Margaret B., 672.
Moore, Myron L., Jr., 714.
Moore, Stanley W., 714.
Moore, Willie G., Jr., 658.
Moore General Hospital, Juvenile Evalua-
tion and Treatment Center at, 21.
Moose, Howard, 717.
Mootz, B. Lee, 689.
Morehead, David W., 711.
776 Index
Morehead, John M., 733, 734.
Morehead (John Motley) Dinner, speech
at, listed, 495.
Morehead (John Motley) Memorial Com-
mission, appointments to, 692.
Morehead Planetarium, 591.
Morgan, Ed W., 735.
Morgan, J. Irvin, Jr., 657n.
Morgan, J. V., 734.
Morgan, Lucy, 699n.
Morgan, Robert F., 584, 584n, 594.
Morrill Act, 437.
Morris, Mrs. George Maurice, 681.
Morris, Ralph T., 662.
Morris, Sam C, 528.
Morris, W. B., lOSn.
Morrison, Cameron, 4, 4n, 217; road pro-
gram of, 275, 431, 432, 461.
Morrison, Fred M., 673.
Morrow, C. Ray, 715.
Morrow, W. H., 673, 733.
Morse, Thomas W., 708, 709%.
Morton, Hugh, 621, 669%, 708.
Moss, W. T., 689n.
Mothers' Day, address on, 126.
Motor Carriers Association, speech to,
listed, 515.
Motor Vehicles, Department of, 76, 78;
financial support of, 21, 24, 25, 73;
statistics from, 231, 348-349.
Motto, of N.C., 421.
Mount Olive Junior College, speech at,
listed, 494.
Muilenburg, Mrs. Martha, 712.
Mulcahy, Francis W., 676.
Mulhern, Marvin J., 719.
Mullen, Jim F., 703.
Mullen, Thomas M., 675.
Municipal League, addressed by Sanford,
397-398.
Murchison, Wallace, 745.
Murdock, William H., 657%. »
Murphey, Archibald D., 228, 228%, 434.
Murphy, Charles, 110, 110%, 160.
Murphy, Clarence E., 737.
Murphy, Robert J., 683.
Murray, Paul, 666.
Museum of Art, 324; appropriations for,
442; collections at, 49, 442, 445; trustee
appointments for, 658.
Museum of Natural History, appointments
to Advisory Commission for, 694.
Musgrave, James L, 717.
Myrick, G. Harold, 663%.
Myrover, George, 668.
N
NASA, 474, 593.
Nagelschmidt, Joe, 664.
National Cemetery Memorial Day, speech
for, listed, 494.
National Committee for Support of Public i
Schools, addressed by Sanford, 328. i
National Conference of Christians and
Jews, 544.
National Council of Teachers of English,
addressed by Sanford, 472.
National Council on Crime and Delin-;
quency, 312.
National Defense Education Act, 18; fed-i!
eral aid from, 438.
National Education Association, xxvii;t
100, 477; addressed by Sanford, 454-1
455.
National forests, in N.C., 54.
National Geographic, treatment of N.C. in.ii
326, 563. '
National Guard, 61-62, 147-149, 276, 286,5
611; Advisory Board appointments to,]
693.
National Park, Parkway and Forests De-»
velopment Commission, N.C, 54; ap-)
pointments to, 693.
National Safety Council, breatholizeri:
test endorsed by, 586.
National Safety Engineers, 561, 563.
National Security Seminars, addressed by '
Sanford, 169-172; speech at, listed, 492.2
National Sportscasters and Sportswriters
Association, speech to, listed, 517.
National Sportswriters Awards Banquet,^
speech at, listed, 492.
Naumer, Helmuth J., 569%.
Needham, Ophelia W., 692. ^
Negroes, colleges for, 393; demonstra-a
tions of, 597-599; needs of, 277; prog-^
ress of, 332, 336, 578-579, 600; see also:
Civil rights.
Neill, Ralph, 548-551.
Nelson, J. A., 743.
Nesbitt, Andrew W., 680, 681%, 692.
New England, Board of Higher Education
of, 366; School Development Council of,!
380, 381.
New Frontier, see Kennedy, John F., New '
Frontier of.
New Hope Dam and Reservoir, 580, 582.
^ New Jersey Education Association, ad-*
dressed by Sanford, 469-470.
New South, 150, 157, 302-306.
Neway, Patricia, 445.
Newbern, H. D., Jr., 746.
News and Observer (Raleigh) 321; on
Highway 220 relocation, 603.
News-Argus (Goldsboro), 576.
News Conference, 638-647.
Newton, J. Clinton, 657%.
Newton, John Clinton, Jr., 680.
Index
777
Nicholas, Dan, 733.
Nichols, Mrs. Eva, 714, 715n.
Nicholson, Mrs. George, 677.
Nicholson, George E., 704.
Noah, Clarence Hugh, 708.
Noble, Alice, 684.
Noblin, Roy L., 716.
Noe, Mrs. Charles B., 726.
Nooe, Charles J., 660.
Nordan, Joseph W., 671.
Norfleet, Grizzelle M., 715.
Norman, Mrs. Anne Kinard, 714.
Norman, Fred Charles, 694.
North Carolina, 479-487, 543; articles on
development of, 629-634; assets of, 132,
137, 321-327, 609-610; progress of, 563,
595-596; statistics on, xxxi, 115-116;
various associations of (not listed
below), see titles alphabetized under
primary word of subjects.
North Carolina Association of Local and
County Historians, 445; addressed by
Sanford, 365-366.
"North Carolina Day," addressed by San-
ford, 320-327.
North Carolina Education Association,
addressed by Sanford, 176-183, 417-418,
460; educational improvements suggest-
ed by, xxvii; speeches to, listed, 493,
502, 512, 517, 518.
North Carolina Federation of Music Clubs,
445.
North Carolina Folklore Society, 445.
North Carolina Fund, xxxii, 365, 392, 404,
420-421, 424, 426, 427, 487, 601-602, 615;
director of, 617; directors, board of, ap-
pointments to, 745; federal grant to,
617-618; Nash-Edgecombe Area Steer-
ing Committee on, 427-428; North Caro-
lina Volunteers of, 615; proposed pro-
jects of, pictured, facing 601; support of
LINC by, 468. .
North Carolina Historical Commission,
365.
North Carolina Law Review, 133, 336.
North Carolina Literary and Historical
Association, 445.
North Carolina National Bank, dedication
address of, 301; speech to directors of,
listed, 507.
North Carolina Press Association, ad-
dressed by Sanford, xxxiv-xxxv, 106-107,
216, 401, 578-580; speech to, listed, 511.
North Carolina Products Luncheon, ad-
dressed by Sanford, 422-423.
North Carolina Railroad; appointments
for, 733-734.
North Carolina Society of Local and
County Historians, 445.
North Carolina Society of New York,
speech to, listed, 498.
North Carolina Society of Washington,
D.C., speech to, listed, 504.
North Carolina State College, 62; com-
mencement addresses at, listed, 494, 504,
514, 519; School of Agriculture at, 22,
36, addressed by Sanford, 233, 473-474,
Extension Service of, 22, 72, 165, 205,
273, Food Science Department of, xxxi,
36, 268, 373, 457, 473, 483; School of
Engineering at, addressed by Sanford,
217; speeches at, listed, 492, 497.
North Carolina Teachers Association, ad-
dressed by Sanford, 231-232; speech to,
listed, 517.
Northcott, J. G., 717.
Northwestern Mutual Insurance Company,
speech to, listed, 508.
Norton, J. W. R., 44, 44n, 738.
Norwood, Mrs. Charles, 677, Glln.
Nuclear Power Plant, speech at, listed,
510.
Nunley, Rachel L., 729^1.
Nurse Registration and Nursing Educa-
tion, Board of, appointments to, 727-728.
Nutrena Feed Mill, speech at, listed, 495.
O
O 'Berry School, Advisory Council to, ap-
pointments to, 716.
O'Brien, Prince, 694.
Occupational Health Conference, addressed
by Sanford, 422 ; speech at, listed, 513.
Occupational Health Council, 422; speech
to, listed, 491.
Ocean Isle Beach, commissioners for, list-
ed, 736.
O'Connor, Thomas Bernard, 677.
Odell, A. G., Jr., 663ti.
Odell, Mrs. C. Matthews, 748.
Oden, Carlos D., 664.
O'Donnell, Mrs. Pearl, 717.
Odum, Howard W., 92, 92%, 154.
Ohio Association of School Administra-
tors, addressed by Sanford, 379.
Ohio School Boards Association, addressed
by Sanford, 379.
Ohio School Business Officials, addressed
by Sanford, 379.
Ohio Valley Industrialists and Business-
men, addressed by Sanford, 130-135.
Old, Mrs. William T., 681.
Old Age Assistance, 21.
Old Salem, 441, 445.
Olive, Hubert E., 656, 738.
O'Neal, Dick, 6Qln,
778
Index
Oneto, Julian, 664, 746; pictured, facing:
574.
Oneto, Mrs. Julian, pictured, facing 574.
Operation Second Chance, xxix, 417, 470.
Opticians, State Board of, appointments
to, 728.
Optimist Club, 206; of Winston-Salem,
Carnegie Awards Banquet, addressed by
Sanford, 458; those in district conven-
tion, addressed by Sanford, 503.
Optometry, Board of Examiners in, ap-
pointments to, 728.
Order of the Golden Fleece, speech to,
listed, 493.
Oregon Inlet, 423.
Organization of American States, 337.
Orphanages, see names of individual in-
stitutions.
Orr, Oliver, 126.
Orthopedic Hospital, trustee appoint-
ments for, 720.
Osborne, Mrs. Jewel P., 676.
Osborne, Walter F., 693.
Osteopathic Examination and Registra-
tion, appointments to board of, 728.
Ouroussow, Eugenie, 447, 447n, 713.
Outdoor dramas, 49; institute for, 443;
see also drama and names of individual
dramas.
Outer Banks, 82, 398, 423, 611; mentioned
by astronauts, 399; preservation of,
535.
Outer Banks Seashore Park Commission,
349-350; appointments to, 746; estab-
lishment of, 534-535; speech to, listed,
505.
Owens, Hollis, 700.
Owens, Hollis M., Jr., 722.
Oxford Orphanage, trustee appointments
to, 720.
Pace, Robert, 676.
Page, Arvin, 726.
Page, Clarence E., Jr., 728.
Page, Irvine, quoted, 414.
Page, Troy, 732.
Page, Walter Hines, 92, 92n; quoted, 91,
154, 264.
Palamatier, Everett, 704.
Palmer, Glenn, 702.
Palmer, Jack, Jr., 706.
Palmer, Yates, 685.
Pamlico-Albemarle Schoolmasters Club,
speech at, listed, 503.
Parent-Teacher Association, 182 ; Fayette-
ville rally of, 113-114; responsibility of,
179; speech to Josephus Daniels group
of, listed, 513.
Parents and Teachers Congress, 1961 Con-
vention of, addressed by Sanford, 127.
Parker, Mrs. B. C, 745.
Parker, Ernest, promotes Sanford for
Vice-President, 628.
Parker, Ernest Elbert, Jr., 670.
Parker, John, 665, 679.
Parker, R. Hunt, 666, 668.
Parker, Roy, Jr., 694; participates in
press conference, 638, 639, 641, 643.
Parker, Mrs. Roy, Sr., 722. * {
Parks, national, 54.
Parks, state, 53-54; needs for, 209; see
also National Park, Parkway and Forest i
Development Commission.
Parkway Co., Inc., 562.
Parkway Playhouse, 443.
Parkwood Shopping Center, speech at.
hsted, 511.
Parole, discussion of, 316-317; institute
for board members on, addressed by
Sanford, 311-319; program of, admin-
istered by National Parole Institutes
Program, 312.
Paroles, Board of, 58, 319, 359, 401, 554-
appointments to, 694; appropriations
for, 21; speech to, listed, 512.
Parramore, L. H., 736. ;
Parrish, Anne, 729w.
Parrish, Clyde, 701. %
Parrish, J. Hewes, 710, 711n. *
Parrott, James M., 697^1.
Paschal, Mrs. George W., Jr., 659
Paschal, Herbert R., Jr., 681.
Paschall, J. Ernest, 662. !
Pate, Edwin, 669w. i
Pate, J. W., Jr., 743. T
Pate, Mrs. Larry B., 714
Patton, Clyde P., 54, 54n.
Patton, Mrs. Sadie S., 668.
Paul, D. L., 692.
Paul, Dan M., 666, 682.
Paul, Malcolm C, 655w.
Payne, Harry, 724.
Payroll Savings Plan, 234.
^^If'^Q^g'^y^' 552; reasons for pardoning
Peabody, E. Bruce, Sr., 733.
Peace Corps, 615; day for, designated,
565. '
Peacock, John R., 668.
Peanut Growers Association, 637: speech
to, listed, 495.
Peanuts, meeting on products from, 109;
research in use of, 270.
Pearsall, Robert J., 727%. 4
Pearsall, Thomas J., 742, 745.
Pearson, Lester B., 608.
Peck, William M., Q61n.
1?
I
f
Index
779
Peden Steel Building, speech at dedica-
[ tion of, listed, 514.
I Peek, Harry M., 731.
Peel, Elbert S., Jr., 654, 655n.
Peel, Gilbert, Jr., 714.
Peele, Elwood C, 727n.
Peele, Junie, 740.
Peeler, Egbert N., 59, 59n.
Peeler, Evelyn, 700.
Peerce, Jan, 448, USn, 713.
Pegg, Fred G., 730.
Pembroke State College, speech at Dia-
mond Jubilee of, listed, 514; trustee ap-
pointees for, listed, 720.
Penal system, described, 485-486, see also
prisons.
Pender County Agricultural Fair, speech
at, listed, 495.
Penderlea High School, speech at, listed,
501.
Penland, Philip R., 676.
Penny, Mrs. Catherine D., 706.
Penny, George, participates in news con-
ference, 639-647, passim.
Peppers, production of, 268.
Perrin, Mrs. George, Jr., 698.
Perry, Percival, 684.
Personnel, administration of, 50; act re-
garding, 23; statement on, 544-545.
Personnel Council, State, 50; appointments
to, 694; authorizes salary range revi-
sion, 51.
Peschau, E. F., ISln.
Peter, John Frederick, 441.
c Peters, C. H., 721n.
Peters, R. Brookes, 685n.
Peters, Richard M., 664.
Peters, Robert Brookes, Jr., 708.
! Pfaff and Kendall, 561, 563.
! Pfohl, James C, 444, 444^1, 447, 713; pic-
I tured, facing 448.
^ Pharmacy, Board of, appointments to, 728.
I Pharr, William James, 695.
i Phelps, J. M., 655n.
' Phelps, Mrs. J. M., 654.
• Phi Alpha Delta Convention, speech at,
i listed, 499.
I Phi Delta Kappa Banquet, speech at, list-
i ed, 520.
I Phifer, Edward W., Jr., 658, 714.
,1 Phifer, Jesse P., 726.
Phillips, Charles, 741.
j Phillips, Dickson, 642, 672, 710, llln.
j Phillips, E. L., 706.
\ Phillips, Earl H., 746.
! Phillips, Earl N., 695n, 702.
' Phillips, F. Donald, 655n, 656.
Phillips, Guy B., 673, 744; pictured, fac-
ing, 611.
Phillips, H. Graham, 680.
Philpott, H. Cloyd, 651, 701n; death of,
555; takes oath of office, 3.
Philpott, Hubert, 740.
Phipps, L. J., 654, 655n, 683.
Photographer-of-the-Year Banquet, speech
at, listed, 493.
Physical Therapists, Examining Commit-
tee of, appointments to, 729.
Pickard, Glenn M., 744.
Pickard, M. Glenn, 691.
Pickard, T. Ed, 699.
Pickard, T. Ed, Jr., 708.
Pickens, Marshall I., 688.
Piedmont Air Line, 125.
Piedmont Area Development Association,
speech at, listed, 497.
Piedmont Crescent, 397, 610; appointments
to board of, 747-748; executive com-
mittee of, 465; tour banquet of, ad-
dressed by Sanford, 464-466.
Pierce, Richard, 699n.
Pierce, Van A., 671, 671n.
Pierson, Frank, 699n.
Pierson, W. W., 720.
Pioneer Corn Company, addressed by San-
ford, 457-458.
Pipkin, W. Benton, 677n.
Pisgah National Forest, tract for, pur-
chased, 175.
Pitt Technical Institute, trustee appoint-
ments for, 720.
Pittman, J. Carlton, 655, 655n.
Pittman, R. L., 664, 665n, 733.
Pittman Plaza Shopping Center, speech
at opening of, listed, 493.
Pleasant, Judy, pictured, facing 127.
Plumbing and Heating Contractors, Board
of Examiners of, appointments to, 729-
730.
Poe, Clarence, 110, llOn, 235.
Point system, adjustment to, 78.
Police Executives Association, addressed
by Sanford, 265-266.
Polk, James K., 474.
Pollock, R. F. Hoke, 669n.
Pons, 0. H., 717.
Pool, R. A., 670.
Poole, Brantley, 528.
Poole, J. Hawley, 656.
Pope, Mrs, Arthur F., 717.
Pope, William R., 706.
Population, losses of, by migration, 122,
330; rural, 163, 167.
Porter, Cecil Lee, 699.
Ports, N.C., expansion program of, 132,
564; facilities at, 323; needs for, 209;
support for, 350.
Ports Authority, of Georgia, 564.
t
780
Index
Ports Authority, of N.C., appointments to,
694-695; bonds for, 564; increased busi-
ness of, 55.
Possony, Stefan, 169.
Postmortem Medicolegal Examinations,
Committee on, appointments to, 730.
Poston, Ernest Eugene, 232, 748.
Potter, Clyde R., 667.
Pou, Edwin S., 735^1.
Poultry, processing of, 272.
Poultry Processors Association, speech at,
listed, 514.
Poverty, 341, 486; campaign against, 425-
428; cycle of, 400; discussed, 427; see
also Anti-poverty, War on Poverty.
Powe, E. K., 701n.
Powell, Mrs. Charles, 661.
Powell, H. Emmett, 722, 723^1.
Powell, Rex, 700.
Powell, William S., 683.
Powell Bill, 52.
Powers, Lee L., 710, 722.
Prather, Gibson, 719.
Presbyterian Junior College, commence-
ment address there, 136.
Presidential electors, announced, 528-529.
Presley, Robert I., 693n.
Press, Sanford's relations with the, xxxv.
Press Association, see N.C. Press Asso-
ciation.
Press Newspaper Publishers and Manag-
ing Editors, speech to, listed, 495.
Pressley, Clyde, 706.
Pressly, Mrs. Harriet B., 698.
Prevost, J. Aaron, 713.
Preyer, L. Richardson, 450, 454i?, 655w,
691n; supported by Sanford, 454.
Preyer, Mrs. L. Richardson, 683, 742.
Price, Eugene, 702, 746.
Price, Gwyn B., 47, 47ti, 702.
Price, James L., Jr., 714.
Price, Leontyne, 447, 447^.
Price, Ralph C, 659.
Price, W. R., 737.
Price, Wilkes C, 662.
Price, Woodrow, 55, 55n, 746, 703.
Prince, Mrs. S. R., 683.
Princeton University, speech at, listed,
517.
Principals Conference, addressed by San-
ford, 378-379.
Prismo Safety Corporation, 563.
Prison Commission, appointments to, 695-
696.
Prison Department, 317-318, 359, 401;
appropriations for, 24, 25; budget of,
317; Director of, 555, 696; employee
hours there, 50; improved educational
and rehabilitation services for, 71, 204;
its Guidebook, 113; job placement se;
ices of, 554; personnel of, addressed by
Sanford, 113; plans for reorganization
in, 25; programs of, discussed, 56, 57,
58, 238; special officers for, appoint-
ments to, 696; system's population, re-
duction in, xxxvi; see also Central
Prison.
Prisoners, employment of former, 553-555,
640-641; work release law for, 317-318.
Prisons, mental health clinic at, 317; of-
fer training opportunities, 485; popula-
tion statistics for, 316, 317; see also
Correctional institutions.
Pritchett, Mrs. Earleen, 698.
Pritchett, John A., 673.
Probation Commission, 58, 359, 401; ap'
pointments to, 696; appropriations for,|
21; Director of, 696.
Probation, Parole, and Prison Association,
speech to, listed, 493. j
Proctor, Edward K., 736. i
Proctor, Reba, 706. ^
Proctor, Samuel, 742, 749; speech at in-
auguration of, listed, 492.
Prodigal Sons, addressed by Sanford, 474-
479; speech to, listed, 520.
Progress, discussed, 595-596; pride in that
of N.C, 563.
Project Impact, state-wide extension of,
advocated, 75.
Pruden, C. H., Jr., 710. |
Pryor, Mrs. Edward, 681. j|
Psychiatric Center, Chapel Hill, 590.
Public Administration, American Society
for, speech to, listed, 518.
Public Health Association, speech at, list-
ed, 508.
Public Health Building, dedication of, 327-
328.
Public Health Service (U.S.), on Environ-
mental Health Center, 568.
Public Instruction, Department of, 31, 229,
230, 618, 632-633; activities of, 183;
improvements by, xxvii; programs of,
for mentally retarded, 590 ; quality edu-
cation program of, outlined, 94-98,
passim; support of LINC by, 468; see
also Education, Quality education.
Public safety, appropriations for, 21.
Public Welfare, Department of, 71, 365,
571, 618; appropriations for, 21; Board
of, 554, 617, appointments to, listed, 696-
697; care for medically indigent by, 59;
Commissioner of, 617, 697; discussed,
365; Job Corps functions of, 573; psy-
chological examinations provided by,
363; state programs of, 58.
Public Welfare Programs, Commission to
Index
781
Study, appointments to, 697.
Pullen, Howard, 699.
Purcell, Augustus Buchanan, 698.
Purifoy, Ottis, 668.
Purks, H. Harris, 675n.
Putnam, Elizabeth, 706.
Q
Quality education program, xxi; discussed,
xxi, xxvi-xxviii, 5, 6, 91-102; endorsed
by General Assembly, 138, 151, 176-178,
198-199, 204, 222, 237, 319, 323, 346, 354,
355, 376; praised by Frank P. Graham,
xxxvi; support requested for, 26-33;
see also Education, General Assembly.
Quinn, B. D., 749.
Quinn, Dwight W., 689, 700.
R
Race relations, xxxiii-xxxv, xxxvi, 133,
277-278, 332, 333, 334-338, 452, 627;
statement to Negro leaders regarding,
597-599; see also Civil Rights, Good
Neighbor Council, Negroes.
Radio, addresses broadcast by, 121, 201-
211, 242-250, 479-487; systems of, op-
erating in N.C., 287; see also "Conel-
rad."
Radio and Television Awards Luncheon,
speech at, listed, 511.
Ragan, J. E., Jr., 732.
Ragan, Sam, 712, 740, 742.
Ragland, Mrs. Trent, 682.
Ragland, Trent, Jr., 733.
Ragsdale, Hugh, 668, 702.
Railroads, 132, see also names of indi-
vidual railroads.
Raleigh Production Credit Association,
109.
Ramsay, John E., 725n.
Ramsey, Annie S., 709.
Ramsey, Claude, Jr., 713.
Ramsey, Kenneth W., 729n.
Randall, C. B., 733n. >v
Randall, C. C, 528.
Randall, George W., 634, 686, 696/
Randall, John T., 654.
Randolph, Louis T., 718.
Randolph Industrial Education Center,
speech at, listed, 513.
Rankin, Edward L., Jr., 708.
Rankin, John W., 690.
Rankin, William R., 712.
Ransdell, N. F., 694, 695n.
Rash, Lloyd M., 714.
Ranch, Marshall A., 743.
Rawlins, George S., 727.
Ray, Hector, 726, 121n.
Ready, 1. E., 699n.
Real Estate Licensing Board, appoint-
ments to, 730.
Realtors, Association of, addressed by
Sanford, 373-377.
Reapportionment and redistricting, of the
House and Senate, xxxvi, 43, 87, 88,
141, 351, 606; special session on, called
for, 527.
Recreation Commission, 52, 53, 62, 632;
appointments to, 698, for Advisory
Committee of, 698-699; Director of, 535;
report of, 582-583.
Red Cross, 384; speech to meeting of,
listed, 516.
Redfarm, David Townley, 678.
Reece, John C, 691.
Reed, C. Wingate, 681.
Reed, Robert, 700.
Reed, W. C, 697. -
Rees, Sam, 700.
Reese, Addison H., 716.
Reeves, Charles M., Jr., 663n, 674, 675n.
Reeves, John Mercer, 694.
Reeves, Robert J., 660.
Refrigeration Examiners, Board of, ap-
pointments to, 730.
Regional Planning Commission, Western
N.C., 137, 191; addressed by Sanford,
433.
Register of Deeds Association, speech to,
listed, 504.
Reibel, Velma H., 726.
Reitzel, John L., 731.
Reorganization of State Government,
Commission on, 57; appointments to.
700.
Republican Party, 200, 214, 280; Execu-
tive Committee of, 642.
Resch, E. A., 747.
Research Triangle, 35, 53, 134, 187, 323,
401, 568, 592, 611; importance of, 613-
614; Learning Institute at, 487; reasons
for locating Environmental Health Cen-
ter in, 327, 328, 568-570; space center
for, 349; speech at, listed, 497.
Research Triangle Institute, 323, 593, 614.
Research Triangle Regional Planning
Commission, appointments to, 700.
Reserve Militia, N.C., staff officer appoint-
ments to, 700-701.
Resource-Use Education Conference, ad-
dressed by Sanford, 193-194.
Retarded Children, 41, 389-390, 486; N.C.
Association for, addressed by Sanford,
380; see also Mental retardation.
Revenue, Department of, 17.
Revenue Act, Senate and House com-
782
Index
mended on passage of, 547-548.
Reynolds, Charles H., 675??.
Reynolds, John, 713.
Reynolds, John M., 673.
Reynolds, Mrs. Rufus W., 691.
Reynolds-Babcock Foundation, 420.
Reynolds (Z. Smith) Foundation, 392.
Reynolds tobacco industry, 124, 268;
speech at Whitaker Park Plant of, list-
ed, 496.
Rhodes, Gordon E., 724.
Rhodes, John S., 690.
Rhyne, Clyde, 675.
Rhyne, Miles Hoffman, 65Sn.
Ribicoff, Abraham, 568.
Rice, Robert B., 727.
Richards, E. N., 694, 712.
Richardson, James J., 688.
Richardson, James P., 689.
Richardson, R. P., 690.
Richardson, Smith, Sr., 733.
Richardson Foundation, 444.
Richbourg, Mrs. Sarah Hamilton, 706.
Richmond County Technical Institute,
trustee appointments for, 721.
Rick, W. M., 6S9n.
Rickover, Hyman, 477; introduction of,
listed, 492; quoted, 32-33, 152.
Riddle, Harry Lee, Jr., 654.
Ridenhour, Baxter, 379, 719n.
Ridgeway, H. L., Jr., 728.
Rivenbark, R. R., 732, 733.
Rivers, Robert C, 673.
Roanoke-Chowan Authors, Artists, and
Musicians, speech to, listed, 505.
Robbins, G. C, Jr., 670.
Robbins, Marvin, 708.
Roberson, Paul D., 654.
Roberts, Ben R., 663n.
Roberts, C. Paul, 709.
Roberts, C. W., 689m
Roberts, John, 736.
Roberts, William, 268, 268n.
Robertson, Glenn M., 722.
Robeson County Schoolmasters Club,
speech to, listed, 492.
Robinson, H. B., 660.
Robinson, H. S., 716.
Robinson, J. D., 728.
Robinson, John D., Jr., 528.
Robinson, L. H., 716.
Robinson, Leonard H., 698.
Rockingham Community College, trustee
appointments for, 721.
Rodenbough, Mrs. Grace T., 176, 185,
185n, 664.
Rodman, William B., Jr., 669n.
Rogers, Eric Winfred, 669.
Rogers, J. H., 729.
Rogers, Jack H., 66Sn. K
Rollins, Steed, 672. S
Romeo, B. J., 661n. S|
Rondthaler, Theodore, 664. B'
Roney, Ben E., 124, 124n, 680. P'
Rooker, J. E., Jr., 721n.
Roosevelt, Franklin D., 104, 275, 432; New
Deal of, 236, 425.
Roosevelt, Theodore, 376; quoted, 595-596.
Rose, Alvin S., 701. ^|
Rose, Charles G., Jr., 717. m
Rose, D. J., 661. M
Rose, David J., 701^1. M
Rose, Lawrence C, 737. "m
Rose, Melvin Jack, 658. m
Rosemond, S. R., 718, 119n. M
Rosenblatt, Milton, 414. 'm
Rosenthal, Emil, 718. f
Rosevear, Mrs. W. B., 682.
Rosman Satellite Tracking . . . Facility, j
addressed by Sanford, 377. jk
Ross, Ernest W., 705n, 743. 1
Ross, Frank Howard, Jr., 695. 1
Ross, George R., 702. 1
Ross, J. H., 71771. ll
Ross, Mrs. Leola Myrick, 714. W\
Ross, Malcolm, 563. '
Rotary Clubs, addressed by Sanford, 404; ■
speeches to, listed, 517, 520; sponsors i
authors' luncheon, 126.
Roth, Andrew, 662.
Roughedge Farmers Club, speech to, list-
ed, 511.
Rourk, Mrs. M. H., 716.
Rowan Technical Institute, trustee ap-
pointments for, 721.
Rowe, Crayton E., 676.
Rowe, Oliver R., 687, 716. |
Royster, David W., Sr., 684.
Royster, Fred S., 692, 693?i, 694.
Rucker, Walter, 733.
Rudel, Julius, 445, 445n, 447, 713.
Rudisill, Gerald Alton, 715.
Ruffin, William H., 676.
Rumley, Mrs. William, Jr., 682.
Rumple, Jay Charles, 686.
Runkle, Benjamin G., 676.
Rural Electrification Authority, 403; ap-
pointments to, 702; expansion program
of, 47.
Rural Rehabilitation Corporation, assists i
with food processing program, 473-474;
director appointments to, 702.
Rural Safety Council, speech to, listed,
518.
Ruritan National Convention, speech to,
listed, 491.
Russ, M. H., 734.
Rutherford County Community College,
Index
783
trustee appointments for, 722.
Rutledge, J. Carlyle, 741.
S
Safety Engineering Committee, studies
traffic measures, 213.
St. Andrews College, 136; speech at in-
augural ceremonies, listed, 503.
Salem, Old, 441, 445.
Salem College, 41.
Sales Executives Club, 320.
Sales tax, see Taxes.
Saline Water Conversion Research and
Development Test Station, 55.
Salisbury, F. C, 668, 684.
Salley, William Moss, Jr., 729n.
Salt Marsh Mosquito Advisory Commis-
sion, appointments to, 702.
Samarcand Manor, counselors there ad-
dressed by Sanford, 402.
San Francisco, "Richmond Project" team-
teaching, 392.
Sanatarian Examiners, appointments to,
730.
Sanatorium system, 45; funds for, 20.
Sandburg, Carl, 223, 444; day honoring,
designated, 572.
Sanders, Mrs. John L., 709.
Sanders, S. W., Jr., 663n.
Sanders, W. Boman, 687n.
Sandford, Bob C, 730.
Sandhills Community College, dedicated,
471-472 ; trustee appointments for, 722.
Sands, Royal, 706.
Sanford, Betsy, xxxvi; pictured, facing 7.
Sanford, Cecil L., xxii; pictured, facing
126.
Sanford, Mrs. Cecil L., xxii, 722; pictured,
facing 126.
Sanford, Margaret Rose (Mrs. Terry),
xxi, xxii, 718; pictured, facing 6, 7, 119,
574.
Sanford, Terry, activities of, 610-611; bi-
ographical sketch of, xxi-xxxvii; pic-
tured, frontispiece, facing 6, 7, 64, 65,
118, 119, 127, 172, 324, 325, 378, 379,
404, 405, 428, 429, 448, 449, 486, 574,
575, 600, 601, 610, 611, 626, 627; serves
LINC board, 744; serves N.C. Fund
directors, 745; statement concerning
nomination for Vice-President, 628.
Sanford, Terry, Jr., xxxvi; pictured facing
7, 404.
Sanford Progress Days, speech at, listed,
492.
Sanitarian Examiners, appointments to,
730.
Sarratt, Reed, 669n.
Satterfield, Mrs. Peggy Warren, 692, 694.
Satterfield, Robert, 732.
Saunders, William P., 584, 584n, 671n.
Saunooke, Osley, pictured, facing 574.
Savings Bonds, meeting on, addressed by
Sanford, 234; speech at, listed, 493.
Sawyer, James C, Sr., 718, 719??.
Sawyer, R. D., Jr., 702.
Sawyer, Richard W., Jr., 659n.
Schaub, Ira 0., 702, lOSn.
Scheldt, Edward, 639, 692.
SchiefFelin and Co., speech at dedication
of, listed, 521.
Schiele, R. M., 694.
Schiffman, Arnold A., 692.
School, program on importance of return-
ing to, addressed by Sanford, 602-603.
School Administrators, South Atlantic
group, speech to, listed, 518.
School boards, membership of, 182-183;
selection of, 44.
School Boards' Association, 192, 462; dis-
trict meeting of, speech at, listed, 491.
School construction, cost of, 437; discussed,
460-463.
School for the Performing Arts, xxix; Ad-
visory Committee of, listed, 447-448,
appointments to Advisory Board of, 712-
713; authorized by legislature, 388; de-
scribed, 446-448; location of, selected,
618-619; opening of, 446-448; purpose
of, 478; trustee appointments for, 712;
works with talented students, 486.
Schools, parochial, 157, 368; public, 359,
360, consolidation of, 650, improvements
for, 576-578; see also Education.
Schreiber, Daniel, pictured, facing 486.
Schwartz, B. D., 724.
Science and Technology, Board of, 377,
401; appointments to, 703-704; establish-
ment of, xxxvi, 483, 592.
Scientific Advisory Committee, 593-594;
formed, 591 ; guidance of, in science, 35.
Scott, Alan F., 721.
Scott, Mrs. Anne, 748.
Scott, E. L., 732.
Scott, George A., 747.
Scott, Grady, 657n.
Scott, Henry A., 710, llln.
Scott, Milton v., 702.
Scott, Ralph H., 67, 61n, 656, 684, 691,
704.
Scott, Robert W., 285, 635, 670, 611n, 686.
Scott, W. Kerr, 5, 5n, 7, 108, 110, 378,
455, 584; appoints Negro to board, 335;
as agricultural leader, 285; called
"Great Agrarian," 5; campaign of, 453;
his relationship with Sanford, xxiii;
quoted, 581; road and road bond pro-
784
Index
grams of, 37, 73, 83, 96, 217, 219, 275,
348, 432, 461, 482; school bond program
of, 461; works on World Food Bank,
112, 167.
Scott, Mrs. W. Kerr, 678, 679ti, 684.
Scott Reservoir, purpose of, 54.
Seabrook, James Ward, 677.
Seafood, processing of, 270-271.
Seagraves, W. P., 726.
Seagroves, Mrs. Jessie Ruth, 668.
Sealy, J. Frank, 730.
Seamon, Tony, 746.
Sears, Hubert C, lOln.
Sears, J. R., 696.
Seashore Commission, appointments to,
702-703.
Seawell, Malcolm E., xxiv, 7SSn; concern-
ing his appointment, 641.
Seed, Allen H., Jr., speech of introduction
of, listed, 498.
Seedmen's Association, speech at, listed,
505.
Seippel, Mrs. Alvin, 668.
Selective Service, 145; rejections by, 437.
Selig Manufacturing Co., speech at open-
ing of, listed, 493.
Sellers, Robert C, 739n.
Semans, James, 676, 712.
Semans, Mrs. James H., 659.
Senate, N.C., appointments to, 653;
monetary committees of, 67, 186; re-
apportionment of, 43; see also General
Assembly, Reapportionment and re-
districting.
Sermon, R. R., 728, 729n.
Seymour-Johnson Air Base, 177.
Shaffer, S. W., 726.
Shands, Harley C, 697n.
Sharp, Susie, 176, 185, 185n, 654, 655n.
Shavlik, Ronnie, 676.
Shaw, Eugene G., 654, 688, 689n.
Shaw, Flake, 110, llOn.
Shaw, W. W., 427, 427n.
Shaw, Willie A., 671.
Shaw University, addressed by Sanford,
307.
Shaw Woods, 605.
Shawcroft, Brian, 665, 679.
Sherrill, Frank Odell, 666.
Sherrill, 0. L., 716.
Shoaf, Wayne, 712, 747.
Shope, W. W., 697.
Shriver, Sargent, speech of introduction
of, listed, 504.
Shuford, Forrest II, 660, 685.
Shuford, M. I., 660.
Shuford, William B., 722.
Shuford, William Melvin, 694, 695n.
Shuping, W. E., Jr., 662.
Sieker, Herbert 0., 676. ^
Siewart, Floyd T., 698.
Siler City Recorder's Court, appointment^
to, 738. J
Simmons, J. S., 664. ■
Simmons, Thomas L., 720, 721n. 9
Simmons, W. L., 735n. |
Simmons, Walter Eugene, 670, 671n, 687w.
Simpson, Alfred Dexter, 396; identified,
381n; lecture series, given by Sanford,
380-396.
Simpson, George L., 701n. .
Sinclair, E. G., 739%. I
Singletary, E. G., 726. ^
Singleton, James Abraham, 670.
Singleton, Mary Clyde, 729.
Sir Walter Cabinet, speech to, listed, 512.
Sitterson, J. Carlyle, pictured, facing 172.
Slagle, A. B., 656.
Sloan, Robert, 693.
Sloane, Joseph, 709.
Smart, Solon, 713.
Smathers, Mrs. Marie, 664.
Smith, Mrs. A. 0., 746.
Smith, Billy B., 730.
Smith, Budd E., 741.
Smith, Carl Stanley, 724.
Smith, Clyde F., 730.
Smith, Eugene, 728.
Smith, Harvey, 746.
Smith, Henry B., 734.
Smith, Jim, 724.
Smith, John, Jr., 66Sn.
Smith, Kenneth Royster, 730.
Smith, Mrs. MaBelle, 684.
Smith, Mack G., 734.
Smith, Mrs. Mary Ward, 684.
Smith, Miles J., 669n.
Smith, Orren Randolph, 119.
Smith, Mrs. Oscar, 681ri.
Smith, Ray, 698, 699ii.
Smith, Robert M., 676.
Smith, S. Linton, 715n.
Smith, Sheldon P., 661%, 704, 716.
Smith, Vinson A., 728.
Smith, Wayne, 658.
Smith, William Carter, 697%.
Smith, William E., 700.
Smytte, Henry B., 735, 735%.
Snepp, Frank W., 701%.
Snider, Mrs. Arnold H., Jr., 721.
Snider, William D., 661.
Snotherly, Joseph E., 726.
Snow, A. C, 699.
Snow, Wiley W., 735.
Snyder, J. Eugene, 672.
Social Security, 22, 214.
Social Service, Conference for, addressed
by Sanford, 235-238.
Index
785
Society of American Archivists, addressed
by Sanford, 365-366.
Sockwell, George, 710.
Soil Conservation, Anson and Union coun-
ties, 266.
Sojourner and Molly Sinclair, The, 445.
Sommer, Sebastian C, 703, 746.
Sossamon, LeRoy, 700.
South Carolina Education Week Confer-
ence, addressed by Sanford, 150-158.
Southeastern Baptist Theological Semi-
nary, speech at, listed, 515.
Southeastern Child Care Association,
speech at, listed, 518.
Southeastern Interstate Forest Fire Pro-
tection Compact, committee appoint-
ments to, 704.
Southeastern Regional Conference, Amer-
ican Public Welfare Association, ad-
dressed by Sanford, 365.
Southerland, John W., 729n.
Southern, Mildred, 699^1.
Southern Albemarle Convention, addressed
by Sanford, 307-308.
Southern Aluminum and Steel Corpora-
tion, 563.
Southern Association of Colleges and
Secondary Schools, xxxiv, 167; Com-
mission on Secondary Schools of, ad-
dressed by Sanford, 301-307.
Southern Association of State Planning
and Development Agencies, addressed
by Sanford, 463.
Southern Furniture Exposition Building,
speech at, listed, 496.
Southern Governors, their Commitment to
Health goals, 397.
Southern Governors Conference, 187, 250;
panel of, addressed by Sanford, 279-
280.
Southern Municipal and Industrial Waste
Conference, speech at, listed, 503.
Southern Regional Council for Education,
appointments to Board of Control for,
674.
Southern Regional Education Board, 301,
343-344, 366, 381, 612; addressed by
Sanford, 250-251, 278-279, 352; ''Com-
mitment to Health" of, 364; elects San-
ford chairman, xxviii; "Goals Report"
of, 300; legislative work conference of,
274; speeches at, listed, 498, 515.
Southern States Probation, Parole, and
Prison Association, speech at, listed,
493.
Southern Trust Conference, 514.
Space, N.C.'s part in age of, 591-594;
state's educational contributions to tech-
nology of, 46.
Spaulding, Asa T., 748.
Spears, John W., 663w.
Spears, Marshall T., 720.
Speech and Hearing Handicapped Pro-
gram, 389.
Speight, Francis, 740.
Spence, James, 702.
Spencer, Cornelia Phillips, 176, 185.
Spencer, Mrs. Stella, 692.
Spilman, J. B., 657.
Spiro, Robert H., Jr., 666.
Sprouse, J. M., 216.
Spruill, C. Wayland, 684, 685^1.
Spruill, E. R., ISln.
Sprunt, J. Lawrence, 666.
Sprunt, Kenneth M., 737.
"Sputnik," changes in education due to,
438.
Squires, Irvin R., 725, 734. ^_ -
Staats, Elmer, 568.
Stacy, Horace E., Jr., 677, 740.
Stafford, 0. F., 678, 750.
Stallings, Robert L., Jr., 39, S9n, 449, 575,
670, 707, lOln.
Stamey, Nancy, 699n.
Stamper, Everett H., 729n.
Standardization Committee, appointments
to, 704.
Stanford, C. W., Jr., 683.
Stanford, William R., 689.
Stanley Power Tools Plant, dedication
speech at, 449-450.
State Aid to Public Libraries Fund, 56.
State agencies, see various department
names, listed under primary word in
name.
State Bureau of Investigation, 17; asked
to investigate KKK, 624; investigates
Elsie Webb matter, 603; reports on
highway relocation, 604-606.
State Capitol Planning Commission, ap-
pointments to, 664-665.
State Civil Rights Committee, report of,
639.
State-County Relations, 258.
State Employees Association, addressed bv
Sanford, 356.
State Fair, opening ceremonies addressed
by Sanford, 189-190.
State Government, Commission on Reor-
ganization of, appointments to, 700.
State Guard, establishment of, suggested,
62.
"State of the State" message, 34.
State personnel, statement regarding, 544-
545; salary increases for certain classes
of, 23.
786 Index
State Sovereignty, appointments to com-
mission studying, 704.
State-wide Planning Meeting on School
Construction, addressed by Sanford,
460-463.
Staton, Marshall, 658.
Status of Women, appointments to com-
mission on, 748; establishment of com-
mission on, 536-538.
Stay-in-School Committee, 178-179, 237;
appointments to, 748-749.
Stedman, John P., 663n.
Steed, Mrs. Davetta, 700.
Stein, Mrs. Harry B., 674, 742.
Stein, J. Bernard, 669.
Stem, Jesse J., Jr., 686.
Stem, Thad, Jr., 688.
Stenhouse, James A., 663, 681, 684.
Stephens, George, Jr., 632, 665, 680, 746.
Stephenson, Gilbert, 661, 665n.
Stephenson, H. L., lOln.
Stephenson, S. S., 725n.
Stevens, George M., 667??.
Stevens, Grady, 704.
Stevens, Hamilton Wright, Jr., 730.
Stevens, Henry L., Jr., 656.
Stevens, Mrs. Henry L., Jr., 717.
Stevens, S. Vernon, Jr., 710.
Stevenson, Adlai, xxv, 455.
Stewart, J. S., 743.
Stewart, John S., 711.
Stewart, Pearson, 699.
Stewart, Pearson H., 665, 679.
Stewart, S. I., llln.
Stick, David, 666.
Stikeleather, James G., Jr., 67, 67n, 669n,
742.
Stiles, Herbert G., 732.
Stoker, C. C, 6Sln.
Stokes, Raymond H., 701.
Stokes, Thomas D., 696.
Stone, Edward Durrell, designs Legisla-
tive Building, 470.
Stone, Joseph, 701.
Stoner, Mrs. Ruth, 744.
Stoney, Mrs. A. B., 684.
Stoney, George C, 742.
Story, E. Jack, 660, 661n.
Stratford, Mrs. R. E., 691n.
Stream Sanitation Committee, appoint-
ments to, 704-705.
Strickland, J. F., QS5n.
Strickland, Paul G., 736, 737n.
Strom, H. G., 69Sn.
Stronsnider, Charles F., 671n.
Strother, J. P., 666, 743.
Stroud, Martha, 661.
Stroupe, Henry S., 669%.
Structural Pest Control Commission, ap-
pointments to, 730-731.
Studdert, William W., 681. ,
Student Activities Banquet, addressed by 1
Sanford, 428-429.
Student Legislature, speech to, listed, 500. j
Student NEA Notables Dinner, addressed! J
by Sanford, 454-455. j ;
Students, average, discussed, 395; retard-j ,
ed, training for, 204; talented, 386-388, j ,
477, Governor's School for, hears San- ,
ford, 339, provisions for, 41, 204, 358; j
"underachiever," studies of, 478; see\
also Exceptional Children.
Suddarth, Thomas H., 7S9n. ^
Suggs, Mrs. T. Frank, 698. S
Suiter, W. G., 722, 723ti. ft
Sullivan, Kirby, 714. S
Sullivan, W. H., Jr., 729ti. %
Sunset Beach, appointments for, 736.
Superintendents, Principals, and Directoxsi
of Instruction, speech to, listed, 496.
Superintendents Conference, addressed byi^
Sanford, 166-167. i
Superior Court, judges of, appointments^
listed, 654-656; solicitors for, appoint-i
ments listed, 656, conference of, con-!!
cerning traffic safety, speech listed, 496,1
to indict Klan violators, 624.
Supreme Court, N.C., appointments toA
654.
Supreme Court, U.S., desegregation deci-|j
sion of, 133, 476; prayer decision of A
252, 596-597. ■
Surf City, appointments for, 736.
Surry County Community College, trusteed
appointments for, 722.
Sutton, Mrs. Louis V., 705.
Swain, John P., 687n,
Swainson, John B., speech introducing, i
listed, 494.
Swalin, Benjamin, 49, 49n; comments on i
budget and concerts, 444. ^
Swalin, Mrs. Benjamin, 740. i
Swan, Hugh G., 732.
Swannanoa, Evaluation Center there, 205.
Swannsborough, Historic Commission, ap-
pointments for, 684. I
Swaringen, Oliver A., 692.
Swindell, Annie H., 707n.
Swindell, Joe G., 746.
Swindell, John Harold, 746.
Swindell, Sebastian C, 703.
Symonds, 0. Ray, 719n.
Symphony, American Orchestra League,
addressed by Sanford, 440-449.
Symphony, N.C., xxxv, 48, 324, 444, 611.
Symphony Society, N.C., 445; trustee ap-
pointments for, 705.
Index
787
T
Tally, Mrs. J. O., Jr., 666, 684.
Talton, Hardy, 722.
Tankard, Mrs. John A., 681, 681n.
Tankard, Mrs. Roscoe, 682.
Tanner, Hal H., 723.
Tarry, William B., 686.
Tate, Charles A., 735.
Tate, E. Murray, Jr., 680.
Tate, Earl H., 675, 688, 6S9n.
Tate, John A., Jr., 677.
Tate, Samuel McD., 717.
Taxes, 28-30, 214, 567; for educational im-
provements, xxiv, xxvi-xxvii, 33, 134;
on food, 26, 117-118, 120, 121, 140, 195,
200, 204-205, 477; on gasoline, 30, 73;
on income, 69; reduction of, 11.
Taylor, Burke H., 675.
Taylor, H. Patrick, Jr., 642-643, 665, 665n,
672, 679, 6Sln, lOln, 740.
Taylor, Issac M., 690.
Taylor, James T., xxxv, 579, 741, 743.
Taylor, Lacy, 701.
Taylor, Robert N., 737.
Taylor, Mrs. W. Frank, 659.
Teachers, 157, 180-181, 197-198; educa-
tion of, 153; forty-hour week for, 645-
647; of special education, 389; salary
increases for, xxvii, 18, 115, 370; sick
leave for, 100.
Teachers' and State Employees' Retire-
ment System, 22; trustee appointments
for, 706.
Teachers Appreciation Night, speech for,
listed, 516.
Teachers Institute, addressed by Sanford,
367-368.
Teachers Retirement, Southern Confer-
ence on, speech at, listed, 518.
Teague, Claude E., 714, 715n.
Teague, Mrs. Earl, 665, 668, 680.
Teague, Woodrow, 734.
Technical Institute of Alamance, appoint-
ments to, 711.
Teen-Dems, speeches to, listed, 498, 504.
Teer, Nello L., 660.
Television, addresses broadcast on, 121,
202-211, 222-231, 242-250, 266-273, 285-
291, 450-454, 479-487; "Dixie Dynamo"
series on, 267; educational, 138, 346,
466; see also Educational Television,
Commission on.
Television and Radio Broadcasters, Asso-
ciation of, addressed by Sanford, 344-
351.
Temple Emanuel Brotherhood Meeting,
addressed by Sanford, 221.
Terrill, William A., 725, 725?i.
Textbook Commission, appointments to,
706.
Textile Chemists and Colorists, American
Association of, speech to, listed, 518.
Textile industry, employment in, 187, 203 ;
taxes paid by, 215; see also Carolina
Textiles, Inc.
Textile Manufacturers' Association, N.C.,
addressed by Sanford, 187.
Textile Workers Association, 647.
Textile Workers of America, 552.
Textured Fibres, Inc., speech at, listed,
521.
Thanksgiving Day, proclamation concern-
ing, 526.
Thayer, Lloyd Y., lOln, 749.
Theater, 441; see also Drama.
Thirtieth Infantry Division Review,
speech at, listed, 494.
Thomas, Mrs. A. W., Jr., 716.
Thomas, Frank, 668. ^ •
Thomas, J. 0., 675.
Thomas, J. Oscar, 109n.
Thomas, Marie, 682.
Thomas, R. Gordon, 663n.
Thomas, Stephen B., 711.
Thomasville Recorder's Court, appoint-
ments to, 738.
Thompson, E. C, 708.
Thompson, Elizabeth, 681.
Thompson, H. Ralston, 685.
Thompson, Horace K., 127n.
Thompson, J. C, l^ln.
Thompson, Jerry G., 670.
Thompson, M. H., 720.
Thompson, Mary B., 706.
Thompson, Paul H., 662, 670, 671n.
Thompson, W. Avery, 703n.
Thompson, W. E., 747.
Thornburg, Lacy H., 704, 748.
Thoroughfare Planning Law, 603.
Thorp, I. D., 685n.
Thorp, William L., 685, 690.
Thurston, Thelma, 744.
Thurston, Thomas G., 690.
Tillery, L. Bradford, 724.
Tillett, Mrs. Charles W., 675n.
Tillett, Mrs. Estelle Burrus, 703, 746.
Tillett, Mrs. Gladys A., 748.
Tillinghast, Anne W., 699n.
Tillman, Otis E., 711.
Tobacco, 164; economic importance of,
406-407; effect of, on health, 413-416,
440; export of, 309-311; Surgeon Gen-
eral's report on, discussed, 407-417 ;
testimony concerning, 405 ; see also To-
bacco quota.
Tobacco, Agriculture Subcommittee of the
788
Index
House of Representatives, speech be-
fore, listed, 517.
Tobacco, Bright Leaf Tobacco States Con-
ference, 309-311.
Tobacco Associates, 637.
Tobacco Distributers, National Associa-
tion of, addressed by Sanford, 406-417.
Tobacco Industry Research Committee,
405.
Tobacco quota, referendum on, 636-637.
Tomlinson, Mrs. C. Gordon, 688.
Tomlinson, Eugene B., Jr., 724.
Tourism. 37, 82, 324, 398, 574; promotion
of, 404-405, 632-633.
Townsend, David, Jr., 656.
Townsend, David, Sr., 656, 65171.
Townsend, H. D., 725?2.
Townsend, J. R., 634.
Townsend, James R., 716.
Trade Fair Luncheon, speech at, listed,
505.
Trade Fairs, xxx, 11, 190, 215, 253, 329,
555; purpose of, 546-547; scene at, pic-
tured, facing 575; success of, 206.
Traffic and Street Sign Company, 561,
563.
Traffic Club, speech to, listed, 500.
Traffic Code Commission, appointments to,
706.
Traffic Safety, Committee for, 213, 240,
249, 349; members of, 76; role of, 77.
Traffic Safety, discussed, 75-80, 239-240,
242-250, see also Breatholizer test.
Traffic Safety Council, N.C., 49, 76, 206,
249; appointments to, 749-750; direc-
tors of, 231; meetings of, 213.
Traffic Safety Management Conference,
speech at, listed, 510.
Traffic Safety Meeting, speech at, listed,
511.
Traffic Session, National Safety Congress,
speech at, listed, 510.
Training Center on Delinquency and Youth
Crime, 312.
Transportation, in N.C., 132.
Trask, Raiford, 724.
Travel Council, N.C., addressed by San-
ford, 404-405; Southern Regional, speech
to, listed, 502.
Travel Information Conferences, address-
ed by Sanford, 466-467.
Treigle, Norman, 445.
Trentman, W. Harold, 747.
Trigg, Harold L., 692, 744; pictured, fac-
ing 611.
Tripp, Mrs. W. Arthur, 678, 718.
Trotter, B. C, Qlln.
Trotter, B. C, Jr., 721ti.
Trowbridge, Mrs. K. S., 682.
Trucking industry, 323-324.
Truitt, R. W., 704.
Truman, Harry S., 104, 455.
Tryon Palace, 445; Commission for, ap-
pointments to, 707.
Tuberculosis, Advisory Committee on, 46. '
Tuberculosis, N.C. Sanatoriums for the
Treatment of, trustee appointments for,
722.
Tucker, Glenn M., 668, 669, 710. m
Turlington, W. H., 688. |
Turner, Frank B., 652. ^
Turnpike Authority, N.C, appointments
to, 707.
Twisdale, Willim L., 686.
Tyler, Mrs. James M., 707.
Tyson, Mrs. Bert G., 676.
U
U.S. Constitution, Bill of Rights of, 475.
U.S.S. "North Carolina," memorial dedi-
cation of, 234; pictured, facing, 173;
transferred from Navy to state, 173;
Veterans Day ceremony at, addressed
by Sanford, 291.
U.S.S. "North Carolina" Battleship Com-
mission, appointments to, 708.
Umstead, Frank Graham, 690.
Umstead, John W., Jr., xxix, 48, 48ti, 209,
655n, 690, 691^1 ; dinner honoring, 233;
his work in mental health, 276; resig-
nation of, 11.
Umstead, William Bradley, 4, in, 316, 336,
455; his interest in interstate highway
system, 275; supports bonds for schools
and mental hospitals, 461.
Umstead, Mrs. William Bradley, 119n.
Underwood, E. M., Jr., 735, 735n.
Underwriters Insurance Co., 562.
Union Metal Manufacturing Co., 563.
United Fund Regional Meeting, speech
at, listed, 502.
United Nations, 103-106, 171, 172, 196,
291, 337; speech at workshop on, listed,
516.
University of Massachusetts, speech at,
listed, 517.
University of North Carolina, alumnae of
Greensboro branch, addressed by San-
ford, 135-136; alumni of Atlanta, ad-
dressed by Sanford, 239 ; alumni of New
York, speech to, listed, 510; alumni of
New York banquet honoring F. P.
Graham, speech at, listed, 498; alumni
of Tidewater area, addressed by San-
ford, 173-174; appropriations for, 19,
20, 22; as member of Association of
American Universities, 174; assists re-
search on learning, 487; commencement
Index
789
addresses at, made by Sanford, 338-339,
434, listed, 504; consolidation of, xxix,
in 1930's, 136, described, 428; Faculty
Club of, addressed by Sanford, 308-309;
Greensboro branch of, commencement
speech at, listed, 514; increased enroll-
ment at, 239; plans for, discussed, 299-
300; Press of, issues John White vol-
umes, 441; provision for, in early Con-
stitution, 83; Psychology Department at,
362; quality education program, out-
lined at, xxi; recruitment problems at,
239; Sanford's career at, xxi-xxii;
School of Nursing at, addressed by San-
ford, 193; School of Public Health at,
327-328; speech at, 91-102; three cam-
puses of, 394; see also N.C. State Col-
lege, Institute of Government.
Unto These Hills, 443.
Upchurch, T. B., Jr., 705n.
Upchurch, William O., 399n.
Utilities, laws regarding, 349; services of,
47.
Utilities Commission, 47, 422; appoint-
ments to, 708.
Uzzell, George R., 691ti, 701n, 706.
V
Vail, Edith, 729n.
Vance, Rupert B., 263, 263u.
Vance-Aycock Dinner, speech of introduc-
tion at, listed, 509.
Van Every, Stephen H., 677.
Van Gorder, Charles O., 723.
Van Hecke, Maurice T., 677, 677n.
Van Landingham, R. F., 668.
Vann, J. N., 105n.
"Variety Vacationland," 53, 138.
Vaughan, L. L., 731n.
Vaughn, Earl W., 721.
Vennel, Woodrow W., 735.
Venters, Carl V., 679u.
Venters, Mrs. Claude E., 681.
Vereen, Johnie W., 735, 735n.
Vernon, Clinton D., 696, 697w.
Vestal, J. M., 717.
Veterans Commission, appointments to,
708; gives assistance, 60.
Veterans Day, 468.
Veterans of Foreign Wars, speech to,
listed, 514.
Veterinary Medical Board, appointments
to, 731-732.
Vick, Herbert W., 719.
Vickers, John H., 712.
Viet Nam, 628; death of officers there,
566-567.
Virginia Electric and Power Co., speech
at, listed, 515.
Virginia Public Relations Conference,
speech at, listed, 502.
Vocational Agriculture, conference of
teachers of, 146.
Vocational and Industrial Education, see
Education, Vocational.
Vocational rehabilitation program, 361,
589.
Vocational Textile School, trustee appoint-
ments for, 722-723.
Vocational training program, 315, 613.
■ W
Waddell, Charles, 589, 5S9n, 691.
Waddell, Elbert Edwin, 710.
Wade, Charles, 693n.
Wade, Charles Byrd, Jr., 670.
Wade, J. E. L., 694.
Wadesboro Merchants Association, speech
to, listed, 496.
Wadford, A. F., 696.
Waggoner, Jay, 710.
Wagoner, W. H., 740.
Wald Industries, 561, 563.
Waldrop, Herbert, 719n.
Wales, Charles P., 746.
Walker, Currie Edwin, 663.
Walker, D. J., 711.
Walker, Hal Hammer, 654.
Wall Street Journal, quoted, 414.
Wallace, Earle, 700.
Wallace, Eleanor Register, 727n.
Wallace, James C, 702, 748.
Wallace, Joseph Paul, 584, 584w.
Wallace, Tracy R., 670.
Wallace, Wesley, 741.
Waller, Forrest, 715n.
Wallin, William C, 662.
Walser, Richard, 661, 683.
Walsh, Maurice E., 720.
Walsh, Modeal, 723.
Walters, Mrs. Adelaide, 704, 747.
Walters, Charles S., 734.
Walton, Mrs. L. Graham, 660.
War on Poverty, 486; address by Sanford
on, 420-421.
Ward, A. D., 733.
Ward, A. H., 737ti.
Ward, Bennie Brooks, 690.
Ward, Hiram H., 674.
Ward, Thomas H., Jr., 676.
Warlick, Paul W., 693.
Warren, David M., 682.
Warren, Mrs. Emily H., 681.
Warren, I. Miller, 678.
Warren, Joyce, 727n.
Warren, Lindsay C, 681%.
Warren, Lindsay C, Jr., 672.
790
Index
Warren, Stewart, 700.
Warren (Lindsay C.) Bridge, speeches at,
listed, 498, 503.
Warthen, Harry, Jr., quoted, 413.
Washington County Union School, ad-
dressed by Sanford, 129-130.
Wasson, J. M., 750.
Water resources, 54-55; appropriations
for, 22.
Water Resources, Board of, appointments
to, 709-710; Department of, 55, 308;
Chairman of, 535; tourist industry pro-
moted by, 632.
Water Well Contractor Examiners, Board
of, appointments to, 731.
Waterside Theater, Manteo, speech at,
listed, 505.
Watkins, John S., Jr., 716.
Watkins, R. W., 699n.
Watkins, Robert William, 677.
Watlington, John, 750.
Watson, John Dargan, 726.
Watson, Max, 669n.
Watson, Mrs. Maybelle High, 724.
Watson, Thomas L., Jr., 726.
Wayne County Industrial Committee,
speech to, listed, 519.
Wayne County libaries, 126.
Wayne Technical Institute, addressed by
Sanford, 449; trustee appointments to,
723.
Waynick, Capus, 597, 599, 653%.
Weatherford, W. D., 742.
Weatherly, A. Earl, 692.
Weathers, Carroll W., 714.
Weaver, David S., 739.
Weaver, Fred H., 700, 703, 740. J
Weaver, L. S., 741.
Weaver, L. Stacy, Jr., 697.
Weaver, Lawrence 0., 717, 742.
Weaver, Philip J., 706.
Webb, Mrs. J. C, 683.
Webb, James, 682, 684, 115n.
Webb, James E., introductions of, listed,
504, 511.
Webb, James Elsie, 680; controversy con-
cerning, 603-606.
Webb, John, 724.
Webb, W. C, 738.
Weeks, Carl E., 684.
Weeks, Mangum, 683.
Weisiger, Leslie M., 673.
Weitz, Henry, 749.
Welborn, Max O., 686.
Weldon, N. W., 717n.
Weldon, N. Warren, 686.
Welfare, state and local departments of,
359; see also Public Welfare.
Wells, Herbert George, quoted, 435.
Wells, J. 0., 693n.
Wells, William W., Jr., 694.
Wentz, C. H., 716.
West, Herman H., 673.
West, William L., Jr., 698.
West Montgomery High School, 496.
Westcott, Harry T., 46, 4:Gn; serves as
Chairman of Utilities Commission, 708.
Western Carolina College, 83, 84; ad-
dressed by Sanford, 419; trustee ap-
pointments to, 723.
Western Electric Awards Luncheon,
speech at, listed, 514.
Western Electric Company, 475.
Western N.C. Associated Communities,
433.
Wheatley, Charles H., 660, 725.
Wheeler, Charles L., 686.
Wheeler, John H., 601, 601??,, 745.
Wheeler, John W., 743.
Whichard, David, 718.
Whitaker, Paul F., 688.
White, Ed L., 719n.
White, Eugene M., 714.
White, Mrs. Gertrude, 699.
White, James M., llbn.
White, John, watercolors of, 441.
White, Lee, 681n.
White, Perry, 692, 694.
White, Thomas J., 67, 61n, 666, 742.
White, W. H., 652, 653, 65Sn.
White, William H., 656.
White, William Johnson, Sr., 654.
White Lake, appointments for, 736.
White Rock Baptist Church, speech at,
listed, 512.
Whiteley, Thomas, 701.
Whitener, Basil, pictured, facing 626.
Whitener, Catherine, 707n.
Whitener, D. J., 65971.
Whitfield, Mrs. J. V., 664.
Whitfield, Vivian, 55, 55n, 705.
Whitley, A. B., Jr., 720.
Whitmire, Boyce, 700, 704, 723.
Whitted, Earl, Jr., 723.
Whyburn, William M., 661%.
Wicker, J. Shelton, 67, 677i, 704, 705%, 742.
Wilbur, Karl M., 668.
Wilder, Roy E., Jr., 746.
Wildlife Resources Commission 632; ap-
pointments to, 710; funds for, 54.
Wilkes County Community College, trus-
tee appointments to, 723.
Wilkes County Court, judge for, 738.
Willetts, Frederick, Sr., 719%.
Williams, Mrs. Al, 664.
Williams, Ben F,, 709.
Williams, Charles E., Jr., 738, 739%.
Williams, Clawson L., 655%.
Index
791
Williams, D. Leon, quoted, 564.
Williams, Horace, 381.
Williams, J. 0., 664.
Williams, John A., Jr., 733.
Williams, John J., 604.
Williams, Kenneth R., 708.
Williams, Mrs. LaLuce, 706.
Williams, R. M., 694.
Williams, Robert, xxxiv.
Williams, Robert E., 528, 706.
Williams, Robert M., 737.
Williams, Roy B., 717.
Williams, Staton P., 672.
Williams, T. Baxter, Jr., 707, 707^1.
Williams, Warren, 674.
Williamson, Delmon F., 724.
Williamson, John C, 678.
Williamson, Odell, lS7n.
Willis, Alida, 703, 746.
Willis, Elmer, 270.
Willis, Henry Stuart, 45, 45??.
Willson, William W., 708.
Wilmington College, 298; speech at, list-
ed, 497; trustee appointments for, 724.
Wilson, Mrs. Dorothy, 744.
Wilson, Harry L., 717n.
Wilson, Henry Hall, 740; introduction of,
listed, 516.
Wilson, John K., 744.
Wilson, John R., 670.
Wilson, Martin L., 718.
Wilson, William L., 660.
Wilson, Woodrow, 157; New Freedom of,
236; proposes League of Nations, 104.
Wilson Area Technical Institute, trustee
appointments for, 724.
Wilson Industrial Council, 107.
Wilson Memorial Hospital, speech at,
listed, 519.
Wilson Sanatorium, 45.
Wily, J. Fleming, Jr., 715.
Wimbish, W. T., 737n.
Winborne, John Wallace, 654, 655%.
Wingate College, speech at, listed, 511.
Winkler, Gordon H., 673.
Winkler, W. Ralph, Sr., 693.
Winslow, Francis E., 666.
Winslow, J. Emmett, 665n.
Winslow, Mts. J. Emmett, 682.
Winslow, Rex S., 667.
Winston, Ellen, 176, 185, 185n, 697n, 738,
739n, 748.
Winston-Salem, 446, 447; location of
School of Performing Arts at, 448, 619.
Winston-Salem Teachers College, trustee
appointments for, 724.
Winters, John W., 743.
Wirtz, Willard, 478.
Withers, Lawson, 749.
Wofford, Jack, 697.
Wolfe, Thomas, 381, 396.
Woltz, J. A., ISbn.
Womble, J. J., 736.
Womble, William F., 675'm.
Womble, William G., Jr., 684, 708.
Women, appointments of, 176; Commis-
sion on the Status of, appointments to,
748, establishment of, 536-538.
Women's Clubs, speeches to, listed, 491,
500.
Wood, H. A., 60, 60n, 676.
Wood, Jack, 748.
Wood, John Gilliam, 680, 683.
Wood, William Z., 708, 734.
Woodard, B. Paul, 692.
Woodard, Thomas H., 67, 67%, 742.
Woodberry, Lewis E., 750.
Woodbury, Louie, Jr., 677.
Woodhall, Barnes, 660, 690.
Woodhouse, Edwin W., 686, 698.
Woodhouse, 0. L., 710. -
Woodhouse, Wilson W., 696, 697%.
Woods, Dorothy, 727%.
Woodson, James L., 678, 679%.
Woodson, Richard Peyton III, 687.
Woodson, Walter, Sr., 673.
Woody, Jonathan, 723.
Woody, Robert H., 668.
Woollcot, Phillip, 723, 723%.
Wooten, Arthur, 724.
Work Release Program, 57-58; legislation
regarding, 238, 318; see also Prisoners.
Workmen's Compensation, 43, 350.
World Food Bank, 112, 167, 352.
World Peace Award, speech for, listed,
519.
World War II, Sanford's participation in,
xxii-xxiii.
Worsley, Richard K., 725, 725%.
Worthington, Gerard de Tr afford, 679,
679%.
Worthington, Samuel Otis, 708.
Wortman, Olive, 729.
Wray, Mrs. Dorothea, 729.
Wreck Commissioners, appointments to,
710.
Wren, J. Robert, 720.
Wrenn, J. Speight, 738, 739%.
Wright, Mrs. Homer, 715%.
Wright, Manly E., 662, 713.
Wright, Thomas H., 666, 669%.
Wright Brothers, 168, 399-400.
Wrightsville Beach, appointments for, 737.
Wynn, Roy S., 690.
Wynne, J. C, Jr., 720.
Y
YW'GA Building Campaign, speech at,
listed, 499.
792
Index
Yancey, W. T., 716.
"^arboroug-h, Robert A., 722.
Yarborougrh, T. Earl, 748.
Yaupon Beach, commissioners for, 737-
738.
Yeager, William S., 704.
Yelton, Nathan H., 739.
Ylvisaker, Paul, 612.
York, Don J., death of, 566.
Young Democratic Clubs, xxiv, 189; First
Congressional District rally of, address-
ed by Sanford, 212; of Raleigh, Rickover
introductory speech to, listed, 492; of
Southern Pines, introductory speech to,
listed, 516; of Statesville, addressed by
Sanford, 213-214; Sanford's activity in,
xxiii; speeches to, listed, 495, 497, 503,
509, 511, 513, 521.
Young Turks Dinner, speech at, listed,
512.
Yount, Mrs. Worth, 689ti.
Younts, Jack S., 708.
Younts, Paul Reid, 680.
Youth Appreciation Week, designation <
Youth Fitness Commission, addressed
Sanford, 143-145.
Z
Z. Smith Reynolds Foundation, 392.
Zacharias, Jerrold R., introductory spees
of, listed, 492.
Zane, Edward R., 743.
Zaytown, Joseph, 674.
Zealy, A. H., Jr., 676.
Zerden, Marvin, 675.
Zimmerman, Mrs. Dorothy Y., 706.
Zollicoffer, A. Augustus, Jr., 672.
Norfh Carolina State Library
Raleigh
DATE DUE
2 1 n
88
FEB 0 1 ?(
CAVLORO
PRINTCO IN U.S.A.